Observational Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 26, 2024; 12(9): 1597-1605
Published online Mar 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i9.1597
Clinical characteristics of acute non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding and the effect of endoscopic hemostasis
Xiao-Juan Wang, Yu-Peng Shi, Li Wang, Ya-Ni Li, Li-Juan Xu, Yue Zhang, Shuang Han, Department of Gastroenterology, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
ORCID number: Xiao-Juan Wang (0000-0003-1127-0252); Shuang Han (0000-0002-2719-260X).
Author contributions: Wang XJ and Shi YP reviewed the literature and participated in drafting the manuscript; Wang XJ drafted the manuscript; Wang L, Li YN, Xu LJ and Zhang Y revised the manuscript for important intellectual content; Wang XJ and Han S reviewed and revised the manuscript; Han S contributed to conception and design of the study, manuscript supervision, financial support; All authors read and approved the final version of this manuscript.
Supported by Xi’an Health Commission Residential Training Base Construction Project, No. 2023zp09.
Institutional review board statement: The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University (Approval No. 202205043).
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Data sharing statement: No additional data are available.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement—checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement—checklist of items.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Shuang Han, PhD, Professor, Department of Gastroenterology, Honghui Hospital Affiliated to Medicine College of Xi’an Jiaotong University, No. 555 Youyi East Road, Xi’an 710054, Shaanxi Province, China. shuanghamy@163.com
Received: November 18, 2023
Peer-review started: November 18, 2023
First decision: January 5, 2024
Revised: January 17, 2024
Accepted: February 28, 2024
Article in press: February 28, 2024
Published online: March 26, 2024
Processing time: 128 Days and 7.1 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) constitutes a prevalent emergency within Gastroenterology, encompassing 80%-90% of all gastrointestinal hemorrhage incidents. This condition is distinguished by its abrupt onset, swift progression, and notably elevated mortality rate.

AIM

To gather clinical data from patients with ANVUGIB at our hospital in order to elucidate the clinical characteristics specific to our institution and analyze the therapeutic effectiveness of endoscopic hemostasis.

METHODS

We retrospectively retrieved the records of 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB by endoscopy at our hospital between March 2021 and March 2023, utilizing our medical record system. Data pertaining to general patient information, etiological factors, disease outcomes, and other relevant variables were meticulously collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB, the male-to-female ratio was 2.91:1, with a higher prevalence among males. Notably, 43.6% of patients presented with black stool as their primary complaint, while 27.4% had hematemesis as their initial symptom. Upon admission, 17% of patients exhibited both hematemesis and black stool, while most ANVUGIB patients primarily complained of overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Urgent routine blood examinations at admission revealed that 75.8% of patients had anemia, with 63.4% experiencing moderate to severe anemia, and 1.5% having extremely severe anemia (hemoglobin < 30 g/L). With regard to etiology, 53.2% of patients experienced bleeding without a definitive trigger, 24.2% had a history of using gastric mucosa-irritating medications, 24.2% developed bleeding after alcohol consumption, 2.8% attributed it to improper diet, 1.7% to emotional excitement, and 2.3% to fatigue preceding the bleeding episode. Drug-induced ANVUGIB was more prevalent in the elderly than middle-aged and young individuals, while bleeding due to alcohol consumption showed the opposite trend. Additionally, diet-related bleeding was more common among the young age group compared to the middle-aged group. Gastrointestinal endoscopy identified peptic ulcers as the most frequent cause of ANVUGIB (73.3%), followed by gastrointestinal malignancies (10.9%), acute gastric mucous lesions (9.8%), and androgenic upper gastrointestinal bleeding (1.5%) among inpatients with ANVUGIB. Of the 532 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, 68 underwent endoscopic hemostasis, resulting in an endoscopic treatment rate of 12.8%, with a high immediate hemostasis success rate of 94.1%.

CONCLUSION

ANVUGIB patients exhibit diverse characteristics across different age groups, and endoscopic hemostatic treatments have demonstrated remarkable efficacy.

Key Words: Acute non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding; Clinical characteristics; Cause of disease; Endoscopic homeostatic therapy

Core Tip: This retrospective study analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with acute non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) through endoscopic examinations at our hospital. The results revealed distinct characteristics among patients of different age groups with ANVUGIB. Although this study was conducted at a single center, the age and gender distribution of the patients in this study were similar to those reported in previous multicenter studies in China. The study also assessed the therapeutic effectiveness of endoscopic hemostatic treatment, and indicated that it is an effective approach for treating ANVUGIB, improving efficacy, and deserves wider application.



