Editorial Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2025; 13(1): 96578
Published online Jan 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i1.96578
Advancement in utilization of magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers in the understanding of schizophrenia
Aidan K Tirpack, Danyaal G Buttar, Department of Psychiatry, Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Buies Creek, NC 27506, United States
Mandeep Kaur, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Mercyhealth Hospital and Trauma Center, Janesville, WI 53548, United States
ORCID number: Mandeep Kaur (0000-0002-2795-6198).
Author contributions: Tirpack AK and Kaur M designed the research study; Tirpack AK, Buttar DG, Kaur M performed the research and wrote the manuscript; Tirpack AK, Buttar DG, Kaur M revised the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors have any conflict of interest to report.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Mandeep Kaur, MD, Associate Professor, Staff Physician, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, Mercyhealth Hospital and Trauma Center, Mercyhealth Behavioral Health Clinic, 903 Mineral Point Ave, Janesville, WI 53548, United States. mandy.drmandeep@gmail.com
Received: May 10, 2024
Revised: September 17, 2024
Accepted: September 27, 2024
Published online: January 6, 2025
Processing time: 181 Days and 4.4 Hours

Abstract

Historically, psychiatric diagnoses have been made based on patient’s reported symptoms applying the criteria from diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. The utilization of neuroimaging or biomarkers to make the diagnosis and manage psychiatric disorders remains a distant goal. There have been several studies that examine brain imaging in psychiatric disorders, but more work is needed to elucidate the complexities of the human brain. In this editorial, we examine two articles by Xu et al and Stoyanov et al, that show developments in the direction of using neuroimaging to examine the brains of people with schizophrenia and depression. Xu et al used magnetic resonance imaging to examine the brain structure of patients with schizophrenia, in addition to examining neurotransmitter levels as biomarkers. Stoyanov et al used functional magnetic resonance imaging to look at modulation of different neural circuits by diagnostic-specific scales in patients with schizophrenia and depression. These two studies provide crucial evidence in advancing our understanding of the brain in prevalent psychiatric disorders.

Key Words: Schizophrenia; Magnetic resonance imaging; Biomarkers; Neurotransmitters; Psychiatric disorders

Core Tip: Schizophrenia is a serious psychiatric condition that has life-long implications for the individual as well as their family. The underlying psychopathology is still unclear and evolving. With advancements in the field of neuroimaging and neurotransmitters the understanding of the disorder is gradually improving, however, a lot of work is still needed in this area. In this editorial article we briefly discuss what we already know and how recently published articles help to advance our knowledge about schizophrenia.



INTRODUCTION

Schizophrenia is a complex neuropsychiatric condition that has a long-lasting impact on an individual’s functioning in all areas. Schizophrenia is associated with high unemployment rates, poor dietary habits, increased rates of smoking, and comorbid substance use that contribute to a reduced life expectancy of 13-15 years[1]. Our understanding of schizophrenia has come a long way from Emil Kraepelin’s distinguishment of dementia praecox (schizophrenia) to manic-depressive psychosis in 1893, to Eugen Bleuler coining the term schizophrenia (previously known as dementia praecox) in 1908, to the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) classification in 2013. The DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia include positive symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations; disorganized speech, grossly disorganized or catatonic behavior and negative symptoms such as decreased motivation and diminished expressiveness; two or more of these must persist for a period of one month or longer[1]. Additionally, cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia include deficits in working memory, executive function, and information processing.

NEUROIMAGING AND NEUROTRANSMITTERS IMPLICATED IN SCHIZOPHRENIA

During Kraepelin and Bleuler’s time, they did not have access to our current capabilities of the neuroimaging modalities. However, even with today’s imaging tools for exploring the brain, the underlying psychopathology of schizophrenia is still not fully understood. Structural alterations associated with schizophrenia have been examined widely. Some of the consistent findings across various studies include smaller total brain volume, enlarged ventricles, and reduced hippocampal and thalamic volumes[2]. A meta-analysis utilizing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of over 4000 patients determined that patients with schizophrenia had widespread thinner cortex and smaller brain surface area[3]. Another meta-analysis of 317 studies inclusive of over 18000 patients, compared medicated and non-medicated individuals and determined that medicated schizophrenia patients had decreased intracranial and total brain volume, while medication-naive patients had increased volume reductions in the caudate nucleus and thalamus[4]. They also found that advanced gray matter reduction was associated with a longer duration of illness and a higher dose of antipsychotic medication at the time of scanning[4]. In addition to structural changes in schizophrenia, researchers have also used functional MRIs to show support for both hypofrontality, decreased prefrontal cortex activity, and hyperfrontality, increased prefrontal cortex activity[5,6]. Patients with hypofrontality were more likely to experience negative symptoms of schizophrenia, while patients with hyperfrontality were more likely to experience positive symptoms[6,7].

