Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a substantial global health challenge, ranking as the third most commonly diagnosed and second most fatal cancer worldwide. With an increasing incidence, particularly in older populations, CRC demands innovative therapeutic approaches to address the limitations of existing treatments. One critical target in CRC is the KRAS gene, which is frequently mutated and implicated in various cancer-related processes. This narrative review explores the promising role of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab combination therapy in CRC treatment. Combining Sotorasib with Panitumumab, an EGFR antagonist, offers a synergistic approach to comprehensively block KRAS and EGFR pathways, potentially overcoming resistance mechanisms observed in monotherapies. The review discusses the evolution of CRC treatment from traditional chemotherapy to the advent of targeted therapies like Bevacizumab and Cetuximab. It highlights the limitations of existing therapies, including resistance and toxicities, emphasising the urgency for innovative approaches. The CodeBreak clinical trials, specifically CodeBreak 101 and CodeBreak 300, provide a focal point for evaluating the efficacy of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in patients with refractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Preliminary results demonstrate significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates, suggesting a paradigm shift in CRC treatment. The preliminary findings from the CodeBreak 300 trial signify a transformative impact of Sotorasib plus Panitumumab in refractory KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. With a notable increase in PFS and objective response rates and a well-tolerated safety profile, this combination therapy emerges as a potential new standard of care. The results present an optimistic outlook for patients resistant to conventional therapies.

Bevacizumab combined with FOLFOX improves outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but comprehensive safety evaluations remain limited.

We analyzed adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), comparing FOLFOX monotherapy (366 reports), combination therapy (517 reports), and bevacizumab monotherapy (1,604 reports). Disproportionality analysis using ROR, PRR, BCPNN, and EBGM identified significant ADRs.

Twenty-one ADRs were significantly associated with FOLFOX-bevacizumab combination therapy, predominantly infections (e.g. febrile infection) and gastrointestinal disorders (e.g. anastomotic leak, ulcerative gastritis). The combination exhibited comparable but fewer ADRs than monotherapies, excluding pneumothorax and hypertension. Certain ADRs showed higher incidence and shorter median onset time (3 days post-treatment).

Combination therapy demonstrates manageable safety with early monitoring, though stricter criteria for ADR detection may overlook rare events. Key risks align with monotherapy profiles, emphasizing vigilance for infection-related and gastrointestinal complications. Further studies are warranted to validate these pharmacovigilance findings.

Backgrounds and ObjectivesColorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality both globally and in our country. In Turkey, we conducted a multicenter investigation into the effectiveness of second-line treatments and real-life data for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (NCT04757311).Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, records from 28 centers were collected, and histopathological, molecular, and clinical characteristics were documented. Patients were categorized into groups based on their second-line biological treatments: anti-EGFR (Group A and Group B, panitumumab and cetuximab) and anti-VEGF (Group C, bevacizumab and aflibercept). They were then compared within these groups.ResultsA total of 588 patients with documented RAS wild-type status were evaluated. The median OS was 15.7, 14.3 and 14.7 months in Group A, Group B and Group C, respectively (p  =  0.764). The median PFS of the patients in second-line setting that received panitumumab, cetuximab and bevacizumab/aflibercept were 7.8, 6.6 and 7.4 months, respectively (p  =  0.848).ConclusionAccording to the results of our real-life data study, there is no significant difference in efficiency between the combination of biological agent and chemotherapy used in the second-line treatments.

The "angiogenesis switch"-defined as the active process by which solid tumors develop their own circulation-plays an important role in both tumoral growth and propagation. As the malignant tumor grows and reaches a critical size, the metabolic needs as a function of an ever-increasing distance to the nearest emergent blood vessel, can no longer be covered by the microenvironment of the peritumoral tissue. Although a relatively discrete process, the "angiogenic switch" acts as a limiting stage of tumoral development present from the avascular hyperplasia phase to the vascularized neoplastic phase, providing support for tumor expansion and metastasis. Over time, research has focused on blocking the angiogenetic pathways (such as VEGF/VEGFR signaling axis) leading to the development of targeted therapeutic agents such as Bevacizumab. Objectives: We conducted a review of the molecular principles of tumoral angiogenesis and we tried to follow the history of Bevacizumab from its first approval for human usage 20 years ago to current days, focusing on the impact this agent had in solid tumor therapy. A comprehensive review of clinical trials pertaining to Bevacizumab (from the era of the preclinic trials leading to approval for human usage, to the more recent randomized trial focusing on combination targeted therapy) further details the role of this drug. We aimed to establish if this ancient drug continues to have a place in modern oncology. Conclusions: Bevacizumab, one of the first drugs targeting tumoral microenvironment, remains one of the most important oncologic agents blocking the VEGF/VEGFR angiogenic pathway. otherwise, history of 20 years marked by numerous controversies (ranging from methodological errors of clinical trials to withdrawal of approval for human usage in breast cancer patients, from discussions about severe side effects to resistance to therapy and limited efficacity), Bevacizumab continues to provide an optimal therapeutic option for many solid tumors that previously had little to no means of treatment, improving otherwise bleak outcomes. Even in the era of personalized precision oncology, Bevacizumab continues to be a key element in many therapeutic regimens both as monotherapy and in combination with newer targeted agents.