INTRODUCTION

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is characterized as gastrointestinal hemorrhage that originates proximal to the ligament of Treitz in the duodenum. Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) represents a common emergency in the field of Gastroenterology, accounting for 80%-90% of all cases of gastrointestinal bleeding[1]. It is characterized by its sudden onset, rapid progression, and high mortality rate[2]. The primary cause of NVUGIB is typically gastroduodenal peptic ulcers, succeeded by gastroduodenal erosions. Other prevalent causes include peptic esophageal lesions (esophagitis or esophageal ulcers), vascular anomalies such as Dieulafoy lesions (a medical condition characterized by an abnormal, tortuous arteriole penetrating the gastrointestinal mucosa), and vascular ectasias such as angiodysplasia (a minor vascular malformation in the gut). Additionally, Mallory–Weiss tears (mucosal lacerations at the gastroesophageal junction, often associated with recurrent vomiting, particularly following excessive alcohol consumption or a large meal) and, to a lesser extent, neoplastic lesions, are also notable causes of NVUGIB[3,4]. Significant advancements in medicine over the past two decades have influenced both the incidence and outcomes of NVUGIB. On the one hand, the introduction of potent acid-suppressing medications, recognition of Helicobacter pylori as a key etiological factor in peptic ulcers leading to targeted eradication therapy, advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, implementation of restrictive blood transfusion policies, and enhanced management of critically ill patients are pivotal factors that have decreased the risk of developing NVUGIB and improved its management and outcomes. On the other hand, certain risk factors are becoming increasingly prevalent. These include an aging population, which contributes to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and other comorbidities that escalate the mortality risk associated with NVUGIB, and the growing use of low-dose aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and other antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents[5-7]. The etiological landscape seems to be changing over time, but the overall incidence of hospitalizations remains high. During the initial stages of this condition, patients frequently present symptoms such as hematemesis and melena, and in severe cases, peripheral circulatory failure may develop. In clinical practice, traditional medical treatments are often employed to manage ANVUGIB, but their effectiveness in controlling acute active bleeding is frequently unsatisfactory. The advent of endoscopic techniques and innovative endoscopic accessories has significantly enhanced the efficiency of hemostasis[8-10].

This study entails a retrospective analysis involving the retrieval of medical records pertaining to 532 patients who received a diagnosis of ANVUGIB through endoscopic examination at our hospital between March 2021 and March 2023. Data encompassing general patient information, etiological factors, and disease outcomes were systematically collected to gain insights into the clinical characteristics of ANVUGIB within our hospital. Furthermore, the study aims to enhance the understanding of ANVUGIB among our clinical practitioners and improve the standards of diagnosis and treatment. Additionally, the research assesses the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis in patients who underwent this procedure.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Patient data

The data of 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB through endoscopic examinations at our hospital between March 2021 and March 2023 were retrieved from the hospital's medical records system. General patient information, etiological factors, and disease outcomes were meticulously gathered and refined. Data from patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis treatment were specifically chosen to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapeutic approach.

Research methods

A retrospective analysis of patient data was undertaken, including age, gender, chief complaint upon admission, hemoglobin (Hb) levels, precipitating factors, etiology, treatment outcomes, and the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment. Moreover, an additional analysis examined the interplay between precipitating factors, etiology, and age groups by categorizing patients into the following groups: the young group (age < 40 years), middle-aged group (age < 60 but ≥ 40 years), and elderly group (age ≥ 60 years).

Statistical analysis

In this study, initial data collection was accomplished through Excel spreadsheets. All data underwent statistical analysis using SPSS 26.0 software. Frequency and percentage (%) were used to present count data, while measurement data were presented as means with standard deviations (mean ± SD). The comparison of count data was performed using the Pearson chi-square test or the continuity correction test, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05 to indicate significant differences.

RESULTS
General situation

A total of 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB were treated at our center between March 2021 and March 2023, presenting with symptoms such as hematemesis, melena, and other upper gastrointestinal bleeding (Table 1). Among them, there were 396 males (74.44%) and 136 females (25.56%), resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 2.91:1. The age of the patients ranged from 18 to 94 years, with an average age of 53.34 ± 18.92 years and an average hospital stay of 7.6 ± 4.56 d.