The two main neurotransmitters implicated in schizophrenia are dopamine and glutamate. Dopamine was first suspected to play a role in schizophrenia after recreational amphetamines induced psychotic symptoms that had similarities to schizophrenia[8]. Numerous methods including animal studies, post-mortem research, clinical effects of drugs that either block or accentuate dopaminergic neurotransmission, and positive emission tomography studies all show indirect evidence that increased dopamine signaling is associated with schizophrenia[9]. A meta-analysis of 21 studies found that patients with schizophrenia had greater elevation of dopaminergic functioning in the dorsal striatum when compared with controls[10]. However, antipsychotics that block dopamine receptors effectively treat the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but are not nearly as effective at treating the negative symptoms[8]. Further research is needed to elucidate the psychopathology behind the negative symptoms of schizophrenia to provide more effective treatment.

Glutamate is an excitatory neurotransmitter which has 2 receptors- ionotropic and metabotropic. Ionotropic N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors have been the primary focus of the underlying role of glutamatergic transmission in schizophrenia. Various animal models have shown that administration of NMDA antagonists such as ketamine and phencyclidine can induce symptoms of schizophrenia[9,11]. Several post-mortem studies targeting structural alterations of glutamate neurons have found reductions in dendrite arborization, spine density, and synaptophysin expression across frontal and temporal regions suggesting indirect evidence of role of glutamate in schizophrenia[9]. Moreover, recent research has shown evidence suggesting that the glutamatergic projections from the cortical brainstem communicate with the dopaminergic pathways and are associated with the positive symptoms of schizophrenia. Hypofunctional NMDA receptors can cause inhibition of the mesocortical dopamine pathway which may result in limited dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex with subsequent development of negative and cognitive symptoms[9]. One study showed that the results of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) were not associated with glutamine variability in the medial frontal cortex or glutamate variability in the basal ganglia[12].

Although extensive research has been conducted on the dopamine and glutamate systems independently of one another, neither one alone explains the full spectrum of schizophrenia. It is theorized that schizophrenia may be caused by the interactions of the dopamine and glutamate systems and therefore the most effective treatments will target both[13].

REVIEW OF THE STUDIES

In this article we review 2 studies published in the journal by Xu et al[14] and Stoyanov et al[15] that look at interdisciplinary connectivity and validation of schizophrenia. The studies focus on imaging modalities and quantitative measurements of neurotransmitters to show how the brain reacts and responds to certain stimuli in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. With improvements in imaging modalities, there continues to be an evolving understanding of the brain that spans all the way from neurotransmitters to the gyri.

In one of the studies that this article reviews, Xu et al[14] enrolled 97 patients with schizophrenia and 100 control patients to examine brain anatomical and neurotransmitter differences. This study aims to fill the gap in the understanding of the biological and anatomical differences between positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. First, fasting venous blood was drawn from subjects to examine the levels of dopamine, glutamate, and Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). MRIs of patient’s brains examined several craniocerebral measurements which included the distance between the midline of the brain to the inferior fornix, the vertical and horizontal distance between the corpus callosum and the inferior part of the fornix, the distance between the middle fornix, and the area of the ventricles. They further divided the case group into positive or negative symptom groups based on the results of the PANSS. They examined neurotransmitter levels and craniocerebral measurements between patients with positive or negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

There were many significant findings in this study. In terms of neurotransmitters, the patients in the case group had significantly higher dopamine levels and significantly lower glutamate and GABA levels compared to patients in the control group. Additionally, patients with positive schizophrenia symptoms had significantly higher levels of dopamine, glutamate, and GABA than those with negative symptoms. In terms of the MRI results examining brain anatomical characteristics, patients in the case group had significantly greater vertical and horizontal distances between the corpus callosum and the inferior part of the fornix and a larger ventricle area than patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in brain structural characteristics between the positive and negative symptom groups. Unfortunately, this study is limited by the number of participants and would have benefited from examining other neurotransmitters such as serotonin and acetylcholine.

