Central nervous system (CNS) tumors are the most common solid malignancy in the pediatric population. These lesions are the result of the aberrant cell signaling step proteins, which normally regulate cell proliferation. Mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways and tyrosine kinase receptors are involved in tumorigenesis of low-grade gliomas. High-grade gliomas may carry similar mutations, but loss of epigenetic control is the dominant molecular event; it can occur either due to histone mutations or inappropriate binding or unbinding of DNA on histones. Therefore, despite the absence of genetic alteration in the classic oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, uncontrolled transcription results in tumorigenesis. Isocitric dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations do not predominate compared to their adult counterpart. Embryonic tumors include medulloblastomas, which bear mutations of transcription-regulating pathways, such as wingless-related integration sites or sonic hedgehog pathways. They may also relate to high expression of Myc family genes. Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors harbor alterations of molecules that contribute to ATP hydrolysis of chromatin. Embryonic tumors with multilayered rosettes are associated with microRNA mutations and impaired translation. Ependymomas exhibit great variability. As far as supratentorial lesions are concerned, the major events are mutations either of NFkB or Hippo pathways. Posterior fossa tumors are further divided into two types with different prognoses. Type A group is associated with mutations of DNA damage repair molecules. Lastly, germ cell tumors are a heterogeneous group. Among them, germinomas manifest KIT receptor mutations, a subgroup of the tyrosine kinase receptor family.

Recent genomic studies have allowed the subdivision of intracranial ependymomas into molecularly distinct groups with highly specific clinical features and outcomes. The majority of supratentorial ependymomas (ST-EPN) harbor ZFTA-RELA fusions which were designated, in general, as an intermediate risk tumor variant. However, molecular prognosticators within ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA have not been determined yet. Here, we performed methylation-based DNA profiling and transcriptome RNA sequencing analysis of 80 ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA investigating the clinical significance of various molecular patterns. The principal types of ZFTA-RELA fusions, based on breakpoint location, demonstrated no significant correlations with clinical outcomes. Multigene analysis disclosed 1892 survival-associated genes, and a metagene set of 100 genes subdivided ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA into favorable and unfavorable transcriptome subtypes composed of different cell subpopulations as detected by deconvolution analysis. BGN (biglycan) was identified as the top-ranked survival-associated gene and high BGN expression levels were associated with poor survival (Hazard Ratio 17.85 for PFS and 45.48 for OS; log-rank; p-value < 0.01). Furthermore, BGN immunopositivity was identified as a strong prognostic indicator of poor survival in ST-EPN, and this finding was confirmed in an independent validation set of 56 samples. Our results indicate that integrating BGN expression (at mRNA and/or protein level) into risk stratification models may improve ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA outcome prediction. Therefore, gene and/or protein expression analyses for this molecular marker could be adopted for ST-EPN ZFTA-RELA prognostication and may help assign patients to optimal therapies in prospective clinical trials.

Ependymomas exhibit heterogeneity across age, location, histology, molecular nature and survival suggestive of an epigenetic component in its pathogenesis. The CNS WHO classification (2021) classifies ependymomas based on DNA methylation profiles. Studies suggest that molecular sub-types remain stable throughout the course of disease. Immunohistochemical expression of L1CAM, has been identified as a surrogate marker for ZFTA/c11orf95-RELA fusion in supratentorial ependymomas. This study aims at realising its utility specially in resource-poor setups.

Forty-three histopathologically-proven cases of ependymoma under treatment over the period of three years were selected. Histopathological examination followed by routine IHC staining for GFAP, S-100, EMA and Ki-67 in all cases and L1CAM in the supratentorial ependymomas was done. We have followed-up almost all cases during our study period and was correlated with the IHC expression patterns and clinico-pathological parameters, including survival.

In our study the commonest location for ependymomas was spine in adults and posterior fossa in pediatric age group. Majority cases belonged to CNS WHO Grade 2 both in adults and in the paediatric age group. Supratentorial location of ependymomas with positive immuno-reactivity for L1CAM and a higher Ki-67 labelling index were associated with poor survival.

Our study revealed that L1CAM is an effective surrogate marker for supratentorial ependymomas possibly carrying the ZFTA Fusion gene product. The L1CAM immuno-reactivity also corresponded with the survival data. However, larger population-based studies are required to validate these results further.

Supratentorial (ST) ependymoma subgroups are defined by two different fusions with different prognoses. Astroblastomas, MN1-altered, have ependymal-like histopathologic features and represent a differential diagnosis in children. We hypothesized that ZFTA-fused ependymoma and YAP1-fused ependymoma on the one hand, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered, on the other hand, show different MRI characteristics.

We retrospectively analyzed the preoperative imaging of 45 patients with ST ependymoma or astroblastoma between January 2000 and September 2020, blinded to histomolecular grouping. Several characteristics, such as location, tumor volume, calcifications, solid/cystic component, and signal enhancement or diffusion were evaluated. We compared imaging characteristics according to their molecular subtype (ZFTA-fused, YAP1-fused, and astroblastoma, MN1-altered).

