Pollen allergy may influence irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms; however, available data are scant.

This study aims to assess symptom variability in atopic IBS patients.

We retrospectively analysed consecutive adult IBS patients evaluated between 2021 and 2024. Patients from the overall IBS cohort and the IBS-diarrhoea (IBS-D) subgroup were classified according to their sensitisation into grass-positive, house dust mite (HDM)-positive, or unsensitised. Symptom burden was assessed using the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS) and a visual analogue scale for abdominal pain/distension, both outside the season period (T0) and during the pollination season (T1).

A total of 61 IBS patients were recruited (median age 34 years, IQR 25-50, F:M ratio 3.6:1), including 38 patients (62.8%) with IBS-D (median age 30 years, IQR 28-47, F:M ratio 2.8:1). Atopy was common in the IBS-D subgroup, particularly with respiratory manifestations. The mean GSRS significantly (p < 0.01) increased at T1 (variance of 3.4 points) only in grass-sensitised patients as opposed to those sensitised to HDM or unsensitised ones; this effect was present only in the IBS-D subgroup, while no significant variation was observed in the overall cohort.

Pollination season influences symptoms in IBS-D patients sensitised to seasonal allergens.

Diseases of the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) account for a significant portion of a primary care physician's practice in Pakistan, a South Asian lower-middle income country. This increasing burden demands comprehensive clinical practice guidelines and primary care clinical referral algorithms to be devised so that general physicians can adequately provide standardized primary health care and prevent needless specialist ENT referrals.

We selected eight guidelines regarding epistaxis, neck masses, hearing loss, Meniere's disease, dysphonia, allergic rhinitis, acute otitis externa, and rhinosinusitis from the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation as the source guidelines and employed the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach to contextualize guidelines by adopting, adapting, or excluding recommendations from these guidelines. Clinical referral algorithms were created using recommendations from the created clinical practice guidelines, with additional recommendations being sought via a best evidence review process.

We successfully created local clinical practice guidelines for the eight ENT conditions using the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT process. While most recommendations were adopted in the local clinical practice guidelines, one recommendation for acute otitis externa, hearing loss, and epistaxis and two for allergic rhinitis were adopted with minor changes to provide supporting information. Six recommendations were excluded mostly due to the unavailability of services in Pakistan. Eight clinical referral algorithms were also created which incorporated 17 additional recommendations to fill gaps in clinical practice including four additional recommendations to the epistaxis algorithm, three for neck lumps/mass, rhinosinusitis, and allergic rhinitis, two for acute otitis externa, and one for Meniere's disease and dysphonia algorithms.

The newly created clinical practice guidelines will help in the provision of standardized, high-quality care at the primary care level. Concomitantly, the clinical referral pathways can assist the general physicians in the management of patients as well as guide appropriate timely referrals to ENT specialists.

Allergic rhinitis (AR), non-allergic rhinitis (NAR), and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) share a type 2 inflammation. Thus, intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are recommended for managing these diseases. In this regard, budesonide aqueous nasal spray (BANS) has been an effective and safe INCS available for decades. As a recent Delphi consensus and a survey explored the use of topical nasal therapy in practice, a panel of experts promoted a multidisciplinary Delphi consensus on BANS in daily practice. Forty-six Italian expert otorhinolaryngologists, allergologists, and pediatricians participated in the initiative. Twenty-one statements were voted on. There was a large agreement with all statements. Thus, this document proposed a valuable BANS use in managing patients with AR, NAR, or CRSwNP considering the relevant activity on dampening type 2 inflammation. Moreover, the safety profile was considered good, also concerning the bioavailability issue. However, based on the severity of the disease, BANS use should be prescribed as cycles or for prolonged periods.  In conclusion, the present multidisciplinary Delphi consensus supported BANS use in upper airway type 2 diseases.

Atopic/allergic diseases impose a growing burden on public health, affecting millions of patients worldwide. The main objective of this study was to develop a national expert consensus on relevant clinical questions related to type 2 inflammation.

We conducted: a comprehensive literature review with a qualitative analysis to identify the most repeated themes on the overlap of conditions; a modified 3-round Web-Delphi (or e-Delphi); and a final online decision conference.

We included 51 studies. Following three Web-Delphi rounds, we ended up with 30 statements with a 76% overall full agreement rate, 16% agreement, 2% disagreement, and 0% full disagreement. The decision conference enabled adjustments, and the expert panel agreed unanimously on the final set of statements. The consensus used evidence synthesis, Web-Delphi, and decision conference to produce 30 statements on type 2 inflammation as a driver for multimorbidity in asthma, certain rhinitis phenotypes, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, and eosinophilic esophagitis grouped under five domains in underlying pathophysiology, multimorbidity, diagnosis and management, multidisciplinary management, and impact on mental health.

We expect the first Portuguese expert consensus INFLAT2-PT to promote understanding of type 2 inflammation diseases, multidisciplinary care, integrated care pathways, future research, and inform health authorities.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic inflammatory airway disease caused by inhaled allergens, and its prevalence has increased in recent decades. AR not only causes nasal leakage, itchy nose, nasal congestion, sneezing, and allergic conjunctivitis but also induces asthma, as well as sleep disorders, anxiety, depression, memory loss, and other phenomena that seriously affect the patient's ability to study and work, lower their quality of life, and burden society. The current methods used to diagnose and treat AR are still far from ideal. Multi-omics technology can be used to comprehensively and systematically analyze the differentially expressed DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites and their biological functions in patients with AR. These capabilities allow for an in-depth understanding of the intrinsic pathogenic mechanism of AR, the ability to explore key cells and molecules that drive its progression, and to design personalized treatment for AR. This article summarizes the progress made in studying AR by use of genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiomics in order to illustrate the important role of multi-omics technologies in facilitating the precise diagnosis and treatment of AR.

