Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 26, 2024; 12(21): 4703-4716
Published online Jul 26, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4703
Figure 1
Figure 1 Literature screening flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Risk of bias summary.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The results of meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for clinical efficacy rate. The Z-value curve crossed the boundary value in the second study, indicating that the meta-analysis results of clinical efficacy rate are conclusive. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; RIS: Required information size.
Figure 4
Figure 4 The results of meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for mucosal improvement rate. The Z-value curve crossed the boundary value in the second study, indicating that the meta-analysis results of mucosal improvement rate are conclusive. M-H: Mantel-Haenszel; RIS: Required information size.
Figure 5
Figure 5 The results of meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for duration of syndromes. A: Duration of abdominal pain; B: Duration of diarrhea; C: Duration of hematochezia. The three Z-value curves all crossed the boundary value in the first study, indicating that the meta-analysis results of duration of abdominal pain, duration of diarrhea, and duration of hematochezia are conclusive. IV: Inverse variance; SD: Standard deviation; RIS: Required information size.
Figure 6
Figure 6 The results of meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis for inflammatory factors. The two Z-value curves all crossed the boundary value in the second study, indicating that the meta-analysis results of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin (IL)-6 are conclusive. A: TNF-α; B: IL-6. IV: Inverse variance; SD: Standard deviation; RIS: Required information size.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Publication bias assessment.