Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2020.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2021; 9(1): 148-162
Published online Jan 6, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i1.148
Figure 1
Figure 1 Pretreatment facial photographs.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Pretreatment oral photographs.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The study casts. A: Pretreatment study casts; B: Designed postsurgical study casts; C: Posttreatment study casts.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Initial radiograph. A: Lateral cephalometric radiograph; B: Posteroanterior radiograph; C: Panoramic radiograph.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Cone beam computed tomography image of the temporomandibular joint. A: Pretreatment; B: Posttreatment.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Three-dimensional image of facial asymmetry generated from cone beam computed tomography and facial asymmetry analysis.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Facial and intraoral photographs at the first visit after surgery.
Figure 8
Figure 8 The process of orthodontic treatment.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Final facial photographs.
Figure 10
Figure 10 Final intraoral photographs.
Figure 11
Figure 11  Final radiograph. A: Lateral cephalometric radiograph; B: Posteroanterior radiograph; C: Panoramic radiograph.
Figure 12
Figure 12  Tracing and superimposition of cephalograms at pretreatment (red) and posttreatment (blue). A: Cranial base superimposition to evaluate surgical changes in bone and soft tissues on lateral cephalogram; B: Maxillary superimposition on lateral cephalogram; C: Mandibular superimposition to evaluate tooth movement, extrusion and incisor repositioning on lateral cephalogram; D: Tracing and superimposition of posteroanterior cephalograms at pretreatment (red) and posttreatment (blue).