Allergic rhinitis (AR), the most prevalent immunological disease, affects approximately 400 million individuals globally and can significantly impact quality of life (QoL). Despite nearly 25 years of guidelines, AR remains largely under- diagnosed, suboptimally treated and poorly controlled. In the light of new knowledge and treatment options, there is a necessity to update or revise fundamental AR definitions to facilitate communication across diverse specialties engaged in its treatment and to improve patient care. The European Forum for Research and Education in Allergy and Airway Diseases (EUFOREA) convened a meeting of experts and patient representatives to deliberate the optimal methodology for measuring AR treatment responses and establishing novel treatment goals. This paper presents a consensus on revised AR definitions, including control, severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (SARC), refractory severe allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (R-SARC), remission, resolution, improvement, exacerbation, treatable traits (TTs), treat to target, relapse, progression, disease modification, and prevention.

Since we published the "IV Brazilian Consensus on Rhinitis", in2017, several advances have been achieved and have enabled a further understanding of the different aspects of "Rhinitis". This new guideline, developed jointly by ASBAI, SBP and SBORL, represents a relevant milestone in the updated and integrated management of the different forms of the disease, and it aims to unify evidence-based approaches to improve the diagnosis and treatment of this common and often underestimated condition. The document covers a wide range of topics, including clear definitions of the different phenotypes and endotypes of rhinitis, risk factors, updated diagnostic criteria, and recommended methods for clinical and laboratory investigation. We stress the importance of detailed clinical history and objective assessment, as well as tools for control and assessing severity tools an accurate diagnostic approach to the disease. Regarding treatment, it emphasizes the treatment customization, considering the severity of symptoms, the presence of comorbidities and the impact on the patient's quality of life. We discuss different drug treatment, in addition to non-pharmacological measures, such as environmental control and specific immunotherapy; and the possible role of immunobiological agents. Furthermore, the consensus addresses issues related to patient education, prevention and management of special situations, such as rhinitis in children, in pregnant women and in the elderly. In short, the "V Brazilian Consensus on Rhinitis" represents a comprehensive and updated guide for healthcare professionals involved in the diagnosis and management of rhinitis, aiming to improve patients' quality of life through an integrated and evidence-based approach.

We previously found that intravenous injection of extracellular vesicles (EVs) from human adipose tissue-derived stem cells (hADSC) could ameliorate allergic rhinitis (AR) in mice through immunomodulatory effects. In clinical trials, nasal delivery has been an attractive treatment for AR. We sought to determine whether there are differences in the therapeutic effects between caudal injection and their combination. We treated AR mice with ADSC-EVs via caudal vein, nasal cavity, or both. After treatment, the mice were re-sensitized and the indices of behavior, nasal mucosa morphology, and cytokine secretion of the mice under different modes of administration were calculated. The resultes show that tail vein, nasal, and combined administration could effectively relieve the inflammatory infiltration of the nasal mucosa of mice, reduce the secretion of IgE, IL-4, and other inflammatory factors, and alleviate the Th1/Th2 imbalance. Injection and nasal delivery, as well as their combination, effectively alleviated the symptoms of rhinitis in mice. Nasal administration has a better therapeutic effect when the inflammatory response is mild. It could be speculated that ADSC-EVs have excellent properties in the treatment of AR, and modes of administration can be selected for different stages of treatment in clinical therapy.

This study endeavors to comprehensively assess the efficacy of a multimodal therapy protocol in the management and treatment of allergic rhinitis.

This study employed a randomized controlled trial design, enrolling a total of 100 patients, who were randomly assigned to either the experimental group (receiving multimodal therapy) or the control group (receiving standard treatment), with 50 patients in each group. All enrolled patients were diagnosed based on standard guidelines for allergic rhinitis. Standardized AR questionnaires were used to assess patients' symptoms. The primary outcome measures included the time of nasal allergy symptom relief and treatment effectiveness. Statistical software will be utilized for data analysis.

The experimental group showed shorter relief times for symptoms such as nasal itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing compared to the control group. Specifically, the relief times for nasal itching, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, and sneezing in the experimental group were (3.16 ± 0.45) days, (2.68 ± 0.55) days, (2.51 ± 0.23) days, and (3.41 ± 0.31) days, respectively, while the control group's respective times were (5.13 ± 0.77) days, (4.35 ± 0.71) days, (4.85 ± 0.63) days, and (6.73 ± 0.99) days (P < 0.05). After treatment, the total effective rate in the experimental group reached 90.0%, significantly higher than the 66.0% in the control group (P < 0.05).

The results of this study indicate that multimodal therapy not only exhibits significant effectiveness in the management of allergic rhinitis but also holds potential advantages in improving patients' quality of life. These findings provide a new perspective for the treatment of AR and may have significant implications for the design and optimization of future AR treatment regimens.

