Retrospective Study Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 16, 2023; 11(2): 357-365
Published online Jan 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.357
Is fascial closure required for a 12-mm trocar? A comparative study on trocar site hernia with long-term follow up
Santi Krittiyanitsakun, Chawisa Nampoolsuksan, Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn, Tharathorn Suwatthanarak, Nicha Srisuworanan, Voraboot Taweerutchana, Thammawat Parakonthun, Chainarong Phalanusitthepha, Jirawat Swangsri, Thawatchai Akaraviputh, Asada Methasate, Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul, Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
ORCID number: Santi Krittiyanitsakun (0000-0002-6268-1951); Chawisa Nampoolsuksan (0000-0002-5990-4704); Thikhamporn Tawantanakorn (0000-0001-8468-4347); Tharathorn Suwatthanarak (0000-0002-5409-284X); Nicha Srisuworanan (0000-0003-3079-9848); Voraboot Taweerutchana (0000-0003-2475-7553); Thammawat Parakonthun (0000-0002-2990-0649); Chainarong Phalanusitthepha (0000-0003-0931-0091); Jirawat Swangsri (0000-0003-3721-1859); Thawatchai Akaraviputh (0000-0003-2969-2648); Asada Methasate (0000-0002-8726-3651); Vitoon Chinswangwatanakul (0000-0001-9662-1669); Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga (0000-0002-1980-7782).
Author contributions: Trakarnsanga A conceived the study, revised the manuscript, and participated in its coordination; Krittiyanitsakun S and Nampoolsuksan C participated in the database collection and drafted the manuscript; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This single-center retrospective study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (SIRB Protocol No. 900/2562).
Informed consent statement: All of the patient consents give Associated Professor Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga MD. and his team at Minimally Invasive Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand permission to publish reproduce and distribute, the attached case study, regarding trocar site hernia. The authors aware that the case study does not mention patient name, address but it does reflect patient medical care, gender, age, and medical history. All of the patients will not be paid in any manner for use of the case study as described above. They will not receive any royalties or other compensation in connection with any suck publication or use. All of the patients are not required to sign the consent form, and they may refuse to do so. Their medical treatment and payment for healthcare will not be affected by whether or not they sign the consent form. They may withdraw these consents for any future sharing at any time by notifying the research team, but their withdrawal will not affect information that has already been shared or published. This authorization has no expired date.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Data sharing statement: The dataset utilized during the current study is available within the institutional collected data system that was used under Siriraj’s institutional review board committee approval for this study. Data are available upon reasonable request with permission of Siriraj’s institutional review board committee.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Atthaphorn Trakarnsanga, MD, Associate Professor, Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 2 Prannok, Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand. atthaphorn.tra@mahidol.ac.th
Received: September 2, 2022
Peer-review started: September 2, 2022
First decision: October 20, 2022
Revised: November 6, 2022
Accepted: January 5, 2023
Article in press: January 5, 2023
Published online: January 16, 2023

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Despite the infrequency of trocar site hernias (TSHs), fascial closure continues to be recommended for their prevention when using a ≥ 10-mm trocar.

AIM

To identify the necessity of fascial closure for a 12-mm nonbladed trocar incision in minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

METHODS

Between July 2010 and December 2018, all patients who underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery at the Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit of Siriraj Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent cross-sectional imaging for TSH assessment. Clinicopathological characteristics were recorded. Incidence rates of TSH and postoperative results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 254 patients included, 70 (111 ports) were in the fascial closure (closed) group and 184 (279 ports) were in the nonfascial closure (open) group. The median follow up duration was 43 mo. During follow up, three patients in the open group developed TSHs, whereas none in the closed group developed the condition (1.1% vs 0%, P = 0.561). All TSHs occurred in the right lower abdomen. Patients whose drains were placed through the same incision had higher rates of TSHs compared with those without the drain. The open group had a significantly shorter operative time and lower blood loss than the closed group.

CONCLUSION

Routine performance of fascial closure when using a 12-mm nonbladed trocar may not be needed. However, further prospective studies with cross-sectional imaging follow-up and larger sample size are needed to confirm this finding.