Thirty-nine patients were classified as having an ependymoma, 35 with a ZFTA fusion and four with a YAP1 fusion, and six as having an astroblastoma, MN1-altered. YAP1-fused ependymomas were more likely to involve at least 3 lobes than ZFTA-fused ependymomas. Astroblastomas were located in the frontal lobe in 100% of the tumors versus 49% of the ependymomas. Cerebral blood flow by arterial spin labeling was higher in astroblastomas than in ependymomas. There were no differences in the other characteristics between the molecular groups. All the tumors showed common features: intra-axial extra-ventricular tumors, very frequent contrast enhancement (39/43, 91%), a cystic/necrotic component (41/45, 91%), restricted diffusion (32/36, 89%), calcifications (15/18, 83%), and peri-tumoral edema (38/44, 86%).

The distinction between ST ependymoma subtypes and astroblastomas can be guided by several imaging features. These tumors share common imaging features that may help to differentiate ST ependymomas and astroblastomas from other pediatric ST tumors.

The 2021 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS5), introduced significant changes, impacting tumors ranging from glial to ependymal neoplasms. Ependymal tumors were previously classified and graded based on histopathology, which had limited clinical and prognostic utility. The updated CNS5 classification now divides ependymomas into 10 subgroups based on anatomic location (supratentorial, posterior fossa, and spinal compartment) and genomic markers. Supratentorial tumors are defined by zinc finger translocation associated (ZFTA) (formerly v-rel avian reticuloendotheliosis viral oncogene [RELA]), or yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) fusion; posterior fossa tumors are classified into groups A (PFA) and B (PFB), spinal ependymomas are defined by MYCN amplification. Subependymomas are present across all these anatomic compartments. The new classification kept an open category of "not elsewhere classified" or "not otherwise specified" if no pathogenic gene fusion is identified or if the molecular diagnosis is not feasible. Although there is significant overlap in the imaging findings of these tumors, a neuroradiologist needs to be familiar with updated CNS5 classification to understand tumor behavior, for example, the higher tendency for tumor recurrence along the dural flap for ZFTA fusion-positive ependymomas. On imaging, supratentorial ZFTA-fused ependymomas are preferentially located in the cerebral cortex, carrying predominant cystic components. YAP1-MAMLD1-fused ependymomas are intra- or periventricular with prominent multinodular solid components and have significantly better prognosis than ZFTA-fused counterparts. PFA ependymomas are aggressive paramedian masses with frequent calcification, seen in young children, originating from the lateral part of the fourth ventricular roof. PFB ependymomas are usually midline, noncalcified solid-cystic masses seen in adolescents and young adults arising from the fourth ventricular floor. PFA has a poorer prognosis, higher recurrence, and higher metastatic rate than PFB. Myxopapillary spinal ependymomas are now considered grade II due to high recurrence rates. Spinal-MYCN ependymomas are aggressive tumors with frequent leptomeningeal spread, relapse, and poor prognosis. Subependymomas are noninvasive, intraventricular, slow-growing benign tumors with an excellent prognosis. Currently, the molecular classification does not enhance the clinicopathologic understanding of subependymoma and myxopapillary categories. However, given the molecular advancements, this will likely change in the future. This review provides an updated molecular classification of ependymoma, discusses the individual imaging characteristics, and briefly outlines the latest targeted molecular therapies.

Gliomas are malignant tumors originating from both neuroglial cells and neural stem cells. The involvement of neural stem cells contributes to the tumor's heterogeneity, affecting its metabolic features, development, and response to therapy. This review provides a brief introduction to the importance of metabolism in gliomas before systematically categorizing them into specific groups based on their histological and molecular genetic markers. Metabolism plays a critical role in glioma biology, as tumor cells rely heavily on altered metabolic pathways to support their rapid growth, survival, and progression. Dysregulated metabolic processes, involving carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acids not only fuel tumor development but also contribute to therapy resistance and metastatic potential. By understanding these metabolic changes, key intervention points, such as mutations in genes like RTK, EGFR, RAS, and IDH can be identified, paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies. This review emphasizes the connection between metabolic pathways and clinical challenges, offering actionable insights for future research and therapeutic development in gliomas.

Diagnosing brain tumors is critical due to their complex nature. This review explores the potential of in situ hybridization for diagnosing brain neoplasms, examining their attributes and applications in neurology and oncology.

The review surveys literature and cross-references findings with the OMIM database, examining 513 records. It pinpoints mutations suitable for in situ hybridization and identifies common chromosomal and gene anomalies in brain tumors. Emphasis is placed on mutations' clinical implications, including prognosis and drug sensitivity.

Amplifications in EGFR, MDM2, and MDM4, along with Y chromosome loss, chromosome 7 polysomy, and deletions of PTEN, CDKN2/p16, TP53, and DMBT1, correlate with poor prognosis in glioma patients. Protective genetic changes in glioma include increased expression of ADGRB3/1, IL12B, DYRKA1, VEGFC, LRRC4, and BMP4. Elevated MMP24 expression worsens prognosis in glioma, oligodendroglioma, and meningioma patients. Meningioma exhibits common chromosomal anomalies like loss of chromosomes 1, 9, 17, and 22, with specific genes implicated in their development. Main occurrences in medulloblastoma include the formation of isochromosome 17q and SHH signaling pathway disruption. Increased expression of BARHL1 is associated with prolonged survival. Adenomas mutations were reviewed with a focus on adenoma-carcinoma transition and different subtypes, with MMP9 identified as the main metalloprotease implicated in tumor progression.

