Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2023; 11(25): 5910-5918
Published online Sep 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i25.5910
Clinicopathological study of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors in the head and neck: Case reports and review of literature
Long Li, Yan Gao, Jing Yan, Ran Zhang, Department of Oral Pathology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100000, China
Long Li, Yan Gao, Jing Yan, Ran Zhang, Research Unit of Precision Pathologic Diagnosis in Tumors of the Oral and Maxillofacial Regions, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100000, China
Long Li, Department of Oral Pathology, Xiangya Stomalogical Hospital & School of Stomatology, Central South University, Changsha 410078, Hunan Province, China
Xiao-Kun Ma, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Affiliated Stomatological Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Stomatological Hospital, Suzhou 215000, Jiangsu Province, China
Dian-Can Wang, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing 100000, China
Rong-Fang Dong, Department of Pathology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing 100000, China
ORCID number: Ran Zhang (0000-0001-5815-2689).
Author contributions: Li L and Ma XK contributed equally to this work; Zhang R, Li L, Ma XK, Wang DC, Gao Y designed the research study; Jing Y, Dong RF performed the research; Li L, Ma XK, Zhang R analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; All authors have read and approve the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to this manuscript.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ran Zhang, MD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, National Engineering Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, No. 22 South Zhongguancun Avenue, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China. rani@bjmu.edu.cn
Received: March 27, 2023
Peer-review started: March 27, 2023
First decision: July 3, 2023
Revised: July 20, 2023
Accepted: August 8, 2023
Article in press: August 8, 2023
Published online: September 6, 2023
Processing time: 157 Days and 21.6 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare and aggressive soft tissue sarcoma that poses a major diagnostic and therapeutic challenge.

CASE SUMMARY

We retrospectively reviewed patients with head and neck MPNSTs treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2021. The clinical features, pathological manifestations, treatments, and prognoses were summarized. We also reviewed the literature, focusing on MPNST in the mandible and maxilla. The study population consisted of five women and five men aged 22–75 years (mean age, 49 years). Of the 10 patients, 7 were initial cases and 3 were recurrent cases. All lesions were sporadic. The most common site was the mandible. The most frequently encountered symptoms were a progressive mass and local swelling. Complete or partial loss of trimethylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3) was evident on staining in four of nine cases (one case was excluded due to lack of tissue for evaluation of loss of H3K27me3). The 2- and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 86% and 43%, respectively. The average survival time was 64 mo.

CONCLUSION

MPNST is a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis, prone to a high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis. Complete surgical resection is the main treatment.

Key Words: Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor; Head and neck; Treatment; Intraosseous; Surgery; Case report

Core Tip: We retrospectively reviewed patients with head and neck malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors treated in our hospital from 2000 to 2021. The study population consisted of five women and five men aged 22–75 years (mean age, 49 years). The 2- and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 86% and 43%, respectively. The average survival time was 64 mo. Complete or partial loss of trimethylation at lysine 27 of histone H3 (H3K27me3) was evident on staining in four of nine cases (one case was excluded due to lack of tissue for evaluation of loss of H3K27me3).



INTRODUCTION

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is an uncommon and aggressive tumor that arises from the cells of peripheral nerve sheaths. The most common anatomical sites are the trunk, extremities, and retroperitoneum. The head and neck region accounts for only 2%–9% of cases[1,2]. The clinical presentation of head and neck MPNST includes a rapidly enlarging mass, radicular pain or paresthesia, and neurological defects that depend on the anatomical sites involved[1]. Almost half of all cases are caused by defects in the neurofibromatosis type 1 gene located on chromosome 17; fewer than 10% of cases are radiation-induced (post-radiation sarcomas); the rest are sporadic cases of unknown etiology[3,4]. Histologically, MPNST is a spindle cell sarcoma arising from peripheral nerves, and varies in terms of nerve sheath differentiation; MPNST has been considered as a neurogenic sarcoma, neurofibrosarcoma, malignant schwannoma[1,5]. Most MPNSTs exhibit a tightly packed, stripe-like proliferation of spindle cells, which often complicate the diagnosis for pathologists. It is difficult to differentiate MPNSTs from other spindle cell sarcomas. The level of S-100 expression ranges from 50% to 70%, and is usually focal. In general, more primitive tumors are also more malignant, and are associated with low levels of S-100. Recent studies found that various components of polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) are inactivated in most MPNSTs. Homozygous PRC2 inactivation leads to loss of H3K27me3 (as revealed by immunohistochemical analysis), which may be a new immunohistochemistry marker for MPNST[6-9].

