Published online Sep 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6415
Peer-review started: July 18, 2023
First decision: August 4, 2023
Revised: August 10, 2023
Accepted: August 31, 2023
Article in press: August 31, 2023
Published online: September 26, 2023
Processing time: 64 Days and 7.9 Hours
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) combined with spontaneous pneumothorax, is characterized by significant decline in lung function, and even cause cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia.
To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters and indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) in managing closed thoracic drainage in patients diag
Retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical information of 60 elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax admitted to the Shexian Branch of the second affiliated hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine between March 2020 and March 2023. The clinical efficacy, complications, hospitalization duration, and costs were compared between patients with an indwelling thoracic catheter and those with a central venous catheter. Uni
According to our findings, there were significant differences in the IPC group’s clinical efficacy, catheter operation time, and lung recruitment time (P < 0.05). Comparing the complications after catheter treatment between the two groups revealed statistically significant variations in the incidence of postoperative analgesics, catheter abscission, catheter blockage, and subcutaneous emphysema in the IPC group (P < 0.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between patients with and without catheter dislodgement regarding duty nurse’s working years (less than three), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores (less than 15), lack of catheter suture fixation, and the proportion of catheters not fixed twice (P < 0.05).
Our results demonstrated that when treating elderly COPD patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, indwelling thoracic catheters are more effective than the central venous catheter group. Patients’ catheter shedding is influenced by the primary nurse’s working years, APACHE II scores, and catheter fixation technique.
Core Tip: To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of central venous catheters and indwelling pleural catheters in managing closed thoracic drainage in patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with concomitant by spontaneous pneumothorax.
- Citation: Wang W, Zhu DN, Shao SS, Bao J. Closed thoracic drainage in elderly patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax: A retrospective study. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(27): 6415-6423
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i27/6415.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i27.6415
The blood oxygen levels decrease, lung volume expands, airway wall membrane deteriorates, and pleural effusion escalates in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) accompanied by spontaneous pneumothorax[1,2]. The clinical presentation often includes symptoms such as cough, chest tightness, chest pain, and wheezing. This condition can be easily mistaken for an acute exacerbation of COPD. Without prompt intervention, respiratory failure can intensify, significantly heightening the risk of mortality [1,3,4].
Spontaneous pneumothorax, when not due to trauma or other external causes, is characterized by the accumulation of air in the pleural cavity. This accumulation arises from the sudden rupture of lung tissue and visceral pleura, allowing gas to infiltrate the pleural space[5]. Common precipitating events include sudden physical exertion, forceful coughing, diarrhea, sneezing, and even laughter, all of which can cause a significant increase in bronchial pressure[6]. Immediate thoracic puncture and decompression are crucial for managing spontaneous pneumothorax. To expedite lung re-expansion and forestall pleural adhesion, closed thoracic drainage of either pleural fluid or air is commonly executed in COPD patients with spontaneous pneumothorax, using indwelling thoracic catheters or central venous catheters (CVC)[7]. However, during the clinical procedure, the closed thoracic drainage catheter often becomes dislodged, necessitating additional punctures that increase patient discomfort, medical expenses, and the risk of infection[8,9]. This recurrent dislodgement of the catheter during the clinical procedure creates a need for further punctures, thereby exacerbating the patient's pain, associated costs, and infection risk[10].
In this research, we undertook a retrospective analysis of clinical data from elderly patients with COPD compounded by spontaneous pneumothorax. We compared the clinical outcomes, complications, and hospital expenses between those equipped with indwelling thoracic catheters and those with CVC. Moreover, we probed into the underlying causes of catheter displacement. Our objective is to furnish critical clinical insights that can refine nursing care for elderly COPD patients contending with spontaneous pneumothorax.
From March 2020 to March 2023, 60 patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax who had closed thoracic drainage at Shexian People’s Hospital were chosen. The Ethics Committee of Shexian People’s Hospital gave its approval to this project.
(1) Patients over the age of 50; (2) Confirmed cases of COPD fulfill the diagnostic standards outlined in the COPD Treatment Guidelines; (3) An X-ray examination revealed the patient had a spontaneous pneumothorax; (4) Pneumothorax was a first-time occurrence in every patient; and (5) Complete patient clinical information.