The production of low-cost, small footprint imaging sensor would be invaluable for airborne global monitoring of pollen, which could allow for mitigation of hay fever symptoms. We demonstrate the use of a white light LED (light emitting diode) to illuminate pollen grains and capture their scattering pattern using a Raspberry Pi camera. The scattering patterns are transformed into 20× microscope magnification equivalent images using deep learning. We show the ability to produce images of pollen from plant species previously unseen by the neural network in training. Such a technique could be applied to imaging airborne particulates that contribute to air pollution, and could be used in the field of environmental science, health science and agriculture.

Asthma, characterized as a chronic heterogeneous airway disease, often presents with common comorbid conditions. The concept of "one airway, one disease" was coined more than 20 years ago, emphasizing the connection between asthma and upper airway comorbidities (UACs) such as allergic or nonallergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps, and aspirin/nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease. Since then, numerous studies have demonstrated that UACs are closely related and affect asthma phenotypes. Recognizing these UACs and managing them are crucial aspects of comprehensive asthma care. Addressing these conditions as part of asthma treatment can lead to better control of symptoms, improved lung function, and better quality of life. Moreover, it is important to explore the field of respiratory biologics, which represents the latest advancements in medical treatment options for patients with asthma and UACs.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is the most frequent IgE-mediated disease, mainly in children and adolescents. Management of AR in the pediatric age may be heterogeneous, and the available guidelines do not adequately consider this issue. As a result, the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP) promoted a Delphi Consensus to define and evaluate the most relevant aspects of AR management in the pediatric setting in Italy. A qualified board of experts prepared a list of statements that a panel of Italian experts voted on using a web platform. Forty-two pediatricians participated. The results showed that all statements had consensus (> 80% of scores 4 + 5). In particular, there was awareness that AR is a type 2 inflammatory disease requiring adequate treatment. Topical drugs should be preferred, as they are better with cycles. Combined antihistamine/corticosteroid is also considered effective and safe in adolescents. In conclusion, AR deserves adequate attention and care. Current medications are safe and effective; treatment should be addressed to dampen type 2 inflammation and relieve complaints.

As there is much controversy in using intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) as a therapeutic means for allergic rhinitis (AR), its efficacy and safety for AR were investigated based on a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Databases PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science were employed to retrieve relevant randomized control studies on ILIT for AR. The search deadline was September 15, 2023. Meta-analysis was performed on the data of the included literature using Stata 15.0.

Eleven randomized control studies were included involving a total of 406 patients. Meta-analysis results revealed that ILIT improved patients' quality of life [standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) = (-1.00, -0.050)], and reduced the adverse events of nasal symptoms [risk ratio (RR) = 0.16, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.45)] as compared to control, whereas no significant difference was discovered in symptom score [SMD = 0.14, 95% CI = (-0.34, 0.62)], IgE [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = (-0.44, 2.30)], medication scores [SMD = 1.37, 95% CI = (-0.45, 3.18)], comprehensive symptom and medication scores [SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = (-0.62, 2.47)], nasal symptoms [RR = 0.16, 95% CI = (0.06, 0.45)], and lymphadenectasis [RR = 2.27, 95% CI = (0.37, 6.73)] versus control.

After the application of the ILIT strategy against AR, the quality of life of patients was improved and the incidence of adverse events associated with nasal symptoms was reduced, but the conclusion needed further verification with more high-quality research.

Warm needle acupuncture is a distinct form of acupuncture therapy in which, after the needle is inserted into the acupoint, a lit moxa stick is placed on the needle's handle.

This research aims to provide evidence for efficacy and safety of warm needle acupuncture for allergic rhinitis.

Seven online databases were searched for study collection, which were published up to March 15th, 2022. Keywords of searching included "AR", "allergic rhinitis", "anaphylactic rhinitis", "warming needle", "warming needle acupuncture", "needle warming moxibustion", "warm needle", "warm needling method" and "warmed needle". The quality of the included trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

Among the included trials, warm needle acupuncture-either alone or in combination with Western medicine or other acupoint-based therapies-served as the primary intervention for the experimental groups. In contrast, the control groups received treatments such as Western medicine alone, manual acupuncture alone, or a combination of electro and manual acupuncture. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were conducted using RevMan 5.3, following the Cochrane systematic review methodology, while trial sequential analysis was performed with TSA 0.9. The quality of the findings was assessed using GRADEpro.

Finally, 23 studies involving 2230 participants were covered. Results of this study revealed that warm needle acupuncture only, or with western medicine, or with other acupoint-based interventions were significantly superior to western medicine alone, manual acupuncture alone, or electro plus manual acupuncture for allergic rhinitis. Adverse events associated with warm needle acupuncture included sensations of chest tightness, throat itching, and allergic reactions to moxa smoke; however, these occurrences were not more frequent than those observed with Western medicine. There is need for RCTs of high quality with placebo or waitlist controls of the intervention for allergic rhinitis.

Warm needle acupuncture is with potential efficacy and is safe for patients with allergic rhinitis, but more trials are need for further confirmation of the evidence.

Establishing the interaction between aeroallergens and air pollution in children with house dust mite induced allergic rhinitis (HDM-AR) remains challenging, especially in urban areas. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and the subsequent lockdown measures provided a valuable opportunity.

We analyzed the clinical data of HDM-AR children between March and August in 2018-2020, and classified the children according to the type and the degree of HDM sensitization. The records of patients' hospital visits, allergic rhinitis symptoms assessments, and air pollution measurements in Shanghai were used to assess the differences before (2018-2019) and during the pandemic (2020), as well as during lockdown (March-June) and unlockdown (July-August) period in 2020.