MPNST is a high-grade malignant tumor with a high recurrence rate. The local recurrence rate is almost 50%, and 33% of patients develop bone and lung metastases[1,10]. Similar to most soft tissue sarcomas, wide excision is the main treatment; the utility of adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy remains controversial[1]. In line with the high malignancy, the 5-year overall survival rate is only 20%-51%[3,11,12].

Here, we report on 10 MPNST cases, including 4 in the mandible and one in the maxilla, treated at our institution over a 20-year period. Immunohistochemical evaluation of H3K27me3 was conducted. We also review the literature with a focus on intraosseous MPNST in mandible and maxilla.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

Case 1: A 62-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of pigmented gingival lesions of the left anterior maxilla.

Case 2: A 28-year-old woman had a 6-mo history of a left mandibular gingival mass.

History of present illness

Case 1: The pathological diagnosis was an oral melanotic macule with increased melanocyte activity (Figure 1A). Two years later, clinical examination revealed a mild asymptomatic swelling on the anterior maxilla and two swollen lymph nodes on each side of the neck.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of the patient in case 1. A: Clinical and pathological presentations of the patient during the first visit to our hospital. A macular brown to black lesion was on the anterior maxillary gingiva and incisive foramen region (arrows). Histopathological image revealed the lesion was black macule; B: Clinicopathological presentations of the patient during the second visit to our hospital. A multinodular mass was noted on the anterior maxillary gingiva, and a local swelling was on the anterior to median portion of the palate. Coronal head computed tomography scan shows soft tissue masses in the front of the upper jaw with unclear boundary. The masses involved the post-surgical defect in the incisor region and there was lytic destruction of the underlying bone (arrows). Enlarged lymph nodes and the gross specimen of the lesion after the surgery. H&E characteristics of the case confirmed the diagnosis was malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Tumor cells show partial loss of H3K27me3 and positive stain for S-100, SOX10, nestin, and negative stain for HMB-45. The Ki-67 index is about 10%. Scale bar: 250 μm (A), 50 μm (B).

Case 2: The mandibular mass was located in the region of the 1st premolar to 1st molar teeth. The cortex of the buccal side was not continuous and the soft tissues of the cheek and tongue side were thickened.

Personal and family history

Case 1 and Case 2: Personal and family history denies the family history of genetic disease.

Laboratory examinations

Case 1 and Cases 2: Laboratory examinations reveal nothing abnormal.

Imaging examinations

Case 1: Computed tomography (CT) revealed a soft tissue mass in the anterior maxilla involving the surgical defect in the incisor region (Figure 1B).

Case 2: CT revealed a poorly-defined lytic lesion in the left mandible.

Clinicopathological characteristics

The clinical characteristics of the 10 patients are presented in Table 1; there were 7 de novo cases and 3 recurrences. No patient had a history of NF1 syndrome or radiotherapy before the first consultation. There were five male and five female patients, ranging in age from 22 to 75 years (mean age = 49 years). The mandible was the most common anatomical site. Other locations included the maxilla, gingiva, infratemporal fossa, and palate. The tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 4.5 cm (mean size = 2.9 cm). The most common initial symptoms were a progressive mass and local swelling (10/10 cases), sometimes accompanied by peripheral nerve symptoms including local pain or numbness (4/10 cases).

Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising in the head and neck.
Case
Sex/age
Location
Size (cm)
Treatment
Recurrence (site)
Survival
Follow-up (months)
H3K27Me3
1F/62Anterior maxilla2.5S+R+CDR (lung, bone)Yes28Positive
2F/28Left mandible3S+R+CNRYes24Positive
3M/22Right submandibular region2.5S///Complete loss
4M/74Gingival and the left cheek and left temporal2.5S///Positive
5F/48Mandible3S+R+CLR, DR (lung)No70Positive
6M/40Left facial and upper left gingiva3S+RLR, DR (trunk, brain)No216Partial loss
7F/40Right mandible3S///Partial loss
8F/44The left inferior temporal fossa4.5R+CNRNo13Partial loss
9M/58Right palat1.5SNRYes74/
10M/75Mandibular gingival3SDR (lung, lymph node)No24Positive

Morphologically, the tumors were composed predominantly of relatively monomorphic spindle cells arranged in intersecting long fascicles. The lesional cells exhibited hyperchromatic ovoid nuclei, with inconspicuous nucleoli and scant cytoplasm. MPNST is generally considered to be a high-grade sarcoma; in line with this, the mitosis score was relatively high in the current study. Large cells exhibiting obvious pleomorphism, or multinucleated giant cells, were found in three cases. Three other cases had areas of epithelial differentiation (Figure 2A-C). All cases evaluated with S100 staining were positive or focal positive, and melanotic markers such as HMB-45 and Melan-A were negative. H3K27me3 staining was evaluated immunohistochemically in the nine surgical cases; one of these (11.1%) exhibited complete H3K27me3 loss, while three (33.3%) showed partial loss (Figure 2D-F).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Histological characteristics of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) and immunohistochemical analysis of H3K27me3 in MPNST sections. A: The lesion cells display predominantly spindle in an architectural pattern; B: The cells are enlongated and tends to be hyperchromatic with scant cytoplasm; C: There is severe cytologic atypia and nuclear pleomorphism, with focally brisk mitotic activity; D: Complete loss of H3K27me3 expression on sections. Staining of blood vessels and inflammatory cells is the internal positive controls; E: Partial loss of H3K27me3 expression on the section; F: Strong expression of H3K27me3 is retained in some MPNST cases. Scale bars: 50 μm.

Nine of the ten patients were initially treated via wide excision; the other patient was prescribed chemotherapy because the tumor was too large to excise. Follow-up information was available for seven patients, who were followed-up for 13–216 mo (mean follow-up = 64 mo). Of these patients, four received both adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy; the remaining patient received radiotherapy only after surgery. Two patients developed local recurrence, and four distant metastasis, within 2 years. Four patients died, while three patients remain under follow-up and are free from disease after 24, 28 and 74 mo, respectively. The 2 and 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were 86% and 43%, respectively.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Case 1 and Cases 2: Biopsies were used to diagnose MPNST.

TREATMENT

Case 1: The patient then underwent partial maxillectomy and radical neck dissection.

Case 2: The patient underwent wide mandibular resection and radical neck dissection, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Case 1: Two years later, CT performed during regular follow-up revealed multiple pulmonary nodules; further examination confirmed lung and bone metastases.

Cases 2: The patient has remained disease-free for 2 years.

DISCUSSION

MPNST is an infiltrating and aggressive tumor of neural origin[13]. Although head and neck MPNSTs are histologically similar to MPNSTs in other regions, there are important clinical differences. Patel et al[3] performed a comparative analysis based on the SEER database. The mean age of head and neck MPNST patients was 49.1 years, compared to 46.1 years for patients with MPNSTs in other regions. The former group showed a male predilection (60.2%) while a sex predilection for females (54.2%) in the latter group. Also, the average tumor size of the former group was smaller than in the latter group. The mean age and average tumor size of our patients are consistent with these observations, but we observed no gender differences. This may reflect regional differences among our relatively small sample. MPNSTs develop sporadically, rather than in association with NF-1, in the head and neck region. Ma et al[2] reported that 69.8% (30/43) of MPNSTs were sporadic[14]. None of our cases had a history of NF1 syndrome or malignant transformation after radiotherapy, suggesting that they were all sporadic.

