Studies in adults have demonstrated a risk for allograft rejection or development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We examined the incidence of acute rejection and de novo DSA following COVID-19 vaccination or infection among pediatric kidney transplant patients.

Retrospective analysis of 23 pediatric kidney transplant recipients without prior history of rejection, DSA, or COVID-19 infection who received the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Risk for rejection was evaluated via monitoring of serum creatinine, DSA, and donor-derived cell-free DNA per center protocol. Results concerning for rejection prompted allograft biopsy, graded by the Banff classification system.

Eight of 23 (34.8%) received two doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine, 15 (65.3%) received three doses. Two (8.7%) had rejection; one with de novo DSA, another without. There was no difference in the number of doses of COVID-19 vaccine received in those with rejection vs. no rejection (p = 0.53). 13 (56.5%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, with no difference in the number of vaccines received between those infected with COVID-19 vs. those who were not (p = 0.69). No adjustments were made to the maintenance immunosuppression during SARS-CoV-2 infection, and there was no evidence of rejection or DSA formation after infection. Median follow-up time was 29.9 months (IQR 25.0-33.4 months) after the first vaccine dose.

In our small single-center cohort, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination or infection is unlikely to increase the risk for rejection or de novo DSA in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Larger prospective studies with a control group are needed to further understand the immune effects of the COVID-19 vaccine and disease in this population.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant mortality and morbidity, especially in renal transplant recipients. The mortality and hospitalization rate of COVID-19 infected transplant recipients is much higher than in the healthy population. Although progress has been made in the management of COVID-19 in renal transplant recipients, there are still unexplained clinical differences among patients. We think that cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection may also play a role in this clinical difference in COVID-19 infected transplant recipients. For this purpose, we aimed to screen for the presence of CMV viremia or infection in kidney transplant patient groups who were and were not diagnosed with COVID-19 in the last year.

We included 191 consecutive kidney transplant recipients followed in our transplant clinic. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had COVID-19 infection or not in the last 1 year. CMV DNA levels were tested in the whole patients' groups. We compared CMV positivity rates in patients with and without COVID-19.

There were 83 patients who had COVID-19 and 108 patients who did not. Whereas CMV viremia was detected in 15 transplant recipients with COVID-19 infection, CMV viremia was detected in 4 patients who did not have COVID-19 (P = .001, logistic regression = 4.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1328-17,103; Figure 1).There was no difference in terms of immunosuppressive therapy, steroid use, duration, and type of transplantation. The COVID-19 negative and positive groups were similar in lymphocyte and leukocyte counts (Table 1). In the multivariate analysis, CMV positivity was found to be positively associated with COVID-19 infection but lymphocyte count and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were found to be independently and negatively correlated.

CMV infection may accompany COVID-19 or may occur in the post-COVID-19 period. It can cause increased morbidity and mortality. Routine screening and early treatment for CMV may reduce mortality in high-risk group.

In kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), immune monitoring of peripheral lymphocyte subsets (PLS) reflects the real immune status and aids in the diagnosis of the occurrence and development of infectious diseases, including COVID-19. Exploring the PLS of COVID-19 pneumonia in KTRs is important.

In this study, a total of 103 KTRs were divided into mild pneumonia (MP) and severe pneumonia (SP) groups, as well as a stable group. The clinical information and PLS data were assessed via t or Mann-Whitney test and receiver operating curve analysis. Logistic regression was employed to identify the risk factors, and Spearman's correlation analysis was used to identify correlations.

Lymphopenia is a common manifestation of COVID-19 in KTRs, and it is positively related to the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia. The CD3 + T-cell count had the highest AUC between the MP and the SP. Multiple PLS measures were found to be independent risk factors for COVID-19 pneumonia progression in KTRs.

This study revealed a robust correlation between PLS and severe COVID-19 pneumonia progression in KTRs. PLS monitoring could facilitate real-time diagnosis and therapy for infection, as well as timely and precisive adjustment of immunosuppression instructions, for KTRs with COVID-19.

Immunocompromised hosts, which encompass a diverse population of persons with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus disease, solid organ, and hematologic transplants, autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, bear a significant burden of the morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Immunocompromised patients who develop COVID-19 have a more severe illness, higher hospitalization rates, and higher mortality rates than immunocompetent patients. There are no well-defined treatment strategies that are specific to immunocompromised patients and vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma are variably effective. This review focuses on the specific impact of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients and the gaps in knowledge that require further study.

COVID-19 disease burden has been mitigated by vaccination; however, concerns persist regarding weakened immune responses in liver transplant (LT) recipients. This study investigates COVID-19 outcomes in LT recipients based on vaccination status.

This single-center retrospective study identified LT recipients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19 infection from 03/01/2020 to 07/31/2023. Logistic regression analyses were conducted, adjusting for age, race, co-morbidities, number of immunosuppressive agents, and infection date.

Of 1,787 registered LT recipients, 361 had confirmed COVID-19 infection. Of those, 136 were unvaccinated and 225 were vaccinated. 13% had 1 vaccine dose, 31% had 2 vaccine doses, and 56% had 3 vaccine doses prior to infection. Logistic regression found higher mortality (p = 0.001) and hospitalization (p = 0.016) rates for older recipients, while those with 3 or more vaccine doses had lower mortality (p = 0.039) and hospitalization (p = 0.008) rates. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) increased risk of hospitalization (p < 0.001). Adjusting for the date when the Omicron variant became locally predominant, the protective effect from 3 or more vaccine doses declined to an OR (95% CI) of 0.58 (0.15-2.23), p = 0.39.

