Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2023; 11(19): 4567-4578
Published online Jul 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4567
Published online Jul 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4567
Figure 1 Flow diagram of the screening and selection process in this study.
ABSI: A body shape index; PCL: Posterior cruciate ligament; ACLR: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Figure 2 Comparison of knee joint function between High-a body shape index group and Low-a body shape index group after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
A: Range of motion (ROM) scores; B: Quadriceps atrophy index; C: Lysholm scores; D: Return to sport (RTS) completion rate. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01 vs Low-a body shape index (ABSI) group.
Figure 3 Comparison of Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score between the High-a body shape index group and Low-a body shape index group after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
A: Symptoms; B: Pain; C: Activity of daily living (ADL); D: Sports; E: Quality of life (QOL). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation; aP < 0.05, bP < 0.01 vs Low-a body shape index group (ABSI).
- Citation: Wang YJ, Zhang JC, Zhang YZ, Liu YH. Assessment of functional prognosis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes based on a body shape index. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(19): 4567-4578
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i19/4567.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4567