Copyright
©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2018; 6(13): 611-623
Published online Nov 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611
Published online Nov 6, 2018. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study selection process.
HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient; NSBB: Nonselective beta-blockers.
Figure 2 Correlation between acute and chronic changes in HVPG in the traditional nonselective beta-blockers group.
Among 52 patients, 27 had a second hemodynamic study after 26.3 ± 12.8 wk. HVPG: Hepatic venous pressure gradient.
Figure 3 Cumulative probability of decompensation in patients with previously compensated liver disease (A) and patients with a history of hepatic decompensation (B).
Patients with acute response receiving traditional NSBB are represented by a continuous line, and acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol are represented by a dashed line. P value corresponds to log-rank test at the end of follow-up. NSBB: Nonselective beta-blockers.
Figure 4 Cumulative probability of transplant-free survival in patients with previously compensated liver disease (A) and patients with a history of hepatic decompensation (B).
Patients with acute response receiving traditional NSBB are represented by a continuous line, and acute nonresponders receiving carvedilol are represented by a dashed line. P value corresponds to log-rank test at the end of follow-up. NSBB: Nonselective beta-blockers.
- Citation: Fortea JI, Puente Á, Ruiz P, Ezcurra I, Vaquero J, Cuadrado A, Arias-Loste MT, Cabezas J, Llerena S, Iruzubieta P, Rodríguez-Lope C, Huelin P, Casafont F, Fábrega E, Crespo J. Impact of an acute hemodynamic response-guided protocol for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. World J Clin Cases 2018; 6(13): 611-623
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v6/i13/611.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v6.i13.611