Three or more COVID-19 vaccine doses could decrease mortality for LT recipients, particularly older recipients and those with CKD. These individuals may benefit from vaccination and other interventions.

Mass COVID-19 vaccination is mandated in vulnerable populations in our renal transplant waitlist cohort. However, the anti-human leukocyte antigen (anti-HLA) profile after COVID-19 vaccination is controversial, and the side effects are yet to be discerned.

To evaluate the status of HLA antibodies in waitlisted renal transplant patients before and 3 weeks after each vaccination and if comorbidities are associated with the HLA antibody profile.

A total of 59 waitlisted kidney transplant patients were included in this study. The anti-HLA antibodies were analyzed before and 6 months after their last COVID-19 vaccination. The mean fluorescence intensity change in the anti-HLA antibody levels was used to classify patients into 3 groups: high inducers, low inducers, and noninducers.

There were significant HLA antibody profile changes after COVID-19 vaccination, showing 21 antibodies generated against HLA class I antigens and 7 against HLA class II antigens to their baseline. Compared with the noninducers, the high and low inducers showed a higher prevalence of COVID-19 infection, COVID-19 vaccine type, and background hypertension history.

Our data suggest that COVID-19 vaccination propagates anti-HLA class I and II antibodies for waitlisted renal transplant patients. The clinical significance of these antibodies needs further study. Furthermore, comorbidities, such as history of COVID-19 infection and hypertension, supplemented this effect. Anti-HLA antibody monitoring may be warranted in COVID-19 vaccinated, waitlisted renal transplant patients with a history of COVID-19 infection and/or hypertension.

Patients who have undergone solid organ transplantation are at an elevated risk of severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) because of post-transplantation immunosuppressive therapy. However, optimization of vaccination, modification of immunosuppression, and implementation of monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy in transplant recipients with COVID-19 is uncertain.

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on patients who underwent liver or kidney transplants and were diagnosed with COVID-19. The association of several vaccine doses, mycophenolate therapy, and mAB therapy with mortality outcomes after COVID-19 diagnosis (3 and 6 months), hospitalization, and length of hospital stay were assessed.

This study included 255 patients with a median age of 59 (23-89) were included. Many COVID-19 vaccine doses were not associated with any outcome; however, patients with a liver transplanted with mycophenolate had higher 3-month (19% vs. 0%; p = 0.02) and 6-month (21% vs. 0%; p = 0.01) mortality rates than those who did not. In addition, transplant recipients who received mAb therapy for COVID-19 were less likely to be hospitalized (37% vs. 68%; p < 0.001).

For organ transplant recipients with COVID-19, vaccination alone may not be an optimal strategy for preventing serious outcomes. Rather, the types of organ transplant, immunosuppressive therapy (particularly mycophenolate), and COVID-19 treatment strategy should be synergistically considered to promote an optimal therapeutic dynamic for a vulnerable population.

This study investigates the impact of varying degrees of immunosuppression on the clinical outcomes of immunocompromised individuals, particularly those with autoimmune diseases or post-solid organ transplant statuses, in the context of COVID-19. By focusing on these highly vulnerable populations, the study underscores the significant health inequalities faced by immunocompromised patients, who experience disproportionately worse outcomes in comparison to the general population.

A retrospective cohort analysis of the K-COV-N dataset was conducted, comparing the effects of immunosuppression in autoimmune and transplant groups with matched control groups. Propensity score matching was employed to minimize inequalities in baseline characteristics, ensuring a more equitable comparison between immunocompromised and non-immunocompromised individuals. Outcomes included COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality, 28-day mortality, ICU admissions, and the need for respiratory support among 323,890 adults in the Republic of Korea. Patients with cancer or other immunosuppressive conditions, such as HIV, were excluded. Subgroup analyses assessed the influence of specific immunosuppressive medications and vaccination extent.

Significantly elevated in-hospital mortality was found for patients with autoimmune diseases (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 2.749) and transplant recipients (aOR 7.567), with similar patterns in other outcomes. High-dose steroid use and a greater number of immunosuppressant medications markedly increased the risk of poor outcomes. Vaccination emerged as a protective factor, with a single dose substantially improving outcomes for autoimmune patients and at least two doses necessary for transplant recipients.

Immunocompromised patients, particularly those with autoimmune diseases and transplant recipients, are highly vulnerable to severe COVID-19 outcomes. High-dose steroid use and multiple immunosuppressants further increase risks. Vaccination significantly improves outcomes, with at least one dose benefiting autoimmune patients and two doses necessary for transplant recipients. Personalized vaccination schedules based on immunosuppression levels are essential to mitigate healthcare inequalities and improve outcomes, particularly in underserved populations, informing both clinical and public health strategies.

Although COVID-19 is no longer a declared global health emergency, data remain limited on the impact of COVID-19 in lung transplant recipients.

We identified lung transplant recipients who were diagnosed with COVID-19 from March 2020 through August 2022 in our institutional database and investigated clinical outcomes. We then analyzed outcomes based on date of COVID-19 diagnosis (first wave March 2020-October 2020; second wave November 2020-2021; third wave December 2021-September 2022) and compared these results.

Of the 210 lung transplant recipients (median age 67; 67% men) enrolled, 140 (67%) required hospital admission. Among admitted recipients, 35 (25%) were intubated and 7 (5%) were placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Overall survival was 67.1% at 1 y and 59.0% at 2 y post-COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19 led to mortality in all 5 patients diagnosed during their index admission for lung transplantation. Although overall survival was significantly better in recipients with COVID-19 during the third wave, in-hospital mortality remained high (first wave 28%, second wave 38%, and 28% third wave). Vaccination (partially vaccinated versus none and fully vaccinated versus none) was the only significant protective factor for hospital admission, and age 70 y and older and partially vaccinated (versus none or fully vaccinated) were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Overall survival after COVID-19 infection in lung transplant recipients continues to improve; however, in-hospital mortality remains remarkably high. Vaccination appears to have been impactful in preventing hospital admission, but its impact on in-hospital mortality is still unclear. Further research is needed to better identify lung transplant recipients at high risk for mortality from COVID-19.