Bevacizumab shows inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability, with an exposure-response relationship in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This study explores whether a double dose of bevacizumab, compared to a standard dose, increases efficacy in mCRC patients treated with bevacizumab-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy and who have a low initial trough concentration of bevacizumab. PHARBEVACOL is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group trial. All patients will receive first-line bi-weekly 5 mg/kg bevacizumab-based chemotherapy and those with low initial bevacizumab concentrations (≤15.5 mg/L) will be randomized to either continue the standard dose (5 mg/kg every 14 days) or receive a double dose (10 mg/kg every 14 days). The primary objective is to evaluate the effect of doubling dose on progression-free survival (PFS). During a screening phase, the first serum trough concentration will be measured on day 14, before the second infusion of bevacizumab. We hypothesize a 40 % PFS in the control group at 9 months versus 60 % in the study group, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.56. With 80 % power, a 5 % two-sided type I error, and a minimum 12-month follow-up, 116 patients need to be included. Since only 50 % of screened patients will be eligible for randomization, approximately 244 patients will be screened. Recruitment is scheduled to begin in February 2025.

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (BEV) is an option for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, there is no consensus on the optimal treatment strategy when disease progresses. The EFFORT open-label, multicenter, single-arm phase II study investigated whether FOLFIRI plus aflibercept retains activity after progression of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV treatment.

The patients with unresectable mCRC who failed first-line FOLFOXIRI plus BEV received FOLFIRI plus aflibercept. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Angiogenic biomarkers were measured before treatment initiation.

From April 2019 to May 2021, 35 patients were enrolled and 34 were analysed in the FAS population (men, 18; median age, 63 years [range: 32-78]). The primary tumor was left-sided in most cases (23/34), 23 patients were RAS mutant, 3 patients had BRAF V600E mutation and 27 patients had liver metastases. The primary end-point was met with a median PFS of 4.3 months [80% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.1]. Median overall survival was 15.2 months [95% CI 8.9-22.7]. Per RECIST, there were 1 complete response, 4 partial responses, 21 stable diseases and 8 disease progressions. Overall response rate was 14.7% [95% CI 5.0-31.1], and disease control rate was 76.5% [95% CI 58.8-89.3]. Responses were more common in patients with high VEGF-C, low VEGF-D and low PlGF levels before treatment.

FOLFIRI plus aflibercept, administered after failure of FOLFOXIRI plus BEV, is effective and has a manageable safety profile. This regimen may be a useful second-line treatment option for these patients.

This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of onvansertib, a polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1) inhibitor, in combination with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + bevacizumab for the second-line treatment of KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

This multicenter, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with KRAS-mutated mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin and fluorouracil with or without bevacizumab. Patients received onvansertib (15 mg/m2 once daily on days 1-5 and 15-19 of a 28-day cycle) and FOLFIRI + bevacizumab (days 1 and 15). The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and tolerability. Translational and preclinical studies were conducted in KRAS-mutant CRC.

Among the 53 patients treated, the confirmed ORR was 26.4% (95% CI, 15.3 to 40.3). The median DOR was 11.7 months (95% CI, 9.4 to not reached). Grade 3/4 adverse events were reported in 62% of patients. A post hoc analysis revealed that patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment had a significantly higher ORR and longer PFS compared with patients with prior bevacizumab treatment: ORR of 76.9% versus 10.0% (odds ratio of 30.0, P < .001) and median PFS of 14.9 months versus 6.6 months (hazard ratio of 0.16, P < .001). Our translational findings support that prior bevacizumab exposure contributes to onvansertib resistance. Preclinically, we showed that onvansertib inhibited the hypoxia pathway and exhibited robust antitumor activity in combination with bevacizumab through the inhibition of angiogenesis.

Onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + bevacizumab showed significant activity in the second-line treatment of patients with KRAS-mutant mCRC, particularly in patients with no prior bevacizumab treatment. These findings led to the evaluation of the combination in the first-line setting (ClinicalTrails.gov identifier: NCT06106308).

DX1002 is an oral vascular-disrupting agent and exhibits promising results in preclinical studies, leading to tumor vasculature destruction and xenografted tumor necrosis in various animal models. In the phase 1 trial, 17 patients with solid tumors receive DX1002 ranging from 50 to 1,100 mg. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose of DX1002 are determined as 600 mg once daily. The most common treatment-related adverse events are nausea (23.5%), vomiting (17.6%), and fatigue (11.8%). All patients are evaluable for anti-tumor response, 12 of which achieve stable disease as best response. One patient with non-small cell lung cancer achieves a stable disease duration of 6.5 months. The median time to progression (TTP) is 2.70 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.90-4.60). Interestingly, reduced blood perfusion is observed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in a patient with colon cancer. In conclusion, DX1002 is well tolerated and exhibits preliminary anti-tumor efficacy in patients with solid tumors. This study was registered at chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2400080298).

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the world, with an average 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 60% [...].