Molecular-genetic diagnostics for common brain tumors involve diverse genetic anomalies. In situ hybridization shows promise for diagnosing and prognosticating tumors. Detecting tumor-specific alterations is vital for prognosis and treatment. However, many mutations require other methods, hindering in situ hybridization from becoming the primary diagnostic method.

Although the basic principles of intraoperative diagnosis in surgical neuropathology have not changed in the last century, the last several decades have seen dramatic changes in tumor classification, terminology, molecular classification, and modalities used for intraoperative diagnosis. As many neuropathologic intraoperative diagnoses are performed by general surgical pathologists, awareness of these recent changes is important for the most accurate intraoperative diagnosis.

To describe recent changes in the practice of intraoperative surgical neuropathology, with an emphasis on new entities, tumor classification, and anticipated ancillary tests, including molecular testing.

The sources for this review include the fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of the Central Nervous System, primary literature on intraoperative diagnosis and newly described tumor entities, and the authors' clinical experience.

A significant majority of neuropathologic diagnoses require ancillary testing, including molecular analysis, for appropriate classification. Therefore, the primary goal for any neurosurgical intraoperative diagnosis is the identification of diagnostic tissue and the preservation of the appropriate tissue for molecular testing. The intraoperative pathologist should seek to place a tumor in the most accurate diagnostic category possible, but specific diagnosis at the time of an intraoperative diagnosis is often not possible. Many entities have seen adjustments to grading criteria, including the incorporation of molecular features into grading. Awareness of these changes can help to avoid overgrading or undergrading at the time of intraoperative evaluation.

A novel methylation class, "neuroepithelial tumor, with PLAGL1 fusion" (NET-PLAGL1), has recently been described, based on epigenetic features, as a supratentorial pediatric brain tumor with recurrent histopathological features suggesting an ependymal differentiation. Because of the recent identification of this neoplastic entity, few histopathological, radiological and clinical data are available. Herein, we present a detailed series of nine cases of PLAGL1-fused supratentorial tumors, reclassified from a series of supratentorial ependymomas, non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 fusion-positive and subependymomas of the young. This study included extensive clinical, radiological, histopathological, ultrastructural, immunohistochemical, genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation profiling) data for characterization. An important aim of this work was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of a novel fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting the PLAGL1 gene. Using histopathology, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy, we confirmed the ependymal differentiation of this new neoplastic entity. Indeed, the cases histopathologically presented as "mixed subependymomas-ependymomas" with well-circumscribed tumors exhibiting a diffuse immunoreactivity for GFAP, without expression of Olig2 or SOX10. Ultrastructurally, they also harbored features reminiscent of ependymal differentiation, such as cilia. Different gene partners were fused with PLAGL1: FOXO1, EWSR1 and for the first time MAML2. The PLAGL1 FISH presented a 100% sensitivity and specificity according to RNA sequencing and DNA methylation profiling results. This cohort of supratentorial PLAGL1-fused tumors highlights: 1/ the ependymal cell origin of this new neoplastic entity; 2/ benefit of looking for a PLAGL1 fusion in supratentorial cases of non-ZFTA/non-YAP1 ependymomas; and 3/ the usefulness of PLAGL1 FISH.

Ependymomas (EPN) are central nervous system neoplasms that exhibit an ependymal phenotype. In particular, supratentorial EPN (ST-EPN) must be differentiated from more aggressive entities such as glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype. This task is frequently addressed with the use of immunohistochemistry coupled with clinical presentation and morphological features. Here we describe the case of a young adult presenting with migraine-like symptoms and a temporoinsular-based expansile mass that was first diagnosed as a GBM, mostly based on strong and diffuse oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2 (OLIG2) expression. Molecular characterization revealed a ZFTA::RELA fusion, supporting the diagnosis of ST-EPN, ZFTA fusion-positive. OLIG2 expression is rarely reported in tumors other than GBM and oligodendrocyte-lineage committed neoplasms. The patient was treated with radiotherapy and temozolomide after surgery and was alive and well at follow-up. This report illustrates the need to assess immunostains within a broader clinical, morphological and molecular context to avoid premature exclusion of important differential diagnoses.

Long-term outcome after surgical treatment of supratentorial ependymoma (STE) in children has not been extensively reported.

We identified 26 children who underwent primary tumor resection of STE between 1953 and 2011, with at least 8 years follow-up. Ten patients (38%) had anaplastic and 16 had low grade ependymoma. Four of 15 children (26%) treated in the years 1953-1976 survived more than 5 years, but the observed 10-year survival was only 7%. One patient lived for 37 years, and second surgery for a local recurrent lesion disclosed a glioblastoma, possibly secondary to radiotherapy. In contrast, the observed 5-year survival rate for 11 children treated in the years 1992-2011 was 8/11 (73%) and observed 10- and 25-year survival rates were 70% and 66%, respectively. Eight patients were alive and tumor-free with follow-up periods of 8-27 (median 18) years, all treated after 1992. Five of these long-term survivors were 23-39 years old with full-time (n = 3) or part-time (n = 2) work. The last three patients were still children (9-12 years old): one with good function and two with major neurological deficits. The majority of patients (n = 18) received adjuvant radiotherapy and eight children no adjuvant treatment. Repeated resections for residual or recurrent tumor were necessary in 11 patients (42%), mostly due to local disease with progressive clinical symptoms. Eight patients underwent only one repeat resection, whereas three patients had two or more repeat resections within 18 years after initial surgery. Four patients were tumor-free after repeated resections at the latest follow-up, 2-13 years after last surgery.