Fortunately, much has been studied about COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Evidence suggests that these patients do not appear to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19. However, there are still some uncertainties regarding the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated diseases.

This study aimed to describe the main symptoms of COVID-19 and their frequency in IBD patients and evaluate the impact of the IBD therapeutic drugs on clinical presentation of COVID-19 and to determine factors associated with COVID-19 in this population.

Adult patients with IBD from three tertiary-care public, teaching hospitals in Ceará, Northeastern Brazil, were evaluated during one scheduled appointment from March to December 2020. Patients with possible or confirmed COVID-19 were compared with patients without COVID-19. Furthermore, incidences of each symptom were evaluated based on the use of IBD therapeutic drugs.

A total of 515 patients with IBD were included in the study: 234 with CD, and 281 with UC. Of these, 174 patients (34%) had possible/confirmed COVID-19 of whom 156 (90%) were symptomatic. Main symptoms were fever (65%) and headache (65%); gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in one third of patients and were higher than COVID-19 in general population. The factors associated with having COVID-19 were female gender (OR 1.71, 95%CI: 1.17-2.50); contact at home (OR 5.07, 95%CI: 3.31-7.78) and outside the home (OR 3.14, 95%CI: 2.10-4.71) with a case of COVID-19; work outside of the home (OR 1.87, 95%CI: 1.26-2.78); family history of COVID-19 (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.58-3.33) use of salicylate (OR 1.71, 95%CI: 1.17-4.28); and asthma (OR 7.10, 95%CI: 1.46-34.57).

IBD patients at high risk of COVID-19 infection may need to avoid salicylate therapy but further studies are necessary to confirm this association.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are at an elevated risk of progressing to severe infections upon contracting COVID-19. We conducted a study on risk factors and multi-pathogen infections in KTRs with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant.

KTRs were subjected to a thorough etiological evaluation. Whenever feasible, they were also provided with bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage to enable metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), ideally within a 48-hour window post-admission. We performed a retrospective analysis for pathogens and risk factors of KTRs with the COVID-19 virus variant Omicron.

We included thirty patients in our study, with sixteen exhibiting single infection of COVID-19 and fourteen experiencing co-infections, predominantly with Pneumocystis jirovecii. Notably, patients with severe cases demonstrated significantly elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 compared to those with moderate cases (P < 0.05). Furthermore, individuals whose conditions progressed had markedly higher baseline serum creatinine levels than those without such progression (P < 0.05). The presence of heart failure, acute exacerbation of renal dysfunction, and a history of opportunistic infections were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of deterioration and hospital admission due to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, as compared to the control group (P < 0.05). In subsequent follow-up analysis, the all-cause rehospitalization rate was observed to be 21.4%, with Pneumocystis jirovecii infection accounting for half of these cases.

Among KTRs, a significant coinfection rate of 47% was observed, with Pneumocystis jirovecii emerging as the predominant pathogen in these cases. The development of heart failure, acute exacerbation of chronic renal dysfunction, and a prior history of opportunistic infections have been identified as potential risk factors that may contribute to clinical deterioration in KTRs. Additionally, Pneumocystis jirovecii infection has been established as a critical factor influencing the rate of all-cause rehospitalization within this patient population.

The global health crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in severe mortality and morbidity. Immunosuppressed patients, such as kidney transplant recipients, are particularly susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections.

The aim of this cohort study was to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on clinical outcomes in patients with kidney transplants.

In this retrospective study, 254 patients with kidney transplants were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and a fraction of these contracted COVID-19. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was carried out by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction testing, and the patients received treatment involving immunosuppressive and COVID-19-specific protocols.

SARS-CoV-2 infection was diagnosed in 38 (14.96%) patients before the COVID-19 vaccine was administered. After vaccination, an additional 29 (11.42%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19. Risk factors for hospitalization included age, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, and time elapsed since renal transplantation (p = 0.025, 0.038, 0.012, and 0.046, respectively). COVID-19 vaccination resulted in a significant decrease in the rate of hospital-acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection from 63.16% to 34.48% (p = 0.020). The proportion of patients from this cohort placed in intensive care units decreased from 23.68% to zero. Allograft rejections exhibited a decreasing trend from 13.16% to 6.90% (p = 0.690). This patient cohort displayed 15.79% mortality prior to COVID-19 vaccination that was reduced to nil after immunization.

COVID-19 vaccination significantly reduced COVID-19 severity and mortality in this cohort of patients with kidney transplants. The risk factors for hospitalization were determined to be age, BMI, comorbidities, and time since renal transplantation. COVID-19 vaccination resulted in a clinical outcome of reduced hospitalization and a decrease in clinical complications. The COVID-19 vaccination-derived adverse effects in this cohort were found to be comparable to those in the immunocompetent population.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are a vulnerable immunocompromised population at risk of severe COVID-19 disease and mortality after SARS-CoV-2 infection. We sought to characterize the post-infection sequelae in KTRs at our center.

We studied all adult KTRs (with a functioning allograft) who had their first episode of SARS-CoV-2 infection between 04/2020 and 04/2022. Outcomes of interest included risk factors for hospitalization, all-cause mortality, COVID-19-related mortality, and allograft failure.

