Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2025; 13(7): 92254
Published online Mar 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i7.92254
Internal hernia as a rare cause of small bowel obstruction: An insight from 13 years of experience
Payal Kaw, Anu Behari, Supriya Sharma, Ashok Kumar, Rajneesh K Singh, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow 226014, UP, India
ORCID number: Payal Kaw (0000-0001-7203-2341); Anu Behari (0000-0003-4959-8384); Supriya Sharma (0000-0002-3183-0483); Ashok Kumar (0000-0002-8540-7971); Rajneesh K Singh (0000-0002-6977-9214).
Author contributions: Kaw P collected the data, reviewed the literature, and contributed to conceptualization and manuscript writing; Behari A designed the research study, supervised the process of data collection and manuscript writing, and critically reviewed the study; Sharma S, Kumar A, and Singh RK were responsible for critical review of the manuscript; all of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript to be published.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and granted an exemption.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrolment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare no conflict of interest in publishing the manuscript.
Data sharing statement: No additional information to disclose.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Anu Behari, MBBS, MS, Professor, Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rae Bareli Road, Lucknow 226014, UP, India. anubehari@yahoo.co.in
Received: January 20, 2024
Revised: September 21, 2024
Accepted: October 8, 2024
Published online: March 6, 2025
Processing time: 310 Days and 1.9 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Internal hernia (IH) is a rare culprit of small bowel obstruction (SBO) with an incidence of < 1%. It poses a considerable diagnostic challenge requiring a high index of suspicion to prevent misdiagnosis, improper treatment, and subsequent morbidity and mortality.

AIM

To determine the clinico-demographic profile, radiological and operative findings, and postoperative course of patients with IH and its association with SBO.

METHODS

Medical records of 586 patients with features of SBO presenting at a tertiary care centre at Lucknow, India between September 2010 and August 2023 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Out of 586 patients, 7 (1.2%) were diagnosed with IH. Among these, 4 had congenital IH and 3 had acquired IH. The male-to-female ratio was 4:3. The median age at presentation was 32 years. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) was the most reliable investigation for preoperative identification, demonstrating mesenteric whirling and clumped-up bowel loops. Left paraduodenal hernia and transmesenteric hernia occurred with an equal frequency (approximately 43% each). Intraoperatively, one patient was found to have bowel ischemia and one had associated malrotation of gut. During follow-up, no recurrences were reported.

CONCLUSION

IH, being a rare cause, must be considered as a differential diagnosis for SBO, especially in young patients in their 30s or with unexplained abdominal pain or discomfort post-surgery. A rapid imaging evaluation, preferably with CECT, is necessary to aid in an early diagnosis and prompt intervention, thereby reducing financial burden related to unnecessary investigations and preventing the morbidity and mortality associated with closed-loop obstruction and strangulation of the bowel.

Key Words: Paraduodenal hernia; Internal hernia; Mesenteric whirling; Bowel obstruction; Computed tomography

Core Tip: Internal hernia (IH) represents less than 1% of all causes of small bowel obstruction. Being rare, IH poses a considerable diagnostic challenge. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography is the most reliable investigation for preoperative identification. A rapid imaging evaluation is necessary to aid in an early diagnosis and prompt intervention, thereby reducing financial burden related to unnecessary investigations and preventing the morbidity and mortality associated with closed-loop obstruction and strangulation of the bowel. Laparoscopic surgery is a safe option for uncomplicated IHs.



INTRODUCTION

An internal hernia (IH) occurs due to the protrusion of an abdominal viscus within the abdominal or pelvic cavity through apertures in the peritoneum, mesentery, or omentum[1]. These apertures could be present congenitally or acquired following surgery or trauma. Congenital IH (CIH) can occur via normal anatomical foramen/fossa or abnormal congenital defects through the layer(s) of peritoneal reflections[2-4]. Congenital defects in the rotation of the intestine and peritoneal attachments are important factors predisposing to internal herniation[1,5]. Acquired IH (AIH) occurs through surgically created or post-traumatic defects in the mesentery[5].

Although with a relatively low overall incidence of < 1%, IH represents up to 5.8% of all small bowel obstructions (SBO). Despite being relatively rare, it significantly contributes to both acute and chronic SBO[2,3,6,7]. The proportion of patients with acquired hernias is on an increasing trend considering the growing popularity of surgeries involving Roux-en-Y reconstruction, like bariatric surgery[4,8].

IHs pose a considerable diagnostic challenge due to their ability to clinically mimic other abdominal conditions[4,7]. Thus, a high index of clinical and radiological suspicion is required to prevent misdiagnosis, improper treatment, and subsequent morbidity and mortality.

