Letter to the Editor Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2025; 13(7): 97847
Published online Mar 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.97847
Physical rehabilitation for sensorineural hearing loss in childhood: Progress and challenges
Lu Zhang, Department of Pediatrics, Luzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Luzhou 646600, Sichuan Province, China
Pu-Jue Huang, Xue Deng, Jiao Tang, Yang Zhai, Tao Wang, Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Pu-Jue Huang, Jiao Tang, Department of Pediatrics, The First People's Hospital of Longquanyi District, Chengdu 610100, Sichuan Province, China
Xue Deng, Tao Wang, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children (Sichuan University), Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Yang Zhai, Department of Pediatrics, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, Chengdu 610000, Sichuan Province, China
ORCID number: Lu Zhang (0009-0007-1475-6449); Pu-Jue Huang (0009-0003-1828-5921); Xue Deng (0009-0004-4034-1499); Jiao Tang (0009-0007-5913-7940); Yang Zhai (0009-0009-6388-2702); Tao Wang (0000-0003-1639-5361).
Co-first authors: Lu Zhang and Pu-Jue Huang.
Author contributions: Zhang L and Huang PJ contributed to study concept, study design, manuscript preparation; Deng X and Tang J carried out the definition of intellectual content and manuscript review; Zhai Y was involved in the literature research and manuscript editing; Wang T worked as a guarantor for the integrity of the entire study; all authors have read and approved this article.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Tao Wang, MD, Department of Pediatrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 20 South Renmin Road, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. 44871875@qq.com
Received: June 10, 2024
Revised: October 23, 2024
Accepted: November 19, 2024
Published online: March 6, 2025
Processing time: 167 Days and 15.6 Hours

Abstract

Early intervention for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) in childhood is crucial for auditory and language development. In recent years, innovative auditory stimulation techniques and speech therapy strategies, such as middle ear implants, cochlear implants, auditory brainstem implants, and midbrain implants, have provided new avenues for improving patient outcomes. Additionally, basic research advancements in cell reprogramming and regeneration, stem cell therapy, and targeted drug delivery offer promising approaches to meet the individualized needs of children with SNHL. However, many challenges and unresolved issues remain in the treatment of SNHL. This article comments on the case report, which describes a female pediatric patient with SNHL who underwent foot reflexology which led to the normalization of hearing thresholds. Reflexology is considered to have potential benefits in physical rehabilitation, but its efficacy in hearing restoration requires further scientific validation through rigorous clinical trials and large-scale prospective studies.

Key Words: Sensorineural hearing loss; Childhood; Physical rehabilitation therapy; Recent advances in rehabilitation techniques; Reflexology

Core Tip: Physical rehabilitation for pediatric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) encompasses innovative approaches such as auditory stimulation and speech therapy, which are crucial for auditory and language development. Despite advancements in treatments such as middle ear implants and stem cell therapies, challenges in accessibility and efficacy persist. This article reviews the progress and challenges in physical rehabilitation for SNHL, emphasizing the need for further scientific validation of therapies to better address the individualized needs of children with hearing impairments.



TO THE EDITOR

Hearing impairment in children is a serious issue that can lead to deficits in language, communication, social skills, and motor development[1]. The prevalence of moderate to severe hearing loss in children ranges from 1‰ to 6‰, with 10% of these cases being severe[2]. Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), conductive hearing loss, and mixed hearing loss are the three primary types of hearing loss, with SNHL being the most common type of permanent hearing impairment[3]. Early intervention for SNHL is crucial for a child's growth and development.

The etiology of SNHL remains unclear. Studies suggest that prolonged noise exposure, ototoxic drugs, infections, and trauma-induced inner ear inflammation and oxidative stress are significant mechanisms leading to hearing loss[4,5]. Current pharmacological treatments primarily focus on anti-inflammatory and antioxidant therapies. Glucocorticoids are the most widely used anti-inflammatory drugs and have shown efficacy in sudden SNHL caused by noise, ototoxic drugs, and viral infections, with a recovery rate of 38.4% in the study by Lu et al[6] following the administration of glucocorticoids. Despite some promising results in animal experiments, antioxidant treatments are not yet predominant in clinical practice[7,8]. Overall, pharmacological treatments have limitations, and there is no definitive effective drug therapy for most types of SNHL beyond some cases of sudden hearing loss.