The study included 1570 HDM-AR children aged 2 to 8 years old, 815 (51.9%) were monosensitized to HDM (mono-HDM-AR), and 755 (48.1%) were polysensitized to HDM (poly-HDM-AR). There was a significant increase in the rate of clinical visits among children with HDM-AR during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to pre-pandemic (P < 0.001), particularly among older children aged 7-8 years (P = 0.01). During the unlockdown period, there was a notable decrease in clinical visits for children with poly-HDM-AR (P < 0.001). Children with high levels of HDM sensitization exhibited significant symptom improvement in unlockdown period (P < 0.001). Although the air pollutants concentration had improved during the study, there was no effect on the improvement of HDM-AR children as expected.

The COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdown measures provided a unique context to observe the dynamics of management in children with HDM-AR. The findings underscore the complexity of managing allergic conditions in pediatric populations, highlighting the influence of environmental and lifestyle changes on disease presentation and the need for tailored approaches to treatment during periods of societal disruption.

Allergic rhinitis is an inflammatory disorder affecting nasal mucosa in response to allergen exposure and is commonly assessed and managed in family medicine. In this article, we review new international guidelines on the diagnosis and management of allergic rhinitis and generate evidence-informed recommendations for family medicine doctors.

Objectives: We investigated the effectiveness of different types of nasal irrigation sprays in adult allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. Methods: A total of 1700 patients with AR (866 males and 834 females) were assigned to: Group 1: Hypertonic nasal spray group (n = 600) (Sinomarin® hypertonic nasal spray); Group 2: Algae-containing hypertonic nasal spray group (n = 600) (Sinomarin Plus Algae ENT); and Group 3: Isotonic saline nasal spray group (n = 500). All patients underwent an otolaryngological examination, continued their standard AR treatment, and received the assigned nasal spray additionally (1 spray to each nostril, 3 times a day, for 3 weeks). Allergic symptom scores, turbinate examination, total symptom scores, and quality of life (QoL) scores were evaluated during pre- and post-treatment periods. Results: In groups 1 and 2, symptom scores and turbinate color and edema, total symptom scores, and QoL scores increased after treatment (P < .05). In the saline group, there were no significant differences in symptom scores and total symptom scores after treatment; however, improvement was detected in turbinate color and edema values after treatment. QoL scores increased after treatment. When comparing the 3 groups, the total symptom scores of groups 1 and 2 were significantly lower, and the QoL scores of groups 1 and 2 were considerably higher than those of the saline group. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2. Conclusion: Algae-containing and hypertonic nasal spray may be added to the standard AR treatment to increase QoL and decrease total symptom scores.

To investigate the immunomodulatory effects and potential mechanisms of human nasal mucosa-derived mesenchymal stem cells(hNMSCs) on mouse allergic rhinitis, and to compare them with human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCMSCs).

hNMSCs and hUCMSCs were isolated and cultured for identification from human nasal mucosa and umbilical cord tissues. A co-culture system of LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells/mouse peritoneal macrophages and MSCs was employed.Changes in inflammatory factors in RAW264.7 cells and the culture medium as well as the expression of NF-κB signaling pathway in RAW264.7 cells were detected. Forty-eight BALB/c mice were randomly divided into control, OVA, hNMSCs, and hUCMSCs groups. An allergic rhinitis (AR) model was established through ovalbumin (OVA) stimulation and treated with hNMSCs and hUCMSCs. Subsequent assessments included related symptoms, biological changes, and the expression of the NF-κB signaling pathway in the nasal mucosa of mice.

MSCs can be successfully isolated from human nasal mucosa. Both hNMSCs and hUCMSCs interventions significantly reverseed the inflammation induced by LPS and suppressed the upregulation of the NF-κB signaling pathway in RAW264.7 cells. Treatment with hNMSCs and hUCMSCs alleviated mouse allergic symptoms, reduced levels of total IgE, OVA-specific IgE and IgG1 in mouse serum, TH2-type cytokines and chemokines in mouse nasal mucosa, and TH2-type cytokines in mouse spleen culture medium, while also inhibiting the expression of the NF-κB signaling pathway in the nasal mucosa of mice. moreover, the hNMSCs group showed a more significant reduction in OVA-specific IgG1 in serum and IL-4 expression levels in mouse spleen culture medium compared to the hUCMSCs group.

Our findings suggest that hNMSCs can ameliorate allergic rhinitis in mice, with a certain advantage in anti-inflammatory effects compared to hUCMSCs. The NF-κB pathway is likely involved in the anti-inflammatory regulation process by hNMSCs.Therefore, hNMSCs might represent a novel therapeutic approach for allergic rhinitis.

Acupuncture has been shown for the treatment of allergic rhinitis in previous studies. Nevertheless, relevant evidence was lacked for paediatric patients with allergic rhinitis. We aim to validate the efficacy of acupuncture for allergic rhinitis in children by meta-analysis and trial sequence analysis.

Comprehensive search of eight databases were conducted until August 27, 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing acupuncture alone or in combination with drugs versus medication in children with AR were included. The primary outcome was total nasal symptom score (TNSS). The secondary outcomes were serum immunoglobulin E levels, and relapse rates.