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the included patients.
Items

Number
Percentage
SexMen39674.44
Women13625.56
Age (yr)Young group (age < 40)13926.13
Middle-aged group (age < 60 but ≥ 40)22141.54
Elderly group (age ≥ 60)17232.33
Chief complaintMelena23243.60
Hematemesis14627.40
Both hematemesis and melena9017.00
Abdominal pain326.00
Atypical complaints (dizziness, weakness)326.00
Hemoglobin levelsHb ≤ 30 g/L81.50
Hb 30-60 g/L5810.90
Hb 60-90 g/L20338.20
Hb 90-120 g/L13425.20
Hb ≥ 120 g/L12924.20
Precipitating factorDrugs12924.20
Alcohol8415.80
Diet152.80
Psychological factors214.00
No precipitating factor28353.20
Chief complaint and hemoglobin levels on admission

After collecting and analyzing the chief complaints of patients upon admission, it was observed that the majority of ANVUGIB patients presented with a primary complaint related to gastrointestinal bleeding. Among these patients, 232 cases (43.6%) reported melena as their primary complaint, representing the highest proportion. Additionally, 146 cases (27.4%) cited hematemesis as their primary complaint, while 90 cases (17.0%) reported both hematemesis and melena. Abdominal pain was the primary complaint in 32 cases (6.0%), while 32 cases (6.0%) had atypical complaints such as dizziness and weakness, with ANVUGIB confirmed after further examination.

Urgent routine blood tests conducted upon admission revealed that 75.8% of the patients were anemic. Among them, 8 cases (1.5%) had severe anemia (Hb ≤ 30 g/L), 58 cases (10.9%) had moderate anemia (Hb 30-60 g/L), 203 cases (38.2%) had mild to moderate anemia (Hb 60-90 g/L), 134 cases (25.2%) had mild anemia (Hb 90-120 g/L), and 129 cases (24.2%) did not exhibit anemia (Hb ≥ 120 g/L).

Precipitating factor of ANVUGIB

Upon reviewing the admission records and the medical course, it was observed that 53.2% of the patients did not have an evident precipitating factor before experiencing bleeding, while nearly half of the patients had relatively clear triggers preceding the bleeding episode. Among this group, 129 cases (24.2%) had used aspirin, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, chemotherapy, and molecular targeted drugs known to stimulate and damage the gastric mucosa. Additionally, some patients were taking anticoagulant drugs such as warfarin and rivaroxaban, which impacted their coagulation function. Eighty-four (15.8%) patients had a history of alcohol consumption before bleeding occurred. Improper diet was a contributing factor in 15 cases (2.8%), emotional excitement was noted in 9 cases (1.7%), and physical exertion was a factor in 12 cases (2.3%). Given the relatively low frequency of physical exertion and emotional excitement as precipitating factors, these will be collectively referred to as psychological factors in the subsequent text.

Relationship between etiology of ANVUGIB and age groups

The patients were stratified into three age groups: the young group (age < 40 years), the middle-aged group (age < 60 but ≥ 40 years), and the elderly group (age ≥ 60 years), with 139 patients in the young group, 221 patients in the middle-aged group, and 172 patients in the elderly group. Among the 249 patients for whom bleeding triggers were recorded, there were 65 cases in the young group, 103 cases in the middle-aged group, and 81 cases in the elderly group. Statistical analysis revealed differences in ANVUGIB triggered by drugs and alcohol among patients in various age groups, while no significant differences were observed in ANVUGIB induced by dietary and psychological factors among patients in different age groups (Table 2).

Table 2 Relationship between acute non-varicose upper digestive hemorrhage pathogenesis and age group.
Age group
Drugs
Alcohol
Diet
Psychological factors
Young group65177
Middle-aged group362839
Elderly group86655
χ276.56335.7411.6001.143
P value0.0000.0000.4490.565
Various causes of ANVUGIB

Upon completion of gastrointestinal endoscopy, it was evident that peptic ulcer disease constituted the vast majority of ANVUGIB cases, accounting for 73.3% (390 cases). Gastrointestinal malignancies comprised 10.9% (58 cases), while acute gastric mucosal lesions represented 9.8% (52 cases). Other contributing factors included duodenal diseases, angiodysplasia, esophageal ulcers, and anastomotic ulcers, collectively amounting to 4.5% (24 cases). Iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal bleeding accounted for 1.5% (8 cases), encompassing post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)/endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) bleeding, post-EST bleeding at the duodenal papilla, and post-polypectomy bleeding in the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Among the 390 diagnosed cases of gastrointestinal ulcer bleeding, 213 were attributed to duodenal ulcers, 116 to gastric ulcers, and 53 to compound ulcers involving both gastric and duodenal ulcers. Given the relatively low theoretical frequency, variance analysis based on the age of onset was not conducted for upper gastrointestinal bleeding patients caused by esophageal ulcers, anastomotic ulcers, duodenal diseases, upper gastrointestinal vascular malformations, and iatrogenic factors.