The use of targeted drugs and immunotherapy has significantly impacted the treatment of Colorectal Cancer. However, horizontal comparison among various regimens is extremely rare. Therefore, we evaluated the survival efficacy of multiple treatment regimens of targeted therapy and/or immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in patients with Colorectal Cancer.

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases, covering the period from the establishment of the databases to October 29, 2024. To obtain articles that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and contained the required data for conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). The NMA evaluated overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

A total of 90 studies were identified, comprising a sample size of 33,167 subjects. In terms of PFS, compared with simple chemotherapy strategies, most of the other single or combined strategies are significantly effective, among which targeted therapy strategies have more advantages. Encorafenib + Binimetinib + Cetuximab (ENC-BIN-CET) shows significant benefits in all comparisons except when compared with Chemotherapy + Cetuximab + Dalotuzumab (Chemo-CET-DAL), Encorafenib + Cetuximab (ENC-CET), and Panitumumab + Sotorasib (PAN-SOT). The ENC-CET and PAN-SOT targeted strategies also show significant benefits. Pembrolizumab (PEM) monotherapy has advantages over all others except when it is not superior to some targeted strategies. Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab + Atezolizumab is only inferior to some strategies. In terms of OS, the combinations of Chemotherapy + Bevacizumab, ENC-CET, Chemotherapy + Panitumumab, and ENC-BIN-CET are superior to simple chemotherapy regimens. ENC-BIN-CET shows OS benefits in all comparisons except some. ENC-CET significantly improves OS in most cases, and PEM also significantly improves OS in some regimens. In the probability ranking of OS and PFS, ENC-BIN-CET has the best effect, followed by ENC-CET.

In conclusion, pembrolizumab is still effective in prolonging survival. Dual- and triple-drug targeted strategies are the best in terms of OS and PFS, and the combination of targeted immunotherapy and chemotherapy also works. However, not all combinations are beneficial. As targeted drugs play an active role, specific drugs for colorectal cancer regimens should be carefully selected.

Antiangiogenic drugs may cause vascular normalization and correct hypoxia in tumors, shifting cells to mitochondrial respiration as the primary source of energy. In turn, the addition of an inhibitor of mitochondrial respiration to antiangiogenic therapy holds potential to induce synthetic lethality. This study evaluated the mitochondrial inhibitor ME-344 in combination with bevacizumab in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Patients were eligible if they had disease progression after standard therapies, adequate hematologic, hepatic and renal function, and no contraindications to bevacizumab. ME-344 was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 and bevacizumab on days 1 and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerance. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at week 16. In the 23 patients enrolled, the median age was 58 years, median number of prior lines of therapy was 4, and median interval from last therapy was 3 months. The most common adverse events (all grades/grade ≥ 3) were fatigue (48%/13%), abdominal pain (35%/4%), diarrhea (30%/4%) and constipation (30%/0%). No patient had an objective response; 9 patients (39%) achieved stable disease. The 16-week PFS was 30.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2-51.3), the median PFS was 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.6-4.7), and the median overall survival was 6.7 months (95% CI: 3.4-not reached). ME-344 plus bevacizumab was well tolerated. Disease control was limited in this heavily pretreated patient population. Additional investigations in earlier lines are indicated, and extended-release ME-344 formulations may provide longer drug exposure to maximize benefit. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05824559. Registration date 22 March 2022).

Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (GEA) is a rare malignant tumor that is not associated with high-risk HPV infection, known for its high invasiveness and resistance to current treatments. This study assessed the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic regimens in real-world GEA patients.

Patients with GEA were enrolled between February 2012 and March 2023, and their clinicopathological characteristics were collected from their medical records. The patients were categorized into groups based on whether they received anti-angiogenic treatments or not. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

A total of 43 GEA patients were enrolled in this study, with 23 cases who received anti-angiogenic drugs (nine received them as the primary treatment, 12 as first-line therapy after recurrence/metastasis, and two as second-line therapy) as the observation group. The other 20 patients who received similar treatments without the anti-angiogenic regimens serve as the control group. Compared to the control group, the addition of anti-angiogenic drugs as the primary treatment mildly extended progression-free survival (PFS) while not being statistically significant (16 months vs 11 months, p = 0.744). The negative results were also observed in 12 patients who started anti-angiogenic therapy as first-line therapy after recurrence/metastasis (8.5 months vs 9 months, p = 0.518). As for the overall survival (OS), no benefits were detected in either patients who started the anti-angiogenic therapy as primary or subsequent treatments (p = 0.499 and 0.450, respectively).

We firstly evaluated the efficacy of anti-angiogenic drugs in treating patients with GEA. Although with a small sample size, our preliminary results clearly proposed that the anti-angiogenic therapy failed in suppressing tumors and should not be a preferred choice for GEA. As a much rarer tumor without standard treatments, we herein warned of a pitfall for gynecologic oncologists when facing this malignancy.