Increased dopamine levels contributing to the pathology of schizophrenia has been a long-supported theory. Additionally, some studies support that patients with schizophrenia have differences in brain anatomy compared to healthy controls when analyzed at the group level[16]. It is well known that antipsychotics are less effective for patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia, however, the biological differences between the negative and positive symptoms of schizophrenia must be further investigated[17]. The results of Xu et al[14] provide possible targets to develop improved treatment methods for the negative symptoms of schizophrenia.

In the other study, Stoyanov et al[15] looked at various brain networks that were activated during responses to various items in 27 patients with Schizophrenia and 33 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). As per this study, clinical diagnostic scales identified five independent brain signals displayed on the functional magnetic resonance imaging paradigm. These components included specific locations of the brain that are activated and utilized in patients with schizophrenia and MDD. Research is still ongoing to examine the active brain regions in patients with Schizophrenia. MRI continues to be utilized in this growing field as we know that diminished brain volume occurs with the first break. The study consisted of three distinct conditions with depressive, paranoid, and neutral items and a resting condition representing a standard block. Every block contained four textual statements, paranoid and depressive sections stemming from von Zerssen subscales of depression and paranoia, whereas the neutral section was based on a general questionnaire of likes and interests.

The study by Stoyanov et al[15] displayed several significant findings in the two groups of patients while they performed the task with depressive, paranoia-specific, and neutral stimuli. One significant finding is that the component (C) 14 area in the brain within the right superior and middle temporal gyri, left middle and inferior frontal gyri, and right anterior insula was shared between all three groups of patients. Therefore, C14 is limited in the differential diagnostic algorithm between schizophrenia and MDD. The frontal motor/Language and parietal areas of the brain were shared between the MDD and schizophrenic patient groups. One specific component, C38, which entails the brain's prefrontal region, was linked to the paranoid-specific section. C22 and C36, which included areas within the posterior cingulate and precuneus, lingual and fusiform gyrus, and parahippocampal gyrus, are linked to the depression-specific items in schizophrenia as compared to the MDD patients. This study furthers our understanding of the anatomical validation between neuroimaging, neuroanatomy, and neurophysiology for common psychiatric disorders affecting our population. Another recent study by Iliuta et al[18] showed a reduction in brain volume in patients with schizophrenia. Still, it did not demonstrate specific connectivity to brain regions like Stoyanov et al[15] showed, especially in paranoid schizophrenia.

CONCLUSION

These two studies encourage clinicians in psychiatry to go beyond the traditional methods and to provide objective measures in the understanding of schizophrenia. They provide future directions for distinguishing the biological differences between positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia. However, we are not yet able to use imaging or neurotransmitters to assess diagnoses, prognosis, or which treatment may be most effective on an individual level. The differences in brain anatomy can overlap between patients with schizophrenia and controls, so we cannot yet rely on MRI findings alone to diagnose schizophrenia. These studies have certain limitations, including but not limited to the number of participants and the question of other confounding factors. The presence of other neurotransmitter involvement, such as the serotonin and cholinergic systems in schizophrenia are still evolving and warrants further investigation. There were also specific items used to assess the responses in patients, which is another limitation. These items are not standardized tools that have been seen used more broadly in psychiatry outside of the focus of these studies. It would be beneficial to use more standardized items and protocols with questionnaires to show better replicability of the results.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Psychiatry

Country of origin: United States

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade C

Novelty: Grade B

Creativity or Innovation: Grade B

Scientific Significance: Grade B

P-Reviewer: Aslam MS S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: A P-Editor: Yu HG