Key Words: Trocar site hernia, Port site hernia, Fascial closure, Laparoscopic colorectal surgery, Nonbladed trocar

Core Tip: The incidence of trocar site hernias (TSHs) varied from 0.1% to 2%. Previous studies and guidelines have also suggested fascial closure when using a > 10-mm trocar. The findings from this study demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of TSHs between facial closure and nonclosure groups (0% vs 1.1%, P = 0.561) when the median clinical follow-up duration was 41 mo. Therefore, fascial closure may be selectively omitted when using a 12-mm nonbladed trocar.


  • Citation: Krittiyanitsakun S, Nampoolsuksan C, Tawantanakorn T, Suwatthanarak T, Srisuworanan N, Taweerutchana V, Parakonthun T, Phalanusitthepha C, Swangsri J, Akaraviputh T, Methasate A, Chinswangwatanakul V, Trakarnsanga A. Is fascial closure required for a 12-mm trocar? A comparative study on trocar site hernia with long-term follow up. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(2): 357-365
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i2/357.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i2.357

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive surgical approaches have gained acceptance worldwide, given their superior benefits in terms of postoperative recovery and wound healing. However, certain complications can occur following laparoscopy, including trocar site hernias (TSHs), the incidence of which varies from 0.1% to 2%[1,2]. Clinical presentation of patients can range from asymptomatic to bowel strangulation in case of delayed diagnosis[3]. Despite the multifactorial etiology of this condition, older age, obesity, and wound infection have been identified to be the predisposing factors[4-6]. Several studies have also suggested fascial defect closure when using a ≥ 10-mm trocar[7-9]. Hence, emphasis should be placed on this preventable condition in high-risk patients.

Similarly, minimally invasive colorectal surgeries have become the standard treatment approach at many centers. Indeed, laparoscopy facilitates meticulous dissection and bowel transection using staplers. Equivalent long-term oncologic outcomes could be achieved by minimizing postoperative morbidities and promoting early recovery of bowel function[10-12]. During the procedure, 12-mm ports are commonly used for 10-mm clips or stapler application. Unlike routine midline incision closure, fascial closure of a 12-mm port incision remains optional. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the necessity of fascial closure of the 12-mm nonbladed trocar incision made during colorectal surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design

This single-center retrospective study was approved by the Siriraj Institutional Review Board (Protocol No. 900/2562). Data were collected from July 2010 to December 2018.

Patients

All patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent nonurgent minimally invasive colorectal surgery at the Minimally Invasive Surgery Unit of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand, were included. Patients who had incomplete medical records, had connective tissue disease, underwent different fascial closure methods, required conversion to open surgery, < 12 mo of follow up, and did not undergo postoperative cross-sectional imaging were excluded.

Procedures

We entered the abdominal cavity from the periumbilical region using Hasson’s open technique for laparoscopic surgery or mini-midline incision for hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery to create a pneumoperitoneum. A 12-mm nonbladed trocar was then inserted at a nonperiumbilical location according to the type of surgery. After completing the laparoscopic phase, a mini-midline incision that extended from the periumbilical incision was created for specimen retrieval. A 10-mm abdominal drain was then placed, as specified by the intraoperative findings. The abdominal fascia at the midline incision was closed using a continuous absorbable suture. Closure of the 12-mm trocar site was optional and depended on the surgeon’s preference. The techniques included direct suture with absorbable material and closure under laparoscopic direct vision using the suture passer needle technique. Because of the retrospective nature of our study, details regarding TSHs and repair techniques could not be clearly determined. All patients were followed up using cross-sectional imaging based on the primary disease.

Outcome measurement

The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, benign prostatic hyperplasia, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, Modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, serum albumin level, creatinine level, disease diagnosis, type of operation, and number and location of the 12-mm port, were reviewed. The primary outcome was the incidence of TSHs in the nonperiumbilical area, which was diagnosed with postoperative clinical examination or cross-sectional imaging. The date of diagnosis and further management were recorded. Furthermore, details regarding the primary surgery, complications according to the Clavien–Dindo classification[13], and incidence rates of incisional and parastomal hernia were also assessed.