The prolongation of survival along with the preservation of quality of life, possibly avoiding harmful cumulative toxicities, is the primary therapeutic aim for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the third-line setting. Several therapeutic options are now available, although some differences across countries in drug approval and the optimal therapeutic sequencing associated with each peculiar patient subgroup represent a clinical challenge for oncologists. Among various options, the SUNLIGHT trial showed how the combination of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) with bevacizumab is effective with an easily manageable toxicity profile compared to FTD/TPI alone. Of note, the efficacy is confirmed independently from KRAS mutational status and also for patients who had breaks in anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy. Herein, we describe the current state of the art in the landscape of treatments after the second progression in mCRC. Based on a critical review of the literature aimed to guide clinicians in their daily decision-making, we point out that the combination of FTD/TPI with bevacizumab produces a clinical benefit in unselected mCRC patients. Therefore, the FTD/TPI plus bevacizumab regimen can represent a new standard of care for the treatment of patients with refractory mCRC who have progressed after two lines of therapy.

Both aflibercept and bevacizumab-based regimens are available II-line treatment options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no head-to-head trials established the optimal anti-angiogenic strategy for this setting.

We launched a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to assess and compare clinical efficacy of II-line treatments for patients with mCRC. Patients with KRAS/NRAS/BRAF-wild type and KRAS/NRAS mutant tumors were also analyzed separately.

348 patients were included, of whom 153 and 195 were treated with bevacizumab- and aflibercept-based regimens, respectively. Patients treated with aflibercept showed an increased risk of death (corrected [co]-HR 1.92, 95 %CI: 1.37-2.68), of disease progression/death (co-HR 1.43, 95 %CI: 1.12-1.82) and a decreased objective response rate (ORR) (21.5 % vs 34.7 %, p=0.007) in comparison to bevacizumab. Patients treated with II-line bevacizumab were more frequently treated in the third line setting after disease progression (91.1 % vs 68.5 %, p<0.0001). In the KRAS/NRAS mutant cohort, treatment with bevacizumab was associated with longer overall survival (OS) (18.0 months vs 12.5 months, p=0.0069), but similar progression free survival (PFS) (p=0.32) and ORR (p=0.57). In the KRAS/NRAS, BRAF wild type cohort, patients treated with bevacizumab achieved longer OS (20.2 months vs 10.6 months, p=0.013), PFS (8.4 months vs 3.7 months, p=0.0002), and higher ORR (48.6 % vs 15.0 %, p=0.0016), compared to those treated with aflibercept. The results were independently confirmed with inverse probability of treatment weighting and with fixed multivariable Cox-regressions.

These findings support the use of bevacizumab-based over aflibercept-based regimens as II-line treatment in mCRC, especially in KRAS/NRAS and BRAF wild type tumors.

FOLFIRI (5-FU + leucovorin + irinotecan) plus ramucirumab is one of the standards in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients progressing after treatment with oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine with bevacizumab, but there is no evidence on its efficacy without prior bevacizumab. Moreover, VEGF-D has not been confirmed as a predictive biomarker for ramucirumab's efficacy, either.

The RAINCLOUD study was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial conducted in Japan. Patients with recurrent CRC pretreated with fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin without bevacizumab were analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints measured were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety.

A total of 48 patients were enrolled from 15 sites between September 2017 and September 2020. Their median age was 63.5 years (25~77), 20.1% had a right-sided tumor, and 68.8% had RAS-mutant cancer. The median PFS was 8.9 months (90% CI: 6.3-11.8), so the primary endpoint was met. Their median OS and ORR were 22.3 months (95% CI: 17.4-NA) and 41.7% (95% CI: 4.9-7.6), respectively. An incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events that reached over 5% applied to neutropenia (44%), leucopenia (10%), and hypertension (8%). In the biomarker analysis, the serum VEGF-D levels post-treatment were higher than those pre-treatment, but the PFS in those with high VEGF-D levels trended towards being worse than that in those with low VEGF-D (7.6M/5.6M (p = 0.095; HR: 0.56)). Instead, those with low TSP-2 had a better PFS than those with high TSP-2 (7.5M/4.3M (p = 0.022; HR: 0.45)).

Our data suggested that FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab was effective and tolerable for CRC refractory to fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin without anti-angiogenesis. Serum VEGF-D levels may not be predictive but TSP-2 may be a potential prognostic biomarker for ramucirumab's efficacy.

The optimal second-line systemic treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is inconclusive.

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library for RCTs comparing second-line systemic treatments for mCRC from the inception of each database up to February 3, 2024. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique was used in this network meta-analysis (NMA) to generate the direct and indirect comparison results among multiple treatments in progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response (CR), partial response (PR), grade 3 and above adverse events (Grade ≥ 3AE), and any adverse events (Any AE). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was adopted to evaluate the probability of each treatment being the optimum intervention. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the RAS gene status.

