Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical treatment used worldwide to reduce spasticity. The procedure has undergone many changes since its introduction in the early 1900s, and currently, different centers vary in many aspects of the procedure. We surveyed centers on different continents regarding SDR indications, surgical techniques, and postoperative rehabilitation.

Ten centers worldwide with SDR experience participated in an online survey preparing for a pre-conference workshop in 2022. The main topics were patient characteristics, the selection process, surgery, and rehabilitation.

Universal suitable candidates for SDR were patients with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy, Gross Motor Function Classification System levels II or III, ages 5 to 7 years, and adequate strength, motor control, and access to postoperative rehabilitation. Centers differed in additional inclusion and exclusion criteria and the use of diagnostic tools. Both single- and multilevel approaches were used, with electrophysiological monitoring applied in all approaches. Intensive rehabilitation was recommended after surgery, followed by a less intensive program, with variations in duration, therapy frequency, modalities used, and follow-up periods.

This survey demonstrated many similarities in several aspects of the SDR procedure in centers performing SDR worldwide, while considerable variability was also seen. The results emphasize the need for standardized reporting of SDR procedures and outcome measures to enable international comparative studies. A Delphi procedure could be a first step to reaching a consensus on outcome measurements, which may lead to a consensus regarding the most suitable candidates, surgical techniques, and rehabilitation programs to improve functional outcomes.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a treatment for lower-extremity spasticity in disorders such as cerebral palsy (CP). "Selective" refers to sectioning nerve rootlets with the most abnormal responses on electromyography (EMG) upon intraoperative stimulation. EMG abnormalities can be classified by waveform appearance or by degree of spread throughout lower extremity muscles. We examine the relationship between different EMG waveforms and grades of spread. Intraoperative SDR EMG records from November 2009 through December 2021 were analyzed for waveform types and degrees of spread. Irregular, incremental, multiphasic, sustained, and clonic waveform patterns were considered more abnormal. Decremental, squared decremental, and squared waveforms were less abnormal. Degrees of spread were graded 0-4+, 4+ signifying the most abnormal spread. Distribution of grades of spread was compared between waveform patterns using pairwise Cochran-Armitage tests with Holm-Bonferroni correction. We hypothesized that more abnormal EMG waveform patterns would correlate with higher grades of spread. Sixty-three patients were included, with an average age of 8 years. Most had cerebral palsy (86%, n = 54). The remainder had brain malformations (8%, n = 5) and other etiologies (6%, n = 4). Higher grades of spread significantly increased the likelihood of multiphasic, sustained, or clonic patterns, compared to decremental, irregular, and squared patterns (p < .05). Squared waveforms decreased with higher grades of spread relative to other patterns (p < .05). Different EMG waveform patterns are associated with varying grades of spread in SDR, suggesting that evaluating both waveform pattern and degree of spread together can be useful in guiding rootlet sectioning.

To identify outcome predictors of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP) using logistic regression models.

A retrospective single-center study was conducted on children with spastic CP who had undergone SDR. Two outcomes were defined, one representing children not improving in motor function and spasticity and one representing children improving in motor function two years after surgery. Baseline variables were chosen based on established regressors and clinical considerations and tested for being predictors using multivariate logistic regression.

We included 96 patients (mean age [SD] 6y 9 m [2y 5 m], range 2y to 17y) in the study. Significant predictors of non-improvement in motor function and spasticity two years after SDR were higher age at surgery and higher preoperative Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) score. Significant predictors of motor function improvement after SDR were lower preoperative Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) scores, higher preoperative passive range of motion (pROM) and lower age at surgery.

For the first time, pROM and preoperative spasticity were identified as predictors of SDR outcome. We confirmed motor function and age as predictors. These variables will be useful for future patient selection. Adjusting for the GMFM-88's ceiling effect, children with higher motor function can still profit significantly from SDR.

This study investigated the effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) on dystonia and dystonic posture in patients with cerebral palsy (CP) presenting with mixed spasticity and dystonia.

A prospective, single-centre study was conducted at a UK supra-regional centre from May 2013 to September 2022. All children with spasticity, dystonia and/or dystonic posture undergoing SDR were included. The primary outcome measure was pre- and postoperative assessment of dystonic posture. Dystonia severity was measured using the Barry-Albright dystonia (BAD) scale.

Two hundred and fifty-seven patients (aged 3-18 years) underwent SDR. Forty-three patients had dystonia and 52 exhibited dystonic posture without dystonia. At 3-month follow-up (n = 29), GMFCS levels tended to decrease, returning to baseline at 6 months (n = 25). Two patients required medication adjustments post-surgery. Dystonia levels remained unchanged in the dystonia group. In the dystonic posture group, 33 patients showed no change, while 21 improved.

