Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3035-3046
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3035
Table 1 Characteristics of the patients in two groups
Item
Control (n = 128)
Early warning (n = 136)
P value
Sex, n (%)
Male72 (56.3)69 (50.7)0.369
Female56 (43.8)67 (49.3)
Age (years), mean ± SD65.9 ± 11.363.4 ± 12.70.096
BMI (kg/m2), mean ± SD21.6 ± 3.322.3 ± 4.20.108
Education, n (%)0.263
Junior middle school and below36 (28.1)41 (30.2)
Senior high school and technical secondary school59 (40.1)50 (36.8)
Junior college and undergraduate and above33 (25.8)45 (33.1)
Marital status, n (%)0.736
Living with a spouse86 (67.2)94 (66.9)
Unmarried, widowed or divorced42 (32.8)42 (30.9)
Hypertension, n (%)23 (17.9)19 (14.0)0.375
Diabetes, n (%)18 (14.1)24 (17.6)0.402
Hyperlipemia, n (%)15 (11.7)18 (13.2)0.710
Preoperative VTE risk classification, n (%)0.488
Moderate risk52 (40.6)61 (44.9)
High risk76 (59.4)75 (55.2)
TNM, n (%)0.928
I34 (26.6)39 (28.7)
II51 (39.9)53 (39.0)
III43 (33.6)44 (32.4)
Surgical method, n (%)0.524
Radical resection of gastric cancer68 (53.1)70 (51.5)
Radical resection of rectal cancer42 (32.8)40 (29.4)
Radical resection of colon cancer18 (14.1)26 (19.12)
Operation time (min), mean ± SD118.5 ± 45.7121.8 ± 51.90.247
Intraoperative blood loss (mL), mean ± SD85.3 ± 21.689.7 ± 23.60.076
Length of hospital stay (day), mean ± SD15.27 ± 2.6814.69 ± 2.350.062
Table 2 Comparison of deep vein thrombosis occurrence rate, venous thromboembolism risk assessment rate by nurses, and implementation rate of VTE preventive measures between the two groups

Control (n = 128)
Early warning (n = 136)
P value
Occurrence of DVT, n (%))18 (14.1)9 (6.6)0.046
Correct rates of VTE risk assessment of nurse evaluation, n (%)84 (65.6)118 (86.8)< 0.001
Standard implementation rate of VTE preventive measures of patients, n (%)74 (57.8)109 (80.2)< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of coagulation indicators between two groups at different points in time

Control (n = 128)
Early warning (n = 136)
P value
d-dimer (µg/mL), mean ± SD
Before0.46 ± 0.200.44 ± 0.240.473
1 d1.86 ± 0.962.04 ± 1.270.197
3 d3.27 ± 1.852.68 ± 1.740.008
7 d2.75 ± 1.821.52 ± 1.030.000
Prothrombin time (s), mean ± SD
Before11.3 ± 1.411.1 ± 1.00.061
1 d11.5 ± 1.111.3 ± 1.20.359
3 d11.7 ± 1.011.5 ± 0.90.057
7 d11.2 ± 1.211.3 ± 1.00.648
Fibrinogen degradation product, mean ± SD
Before2.54 ± 1.522.67 ± 1.360.464
1 d7.26 ± 3.216.82 ± 3.290.273
3 d7.69 ± 2.275.62 ± 2.110.000
7 d8.16 ± 4.264.38 ± 3.040.000
Activated partial thromboplastin time (s), mean ± SD
Before33.1 ± 6.432.2 ± 5.70.242
1 d35.6 ± 7.335.7 ± 6.60.925
3 d34.6 ± 6.632.8 ± 7.30.523
7 d62.3 ± 6.332.3 ± 6.60.247
Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the occurrence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis of patients with gastrointestinal cancer
DVT Group (n = 27)Non-DVT Group (n = 237)Univariate
Multivariate
OR
95%CI
P value
OR
95%CI
P value
Age70.81 ± 7.9560.17 ± 8.361.031.04-1.350.0261.0831.070-3.2650.032
Gender
Male16 (59.26)125 (52.74)1
Female11 (40.74)112 (47.26)1.300. 58-2.930.52
BMI22.56 ± 1.9221.83 ± 2.511.090.96-1.230.145
Education background
Junior secondary and below5 (18.52)72 (30.38)1
Above junior secondary22 (81.48)165 (69.62)0.520.19-1.430.371
Marital status
Having a spouse17 (62.96)163 (68.78)1
Unmarried, widowed, or divorced10 (37.04)74 (31.22)0.770.33-1.760.539
Hypertension, no17 (62.96)205 (84.50)3.771.58-8.950.002
Diabetes, no22 (81.48)200 (84.39)1.230.43-3.450.78
Hyperlipidemia, yes8 (29.63)25 (10.55)3.571.41-8.990.0051.1271.139-2.5640.042
TNM
I, II6 (22.22)67 (28.27)1
III12 (44.45)75 (31.65)0.560.25-1.260.18
Surgery method
Radical gastrectomy13 (48.15)125 (52.74)1
Radical resection of colorectal cancer9 (33.33)73 (30.80)0.8320.37-1.810.651
Preoperative VTE risk grade
Medium-risk6 (22.22)107 (45.15)1
High risk21 (77.78)130 (54.85)1.120.13-0.890.0232.1311.085-5.1780.001
Time of operation (min)128.4 ± 29.47112.2 ± 35.761.071.13-1.370.0242.2682.005-5.5460.026
Intraoperative bleeding volume (mL)91.46 ± 17.3885.25 ± 20.261.060.48-1.260.127
Adoption of early warning prevention, no18 (66.67)110 (46.41)1.280.18-1.00.0463.7471.523-6.9560.017
Table 5 Comparison of venous thromboembolism knowledge in nurses before and after implementation

Before implementation (n = 86)
After implementation (n = 86)
P value
VTE basic knowledge, mean ± SD20.0 ± 3.723.6 ± 4.3< 0.001
VTE evaluation knowledge, mean ± SD18.2 ± 4.023.4 ± 4.2< 0.001
VTE prevention knowledge, mean ± SD22.3 ± 3.425.4 ± 2.5< 0.001
Total score, mean ± SD62.4 ± 10.171.3 ± 11.4< 0.001