A total of 47 randomized controlled trials were included, involving 16,925 patients and 44 second-line systemic treatments. In improving OS, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab + Erlotinib exhibited significant superiority (SUCRA:92.7%). In improving PFS, Irinotecan + CMAB009 (SUCRA:86.4%) had advantages over other treatments. FOLFIRI + Trebananib (SUCRA:88.1%) had a significant advantage in improving ORR. Among multiple second-line treatments, the SUCRA values of FOLFOX + Bevacizumab in PFS, OS, ORR, and PR were 83.4%, 74.0%, 81.1%, and 86.1%, respectively, and the safety was not significantly different from other interventions. Subgroup analyses showed that FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + panitumumab ranked among the top in survival outcomes in the RAS-mutant population (OS SUCRA: 87.9%; PFS SUCRA: 70.2%); whereas in the RAS-wild-type population, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab significantly improved survival outcomes (OS SUCRA: 73.2%; PFS SUCRA: 65.1%).

For most people, FOLFOX + Bevacizumab may be the best second-line systemic treatment regimen for mCRC. For RAS-mutant populations, FOLFIRI + Bevacizumab + Panitumumab is recommended. However, the therapeutic effect may be affected by the patient's physiological state, and clinicians should apply it based on actual conditions.

To evaluate R0/R1 resection rate in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) treated with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen in daily clinical practice.

This French, multicentre, prospective, observational cohort (NCT05178745) included patients with CLM (alone or predominant; up to 5 lung nodules <2 cm allowed) initiating aflibercept plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks per physician choice. Primary endpoint was R0/R1 resection rate. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), radiological and pathological responses, and safety.

A total of 137 patients (median age 65 years, RAS/BRAF mutant 57 %/9 %) were enrolled at 22 French sites. CLM (median 4) were synchronous in 82 %, bilobar in 71 % and located in liver only in 54 %. Overall, 17 % of patients had R0/R1 resection (21 % for patients with liver-only disease). A major pathological response per Blazer score was observed in 55 % of resected patients, along with significantly longer OS (median 34.8 vs 9.1 months, p < 0.0001) and PFS (median 11.4 vs 4.9 months, p < 0.0001) compared to non-resected patients. Post-operative complications occurred in 17 % of patients (all Dindo-Clavien grade I-II) and there was no post-operative deaths. Overall, 34 % had grade ≥ 3 adverse events, mainly general health deterioration and diarrhea.

Results suggest that aflibercept plus FOLFIRI, after failure of a prior oxaliplatin-based regimen, allows R0/R1 resection of CLM in almost 20 % of patients with a major pathological response in most cases and a median OS prolonged by more than 3-fold versus non-resected patients.

This paper investigates the dynamics of a three-dimensional nonlinear cancer model involving interactions among cancer cells, normal cells, and immune cells. By performing a linear stability analysis of the equilibria and investigating the Hopf bifurcation in relation to the immune cell growth rate, we reveal the possibility of chaotic behavior when radiation is absent. However, with the appropriate implementation of radiotherapy, the cancer model demonstrates stable solutions, transitioning from chaotic oscillations through period-halving bifurcation. Additionally, we propose and examine an indirect Z-control mechanism within the cancer model. Our findings indicate that using the indirect Z-controller on the immune population successfully manages chaos and adjusts the cancer cell density to a desired level. Through extensive investigation, we demonstrate the robustness of the Z-controller in managing oscillations and provide insights into determining the minimum number of immune cells needed to achieve a predetermined cancer cell density. This study underscores the importance of control mechanisms in mitigating cancer progression and highlights the potential of Z-control for therapeutic intervention strategies.

Metastatic colorectal cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death across the world. The treatment paradigm has shifted away from systemic chemotherapy alone to include targeted therapy and immunotherapy. The past two decades have been characterized by increased investigation into molecular profiling of colorectal cancer. These molecular profiles help physicians to better understand colorectal cancer biology among patients with metastatic disease. Additionally, improved data on genetic pathways allow for specific therapies to be targeted at the underlying molecular profile. Investigation of the EGFR, VEGF, HER2, and other pathways, as well as deficient mismatch repair, has led to the development of multiple targeted therapies that are now utilized in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for colon and rectal cancer. While these new therapies have contributed to improved survival for metastatic colorectal cancer, long-term survival remains poor. Additional investigation to understand resistance to targeted therapy and development of new targeted therapy is necessary. New therapies are under development and are being tested in the preclinical and clinical settings. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive evaluation of molecular profiling, currently available therapies, and ongoing obstacles in the field of colorectal cancer.

As angiogenesis was recognized as a core hallmark of cancer growth and survival, several strategies have been implemented to target the tumour vasculature. Yet to date, attempts have rarely been so diverse, ranging from vessel growth inhibition and destruction to vessel normalization, reprogramming and vessel growth promotion. Some of these strategies, combined with standard of care, have translated into improved cancer therapies, but their successes are constrained to certain cancer types. This Review provides an overview of these vascular targeting approaches and puts them into context based on our subsequent improved understanding of the tumour vasculature as an integral part of the tumour microenvironment with which it is functionally interlinked. This new knowledge has already led to dual targeting of the vascular and immune cell compartments and sets the scene for future investigations of possible alternative approaches that consider the vascular link with other tumour microenvironment components for improved cancer therapy.

