Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 6, 2022; 10(25): 8980-8989
Published online Sep 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i25.8980
Figure 1
Figure 1 Extraoral and intraoral photographs. A-D: Extraoral profiles showed facial asymmetry; E-J: Intraoral photographs showed dental malocclusion, thin periodontal phenotype and GR. GR: gingival recession.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Cone-beam computed tomography. Cone-beam computed tomography suggested thin alveolar bone morphology.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Cephalometric summary. A: Cephalometric image; B: Cephalometric measurements.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Gingiva augmentation. Mucograft was grafted to #33-#43. A: Before the operation; B: Suture; C: Three weeks after the procedure.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Surgical procedure for periodontal accelerated osteogenic orthodontics and postoperative follow-up. A: Bone dehiscence can be observed after elevation of the full-thickness flap; B: The piezo surgery knife was used to perform decortication; C: Vertical alveolar decortication; D: The bone grafts were placed; E: The grafts were covered with an absorbable collagen membrane; F: Suture, the wound was well-closed; G: Image obtained two weeks after periodontal accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO); H: Three weeks after PAOO; I: Three months after PAOO; the postoperative images showed the wound healed well.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Completion of decompensation at 10 mo after periodontal accelerated osteogenic orthodontics. A-D: Extraoral profiles; E-J: Intraoral photographs.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Five months after orthognathic surgery. A-D: Extraoral profiles showing improvement of facial appearance; E-I: Intraoral photographs showing the correction of occlusion; J: Panoramic radiograph.
Figure 8
Figure 8  Panoramic radiograph after implant surgery.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Completion of treatment. A-D: Extraoral profiles; E-J: Intraoral photographs.