References
1.  Jauhar S, Johnstone M, McKenna PJ. Schizophrenia. Lancet. 2022;399:473-486.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 90]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 338]  [Article Influence: 169.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  van Erp TG, Hibar DP, Rasmussen JM, Glahn DC, Pearlson GD, Andreassen OA, Agartz I, Westlye LT, Haukvik UK, Dale AM, Melle I, Hartberg CB, Gruber O, Kraemer B, Zilles D, Donohoe G, Kelly S, McDonald C, Morris DW, Cannon DM, Corvin A, Machielsen MW, Koenders L, de Haan L, Veltman DJ, Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Gur RC, Gur RE, Potkin SG, Mathalon DH, Mueller BA, Preda A, Macciardi F, Ehrlich S, Walton E, Hass J, Calhoun VD, Bockholt HJ, Sponheim SR, Shoemaker JM, van Haren NE, Hulshoff Pol HE, Ophoff RA, Kahn RS, Roiz-Santiañez R, Crespo-Facorro B, Wang L, Alpert KI, Jönsson EG, Dimitrova R, Bois C, Whalley HC, McIntosh AM, Lawrie SM, Hashimoto R, Thompson PM, Turner JA. Subcortical brain volume abnormalities in 2028 individuals with schizophrenia and 2540 healthy controls via the ENIGMA consortium. Mol Psychiatry. 2016;21:547-553.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 637]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 640]  [Article Influence: 80.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  van Erp TGM, Walton E, Hibar DP, Schmaal L, Jiang W, Glahn DC, Pearlson GD, Yao N, Fukunaga M, Hashimoto R, Okada N, Yamamori H, Bustillo JR, Clark VP, Agartz I, Mueller BA, Cahn W, de Zwarte SMC, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS, Ophoff RA, van Haren NEM, Andreassen OA, Dale AM, Doan NT, Gurholt TP, Hartberg CB, Haukvik UK, Jørgensen KN, Lagerberg TV, Melle I, Westlye LT, Gruber O, Kraemer B, Richter A, Zilles D, Calhoun VD, Crespo-Facorro B, Roiz-Santiañez R, Tordesillas-Gutiérrez D, Loughland C, Carr VJ, Catts S, Cropley VL, Fullerton JM, Green MJ, Henskens FA, Jablensky A, Lenroot RK, Mowry BJ, Michie PT, Pantelis C, Quidé Y, Schall U, Scott RJ, Cairns MJ, Seal M, Tooney PA, Rasser PE, Cooper G, Shannon Weickert C, Weickert TW, Morris DW, Hong E, Kochunov P, Beard LM, Gur RE, Gur RC, Satterthwaite TD, Wolf DH, Belger A, Brown GG, Ford JM, Macciardi F, Mathalon DH, O'Leary DS, Potkin SG, Preda A, Voyvodic J, Lim KO, McEwen S, Yang F, Tan Y, Tan S, Wang Z, Fan F, Chen J, Xiang H, Tang S, Guo H, Wan P, Wei D, Bockholt HJ, Ehrlich S, Wolthusen RPF, King MD, Shoemaker JM, Sponheim SR, De Haan L, Koenders L, Machielsen MW, van Amelsvoort T, Veltman DJ, Assogna F, Banaj N, de Rossi P, Iorio M, Piras F, Spalletta G, McKenna PJ, Pomarol-Clotet E, Salvador R, Corvin A, Donohoe G, Kelly S, Whelan CD, Dickie EW, Rotenberg D, Voineskos AN, Ciufolini S, Radua J, Dazzan P, Murray R, Reis Marques T, Simmons A, Borgwardt S, Egloff L, Harrisberger F, Riecher-Rössler A, Smieskova R, Alpert KI, Wang L, Jönsson EG, Koops S, Sommer IEC, Bertolino A, Bonvino A, Di Giorgio A, Neilson E, Mayer AR, Stephen JM, Kwon JS, Yun JY, Cannon DM, McDonald C, Lebedeva I, Tomyshev AS, Akhadov T, Kaleda V, Fatouros-Bergman H, Flyckt L; Karolinska Schizophrenia Project, Busatto GF, Rosa PGP, Serpa MH, Zanetti MV, Hoschl C, Skoch A, Spaniel F, Tomecek D, Hagenaars SP, McIntosh AM, Whalley HC, Lawrie SM, Knöchel C, Oertel-Knöchel V, Stäblein M, Howells FM, Stein DJ, Temmingh HS, Uhlmann A, Lopez-Jaramillo C, Dima D, McMahon A, Faskowitz JI, Gutman BA, Jahanshad N, Thompson PM, Turner JA. Cortical Brain Abnormalities in 4474 Individuals With Schizophrenia and 5098 Control Subjects via the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics Through Meta Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium. Biol Psychiatry. 2018;84:644-654.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 451]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 532]  [Article Influence: 88.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Haijma SV, Van Haren N, Cahn W, Koolschijn PC, Hulshoff Pol HE, Kahn RS. Brain volumes in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis in over 18 000 subjects. Schizophr Bull. 2013;39:1129-1138.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 627]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 659]  [Article Influence: 59.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Thermenos HW, Milanovic S, Tsuang MT, Faraone SV, McCarley RW, Shenton ME, Green AI, Nieto-Castanon A, LaViolette P, Wojcik J, Gabrieli JD, Seidman LJ. Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:1279-1284.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1107]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1079]  [Article Influence: 71.