Previous studies found that primary intraosseous MPNST was rare[15]. We report four cases in the mandible and one case in the maxilla in this study; our review of the English language literature revealed 48 cases of primary intraosseous MPNST including 27 such cases in the mandible and 21 such cases in the maxilla. In the mandible, Ma et al[2] reported five patients, of whom three suffered recurrences. The other 22 cases were single cases; the clinical data of these cases, and our four cases, are shown in Supplementary Table 1[15-26]. Among the 26 patients, there were 19 women and 7 men, ranging in age from 4.5 to 76 years [mean age = 33 years (data were unavailable for three patients)]. One patient had a history of NF1 syndrome, and seventeen did not (data were unavailable for five patients). In the maxilla, Ma et al[2] reported 12 patients, of whom seven suffered recurrences. The other 9 cases were single cases; the clinical data of these cases, and our case, are shown in Table 2[19,27-34]. Among the 10 patients, there were 5 women and 5 men, ranging in age from 12 to 65 years (mean age = 44 years). Two patients had a history of NF1 syndrome, and six did not (data were unavailable for two patients). These datas revealed that MPNST in the mandible was more common in women than men, and there were no differences in the maxilla. Most of the patients had no history of NF1 syndrome in both mandible and maxilliary.

Table 2 A review of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor cases arising in the maxilla.
Ref.
Patients (n)
Sex
Age
Treatment
Follow-up (mon)
Recurrence
NF association
Kameyama et al[27], 19871F61///No
Urade et al[28], 19901F47S+R+C22Died of diseaseNo
Che et al[19], 20061F13R//No
Patil et al[29], 20071M45///No
Janardhanan et al[30], 20111M40S/Died of diseaseYes
Ali et al[31], 20111M50R8No/
Tamgadge et al[32], 20141M65///No
Neetha et al[33], 20041F12R///
Muraki et al[34], 19991M43R+C20Died of diseaseYes
Present study1F62S+R+C28YesNo

Given the lack of unique histological criteria and a specific immunoprofile, diagnosing MPNST can be very challenging. Some tumors have morphological features that overlap with those of MPNST, including fibrosarcomas and leiomyosarcomas; differential diagnosis is therefore essential. Fibrosarcomas have a simple structure, and are rich in collagen and S-100-negative onimmunohistochemistry. Leiomyosarcoma cells exhibit vacuoles around nuclei; the lesions develop in tissues and organs rich in smooth muscle, and stain positively for desmin and smooth muscle actin. When epithelioid cells predominate, MPSNT must be distinguished from malignant melanoma and epithelioid sarcoma. The lesion site of malignant melanoma is more superficial than that of MPSNT; moreover, the cell morphology is more irregular, and the nucleus is larger and more intenselystained. Melanomas stain positively for HMB45 and Melan-A. Epithelioid sarcomas are typical granulomas with many collagen fibers, and stain negatively for neuron-specific enolase.

Recent studies have shown that loss of H3K27me3, as revealed by immunohistochemical staining, was described in MPNST.The complete loss rate ranges from 34% to 84%[9,35-42]. Among our patients, 11.1% (n = 1) of the MPNST cases showed complete loss of H3K27me3, while 33.3% (n = 3) showed partial loss. Thus, the H3K27me3 Loss rate was lower than reported previously, perhaps reflecting differences among histological subgroups. Lyskjaer et al[43] found that 76% of MPNSTs with classical histological features had lost H3K27me3, compared to only 23% of MPNSTs with heterologous elements or low-grade components. The complete loss rate of the epithelioid MPNST subtype was 0%.

Patel et al[3] reported that the 5-year head and neck MPNST DSS rate was 65.1%, based on analysis of the SEER database. Similar studies from single institutions reported 5-year DSS rates of 30% and 20%, and a 2-year DSS rate of 21%[14,44]. In our study, the 2- and 5-year DSS rates were 86% and 43%, respectively. Local recurrence and distant metastasis exerted a major influence on DSS. In our study, 43% (3/7) of patients developed local recurrence; two of these patients died and the other one was lost to follow-up. In total, 57% (4/7) of the patients developed distant metastases and 75% died. Both of the patients without local recurrence or distant metastasis are still alive. Other studies revealed that tumor size, stage, and surgical resection significantly influenced DSS[1,2].

