Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2014; 2(4): 111-119
Published online Apr 16, 2014. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i4.111
Rare case of an abdominal mass: Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor of the stomach encroaching on multiple abdominal organs
Xiao-Jiang Yi, Chuang-Qi Chen, Yin Li, Jin-Ping Ma, Shi-Rong Cai, Yu-Long He, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
Zhi-Xun Li, Department of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: Yi XJ and Chen CQ conducted the literature review, drafted and revised the manuscript, and approved the final submitted draft; Li Y performed the gastroscopy in the patient and provided the gastroscopic report and pictures; Li ZX conducted the gastroscopic and postoperative pathological evaluation of the biopsy and provided the pathological reports and pictures; Ma JP, Cai SR and He YL revised the manuscript and approved the final submitted draft.
Correspondence to: Chuang-Qi Chen, MD, PhD, Professor of Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Colorectal Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, No. 58, Zhongshan 2nd Road, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong Province, China. ccqsums@gmail.com
Telephone: +86-20-87755766 Fax: +86-20-87333122
Received: October 7, 2013
Revised: March 2, 2014
Accepted: March 13, 2014
Published online: April 16, 2014
Processing time: 185 Days and 0.1 Hours

Abstract

Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor (RNFP), which presents abdominal clinical manifestations and malignant radiographic results, usually requires radical resection as the treatment. However, RNFP has been recently described as an extremely rare benign post-inflammatory lesion of a reactive nature, which typically arises from the sub-serosal layer of the digestive tract or within the surrounding mesentery in association with local injury or inflammation. In addition, a postoperative diagnosis is necessary to differentiate it from the other reactive processes of the abdomen. Furthermore, RNFP shows a good prognosis without signs of recurrence or metastasis. A 16-year-old girl presented with a 3-mo history of epigastric discomfort, and auxiliary examinations suggested a malignant tumor originating from the stomach; postoperative pathology confirmed RNFP, and after a 2-year follow-up period, the patient did not display any signs of recurrence. This case highlights the importance of preoperative pathology for surgeons who may encounter similar cases.

Key Words: Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor; Post-inflammatory lesion; Digestive tract; Mesentery; Good prognosis

Core tip: Our case report describes a rare benign tumor originating from the gastrointestinal tract. To date, this lesion has been reported in 20 cases worldwide. The most significant and important insights are that these diseases possess fairly good prognosis with opposite radiographic and clinical findings. Pathologically, reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor (RNFP) was recently described arising from the sub-serosal layer or within the surrounding mesentery. However, the veracity of the pathological examination results and the etiology are still controversial. We will describe the complete diagnostic and therapeutic process of a young girl with RNFP and will retrospectively analyze the previously reported cases, particularly the microscopic and immunohistochemical characteristics.



INTRODUCTION

Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor (RNFP) is a recently reported lesion that may arise from the gastrointestinal tract or the mesentery. It was first described by Yantiss et al[1] in 2003. To date, 20 cases (8 cases in Czech Republic[2], 7 cases in the United States[1,3,4], 2 cases in France[5,6], and 1 case each in Australia[7], Turkey[8] and Italy[9]) have been reported in the literature. We described the first case in China. All the cases require surgical interventions with or without preoperative pathological examinations because of their typically malignant radiographic results. However, this lesion presents an encouraging prognosis during follow-up. Here we present a case in a young female patient.