Relationship between causes of ANVUGIB and age of onset

A total of 532 patients with ANVUGIB underwent complete gastrointestinal endoscopy to determine the cause of bleeding. Among them, 139 cases were in the young age group, 221 cases were in the middle-aged group, and 172 cases were in the elderly group. Statistical analysis revealed differences in the causes of gastrointestinal bleeding among the different age groups (Table 3). Further pairwise comparisons using chi-square analysis showed that the comparison of bleeding caused by duodenal ulcers between the young and middle-aged groups was not statistically significant (χ2 = 3.841, P = 0.05). However, the incidence rate in both the young and middle-aged groups was higher than that in the elderly group, with significant differences (P < 0.05).

Table 3 Relationship between acute non-varicose upper digestive hemorrhage etiology and age group.
Age group
Duodenal ulcer
Gastric ulcer
Complex ulcer
Cancer
Acute gastric mucosal lesions
Young group751820223
Middle-aged group1014827825
Elderly group37506485
χ229.18316.62112.94364.69013.736
P value0.0000.0000.0020.0000.001

The comparison of gastric ulcer bleeding between the middle-aged and elderly groups was not statistically significant (χ2 = 0.041, P = 0.840), but the incidence rate in both the middle-aged and elderly groups was higher than that in the young group, with significant differences (χ2 = 13.363, P < 0.001, χ2 = 15.059, P < 0.001). The incidence rate of compound ulcer bleeding was not statistically significant between the young and middle-aged groups (χ2 = 1.043, P = 0.307), but it was higher than that in the elderly group, with significant differences (P < 0.05).

The comparison of bleeding caused by upper gastrointestinal malignancies between the young and middle-aged groups was not statistically significant (χ2 = 3.600, P = 0.773), but it was significantly lower than that in the elderly group (P < 0.05). Among patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute gastric mucosal lesions, there was no statistical difference between the young and middle-aged groups (χ2 = 0.083, P = 0.058), but both were higher than those in the elderly group (P < 0.05).

Therefore, it can be concluded that acute gastric mucosal lesions, duodenal ulcers, and compound ulcers are more common in the middle-aged and young age groups, while gastric ulcers are more common in the middle-aged and elderly groups. The incidence rate of upper gastrointestinal malignancies was significantly higher in the elderly population compared to the middle-aged and young age groups.

Treatment and outcome

Of the 532 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, a total of 464 patients were diagnosed by endoscopy. These patients either received conservative drug therapy or were promptly referred to other departments for surgery or interventional treatment. Among them, 68 patients who were hemodynamically stable or stabilized after volume expansion underwent endoscopic hemostatic treatment, representing an endoscopic treatment rate of 12.8%. Of the 68 patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis during gastroscopy, four patients encountered challenges during the procedure for various reasons. Among these, three patients required embolization therapy for hemostasis, while one patient underwent surgical intervention for hemostasis. The remaining 64 bleeding patients achieved immediate hemostasis through endoscopic treatment, resulting in an immediate endoscopic hemostasis rate of 94.1% (Table 4).

Table 4 Statistics of rebleeding after acute non-varicose upper digestive hemorrhage endoscopic hemostasis.

Number
Percentage
Rebleeding was recorded within 72 h after endoscopic treatment710.9
Rebleeding was recorded 72 h after endoscopic treatment46.3
No further bleeding after endoscopic treatment5382.8
DISCUSSION