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most frequently diagnosed cancer globally, with a high incidence of morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis of CRC is crucial for determining appropriate treatment regimens, thereby prolonging overall survival rates and improving prognostic outcomes. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the expression profiles of specific proteins in the lymph nodes (LNs) of CRC patients, including integrin-linked kinase (ILK), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), and ephrin type-A receptor 2 (EphA2), through immunohistochemical studies. Methods The study involved a sample of 76 patients clinically diagnosed with CRC who were referred by their specialist oncologist. Tumor staging was determined based on the TNM classification. Immunohistochemical studies were conducted to measure the expression patterns of the candidate markers (ILK, EphA2, and VEGFA). Expression levels were scored as negative, low, or high. Results The highest percentage of CRC patients were diagnosed with conventional adenocarcinoma, predominantly in stages II and III. Of the 76 CRC tissue specimens, the majority (46, 60.52%) tested negative for lymphatic invasion, while the remaining 30 (39.47%) tested positive. According to the TNM classification, 14 samples had N1 (one invaded LN), and 16 had N2 (two or more invaded LNs). Furthermore, the percentage of patients with low and high EphA2 expression was significantly higher (p<0.0001) compared to the negative expression controls. Regarding ILK, 15 cases (50.0%) showed negative expression, while an equal number displayed positive expression. Additionally, the group with low VEGFA expression was statistically significantly higher (p=0.01) compared to the negative control. Conclusion The expression levels of EphA2, ILK, and VEGFA were found to be higher in LNs with lymphatic invasion compared to those with negative expression, highlighting the role of these proteins in CRC progression.

Metastatic CRC is considered as a heterogenous disease. Its management is therefore complex and dynamic. In order the give a ready reference to community oncologists, we developed this real world recommendations.

A group of experts with academic background and real world experience in mCRC got together. We reviewed the current literature and the insights gained from our real world experience. Based on the same we put together these recommendations.

Molecular testing should be done wherever possible. Most of these patients will be treated with a palliative approach. Doublet chemotherapy is a long-standing standard of care. Triplet therapy may be offered where a more aggressive approach is indicated. Combination with anti -vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies and/or anti EGFR antibodies is also considered standard. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab can be used for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumours; Left and right sided tumours are distinct entities. Combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy is used as per individual patient and tumour characteristics.Oligometastatic disease can be approached with potentially curative intent. Cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy can be offered to selected patients with peritoneal only metastases. Stereotactic body radiation therapy can be used as local therapy for patients with oligometastatic liver only disease who cannot be taken up for surgery. New strategies include induction-maintenance chemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy. All drugs/ regimen included as standard of care in the first line can also be used in subsequent lines. Specific targetable driver mutation tumours can be treated accordingly with their complementary biological therapy.

Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are possible when patient and caregivers choose to become active participants.

We evaluated the comparative efficacy of six later-line (≥3) therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) over placebo. We applied a novel statistical method of reconstructing pseudo-patient-level data (pseudo-IPD) to inform a network meta-analysis of survival curves that considers shape in addition to scale parameters.

A literature search yielded 10 phase II/III trials. We digitized all survival curves and applied a novel method incorporating curve coordinates, patients-at-risk, and events reported to generate pseudo-IPD. Using fitted random effects lognormal distributions, we estimated the survival proportions and HRs (95CrI) of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over 12 months of follow-up.

Compared to placebo, in ascending order, 12-month OS HRs were 0.50 (95% CrI = 0.35, 0.69; PFS = 0.11 (95% CrI = 0.06, 0.14)) for TAS+bevacizumab; 0.71 (95% CrI = 0.51, 0.97; PFS = 0.26 (95% CrI = 0.16, 0.41)) for regorafenib; 0.75 (95% CrI = 0.61, 0.91; (PFS = 0.24 (95% CrI = 0.17, 0.31)) for TAS-102; 0.80 (95% CrI = 0.79, 0.90; PFS = 0.18 (95% CrI = 0.13, 0.24)) for fruquintinib; 0.83 (95% CrI = 0.50, 0.99; PFS = 0.42 (95% CrI = 0.20, 0.75)) for atezolizumab+cobimetinib; and 1.03 (95% CrI = 0.55, 1.65; PFS = 0.67 (95% CrI = 0.29, 1.01)) for atezolizumab.

In this independent NMA of survival data, all later-line mCRC therapies but atezolizumab monotherapy exhibited superiority in 12-month PFS and OS over placebo. TAS+bevacizumab emerged as the most dominant option and may be the preferred choice, with fruquintinib, regorafenib, and TAS-102 monotherapy showing statistically significant but lower PFS and OS benefits.

PROSPERO: CRD42022371953.

The liver is the most frequent site of metastases in colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to assess the response rate and survival outcomes in metastatic CRC patients with non-liver metastases (NLM) compared to those with liver metastases (LM) across different lines of treatment.

A total of 17,924 mCRC patients included in 26 trials from the ARCAD CRC database were analyzed. The analysis was conducted based on the presence or absence of LM across different treatment groups: chemotherapy (CT) alone, CT + anti-VEGF, CT + anti-EGFR in KRAS wild-type tumors, within the first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L), and patients enrolled in third-line (≥3 L) trials treated with trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib or placebo. The endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR).