CASE REPORT

A 16-year-old girl from Jiangxi Province with no surgical history or abdominal injury history presented to a local medical institution with an approximately 3-mo history of progressive epigastric discomfort. Gastroscopy suggested a highly suspicious malignant tumor of the gastric cardia and fundus, chronic erythematosus exudative antral gastritis and a duodenal bulbar ulcer. For further treatment, the patient was admitted to our hospital. Her abdominal examination revealed light tenderness in the epigastric region. A computed tomography (CT) scan showed a mass (5.8 cm × 3.8 cm × 7.9 cm) in the lesser curvature of the fundus attached to the left adrenal gland with obscure boundaries, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) was suspected (Figure 1). Gastroscopy revealed a protruding lesion on the back wall of the gastric cardia and fundus with a coarse surface, and an approximately 1.0 cm × 1.0 cm ulcer was located in the middle of the lesion (Figure 2). Gastroscopic pathological biopsy findings demonstrated an ulcer-forming chronic gastritis without evidence of carcinoma (Figure 3); immunohistochemically, the biopsy specimen was positive for CK and M-CEA in the glandular epithelium, positive for CD31 and CD34 in the vascular endothelium, and positive for CD3 and L26 in the small lymphocytes. Therefore, lymphoma and gastric cancer were excluded (Figure 4), and additional immunohistochemical diagnostic evidence was needed to differentiate GIST from other differential diagnoses (Figure 5). Further gastroscopic ultrasonography showed an immense mass (approximately 4.8 cm × 3.1 cm) that did not penetrate the serosa with an uneven hypoechoic appearance and blood flow on the back wall of the lesser curvature of the fundus. Approximately 6-7 lymph nodes were found next to the mass, and the largest one was 0.6 cm in size. Based on these findings, the patient was sent to the operating room with a presumptive diagnosis of malignant tumor of the fundus (GIST). Upon exploratory laparotomy, a small nodule (1.0 cm × 1.0 cm) in the lesser omentum was detected, and the main mass (approximately 8.0 cm × 6.0 cm × 5.0 cm) was located in the lesser curvature of the gastric cardia and fundus transmurally infiltrating the stomach and encroaching on the pancreatic body and tail, spleen, and left adrenal gland; several swollen perigastric lymph nodes were also visible. Based on the above findings, a total resection of the stomach, pancreatic body and tail, spleen, and left adrenal gland was performed. An esophagojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis was used to reconstruct the digestive tract. Postoperative pathologic evaluation revealed a mass (approximately 8.0 cm × 6.0 cm) with a coarse surface transmurally infiltrating the stomach. The gross gastric specimen (15.0 cm × 11.0 cm × 5.0 cm in size) revealed a small depressed region 2.0 cm in size below the main mass. Microscopically, ulcers were detected on the mucosa; the sub-mucosa was composed of mature spindle cells embedded in a dense collagenic hyalinized stroma containing abundant infiltrative lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and hyperplastic lymphoid follicles. No mitosis, necrosis, or nuclear atypia was identified. Other sections including the pancreatic body and tail, spleen, and left adrenal gland and lymph nodes did not reveal any carcinoma tissue, and the staple line also appeared to be microscopically free of tumor. The immunohistochemistry findings of the spindle cells were as follows: actin focally (+), CD34 focally (+), CD117 (-), S-100 (-), desmin (-), DOG-1 (-), PDGFR (-), Ki-67 approximately 2% (+); the immunohistochemistry findings of the lymphocytes were as follows: CD3 (+), L26 (+). Combining the Hematoxylin Eosin (HE) stain and immunohistochemistry, the lesion was diagnosed as RNFP (Figure 6). Postoperatively, the patient’s laboratory evaluation revealed elevated white blood cells and platelets. Accordingly, antibiotics, dipyridamole, and bayaspirin were administered as symptomatic treatment. The patient did well after these interventions and was discharged from the hospital on postoperative day 11. Then, 10 mo later, a follow-up CT scan examination was clear of signs of recurrence and metastatic disease (Figure 7). After more than 2 years of follow-up, the patient did not complain of any discomfort and no signs of recurrence have been found.

Figure 1
Figure 1 A computed tomography scan showing a mass (5. 8 cm × 3.8 cm × 7.9 cm) in the lesser curvature of the fundus attached to the left adrenal gland with obscure boundaries (white arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2 Gastroscopy revealing a protruding lesion on the back wall of the gastric cardia and fundus with a coarse surface, and an approximately 1. 0 cm × 1.0 cm ulcer was located in the middle of the lesion (black arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3 Gastroscopic pathological biopsy findings (Hematoxylin eosin stain) demonstrating an ulcer-forming chronic gastritis without evidence of carcinoma. [Magnification: A (10 × 10); B (10 × 20)].
Figure 4
Figure 4 Immunohistochemistry of gastroscopic pathological biopsy. A: Glandular epithelium CK (+); B: Glandular epithelium M-CEA (+); C: Vascular endothelium CD31 (+); D: Vascular endothelium CD34 (+); E: Small lymphocyte CD3 (+); F: Small lymphocyte L26 (+). Magnification: 10 × 20.
Figure 5
Figure 5 More immunohistochemistry of endoscopic pathological biopsy. A: Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (+); B: β-catenin (+); C: Desmin (-); D: Actin (+); E: CD117 (-); F: DOG-1 (-); G: S-100 (-). Magnification: 10 × 20.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Hematoxylin Eosin stain. A-D: Microscopically, sub-mucosa composing of mature spindle cells embedded in a dense collagenic hyalinized stroma containing aboundant infiltrative lymphocytes, plasmocytes, and hyperplastic lymphoid follicles with incomplete capsule. No mitosis, necrosis, or nuclear atypia was identified; E-N: Immunohistochemistry, spindle cells: E: Actin focally (+); F: CD34 focally (+); G: CD117 (-); H: S-100 (-); I: desmin (-); J: DOG-1 (-); K: PDGFR (-); L: Ki-67 approximately 2% (+); lymphocytes: M: CD3 (+); N: L26 (+). Magnification: A (10 × 10); B, D-N (10 × 20); C (10 × 40).
Figure 7
Figure 7 Follow-up abdominal computed tomography scan after 10 mo showing no signs of recurrence and metastatic disease.

