Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2024; 12(13): 2182-2193
Published online May 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i13.2182
Figure 1
Figure 1 Flow chart of study.
Figure 2
Figure 2 A nomogram model for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-yr overall survival in patients with Chinese type for gastric cancer liver metastases type III.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Area under the receiver operating curve for development cohort and validation cohort. A-C: Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 1-, 3-, and 5-yr prognostic models for Chinese type for gastric cancer liver metastases (C-GCLM) type III patients in the developed cohort; D-F: AUC of the 1-, 3-, and 5-yr prognostic models of C-GCLM type III patients in the validation cohort.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Calibration curves for development cohort andvalidation cohort. A-C: Calibration curves of 1-, 3-, and 5-yr prognostic models for Chinese type for gastric cancer liver metastases (C-GCLM) type III patients in the development cohort; D-F: Validate the calibration curve of the 1-, 3-, and 5-yr prognostic models for C-GCLM type III patients in the validation cohort.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Decision analysis curves for development cohort and validation cohort. A-C: Decision analysis curves (DAC) of 1-, 3-, and 5-yr prognostic models for Chinese type for gastric cancer liver metastases (C-GCLM) type III patients in the development cohort; D-F: DAC of 1-, 3- and 5-yr prognostic models for C-GCLM type III patients in the validation cohort.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Kaplan-Meier survival curves for each predictor. A: Albumin; B: Extrahepatic metastases; C: Surgery; D: Tumor size; E: Chemotherapy.