Radical surgical resection is the mainstay of MPNST treatment[44,45]. In our study, 9 of 10 patients underwent wide excision; in the remaining case, the tumor was too large to excise. Adjuvant therapies, such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy, are now prescribed for MPNST patients. Some studies have suggested that radiation should be routine to improve survival and decrease the risk of recurrence[44,46]. Chemotherapy has been prescribed for those with large or recurrent tumors, but any role for chemotherapy as an MPNST treatment remains controversial[2]. In our study, both radiation and chemotherapy were prescribed for four patients, and radiation only for one. As our study included a relatively small number of cases, larger series are needed to validate the results.

CONCLUSION

In summary, MPNST is an uncommon and aggressive soft tissue sarcomas and the head and neck MPNST is extremely rare. Clinical and pathological characteristics of MPNST are not significant. The patients are with poor prognoses and associated with a high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis. Complete surgical resection is the main treatment.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): 0

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: D'Orazi V, Italy S-Editor: Liu JH L-Editor: A P-Editor: Zhang XD

References
1.  Arshi A, Tajudeen BA, St John M. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the head and neck: Demographics, clinicopathologic features, management, and treatment outcomes. Oral Oncol. 2015;51:1088-1094.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 28]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28]  [Article Influence: 3.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Ma C, Ow A, Shan OH, Wu Y, Zhang C, Sun J, Ji T, Pingarron Martin L, Wang L. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours in the head and neck region: retrospective analysis of clinicopathological features and treatment outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014;43:924-932.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 18]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Patel TD, Shaigany K, Fang CH, Park RC, Baredes S, Eloy JA. Comparative Analysis of Head and Neck and Non-Head and Neck Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;154:113-120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  do Amaral TL, Valiati R, de Andrade BA, Rumayor Piña A, Torres SR, Romañach MJ, Agostini M. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the lower labial mucosa: case report and literature review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2016;122:e64-e68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Cunha KS, Caruso AC, Faria PA, Silva LE, Pires AR, Geller M, Lopes VS, Moura-Neto RS. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: clinicopathological aspects, expression of p53 and survival. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67:963-968.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Zhang M, Wang Y, Jones S, Sausen M, McMahon K, Sharma R, Wang Q, Belzberg AJ, Chaichana K, Gallia GL, Gokaslan ZL, Riggins GJ, Wolinksy JP, Wood LD, Montgomery EA, Hruban RH, Kinzler KW, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Bettegowda C. Somatic mutations of SUZ12 in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1170-1172.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 198]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 206]  [Article Influence: 20.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  De Raedt T, Beert E, Pasmant E, Luscan A, Brems H, Ortonne N, Helin K, Hornick JL, Mautner V, Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Clapp W, Bradner J, Vidaud M, Upadhyaya M, Legius E, Cichowski K. PRC2 loss amplifies Ras-driven transcription and confers sensitivity to BRD4-based therapies. Nature. 2014;514:247-251.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 362]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 346]  [Article Influence: 34.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Lee W, Teckie S, Wiesner T, Ran L, Prieto Granada CN, Lin M, Zhu S, Cao Z, Liang Y, Sboner A, Tap WD, Fletcher JA, Huberman KH, Qin LX, Viale A, Singer S, Zheng D, Berger MF, Chen Y, Antonescu CR, Chi P. PRC2 is recurrently inactivated through EED or SUZ12 loss in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Nat Genet. 2014;46:1227-1232.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 455]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 425]  [Article Influence: 42.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Prieto-Granada CN, Wiesner T, Messina JL, Jungbluth AA, Chi P, Antonescu CR. Loss of H3K27me3 Expression Is a Highly Sensitive Marker for Sporadic and Radiation-induced MPNST. Am J Surg Pathol. 2016;40:479-489.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 176]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 186]  [Article Influence: 23.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Farid M, Demicco EG, Garcia R, Ahn L, Merola PR, Cioffi A, Maki RG. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncologist. 2014;19:193-201.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 238]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 226]  [Article Influence: 22.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Mullins BT, Hackman T. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the head and neck: a case series and literature review. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2014;2014:368920.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Wang Y, Wang RR.   Malignant Neurilemmoma of the Head and Neck: a clinicopathologic, Immunohistochemical, and Imaging Study of 8 Cases. 2015; 25: 360-364.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