HE stained 4-mm slides were cut from paraffin embedded tissue that was processed with 10% buffered formalin. A panel of antibodies (Table 1) was used to evaluate the tumors for the presence of smooth muscle, fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, glandular epithelium, vascular endothelium and lymphocytic classification. Several pivotal markers expressed in GISTs (CD117, CD34, DOG-1, PDGFR) and inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors [anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)] were used as well.

Table 1 Antibodies and dilutions used in the evaluation of reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor.
AntibodyDilutionSourceAntigen retrieval
CK0.181DakoHeat
Actin0.181DakoHeat
CD34Working solutionNovocastraHeat
CD1170.181DakoHeat
S-1000.736NovocastraHeat
DesminWorking solutionZsjqbioHeat
DOG-10.389ZsjqbioHeat
PDGFR0.181SANTA CRUIHeat
Ki-670.181ZsjqbioHeat
CD3Working solutionZsjqbioHeat
L260.736DakoHeat
ALK0.111DakoHeat
β-Catenin0.181MaixinbioHeat
CD31Working solutionNovocastraHeat
M-CEAWorking solutionNovocastraHeat
DISCUSSION

The first 5 RNFP cases were reported in adults by Yantiss et al[1]. The original pathological description was considered a landmark in the short history of this disease. More recent cases have been reported, and our case represents the 21st report of this lesion worldwide in the English literature.

The adult population appears to be the main target in terms of the age distribution. A total of 18 adult cases (85.7%, age range, 22-72 years) have been reported compared to 1 case in a 1-year-old boy, 2 cases in a 13-year-old girl and our case of a 16-year-old girl. The average age is 46.1 years old (male: 49.6; female: 39.1). The sexual distribution ratio is 2:1 (male to female) consisting of 14 males (66.7%) and 7 females (33.3%). Unquestionably, males are more predisposed to this disease. The leading clinical characteristics can be summarized as follows: 11 patients including our case presented with abdominal symptoms, among which 4 patients had acute abdominal pain while 3 had chronic abdominal discomfort. Past medical history revealed that 5 patients (23.8%) had a history of abdominal surgery. One patient had undergone a left hemicolectomy 17 years previously for stage pT3N0MO-IIA colon cancer according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer[9]. Yantiss et al[1] reported a patient with a history of alcoholism and recurrent pancreatitis, complicated by necrotizing pancreatitis, which required multiple surgical debridements. Another patient had a history of MEN-1 syndrome and multiple abdominal surgeries, including resections of an endocrine tumor of the pancreatic tail and an adrenal adenoma 23 and 21 years previously, respectively; one patient had a history of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy and resection of a duodenal gastrinoma 1 year before the development of this tumor-like mass. The fifth patient’s surgical history included a cholecystectomy some years prior for cholecystitis and an operation in 2001 for a strangulated hernia[7]. A significant abdominal medical history was noted in 9 cases (42.9%), including the following: a peptic ulcer in 3 cases (containing our case); a perforated duodenal diverticulum in a 32-year-old man; endometriosis together with ergotamine use for migraine in a 28-year-old woman; chronic bowel obstruction complicated by an external fistula in a 30-year-old woman; ileus caused by a tumor of the ileum in a 22-year-old man; and ingestion of a foreign body in 2 cases (in one case, it was an iron pin, and in the other, it was a small abscess cavity containing foreign bodies). Hence, in 14 patients (66.7%), a medical or surgical abdominal history appears to play a vital role in the development of RNFP.

