Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2025; 13(18): 103777
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i18.103777
Figure 1
Figure 1 The preoperative images of the patient. A: X-ray image; B: 3D computed tomography image.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The postoperative X-ray of the patient.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Photograph of the patient before surgery to remove the plate. A and B: Shoulder abduction; C: Shoulder extension.
Figure 4
Figure 4 X-ray of the patient reviewed one year later. A: X-ray image; B: and C: CT image.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Plate being removed. A and B: Photo of the plate being removed.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Schematic diagram of the new classification.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Images of patient 1. A: 3D computed tomography (CT) image; B: CT images.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Images of patient 2. A and B: 3D computed tomography (CT) images of patient 2; C: CT images of patient 2.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Comparison between new and old techniques. A: The conventional hook plate technique; B: The modified hook plate technique.
Figure 10
Figure 10 The images of patients classified as Type II. A: Preoperative computed tomography (CT) image of the patient classified as Type II; B: Postoperative X-ray of the patient classified as Type II; C: Preoperative CT images of another patients classified as Type II; D: Postoperative X-ray of another patient classified as Type II.
Figure 11
Figure 11 Computed tomography images of patient 3. A and B: 3D computed tomography (CT) images of patient 3; C and D: CT images of patient 3.