In recent years, physical rehabilitation techniques for SNHL have rapidly developed, focusing on auditory stimulation, speech training, and early rehabilitation. However, these treatments have issues such as high costs, low public awareness, and the inability to address the root cause of hearing impairment. To complement existing treatments, researchers are exploring various potential therapies, such as gene therapy, stem cell therapy, and foot reflexology. Reflexology, as a non-invasive supplementary therapy, has shown effectiveness in relieving symptoms and improving quality of life in conditions such as cancer and multiple sclerosis (MS)[9]. However, there is limited research on its application in SNHL, and no large-scale studies have confirmed its direct positive impact on hearing restoration. High-quality clinical trials are needed to explore the applicability and efficacy of reflexology in SNHL to better meet the rehabilitation needs of children with this condition.

CURRENT STATUS OF PHYSICAL REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDHOOD SNHL
Auditory stimulation-based physical therapy

Early auditory stimulation therapy is crucial for the development of hearing and language skills in infants with hearing impairments. Children who receive early intervention show better development in auditory performance, reading comprehension, speech clarity, and language perception than those who receive late intervention[10,11].

For children with SNHL unresponsive to drug therapy or with congenital SNHL, hearing assistive devices should be considered. These include hearing aids (air conduction and bone conduction), bone-anchored hearing aids, middle ear implants vibrant soundbridge (VSB), cochlear implants (CI), auditory brainstem implants (ABI), and auditory midbrain implants. Hearing aids can improve hearing by amplifying sound for those with residual hearing, but they may have limited comfort and speech recognition rates[12]. VSB, a semi-implantable middle ear device, offers stable and efficient signal transmission with higher comfort and fewer sound distortion issues, effectively improving or restoring hearing[13]. However, VSB has strict clinical indications[14]. CI is the most valuable physical therapy for patients with severe to profound bilateral SNHL[15]. For those with disrupted nerve pathways between the cochlear spiral ganglion and the central auditory pathways, ABI can directly stimulate the auditory regions of the brainstem to transmit sound signals to the auditory cortex.

Auditory stimulation therapies provide auditory information to children with SNHL, helping establish correct neural pathways in the brain's auditory processing areas for nearly normal speech and language development[1]. However, these therapies have high costs and limited accessibility. They also only restore hearing and require comprehensive interventions with other rehabilitation methods to further promote speech and language development in children with hearing impairments.

Speech training-based physical therapy

Early auditory development is the foundation for speech and language development in children, preceding the emergence of speech perception, speech production, and language development[16]. Speech training for auditory recognition, including word recognition and phoneme discrimination, helps children identify acoustic features of speech[17]. Combined with auditory stimulation therapies, individualized speech training (including auditory function training, speech and language function training, and speech therapy) is vital for promoting language development in children with hearing impairments. It improves language comprehension and expression, mitigating adverse language development outcomes[18].

However, speech training faces challenges. Children with hearing aids or CIs may have articulation disorders, reduced speech clarity, slower vocabulary acquisition, and reduced vocabulary compared to their peers[19]. Additionally, family members' lack of awareness and involvement in speech rehabilitation can negatively impact the child's auditory and language development[20,21].

Early rehabilitation-based physical therapy

Early rehabilitation emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration centered around the family, involving specialists, audiologists, speech therapists, special education teachers, psychologists, and family members[22]. If family decisions negatively impact the development of children with hearing loss, professionals can help family members recognize these adverse consequences[23]. This comprehensive approach supports progress in multiple developmental areas, not just hearing and language. Early rehabilitation plans are tailored to individual hearing conditions and language development levels, including family guidance, social skills training, and cognitive development activities[24].

Early intervention plays a crucial role in the rehabilitation of children with SNHL. Utilizing auditory stimulation techniques, speech training, and interdisciplinary collaboration maximizes the potential for auditory and language development, enhancing treatment outcomes. As recognition of early intervention's importance grows and techniques improve, we can expect better support and improvement in the auditory and language development of children with SNHL.

RECENT ADVANCES IN REHABILITATION TECHNIQUES FOR CHILDHOOD SNHL
Cell reprogramming and regeneration

Researchers[25,26] are attempting to use reprogramming techniques to activate specific transcription factors, such as Myc and Notch1, to promote hair cell regeneration in the inner ears of adult mice. Such research supports the conversion of supporting cells into hair cells in animal models, potentially restoring hearing loss caused by hair cell loss. This method may help develop a clinically relevant approach for hair cell regeneration in mature non-transgenic cochleae, laying the foundation for future hearing restoration through hair cell regeneration.

