Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 6, 2023; 11(1): 201-209
Published online Jan 6, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i1.201
Figure 1
Figure 1 Abdominal contrast-enhanced ultrasound. A: Hepatic arterial phase; B: Hepatic portal vein phase; C: Hepatic delay phase.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Contrast-enhanced abdominal computerized tomography. A: Hepatic arterial phase; B: Hepatic portal phase; C: Hepatic venous phase.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed that the gastric antrum mucosa was intact and smooth.
Figure 4
Figure 4  Postoperative pathological examination. A: Hematoxylin and eosin staining. The tumor was identified to originate from the serous layer of the stomach and involve the muscularis externa of the stomach (20 ×). Upper right inset indicates small round cells with different sizes (original magnification, 200 ×); B-F: CD99-positive, vimentin-positive, FLI-1-positive, NSE-positive, amd SYN-positive cells (immunohistochemistry staining, 200 ×).
Figure 5
Figure 5 Contrast-enhanced abdominal computerized tomography 11 mo postoperatively.