13.  Probst M, Koerdt S, Ritschl LM, Bissinger O, Liesche F, Gempt J, Meyer B, Burian E, Lummel N, Kolk A. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor in the Course of the Mandibular Nerve. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:e130-e137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Minovi A, Basten O, Hunter B, Draf W, Bockmühl U. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the head and neck: management of 10 cases and literature review. Head Neck. 2007;29:439-445.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 80]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 83]  [Article Influence: 4.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Lee S, Lee C, Kim JK, Nam W. An unusual presentation of intraosseous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48:20180341.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Yaga US, Shivakumar R, Kumar MA, Sathyaprakash. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor: A rarity. Indian J Dent. 2015;6:53-56.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Majumdar S, Kotina S, Mahesh N, Uppala D, Kumar SP. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor -A Rare Malignancy in Mandible. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10:ZD12-ZD13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Zakhary I, Elsalanty M, Ishag I, Taher T, Hassan M, Gehani R, Orafi M, El-Mekkawi H. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:762-766.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 7]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Che Z, Nam W, Park WS, Kim HJ, Cha IH, Kim HS, Yook JI, Kim J, Lee SH. Intraosseous nerve sheath tumors in the jaws. Yonsei Med J. 2006;47:264-270.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 25]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Sham ME, Ghorpade, Shetty A, Hari S, Vinay. Malignant peripheral nerve cell tumour. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010;9:68-71.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 16]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 1.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
21.  Prem S, Gangothria S, Reddyb KS. Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor of the Mandible: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Journal of Neurology Research. 2011;.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
22.  Salla JT, Johann AC, Garcia BG, Aguiar MC, Mesquita RA. Retrospective analysis of oral peripheral nerve sheath tumors in Brazilians. Braz Oral Res. 2009;23:43-48.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 32]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 38]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
23.  Patel S, Pathak J, Dekate K, Mohanty N. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST) of mandible: solving the perplexity. BMJ Case Rep. 2015;2015.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
24.  Kumar P, Surya V, Urs AB, Augustine J, Mohanty S, Gupta S. Sarcomas of the Oral and Maxillofacial Region: Analysis of 26 Cases with Emphasis on Diagnostic Challenges. Pathol Oncol Res. 2019;25:593-601.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
25.  Naikmasur VG, Guttal KS, Kaveriappa S, Datta KS. Rapidly progressing soft tissue mass of the anterior mandibular region. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:607-611.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
26.  Bullock MJ, Bedard YC, Bell RS, Kandel R. Intraosseous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. Report of a case and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119:367-370.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
27.  Kameyama Y, Maeda H, Nakane S, Maeda S, Takai Y, Fukaya M. Malignant schwannoma of the maxilla in a patient without neurofibromatosis. Histopathology. 1987;11:1205-1208.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
28.  Urade M, Fujimoto Y, Ogura T, Matsuya T. Malignant schwannoma and melanoma occurring in the maxilla. J Osaka Univ Dent Sch. 1990;30:153-156.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
29.  Patil K, Mahima VG, Ambika L. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour: an elusive diagnosis. Indian J Dent Res. 2007;18:19-22.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
30.  Janardhanan M, Rakesh S, Vinod Kumar R. Intraoral presentation of multiple malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors associated with neurofibromatosis-1. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2011;15:46-51.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 8]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
31.  Ali NS, Junaid M, Aftab K. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of maxilla. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2011;21:420-422.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
32.  Tamgadge S, Modak N, Tamgadge AP, Bhalerao S. Intraosseous malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of maxilla: A case report with review of the literature. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014;11:405-410.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
33.  Neetha MC, Anupama DH, Shashikanth MC. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the maxilla. Indian J Dent Res. 2004;15:110-3.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