Stem cell therapy

Stem cell therapy is another potential treatment for SNHL. Studies show that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from various tissues can improve hearing function following single-dose injections[27,28]. MSCs can increase spiral ganglion neuron density, potentially repairing hearing damage. This may involve recruiting homing factors to the damaged area and inducing transdifferentiation into inner hair cells or neurons, or regenerating sensory hair cells to restore hearing[29]. In animal models, stem cell therapy has shown significant effects for SNHL, and some studies indicated that intravenous transplantation of human umbilical cord blood MSCs can restore hearing in deaf animal models[30].

Targeted drug delivery

Researchers have developed new gel formulations, such as AC102, for direct intratympanic injection to deliver drugs specifically to inner ear cells[31]. This method reduces systemic exposure and minimizes adverse side effects, providing a more precise treatment approach. It overcomes the limitations of traditional intratympanic drug injections, such as dexamethasone and type-1 insulin-like growth factor, which do not remain in the middle ear for long. Animal experiments have shown increased hair cell numbers and hearing restoration[32].

Targeted ion channel therapy

Researchers are developing therapies targeting specific ion channels to improve natural hearing in patients with permanent SNHL[33]. Many studies focus on the Kv3 family of channels, crucial for high-frequency sound processing. Noise exposure leads to hearing loss and tinnitus in mice and humans due to overactive auditory brainstem neurons, related to reduced Kv7.2/3 (KCNQ2/3) potassium channel activity. Non-specific KCNQ channel agonists such as RL-81 can prevent noise-induced tinnitus, showing potential as a new treatment for noise-induced hearing loss[34].

Gene therapy

Gene therapy is a significant innovation in treating SNHL, especially for hearing loss caused by specific gene mutations. The Otoferlin (OTOF)-GT project aims to restore hearing loss caused by OTOF gene defects by providing a normal OTOF gene. Results show that this gene therapy effectively treats childhood SNHL[35]. Additionally, research using special viral vectors, such as adeno-associated virus-mediated gene therapy for acquired hearing loss, has shown positive results, with future steps to verify its safety, sustained gene expression in non-dividing cells, target cell specificity, non-pathogenicity, and low immunogenicity[36].

The diversity and innovation in hearing treatment and rehabilitation offer more effective options for SNHL patients. However, these technologies are still in the research or preclinical stages, requiring further validation and development for clinical application. Each method has specific indications and limitations, necessitating a comprehensive evaluation of suitable treatment strategies based on individual patient conditions.

Foot reflexology

Foot reflexology involves applying gentle pressure to specific areas of the feet to trigger functional responses in the body[36]. Current research on its effectiveness for various diseases, including cancer, MS, diabetes, and SNHL, is mixed and requires comprehensive consideration and judgment. As a non-invasive supplementary therapy, reflexology's effectiveness varies across studies with varying quality.

A 2010 study concluded that there is no convincing evidence to support reflexology's effectiveness for any specific disease. However, some research suggests potential benefits in certain cases, such as pain relief, MS, diabetes, and pediatric conditions. Sajadi et al[37] reported positive effects of foot reflexology on managing constipation in 63 MS patients. Toledo et al[36] found that reflexology influenced muscle activation patterns and plantar pressure parameters in people with diabetic neuropathy. Miralizadeh et al[38] observed that palm and foot massage helped reduce respiratory distress in preterm infants receiving non-invasive ventilation. These studies indicate the potential benefits of reflexology, such as fatigue relief, anxiety reduction, acute or chronic pain management, improved sleep quality, and physiological improvements. They also provide insights into reflexology's possible physiological mechanisms, such as regulating blood flow to affect visceral organ function and stimulating the pituitary gland to release endorphins and enkephalins.

Although reflexology is considered to have certain benefits in improving symptoms and quality of life[9], these studies often have significant methodological limitations. Thus, evidence is insufficient to confirm reflexology's effectiveness and scientific validity. Research design challenges, particularly in achieving blinding, make it difficult to evaluate the therapy's effects accurately.

To date, research on reflexology's impact on hearing restoration is limited, and the existing evidence is primarily based on case studies or studies with design limitations. For instance, in the case report of a child with SNHL, hearing thresholds normalized after 24 weeks of foot stimulation, but the clinical trial lacked a control group[39]. Currently, there is no widely accepted scientific evidence that foot reflexology can directly influence hearing restoration.