(1) Patients with substantial heart, liver, kidney, and other organ damage; (2) Patients with a history of pneumothorax and mental disorders; (3) Patients with insufficient clinical and statistical data; and (4) Transferring to other hospital for treatment midway.
A total of 60 patients were included in the study, segmented into two groups based on the type of closed thoracic drainage catheter they received: the indwelling pleural catheters (IPC) group (n = 42) and the CVC group (n = 18). In the CVC group, a central venous catheter with a 2.1 mm diameter was utilized for closed thoracic drainage. Conversely, the IPC group was equipped with a 12th-size disposable indwelling thoracic drainage catheter boasting a 5.3 mm diameter. We documented patients’ foundational data, encompassing gender, age, and body mass index (BMI). Complications registered included the usage of analgesics, catheter obstructions, dislodgements, subcutaneous emphysema, lung infections, and incision infections. We also meticulously recorded metrics such as the duration of catheterization, lung recruitment time, catheter lifespan, years of experience of the attending nurse (3 years in this context), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, hospital stay duration, and associated hospitalization expenses, among other pertinent data for our retrospective analysis.
(1) Evaluation as effective: Chest tightness was alleviated or eliminated, and chest imaging revealed all lung tissue recruitment; and (2) Evaluation as ineffective: The patient’s symptoms did not improve after two weeks of catheterization, and chest imaging examination revealed no lung tissue recruitment or disease progression. Effective rate is equal to 100% effective/total instances.
SPSS 25.0 was used to statistically analyze the collected data. Utilizing the Chi-square test or continuously corrected chi-square test, statistical results were reported as a percentage (n/%). The mean and standard deviation were used to express measurement data. It employed an independent sample t test. The difference is regarded as statistically significant when P < 0.05.
The gender, age, and BMI of 60 patients in the two groups are compared in Table 1. With an average age of 69.81 ± 6.69 years, 37 of them were male (61.67%), while 23 of them were female (38.13%), with an average age of 71.06 ± 7.7 years. Four of the patients were very underweight, 11 were overweight, and 41 had BMIs that were within the normal range. According to Table 1, there was no discernible difference between the IPC group and CVC group in terms of gender, age, or BMI composition (P > 0.05).
Groups | Cases | Gender | Age (year) | BMI (kg/m2) | |||
Male/female | < 18.5 | 18.5-24.9 | 25-29.9 | > 30 | |||
IPC group | 42 | 26/16 | 69.81 ± 7.79 | 3 | 29 | 6 | 4 |
CVC group | 18 | 11/7 | 71.06 ± 7.70 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 0 |
t/χ2 | -0.57 | -0.57 | -0.167 | ||||
P value | 0.954 | 0.571 | 0.867 |
In this study, 42 participants received IPC and 18 patients received CVC in the trial of 60 patients with COPD and spontaneous pneumothorax. We collected data on clinical efficacy metrics such as lung recruitment time, catheter operation time, catheter survival time, duration of patient hospitalization, and associated costs (Table 2). A comparative analysis of the two catheter types was performed. The findings revealed that the IPC group had significantly shorter catheter operation times (12.12 ± 1.09 min) compared to the CVC group (13.00 ± 1.53 min). Similarly, the pulmonary recruitment time was notably shorter in the IPC group (1.52 ± 0.27 d) than in the CVC group (2.92 ± 0.73 d), with both differences being statistically significant at P < 0.05. Furthermore, the IPC group exhibited a higher effectiveness rate of 95.2% in contrast to the CVC group’s 72.2%, a statistically significant difference with P < 0.05.