SDR may be beneficial for carefully selected patients with dystonia or dystonic posture, without worsening these conditions. Optimal patient selection, clear communication of surgical goals and multidisciplinary involvement are crucial.

To identify the short-term effects of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) on gait and clinical impairments in children with bilateral spastic cerebral palsy (CP) and subgroups based on baseline gait patterns.

Eighty-nine children with bilateral spastic CP (55 males, mean age [SD] before SDR: 9 years 5 months [2 years 3 months]; Gross Motor Function Classification System level I: 18; II: 54; III: 17) received three-dimensional gait analyses at two time points (baseline and 1 year after SDR); their baseline gait patterns were classified. The analysis included the comparisons of (1) sagittal plane kinematic waveforms, the Gait Profile Score, and non-dimensional spatiotemporal parameters between the two time points, (2) the kinematic waveforms of both time points to those of typically developing children, and (3) composite impairment scores of spasticity, weakness, and selectivity between the two time points.

Overall, kinematics improved distally but deteriorated proximally in the entire sample, especially in genu recurvatum and crouch gait patterns. Jump gait showed the most improvements after SDR, followed by apparent equinus and crouch gait. Spasticity was reduced after SDR, but not at the expense of strength or selectivity.

The potential merit of investigating short-term SDR effects on gait according to baseline gait patterns was shown, with an overview of changes after SDR that may facilitate patient-tailored treatment.

To investigate the effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) on an integrated outcome set 1-year post-SDR, in a cohort of children with spastic cerebral palsy (CP).

Fifteen children with bilateral spastic CP (median age 8 years 8 months [interquartile range 3 years 3 months], 11 males, four females, eight in Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level II, seven in GMFCS level III) were measured pre- and 1-year post-SDR. Clinical scales and goniometry assessed plantar flexor spasticity, range of motion, strength, and selectivity. Spasticity was also quantified via an instrumented assessment. Medial gastrocnemius macroscopic muscle morphology (absolute and normalized muscle belly, tendon and muscle-tendon unit length, cross-sectional area, muscle volume) was assessed using ultrasound. Gait profile score, ankle and knee gait variable scores, walking speed, cadence, and step length were extracted from gait analysis. Gross motor function was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 item set. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse pre- and post-SDR changes. A reference database was used to qualitatively judge muscle growth post-SDR with respect to muscle growth of children with spastic CP without SDR intervention.

Significant changes (p < 0.05) were seen for spasticity, selectivity, all absolute morphology parameters, normalized tendon and muscle-tendon unit length, and all gait parameters, except walking speed and cadence. Muscle growth of children with and without SDR was comparable.

SDR is an effective spasticity reducing treatment and does not adversely affect natural muscle growth in spastic CP.

Spasticity is a potentially debilitating symptom of various acquired and congenital neurologic pathologies that, without adequate treatment, may lead to long-term disability, compromise functional independence, and negatively impact mental health. Several conservative as well as non-nerve targeted surgical strategies have been developed for the treatment of spasticity, but these may be associated with significant drawbacks, such as adverse side effects to medication, device dependence on intrathecal baclofen pumps, and inadequate relief with tendon-based procedures. In these circumstances, patients may benefit from nerve-targeted surgical interventions such as (i) selective dorsal rhizotomy, (ii) hyperselective neurectomy, and (iii) nerve transfer. When selecting the appropriate surgical approach, preoperative patient characteristics, as well as the risks and benefits of nerve-targeted surgical intervention, must be carefully evaluated. Here, we review the current evidence on the efficacy of these nerve-targeted surgical approaches for treating spasticity across various congenital and acquired neurologic pathologies.

This research was aimed at comparing the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with interrupted serial casting (SC) versus SC alone on various aspects of lower limb function in children with diplegic cerebral palsy. SC is a clinical technique used to increase passive range of motion (ROM), decrease hypertonicity, and improve walking in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

This randomized comparative trial involved 33 children with diplegic CP, who were randomly assigned to group A or group B at recruitment. Group A received SC along with a customized physical therapy program, whereas group B received the same interventions as group A along with NMES applied through cast windows during casting. Evaluations were based on ROM, the Modified Tardieu Scale, handheld dynamometer measurements, and the Observational Gait Scale. Assessments were conducted before and after 8 weeks of intervention.