CONCLUSION

While reflexology shows potential benefits in some areas, its effectiveness in hearing restoration remains unproven. Future high-quality research is needed to explore reflexology's role in hearing recovery and other diseases, providing a clearer theoretical foundation for this treatment method.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A

Novelty: Grade A

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A

Scientific Significance: Grade A

P-Reviewer: Yücel O S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang XD

References
1.  Lieu JEC, Kenna M, Anne S, Davidson L. Hearing Loss in Children: A Review. JAMA. 2020;324:2195-2205.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 86]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 193]  [Article Influence: 48.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Fernandes R, Hariprasad S, Kumar VK. Physical therapy management for balance deficits in children with hearing impairments: A systematic review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2015;51:753-758.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Rajendran V, Roy FG. An overview of motor skill performance and balance in hearing impaired children. Ital J Pediatr. 2011;37:33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 36]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37]  [Article Influence: 2.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Birru B, Veit JGS, Arrigali EM, Van Tine J, Barrett-Catton E, Tonnerre Z, Diaz P, Serban MA. Hyaluronic acid-ibuprofen conjugation: a novel ototherapeutic approach protecting inner ear cells from inflammation-mediated damage. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1355283.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Paciello F, Pisani A, Rolesi R, Montuoro R, Mohamed-Hizam V, Boni G, Ripoli C, Galli J, Sisto R, Fetoni AR, Grassi C. Oxidative stress and inflammation cause auditory system damage via glial cell activation and dysregulated expression of gap junction proteins in an experimental model of styrene-induced oto/neurotoxicity. J Neuroinflammation. 2024;21:4.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Lu Y, Zhou L, Imrit TS, Liu A. Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Children: Clinical Characteristics, Etiology, Treatment Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40:446-453.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Zhou Y, Fang C, Yuan L, Guo M, Xu X, Shao A, Zhang A, Zhou D. Redox homeostasis dysregulation in noise-induced hearing loss: oxidative stress and antioxidant treatment. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;52:78.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Kishimoto-Urata M, Urata S, Fujimoto C, Yamasoba T. Role of Oxidative Stress and Antioxidants in Acquired Inner Ear Disorders. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11:1469.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 11.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Blackburn L, Hill C, Lindsey AL, Sinnott LT, Thompson K, Quick A. Effect of Foot Reflexology and Aromatherapy on Anxiety and Pain During Brachytherapy for Cervical Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2021;48:265-276.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Liu CC, Anne S, Horn DL. Advances in Management of Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019;52:847-861.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Virzob CRB, Poenaru M, Morar R, Horhat ID, Balica NC, Prathipati R, Moleriu RD, Toma AO, Juganaru I, Bloanca V, Chicin GN, Fericean RM, Domuta EM, Iurciuc M, Iurciuc S. Efficacy of Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric and Adult Patients with Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Analysis in a Developing European Country. J Clin Med. 2023;12:2948.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Kitterick PT, Smith SN, Lucas L. Hearing Instruments for Unilateral Severe-to-Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ear Hear. 2016;37:495-507.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 77]  [Article Influence: 12.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Pegan A, Ries M, Ajduk J, Bedeković V, Ivkić M, Trotić R. Active middle ear vibrant soundbridge sound implant. Acta Clin Croat. 2019;58:348-353.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Cremers CW, O'Connor AF, Helms J, Roberson J, Clarós P, Frenzel H, Profant M, Schmerber S, Streitberger C, Baumgartner WD, Orfila D, Pringle M, Cenjor C, Giarbini N, Jiang D, Snik AF. International consensus on Vibrant Soundbridge® implantation in children and adolescents. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74:1267-1269.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 57]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 61]  [Article Influence: 4.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Anne S, Brown KD, Goldberg DM, Adunka OF, Kenna M, Chien W, Teagle H, Zwolan TA, Sydlowski SA, Roush P, Buchman CA. Pediatric Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Minimum Test Battery and Referral Criteria for Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022;166:405-409.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Liang S, Soli SD, Zheng Y, Li G, Meng Z. Initial classification of pediatric hearing impairment using behavioral measures of early prelingual auditory development. Int J Audiol. 2016;55:224-231.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Zhang H, Ma W, Ding H, Zhang Y. Sustainable Benefits of High Variability Phonetic Training in Mandarin-speaking Kindergarteners With Cochlear Implants: Evidence From Categorical Perception of Lexical Tones. Ear Hear. 2023;44:990-1006.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Miller SE, Zhang Y, Nelson PB. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016;59:90-98.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Castellanos I, Kronenberger WG, Beer J, Henning SC, Colson BG, Pisoni DB. Preschool speech intelligibility and vocabulary skills predict long-term speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation in early childhood. Cochlear Implants Int. 2014;15:200-210.