Here we share our experience of 13 years in dealing with IHs at a tertiary care hospital in Lucknow, India.

MATRIAL AND METHODS

Medical records of 586 patients presenting at our centre with features of SBO between September 2010 and August 2023 were reviewed. All patients with IH detected either preoperatively based on radiographic evidence or at surgical exploration were included in the study. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) preoperatively. Details of demography, presentation, radiology, operative findings, and procedure were extracted and analysed.

RESULTS

Out of 586 patients, 7 (1.2%) were diagnosed with IH. Among these, 4 had congenital IH and 3 had acquired IH. The male-to-female ratio was 4:3, whereas in the group with CIH, the ratio was equal. The age at presentation of patients with IH ranged between 26 years and 64 years, with a median age of 33.5 years in the CIH group and 31 years in the AIH group. The demographic profile, hallmark radiological feature, and type of IH observed are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic profile, hallmark radiological feature, and type of internal hernia observed in our patients.
Age (in years)/gender
Type/location
Symptom duration
Time of diagnosis
Characteristic imaging finding
Presentation
Intraoperative finding
Follow-up
Congenital internal hernia
35/FLeft PDH1 yearIntraoperativeNoneAIOOpen repair (2013): No intra-peritoneal adhesions. Lenzert’s defect identified. No bowel ischemia/ malrotationDischarged on POD14. No recurrence. Last follow-up in 2023
32/MRight PDHChildhoodPreoperativeClumped-up bowel loops in right lumbar regionCIOLaparoscopic repair (2014): Dilated stomach and proximal duodenum with duodeno-jejunal flexure to the right of midline suggesting malroation. Entire small bowel formed the content of hernia and was lying behind the right mesocolon. No bowel ischemiaDischarged on POD 10. No readmission. Last follow-up in 2023
26/FLeft PDH3 yearsPreoperativeClumped-up bowel loops in left anterior pararenal space behind IMVCIOLaparoscopic repair (2022): Lenzert’s defect identified with small bowel loops about 10 cm distal to DJ flexure as content. No bowel ischemia/malrotationDischarged on POD 3. Readmitted on POD 7 with recurrent vomiting, no recurrence found. Last follow-up in 2023
36/MLeft PDH11 monthsPreoperativeClumped-up bowel loops in left anterior pararenal space behind IMV and ascending left colic artery with mesenteric fat stranding and oedemaCIOLaparoscopic repair (2023): Lenzert’s defect identified with small bowel loops about 20 cm distal to DJ flexure as content. No bowel ischemia/ malrotationDischarged on POD 5. No recurrence. Last follow-up in 2023
Acquired internal hernia
31/FTrans-mesenteric via JJ site (post lateral pancreaticojejunostomy)1 yearPreoperativeMesenteric whirlingCIOOpen repair (2012): Omental/parietal adhesions. Distal jejunum and proximal ileum herniated through the JJ site mesenteric window. Small defect also noted in the mesocolic window of the Roux loop. No bowel ischemiaNo recurrence of IH. However, required admission in view of primary disease (pain and brittle diabetes related to cervical chest pain). Last follow-up in 2022
64/MTrans-mesenteric via mesocolon anterior to GJ site (post RYGJ)1 yearPreoperativeMesenteric whirling and clumping of bowel loops near GJ siteCIOOpen repair (2014): Mild free fluid in the peritoneal cavity. A 5 × 5 cm defect in the mesocolon anterior to GJ. No bowel ischemiaRequired readmission 1 month postoperatively in view of melena. Developed hypoglycaemic seizures during the hospital admission. Was managed conservatively and discharged. Subsequently lost to follow-up
22/MTrans-mesenteric via previous ileoileostomy site (post TPC with IPAA)4 daysIntraoperativeNoneAIOOpen repair (2021): Dense omental and interbowel adhesions present. One litre of serohemorrhagic fluid present. Small bowel loops herniated through mesenteric window of previous ileo-ileal anastomotic site-gangrenous. 1.5 feet gangrenous ileal segment resected. End ileostomy fashioned 8 feet distal to DJ site in right lower quadrant and distal mucus fistula in lower end of midlineElective admission for restoration of bowel continuity 3 months later. Subsequently no readmission. No recurrence. Last follow-up in 2023