Both groups exhibited significant improvements in dorsiflexion ROM, popliteal angle, gastrocnemius dynamic spasticity, and hamstring dynamic spasticity after the intervention (P = 0.0001 for all). However, significant differences (P < 0.05) in dorsiflexor strength, knee extensor strength, and observational gait scale score were observed between groups after the intervention, favoring group B.

The use of NMES during SC may help overcome the substantial decrease in strength resulting from casting, thus achieving less reduction of tone, improving ROM without significantly decreasing strength, and attaining greater improvements in gait function.

Single-level selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) surgery requires an intra-operative level check to identify the L1 vertebral level or the conus medullaris. Typically, this requires a pre-operative or intra-operative x-ray. We present our experience using initial transcutaneous ultrasound as an alternative to x-ray level check.

A prospective SDR database was used to identify patients. The operation notes were reviewed to identify the level check method and any complications or wrong-level surgery.

Data are reported for the first 160 SDR surgeries performed within our centre, mean age 6.47 years (range 2.5-19 years). The first 11 patients had combined x-ray and transcutaneous ultrasound for pre-incision level check. This allowed the neurosurgeon to assess the accuracy and feasibility of using transcutaneous ultrasound instead of x-ray. The subsequent 149 patients had ultrasound alone for transcutaneous pre-incision level check. An intra-operative ultrasound level check was performed for all patients following skin incision and dissection down to the spinal lamina. In this way, the conus level was confirmed before dural opening. For all patients at all ages, the combination of initial transcutaneous ultrasound followed by intra-operative ultrasound allowed accurate identification of the conus. There were no instances of wrong-level surgery. Learning points are presented within this paper.

Combined use of transcutaneous ultrasound followed by intra-operative ultrasound can allow accurate identification of the conus, saving radiation exposure and potentially improving theatre efficiency. Appropriate training and experience are required for any neurosurgeon using these techniques.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) can improve the spastic gait of carefully selected patients with cerebral palsy. Spinal arachnoid cysts are a rare pathology that can also cause spastic gait secondary to spinal cord compression.

The authors present an interesting case of a child with cerebral palsy and spastic diplegia. He was evaluated by a multidisciplinary team and determined to be a good candidate for SDR. Preoperative evaluation included magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine, which identified an arachnoid cyst causing spinal cord compression. The cyst was surgically fenestrated, which provided some gait improvement. After recovering from cyst fenestration surgery, the patient underwent SDR providing further gait improvement.

SDR can be beneficial for some patients with spastic diplegia. Most guidelines do not include spinal MRI in the preoperative evaluation for SDR. However, spinal MRI can be beneficial for surgical planning by localizing the level of the conus. It may also identify additional spinal pathology that is contributing to the patient's spasticity. In rare cases, such as this one, patients may benefit from staged surgery to address structural causes of spastic gait prior to proceeding with SDR.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) reduces lower limb spasticity, improves gait patterns, and restores normal physical and social activity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Single-level laminectomy (SLL) and multiple-level laminotomy (MLL) are 2 surgical approaches for SDR with limited clinical data comparing their postoperative outcomes.

To compare the differences in multidimensional outcomes after SDR between SLL and MLL for children with spastic cerebral palsy.

We retrospectively reviewed children who underwent SDR in our hospital from 1997 to 2016. The multidimensional outcomes in spasticity, joint range of motions, gait kinetics, gross motor activities, functional outcomes, and urological outcomes were assessed 1 year postoperatively. Hip dysplasia and scoliosis rate were compared as long-term outcomes.

Sixty children underwent SDR, including 34 SLL patients and 26 MLL patients. Most improvements in multidimensional outcomes were comparable between SLL and MLL. Patients in the SLL group had larger improvements in ankle dorsiflexion in the midstance phase (SLL 7.59° ± 11.48° vs MLL 0.29° ± 11.30°, P = .027). The rate of scoliosis was similar between the 2 surgical approaches (SLL 12.1% vs MLL 15.4%, P = .722).

SDR for children with spastic cerebral palsy could provide physical, functional, and urological improvements. SLL achieved a higher degree of improvement in ankle dorsiflexion in the midstance phase. The rate of scoliosis was not significantly increased by multiple-level laminotomy.