Of 979 KTRs with SARS-CoV-2 infection, 381 (39%) were hospitalized. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for hospitalization included advanced age/year (HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.02-1.04), male sex (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.04-1.60), non-white race (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.17-1.88), and diabetes as a cause of ESKD (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.41-2.21). SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination was associated with decreased risk of hospitalization (HR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.59-0.90), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.37-0.74), and COVID-19-related mortality (HR: 0.47, 95% CI: 0.31-0.71) in the univariate and multivariate analyses. Risk factors for both all-cause and COVID-19-related mortality in the multivariate analyses included advanced age, hospitalization, and respiratory symptoms for hospital admission. Furthermore, additional risk factors for all-cause mortality in the multivariate analysis included being a non-white recipient and diabetes as a cause of ESKD, with being a recipient of a living donor as protective.

Hospitalization due to COVID-19-associated symptoms is associated with increased mortality. Vaccination is a protective factor against hospitalization and mortality.

The sudden outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in early 2020 posed a massive threat to human life and caused an economic upheaval worldwide. Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) became susceptible to infection during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to their use of immunosuppressants, resulting in increased hospitalization and mortality rates. Although the current epidemic situation is alleviated, the long-term existence of COVID-19 still seriously threatens the life and health of KTRs with low immunity. The Omicron variant, a highly infectious but less-pathogenic strain of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has raised concerns among transplant physicians regarding managing KTRs diagnosed with this variant. However, currently, there are no clear and unified guidelines for caring for KTRs infected with this variant. Therefore, we aimed to summarize the ongoing research on drugs that can treat Omicron variant infections in KTRs and explore the potential of adjusting immunotherapy strategies to enhance their responsiveness to vaccines. Herein, we discuss the situation of KTRs since the emergence of COVID-19 and focus on various prevention and treatment strategies for KTRs since the Omicron variant outbreak. We hope to assist physicians in managing KTRs in the presence of long-term COVID-19 variants.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a poorer SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response and higher risk for COVID-19-associated complications. However, there is no consensus on the current management of COVID-19 and data on persistent COVID-19 rates in SOT recipients are lacking.

An electronic survey concerning the management of COVID-19 in SOT recipients was distributed among all members of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Infections in Compromised Hosts (ESGICH) and of the European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT). Four major sections were covered: prevention, early COVID-19, late COVID-19, and persistent COVID-19. We developed a structured questionnaire including eight multiple-choice questions with branching logic in case of positive answers and three open-ended questions related to clinical practice. Questions were asked separately for lung and non-lung transplantation.

Thirty-two physicians from 24 different centers participated. Most answers (n = 30) were provided by European physicians. Thirty of 32 (93.75%) physicians managed non-lung transplant recipients and 12 of 32 (33.3%) lung transplant recipients. There was a huge variability in practice regarding the treatment of COVID-19, and particularly noticeable when considering lung and non-lung transplant recipients. Main discordances included the use of nirmatrelvir alone or in combination therapy for early COVID-19, the use of immunomodulatory drugs other than steroids for late COVID-19, and the need for treating asymptomatic viral shedding in persistent COVID-19. There was more similarity in terms of prophylaxis recommendations.

Despite a low number of respondents, this survey shows that there are many differences on how experts manage SARS-CoV-2 infections in SOT recipients.

A public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic has behavioral, mental and physical implications in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To what extent the presence of a transplant further increases this burden is not known. Therefore, we compared T1D patients with an islet or pancreas transplant (β-cell Tx; n = 51) to control T1D patients (n = 272). Fear of coronavirus infection was higher in those with β-cell Tx than without (Visual Analogue Scale 5.0 (3.0-7.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0-5.0), p = 0.004) and social isolation behavior was more stringent (45.8% vs. 14.0% reported not leaving the house, p < 0.001). A previous β-cell Tx was the most important predictor of at-home isolation. Glycemic control worsened in patients with β-cell Tx, but improved in control patients (ΔHbA1c +1.67 ± 8.74 vs. -1.72 ± 6.15 mmol/mol, p = 0.006; ΔTime-In-Range during continuous glucose monitoring -4.5% (-6.0%-1.5%) vs. +3.0% (-2.0%-6.0%), p = 0.038). Fewer patients with β-cell Tx reported easier glycemic control during lockdown (10.4% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.015). All T1D patients, regardless of transplantation status, experienced stress (33.4%), anxiety (27.9%), decreased physical activity (42.0%), weight gain (40.5%), and increased insulin requirements (29.7%). In conclusion, T1D patients with β-cell Tx are increasingly affected by a viral pandemic lockdown with higher fear of infection, more stringent social isolation behavior and deterioration of glycemic control. This trial has been registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry under identifying number NCT05977205 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05977205).

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) poses an important risk of morbidity and of mortality, in patients after solid organ transplantation. Recommendations have been issued by various transplantation societies at the national and European level to manage the immunosuppressive (IS) regimen upon admission to intensive care unit (ICU).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of IS regimen minimization strategy in kidney transplant recipients hospitalized in an ICU for severe COVID-19, in relation to the issued recommendations.

The immunosuppressive therapy was minimized in all patients, with respectively 63% and 59% of the patients meeting the local and european recommendations upon admission. During ICU stay, IS was further tapered leading to 85% (local) and 78% (european) adequacy, relative to the guidelines. The most frequent deviation was the lack of complete withdrawal of mycophenolic acid (22%). Nevertheless, the adequacy/inadequacy status was not associated to the ICU- or one-year-mortality.

In this single-center cohort, the only variable associated with a reduction in mortality was vaccination, emphasizing that the key issue is immunization prior to infection, not restoration of immunity during ICU stay.