Almost a third (29%) of the patients did not have any preoperative diagnosis or suspicion of IH and were identified intraoperatively. The majority of the patients (86%) had multiple symptomatic episodes over a median duration of 1 year, with pain in the abdomen and distension being the most frequent complaints. CECT was found to be the most reliable investigation for preoperative identification. The characteristic findings included the presence of mesenteric whirling and clumped-up bowel loops at an abnormal location (Figure 1). Laparoscopy was performed in 3 cases, while 4 patients underwent laparotomy. Left paraduodenal hernia and transmesenteric AIH occurred with an equal frequency of approximately 43% each (Figure 2). During follow-up, no recurrences were reported.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography in a case of left paraduodenal hernia. A: Clumped-up bowel loops in left anterior renal space; B: Presence of mesenteric whirling.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Steps of laparoscopic left paraduodenal hernia repair. A: Port placement includes a 10 mm optical port via the umbilicus (1), two working ports (2 and 3) of 5 mm, and an assistant port (4) of 5 mm. The port placement may vary as per surgeon’s preference; B and C: Laparoscopic view of left paraduodenal hernia repair demonstrating entrapped bowel loops below the mesocolon; D: As the mesocolon is lifted, Lenzert’s hernia defect can be demonstrated with small bowel loops as content; E: The contents are reduced by gentle traction; F: Defect is closed using non absorbable sutures.
DISCUSSION

IH as a cause of SBO largely remains under-diagnosed, with an overall incidence of < 1% and up to 5.8% among patients presenting with SBO[1,9,10-12]. In our study, IH accounted for only 1.2% (n = 7/586) of all the causes of SBO.

Welch[13] traditionally classified IH based on the anatomical location of the hernia defect into several main types: (1) Paraduodenal (left > right) (53%); (2) Pericecal hernia (13%); (3) Through the foramen of Winslow (8%); (4) Transmesenteric (8%); (5) Intersigmoid (6%); (6) Supravesical and pelvic (6%); and (7) Transomental (1%-4%). Doishita et al[14] classified the IH in three main groups according to the type of hernia orifice: (1) Herniation through a normal foramen; (2) An unusual peritoneal fossa or recess into the retroperitoneum; and (3) An abnormal opening in a mesentery or peritoneal ligament.

With the growing popularity of surgeries involving Roux-en Y reconstruction and an improvement in diagnostic modalities like computed tomography (CT) scans, the incidence of transmesenteric AIH is on the rise[15,16].

IH has a wide spectrum of presentation, varying from being asymptomatic to chronic abdominal pain or even life-threatening closed-loop obstruction with bowel ischemia[1,16]. In the present study, one patient with an initial presentation of acute SBO was found to have bowel ischemia intraoperatively, and the remaining six patients had chronic SBO. Out of these patients, two underwent surgery in an acute setting, and one experienced bowel ischemia.

Despite preoperative imaging in the acute setting, a definitive diagnosis remains elusive. The presence of an acute episode is more predictive of bowel ischemia while a history of chronic abdominal pain suggests that patients have episodic spontaneous reducible IH with a lower risk of incarceration of the small bowel[16].

This non-specific clinical presentation often leads to a delayed diagnosis and, consequently, inappropriate treatment[7]. One patient in our study with no evidence of IH preoperatively was empirically given a full course of anti-tubercular treatment in a peripheral centre, considering that abdominal tuberculosis is a very common differential diagnosis for recurrent subacute intestinal obstruction in a virgin abdomen in our country[17]. Another patient was given a diagnosis of gastroparesis before being diagnosed with an IH on a CT scan.

With the improved radiological armamentarium and wider availability, CT scanning has become the first-line imaging technique in the detection of SBO, with a sensitivity and specificity of 94%-100% and 90%-95%, respectively[9,15,18]. In our study, it was found that CT scans played an important role in the preoperative diagnosis of IH with a sensitivity of 71.4% (n = 5/7). Although one out of five patients required a CT scan twice before being diagnosed, this could be explained by the intermittent herniation of the bowel into the herniated sac. The key findings pointing towards IH include the presence of a cluster of dilated small bowel loops within an abnormal anatomic location in the setting of SBO, displacement of key mesenteric vessels, convergence of vessels and mesenteric fat at the hernia orifice, engorgement, crowding, twisting, displacement of surrounding structures around the hernia sac, stretching of mesenteric vessels and mesenteric fat heterogenicity, and signs of intestinal ischemia like bowel wall thickening and altered or absent perfusion if strangulation is present[2,7,14,16]. In older literature, the gastrointestinal (GI) contrast series has been considered to be the most diagnostic, with hallmark features including sacculation and crowding together of loops of small bowel contained in the herniated sac; disturbed arrangement and abnormal location of the small intestine within the confines of the peritoneal cavity; and segmental dilatation and prolonged stasis of barium in the herniated bowel[5,19].

