Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Mar 6, 2024; 12(7): 1346-1355
Published online Mar 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i7.1346
Figure 1
Figure 1 Preoperative clinical view. An increase in volume corresponding to the circumscribed, well delimited lesion, between 2.2 and 2.3.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Preoperative periapical radiograph. A: X-ray prior to root canal treatment, 6 years ago; B: Current initial radiograph showing a well-defined and circumscribed radiolucent area at the apex of tooth 22.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Cone-beam computed tomography view. A: Sagittal; B: Axial; C: Coronal.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Three-dimensional model reconstruction. Note the absence of vestibular wall.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Histological examination. A: Hematoxylin and eosin-stained histological sections exhibiting cavity lined by non-keratinized odontogenic epithelium with intracapsular projections beneath [Histological examination (H&E); × 20]; B: Photomicrograph showing intense, mixed inflammatory infiltrates and foamy macrophages in the fibrous capsule (H&E; × 40).
Figure 6
Figure 6 Intraoperative photography. A: Complete enucleation of the lesion; B: Adequate sealing of the canal with biodentine, after apicectomy.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Immediate postoperative periapical radiograph.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Postoperative clinical view. A: Immediate; B: After 10 d; C: After 4 months.
Figure 9
Figure 9 6 months postoperative cone-beam computed tomography view. A: Sagittal; B: Axial; C: Coronal.
Figure 10
Figure 10  Six months postoperative three-dimensional model reconstruction.