Immunocompromised hosts, which encompass a diverse population of persons with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus disease, solid organ, and hematologic transplants, autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, bear a significant burden of the morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Immunocompromised patients who develop COVID-19 have a more severe illness, higher hospitalization rates, and higher mortality rates than immunocompetent patients. There are no well-defined treatment strategies that are specific to immunocompromised patients and vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma are variably effective. This review focuses on the specific impact of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients and the gaps in knowledge that require further study.

Background and Objectives: Kidney transplant recipients are at risk of developing more severe forms of COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical course of COVID-19 infection among kidney transplant patients and a control group. Materials and Methods: We examined 150 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. Patients were divided into study (kidney transplant recipients, n = 53) and control (without a history of kidney transplantation, n = 97) groups. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment data, and clinical outcomes were assessed. Results: The median patient age was 56.0 (46.0-64.0) years, and seventy-seven patients (51.3%) were men. The median Charlson comorbidity index was higher in the study group (3.0 vs. 2.0, p < 0.001). There was a higher incidence of hypoxemia in the control group upon arrival (52.6% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.001) and a higher NEWS index median (2.0 vs. 1.0 points, p = 0.009) and incidence of pneumonia during hospitalization (88.7% vs. 73.6%, p = 0.023). In the study group, there were more cases of mild (26.4% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.023) and critically severe forms of COVID-19 infection (26.4% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001), kidney failure was more prevalent (34.0% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001), and a greater number of patients were transferred to the intensive care unit (22.6% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.001) and died (18.9% vs. 1.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that treatment in the intensive care unit correlated with a higher mortality rate than transplantation itself (HR = 20.71, 95% CI 2.01-213.33, p = 0.011). Conclusions: The course of the COVID-19 disease in kidney transplant recipients is heterogeneous and can be more severe than in the general population. Even though patients may be hospitalized with fewer symptoms, complications and death are more likely to occur.

Coacervate droplets formed by liquid-liquid phase separation have attracted considerable attention due to their ability to enrich biomacromolecules while preserving their bioactivities. However, there are challenges to develop coacervate droplets as delivery vesicles for therapeutics resulting from the lack of physiological stability and inherent lack of membranes in coacervate droplets. Herein, polylysine-polynucleotide complex coacervate droplets with favorable physiological stability are formulated to efficiently and facilely concentrate small molecules, biomacromolecules and nanoparticles without organic solvents. To improve the biocompatibility, the PEGylated phospholipid membrane is further coated on the surface of the coacervate droplets to prepare coacervate-based artificial protocells (ArtPC) with membrane-like and cytoplasm-like structures. The ArtPC can confine the cyclic catalytic system of uricase and catalase inside to degrade uric acid and deplete the toxicity of H2O2. This biofunctional ArtPC effectively reduces blood uric acid levels and prevents renal injuries in mice with persistent hyperuricemia. The ArtPC-based therapy can bridge the disciplines of synthetic biology, pharmaceutics and therapeutics.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused over 656 million confirmed cases and over 6.6 million deaths worldwide. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is considered a high-risk factor for COVID-19; therefore, considerable research has been conducted in this field. Therefore, this study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications related to COVID-19 and CKD.

Publications were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database on 16 January 2023 and screened based on inclusion criteria. Then the authors used Microsoft Excel and CiteSpace to analyze the included publications from the following seven aspects: countries/regions, institutions, journals, authors, cited references, and keywords.

In total, 622 publications were included in the study. The USA has the most publications in this field, followed by China. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and Harvard Medical School had the highest number of publications in the field. Journal of Clinical Medicine had the largest number of publications, and Lancet was the most cited journal. Alberto Ortiz was the author with the largest number of publications, but there were no influential authors in this field. The highly cited references are mainly clinical studies on COVID-19. Research hotspots in this field include end-stage recent disease, cardiovascular disease, kidney metastasis, diabetes Mellitus, acute kidney injury, meta-analysis, and consistent plasma.

The USA, China, and some European countries and their institutions are major contributors to these publications. End-stage renal disease, acute kidney injury, kidney transplantation and convalescent plasma are current hot topics in the field.

The systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted for COVID-19 infections in kidney transplant patients. Recent research on this topic was still scarce and limited meta-analysis research discussion, specific to some risks or treatment in kidney transplantation patients with COVID-19 infection. Therefore, this article demonstrated the fundamental steps to conducting systematic review and meta-analysis studies to derive a pooled estimate of predictor factors of worse outcomes in kidney transplant patients with positive for the SARS-CoV- 2 test•PICOT Framework to determine the research scope•PRISMA strategy for study selection•Forest Plot for meta-analysis study.

To investigate the emotional attributes and vaccine implementation rate of patients waiting for kidney transplants during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic.

We included 145 patients who were on the waiting list at our institution. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and emotional changes were assessed using a telephone questionnaire comprising 13 questions, including vaccine implementation. We also investigated factors affecting the decision to accept or decline deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Of the 145 patients, 121 (83.4%) provided informed consent and completed the questionnaire. The median age at registration on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation and the median waiting period was 45.5 years and 103 months, respectively. This cohort comprised 84 males and 37 females. Twenty patients (16.5%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, and 15 (12.4%) were more curious about deceased-donor kidney transplantation. One hundred patients (82.6%) were vaccinated against COVID-19 more than thrice. Thirty patients (24.8%) declined, and 91 patients (75.2%) accepted an organ transplant offer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate analysis revealed that the long-term waiting period (P = .038) and anxiety about COVID-19, such as visiting the transplant facility (P < .0001) and prudence over time (P < .0001), were independent factors influencing the decline of a kidney transplant offer.