Out of the 17,924 patients, 14,066 had LM (30.6 % with only liver involvement and 69.4 % with liver and other metastatic sites), while 3858 patients had NLM. In the CT alone and CT + anti-VEGF subgroups, NLM patients showed better OS and PFS in the 1 L and 2 L settings. However, in the CT + anti-EGFR 1 L and 2 L subgroups, there was no significant difference in OS and PFS between NLM and LM patients. In the ≥ 3 L subgroups, better OS and PFS were observed in NLM patients. ORRs were higher in LM patients than in NLM patients across all cohorts treated in the 1 L and only in the anti-EGFR cohort in the 2 L.

LM is a poor prognostic factor for mCRC increasing from 1 L to ≥ 3 L except for patients in 1 L and 2 L receiving CT+anti-EGFR. These data justify using LM as a stratification factor in future trials for patients with unresectable mCRC.

Overall, it is estimated that more than 3,500,000 patients have received Bevacizumab as part of systemic oncologic treatment. Bevacizumab and its biosimilars are currently marketed in over 130 countries. Given the wide usage of Bevacizumab in current oncological practice, it is very important to compare the "real-world" results to those obtained in controlled clinical trials. This study aims to describe the clinical experience of using Bevacizumab in a large cohort of cancer patients in "non-controlled real-world" conditions with regard to effectiveness, safety, and cost of therapy.

For this purpose, we conducted an open, observational, retrospective study involving all patients treated for solid malignant tumors in the Bucharest Institute of Oncology with "Prof. Dr. Al. Trestioreanu" with Bevacizumab-based systemic therapy, between 2017 and 2021.

The study consisted of 657 treatment episodes in 625 patients (F/B = 1.62/1, with a median age of 57.6 years) which were treated for malignant tumors (majority colorectal, non-small cell lung, ovarian, and breast cancer). First-line treatment was administered in 229 patients, and the rest received Bevacizumab as second or subsequent lines of treatment. The overall response rate to Bevacizumab-based therapies was around 60-65% across all indication except for subsequent treatment lines in colorectal and ovarian cancers, where lower values were recorded (27.1%, and 31.5% respectively). Median PFS for the entire cohort was 8.2 months (95% CI 6.8-9.6), and the median OS was 13.2 months (95% CI 11.5-14.9). Usual bevacizumab-related toxicities were observed, including bleeding, hypertension, wound-healing complications, gastrointestinal perforation, other types of fistulas, septic complications, and thromboembolic events. Although the clinical benefits are undeniable, the addition of Bevacizumab to standard chemotherapy increased the overall treatment cost by 213%.

Bevacizumab remains a high-cost therapy, but it can add to clinical benefits (like overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rate) when used in conjunction with standard chemotherapy. Similar results as those presented in various controlled trials are observable even on unselected cohorts of patients in the uncontrolled conditions of "real-world" oncological practice. Off-label usage is encountered in clinical practice, and this aspect should be monitored given the potential adverse effects of the therapy.

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant regimens (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX/CAPOX]) are used after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, real-world evidence regarding treatment sequences and outcomes in patients with early recurrence CRC after adjuvant chemotherapy is limited.

We aimed to describe the patient characteristics, treatment sequence, and overall duration of second-line (2L) therapy in patients with early recurrence CRC who received adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX/CAPOX) followed by folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + anti-angiogenesis drugs (AA) or FOLFIRI + anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies.

This retrospective study analyzed Japanese administrative data from November 2014 to March 2023 of adult patients who underwent CRC resection surgery, started FOLFOX/CAPOX ≤3 months (mo) after surgery, and had early CRC recurrence. Early recurrence was defined as initiation of FOLFIRI+AA or FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies as 2L therapy, ≤12 mo of discontinuing adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence, median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), i.e., duration between the start and end dates of 2L therapy (Kaplan-Meier method), and factors associated with 2L time to treatment discontinuation constituted the study outcomes (Cox regression model). Subgroup analyses were performed for timing of early CRC recurrence (≤6 mo and 6-12 mo) and tumor sidedness.

Among the 832 selected patients (median age [minimum-maximum] 67 (24-86) years, 56.4% male), CAPOX (71.3%) was more commonly used than FOLFOX (28.7%) as adjuvant therapy. FOLFIRI+AA (72.5%) was used more commonly than FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies (27.5%) in 2L. AA and anti-EGFR antibodies groups had similar mTTD: 6.2 mo (95% confidence interval 5.8, 6.9) and 6.1 mo (95% confidence interval 5.2, 7.4). Age ≥70 years showed significant association with shorter 2L treatment duration (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 1.4; p = 0.03). The AA cohort's mTTD was numerically shorter in the ≤6 mo recurrence subgroup compared with the 6-12 mo recurrence subgroup (6.1 mo vs 8.1 mo); the anti-EGFR antibodies cohort had similar mTTD (5.8 mo vs 6.2 mo). The AA and anti-EGFR antibodies cohorts also had similar mTTD in the left-sided CRC subgroup (6.5 mo vs 6.2 mo), but not in the right-sided subgroup (5.6 mo vs 3.9 mo).