In 2004, Daum et al[2] first suggested that RFNP originated from multipotent subserosal progenitor cells rather than myofibroblasts; therefore, some scholars had addressed the importance of investigating a patient’s past abdominal surgery and medical history because such conditions could more or less trigger the occurrence of these lesions’ and illustrated its reactive nature. The general findings were that these lesions represented an exuberant inflammatory response rather than a true tumor. However, our case was similar to the minority of RNFPs without a previous abdominal surgery or injury.

RNFP presented with multiple masses or, a bit more frequently, as a single mass (13 cases, 61.9%). All of the cases underwent complete resections (18 cases, 85.7%) except 3 cases in which incomplete resections were performed because of too many masses or nodules. One patient was a 71-year-old man with multiple hepatic deposits[9], and in a 28-year-old woman, numerous nodules presenting on the surface of the ovaries, appendix, the bowel mesentery, the abdominal peritoneal wall, and the omentum were detected[8]. The anatomic site of the main lesions most commonly involved the colon with the appendix (7 patients) followed by the mesentery and the small bowel (especially the terminal ileum) (7 cases each), omentum (2 cases), the peritoneal wall (3 cases), the hepatic capsule, the gastric wall, and the peripancreas (1 case each). Our case was the first to be diagnosed as RNFP transmurally infiltrating the stomach, encroaching on the pancreatic body and tail, the spleen, and the left adrenal gland. Commonly, RNFP lesions are depicted as firm and of light colors from whitish to tan or gray; rarely, calcifications are present in the lesions (3 cases, 14.3%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Gross anatomopathological characteristic of reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor reported previously.
Ref.Number of lesionSize of main lesion (cm)MorphologyMethod of resectionSite of main lesion
2Yantiss et al[1]Multiple6.5 in diameterFirm, tan-whiteComplete resectionMesentery of small intestine
Single4.3 in diameterDittoComplete resectionPeripancreas
Multiple5.5 in diameterDittoComplete resectionMesentery of small intestine and large bowel
Multiple6.5 in diameterDittoIncomplete resectionMesentery of small intestine
Single2.8 in diameterDittoComplete resectionMesentery of large bowel
3Daum et al[2]Single3.0 in diameter1Complete resectionSmall intestine
Single1White fibrous, containing an iron pinComplete resectionLarge bowel
Single3.0 × 3.0FibrousComplete resectionLarge bowel
Single10.0 in diameterContaining a coprolithComplete resectionLarge bowel
Single8.0 × 3.01Complete resectionSmall intestine
Single8.0 in diameterYellow-white, elasticComplete resectionSubserosa and mesentery of large bowel
Single4.0 × 7.0 × 2.0Hard fibrous, containing minute calcificationsComplete resectionSmall intestine
Single3.0 × 4.0 × 6.0A small abscess cavity containing foreign bodiesComplete resectionSubserosa of large bowel
Chatelain et al[5]Single9.0 in diameterFirm, whiteComplete resectionMesentery of large bowel
Zardawi et al[7]Multiple0.5 × 2.2Firm, white, containing two gray cord-like structuresComplete resectionSmall intestine and the omentum
Saglam et al[8]Multiple0.6-6.0 in diameterFirm, tan to whiteIncomplete resectionThe pelvic and abdominal peritoneum
Gauchotte et al[6]Multiple1.9-2.2 in diameterFirm, grayish whiteComplete resectionStomach
Yin et al[3]Single2.0-3.0 in diameter4Tan, white, containing calcificationsComplete resectionMesentery of small intestine
Virgilio et al[9]Multiple6.0 × 4.0 × 3.0Firm, white, containing calcificationsIncomplete resectionSmall intestine, hepatic capsule the left paracolic gutter
McAteer et al[4]Single8.8 × 3.8 × 2.0Firm, tan-grayComplete resectionMesentery of small intestine

Microscopically, all of the lesions shared the same feature consisting of a paucicellular proliferation of spindle or stellate cells embedded in a hyalinized matrix and sometimes surrounded by inflammatory cells (mostly in the form of mononuclear lymphoid cells) or lymphoid aggregates. If a lesion contains foreign bodies, dispersed giant cell granulomas are observed. Characteristically, the lesions do not show mitosis, necrosis, or nuclear atypia.