Clinical data | IPC group (n = 42) | CVC group (n = 18) | t/χ2 | P value |
Lung recruitment time (d) | 1.52 ± 0.27 | 2.92 ± 0.73 | -10.783 | 0a |
Operating time (min) | 12.12 ± 1.09 | 13.00 ± 1.53 | -2.533 | 0.014a |
Catheters survival life (d) | 4.73 ± 0.65 | 4.8 ± 0.75 | -0.415 | 0.679 |
Hospitalization time (d) | 6.21 ± 0.68 | 6.06 ± 0.73 | 0.811 | 0.421 |
Hospitalization costs (thousand yuan) | 46.29 ± 9.65 | 43.89 ± 10.26 | 0.865 | 0.39 |
Effective | 40 (95.2) | 13 (72.2) | 4.44 | 0.035a,b |
When evaluating post-catheter therapy complications between the two groups (Table 3), the IPC group exhibited a higher rate of postoperative analgesic usage at 14.2%, compared to the CVC group’s 5.5%. Conversely, the CVC group recorded higher incidences of subcutaneous emphysema (33.3% vs. 7.1%), catheter obstruction (36.3% vs. 7.1%), and catheter prolapse (38.8% vs. 4.7%). These differences were statistically significant with P < 0.05. However, there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups.
Complication | IPC group (n = 42) | CVC group (n = 18) | χ2 | P value |
Use of analgesics | 6 (14.2) | 1 (5.5) | 0.277 | 0.599b |
Catheter occlusions | 2 (4.7) | 7 (38.8) | 8.988 | 0.003a,b |
Catheter prolapse | 6 (7.1) | 7 (36.3) | 4.494 | 0.034a |
Subcutaneous emphysema | 3 (7.1) | 6 (33.3) | 4.880 | 0.027a,b |
Pulmonary infection | 1 (2.3) | 1 (9.0) | 0 | 1b |
Incision infection | 1 (2.3) | 1 (9.0) | 0 | 1b |
Depending on whether catheter prolapse occurred, the 60 study participants were split into CP and nCP groups (Table 4). It was found that the nCP group, the working life of the responsible nurse was less than three years (43.18% vs. 62.5%), the APACHE II score was less than 15 points (25% vs. 37.5%), the catheter was not fixed with suture (48.18% vs. 68.75%), and the frequency of the catheter not fixed twice (40.9% vs. 56.25%) was lower than that in the CP group, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.
Factors | CP group (n = 16) | nCP group (n = 44) | t/χ2 | P value |
Gender | 0.006 | 0.936 | ||
Male | 10 | 27 | ||
Female | 6 | 17 | ||
Age (year) | 68.38 ± 9.493 | 70.84 ± 6.975 | -1.096 | 0.278 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 1.899 | 0.618 | ||
< 18.5 | 1 | 3 | ||
18.5-24.9 | 13 | 28 | ||
25-29.9 | 2 | 9 | ||
> 30 | 0 | 4 | ||
Lung recruitment time (d) | 2.30 ± 0.81 | 1.81 ± 0.75 | 2.226 | 0.06 |
Operating time (min) | 12.69 ± 1.35 | 12.27 ± 1.26 | 1.103 | 0.274 |
Catheters survival life (d) | 4.97 ± 0.81 | 4.68 ± 0.60 | 1.489 | 0.142 |
Hospitalization time (d) | 6.13 ± 0.72 | 6.18 ± 0.69 | -0.279 | 0.782 |
Hospitalization costs (thousand yuan) | 47.25 ± 9.60 | 44.95 ± 9.93 | 0.799 | 0.428 |
Primary nurses working years ≤ 3 | 10 (62.5) | 19 (43.18) | 13.137 | 0a |
APACHE-II score ≤ 15 | 6 (37.5) | 11 (25) | 9.201 | 0.02a |
Not secured with sutures | 11 (68.75) | 19 (48.18) | 13.611 | 0a |
Not fixed twice | 9 (56.25) | 18 (40.90) | 12.623 | 0a |
Our study revealed that elderly patients with COPD frequently demonstrate chronic inflammation of the small airways, heightened mucus gland secretion, ciliary dysfunction, degradation of the alveolar attachment structure, and fibrosis[11]. Moreover, these patients’ airway lumens undergo compromised drainage, resulting from factors like excessive mucus secretion, decreased elasticity causing stenosis or deformation, recurrent reshaping of lung elastic fibers, and the onset of emphysema. As a result, there’s a heightened occurrence of spontaneous pneumothorax in this elderly COPD population[12-14].