ANVUGIB represents a grave condition characterized by a high incidence, rebleeding rate, and mortality rate. It has consistently remained a subject of great concern for gastroenterologists and emergency physicians. This study undertook a retrospective analysis of patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB through endoscopic examinations conducted between March 2021 and March 2023 at our hospital. The findings revealed a significantly higher number of male patients compared to female patients, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.91:1. The age of patients ranged from 18 to 94 years, with an average age of 53.34 ± 18.92 years and an average hospital stay of 7.6 ± 4.56 days. In line with previous studies conducted by Yan-Xia Zhang and Rong Han, gender emerged as one of the influencing factors for the occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding[11,12]. Simplified statistics concerning admission complaints indicated that 43.6% of patients presented with melena as their primary complaint upon admission, while 27.4% presented with hematemesis. Additionally, 17% of patients exhibited both hematemesis and melena upon admission. The majority of ANVUGIB patients sought medical attention with clear complaints of gastrointestinal bleeding, underscoring the importance of vigilance for patients with atypical gastrointestinal bleeding complaints during the clinical assessment. Routine blood examination results at admission revealed that 75.8% of patients exhibited anemia, with 63.4% of them classified as having moderate or more severe anemia. A minority of patients (1.5%) presented with extremely severe anemia (Hb < 30 g/L). The initial routine blood examination upon admission played a crucial role in determining whether patients required immediate blood transfusion therapy. Patients with Hb levels below 70 g/L were considered primary candidates for transfusion therapy[5].

In recent years, there has been a notable surge in drug-related acute gastric mucosal lesions and bleeding, specifically associated with medications such as aspirin and heparin. This trend can be attributed to the aging population and the heightened prevalence of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases among the elderly. Cai et al[13] conducted a study involving 253 patients with acute gastric mucosal lesions, where 153 cases (60.47%) were linked to NSAIDs and anticoagulant drugs. Notably, the incidence ratio between the first five years and the last five years exhibited statistical significance (P < 0.05). In this investigation, upon categorizing the patients into different age groups, it was revealed that 53.2% of the patients experienced bleeding without any apparent triggers beforehand, while nearly half of the patients had identifiable triggers preceding the bleeding episode. Among this latter group, 24.2% of the patients were using aspirin, NSAIDs, corticosteroids, chemotherapy drugs, and molecularly targeted drugs known to stimulate and damage the gastric mucosa, along with patients taking anticoagulant medications such as warfarin and rivaroxaban, which impact coagulation function. These individuals were primarily middle-aged and elderly, further reinforcing the aforementioned findings. Moreover, patients with a history of alcohol consumption accounted for 15.8% of cases before the onset of bleeding. Subsequent subgroup analysis indicated that the rise in the proportion of ANVUGIB in the younger age group was primarily linked to digestive ulcers and acute gastric mucosal lesions caused by alcohol consumption in this demographic.

Further research conducted among the different age groups revealed variations in the etiology of gastrointestinal bleeding. When comparing bleeding caused by duodenal ulcers between the young and middle-aged groups, no statistically significant difference was observed (χ2 = 3.841, P = 0.05). However, the incidence rates were higher in both the young and middle-aged groups when compared to the elderly group, and these differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). Similarly, when examining gastric ulcer bleeding between the middle-aged and elderly groups, no statistical significance was found (χ2 = 0.041, P = 0.840). Nevertheless, the incidence rates of gastric ulcer bleeding were notably higher in both the middle-aged and elderly groups in comparison to the young group, and these disparities were statistically significant (χ2 = 13.363, P < 0.001, χ2 =15.059, P < 0.001). The incidence rate of combined ulcer bleeding showed no statistical significance between the young and middle-aged groups (χ2 = 1.043, P = 0.307), but it was significantly elevated in both of these groups when compared to the elderly group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Furthermore, when comparing patients with upper gastrointestinal malignant tumors causing bleeding between the young and middle-aged groups, no statistical significance was observed (χ2 =3.600, P = 0.773). However, both of these groups exhibited significantly lower incidence rates when compared to the elderly group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). In conclusion, it can be deduced that acute gastric mucosal lesions, duodenal ulcers, and combined ulcers are more prevalent in the middle-aged and young groups, while gastric ulcers are more common in the middle-aged and elderly groups. Additionally, the incidence rate of upper gastrointestinal malignant tumors is notably higher among the elderly population as compared to the middle-aged and young groups.

Furthermore, as endoscopic technology continues to advance and the number of endoscopic procedures performed rises, iatrogenic gastrointestinal bleeding has been increasingly identified as a notable complication during and after surgeries. In this retrospective analysis, iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal bleeding constituted 1.5% of cases (8 instances), encompassing post-ESD/EMR bleeding, bleeding following EST procedures in the duodenal papilla, and post-endoscopic polypectomy bleeding in the upper gastrointestinal tract. A comprehensive literature review disclosed noteworthy discrepancies in the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative bleeding associated with ESD/EMR across different medical centers[14-17]. This analysis suggests that the substantial variations in occurrence rates might be attributed to various factors, such as differing definitions of bleeding complications employed by different physicians, the extent of submucosal dissection, and the extent of electrocoagulation applied to the wound surface after dissection.