34.  Muraki Y, Tateishi A, Tominaga K, Fukuda J, Haneji T, Iwata Y. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour in the maxilla associated with von Recklinghausen's disease. Oral Dis. 1999;5:250-252.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
35.  Ersen A, Pekmezci M, Folpe AL, Tihan T. Comparision of New Diagnostic Tools for Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors. Pathol Oncol Res. 2017;23:393-398.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
36.  Otsuka H, Kohashi K, Yoshimoto M, Ishihara S, Toda Y, Yamada Y, Yamamoto H, Nakashima Y, Oda Y. Immunohistochemical evaluation of H3K27 trimethylation in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Pathol Res Pract. 2018;214:417-425.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 27]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
37.  Cleven AH, Sannaa GA, Briaire-de Bruijn I, Ingram DR, van de Rijn M, Rubin BP, de Vries MW, Watson KL, Torres KE, Wang WL, van Duinen SG, Hogendoorn PC, Lazar AJ, Bovée JV. Loss of H3K27 tri-methylation is a diagnostic marker for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors and an indicator for an inferior survival. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:582-590.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 128]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 126]  [Article Influence: 15.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
38.  Schaefer IM, Fletcher CD, Hornick JL. Loss of H3K27 trimethylation distinguishes malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors from histologic mimics. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:4-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 196]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 190]  [Article Influence: 23.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
39.  Le Guellec S, Macagno N, Velasco V, Lamant L, Lae M, Filleron T, Malissen N, Cassagnau E, Terrier P, Chevreau C, Ranchere-Vince D, Coindre JM. Loss of H3K27 trimethylation is not suitable for distinguishing malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor from melanoma: a study of 387 cases including mimicking lesions. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1677-1687.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 58]  [Article Influence: 8.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
40.  Röhrich M, Koelsche C, Schrimpf D, Capper D, Sahm F, Kratz A, Reuss J, Hovestadt V, Jones DT, Bewerunge-Hudler M, Becker A, Weis J, Mawrin C, Mittelbronn M, Perry A, Mautner VF, Mechtersheimer G, Hartmann C, Okuducu AF, Arp M, Seiz-Rosenhagen M, Hänggi D, Heim S, Paulus W, Schittenhelm J, Ahmadi R, Herold-Mende C, Unterberg A, Pfister SM, von Deimling A, Reuss DE. Methylation-based classification of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131:877-887.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 118]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 125]  [Article Influence: 15.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
41.  Pekmezci M, Cuevas-Ocampo AK, Perry A, Horvai AE. Significance of H3K27me3 loss in the diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Mod Pathol. 2017;30:1710-1719.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 41]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 6.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
42.  Makise N, Sekimizu M, Kubo T, Wakai S, Hiraoka N, Komiyama M, Fukayama M, Kawai A, Ichikawa H, Yoshida A. Clarifying the Distinction Between Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumor and Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma: A Critical Reappraisal of the Diagnostic Utility of MDM2 and H3K27me3 Status. Am J Surg Pathol. 2018;42:656-664.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 29]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 31]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
43.  Lyskjaer I, Lindsay D, Tirabosco R, Steele CD, Lombard P, Strobl AC, Rocha AM, Davies C, Ye H, Bekers E, Ingruber J, Lechner M, Amary F, Pillay N, Flanagan AM. H3K27me3 expression and methylation status in histological variants of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours. J Pathol. 2020;252:151-164.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
44.  Kar M, Deo SV, Shukla NK, Malik A, DattaGupta S, Mohanti BK, Thulkar S. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST)--clinicopathological study and treatment outcome of twenty-four cases. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4:55.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 119]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 7.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
45.  Zou C, Smith KD, Liu J, Lahat G, Myers S, Wang WL, Zhang W, McCutcheon IE, Slopis JM, Lazar AJ, Pollock RE, Lev D. Clinical, pathological, and molecular variables predictive of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor outcome. Ann Surg. 2009;249:1014-1022.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 201]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 213]  [Article Influence: 14.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
46.  Anghileri M, Miceli R, Fiore M, Mariani L, Ferrari A, Mussi C, Lozza L, Collini P, Olmi P, Casali PG, Pilotti S, Gronchi A. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: prognostic factors and survival in a series of patients treated at a single institution. Cancer. 2006;107:1065-1074.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 278]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 278]  [Article Influence: 15.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]