Our findings suggest that some patients hesitated to undergo deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the pandemic. There is a need to develop an appropriate system to ensure safe and secure kidney transplantation during prolonged pandemics.

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and kidney transplants (KT) are at an elevated risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality. A comprehensive comparison of morbidity and mortality between these populations with kidney disease and individuals without any kidney disease is lacking.

We analysed the 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for non-elective adult COVID-19 hospitalizations, categorizing patients into advanced CKD, ESKD, KT, and kidney disease-free cohorts. Our analysis included a description of the distribution of comorbidities across the entire spectrum of CKD, ESKD, and KT. Additionally, we investigated in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization, adjusting for potential confounders through multivariable regression models.

The study included 1,018,915 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2020. The incidence of advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT in this cohort was 5.8%, 3.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Patients with advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT exhibited higher multimorbidity burdens, with 90.3%, 91.0%, and 75.2% of patients in each group having a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) equal to or greater than 3. The all-cause in-hospital mortality ranged from 9.3% in kidney disease-free patients to 20.6% in advanced CKD, 19.4% in ESKD, and 12.4% in KT patients. After adjusting for potential confounders at both the patient and hospital levels, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were found to be associated with increased odds of mortality, with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of 1.34, 1.80, 2.66, 1.97, and 1.69, respectively.

Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with advanced CKD, ESKD, or KT demonstrated a higher burden of comorbidities and increased mortality rates compared to those without kidney disease. After adjusting for confounders, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, illustrating a dose-response relationship between the odds of mortality and adverse outcomes as CKD progressed from stages 3 to 5. Our study highlights the necessity for enhanced management of comorbidities, targeted interventions, and vigorous vaccination efforts to mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes in the vulnerable populations of patients with CKD, ESKD, and KT.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at high risk for severe COVID-19 and have demonstrated poor response to vaccination, making it unclear whether successive vaccinations offer immunity and protection.

We conducted a serologically guided interventional study where KTR patients that failed to seroconvert were revaccinated and also monitored seroconversion of KTR following the Norwegian vaccination program. We analysed IgG anti-RBD Spike responses from dose 2 (n = 432) up to after the 6th (n = 37) mRNA vaccine dose. The frequency and phenotype of Spike-specific T and B cell responses were assessed in the interventional cohort after 3-4 vaccine doses (n = 30). Additionally, we evaluated the Specific T and B cell response to breakthrough infection (n = 32), measured inflammatory cytokines and broadly cross-neutralizing antibodies, and defined the incidence of COVID-19-related hospitalizations and deaths. The Norwegian KTR cohort has a male dominance (2323 males, 1297 females), PBMC were collected from 114 male and 78 female donors.

After vaccine dose 3, most KTR developed Spike-specific T cell responses but had significantly reduced Spike-binding B cells and few memory cells. The B cell response included a cross-reactive subset that could bind Omicron VOC, which expanded after breakthrough infection (BTI) and gave rise to a memory IgG+ B cell response. After BTI, KTR had increased Spike-specific T cells, emergent non-Spike T and B cell responses, and a systemic inflammatory signature. Late seroconversion occurred after doses 5-6, but 38% (14/37) of KTR had no detectable immunity even after multiple vaccine doses.

Boosting vaccination can induce Spike-specific immunity that may expand in breakthrough infections highlighting the benefit of vaccination to protect this vulnerable population.

CEPI and internal funds.

The impact of immunosuppression in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection is unknown. The knowledge about the behavior of different immunosuppression schemes in clinical outcomes is scarce. This study aimed to determine the risk of death in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 under two different schemes of immunosuppression.

We describe our experience in kidney transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection in seven transplant centers during the first year of the pandemic before starting the vaccination programs in the city of Bogotá. Demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, immunosuppression schemes at presentation, and global treatment strategies were compared between recovered and dead patients; survival analysis was carried out between calcineurin inhibitors based regimen and free calcineurin inhibitors regimen.

Among 165 confirmed cases, 28 died (17%); the risk factors for mortality identified in univariate analysis were age older than 60 years (p=.003) diabetes (p=.001), immunosuppression based on calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) (p=.025) and patients receiving steroids (p=.041). In multivariable analysis, hypoxemia (p=.000) and calcineurin inhibitors regimen (p=.002) were predictors of death. Survival analysis showed increased mortality risk in patients receiving CNI based immunosuppression regimen vs. CNI free regimens mortality rates were, respectively, 21.7% and 8.5% (p=.036).

Our results suggest that the calcineurin inhibitors probably do not provide greater protection compared to calcineurin inhibitor free schemes being necessary to carry out analyzes that allow us to evaluate the outcomes with different immunosuppression schemes in solid organ transplant recipients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19's severity has been associated with a possible imbalance in the cross-regulation of cytokines and vascular mediators. Since the beginning of the pandemic, kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) have been identified as patients of high vulnerability to more severe diseases. Thus, aiming to describe the patterns of cytokines and vascular mediators and to trace patients' differences according to their KTR status, this prospective study enrolled 67 COVID-19 patients (20 KTRs) and 29 non-COVID-19 controls before vaccination. A panel comprising 17 circulating cytokines and vascular mediators was run on samples collected at different time points. The cytokine and mediator patterns were investigated via principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation-based network (CBN). In both groups, compared to their respective controls, COVID-19 was associated with higher levels of cytokines and vascular mediators. Differentiating between the KTRs and non-KTRs, the number of correlations was much higher in the non-KTRs (44 vs. 14), and the node analysis showed the highest interactions of NGAL and sVCAM-1 in the non-KTRs and KTRs (9 vs. 4), respectively. In the PCA, while the non-KTRs with COVID-19 were differentiated from their controls in their IL-10, IFN-α, and TNF-α, this pattern was marked in the NGAL, sVCAM-1, and IL-8 of the KTRs.