Several previous studies[18-22] have affirmed the therapeutic efficacy of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the management of ANVUGIB. It has been shown to significantly enhance treatment outcomes, reduce the treatment duration, and improve Hb levels. In this particular investigation, conducted among a cohort of 532 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, a total of 68 patients underwent endoscopic hemostatic procedures, representing a utilization rate of 12.8% for endoscopic treatment. The indications for endoscopic treatment predominantly included pulsatile bleeding, oozing, exposure of blood vessels, and identification of the primary bleeding site following the removal of blood clots due to various etiologies. Among the 68 patients who underwent endoscopic hemostasis via gastroscopy, four cases encountered challenges in achieving hemostasis through endoscopy due to various factors. Within this subgroup, three patients underwent embolization therapy to achieve hemostasis, while one patient required surgical intervention for hemostasis. Among the remaining 64 patients experiencing bleeding, immediate hemostasis was successfully achieved through endoscopic treatment, resulting in an impressive immediate endoscopic hemostasis rate of 94.1%. These results underscore the effectiveness of endoscopic hemostatic treatment for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it is crucial to remain vigilant against the possibility of rebleeding.

CONCLUSION

In summary, this retrospective study examined the data of patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB by endoscopic examination at our hospital. The results highlighted the distinct characteristics among ANVUGIB patients of different age groups. Although this study was conducted at a single center, it is noteworthy that the age and gender distribution of the patients in this study closely mirrored those reported in previous multicenter studies conducted in China. Furthermore, the therapeutic impact of endoscopic hemostatic treatment was studied, and was found to be effective in managing ANVUGIB, enhancing treatment outcomes, and warrants wider application.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (ANVUGIB) constitutes a prevalent emergency within Gastroenterology, encompassing 80%-90% of all gastrointestinal hemorrhage incidents. This condition is distinguished by its abrupt onset, swift progression, and notably elevated mortality rate.

Research motivation

This research was designed to collect clinical data from patients experiencing ANVUGIB at our hospital. The objective was to identify clinical features unique to our institution and to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis treatment.

Research objectives

The aim is to clarify the distinct clinical characteristics associated with our institution and to assess the therapeutic efficacy of endoscopic hemostasis.

Research methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB via endoscopy at our hospital from March 2021 to March 2023, utilizing our electronic medical records system. Data encompassing general patient demographics, etiological factors, clinical outcomes, and other pertinent variables were scrupulously gathered and examined.

Research results

In the cohort of 532 patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB, the male-to-female ratio was 2.91:1, indicating a higher incidence in males. Notably, 43.6% of these patients reported black stool as their primary symptom, while 27.4% initially presented with hematemesis. On admission, 17% of patients showed symptoms of both hematemesis and black stool. The majority of ANVUGIB patients primarily complained of overt gastrointestinal bleeding. Urgent hematological assessments upon admission revealed that 75.8% of the patients were anemic, with 63.4% suffering from moderate to severe anemia, and 1.5% exhibiting extremely severe anemia (Hemoglobin < 30 g/L). Etiologically, 53.2% experienced bleeding without an identifiable trigger, 24.2% had a history of ingesting gastric mucosa-irritating medications, 24.2% developed bleeding post alcohol consumption, 2.8% linked their bleeding to improper diet, 1.7% to emotional excitement, and 2.3% to fatigue prior to the bleeding episode. Drug-induced ANVUGIB was more common in the elderly compared to middle-aged and younger individuals, while alcohol-related bleeding was more frequent in younger patients. Moreover, diet-related bleeding incidents were predominantly observed in the younger demographic compared to middle-aged individuals. Gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed peptic ulcers as the leading cause of ANVUGIB, accounting for 73.3% of cases, followed by gastrointestinal malignancies (10.9%), acute gastric mucosal lesions (9.8%), and androgenic upper gastrointestinal bleeding (1.5%). Of the 532 patients with gastrointestinal bleeding, 68 underwent endoscopic hemostasis, representing a treatment rate of 12.8%, with a notably high immediate hemostasis success rate of 94.1%.