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lu X, Qin Z. Auditory and language development in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;107:183-189.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Zhang B, Qiu J, Yu Y, Hu C, Zhu Z, Yu C, Yin L, Zhong M. Influence of family environment on the development of speech and language in pre-lingually deaf children after cochlear implantation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2020;45:466-470.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Maluleke NP, Khoza-Shangase K, Kanji A. An Integrative Review of Current Practice Models and/or Process of Family-Centered Early Intervention for Children Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Fam Community Health. 2021;44:59-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Moeller MP, Gale E, Szarkowski A, Smith T, Birdsey BC, Moodie STF, Carr G, Stredler-Brown A, Yoshinaga-Itano C, Holzinger D; FCEI-DHH International Consensus Panel. Family-Centered Early Intervention Deaf/Hard of Hearing (FCEI-DHH): Foundation Principles. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024;29:SI53-SI63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Zhang FH, Jin XM, Shen XM, Wu H. [The efficacy of early intervention for infants and toddlers with hearing loss]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006;86:2836-2840.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
25.  Quan YZ, Wei W, Ergin V, Rameshbabu AP, Huang M, Tian C, Saladi SV, Indzhykulian AA, Chen ZY. Reprogramming by drug-like molecules leads to regeneration of cochlear hair cell-like cells in adult mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2023;120:e2215253120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 9.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Shu Y, Li W, Huang M, Quan YZ, Scheffer D, Tian C, Tao Y, Liu X, Hochedlinger K, Indzhykulian AA, Wang Z, Li H, Chen ZY. Renewed proliferation in adult mouse cochlea and regeneration of hair cells. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5530.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 65]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68]  [Article Influence: 13.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Kanzaki S, Toyoda M, Umezawa A, Ogawa K. Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy and Inner Ear Regeneration for Hearing Loss: A Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:5764.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Maharajan N, Cho GW, Jang CH. Therapeutic Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Cochlear Regeneration. In Vivo. 2021;35:13-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 3.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
29.  Warnecke A, Harre J, Shew M, Mellott AJ, Majewski I, Durisin M, Staecker H. Successful Treatment of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: An RNAseq Analysis of Protective/Repair Pathways. Front Cell Neurosci. 2021;15:656930.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Kim SY, Lee JE, Kang SH, Lee SM, Jeon J, Lee DR. The Protective Effects of Human Embryonic Stem Cell-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Noise-Induced Hearing Loss of Rats. Cells. 2022;11:3524.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Choi MY, Yeo SW, Park KH. Hearing restoration in a deaf animal model with intravenous transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from human umbilical cord blood. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2012;427:629-636.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
32.  Erni ST, Gill JC, Palaferri C, Fernandes G, Buri M, Lazarides K, Grandgirard D, Edge ASB, Leib SL, Roccio M. Hair Cell Generation in Cochlear Culture Models Mediated by Novel γ-Secretase Inhibitors. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:710159.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
33.  Marinos L, Kouvaros S, Bizup B, Hambach B, Wipf P, Tzounopoulos T. Transient Delivery of a KCNQ2/3-Specific Channel Activator 1 Week After Noise Trauma Mitigates Noise-Induced Tinnitus. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2021;22:127-139.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
34.  Lv J, Wang H, Cheng X, Chen Y, Wang D, Zhang L, Cao Q, Tang H, Hu S, Gao K, Xun M, Wang J, Wang Z, Zhu B, Cui C, Gao Z, Guo L, Yu S, Jiang L, Yin Y, Zhang J, Chen B, Wang W, Chai R, Chen ZY, Li H, Shu Y. AAV1-hOTOF gene therapy for autosomal recessive deafness 9: a single-arm trial. Lancet. 2024;403:2317-2325.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 23]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Wu F, Sambamurti K, Sha S. Current Advances in Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Gene Therapy to Prevent Acquired Hearing Loss. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2022;23:569-578.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Toledo TG, Freire LAM, Reis LMD, Terra AMSV, Santos ATS. Effect of Foot Reflexology on Muscle Electrical Activity, Pressure, Plantar Distribution, and Body Sway in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:14547.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Sajadi M, Davodabady F, Naseri-Salahshour V, Harorani M, Ebrahimi-Monfared M. The effect of foot reflexology on constipation and quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis. A randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2020;48:102270.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Miralizadeh A, Peyman A, Jamali Soltani N, Ashktorab T. Comparison of the Effect of Foot and Palm Reflexology Massage on Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infants under Noninvasive Ventilation. Complement Med Res. 2022;29:100-108.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Lee YJ, Chen MQ, Dong J. Effect of foot reflexology on an infant with sensorineural hearing loss: A case report. World J Clin Cases. 2024;12:1437-1441.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]