We report the results of an observational study, analyzing the clinical course of kidney transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19 and comparing it with a control to determine if outcomes, nosocomial, and opportunistic infections were different between groups.

An observational, retrospective, case-control, single-center study, including a group of kidney transplant adults diagnosed with COVID-19, from March 2020 to April 2022. Transplant patients hospitalized for COVID-19 comprised the cases. The control group consisted of non-transplanted adults, without immunosuppressive treatment, hospitalized for COVID-19, and matched by age, sex, and month at diagnosis of COVID-19. Study variables were collected, including demographic/clinical, epidemiologic, clinical/biological at diagnosis, evolutive, and outcome variables.

Fifty-eight kidney transplant recipients were included. Thirty required hospital admission. Ninety controls were included. Transplant recipients had a higher frequency of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, ventilatory support, and death. The relative risk for death was 2.45. When adjusted by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and comorbidity, only the risk for opportunistic infection remained high. Variables independently associated with death were dyslipidemia, eGFR at admission, MULBSTA score, and ventilatory support. Pneumonia by Klebsiella oxytoca was the most frequent nosocomial infection. Pulmonary aspergillosis was the most frequent opportunistic infection overall. Pneumocystosis and cytomegalovirus colitis were more frequent among transplant patients. The relative risk for opportunistic infection in this group was 1.88. Baseline eGFR, serum interleukin 6 level, and coinfection were independently associated with it.

Evolutive course of COVID-19 requiring hospitalization in renal transplant recipients was primarily determined by comorbidity and baseline kidney function. At equal comorbidity and renal function, there were no differences in mortality, ICU admission, nosocomial infection, and hospital stay. However, the risk for opportunistic infection remained high.

Since its initial detection in 2019, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has rapidly spread throughout the world in a global pandemic. However, reports of COVID-19 pneumonia among patients following kidney transplantation have been limited and no uniform treatment guidelines for these patients have yet to be established.

Here, we report the case of a 39-year-old patient recovering from kidney transplantation who contracted perioperative COVID-19 pneumonia that was successfully controlled with oral paxlovid and a single intravenous drip infusion of tocilizumab following the discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs.

Given the rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections, clinicians should be aware of the potential for more cases of COVID-19 among patients following kidney transplantation and be familiar with appropriate treatment options and likely clinical outcomes.

SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) has had a significant impact on transplant activity in our country. Mortality and the risk of complications associated with COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients (KT) were expected to be higher due to their immunosuppressed condition and the frequent associated comorbidities. Since the beginning of the pandemic in March 2020 we have rapidly improved our knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features and management of COVID-19 post-transplant, resulting in a better prognosis for our patients. KT units have been able to adapt their programs to this new reality, normalizing both donation and transplantation activity in our country. This manuscript presents a proposal to update the general recommendations for the prevention and treatment of infection in this highly vulnerable population such as KT.

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged the entire world, and patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have been particularly affected. We aimed to evaluate predictors of mortality during the first 30 days of hospitalization in critically ill patients with COVID-19 and comorbid DM. This prospective study included 110 critically ill patients admitted with COVID-19 infection. Thirty-two (29%) patients had a previous diagnosis of DM. Clinical variables, laboratory tests, and vascular biomarkers, such as VCAM-1, syndecan-1, ICAM-1, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoeitin-2, were evaluated after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A comparison was made between patients with and without DM. No difference in mortality was observed between the groups (48.7 vs 46.9%, P=0.861). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, VCAM-1 levels at ICU admission (HR: 1 [1-1.001], P<0.006) were associated with death in patients with DM. Among patients with DM, advanced age (HR 1.063 [1.031-1.096], P<0.001), increased Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio (HR: 4.515 [1.803-11.308] P=0.001), and need for dialysis (HR: 3.489 [1.409-8.642], P=0.007) were independent predictors of death. Higher levels of VCAM-1 in patients with DM was better at predicting death of patients with severe COVID-19 and comorbid DM, and their cut-off values were useful for stratifying patients with a worse prognosis. Vascular biomarkers VCAM-1 and Ang-2/Ang-1 ratio were predictors of death in patients with severe COVID-19 and comorbid DM and those without DM. Additionally, kidney injury was associated with an increased risk of death.

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 are at greater risk of serious illness and death than the general population. To date, the efficacy and safety of the fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in KTRs have not been systematically discussed.

This systematic review and meta-analysis included articles from PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Med Online published before May 15, 2022. Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients were selected.

Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 727 KTRs. The overall pooled seropositivity rate after the fourth COVID-19 vaccine was 60% (95% CI, 49%-71%, I2 = 87.83%, p > 0.01). The pooled proportion of KTRs seronegative after the third dose that transitioned to seropositivity after the fourth dose was 30% (95% CI, 15%-48%, I2 = 94.98%, p < 0.01).

The fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine was well tolerated in KTRs with no serious adverse effects. Some KTRs showed a reduced response even after receiving the fourth vaccine dose. Overall, the fourth vaccine dose effectively improved seropositivity in KTRs, as recommended by the World Health Organization for the general population.