Thirteen studies involving 1186 participants were included. In results, acupuncture group (AC group) versus medication group (Med group) shows no significant difference in the treatment of AR in children (risk ratio [RR] = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.97 to 1.24, p = 0.13), while TSA suggested the included sample size did not exceed required information size (RIS). Significant differences were found between the AC + Med group versus the Med group (RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.17 to 1.42, p < 0.00001), with sufficient sample size. Results in serum IgE after treatment which favored the Med group (MD = 51.94, 95% CI [22.24, 81.65], p = 0.0006). In terms of relapse rate, The AC group had a lower relapse rate than the Med group (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.26-0.63, p < 0.0001).

Acupuncture is an efficacious treatment for allergic rhinitis in children, but this conclusion might be limited by the generally low quality of evidence. TSA suggested additional high-quality trials with larger sample sizes and longer treatment durations were needed.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent disease in Canada that affects both children and adults. Several guidelines for the management of AR have been published by professional allergy societies worldwide. However, there are regional differences in the clinical management of AR, and regulatory approval of some AR pharmacotherapies varies among countries. Thus, six research questions specific to the treatment of AR in Canada were identified for this focused practice parameter. Reviews of the literature published since 2016 were conducted to obtain evidence-based support for the responses of the Work Group to each research question. In response to research question 1 "In patients with symptoms indicative of AR, is serum-specific IgE sufficient to identify candidates for immunotherapy or is a skin prick test mandatory?" the Work Group concluded that either sIgE testing or skin prick test are acceptable for diagnosing AR and guiding immunotherapy. In response to research question 2 "When taking into account the preferences of the patient and the prescriber (stakeholder engagement) should second-generation oral antihistamine (OAH) or intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) be first line?" the Work Group concluded that existing guidelines generally agree on the use of INCS as a first-line therapy used for AR, however, patient and provider preferences and considerations can easily shift the first choice to a second-generation OAH. In response to research question 3 "Is a combination intranasal antihistamine (INAH)/INCS formulation superior to INCS plus OAH? Do they become equivalent after prolonged use?" the Work Group concluded that that the combination INAH/INCS is superior to an INCS plus OAH. However, there was insufficient evidence to answer the second question. In response to research question 4 "Do leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) have a greater benefit than OAH in AR for some symptoms to justify a therapeutic trial in those who cannot tolerate INCS?" the Work Group concluded that LTRAs have inferior, or at best equivalent, daytime or overall symptom control compared with OAH, but LTRAs may improve nighttime symptom control and provide benefits in patients with AR and concomitant asthma. In response to research question 5 "Should sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets be considered first-line immunotherapeutic options over subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) based on the evidence of efficacy?" the Work Group concluded that the choice of SLIT or SCIT cannot be made on efficacy alone, and differences in other factors outweigh any differences in efficacy. In response to research question 6 "Based on efficacy data, should ALL patients seen by an allergist be offered SLIT or SCIT as a treatment option?" the Work Group concluded that the efficacy data suggests that SLIT or SCIT should be used broadly in patients with AR, but other clinical concerns also need to be taken into consideration.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a prevalent disease in childhood and adolescence. A type 2 inflammation characterizes AR and, mainly, sustains nasal obstruction. Budesonide aqueous nasal spray (BANS) is an intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) available since the early 1980s. BANS is indicated for treating allergic rhinitis. There is evidence about its efficacy in treating children and adolescents with seasonal and perennial AR. In addition, BANS is safe with negligible local and systemic side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with AR recommend the use of INCS as first line in many situations. In particular, AR patients (and their parents) may assess the perception of symptoms' severity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). A score ≥5/10 means uncontrolled symptoms and requires adequate treatment. BANS could appropriately be used in patients with uncontrolled symptoms and/or moderate/severe nasal obstruction. In conclusion, BANS represents a valuable option in managing children and adolescents with AR.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the upper airways caused by a type I hypersensitivity reaction triggered by environmental allergens. AR is associated with significant morbidity and affects patients' quality of life, emotional well-being, productivity, and cognitive functioning. As AR prevalence and morbidity have increased significantly worldwide, similar observations have been noted in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) with AR becoming a potential public health issue. Management of AR in the UAE is mainly provided by non-allergy specialists relying on first-line treatments such as intranasal steroids and antihistamines, with often suboptimal and short-term efficacy. Allergen Immunotherapy (AIT) is the only currently available disease-modifying treatment option in the form of either subcutaneous or sublingual allergen immunotherapy that has been proven to have long-term benefits. This article aims to provide recommendations regarding the use of AIT for managing AR in the UAE, considering both the current landscape in the Emirati healthcare system and local experience.

Little is known about rhinitis control in real-life, nor about the contribution of treatment-related and patient-related factors.

This study aimed to examine the level of rhinitis control and rhinitis medication utilization in patients with persistent rhinitis and to identify predictors of rhinitis control.

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in patients with persistent rhinitis recruited in community pharmacies. Participants completed the Rhinitis Control Assessment Test, a questionnaire on patient/rhinitis characteristics, and rhinitis medication use. A visual analog scale for nasal symptoms was also completed. Pharmacy dispensing data were used to calculate adherence to intranasal glucocorticoids. Nasal spray technique was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Predictors of rhinitis control were explored using a linear regression model.

A total of 1,514 patients, recruited in 215 pharmacies, participated in the study (mean age 48.7 y, 62% female). Almost 60% exhibited suboptimal rhinitis control (Rhinitis Control Assessment Test ≤ 21 of 30). A 50-mm cut-off on the visual analog scale yielded 78.1% sensitivity to identify suboptimal rhinitis control. Participants most frequently used intranasal glucocorticoids (55.6%) and intranasal decongestants (47.4%). Only 10.3% of current nasal spray users demonstrated perfect technique. More than half (54.8%) of glucocorticoid users were identified as underadherent. Female sex, self-reported nasal hyperreactivity, active asthma, and use of oral/intranasal decongestants or nasal saline were identified as predictors of worse rhinitis control.