Pediatric STE has a marked risk for local recurrence even after gross total resection and postoperative radiotherapy, but survival has increased following the introduction of modern treatment in recent years. Repeated surgery is an important part of treatment and may lead to persistent tumor control.

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, established new approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading, emphasizing the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. This edition increased the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification while still relying on other established approaches such as histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, it introduced new tumor types and subtypes based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. Over the past decade, molecular techniques identified numerous key genetic alterations in CSN tumors, with important implications regarding the understanding of pathogenesis but also for prognosis and the development and application of effective molecularly targeted therapies. This review summarizes the major changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification of pediatric CNS tumors, highlighting for each entity the molecular alterations and other information that are relevant for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic purposes and that patients' and oncologists' need from a pathology report.

Cellular myofibroma is a rare subtype of myofibroma that was first described in 2017. Its diagnosis is often challenging because of its relative rarity, lack of known genetic abnormalities, and expression of muscle markers that can be confused with sarcomas that have myogenic differentiation. Currently, scholars have limited knowledge of this disease, and published cases are few. Further accumulation of diagnostic and treatment experiences is required.

A 16-year-old girl experienced left upper limb swelling for 3 years. She sought medical attention at a local hospital 10 months ago, where magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 5-cm soft tissue mass. Needle biopsy performed at a local hospital resulted in the diagnosis of a spindle cell soft tissue sarcoma. The patient was referred to our hospital for limb salvage surgery with endoprosthetic replacement. She was initially diagnosed with a synovial sarcoma. Consequently, clinical management with chemotherapy was continued for the malignant sarcoma. Our pathology department also performed fluorescence in situ hybridization for result validation, which returned negative for SS18 gene breaks, indicating that it was not a synovial sarcoma. Next-generation sequencing was used to identify the SRF-RELA rearrangement. The final pathological diagnosis was a cellular/myofibroblastic neoplasm with an SRF-RELA gene fusion. The patient had initially received two courses of chemotherapy; however, chemotherapy was discontinued after the final diagnosis.

This case was misdiagnosed because of its rare occurrence, benign biological behavior, and pathological similarity to soft tissue sarcoma.

Ependymomas comprise biologically distinct tumor types with respect to age distribution, (epi)genetics, localization, and prognosis. Multimodal risk-stratification, including histopathological and molecular features, is essential in these biologically defined tumor types. Gross total resection (GTR), achieved with intraoperative monitoring and neuronavigation, and if necessary, second-look surgery, is the most effective treatment. Adjuvant radiation therapy is mandatory in high-risk tumors and in case of residual tumor. There is yet growing evidence that some ependymal tumors may be cured by surgery alone. To date, the role of chemotherapy is unclear and subject of current studies.Even though standard therapy can achieve reasonable survival rates for the majority of ependymoma patients, long-term follow-up still reveals a high probability of relapse in certain biological entities.With increasing knowledge of biologically distinct tumor types, risk-adapted adjuvant therapy gains importance. Beyond initial tumor control, and avoidance of therapy-induced morbidity for low-risk patients, intensified treatment for high-risk patients comprises another challenge. With identification of specific risk features regarding molecular alterations, targeted therapy may represent an option for individualized treatment modalities in the future.

The fifth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System has identified many new tumor types and has established, for the first time, essential and desirable diagnostic criteria for each of them. Among these, genetic alterations play an important role associated with morphology. For the first time, epigenetic data can also constitute essential and/or desirable criteria. These genetic abnormalities can be fusions, deletions or gains/amplifications and can thus be detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. The purpose of this article is to present the advantages and limitations of this technique in reference to its specific use within neuro-oncopathology in light of the 2021 WHO classification.

Accurate identification of brain tumor molecular subgroups is increasingly important. We aimed to establish the most accurate and reproducible ependymoma subgroup biomarker detection techniques, across 147 cases from International Society of Pediatric Oncology (SIOP) Ependymoma II trial participants, enrolled in the pan-European "Biomarkers of Ependymoma in Children and Adolescents (BIOMECA)" study.

Across 6 European BIOMECA laboratories, we evaluated epigenetic profiling (DNA methylation array); immunohistochemistry (IHC) for nuclear p65-RELA, H3K27me3, and Tenascin-C; copy number analysis via fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and MLPA (1q, CDKN2A), and MIP and DNA methylation array (genome-wide copy number evaluation); analysis of ZFTA- and YAP1-fusions by RT-PCR and sequencing, Nanostring and break-apart FISH.