Spinal neuromodulation and activity-based rehabilitation triggers neural network reorganization and enhances sensory-motor performances involving the lower limbs, the trunk, and the upper limbs. This study reports the acute effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Spinal Cord Neuromodulation (SCONE™, SpineX Inc.) on 12 individuals (ages 2 to 50) diagnosed with cerebral palsy (CP) with Gross Motor Function Classification Scale (GMFCS) levels ranging from I to V. Acute spinal neuromodulation improved the postural and locomotor abilities in 11 out of the 12 patients including the ability to generate bilateral weight bearing stepping in a 2-year-old (GMFCS level IV) who was unable to step. In addition, we observed independent head-control and weight bearing standing with stimulation in a 10-year-old and a 4-year old (GMFCS level V) who were unable to hold their head up or stand without support in the absence of stimulation. All patients significantly improved in coordination of flexor and extensor motor pools and inter and intralimb joint angles while stepping on a treadmill. While it is assumed that the etiologies of the disruptive functions of CP are associated with an injury to the supraspinal networks, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that spinal neuromodulation and functionally focused activity-based therapies can form a functionally improved chronic state of reorganization of the spinal-supraspinal connectivity. We further suggest that the level of reorganization of spinal-supraspinal connectivity with neuromodulation contributed to improved locomotion by improving the coordination patterns of flexor and extensor muscles by modulating the amplitude and firing patterns of EMG burst during stepping.

Investigate the effect of age category (1-9 years vs 10-18 years), sex, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and presence of dystonia on changes in eight function test parameters 24 months after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR).

Prospective, single-center study of all children aged 3-18 years with bilateral cerebral palsy with spasticity who underwent SDR at a tertiary pediatric neurosurgery center between 2012 and 2019. A linear mixed effects model was used to assess longitudinal changes.

From 2012 to 2019, 42 children had follow-up available at 24 months. Mean GMFM-66 scores increased after SDR (mean difference 5.1 units: 95% CI 3.05-7.13, p < 0.001). Statistically significant improvements were observed in CPQoL, PEDI Self-care and Mobility, 6MWT, Gillette, and MAS scores. There was no significant difference in the improvements seen for age category, sex, GMFCS level, and presence of dystonia for most of the parameters tested (5/8, 6/8, 5/8, and 6/8 respectively).

SDR may improve gross and fine motor function, mobility and self-care, quality of life, and overall outcome based on extensive scoring parameter testing at 24 months. Atypical patient populations may benefit from SDR if appropriately selected. Multi-center, prospective registries investigating the effect of SDR are required.

This review looks at the advances in the surgical technique, selective dorsal rhizotomy, used for the management of spasticity in children.

Spasticity is the result of an exaggeration of the monosynaptic muscle stretch reflex due to lesions affecting the central nervous system, in particular an upper motor neuron lesion. Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical technique developed to treat spastic diplegia, one of the common forms of cerebral palsy, resulting from the lack of supraspinal inhibitory controls. The aim of SDR is to identify and cut a critical amount of the sensory rootlets, in particular those contributing the most to spasticity, in order to relieve the patient from lower limb spasticity while preserving motor strength and sphincter control. Various surgical techniques to perform SDR have been proposed over time. Similarly, intraoperative neurophysiology (ION)-first introduced by Fasano and colleagues in 1976-is a safe and effective tool to guide the surgeon in the procedure of SDR, but different ION strategies are used by different authors, and the value of ION itself has been questioned.

The purpose of this paper is to review the anatomo-physiological background of SDR, the historical development of the surgical technique, and the essential principles of ION.

While some surgeons privilege a single-level approach and others a multi-level approach, nowadays, there are still neither agreement nor guidelines on the percentage of roots to be cut. Rather, a tailored approach based on both the preoperative functional status as well as intraoperative ION findings seems reasonable. ION is considered not essential to decide the percentage of roots to cut, but it assists to distinguish between ventral and dorsal roots, and to preserve sphincterial function, whenever S2 rootlets are included in SDR.

To optimize the balance between reduction of spasticity and preservation of motor strength while minimizing the neurological damage remains the main goal of SDR.

Objective Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is most commonly applied in the context of the treatment of the spastic diplegic variant of cerebral palsy (CP). Its role in the treatment of spasticity associated with other conditions is not well-established. We sought to review outcomes following SDR for the treatment of functionally limiting spasticity in the setting of a genetic etiology. Methods A systematic literature review was performed using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed based on the PRISMA guidelines. Articles were included if they described the application of SDR for spasticity of genetic etiology. Reported outcomes pertaining to spasticity and gross motor function following SDR were summarized. Results Five articles reporting on 16 patients (10 males, 6 females) met the inclusion criteria, of which four reported on SDR for hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP) and four on syndromic patients or other inherited diseases, with an overall follow-up ranging from 11 to 252 months. These individuals were found to have several genetic mutations including ALS2, SPG4, and SPG3A. The mean age at the time of surgery was 14.9 years (median 10 years, range 3-37 years). Conclusions Although all patients experienced a reduction in spasticity, the long-term gross motor functional outcomes objectively assessed at last follow-up were heterogeneous. There may be a role for SDR in the context of static genetic disorders causing spasticity. Further evidence is required prior to the widespread adoption of SDR for such disorders as, based on the collective observations of this review, spasticity is consistently reduced but the long-term effect on gross motor function remains unclear.