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 21. The variables were expressed as number (%), mean ± SD, and median with interquartile range (IQR). The data were analyzed using student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and chi-square test. TSH incidence was analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier curve and log-rank test. P values < 0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

A total of 537 patients with colorectal diseases underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery. After applying the exclusion criteria, 254 patients (390 ports) were ultimately included in the study. To facilitate comparison, we categorized 70 patients (111 ports) into the fascial closure (closed) group and 184 (279 ports) into the nonfascial closure (open) group (Figure 1). Both groups had comparable baseline characteristics and operative details, except for a higher body mass index in the open group. Table 1 summarizes the clinicopathological characteristics of the patients.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Flowchart of analysis. EL: Exploratory laparotomy; CNT: Connective tissue; F/U: Follow up.
Table 1 Clinicopathological characteristics.

Closed (n = 70)
Open (n = 184)
P value
Age 63 ± 1263 ± 110.461
Male sex38 (54.3)100 (54.3)0.993
Body mass index (kg/m2)23 ± 324 ± 40.024
Diabetes mellitus12 (17.1)44 (23.9)0.245
Benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 138)3 (7.9)9 (9.0)1.000
ASA classification0.634
113 (18.6)29 (15.8)
247 (67.1)120 (65.2)
310 (14.3)35 (19.0)
Modified CCI score4 (3.6)4 (3.6)0.958
Albumin ≥ 3 g/dL59 (85.5)156 (88.1)0.581
Creatinine ≥ 2 mg/dL2 (2.9)5 (2.7)1.000
Disease diagnosis0.327
Benign0 (0)5 (2.7)
Malignancy70 (100)179 (97.3)
Operations0.193
Right hemicolectomy7 (10)28 (15.2)
Left hemicolectomy29 (41.4)57 (31.0)
Subtotal colectomy0 (0)1 (0.5)
LAR/APR32 (45.7)97 (52.7)
Total proctocolectomy1 (1.4)0 (0)
Others1 (1.4)1 (0.5)
Numbers of 12-mm port per person0.511
129 (41.4)90 (48.9)
241 (58.6)93 (50.5)
30 (0)1 (0.5)

Three patients (3/279 ports, 1.1% per port) in the open group developed TSHs, whereas none in the closed group developed TSHs (0/111 port, 0% per port). There was no significant difference in the incidence of TSHs between the two groups (P = 0.561). The median clinical follow-up duration was 41 mo (IQR 25, 63), whereas the median cross-sectional imaging follow-up duration was 31 mo (IQR 20, 51). Figure 2 demonstrates the Kaplan–Meier analysis of TSH events. Three patients with TSHs were women with adenocarcinoma of the colon who underwent anterior resection. Surveillance computed tomography found that all such patients developed TSHs in the right lower quadrant area containing omental fat. The time to diagnosis ranged from 13 to 34 mo. One patient underwent elective hernia repair at another hospital. Table 2 lists the clinical data. Moreover, one of the three patients developed a concomitant asymptomatic incisional hernia at the midline incision. There were no significant correlations between TSHs and incisional hernia (P = 0.19). None of the patients with TSHs underwent stoma creation during the primary surgery. Subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of TSHs was slightly higher in patients with drain placement than in those without drain placement (3.1% vs 0.5%, P = 0.371).

Figure 2
Figure 2 Kaplan–Meier analysis of trocar site hernia events. GR: Group.
Table 2 Clinical data of three patients with trocar sire hernia.

Age
BMI
ASA
Alb
Cr
Disease location
Operation
Drain
Time to diagnosis
Treatment
17719.932.92.4RectosigmoidHALSNo34 moNone
25929.724.30.5SigmoidLaparoscopicRLQ13 moOpen repair
37223.434.61.3SigmoidHALSRLQ31 moNone

The open group showed shorter operative time and lower blood loss than the closed group. Moreover, the open group experienced significantly lower fitted postoperative pain at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h (P = 0.018) (Figure 3). The length of the hospital stay was comparable between the two groups. No significant difference in complications, such as surgical site infection, anastomosis leakage/bleeding, small bowel obstruction, ileus, arrhythmia, electrolyte imbalance, and urinary tract infection, was observed. In our study, surgical site infection occurred at the midline incision (Table 3).

Figure 3
Figure 3 Fitted postoperative pain.
Table 3 Secondary outcomes.