DNA Methylation profiling classified 65.3% (n = 96/147) of cases as EPN-PFA and 15% (n = 22/147) as ST-ZFTA fusion-positive. Immunohistochemical loss of H3K27me3 was a reproducible and accurate surrogate marker for EPN-PFA (sensitivity 99%-100% across 3 centers). IHC for p65-RELA, FISH, and RNA-based analyses effectively identified ZFTA- and YAP-fused supratentorial ependymomas. Detection of 1q gain using FISH exhibited only 57% inter-center concordance and low sensitivity and specificity while MIP, MLPA, and DNA methylation-based approaches demonstrated greater accuracy.

We confirm, in a prospective trial cohort, that H3K27me3 immunohistochemistry is a robust EPN-PFA biomarker. Tenascin-C should be abandoned as a PFA marker. DNA methylation and MIP arrays are effective tools for copy number analysis of 1q gain, 6q, and CDKN2A loss while FISH is inadequate. Fusion detection was successful, but rare novel fusions need more extensive technologies. Finally, we propose test sets to guide future diagnostic approaches.

Since our last Special Annual Issue dedicated to the topic of ependymoma in 2009, critical advancements have been made in the understanding of this disease which is largely confined to childhood. In the era of molecular profiling, the prior classification of ependymoma based on histology has become largely irrelevant, with multiple new subtypes of this disease now being described in the newest 2021 WHO CNS Tumor Classification System. Despite our advancements in understanding the underlying biology of these tumors, the mainstays of treatment-gross total surgical resection followed by confocal radiation therapy-have continued to yield the best treatment results across multiple studies and centers. Here, we provide an update on our understanding of the advancements made in tumor biology, surgical, and oncologic management of this disease. As we move into an era of more personalized medicine, it is critical to reflect on our historical understanding of different disease entities, to better understand the future directions of our treatments.

Lipogenic differentiation in ependymoma is an infrequent occurrence with very few reported cases. The grading was done solely based on the histomorphology and molecular subtyping was not described in such ependymomas. New molecular classification divided ependymomas in nine different subgroups, of which supratentorial location tumor usually exhibits C11orf95-RELA, YAP1-MAMLD1, and YAP1-FAM118B fusion proteins. A 46-year-old female presented with headache and right-sided parapresis. Radilogy revealed a large intraxial left parietooccipital mass lesion, which histologically and immuohistochemically confirmed as anaplastic ependymoma with extensive lipogenic changes. The ependymal origin of the tumor was corroborated by the immunohistochemistry and ultrastructural studies. Molecular studies for C11orf95-RELA, YAP1-MAMLD1, and YAP1-FAM118B fusion proteins were negative. This is the first documentation of fusion negative supratentorial anaplastic ependymoma with lipogenic differentiation. This novel finding needs further reinforcement by similar studies to identify its impact on the disease outcome.

Modern day survivorship from childhood malignancies is estimated to be over 80%. However, central nervous system tumors remain the leading cause of cancer mortality in children and is the most common solid tumor in this population. Improved survivorship is, in part, a result of improved multidisciplinary care, often with a combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic therapy. With improved survival, long term effects of treatment and quality of life impacts have been recognized and pose a challenge to maximize the therapeutic ratio of treatment. It has been increasingly more apparent that precise risk stratification, such as with the inclusion of molecular classification, is instrumental in efforts to tailor radiotherapy for appropriate treatment, generally towards de-intensification for this vulnerable patient population. In addition, advances in radiotherapy techniques have allowed greater conformality and accuracy of treatment for those who do require radiotherapy for tumor control. Ongoing efforts to tailor radiotherapy, including de-escalation, omission, or intensification of radiotherapy, continue to improve as increasing insight into tumor heterogeneity is recognized, coupled with advances in precision medicine employing novel molecularly-targeted therapeutics.

Biological subtypes of ependymoma (EPN) have been introduced by the recent WHO classification and appear to have great impact on the clinical course, but have not yet found their way into clinical risk stratification. Further, the overall unfavorable prognosis underlines the fact that current therapeutic strategies need further evaluation for improvement. To date, there is no international consensus regarding first-line treatment for children with intracranial EPN. Extent of resection is known to be the most important clinical risk factor, leading to the consensus that consequent evaluation for re-surgery of postoperative residual tumor needs to have highest priority. Furthermore, efficacy of local irradiation is unquestioned and recommended for patients aged>1 year. In contrast, efficacy of chemotherapy is still under discussion. The European trial SIOP Ependymoma II aims at evaluating efficacy of different chemotherapy elements, leading to the recommendation to include German patients. The BIOMECA study, as biological accompanying study, aims at identifying new prognostic parameters. These results might help to develop targeted therapies for unfavorable biological subtypes. For patient who are not qualified for inclusion into the interventional strata, the HIT-MED Guidance 5.2 provides specific recommendations. This article is meant as an overview of national guidelines regarding diagnostics and treatment as well as of treatment according to the SIOP Ependymoma II trial protocol.

