Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2022; 10(23): 8115-8123
Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8115
Figure 1
Figure 1 Intraoperative photos. A: The whole layer intestinal patch was sutured with the bladder edge in the standard cystoplasty procedure; B: The double-layer intestine seromuscular patch was sutured with the bladder incisal edge in the seromuscular bladder augmentation procedure.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Cystography before and after augmentation. A-D: the preoperative and postoperative cystography of standard cystoplasty and seromuscular bladder augmentation, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3 The preoperative and postoperative bladder volumes in the two groups were compared. The postoperative bladder volume of the two groups was significantly enlarged compared with the preoperative volume. aP < 0.0001. SC: Standard cystoplasty; SMBA: Seromuscular bladder augmentation.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Reaugmentation in children with failed seromuscular bladder augmentation. A: The neurogenic bladder before surgery; B: Patch contracture after seromuscular bladder augmentation: C: Reaugmentation with standard cystoplasty.