In our study, 3 out of 7 patients underwent GI contrast series, and none were conclusive of IH, probably because the series was done during the asymptomatic phase of patients with chronic intestinal obstruction. In our series, patients with acute presentations underwent open surgery, while those with chronic presentations, preferably, underwent laparoscopic repair. The first ever laparoscopic repair of IH was reported in 1998, and ever since, minimally invasive operations have been popularized as a safe procedure in non-obstructed cases[20,21]. However, the upcoming literature suggested an increased popularity and safety of laparoscopic surgery even in selected cases of bowel obstruction[22-24]. The main limiting factors being complex aetiology of bowel obstruction and lack of sufficient technical skill and experience[22-24]. At our institution we prefer to use open surgical technique in patients with bowel obstruction presenting in the acute setting where the suspicion of perforation or bowel ischemia is high.

There was no intraoperative complication like a visceral injury, inferior mesenteric vein injury, or hernia recurrence recorded in our series. Various series report a complication rate of approximately 7%[21,22]. Table 2 compares the results of various studies available in the literature for the IH with a focus on CIH[25-28]. Patients with severe abdominal pain should be promptly investigated for hernia recurrence.

Table 2 Comparison of results of various studies available in the literature.
Ref.
Number of patients with IH
Presentation
Preoperative diagnosis
Type of surgery (laparoscopic/open)
Outcome
Newsom et al [25], (1986)14 [CIH (n = 8), AIH (n = 6)]AIO (n = 14), CIO (n = none)None (based on roentgenogram)All open; operated as emergency surgery; 9 required bowel resectionPostoperative mortality: 31%
Ghiassi et al[26], (2007)49 [CIH (n = 15), AIH (n = 34)]AIO (n = 37), CIO (n = 11)4 (based on computed tomography scan)Open (n = 31); laproscopy (n = 13); laproscopy converted to open (n = 5). All operated as emergency surgery; 11 required bowel resectionsPostoperative mortality: 2%. Morbidity: 12%
Poves et al[27], (2014)6 [CIH (n = 2), AIH (n = 4)]AIO (n = 6), CIO (n = none)NALaproscopy (n = 4), laproscopy converted to open (n = 2). All 6 operated as emergency surgery; 2 required bowel resectionsNA
John et al[28], (2016)6 [CIH (n = 4), AIH (n = 2)]AIO (n = 6), CIO (n = none)1
All open; operated as emergency surgery; 3 required bowel resections
Postoperative mortality: None. Morbidity: NA
Present Study7 [CIH (n = 4), AIH (n = 3)]AIO (n = 2), CIO (n = 5)5Open (n = 3), laproscopy (n = 4). The 2 operated as emergency and 5 as semi-elective surgery; 1 required bowel resectionPostoperative mortality: None. Morbidity: 14%
CONCLUSION

IH, being a rare cause, must be considered as a differential diagnosis for bowel obstruction, especially in young patients in their 30s or with unexplained abdominal pain or discomfort post-surgery. A rapid imaging evaluation, preferably with CECT, is necessary to aid in an early diagnosis and prompt intervention, thereby reducing the financial burden related to unnecessary investigations and preventing the morbidity and mortality associated with closed-loop obstruction and strangulation of the bowel.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: India

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade C

Creativity or Innovation: Grade C

Scientific Significance: Grade C

P-Reviewer: Ghirardelli L S-Editor: Luo ML L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Zhang L