New tumor types are continuously being described with advances in molecular testing and genomic analysis resulting in better prognostics, new targeted therapy options and improved patient outcomes. As a result of these advances, pathological classification of tumors is periodically updated with new editions of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Tumors books. In 2021, WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System, 5^th edition (CNS5), was published with major changes in pediatric brain tumors officially recognized including pediatric gliomas being separated from adult gliomas, ependymomas being categorized based on anatomical compartment and many new tumor types, most of them seen in children. Additional general changes, such as tumor grading now being done within tumor types rather than across entities and changes in definition of glioblastoma, are also relevant to pediatric neuro-oncology practice. The purpose of this manuscript is to highlight the major changes in pediatric brain tumors in CNS5 most relevant to radiologists. Additionally, brief descriptions of newly recognized entities will be presented with a focus on imaging findings.

Review of the clinicopathologic and genetic features of early ependymal tumor with MN1-BEND2 fusion (EET MN1-BEND2), classical astroblastomas, and recently described related pediatric CNS tumors. I also briefly review general mechanisms of gene expression silencing by DNA methylation and chromatin remodeling, and genomic DNA methylation profiling as a powerful new tool for CNS tumor classification.

Literature review and illustration of tumor histopathologic features and prenatal gene expression timelines.

Astroblastoma, originally descried by Bailey and Cushing in 1926, has been an enigmatic tumor. Whether they are of ependymal or astrocytic derivation was argued for decades. Recent genetic evidence supports existence of both ependymal and astrocytic astroblastoma-like tumors. Studies have shown that tumors exhibiting astroblastoma-like histology can be classified into discrete entities based on their genomic DNA methylation profiles, gene expression, and in some cases, the presence of unique gene fusions. One such tumor, EET MN1-BEND2 occurs mostly in female children, and has an overall very good prognosis with surgical management. It contains a gene fusion comprised of portions of the MN1 gene at chromosomal location 22q12.1 and the BEND2 gene at Xp22.13. Other emerging pediatric CNS tumor entities demonstrating ependymal or astroblastoma-like histological features also harbor gene fusions involving chromosome X, 11q22 and 22q12 breakpoint regions.

Genomic DNA profiling has facilitated discovery of several new CNS tumor entities, however, traditional methods, such as immunohistochemistry, DNA or RNA sequencing, and cytogenetic studies, including fluorescence in situ hybridization, remain necessary for their accurate biological classification and diagnosis.

Periodic updates to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for central nervous system (CNS) tumors reflect advances in the pathological diagnosis, categorization, and molecular underpinnings of primary brain, spinal cord, and peripheral nerve tumors. The 5th edition of the WHO Classification of CNS Tumors was published in 2021. This review discusses the guiding principles of the revision, introduces the more common new diagnostic entities, and describes tumor classification and nomenclature changes that are relevant for pediatric neurological surgeons.

Revisions to the WHO CNS tumor classification system introduced new diagnostic entities, restructured and renamed other entities with particular impact in the diffuse gliomas and CNS embryonal tumors, and expanded the requirements for incorporating both molecular and histological features of CNS tumors into a unified integrated diagnosis. Many of the new diagnostic entities occur at least occasionally in pediatric patients and will thus be encountered by pediatric neurosurgeons. New nomenclature impacts the terminology that is applied in communication between pathologists, surgeons, clinicians, and patients. Requirements for molecular information in tumor diagnosis are expected to refine diagnostic categories while also introducing practical considerations for intraoperative consultation, preliminary histological evaluation, and triaging of neurosurgical tissue samples for histology, molecular testing, and clinical trial requirements.

Pediatric brain tumor diagnosis and clinical management are a multidisciplinary effort that is rapidly advancing in the molecular era. Interdisciplinary collaboration is critical for providing the best care for pediatric CNS tumor patients. Pediatric neurosurgeons and their local neuropathologists and neuro-oncologists must work collaboratively to put the most current CNS tumor diagnostic guidelines into standard practice.

Intracranial tumors in the first year of life are rare and, in this age group, are the second most common type of pediatric cancer after leukemias. As the more common solid tumor in neonates and infants, they present some peculiarities such as the high incidence of malignancies. Routine ultrasonography made easier to detect intrauterine tumors, but diagnosis can be delayed due to the lack or scarcity of recognizable symptoms. These neoplasms are often very large and highly vascular. Their removal is challenging, and there is a higher rate of morbidity and mortality than seen in older children, adolescents, and adults. They also differ from older children with respect to location, histological features, clinical behavior, and management. Pediatric low-grade gliomas represent 30% of the tumors in this age group and comprise circumscribed and diffuse tumors. They are followed by medulloblastoma and ependymoma. Other non-medulloblastoma embryonal neoplasms, former known as PNETS, are also commonly diagnosed in neonates and infants. Teratomas have an expressive incidence in newborns but decline gradually until the end of the first year of life. Immunohistochemical, molecular, and genomic advances are impacting the understanding and targeting of the treatment of some tumors, but, despite all these advances, the extent of resection remains the most important factor in the prognosis and survival of almost all types of tumors. The outcome is difficult to estimate, and 5-year survival ranges from one-quarter to three-quarters of the patients.