Ultra-structural examination of 3 cases by Daum et al[2] revealed spindle or stellate-shaped cells with rare intercellular junctions and irregular nuclei, prominent rough endoplasmic reticulum, sparse pinocytic vesicles, bundles of microfilaments attached to dense bodies, and focal investment by external lamina. These features were typical of myofibroblastic differentiation. In addition, genetic investigations revealed no substitutions, deletions, or insertions occurring in exon 11 of the c-kit in 7 specimens. Likewise, no deletions or insertions in part of exon 9 were observed. As above, ultra-structural analysis was performed by Yantiss et al[1] in 1 case, and the spindle or stellate-shaped cells were shown to contain abundant rough endoplasmic reticulum, aggregates of filaments associating with dense bodies, which are characteristic of fibroblastic and myofibroblastic differentiation.

Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated that all of the lesions stained positively for vimentin, (17/18) SMA, (8/15) CK, (10/13) MSA, except 4 cases that stained positively for CD117 reported by Yantiss et al[1] and 1 case reported by Chatelain et al[5]; most cases are negative for CD117. The vast majority of the lesions stained negatively for desmin, CD34, S-100 protein, and anaplastic lymphoma kinase-1. The immunohistochemical features of our case showed actin focally (+), CD34 focally (+), CD117 (-), S-100 (-), desmin (-), DOG-1 (-), PDGFR (-), Ki-67 approximately 2% (+). Thus, based on these observations, our case is consistent with a diagnosis of RNFP (Table 3).

Table 3 Immunohistochemical findings of reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor reported previously.
Ref.VimentinSMACytokeratin (AE1/AE3)MSADesminS-100CD34CD117ALK-1CK5/6EMACAM5.234βE12CD68PI
1Yantiss et al[1](+) (5/5)(+) (3/5)(-) (0/5)(+) (4/5)(+) (3/5)(-) (0/5)(-) (0/5)(+) (4/5)(-) (0/5)(-) (0/5)
2Daum et al[2](+)Focally (+)Focally (+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)< 1.0%
(+)(+)(+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)0%
(+)Focally (+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)3.70%
(+)(+)Focally (+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)Focally (+)(-)(-)< 1.0%
(+)(+)Focally (+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)< 1.0%
(+)(+)Focally (+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(+)3.50%
NMFocally (+)NMNM(-)(-)NM(-)(-)NMNMNMNMNM< 1.0%
(+)Focally (+)Focally (+)Focally (+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)< 1.0%
3Chatelain et al[5](+)(+)
Zardawi et al[7](+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)
4Saglam et al[8](+)(+)(-)(-)(+)
5Gauchotte et al[6](+)(+)(+)(-)(-)(-)(-)(-)
Virgilio et al[9](+)Focally (+)(-)(-)(-)
6McAteer et al[4](+)(+)(+)Focally (+)(-)(-)(-)(-)

Importantly, RNFP must be distinguished from the other reactive processes of the abdomen [such as calcifying fibrous pseudotumor, Vanek’s tumor, retroperitoneal fibrosis, sclerosing mesenteritis, nodular fascitis, intra-abdominal fibromatosis] and more aggressive mesenchymal tumors, such as GIST, intraabdominal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, and inflammatory fibrosarcoma; such a differentiation may have strict requirement for pathologists.

Of the 21 patients, almost all cases underwent complete resections (18 cases, 85.7%); incomplete resections were performed in 3 cases because of too many masses or nodules. Surgical resection is currently the definitive method in these patients, and no chemotherapy treatment has been reported. Follow-up of 11 patients was available, without signs of recurrence and metastasis regardless of the modus operandi (Table 4).