This is the first administrative data-based real-world evidence on treatment sequence and outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC treated with FOLFIRI+AAs or FOLFIRI+ anti-EGFR antibodies after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan. Both regimens had similar TTD, but relapse timing and tumor sidedness may influence their efficacy.

The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are often inadequate for the early assessment of the response to cancer therapy, particularly bevacizumab-based chemotherapy. In a first cohort of patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM), we showed that variations of the tumor-to-liver density (TTLD) ratio and modified size-based criteria determined using computed tomography (CT) data at the first restaging were better prognostic criteria than the RECIST. The aims of this study were to confirm the relevance of these radiological biomarkers as early predictors of the long-term clinical outcome and to assess their correlation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) parameters in a new patient cohort.

In this post-hoc study of the multicenter STIC-AVASTIN trial, we retrospectively reviewed CT data of patients with CRLM treated with bevacizumab-based regimens. We determined the size, density and TTLD ratio of target liver lesions at baseline and at the first restaging and also performed a morphologic evaluation according to the MD Anderson criteria. We assessed the correlation of these parameters with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using the log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazard model. We also examined the association between TTLD ratio and quantitative CEUS parameters.

This analysis concerned 79 of the 137 patients included in the STIC-AVASTIN trial. PFS and OS were significantly longer in patients with tumor size reduction > 15% at first restaging, but were not correlated with TTLD ratio variations. However, PFS was longer in patients with TTLD ratio > 0.6 at baseline and first restaging than in those who did not reach this threshold. In the multivariate analysis, only baseline TTLD ratio > 0.6 was a significant survival predictor. TTLD ratio > 0.6 was associated with improved perfusion parameters.

Although TTLD ratio variations did not correlate with the long-term clinical outcomes, TTLD absolute values remained a good predictor of survival at baseline and first restaging, and may reflect tumor microvascular features that might influence bevacizumab-based treatment efficiency.

NCT00489697, registration number of the STIC-AVASTIN trial.

Herein, we report the successful treatment using atezolizumab plus bevacizumab of a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with a portal vein tumor thrombus and multiple pulmonary metastases from rectal cancer with microsatellite stability. This patient developed rectal cancer with synchronous pulmonary metastases and HCC. After resecting the primary lesion of the rectal cancer, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization was performed for the HCC. Drug therapy was planned for multiple pulmonary metastases of rectal cancer; however, the early development of recurrent HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus had to be highly prioritized, and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was introduced. Following the disappearance of the recurrent HCC lesion, the metastatic pulmonary nodules shrunk into scar-like spots. The treatment for both HCC and pulmonary metastases of rectal cancer were considered to result in clinical complete response.

Exchange protein directly activated by cAMP 1 (EPAC1), a major isoform of guanine nucleotide exchange factors, is highly expressed in vascular endothelia cells and regulates angiogenesis in the retina. High intratumor microvascular densities (MVD) resulting from angiogenesis is responsible for breast cancer development. Downregulation of EPAC1 in tumor cell reduces triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)-induced angiogenesis. However, whether Epac1 expressed in vascular endothelial cells contributes to angiogenesis and tumor development of TNBC remains elusive.

We employed NY0123, a previously identified potent EPAC inhibitor, to explore the anti-angiogenic biological role of EPAC1 in vitro and in vivo through vascular endothelial cells, rat aortic ring, Matrigel plug, and chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) and yolk sac membrane (YSM) assays, as well as the in vivo xenograft tumor models of TNBC in both chick embryo and mice.

Inhibiting EPAC1 in vascular endothelial cells by NY0123 significantly suppresses angiogenesis and tumor growth of TNBC. In addition, NY0123 possesses a better inhibitory efficacy than ESI-09, a reported specific EPAC inhibitor tool compound. Importantly, inhibiting EPAC1 in vascular endothelia cells regulates the typical angiogenic signaling network, which is associated with not only vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)/vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR2) signaling, but also PI3K/AKT, MEK/ERK and Notch pathway.

Our findings support that EPAC1 may serve as an effective anti-angiogenic therapeutic target of TNBC, and EPAC inhibitor NY0123 has the therapeutic potential to be developed for the treatment of TNBC.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading tumor worldwide. In CRC, the angiogenic pathway plays a crucial role in cancer development and the process of metastasis. Thus, anti-angiogenic drugs represent a milestone for metastatic CRC (mCRC) treatment and lead to significant improvement of clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, not all patients respond to treatment and some develop resistance. Therefore, the identification of predictive factors able to predict response to angiogenesis pathway blockade is required in order to identify the best candidates to receive these agents. Unfortunately, no predictive biomarkers have been prospectively validated to date. Over the years, research has focused on biologic factors such as genetic polymorphisms, circulating biomarkers, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and microRNA. Moreover, research efforts have evaluated the potential correlation of molecular biomarkers with imaging techniques used for tumor assessment as well as the application of imaging tools in clinical practice. In addition to functional imaging, radiomics, a relatively newer technique, shows real promise in the setting of correlating molecular medicine to radiological phenotypes.