This article overviews the surgical options for hypertonia management in cerebral palsy, both spasticity and dystonia. We review the history and use of intrathecal baclofen. We contrast its use with the indications for selective dorsal rhizotomy and review how it is the optimal technique to lower tone in the ambulatory spastic diplegic patient with cerebral palsy. This article reviews the advent of deep brain stimulation, with an emphasis on selection criteria and expected outcomes in this population. The article reviews the principles and use of selective peripheral neurotomy as it is applied to focal spasticity not requiring systemic tone reduction.

Spasticity affects a large number of children, mainly in the setting of cerebral palsy, however, only a few paediatric neurosurgeons deal with this problem. This is mainly due to the fact that until 1979, when Fasano has published the first series of selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR), neurosurgeons were able to provide such children only a modest help. The therapy of spasticity has made a great progress since then. Today, peroral drugs, intramuscular and intrathecal medicines are available, that may limit the effects of the disease. In addition, surgical treatment is gaining importance, appearing in the form of deep brain stimulation, peripheral nerve procedures and SDR. All these options offer the affected children good opportunities of improving the quality of life.

A 15-year old boy is presented that was surgically treated for spasticity as a result of cerebral palsy. Laminotomy at L1 level was performed and L1 to S1 nerve roots were isolated and divided in smaller fascicles. Then, the SDR was made.

We describe a patient report and surgical technique of SDR that was performed in Slovenia for the first time.

Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a neurosurgical intervention intended to permanently reduce spasticity in the lower limbs and improve mobility in selected children with cerebral palsy (CP). Despite SDR having been performed worldwide for the past 30 years, there is moderate quality of evidence that SDR is effective in reducing spasticity with low to very low evidence of its effectiveness in improving gait, function and participation, using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system. Published studies have described outcomes for groups that differ in selection, surgical technique and postoperative rehabilitation making it difficult for clinicians to use this information to advise families on best management. There is substantial community interest in SDR. A small number of children with CP undergo SDR in Australia each year and some families seek the intervention at international sites. Capturing clinical outcomes and adverse event (AE) data for Australian children undergoing SDR will provide clinicians with information to help guide families considering SDR.

The Australian SDR Research Registry is a national registry of multidimensional outcomes for Australian children undergoing SDR in an Australian or overseas centre. Data will be collected for up to 10 years following the surgery, to include surgery and admission details, surgical and long-term AEs, and outcome measures across the body structure and functions, activity and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Data will be collected at baseline, during inpatient admission and at 1, 2, 5 and 10 years post. The aim of collecting these data is to improve understanding of short-, medium- and long-term outcomes and adverse effects of the intervention.

This study was approved by the individual Human Research and Ethics committees at the five Australian tertiary hospitals involved. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

ACTRN12618000985280; Pre-results.

This study aimed to investigate the value of real-time shear wave elastography (SWE) in the assessment of torsional cervical dystonia (TCD).

Ninety healthy volunteers and 30 TCD patients were recruited, and elastography was performed at musculi sternocleidomastoideus (MSD) and musculi splenius capitis (MSC). Mean shear elastic modulus of right MSD and MSC in healthy controls and bilateral MSD and MSC in TCD patients was determined. The thickness of MSD and MSC of affected muscles was measured in TCD patients.

In TCD patients, the mean shear elastic modulus of affected MSD and MSC was significantly higher than that of corresponding normal muscles (P<0.01) and that of controls (P<0.01). The diagnostic threshold was 24.9 kPa for MSD and 25.07 kPa for MSC (for MSD and MSC, the area under ROC was 0.979 and 0.979, with a sensitivity of 90% and 91.3%, and a specificity of 95.6% and 96.7%, respectively). The elastic modulus of neither affected nor normal MSD and MSC was significantly related to age and body mass index (P>0.05). The shear elastic modulus of affected MSD and MSC was positively related to the peak electromyography (r=0.83-0.73, P<0.01). The thickness of affected MSD and MSC was significantly thicker than that of corresponding normal muscles in TCD patients (P<0.01).

Real-time SWE can identify the difference in shear elastic modulus of MSD and MSC between the affected and normal side in TCD patients, indicating important diagnostic value in the assessment of muscular status for these patients.