Table 4 General information and clinical feature of reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor reported previously.
Ref.GenderAgePresenting symptomsMedical historyFollow up
Yantiss et al[1]Male481No residual disease following surgical resection (mean follow-up 16.3 mo) and one patient who had an incomplete surgical resection had stable disease at 26 mo
Female501Abdominal surgical history
Male53Acute abdominal pain1
Male57Acute abdominal pain1
Male711Abdominal surgical history
Daum et al[2]Male59Abdominal symptoms14 patients are available, without signs of recurrence and metastatic disease 5, 5, 6, and 7 yr, respectively
Male461
Male1Abdominal symptoms
Male681
Female30Abdominal symptoms
Female651
Male22Abdominal symptoms
Male411
Chatelain et al[5]Male32Chronic abdominal pain11
Zardawi et al[7]Female721Abdominal surgical history1
Saglam et al[8]Female28Chronic abdominal painAbdominal history1
Gauchotte et al[6]Male601Abdominal historyNo evidence of disease 4 mo later
Yin et al[3]Male65Acute abdominal painNo abdominal surgical history1
Virgilio et al[9]Male711Abdominal surgical historyNo signs of recurrent 4 yr later
Mcateer et al[4]Female13Acute abdominal painNo abdominal surgical history1
COMMENTS
Case characteristics

A 16-year-old girl presented to the hospital with an approximately 3-mo history of progressive epigastric discomfort.

Clinical diagnosis

Approximately 3-mo history of progressive epigastric discomfort.

Differential diagnosis

Gastric cancer, colon cancer, acute pancreatitis.

Laboratory diagnosis

Laboratory tests were within normal limits.

Imaging diagnosis

A computed tomography scan showed a mass (5.8 cm × 3.8 cm × 7.9 cm) in the lesser curvature of the fundus attached to the left adrenal gland with obscure boundaries.

Pathological diagnosis

Gastroscopic pathological biopsy demonstrated chronic ulcer-forming gastritis without evidence of carcinoma; immunohistochemically, the biopsy specimen was positive for CK and M-CEA in the glandular epithelium, positive for CD31 and CD34 in the vascular endothelium, and positive for CD3 and L26 in small lymphocytes, therefore, lymphoma and gastric cancer were excluded.

Treatment

A total resection of the stomach, pancreatic body and tail, spleen, and left adrenal gland was performed, and an esophagojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomosis was performed to reconstruct the digestive tract.

Related reports

The lesion is not very well understood and did not have predictive biomarkers to indicate reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor.

Term explanation

Actin, CD34, CD117, S-100, desmin, DOG-1, PDGFR, CD3 and L26 are immunohistochemical methods that are used for differentiating other tumors.

Experiences and lessons

In the future, more microscopic and immunohistochemical methods should be developed, and more molecular level studies of these lesions to elucidate the etiology are needed.

Peer review

This case presented in this article is well documented and interesting as it describes a rare pathology.

Footnotes

P- Reviewers: Lu YW, Tanase CP S- Editor: Wen LL L- Editor: A E- Editor: Liu SQ

References
1.  Yantiss RK, Nielsen GP, Lauwers GY, Rosenberg AE. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor of the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery: a clinicopathologic study of five cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 2003;27:532-540.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Daum O, Vanecek T, Sima R, Curik R, Zamecnik M, Yamanaka S, Mukensnabl P, Benes Z, Michal M. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumors of the gastrointestinal tract: report of 8 cases. Int J Surg Pathol. 2004;12:365-374.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Chatelain D, Manaouil D, Levy P, Joly JP, Sevestre H, Regimbeau JM. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor of the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:416; author reply 417.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Zardawi IM, Catterall N, Cox SA. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor of the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery. Am J Surg Pathol. 2004;28:276-277.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
5.  Saglam EA, Usubütün A, Kart C, Ayhan A, Küçükali T. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor involving the pelvic and abdominal cavity: a case report and review of literature. Virchows Arch. 2005;447:879-882.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Gauchotte G, Bressenot A, Serradori T, Boissel P, Plénat F, Montagne K. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor: a first report of gastric localization and clinicopathologic review. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2009;33:1076-1081.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Yin SS, Zhang L, Cziffer-Paul A, Divino CM, Chin E. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor presenting as a small bowel obstruction. Am Surg. 2011;77:790-791.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
8.  Virgilio E, Pucci E, Pilozzi E, Mongelli S, Cavallini M, Ferri M. Reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor of the gastrointestinal tract and mesentery giving multiple hepatic deposits and associated with colon cancer. Am Surg. 2012;78:E262-E264.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
9.  McAteer J, Huaco JC, Deutsch GH, Gow KW. Torsed reactive nodular fibrous pseudotumor in an adolescent: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47:795-798.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]