Suboptimal rhinitis control was common in this real-life sample of persistent rhinitis patients. Improving use of rhinitis medication may be key to increase disease control.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a common sleep-related breathing disorder affecting children. This study aims to characterize factors associated with the development and progression of severe forms of paediatric OSA.

This study included children admitted to Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, a tertiary children's hospital in southwest China between January 2020 and December 2020 with a discharge diagnosis of OSA. Each patient underwent polysomnography examination, following assessments of apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI) and lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO2) by standardized techniques. Demographic and clinical information was collected from the hospital's electronic medical records. Associations between OSA severity and various factors were first examined in a univariate logistic model, with subsequent multivariate analysis to further identify independent risk factors.

A total of 263 children were identified during the study period. Among patients presenting with OSA, 51.3% had mild and 48.7% had moderate to severe symptoms according to standardized guidelines. The incidence of mild and moderate to severe hypoxemia in our population was 39.2% and 60.8%, respectively. Allergic rhinitis (AR; adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.75, 95% CI 1.03-2.96) and male gender (aOR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.03-3.06) were significantly associated with moderate-to-severe OSA (all P-values < 0.05) after adjustment for covariates. AR was also the only significant predictor of hypoxemia (P < 0.05).

Our results suggest that male gender and presence of AR may be associated with an increased likelihood of moderate-to-severe OSA in children. These findings underscore the importance of timely intervention and individualized management for at-risk individuals.

Social determinants of health (SDHs) have a substantial impact on patient care and outcomes globally, both in low- to middle-income countries and in high-income countries. In the clinic, lack of availability of diagnostic tools, inequities in access to care, and challenges obtaining and adhering to prescribed treatment plans may further compound these issues. This article addresses a case of rhinitis in the context of SDHs and inequities in care that may affect various communities and populations around the world. SDHs may include various aspects of one's financial means, education, access to medical care, environment and living situation, and community factors, each of which could play a role in the rhinitis disease manifestations, diagnosis, and management. Allergic and nonallergic rhinitis are considered from this perspective. Rhinitis epidemiology, disease burden, and risk factors are broadly addressed. Patient evaluation, diagnostic tests, and management options are also reviewed, and issues related to SDHs are noted. Finally, inequities in care, knowledge gaps, and unmet needs are highlighted. It is critical to consider SDHs and care inequities when evaluating and treating patients for rhinitis and other allergic conditions.

While a specific number and type of antigens are recognized to detect perennial inhalant allergies, the optimal number and combination of allergens to reliably identify seasonal allergic sensitization is unclear due to limited national data. This study analyzed aeroallergen testing data from a large US clinical reference laboratory to provide guidance for optimizing seasonal allergen test selection.

The 2019 serum IgE tests for seasonal inhalant allergens were identified from the Quest Diagnostics database. Patients with results for at least 1 of 31 seasonal allergens across 4 allergen classes (11 trees, 7 weeds, 5 grasses, and 8 molds) were analyzed. A step-by-step conditional approach was employed to determine the minimum number and species of allergens needed to identify at least 98% of sensitized patients for each class.

Of 88,042 patients tested for ≥1 seasonal allergen, 1.5%, 1.8%, 1.3%, and 1.6% were tested for all trees, weeds, grasses, and molds, respectively. Of those tested for all allergens within a class, 40.4%, 38.6%, 29.5%, and 21.2% were sensitized to at least one tree, weed, grass, or mold allergen, respectively. Identification of ≥98% of sensitized patients within a class required 8 allergens for trees (mountain cedar, maple box elder, walnut, white ash, elm, birch, cottonwood, and hickory/pecan), 5 for weeds (common ragweed short, rough pigweed, English plantain, lamb's quarters/goosefoot, and Russian thistle), 3 for grasses (June/Kentucky blue grass, Johnson grass, and Bermuda grass), and 7 for molds (Alternaria alternata, Aspergillus fumigatus, Mucor racemosus, Epicoccum purpurascens, Penicillium notatum, Helminthosporium halodes, and Fusarium moniliforme).

A minimum of 23 antigens is required to optimally detect sensitization to four classes of seasonal allergens (i.e., ≥98% identification). The addition of these allergens to unique perennial allergens (cat, dog, mouse, cockroach, and 2 dust mite species) results in a comprehensive elucidation of inhalant allergen sensitization. This knowledge provides a pivotal guide for clinical laboratories as they construct allergen panels to optimize diagnostic yield.

Little is known about the safety of mite extract product Novo-Helisen Depot (NHD) as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) in the children with mite allergy especially immediate/late local reaction (LRs).

We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the adverse events of the children undergoing subcutaneous immunotherapy with NHD. Adverse events included local and systemic adverse reactions (SRs) at the very early and late stage. The correlation of the basic characteristics, laboratory analysis results, LRs and SRs were analyzed.