Closed (n = 70)
Open (n = 184)
P value
Operative time (minute)170 (110, 240)123 (100, 185)0.004
Estimated blood loss (mL)50 (30, 11)30 (20, 100)0.011
Length of hospital stay (day)5 (5, 7)5 (4, 6)0.122
Complications0.228
CD-16 (8.6)9 (4.9)
CD-27 (10)10 (5.4)
CD-32 (2.9)3 (1.6)
CD-4, 500
DISCUSSION

At present, laparoscopic surgery is a globally acceptable approach across many fields of surgery. Unfortunately, the development of postoperative TSHs remains one of its specific complications. Although prior studies have reported the rare incidence of TSHs after surgery, this complication can be avoided with proper intraoperative management. The predisposing factors for developing hernias may comprise both patient-related instrument-related factors[3,14]. To improve the surgical outcomes and lessen the incidence of TSHs, modifications to the laparoscopic trocar tip have been attempted. Indeed, one study showed that a bladeless trocar allows tissue penetration without cutting the abdominal muscle fibers, which reduces trocar site bleeding and overall complications[15]. However, some laparoscopic instruments may require trocars with larger diameters as working ports. Nonetheless, routine closure of these fascial defects remains controversial. Owing to the potentially harmful consequences, some studies have recommended closing the defect when using a 10-mm trocar[3,16].

Previously, prospective data on other laparoscopic procedures have proven the safety and feasibility of leaving the fascia open after the application of a 10-mm trocar[17]. Our study mainly aimed to determine the necessity of the fascial closure of a 12-mm trocar after minimally invasive colorectal surgeries. Our results demonstrated that routine closure provided no significant benefit. The incidence of TSHs observed in our series was 1.1%, which was comparable to that stated in other reports. All cases underwent cross-sectional imaging based on the index diagnosis. We believe that reliable results were achieved, given that computed tomography is considered one of the best methods for occult hernia detection[18,19]. In 2004, Tonouchi et al[9] classified TSHs into three types. All three cases of TSHs included in this study were of late-onset type. No bowel obstruction or strangulation occurred during the follow-up. Concerning the precipitating factors, only advanced age was found in two patients. None of them were obese or had prior wound infections at the trocar site. Moreover, Sakamoto et al[20] found TSHs after laparoscopic colectomy in elderly patients with low body mass index. Frailty may lead to decreased abdominal wall strength over time. Furthermore, another study found a relationship between TSH incidence and abdominal drain placement. Based on these findings, all patients with TSH also underwent drain placement at the same location of the TSHs after the trocar was removed intraoperatively[20].

Regarding other postoperative results, this study indicated that nonfascial closure, in particular, yielded several advantages. Closure defect usually takes time and may prolong the duration of operation[2]. Postoperative pain is also greater with transfascial suture. However, these parameters may be confounded by various factors. Operative time varies owing to cancer staging or degree of adhesion in benign diseases. The amount of blood loss may be attributed to intraoperative findings or surgical techniques.

Another limitation of our study is its retrospective design. Details regarding the TSHs and repair techniques could not be clearly determined. Given the low TSH rates in our population, factors associated with TSH occurrence could not be identified. Moreover, there was no patient with TSH in the closed group, whereas, 1.1% of TSH was identified in the open group. There was no statistical significance in this study. Further prospective studies with cross-sectional imaging follow-up and larger sample size should be conducted to confirm whether the outcomes of nonfascial closure are not inferior to those of fascial closure.

CONCLUSION

Fascial closure may be selectively omitted when using a 12-mm nonbladed trocar. To achieve greater benefit from minimally invasive surgery, optimal intraoperative evaluation and decision making are mandatory for TSH prevention.

ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

The incidence of trocar site hernias (TSHs) varies from 0.1% to 2%. Several studies have also suggested fascial defect closure when using a ≥ 10-mm trocar, especially for midline incision and bladed trocar.

Research motivation

The findings from this study imply that there is no significant difference in TSH between the closure and nonclosure groups for 12-mm nonbladed trocar. However, further prospective studies with a larger sample size are required.

Research objectives

To identify the necessity of fascial closure for a 12-mm nonbladed trocar incision in minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Research methods

Closure or nonclosure was decided based on the surgeon’s preference. All patients were followed up via cross-sectional imaging based on the primary disease.