Liver diseases after kidney transplantation range from mild biochemical abnormalities to severe hepatitis or cirrhosis. The causes are diverse and mainly associated with hepatotropic viruses, drug toxicity and metabolic disorders. Over the past decade, the aetiology of liver disease in kidney recipients has changed significantly. These relates to the use of direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus, the increasing availability of vaccination against hepatitis B and a better understanding of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. In addition, the emergence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic has brought new challenges to kidney recipients. This review aims to provide healthcare professionals with a comprehensive understanding of recent advances in the management of liver complications in kidney recipients and to enable them to make informed decisions regarding the risks and impact of liver disease in this population.

The response to vaccination against the virus that causes severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 is lower in renal transplant recipients than in the general population. The data obtained from Latin America showed reduced immunogenicity under inactivated virus vaccination schedules and messenger ribonucleic acid platforms.

A retrospective cohort study including renal transplant recipients from Colombia with a two-dose vaccination schedule against severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Moderna, Jansen, and Sinovac vaccines between March 1, 2021 and December 1, 2021, was carried out with a follow-up period to evaluate outcomes until May 2022. The outcomes correspond to the titers of immunoglobulin G antibodies against the receptor binding domain of the severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 spike and a composite outcome of mortality, general, and intensive care unit hospitalization.

In total, 215 renal transplant recipients with two doses of vaccination for severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 during the predominance of the Omicron variant in Colombia were included, with the measurement of immunoglobulin G antibody titers against the receptor binding domain of the severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 spike at 8 weeks of vaccination. The mean age was 52.1 years, and the standard deviation was ± 14.2; severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 infection occurred in 20% of the population, of which 23.26% required hospitalization, 13.95% were under intensive care unit management, and four cases of mortality (9.3%) were reported. Of the total population, 52.5% had antibody titers higher than 0.8 IU/mL (median 0.77 IU/mL, interquartile range 0.4-131). Patients with severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 infection had a median antibody titer of 0.4 IU/mL (interquartile range 0.4-3.45), and those without infection had a median antibody titer of 1.8 IU/mL (interquartile range 0.4-202) (p = 0.015).

Anti-severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody titers with a cutoff point less than 0.8 IU/mL are associated with increased risk of severe acute respiratory infection syndrome coronavirus 2 infection.

The world has experienced a global medical and socioeconomic burden following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. COVID-19 is a systemic disease and may affect different organs including the kidneys. Current literature contains reports on COVID-19-related conditions such as acute kidney injury, and complications experienced by chronic kidney disease, end stage kidney disease, and kidney transplant patients. Here, we discuss the incidence of kidney allograft rejection, immunosuppression management and rejection risk, donor-specific antibodies and previous rejection episodes, and rejection outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 by reviewing current studies.

Obesity is one of the components of the cardiometabolic syndrome that contributes to COVID-19 progression and mortality. Immunosuppressed individuals are at greater risk of the COVID-19 burden. Therefore, we sought to investigate the impact of the combination of overweight/obesity and kidney transplant on oxygen (O2) requirements in the COVID-19 setting.

Retrospective analysis of 284 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) from March/2020 to August/2020 in a single center. We investigated the risk factors associated with O2 requirements in overweight/obese KTRs.

Overall, 65.1% had a BMI (body mass index) ≥ 25 kg/m2, 52.4% were male, the mean age was 53.3 ± 11 years old, 78.4% had hypertension, and 41.1% had diabetes mellitus. BMI was an independent risk factor for O2 requirements (OR = 1.07, p = 0.02) alongside age, lymphopenia, and hyponatremia. When overweight/obese KTRs were older, smokers, they presented higher levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and lower levels of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), lymphocytes, and sodium at admission, and they needed O2 more often.

Being overweight/obese is associated with greater O2 requirements in KTRs, in particular in older people and smokers, with worse kidney allograft functions, more inflammation, and lower sodium levels. Therefore, the early identification of factors that predict a worse outcome in overweight/obese KTRs affected by COVID-19 contributes to risk stratification and therapeutic decisions.

Kidney transplant recipients are immunocompromised hosts at risk for comorbidity and mortality due to infection. Currently, there are no established guidelines for the management of immunosuppressed transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The impact of COVID-19 and its therapeutic management on chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAAMR) are still unclear. Here, we report a case of CAAMR exacerbation with endarteritis and intimal fibrosis after COVID-19. A 41-year-old female kidney transplant recipient with CAAMR was admitted to a local hospital with moderately severe COVID-19. Her doses of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were reduced, and she was administered methylprednisolone pulse and antiviral drugs. This resulted in a good clinical course and she was discharged in 15 days. During and after hospitalization, the immunosuppressants were gradually returned to the baseline levels. However, about 1.5 months after discharge, the serum creatinine level became elevated. An indication kidney biopsy showed CAAMR with intimal fibrosis and endarteritis in all interlobular arteries. An increase of immunosuppressant led to a decrease of the serum creatinine level. Factors contributing to CAAMR with intimal fibrosis and endarteritis may include (1) insufficient immunosuppression due to changes in the levels of immunosuppressive; (2) overlap with endothelial cell injury caused by COVID-19, and (3) an immune-activated state associated with COVID-19. COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease that can result in unexpected changes in immunological status. Possible allograft rejection should be carefully managed in such patients.

Immunocompromised hosts, which encompass a diverse population of persons with malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus disease, solid organ, and hematologic transplants, autoimmune diseases, and primary immunodeficiencies, bear a significant burden of the morbidity and mortality due to coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Immunocompromised patients who develop COVID-19 have a more severe illness, higher hospitalization rates, and higher mortality rates than immunocompetent patients. There are no well-defined treatment strategies that are specific to immunocompromised patients and vaccines, monoclonal antibodies, and convalescent plasma are variably effective. This review focuses on the specific impact of COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients and the gaps in knowledge that require further study.