Ependymal neoplasms are a heterogenous group of neoplasms arising from the progenitors of the cells lining the ventricular system and the spinal central canal. During the last few years, significant novel data concerning oncogenesis, molecular characteristics and clinical correlations of these tumours have been collected, with a strong relevance for their pathological classification. The recently published 5th edition of WHO Classification of Central Nervous System Tumours integrates this novel knowledge and represents a substantial update compared to the previous edition. Concerning supratentorial ependymomas, the previous RELA fusion-positive ependymoma has been renamed into ZFTA fusion-positive and the novel YAP1 fusion-positive ependymoma subtype has been added. Posterior fossa ependymomas should now be allocated either to the Type A or Type B subtypes based on molecular profiling or using the H3 K27me3 immunohistochemical surrogate. Regarding spinal ependymomas, a novel subtype has been added based on a distinctive molecular trait, presence of MYCN amplification, and on the unfavourable outcome. Finally, myxopapillary ependymoma is now classified as a grade 2 tumour in accordance with its overall prognosis which mirrors that of conventional spinal ependymomas. The aim of this review is to present these changes and summarize the current diagnostic framework of ependymal tumours, according to the most recent updates.

Advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of central nervous system (CNS) tumors prompted a new World Health Organization (WHO) classification scheme in 2021, only 5 years after the prior iteration. The 2016 version was the first to include specific molecular alterations in the diagnoses of a few tumors, but the 2021 system greatly expanded this approach, with over 40 tumor types and subtypes now being defined by their key molecular features. Many tumors have also been reconceptualized into new "supercategories," including adult-type diffuse gliomas, pediatric-type diffuse low- and high-grade gliomas, and circumscribed astrocytic gliomas. Some entirely new tumors are in this scheme, particularly pediatric tumors. Naturally, these changes will impact how CNS tumor patients are diagnosed and treated, including clinical trial enrollment. This review addresses the most clinically relevant changes in the 2021 WHO book, including diffuse and circumscribed gliomas, ependymomas, embryonal tumors, and meningiomas.

Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumour (DNT) is a glioneuronal tumour that is challenging to diagnose, with a wide spectrum of histological features. Three histopathological patterns have been described: specific DNTs (both the simple form and the complex form) comprising the specific glioneuronal element, and also the non-specific/diffuse form which lacks it, and has unclear phenotype-genotype correlations with numerous differential diagnoses.

We used targeted methods (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridisation and targeted sequencing) and large-scale genomic methodologies including DNA methylation profiling to perform an integrative analysis to better characterise a large retrospective cohort of 82 DNTs, enriched for tumours that showed progression on imaging.

We confirmed that specific DNTs are characterised by a single driver event with a high frequency of FGFR1 variants. However, a subset of DNA methylation-confirmed DNTs harbour alternative genomic alterations to FGFR1 duplication/mutation. We also demonstrated that a subset of DNTs sharing the same FGFR1 alterations can show in situ progression. In contrast to the specific forms, "non-specific/diffuse DNTs" corresponded to a heterogeneous molecular group encompassing diverse, newly-described, molecularly distinct entities.

Specific DNT is a homogeneous group of tumours sharing characteristics of paediatric low-grade gliomas: a quiet genome with a recurrent genomic alteration in the RAS-MAPK signalling pathway, a distinct DNA methylation profile and a good prognosis but showing progression in some cases. The "non-specific/diffuse DNTs" subgroup encompasses various recently described histomolecular entities, such as PLNTY and diffuse astrocytoma, MYB or MYBL1 altered.

Radiation treatment is widely used to address unresectable intracranial tumors. Owing to the nature of therapy, healthy tissue and diseased regions will be affected. New insights have shown that not only does this impact brain parenchyma but it causes changes in fluid status, myelination, and the integrity of the blood-brain barrier. This alters how peripheral and central immune systems interact, perpetuating neuroinflammation. Rare case reports in the adult literature have described multifocal, multiphasic demyelinating lesions after radiation. Here we describe 2 pediatric cases of relapsing demyelination after and in conjunction with radiation therapy for ependymoma, consistent with a multiple sclerosis phenotype. Insights into the underpinnings of multiple sclerosis show peripheral inflammation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and antigenic mimicry stimulating neuroinflammation. Here we investigate the role that radiation, tumor burden, and systemic inflammation may play in creating demyelinating disorders. We strive to elucidate common pathophysiology between radiation-induced brain injury and multiple sclerosis.

- Supratentorial ependymomas (STEs) are an aggressive group of ependymoma, topographically distinct from their posterior fossa and spinal counterparts. ZFTA fusion-positive cases have been reported to account for the majority of STEs, although data on its association with poorer outcomes is inconsistent.

- We assessed the prevalence of the ZFTA-fusion by RT PCR and FISH in a cohort of 61 patients (68 samples) with STE. Our primary outcome was to determine the role of the ZFTA-fusion on progression-free and overall survival of patients with STE. Our secondary objectives were to assess the impact of ZFTA-fusion on NF-kB pathway signalling via surrogate markers of this pathway, namely COX-2, CCND1 and L1CAM.

- ZFTA-fusion was noted in 21.3% of STEs in our cohort. The presence of this rearrangement did not significantly impact the PFS or OS of patients with STEs and was not associated with upregulation of markers of the NF-kB pathway. Only gross total resection was significantly associated with better progression-free survival.

- In contradiction to prior reports from across the world, the ZFTA-fusion is far less prevalent among our population. It does not appear to drive NF-kB signaling or significantly affect outcomes. Gross total resection (GTR) must be attempted in all cases of STE and adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy employed when GTR is not achieved.