Research results

Three patients in the open group developed TSHs, whereas none in the closed group developed TSHs (1.1% vs 0%, P = 0.561). The open group had a significantly shorter operative time and lower blood loss than the closed group.

Research conclusions

Fascial closure may be selectively omitted when using a 12-mm nonbladed trocar.

Research perspectives

Further prospective studies should be conducted with a larger sample size.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Invited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: Thailand

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): E

P-Reviewer: Ferreira GSA, Brazil; Kayano H, Japan; Wani A, India S-Editor: Fan JR L-Editor: A P-Editor: Fan JR

References
1.  Cuesta MA, Bonjer HJ.   Treatment of postoperative complication after digestive surgery. Springer; 2014.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
2.  Gutierrez M, Stuparich M, Behbehani S, Nahas S. Does closure of fascia, type, and location of trocar influence occurrence of port site hernias? Surg Endosc. 2020;34:5250-5258.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 5.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Pulle MV, Siddhartha R, Dey A, Mittal T, Malik VK. Port site hernia in laparoscopic surgery: mechanism, prevention and management. Curr Med Res Pract. 2015;5:130-137.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Ciscar A, Badia JM, Novell F, Bolívar S, Mans E. Incidence and risk factors for trocar-site incisional hernia detected by clinical and ultrasound examination: a prospective observational study. BMC Surg. 2020;20:330.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic surgery: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia. 2011;15:113-121.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 125]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 131]  [Article Influence: 9.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
6.  Sadava EE, Kerman Cabo J, Carballo FH, Bun ME, Rotholtz NA. Incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Is there any factor associated? Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3421-3424.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F; European Hernia Society. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia. 2015;19:1-24.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 333]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 241]  [Article Influence: 26.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, Reitsma JB, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg. 2012;99:315-323.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 129]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 123]  [Article Influence: 9.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M. Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg. 2004;139:1248-1256.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 273]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 298]  [Article Influence: 15.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (1)]
10.  Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM. Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional vs laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2013;100:75-82.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 483]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 456]  [Article Influence: 38.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Chern YJ, Hung HY, You JF, Hsu YJ, Chiang JM, Hsieh PS, Tsai WS. Advantage of laparoscopy surgery for elderly colorectal cancer patients without compromising oncologic outcome. BMC Surg. 2020;20:294.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Pascual M, Salvans S, Pera M. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:704-717.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 76]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 69]  [Article Influence: 8.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205-213.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 18532]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21971]  [Article Influence: 1098.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Sabajo CR, Olthof PB, Roos D, Dekker JWT. Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic-Assisted Right Hemicolectomy. World J Surg. 2019;43:3172-3178.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Blunt vs bladed trocars in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2312-2320.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 26]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 27]  [Article Influence: 2.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Pamela D, Roberto C, Francesco LM, Umberto M, Carla M, Vincenzo N, Stefano T, Eriberto F, Daniele G, Angelo D, Diego M, Micol Sole DP, Alessandro S, Maurizio B, Vito S, Nicola A, Francesco S. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic colectomy: a case report and literature review. ISRN Surg. 2011;2011:725601.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 17]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Singal R, Zaman M, Mittal A, Singal S, Sandhu K. No Need of Fascia Closure to Reduce Trocar Site Hernia Rate in Laparoscopic Surgery: A Prospective Study of 200 Non-Obese Patients. Gastroenterology Res. 2016;9:70-73.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 11]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Kroese LF, Sneiders D, Kleinrensink GJ, Muysoms F, Lange JF. Comparing different modalities for the diagnosis of incisional hernia: a systematic review. Hernia. 2018;22:229-242.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 56]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 48]  [Article Influence: 8.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  Naguib N, Rafique H, Dhruva Rao PK, Longworth T, Soukias JM, Masoud A. A review of the incidence of iatrogenic hernia in both laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: Using CT as the gold standard of detection, cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015;19:87-90.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 1.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Sakamoto K, Tashiro Y, Ono S, Sugimoto K, Ishiyama S, Yaginuma Y, Komiyama H, Kojima Y, Tanaka M, Goto M, Sengoku H, TomikiI Y. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic colectomy. J Japanese College Surg. 2009;34:162-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]