Two hundred and eighty-seven patients received at least 15 months of subcutaneous immunotherapy with NHD were included in the analysis. Skin-prick testing (SPT) results of D. pteronyssinus was associated with an increased risk of immediate LRs in build-up phase (OR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.37) and delayed LRs in maintenance phase (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.46), while SPT results of D. farinae was associated with an increased risk of SRs (OR = 3.22, 95% CI: 1.17, 10.00) and severe SRs (OR = 7.68, 95% CI: 1.13, 109.50). Serum IgE level of D. pteronyssinus was associated with an increased risk of SRs (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03). Patients with both asthma and allergic rhinitis was associated with an increased risk of SR, and severe SRs (P < 0.05).

NHD as SCIT is safe. The children with higher SPT level with D. farinae or D. pteronyssinus, higher serum IgE level of D. pteronyssinus, children with both asthma and allergic rhinitis, and the children with treatment interruption had higher risk of adverse events.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease with increasing prevalence globally. However, the molecular mechanism underlying AR pathogenesis remains largely undefined.

Peripheral blood and nasal mucosa samples obtained from patients with AR (n = 22), and ovalbumin-induced AR mouse model (n = 8 per group) were prepared for subsequent detection. qRT-PCR and western blot were used to detect the expression of LINC00240, miR-155-5p, PU.1 and other key molecules. ELISA assay and flow cytometry were employed to evaluate the secretion of IL-9 and T-helper 9 (Th9) cell ratio, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis, RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP), chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase reporter assays were employed to further elucidate the regulatory network of LINC00240/miR-155-5p/DNMT1. The methylation of PU.1 promoter was assessed by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). This signaling axis was further validated in the mouse model of AR.

LINC00240 was downregulated, while miR-155-5p and PU.1 were upregulated in the peripheral blood and nasal mucosa of AR patients, as well as in AR mice. This was accompanied with the increased ratio of Th9 cells and elevated IL-9 secretion. Mechanistically, LINC00240 served as a miR-155-5p sponge, and DNMT1 was a target of miR-155-5p. In addition, DNMT1 mediated the methylation of PU.1 promoter. In vivo studies verified that LINC00240 mitigated AR progression, possibly via miR-155-5p/DNMT1/PU.1-dependent Th9 differentiation.

The involvement of LINC00240 in AR pathogenesis is closely associated with Th9 differentiation through modulating DNMT1-dependent methylation of PU.1 by sponging miR-155-5p.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis are prevalent diseases. In western countries, type 2 inflammation usually characterizes these medical conditions and mainly sustains nasal obstruction. Budesonide aqueous nasal spray (BANS) is an intranasal corticosteroid (INCS) that has been available since the early 1980s. BANS is indicated for treating allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, and nasal polyps (both as treatment and prevention after surgery). Consolidated evidence confirms its efficacy in treating seasonal and perennial AR, and nonallergic rhinitis. In addition, BANS is safe with negligible local and systemic side effects. Recent guidelines for patients with AR recommend using INCS as the first line in many situations. In particular, patients may assess the perception of symptoms' severity using the Visual Analog Scale. A score ≥5/10 means uncontrolled symptoms and requires adequate treatment. BANS could appropriately be used in patients with uncontrolled symptoms and/or moderate/severe nasal obstruction. In conclusion, BANS represents a valuable option in managing patients with type 2 inflammation of the nose.

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic respiratory condition that internationally continues to be burdensome and impacts quality of life. Despite availability of medicines and guidelines for healthcare providers for the optimal management of AR, optimisation of its management in the community continues to be elusive. The reasons for this are multi-faceted and include both environmental and healthcare related factors. One factor that we can no longer ignore is that AR management is no longer limited to the domain of healthcare provider and that people with AR make their own choices when choosing how to manage their condition, without seeking advice from a health care provider. We must build a bridge between healthcare provider knowledge and guidelines and patient decision-making. With this commentary, we propose that a shared decision-making approach between healthcare professionals and people with AR be developed and promoted, with a focus on patient health literacy. As custodians of AR knowledge, we have a responsibility to ensure it is accessible to those that matter most-the people with AR.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates and compares the effects of two treatments that ablate the posterior nasal nerves for rhinitis-related symptoms: cryotherapy and radiofrequency neurolysis.

We reviewed studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, the Web of Science and the Cochrane database up to June 2023. Papers reporting quality-of-life and rhinitis-related symptom scores before and after cryotherapy, and sham-controlled studies, were analyzed.

In total, 738 patients enrolled in 10 studies were evaluated. Both cryotherapy and radiofrequency neurolysis significantly improved rhinitis-related symptoms including congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing, and quality of life during 12 months of follow-up. Radiofrequency neurolysis was significantly more effective than cryotherapy in terms of reducing total nasal symptom scores at up to 12 months postoperatively. In terms of individual symptoms, itching, rhinorrhea, and congestion were significantly alleviated or tended to be reduced more by radiofrequency neurolysis than by cryotherapy. The improvements in the minimal clinically important difference in total nasal symptom scores (1.0 point) after 3 months of cryotherapy and radiofrequency therapy were 81.8 % and 92.7 %, respectively.

Cryotherapy and radiofrequency neurolysis both improved rhinitis-symptom and quality-of-life scores. Especially, radiofrequency neurolysis showed the better effectiveness for improving the nasal symptoms related to the rhinitis than cryotherapy.

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the effect of TRNP on rhinitis-related symptoms.

We reviewed studies retrieved from PubMed, SCOPUS, Embase, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane database to June 2023. Studies that evaluated quality-of-life and rhinitis-related symptom scores before and after treatment were analyzed, as was one sham-treatment-controlled study.