Spontaneous pneumothorax, which occurs in the absence of trauma or iatrogenic lung damage, is defined by an unexpected accumulation of air in the pleural space. It shows a bimodal age distribution, primarily appearing at ages 20 and 50[15]. While secondary spontaneous pneumothorax often manifests in older individuals with conditions such as COPD, interstitial lung disease, and other pulmonary disorders, primary spontaneous pneumothorax is more common in younger individuals who don’t have an underlying lung disease[1,16,17]. Notably, in Japan, emphysema or COPD are responsible for 60% to 80% of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax cases[12,18].
Elderly patients with spontaneous pneumothorax often exhibit poor cardiopulmonary function and rapid health deterioration, necessitating prompt and safe chest closure drainage to improve lung function and reduce mortality[19]. Currently, a variety of drainage tubes are utilized in clinical settings for chest closure drainage, including CVC, urine catheters, pig tail tubes, disposable silicone tubes (specifications and models: F12, F20, F24, F28, etc.), and chest puncture drainage tubes with inner cores[20,21]. The central venous catheter is widely used in clinical settings, primarily because of its comprehensive puncture package that includes a puncture needle, guidewire, cannula, blade, among other tools. Its appeal also lies in its narrow diameter, a soft and flexible catheter design, minimal hindrance to drainage efficiency, and user-friendliness[22,23].
While the IPC is relatively thick, ensuring smooth drainage and reduced likelihood of obstruction, the CVC is more delicate. Its lack of sufficient rigidity and a non-porous sidewall make it prone to obstructions, twists, distortions, or detachments, especially when folded[24,25]. Our study highlighted that shorter lung recruitment and catheter operation times led to better clinical outcomes. This advantage might be attributed to the IPC’s capacity to stimulate the visceral pleura during lung recruitment, promote pleural fiber exudation, and assist in repairing pleural ruptures[26,27].
Elevated chest pressure or lung re-expansion can cause the catheter to bend and become obstructed, leading to lumen blockage, which in turn results in gas leaking along the side wall of the indwelling tube the development of emphysema[28,29]. Based on our findings, patients in the IPC group exhibited a reduced frequency of catheter prolapse, obstruction, and subcutaneous emphysema. This might be related to the increased space between the indwelling tube and the skin’s soft tissue due to the skin-dilating effects of the CVC. Notably, the IPC group required a higher analgesic dosage compared to the CVC group. This could stem from factors like frailty, a weaker physical condition, and a diminished pain tolerance observed in some elderly COPD patients[30,31]. For many different reasons, the prolapse of chest closure drainage catheter is frequently found in clinical settings. In our study, there was a statistically significant correlation between catheter prolapse and the responsible nurse’s years of service, APACHE II score, and catheter fixation technique.
During the clinical procedure, the chest closed drainage catheter was placed without suture puncture or fixation to minimize patient discomfort. However, due to the smooth nature of the catheter, patients were prone to experiencing slippage during daily activities[32]. According to this study, the risk of catheter prolapses increased with the ratio of unsecured catheters with sutures and unfixed catheters twice. Therefore, after inserting the drainage tube, sutures in clinical procedures must be fastened to prevent slippage[32]. Instead of utilizing medical tape for secondary fixation, just sterile dressing was used to cover the point where the catheter is attached to the skin. As a result, the catheter is simple to remove when the patient perspires or scratches their skin. In order to prevent prolapse of the thoracic closed drainage catheter, on the basis of sterile transparent medical dressing, the drainage catheter was first glued into tic-tac-toe form with medical adhesive tape and then secured twice with adhesive tape at the catheter terminal junction[33-35].
The nursing care following the insertion of the chest closed drainage tube is crucial; however, in some cases, due to the limited clinical experience of certain responsible nurses, the patient’s drainage tube may fall off as a result of inadequate psychological nursing, insufficient attention during shift handovers, and improper evaluation[31,36]. Our study revealed a positive correlation between the responsible nurse having less than 3 years of experience and the occurrence of catheter prolapse. This underscores the need to bolster the clinical training programs for nurses concerning drainage tube procedures. After the placement of the drainage tube, it’s crucial to daily evaluate the patient’s level of cooperation and self-care capability. Furthermore, both patients and their families should be educated on the importance of bed rest during and after drainage when a chest cavity insertion is performed[37]. Additionally, patients should be instructed on how to improve their self-care abilities, emphasizing the significance of thorough self-examination and the proper fixation of the drainage bag during activities to prevent gravity-induced dislodgement of the drainage tube[38,39].