Research conclusions

Patients across various age groups present with distinct characteristics, and endoscopic hemostatic treatments showed significant efficacy.

Research perspectives

This retrospective analysis focused on patients diagnosed with ANVUGIB via endoscopic examination at our hospital. The study underscored the unique characteristics of ANVUGIB patients across various age demographics. Additionally, it determined the therapeutic effectiveness of endoscopic hemostatic treatment, affirming its efficiency in managing ANVUGIB, improving treatment outcomes, and advocating for its wider implementation.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research & experimental

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): D

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Sukocheva OA, Australia S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: Webster JR P-Editor: Chen YX

References
1.  Ray-Offor E, Opusunju K. Re-bleed and Mortality Amongst Patients Following Initial Endoscopy for Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: A Single-Center Nigeria Study. Cureus. 2021;13:e12939.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Marmo R, Soncini M, Bucci C, Occhipinti V, Pellegrini L, Zullo A; GISED Study Group. Derivation and validation of Re.Co.De death score risk in patients with acute nonvariceal upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:36-43.e8.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Rotondano G. Epidemiology and diagnosis of acute nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2014;43:643-663.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 60]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 63]  [Article Influence: 6.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Hreinsson JP, Kalaitzakis E, Gudmundsson S, Björnsson ES. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding: incidence, etiology and outcomes in a population-based setting. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:439-447.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 85]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 100]  [Article Influence: 9.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:928-937.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 228]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 207]  [Article Influence: 12.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Laine L, Jensen DM. Management of patients with ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:345-60; quiz 361.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 483]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 449]  [Article Influence: 37.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
7.  Lau JY, Barkun A, Fan DM, Kuipers EJ, Yang YS, Chan FK. Challenges in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Lancet. 2013;381:2033-2043.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 142]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 139]  [Article Influence: 12.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Bapaye J, Chandan S, Naing LY, Shehadah A, Deliwala S, Bhalla V, Chathuranga D, Okolo PI 3rd. Safety and efficacy of over-the-scope clips vs standard therapy for high-risk nonvariceal upper GI bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:712-720.e7.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Gralnek IM, Stanley AJ, Morris AJ, Camus M, Lau J, Lanas A, Laursen SB, Radaelli F, Papanikolaou IS, Cúrdia Gonçalves T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Awadie H, Braun G, de Groot N, Udd M, Sanchez-Yague A, Neeman Z, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (NVUGIH): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2021. Endoscopy. 2021;53:300-332.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 93]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 205]  [Article Influence: 68.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
10.  Naseer M, Lambert K, Hamed A, Ali E. Endoscopic advances in the DOImanagement of non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;12:1-16.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 24]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 3.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Ai H. Application of endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of early colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions. Zhongguo Shequ Yishi. 2020;36:18-20.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
12.  Dan HR. Clinical characteristics of 646 cases of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Linchuang Xiaohuabing Zazhi. 2021;33:442-444.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Cai L, Zhang M, Zhao DD, Zhao QC, Niu XY. Analysis of etiological and related factors responsible for upper gastrointestinal bleeding in 2056 patients. Shoudu Yike Daxue Xuebao. 2015;36:978-981.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
14.  Zhang W. Logistic regression Analysis of risk factor of bleeding during gastric ESD operation and establishment of Logistic regression model. Zhongnan Yixue Kexue Zazhi. 2023;51:77-79.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Al Ghamdi SS, Ngamruengphong S. Prevention of clinically significant post-EMR bleeding: To clip or not to clip? Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;96:732-734.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Iqbal U, Nawaz A, Ahmed Z, Kamal F, Lee-Smith W, Khan MA, Alastal Y, Confer BD, Khara HS. Safety of endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic polyps in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2022;35:420-426.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Mohapatra S, Fukami N. Prevention of bleeding after EMR of colorectal lesions: when and how? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;7:109-110.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Tanabe S. Endoscopic hemostasis for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc. 2022;34 Suppl 2:61-63.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Kichler A, Jang S. Endoscopic Hemostasis for Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: New Frontiers. Clin Endosc. 2019;52:401-406.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Soetikno R, Ishii N, Kolb JM, Hammad H, Kaltenbach T. The Role of Endoscopic Hemostasis Therapy in Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2018;28:391-408.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Weilert F, Binmoeller KF. New Endoscopic Technologies and Procedural Advances for Endoscopic Hemostasis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:1234-1244.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
22.  Klein A, Gralnek IM. Acute, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:154-162.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]