In total, 406 patients evaluated in five studies were analyzed. TRNP significantly improved rhinitis-related symptoms-congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing-for up to 12 months after treatment, compared to before treatment. The most significant symptom decreases were those of rhinorrhea and nasal congestion. Rhinitis-related symptoms had improved significantly at 3 months after TRNP, compared to sham surgery. TRNP improved disease-specific quality-of-life scores on the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at 6 months after treatment, compared to before treatment. The rates of clinical improvement in terms of all nasal symptoms (reduction > 30% from baseline) and in quality of life (minimal clinically important difference > 0.4) after TRNP were 79% and 84% respectively. There was no severe adverse event associated with either device use or the overall procedure.

TRNP treatment improved subjective symptoms related to rhinitis, especially rhinorrhea and nasal congestion, and also improved disease-specific quality-of-life scores.

A child with persistent runny nose may cause significant parental anxiety and healthcare utilisation. While the most common diagnoses are recurrent acute viral upper respiratory tract infections and allergic rhinitis, a careful history and examination is necessary to exclude other causes and to identify comorbidities. Treatment can then be tailored to the underlying cause. The aim of this article is to provide a systematic approach to such patients.

Background: Rhinitis is a common inflammatory condition that affects the nasal passages, significantly impacting quality of life and placing a considerable burden on healthcare systems. While traditional treatments offer limited relief, there is a growing interest in novel therapies. This systematic review aims to analyze investigational new treatments for rhinitis. Methods: A search was conducted in ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the European Union Clinical Trials Register, as well as PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Both ongoing and completed clinical trials exploring innovative therapies for rhinitis, including immunotherapy, probiotics, and stem cell therapy, were included. Results: This systematic review compiled information from 74 clinical trials-51 completed and 23 ongoing-focused on new treatments for rhinitis. A significant portion of the completed studies (44) focused on various forms of immunotherapy, which showed potential for long-term effectiveness and had a high safety profile. Another seven completed trials investigated probiotics as a treatment method, yielding mixed results, though they did show promise in managing symptoms, particularly when combined with other treatments. The ongoing trials are primarily investigating immunotherapy, with a smaller number looking at probiotics and stem cell therapy. This shows a continued exploration of innovative and diverse therapies for managing rhinitis. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of emerging rhinitis therapies to improve patient outcomes and enhance quality of life. Continued research is recommended for developing more effective, personalized, and targeted therapeutic strategies for rhinitis.

Exposure to pollen and fungal spores can trigger asthma/allergic symptoms and affect health. Rising temperatures from climate change have been associated with earlier seasons and increasing intensity for some pollen, with weaker evidence for fungal spores. It is unclear whether climate change has resulted in changes in the exposure-response function between temperature and pollen/fungal spore concentrations over time. This study examined associations between temperature and pollen/fungal spores in different time periods and assessed potential adaptation using the longest pollen/fungal spore dataset in existence (52 years). Daily concentrations of pollen (birch and grass) and fungal spores (Cladosporium, Alternaria, Sporobolomyces and Tilletiopsis) collected between April and October from Derby (1970-2005) and Leicester (2006-2021), UK, were analysed. Cumulative seasonal concentrations (seasonal integral) and start-of-season were calculated and linked to seasonal mean temperatures (Tmeans) using generalized additive models. Daily concentrations were evaluated against daily Tmean with distributed lagged nonlinear models. Models were adjusted for precipitation, relative humidity, long-term trend and location. Seasonal and daily analyses were respectively stratified into two periods (1970-1995, 1997-2021) and five decades. Warmer seasonal Tmeans were associated with higher seasonal integral for birch, Cladosporium and Alternaria, as well as earlier start-of-season for birch, grass and Cladosporium. There were indications of changing associations with temperature in the recent decades. A warmer January was associated with higher seasonal integral for grass in 1997-2021, but not in 1970-1995. In 2000-2021, daily concentrations of birch pollen tended to remain at higher levels, vs. decrease during 1990s, when Tmean was between 13 and 15 °C. Our study suggests higher temperatures experienced in recent decades are associated with higher overall abundance of some pollen/fungal spores, which may increase future disease burdens of allergies. The changing responses of some pollen to higher temperatures over time may indicate adaptation to increasing temperatures and should be considered in climate change mitigation and adaptation planning.

We aim to assess the impact of montelukast on paediatric patients with asthma/allergic rhinitis, measured using patient-reported outcome measures, compared with other treatments or placebo.

Protocol registration CRD42020216098 (www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO). MEDLINE and Embase databases were used to conduct the search. Two authors independently selected studies and extracted data, and a third reviewer resolved discrepancies. Meta-analyses were constructed to estimate the standardised mean difference (SMD) using a random-effects model.

Out of 3937 articles identified, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria, mostly randomised clinical trials (sample sizes: 21-689 patients). The SMD of change pooled estimators for the global, mental and physical domains of health-related quality of life were not statistically significant. For daytime and night-time symptoms scores, the SMD (95% CI) was in favour of inhaled corticosteroids (-0.12, -0.20- -0.05 and -0.23, -0.41- -0.06, respectively). The pooled estimator for global asthma symptoms was better for montelukast when compared with placebo (0.90, 0.44-1.36).

The synthesis of the available evidence suggests that, in children and adolescents, montelukast was effective in controlling asthma symptoms when compared with placebo, but inhaled corticosteroids were superior in controlling symptoms, especially at night-time. These findings of our systematic review concur with current guidelines for asthma treatment.