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Galderisi S, Kaiser S. The pathophysiology of negative symptoms of schizophrenia: main hypotheses and open challenges. Br J Psychiatry. 2023;223:298-300.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Shinto AS, Kamaleshwaran KK, Srinivasan D, Paranthaman S, Selvaraj K, Pranesh MB, Lakshminarayanan GN, Prakash B. "Hyperfrontality" as seen on FDG PET in unmedicated schizophrenia patients with positive symptoms. Clin Nucl Med. 2014;39:694-697.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Howes O, McCutcheon R, Stone J. Glutamate and dopamine in schizophrenia: an update for the 21st century. J Psychopharmacol. 2015;29:97-115.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 528]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 497]  [Article Influence: 55.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  McCutcheon RA, Krystal JH, Howes OD. Dopamine and glutamate in schizophrenia: biology, symptoms and treatment. World Psychiatry. 2020;19:15-33.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 295]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 301]  [Article Influence: 75.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  McCutcheon R, Beck K, Jauhar S, Howes OD. Defining the Locus of Dopaminergic Dysfunction in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis and Test of the Mesolimbic Hypothesis. Schizophr Bull. 2018;44:1301-1311.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 144]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 150]  [Article Influence: 25.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Malik JA, Yaseen Z, Thotapalli L, Ahmed S, Shaikh MF, Anwar S. Understanding translational research in schizophrenia: A novel insight into animal models. Mol Biol Rep. 2023;50:3767-3785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Merritt K, McCutcheon RA, Aleman A, Ashley S, Beck K, Block W, Bloemen OJN, Borgan F, Boules C, Bustillo JR, Capizzano AA, Coughlin JM, David A, de la Fuente-Sandoval C, Demjaha A, Dempster K, Do KQ, Du F, Falkai P, Galińska-Skok B, Gallinat J, Gasparovic C, Ginestet CE, Goto N, Graff-Guerrero A, Ho BC, Howes O, Jauhar S, Jeon P, Kato T, Kaufmann CA, Kegeles LS, Keshavan MS, Kim SY, King B, Kunugi H, Lauriello J, León-Ortiz P, Liemburg E, Mcilwain ME, Modinos G, Mouchlianitis E, Nakamura J, Nenadic I, Öngür D, Ota M, Palaniyappan L, Pantelis C, Patel T, Plitman E, Posporelis S, Purdon SE, Reichenbach JR, Renshaw PF, Reyes-Madrigal F, Russell BR, Sawa A, Schaefer M, Shungu DC, Smesny S, Stanley JA, Stone J, Szulc A, Taylor R, Thakkar KN, Théberge J, Tibbo PG, van Amelsvoort T, Walecki J, Williamson PC, Wood SJ, Xin L, Yamasue H, McGuire P, Egerton A; 1H-MRS in Schizophrenia Investigators. Variability and magnitude of brain glutamate levels in schizophrenia: a meta and mega-analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28:2039-2048.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 13.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Buck SA, Quincy Erickson-Oberg M, Logan RW, Freyberg Z. Relevance of interactions between dopamine and glutamate neurotransmission in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:3583-3591.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 14.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Xu XJ, Liu TL, He L, Pu B. Changes in neurotransmitter levels, brain structural characteristics, and their correlation with PANSS scores in patients with first-episode schizophrenia. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11:5215-5223.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Stoyanov D, Paunova R, Dichev J, Kandilarova S, Khorev V, Kurkin S. Functional magnetic resonance imaging study of group independent components underpinning item responses to paranoid-depressive scale. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11:8458-8474.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Haukvik UK, Hartberg CB, Agartz I. Schizophrenia--what does structural MRI show? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013;133:850-853.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 3.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Marder SR, Umbricht D. Negative symptoms in schizophrenia: Newly emerging measurements, pathways, and treatments. Schizophr Res. 2023;258:71-77.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Iliuta FP, Manea MC, Budisteanu M, Ciobanu AM, Manea M. Magnetic resonance imaging in schizophrenia: Luxury or necessity? (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021;22:765.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]