References
1.  Ghahremani GG. Internal abdominal hernias. Surg Clin North Am. 1984;64:393-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 113]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 117]  [Article Influence: 2.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Kelahan L, Menias CO, Chow L. A review of internal hernias related to congenital peritoneal fossae and apertures. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46:1825-1836.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Amberg JR. Dynamic radiology of the abdomen: Normal and pathologic anatomy. Jama. 1983;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
4.  Martin LC, Merkle EM, Thompson WM. Review of internal hernias: radiographic and clinical findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:703-717.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 360]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 349]  [Article Influence: 19.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Johnson JR. Internal hernia; review of literature and report of an obstructed transmesenteric hernia and of an intersigmoid hernia. Arch Surg (1920). 1950;60:1171-1182.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Ghahremani GG  Abdominal and pelvic hernias. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology 2000.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
7.  Lanzetta MM, Masserelli A, Addeo G, Cozzi D, Maggialetti N, Danti G, Bartolini L, Pradella S, Giovagnoni A, Miele V. Internal hernias: a difficult diagnostic challenge. Review of CT signs and clinical findings. Acta Biomed. 2019;90:20-37.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Karcz WK, Zhou C, Daoud M, Gong Z, Blazejczyk K, Keck T, Matlok M, Zimmermann M, Kuehling A, Fink J. Modification of internal hernia classification system after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y bariatric surgery. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2015;10:197-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Takeyama N, Gokan T, Ohgiya Y, Satoh S, Hashizume T, Hataya K, Kushiro H, Nakanishi M, Kusano M, Munechika H. CT of internal hernias. Radiographics. 2005;25:997-1015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 215]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 179]  [Article Influence: 9.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Hassani KI, Aggouri Y, Laalim SA, Toughrai I, Mazaz K. Left paraduodenal hernia: A rare cause of acute abdomen. Pan Afr Med J. 2014;17:230.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Gore RM, Ghahremani GG, Marn CA.   Hernias and abdominal wall pathology. In: Core RM, Levine MS. Textbook of Gastrointestinal Radiology (Third Edition). Saunders, 2007: 2149-2175.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Hansmann GH, Morton SA. Intra-abdominal hernia: report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Surg. 1939;39:973-986.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Welch CE. Intestinal obstruction. Acad Med. 1958;33:90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Doishita S, Takeshita T, Uchima Y, Kawasaki M, Shimono T, Yamashita A, Sugimoto M, Ninoi T, Shima H, Miki Y. Internal Hernias in the Era of Multidetector CT: Correlation of Imaging and Surgical Findings. Radiographics. 2016;36:88-106.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 66]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 59]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Blachar A, Federle MP, Brancatelli G, Peterson MS, Oliver JH 3rd, Li W. Radiologist performance in the diagnosis of internal hernia by using specific CT findings with emphasis on transmesenteric hernia. Radiology. 2001;221:422-428.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 123]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 103]  [Article Influence: 4.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Fan HP, Yang AD, Chang YJ, Juan CW, Wu HP. Clinical spectrum of internal hernia: a surgical emergency. Surg Today. 2008;38:899-904.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 40]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 40]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Ionescu S, Nicolescu AC, Madge OL, Marincas M, Radu M, Simion L. Differential Diagnosis of Abdominal Tuberculosis in the Adult-Literature Review. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11:2362.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Boudiaf M, Soyer P, Terem C, Pelage JP, Maissiat E, Rymer R. Ct evaluation of small bowel obstruction. Radiographics. 2001;21:613-624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 117]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 89]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Nuño-Guzmán CM, Arróniz-Jáuregui J, Hernández-González C, Reyes-Macías F, Nava-Garibaldi R, Guerrero-Díaz F, Martínez-Chávez J, Solís-Ugalde J. Right paraduodenal hernia in an adult patient: diagnostic approach and surgical management. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2011;5:479-486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Uematsu T, Kitamura H, Iwase M, Yamashita K, Ogura H, Nakamuka T, Oguri H. Laparoscopic repair of a paraduodenal hernia. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:50-52.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 58]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 66]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Giri OA, Bhat SN, Kuppusamy B. Lessons learnt in the management of paraduodenal hernias: a case series. Surg Endosc. 2024;38:443-448.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Khalaileh A, Schlager A, Bala M, Abu-Gazala S, Elazary R, Rivkind AI, Mintz Y. Left laparoscopic paraduodenal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1486-1489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Harvitkar RU, Kumar PH, Joshi A. Role of Laparoscopy in the Surgical Management of Acute Small Bowel Obstruction: Fact or Fiction? Cureus. 2021;13:e18828.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Szeliga J, Jackowski M. Laparoscopy in small bowel obstruction - current status - review. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017;12:455-460.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 1.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Newsom BD, Kukora JS. Congenital and acquired internal hernias: unusual causes of small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg. 1986;152:279-285.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 147]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 147]  [Article Influence: 3.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Ghiassi S, Nguyen SQ, Divino CM, Byrn JC, Schlager A. Internal hernias: clinical findings, management, and outcomes in 49 nonbariatric cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:291-295.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 59]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 62]  [Article Influence: 3.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
27.  Poves I, Sebastián Valverde E, Puig Companyó S, Dorcaratto D, Membrilla E, Pons MJ, Grande L. Results of a laparoscopic approach for the treatment of acute small bowel obstruction due to adhesions and internal hernias. Cir Esp. 2014;92:336-340.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  John RJ, Ulahannan SE, Kurien JS, Joseph A, Kurien AS, Varghese SA, Thomas B, Varghese F. Rare Hernias Presenting as Acute Abdomen- A Case Series. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:PR01-PR04.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]