Patients in this study generally presented with milder conditions, as indicated by an APACHE II score of ≤ 15. This was linked to their pronounced sense of independence, resulting in reduced cooperation, frequent out-of-bed activities, and an increased likelihood of inadvertently touching the drainage tube. Additionally, being elderly meant that their skin and muscle elasticity was diminished, making the drainage tube more susceptible to slipping[40,41]. Therefore, following the placement of the drainage tube, we must provide excellent patient education, appropriately reduce the patient’s activity level, advise the patient to protect the drainage tube, intensify nutritional support therapy for patients, aim for an early recovery, and remove the drainage tube as soon as possible[42].
In conclusion, our research faced several limitations. Being a retrospective study, it had a restricted sample size and potentially lower data accuracy. Furthermore, the strain on nursing resources due to coronavirus disease 2019 might have influenced data collection, introducing potential biases.
Compared to the CVC, the indwelling thoracic catheter offers an immediate enhancement to lung function, rendering effective treatment for patients. Its advantages include a reduced risk of detachment or obstruction. For elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax, the indwelling thoracic catheter is the recommended choice. Additionally, during surgical procedures, it’s vital to securely fix the drainage tube, deliver meticulous postoperative care, educate patients on drainage tube maintenance, and emphasize the significance of these measures to prevent the thoracic closed drainage tube from detaching.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax is characterized by a significant decline in lung function, even cardiopulmonary failure and hypoxia in severe cases, which is extremely harmful to the elderly. The common clinical treatment is closed thoracic drainage.
To provide more effective and high quality clinical nursing for elderly patients with COPD complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax.
To compare the clinical data of different drainage methods in elderly patients with COPD complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax, and to choose a more suitable drainage method for elderly patients with COPD complicated with spontaneous pneumothorax.
Retrospectively analyzed.
The indwelling thoracic catheter offers an immediate enhancement to lung function, rendering effective treatment for elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax.
For elderly patients with COPD complicated by spontaneous pneumothorax, the indwelling thoracic catheter is the recommended choice.
Comparative research perspective.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): 0
Grade C (Good): C, C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Baba Y, Japan; Sasaki T, Japan S-Editor: Qu XL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Xu ZH
1. | Vogelmeier CF, Román-Rodríguez M, Singh D, Han MK, Rodríguez-Roisin R, Ferguson GT. Goals of COPD treatment: Focus on symptoms and exacerbations. Respir Med. 2020;166:105938. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 53] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 148] [Article Influence: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Scaramuzzo G, Ottaviani I, Volta CA, Spadaro S. Mechanical ventilation and COPD: from pathophysiology to ventilatory management. Minerva Med. 2022;113:460-470. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Christenson SA, Smith BM, Bafadhel M, Putcha N. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet. 2022;399:2227-2242. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 68] [Article Influence: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Murgia N, Gambelunghe A. Occupational COPD-The most under-recognized occupational lung disease? Respirology. 2022;27:399-410. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Gottlieb M, Long B. Managing Spontaneous Pneumothorax. Ann Emerg Med. 2023;81:568-576. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Huan NC, Sidhu C, Thomas R. Pneumothorax: Classification and Etiology. Clin Chest Med. 2021;42:711-727. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Butler H, Chrisanthopoulos V, Harous A, Eattimoottil SS, Senthilkumaran D, Tanious P, Wang B, Arruzza E. A scoping review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2022;53:728-736. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Zhou M, Wang T, Wei D, Zhu Y, Jiang Y, Zuo C, Jiang L, Chen H, Guo S, Yang L. Incidence, severity and tolerability of pneumothorax following low-dose CT-guided lung biopsy in different severities of COPD. Clin Respir J. 2021;15:84-90. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Saha BK, Chong WH, Hu K, Saha S, Bonnier A, Chenna P. Pressure-dependent persistent air leak in a patient with secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Am J Med Sci. 2022;364:782-788. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Ruge M, Marhefka GD. IVC measurement for the noninvasive evaluation of central venous pressure. J Echocardiogr. 2022;20:133-143. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9] [Article Influence: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Soriano JB, Polverino F, Cosio BG. What is early COPD and why is it important? Eur Respir J. 2018;52. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 50] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82] [Article Influence: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Ko FW, Chan KP, Hui DS, Goddard JR, Shaw JG, Reid DW, Yang IA. Acute exacerbation of COPD. Respirology. 2016;21:1152-1165. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 131] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 204] [Article Influence: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Negewo NA, Gibson PG, McDonald VM. COPD and its comorbidities: Impact, measurement and mechanisms. Respirology. 2015;20:1160-1171. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 102] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 168] [Article Influence: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Sandelowsky H, Weinreich UM, Aarli BB, Sundh J, Høines K, Stratelis G, Løkke A, Janson C, Jensen C, Larsson K. COPD - do the right thing. BMC Fam Pract. 2021;22:244. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Hallifax RJ, Goldacre R, Landray MJ, Rahman NM, Goldacre MJ. Trends in the Incidence and Recurrence of Inpatient-Treated Spontaneous Pneumothorax, 1968-2016. JAMA. 2018;320:1471-1480. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 67] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 99] [Article Influence: 16.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Onuki T, Ueda S, Yamaoka M, Sekiya Y, Yamada H, Kawakami N, Araki Y, Wakai Y, Saito K, Inagaki M, Matsumiya N. Primary and Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Prevalence, Clinical Features, and In-Hospital Mortality. Can Respir J. 2017;2017:6014967. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 34] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 54] [Article Influence: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Ichinose J, Nagayama K, Hino H, Nitadori J, Anraku M, Murakawa T, Nakajima J. Results of surgical treatment for secondary spontaneous pneumothorax according to underlying diseases. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1132-1136. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Brown SG, Ball EL, Macdonald SP, Wright C, McD Taylor D. Spontaneous pneumothorax; a multicentre retrospective analysis of emergency treatment, complications and outcomes. Intern Med J. 2014;44:450-457. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 32] [Article Influence: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Saito Y, Suzuki Y, Demura R, Kawai H. The outcome and risk factors for recurrence and extended hospitalization of secondary spontaneous pneumothorax. Surg Today. 2018;48:320-324. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Satoh Y. Management of chest drainage tubes after lung surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;64:305-308. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 14] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Toth JW, Reed MF, Ventola LK. Chest Tube Drainage Devices. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;40:386-393. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Marx T, Joly LM, Parmentier AL, Pretalli JB, Puyraveau M, Meurice JC, Schmidt J, Tiffet O, Ferretti G, Lauque D, Honnart D, Al Freijat F, Dubart AE, Grandpierre RG, Viallon A, Perdu D, Roy PM, El Cadi T, Bronet N, Duncan G, Cardot G, Lestavel P, Mauny F, Desmettre T. Simple Aspiration versus Drainage for Complete Pneumothorax: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023;207:1475-1485. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Brightling C, Greening N. Airway inflammation in COPD: progress to precision medicine. Eur Respir J. 2019;54. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 75] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 176] [Article Influence: 35.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Fahy B, Sockrider M. Central Venous Catheter. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199:P21-P22. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Shah PL, Herth FJ, van Geffen WH, Deslee G, Slebos DJ. Lung volume reduction for emphysema. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:147-156. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 65] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 93] [Article Influence: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Schwalk AJ, Ost DE. Indwelling Pleural Catheters. Clin Chest Med. 2021;42:739-750. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Velasquez Reyes DC, Bloomer M, Morphet J. Prevention of central venous line associated bloodstream infections in adult intensive care units: A systematic review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2017;43:12-22. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 37] [Article Influence: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Piirilä PL, Hodgson U, Wuorimaa T, Smith HJ, Sovijärvi AR. Thoracic gas compression during forced expiration in patients with emphysema, interstitial lung disease and obesity. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:34. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Tsotsolis N, Tsirgogianni K, Kioumis I, Pitsiou G, Baka S, Papaiwannou A, Karavergou A, Rapti A, Trakada G, Katsikogiannis N, Tsakiridis K, Karapantzos I, Karapantzou C, Barbetakis N, Zissimopoulos A, Kuhajda I, Andjelkovic D, Zarogoulidis K, Zarogoulidis P. Pneumothorax as a complication of central venous catheter insertion. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3:40. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