The 2021 WHO classification stratifies ependymoma (EPN) into nine molecular subgroups according to the anatomic locations which outperforms histological grading. We aimed at molecularly reclassifying 200 EPN using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and sequencing for ZFTA fusions in supratentorial (ST) EPN. Further, we assessed the utility of L1CAM, cyclinD1, and p65 markers in identifying ZFTA fusion. Demographic profiles, histologic features, molecular subgroups and clinical outcome were retrospectively analyzed. IHC for L1CAM, cyclinD1, p65, H3K27me3, and H3K27M and sequencing for ZFTA fusion were performed. ZFTA fusions were identified in 44.8% ST EPN. p65 displayed the highest specificity (93.8%), while L1CAM had the highest sensitivity (92.3%) in detecting ZFTA fusions. The negative predictive value approached 96.6% and sensitivity improved to 96.2% with combinatorial IHC (L1CAM, cyclinD1, p65). H3K27me3 loss (PF-A) was noted in 65% PF EPN. Our results provide evidence that a combination of two of three (L1CAM, p65, and cyclinD1) can be used as surrogate markers for predicting fusion. ZFTA fusion, and its surrogate markers in ST, and H3K27me3 and younger age (< 5 years) in PF showed significant correlation with PFS and OS on univariate and Kaplan-Meier analysis. On multivariate analysis, H3K27me3 loss and younger age group are associated with poor clinical outcome.

The central nervous system (CNS) tumors constitute the most common type of solid tumors in the pediatric population. The cerebral and cerebellar parenchyma are the most common site of pediatric CNS neoplasms. Imaging plays an important role in detection, characterization, staging and prognostication of brain tumors. The focus of the current article is pediatric brain tumor imaging with emphasis on pearls and pitfalls of conventional and advanced imaging in various pediatric brain tumor subtypes. The article also elucidates changes in brain tumor terms and entities as applicable to pediatric patients, updated as per World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification of primary CNS tumors. This classification introduced the genetic and/or molecular information of primary CNS neoplasms as part of comprehensive tumor pathology report in the routine clinical workflow. The concepts from 2016 classification have been further refined based on current research, by the Consortium to Inform Molecular and Practical Approaches to CNS Tumor Taxonomy (cIMPACT-NOW) group and published in the form of updates. The updates serve as guidelines in the time interval between WHO updates and expect to be broadly adopted in the subsequent WHO classification. The current review covers most pediatric brain tumors except pituitary tumors, meningeal origin tumors, nerve sheath tumors and CNS lymphoma/leukemia.

Ependymomas (EPN) are commonly encountered brain tumors in the pediatric population. They may arise in the supratentorial compartment, posterior fossa and spinal cord. Histopathologic grading of EPN has always been challenging with poor interobserver reproducibility and lack of correlation between histologic grade and patient outcomes. Recent studies have highlighted that, despite histopathological similarities among variants of EPN at different anatomical sites, they possess site-specific genetic and epigenetic alterations, transcriptional profiles and DNA copy number variations. This has led to a molecular and location-based classification for EPN which has been adopted by the World Health Organization Classification of Central Nervous System Tumors and more accurately risk-stratifies patients than histopathologic grading alone. Given the complexity of this evolving field, the purpose of this paper is to offer a practical approach to the diagnosis of EPN, including the selection of the most appropriate molecular surrogate immunohistochemical stains, basic molecular studies and more sophisticated techniques if needed. The goal is to reach a rapid, sound diagnosis, providing essential information regarding prognosis and guiding clinical decision-making.

Ependymomas encompass a heterogeneous group of central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms that occur along the entire neuroaxis. In recent years, extensive (epi-)genomic profiling efforts have identified several molecular groups of ependymoma that are characterized by distinct molecular alterations and/or patterns. Based on unsupervised visualization of a large cohort of genome-wide DNA methylation data, we identified a highly distinct group of pediatric-type tumors (n = 40) forming a cluster separate from all established CNS tumor types, of which a high proportion were histopathologically diagnosed as ependymoma. RNA sequencing revealed recurrent fusions involving the pleomorphic adenoma gene-like 1 (PLAGL1) gene in 19 of 20 of the samples analyzed, with the most common fusion being EWSR1:PLAGL1 (n = 13). Five tumors showed a PLAGL1:FOXO1 fusion and one a PLAGL1:EP300 fusion. High transcript levels of PLAGL1 were noted in these tumors, with concurrent overexpression of the imprinted genes H19 and IGF2, which are regulated by PLAGL1. Histopathological review of cases with sufficient material (n = 16) demonstrated a broad morphological spectrum of tumors with predominant ependymoma-like features. Immunohistochemically, tumors were GFAP positive and OLIG2- and SOX10 negative. In 3/16 of the cases, a dot-like positivity for EMA was detected. All tumors in our series were located in the supratentorial compartment. Median age of the patients at the time of diagnosis was 6.2 years. Median progression-free survival was 35 months (for 11 patients with data available). In summary, our findings suggest the existence of a novel group of supratentorial neuroepithelial tumors that are characterized by recurrent PLAGL1 fusions and enriched for pediatric patients.