30. | Hodzic S, Golic D, Smajic J, Sijercic S, Umihanic S. Complications Related to Insertion and Use of Central Venous Catheters (CVC). Med Arch. 2014;68:300-303. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Machado FVC, Schneider LP, Fonseca J, Belo LF, Bonomo C, Morita AA, Furlanetto KC, Felcar JM, Rodrigues A, Franssen FME, Spruit MA, Pitta F, Hernandes NA. Clinical impact of body composition phenotypes in patients with COPD: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2019;73:1512-1519. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
32. | Panepinto R, Harris J, Wellette J. A Review of Best Practices Related to Intravenous Line Management for Nurses. Nurs Clin North Am. 2021;56:389-399. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Ullman AJ, Cooke ML, Mitchell M, Lin F, New K, Long DA, Mihala G, Rickard CM. Dressings and securement devices for central venous catheters (CVC). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015: CD010367. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 38] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 52] [Article Influence: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Mauri D, Zafeiri G, Tsali L, Chalkidou A, Zarkavelis G, Papadaki A, Filis P, Pentheroudakis G. Identification of catheter misplacement in early port CVC dysfunction. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2018;22:129-134. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
35. | Homma T, Ojima T, Shimada Y, Akemoto Y, Yoshimura N. Use of Quickfix for tape fixation of chest tubes: a multi-center doctor-nurse questionnaire survey and fixing strength comparison study. J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:493-503. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
36. | Mansfield E, Bryant J, Regan T, Waller A, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher R. Burden and Unmet Needs of Caregivers of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A Systematic Review of the Volume and Focus of Research Output. COPD. 2016;13:662-667. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Tcherveniakov P, De Siqueira J, Milton R, Papagiannopoulos K. Ward-based, nurse-led, outpatient chest tube management: analysis of impact, cost-effectiveness and patient safety. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:1353-5; discussion 1356. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5] [Article Influence: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
38. | Jouneau S, Ricard JD, Seguin-Givelet A, Bigé N, Contou D, Desmettre T, Hugenschmitt D, Kepka S, Gloan KL, Maitre B, Mangiapan G, Marchand-Adam S, Mariolo A, Marx T, Messika J, Noël-Savina E, Oberlin M, Palmier L, Perruez M, Pichereau C, Roche N, Garnier M, Martinez M. SPLF/SMFU/SRLF/SFAR/SFCTCV Guidelines for the management of patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax: Endorsed by the French Speaking Society of Respiratory Diseases (SPLF), the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU), the French Intensive Care Society (SRLF), the French Society of Anesthesia & Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (SFCTCV). Respir Med Res. 2023;83:100999. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
39. | Shalli S, Saeed D, Fukamachi K, Gillinov AM, Cohn WE, Perrault LP, Boyle EM. Chest tube selection in cardiac and thoracic surgery: a survey of chest tube-related complications and their management. J Card Surg. 2009;24:503-509. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 36] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43] [Article Influence: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Ruiz de Gopegui Miguelena P, Martínez Lamazares MT, Claraco Vega LM, Gurpegui Puente M, González Almárcegui I, Gutiérrez Ibañes P, Carrillo López A, Castiella García CM, Miguelena Hycka J. Evaluating frailty may complement APACHE II in estimating mortality in elderly patients admitted to the ICU after digestive surgery. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2022;46:239-247. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
41. | Godinjak A, Iglica A, Rama A, Tančica I, Jusufović S, Ajanović A, Kukuljac A. Predictive value of SAPS II and APACHE II scoring systems for patient outcome in a medical intensive care unit. Acta Med Acad. 2016;45:97-103. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 60] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 87] [Article Influence: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
42. | Patient-Centered Education in Wound Management: Improving Outcomes and Adherence. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021;34:1. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |