The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains understudied, with limited long-term data from large cohorts inclusive of both salvage radiotherapy (SRT)-treated and untreated patients. Herein, we sought to evaluate the outcomes of patients with BCR and the impact of SRT on disease progression.

Patients undergoing RP who developed BCR (PSA ≥ 0.20 ng/mL) were included. Patients with BCR treated with SRT were compared to untreated patients using risk-set matching with time-dependent propensity scores. The primary outcome was metastases, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models. The number needed to treat (NNT) with SRT to prevent progression was derived at 5 and 15 years.

Among 6881 patients with BCR, 2109 received SRT. At a median follow-up of 10.2 years, 1147 patients developed metastases. The median PSA at the time of SRT was 0.50 ng/mL. After 1:1 propensity score matching (2109 patients per cohort), SRT significantly reduced the risk of metastases at 5 (12.7% vs. 19.3%, p < 0.0001) and 15 years (28.6% vs. 31.5%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, SRT independently reduced metastasis risk (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.63-0.90, p = 0.002), translating to NNT of 23 and 15 at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Interaction analyses between SRT and nodal status (p = 0.04) showed greater metastasis risk reduction in pN+ (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.77, p = 0.005) compared to pN- disease (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67-0.97, p = 0.02).

Most patients with BCR post-RP do not progress to metastasis. For those who do progress, SRT inarguably improves the oncologic outcomes in the BCR setting. However, careful patient selection and shared decision making should be encouraged in order to limit overtreatment and side effects.

Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the most prevalent malignancies in men, with diagnostic challenges arising from the limited specificity of current biomarkers, like PSA. Improved stratification tools are essential to reduce overdiagnosis and guide personalized patient management. Objective: This study aimed to identify and validate clinical and hematological biomarkers capable of differentiating PCa from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and precancerous lesions (PL) using univariate and multivariate statistical methods. Methods: In a cohort of 514 patients with suspected PCa, we performed a univariate analysis (Kruskal-Wallis and ANOVA) with preprocessing via adaptive Box-Cox transformation and missing value imputation through probabilistic principal component analysis (PPCA). LASSO regression was used for variable selection and classification. An ROC curve analysis assessed diagnostic performance. Results: Five variables-age, PSA, Index %, hemoglobin (HGB), and the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-were consistently significant across univariate and multivariate analyses. The LASSO regression achieved a classification accuracy of 70% and an AUC of 0.74. Biplot and post-hoc analyses confirmed partial separation between PCa and benign conditions. Conclusions: The integration of multivariate modeling with reconstructed clinical data enabled the identification of blood-based biomarkers with strong diagnostic potential. These routinely available, cost-effective indicators may support early PCa diagnosis and patient stratification, reducing unnecessary invasive procedures.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer, affecting millions of men globally and having a significant burden on health care systems. During recent years, the rapid development of the nuclear medicine field and the wide use and application of positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) have significantly changed the diagnosis, treatment approach and patient outcomes. Semiquantitative analysis in PET/CT imaging quantifies the load of the disease in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer without measuring the precise amount of a radiotracer injected into the patient; instead, there is an indirect evaluation of the radiotracer using semiquantitative indices. Beginning with the standard uptake value (SUV) in Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT, various semiquantitative measures have been created and are now used for analyzing different radiotracers. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the importance of the semiquantitative analysis in PET/CT imaging with the use of prostate-specific radiotracers at the initial staging of prostate cancer, as well as in biochemical recurrence and in the metastatic state.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of neoadjuvant novel hormonal therapy (NHT) versus classical hormonal therapy (CHT) before radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer.

Propensity score matching (2:1) was performed to minimize the effect of confounders at our center. We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients who received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for 3-6 months from March 2019 to April 2023. The novel hormonal agents included apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide, whereas the classical hormonal agent was bicalutamide. The primary endpoint was pathological response. Secondary outcomes included prostate specific antigen (PSA) complete response rate, biochemical recurrence-free survival (bRFS), and biochemical response rate.

After propensity score matching, 63 patients were matched to the CHT group and 36 patients were matched to the NHT group. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy. Pathological response Group 0 was not observed in either group; 41.3% (26/63) of patients in the CHT group achieved a complete response (Group 1), compared with 52.8% (19/36) in the NHT group. Neoadjuvant NHT showed significant advantages over CHT in reducing prostate volume (p < 0.001), downstaging (p = 0.012), and the PSA complete response rate (p = 0.002). PSA complete response was an independent predictor for complete response (OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.14-6.88, p = 0.025). Neoadjuvant NHT also demonstrated a significant improvement in bRFS compared with CHT, and there was a 70% lower risk of biochemical recurrence in the NHT group (HR 0.3, 95% CI 0.17-0.55, p = 0.0006).

Neoadjuvant NHT resulted in superior pathological responses and PSA responses compared with neoadjuvant CHT in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer. Lower PSA values prior to RP were associated with complete response. Our findings highlighted a significant benefit of neoadjuvant NHT in improving bRFS.

Not applicable.

To determine whether 6 months of combined androgen blockade (CAB) treatment would result in metabolic changes of hippocampus and whether metabolic changes correlate with changes in cognition in patients with advanced prostate cancer (PCa).

This is an observational study. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) was used to observe the changes in the ratios of N-acetylaspartate/creatine (NAA/Cr) and choline-containing compounds/creatine (Cho/Cr) on the bilateral hippocampus for the patients before and 6 months after CAB treatment. Cognitive function was also assessed by the Beijing version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-BJ) at the above two time points. Additionally, a certain number of matched individuals undergoing physical examination were selected as the control group.

CAB group comprised 25 patients with advanced PCa completing follow-up, while control group had 22 healthy controls. Prior to CAB, no significant differences existed in MoCA-BJ scores (including sub-scores) or bilateral hippocampal NAA/Cr and Cho/Cr ratios between groups. Six months after CAB, CAB group exhibited marked declines in MoCA-BJ total score, delayed recall, visuospatial/executive, and attention functions, alongside reduced bilateral hippocampal NAA/Cr and elevated left hippocampal Cho/Cr (P < 0.05).The results of multiple linear regression indicate a positive correlation between NAA/Cr in the left hippocampus and MoCA-BJ total score (β = 4.66, P < 0.001), as well as delayed recall function (β = 2.76, P < 0.001). Mediation analysis confirms that testosterone influences the MoCA-BJ total score and delayed recall function by affecting NAA/Cr in the left hippocampus.

The impact of advanced PCa on cognitive performance could be negligible. However, patients experienced secondary hippocampal injury after CAB, which further led to cognitive dysfunction.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States, following skin cancer, with an incidence rate of 112.7 per 100,000 men per year. The need for a reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tool for early PCa detection (screening, biochemical residual disease) remains unmet due to the limitations of PSA testing, which often leads to overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The PROSTest is a novel, blood-based qPCR assay that assesses gene expression to diagnose PCa and predict patient outcomes to different treatments. This study aimed to validate the sensitivity and specificity of the PROSTest in a diverse cohort of US-based PCa patients compared to healthy controls.

This prospective study included 143 PCa patients and 92 healthy controls. Blood samples were collected, and the PROSTest was conducted following RNA isolation and cDNA production, using a predefined 27-gene algorithm to provide a binary output. The assay's sensitivity and specificity were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, with a 50% score cut-off distinguishing PCa from non-PCa patients. Analytical reproducibility was assessed with intra- and inter-assay comparisons of Ct values and PROSTest scores.

The PROSTest demonstrated a sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 89-98%) and a specificity of 88% (95% CI 80-94%) in distinguishing PCa patients from controls, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.97. The false positive rate among controls was 12%. Intra- and inter-assay reproducibility was confirmed with no significant differences in Ct values or PROSTest scores between operators or assays. PROSTest scores were significantly higher in PCa patients compared to controls and in those undergoing treatment versus untreated patients.

This validation study confirms the high sensitivity and specificity of the PROSTest in detecting PCa in a diverse USA cohort. The assay's robustness and reproducibility support its potential as a reliable diagnostic tool for PCa detection and monitoring. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its utility across broader populations and treatment settings.

Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPCa) presents de novo or represents significant disease progression and requires systemic treatment. However, progression to castration resistance is inevitable. The treatment landscape has evolved with the introduction of intensified systemic therapy, including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with either androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) or cytotoxic chemotherapy (doublet therapy) or combined therapy with both agents (triplet therapy). Landmark trials such as CHAARTED, STAMPEDE, LATITUDE, ENZAMET, and TITAN have established combination therapies as the standard of care, demonstrating significant overall survival benefits. More recently, triplet therapy-integrating ADT, docetaxel, and an ARSI-has emerged as an effective approach, particularly in high-volume metastatic disease, as supported by ARASENS and PEACE-1. Advances in imaging, such as PSMA PET-CT, have improved disease detection, allowing earlier detection of metastasis and appropriate therapy. Similarly, genomic profiling has enabled biomarker-driven, personalized treatment strategies. The role of treatment of the primary tumor, by either radiation therapy or cytoreductive prostatectomy, in low-volume disease continues to be explored. As novel therapies, targeted agents, and immunotherapies undergo investigation, optimizing treatment selection based on disease burden, molecular characteristics, and patient factors will be essential. The future of mHSPCa management lies in multidisciplinary, precision-based approaches to improve patient outcomes while balancing treatment efficacy and tolerability.

This podcast features two of the investigators from the international, randomized, phase III EMBARK trial (NCT02319837) in conversation. The findings from EMBARK led to the subsequent approval of enzalutamide by the US Food and Drug Administration for nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC) with biochemical recurrence (BCR) at high risk for metastasis, and by the European Medicines Agency for patients with high-risk BCR nmCSPC who are unsuitable for salvage radiotherapy. Treatment guidelines have now been updated accordingly to reflect these approvals. In this first of a series of podcasts about EMBARK, the speakers discuss the background and rationale for the EMBARK trial, including the unmet medical need in this patient population, and examine some notable features of the study design.

Real-world data on treatment patterns and survival outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) remain limited. This study aims to characterize treatment sequencing, duration across lines of therapy, and survival outcomes in patients with mHSPC.

This single-center, retrospective, non-interventional study included men newly diagnosed with mHSPC at King Abdullah Medical City Cancer Center between 2016 and 2023. Treatment patterns, including sequencing and duration of therapy, were described. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) from mHSPC diagnosis to death or censoring at the end of follow-up.

Among 102 patients, the mean age was 70 years, BMI of 26, with 53% having a performance status of 2. Comorbidities included hypertension (51%), diabetes (45%), and cardiovascular disease (20.6%). Nearly half (48%) had a Gleason score of nine, with 62.7% presenting with bone metastases. Novel hormonal therapy (NHT) was the predominant first-line treatment (86%), with abiraterone used in 43% of cases. Second- and third-line treatments were received by 34% and 13% of patients, respectively. The median durations of first-, second-, and third-line therapies were 21, 5, and 2.6 months, respectively. Median OS from diagnosis was 24 months.

Despite the predominant use of novel hormonal therapy (NHT), patients in this cohort exhibited aggressive disease and poor survival outcomes. These findings highlight a critical need for more intensive and tailored treatment strategies for mHSPC.

In the TITAN trial of patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), deep and rapid prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline with apalutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was associated with longer overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to PSA progression (TTPP), and time to castration resistance (TTCR) compared with no decline (all p < 0.0001). This post hoc analysis evaluated PSA kinetics in the Asian subpopulation.

Data were analyzed for patients enrolled in China, Japan, and Korea and treated with apalutamide (n = 111) or placebo (n = 110) plus ADT. Examined were depth of PSA response, rates of PSA decline, and associations between a deep PSA response and clinical outcomes in apalutamide-treated patients.

Confirmed PSA response rates were higher with apalutamide than placebo: 73.9% versus 33.6% for PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, 90.1% versus 58.2% for PSA reduction ≥50% [PSA50], and 74.8% versus 25.5% for PSA reduction ≥90% [PSA90]. Median (Q1; Q3) time to PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL, PSA50 and PSA90 response in the apalutamide group was 1.9 (1.0; 3.7), 1.0 (1.0; 1.0), and 1.8 (1.0; 1.9) months, respectively. PSA responses with apalutamide or placebo were consistent irrespective of high- or low-volume disease. Achievement of confirmed PSA ≤0.2 ng/mL or PSA90 response with apalutamide at landmark 3 months was associated with significantly (nominal p-values) longer OS (hazard ratio: 0.23; p = 0.0009), TTPP (0.16; p = 0.0001), TTCR (0.20; p < 0.0001), and time to progression on first subsequent therapy or death (0.19; p < 0.0001) compared with no decline.

PSA kinetics have applications for early prognostic evaluation in Asian patients with mCSPC.

Although prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has impacted the investigation and management of biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer, negative scans are common at low rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. PET/CT devices with an extended axial field-of-view, such as the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra (Quadra) scanner, have substantially higher sensitivity than conventional field-of-view scanners. Our aim was to assess whether the enhanced signal-to-noise ratios achieved on the Quadra scanner improve detection of low-volume disease and thereby increase detection of PC at low PSA levels.

We analysed data for the first 300 consecutive patients who underwent clinically indicated PSMA PET/CT for BCR using a Quadra scanner. We assessed scan positivity and the location of detected disease by PSA category.

The positivity rate increased with the PSA level from 67% for PSA <0.2 ng/ml to >90% for PSA >1.0 ng/ml (p < 0.05). Disease location also differed by PSA category, with prostate bed recurrence alone identified in 63% of positive cases with PSA <0.2 ng/ml, but <25% of cases with PSA >1.0 ng/ml, and distant metastases present in only 6% of positive cases with PSA <0.2 ng/ml versus >40% of cases with PSA >1.0 ng/ml. In the group with PSA <0.2 ng/ml, pelvic nodal disease without local recurrence was identified in 31% of cases.

In comparison to literature data, the Quadra scanner has substantially higher positivity rates at very low PSA levels. At these levels, disease was largely confined to the pelvis and potentially amenable to salvage radiotherapy. However, more than one-third of these patients had disease exclusively outside the prostate bed, with implications for the efficacy and morbidity of current salvage radiotherapy approaches.

We investigated a new PET/CT scanner (positron emission tomography/computed tomography) for detection of prostate cancer recurrence. This more sensitive scanner had a higher detection rate, particularly for patients with low PSA (prostate-specific antigen) in their blood. Our results suggest that the new scanner can detect disease recurrence earlier and more accurately than standard PET/CT scanners, which can help in planning further treatment.

This study aimed to investigate the potential for using the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene as a prognostic marker in post-prostatectomy patients with castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PCa).

A total of 180 patients with castration-sensitive PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution were included in this study. PTEN expression was evaluated using immunohistochemistry, and patients were classified into two groups based on the staining intensity: PTEN-Normal and PTEN-Loss. The association between PTEN expression and biochemical recurrence was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Patients in the PTEN-Loss group had a higher risk of biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio, 4.642; 95% confidence interval, 2.137-10.083; p < 0.001) and a lower recurrence-free rate compared to the PTEN-Normal group (35% vs. 75%). In addition to clinicopathological factors, such as the serum prostate-specific antigen level, Gleason score, and T stage, evaluation of PTEN expression improved the prediction of biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy (area under the curve, 0.577 vs. 0.688).

Low PTEN expression is a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence in patients with castration-sensitive PCa who have already undergone prostatectomy.

Advances made in the screening, diagnosis and management of prostate cancer have improved the survival rates of the patients. However, many of these treatments including surgery, radiotherapy, and pharmacotherapy, have an impact on the subsequent health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of these patients. Since it is an important prognostic factor of survival, failure to evaluate the HRQoL and its predictors in these patients typically results in long-term deficits in their overall well-being, that is, their physical, social, emotional, and mental health. The objective of this study was to evaluate the management and HRQoL among patients with prostate cancer at Kenyatta National Hospital.

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study. The sample size of 62 patients who met the eligibility criteria was selected through simple random sampling on the respective clinic days of the cancer treatment centre and urology clinic. Data was collected through a pre-tested structured questionnaire and HRQoL tools which are EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC-QLQ-PR25 and analysed using STATA version 13 software. Descriptive analysis was used to summarise the continuous and categorical variables. Spearman's rho (rs) correlation was used to determine the predictors of HRQoL based on the strength and significance of association at 0.05 level of significance.

The mean age of the participants was 70.5 (±7.35) years. The majority (52, 83.9%) of the patients had a prostate specific antigen (PSA) above 20 ng/ml. Twenty-one (33.9%) were graded as Gleason group 5 and 41 (66.1%) had stage IV disease at diagnosis. Fifty (80.9%) participants were on hormonal therapy, with most of them being on combined androgen blockade. The overall HRQoL was 65.1. Fatigue, one of the major complaints among these patients, was negatively associated with physical functioning (p = 0.0005), role functioning (p = 0.0026), social functioning (p = 0.0001), financial difficulties (p = 0.0077) and quality of life (p = 0.0050).

Fatigue was the most common predictor of poor HRQoL in several scales of measurement. For those on management, frequent assessment of HRQoL should be carried out and interventions instituted immediately.

Previous studies have shown that Black men receive worse prostate cancer care than White men. This has not been explored in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in the current treatment era.

We evaluated treatment intensification (TI) and overall survival (OS) in Medicare (2015-2018) and Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 2015-2019) patients with mCSPC, classifying first-line mCSPC treatment as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + novel hormonal therapy; ADT + docetaxel; ADT + first-generation nonsteroidal antiandrogen; or ADT alone.

We analyzed 2226 Black and 16,071 White Medicare, and 1020 Black and 2364 White VHA patients. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58-0.81) and without Medicaid (adjusted OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57-0.87). Medicaid patients had less TI irrespective of race. OS was worse for Black vs White Medicare patients overall (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.09-1.31) and without Medicaid (adjusted HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.01-1.27). OS was worse in Medicaid vs without Medicaid, with no significant OS difference between races. TI was significantly lower for Black vs White VHA patients (adjusted OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.61-0.92), with no significant OS difference between races.

Guideline-recommended TI was low for all patients with mCSPC, with less TI in Black patients in both Medicare and the VHA. Black race was associated with worse OS in Medicare but not the VHA. Medicaid patients had less TI and worse OS than those without Medicaid, suggesting poverty and race are associated with care and outcomes.

Genetic testing, to identify pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in prostate cancer, is valuable in guiding treatment decisions for men with prostate cancer and to inform cancer prevention and early detection options for their immediate blood relatives. There are various guidelines and consensus statements for genetic testing in prostate cancer. Our aim is to review genetic testing recommendations across current guidelines and consensus statements and the level of evidence supporting those recommendations.

A scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Electronic database searches and manual searches of grey literature, including websites of key organisations were conducted. Using the Population, Concept, Context (PCC) framework, this scoping review included: men with prostate cancer or men at high risk of prostate cancer and their biological families; existing guidelines and consensus statements with supporting evidence for genetic testing of men with prostate cancer from any geographical location worldwide.

Of the 660 citations identified, 23 guidelines and consensus statements met the inclusion criteria for the scoping review. Based on different levels of evidence about who should be tested and how, a diverse range of recommendations were identified. There was general consensus among the guidelines and consensus statements that men with metastatic disease be offered genetic testing; however, there was less consensus in relation to genetic testing in localised prostate cancer. While there was some consensus in relation to which genes to test, recommendations varied regarding who to test, testing methods and implementation.

While genetic testing in prostate cancer is routinely recommended and numerous guidelines exist, there is still considerable lack of consensus regarding who should be tested and how they should be tested. Further evidence is needed to inform value-based genetic testing strategies for implementation in practice.

The definition of "non-metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer" (nmHSPC) can be applied to patients with prostate cancer (PC) who are androgen-deprivation therapy-naïve and without evidence of metastatic disease. This definition includes heterogeneous situations; however, PC patients at high risk of metastatic spread - and who have not started a hormonal treatment - constitute a unique category with unmet clinical needs. This narrative review critically discusses the advances that characterize the rapidly evolving diagnostic and therapeutic scenario in the nmHSPC setting. We found that nmHSPC represents a grey zone in the context of PC. New clinical trials are trying to redefine the therapeutic algorithm of these patients, but escalating treatment seems not to be the right choice for the overall population. Biomarkers able to stratify patients - including molecular ones - are urgently needed, and biomarker-based clinical trials could clarify their prognostic and predictive role in the nmHSPC scenario.

The clinical rationale for treatment of castration-sensitive prostate cancer (CSPC) with novel hormonal therapy (NHT) or androgen receptor pathway inhibitor is reviewed. A PubMed search was conducted to identify relevant publications on NHTs for CSPC treatment. Level 1 clinical evidence demonstrated that intensification of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with NHT prolongs life and improves or maintains quality of life in patients with metastatic CSPC (mCSPC). Despite these results, real-world evidence demonstrated that 47%-88% of patients with mCSPC are treated with single agent ADT. Possible explanations for the underutilization of NHTs include patient characteristics, misperceptions about the overall survival benefit, lack of physician and patient awareness of the magnitude of clinical trial results, physician bias, safety concerns, misconceptions about the magnitude of prostate-specific antigen response needed for patient improvement, and barriers to NHT access. For patients with biochemical recurrence and no evidence of metastatic disease, limited clinical data exist with no consensus on an effective treatment strategy. Therefore, treatment strategies are developed using patient risk stratification according to clinicopathological characteristics, genomics, and next-generation imaging. Patients with high-risk biochemical recurrence may benefit from the early initiation of NHT based on outcomes from the phase III EMBARK trial. Lifestyle management is also an important aspect of treatment for CSPC, helping to mitigate the side effects of hormonal treatment and ensuring patients can maintain treatment while optimizing quality of life. In conclusion, to improve outcomes in patients with mCSPC, it is important to implement solutions addressing the barriers to underutilization of treatment intensification.

Optimal patient management protocols for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) are poorly defined and even further complexified with new therapy approvals, such as radiopharmaceuticals. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted agent 177Lu vipivotide tetraxetan ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), approved after the phase III VISION study, presents physicians with additional aspects of patient management, including specific adverse event (AE) monitoring and management, as well as radiation safety. Drawing on our experience as VISION study investigators, here we provide guidance on best practices for delivering PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) to patients with mCRPC. After a comprehensive review of published evidence and guidelines on RPT management in prostate cancer, we identified educational gaps in managing the radiation safety and AEs associated with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617. Our results showed that providing sufficient education on AEs (e.g., fatigue and dry mouth) and radiation safety principles is key to effective delivery and management of patient expectations. Patient counseling by health care professionals, across disciplines, is a cornerstone of optimal patient management during PSMA-targeted RPT. Multidisciplinary collaboration is crucial, and physicians must adhere to radiation safety protocols and counsel patients on radiation safety considerations. Treatment with [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is generally well tolerated; however, additional interventions may be required, such as dosing modification, medications, or transfusions. Urinary incontinence can be challenging in the context of radiation safety. Multidisciplinary collaboration between medical oncologists and nuclear medicine teams ensures that patients are monitored and managed safely and efficiently. In clinical practice, the benefit-to-risk ratio should always be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Unfortunately, not all metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receive available life-prolonging systemic therapies, emphasizing the need to optimize mCRPC treatment selections. Better guidelines are necessary to determine genetic testing in prostate cancer.

In this two-part expert opinion-based guide, we provide an expert consensus opinion on the utilization of germline and somatic testing to detect HRR alterations in patients with mCRPC. This guide was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel that convened in 2023-2024, including representatives from medical oncology, urology, radiation oncology, pathology, medical genomics, and basic science.

We argue for the widespread adoption of germline testing in all patients with prostate cancer and for somatic mutations testing in patients at the time of recurrent/metastatic disease. In this first part, we review how genomic testing is performed. We also review how to overcome certain barriers to integrate genetic and biomarker testing into clinical practice.

Unfortunately, not all metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receive available life-prolonging systemic therapies, emphasizing the need to optimize mCRPC treatment selections. Better guidelines are necessary to determine genetic testing for prostate cancer.

In this two-part expert opinion-based guide, we provide an expert consensus opinion on the utilization of germline and somatic testing to detect HRR alterations in patients with mCRPC. This guide was developed by a multidisciplinary expert panel that convened in 2023-2024, including representatives from medical oncology, urology, radiation oncology, pathology, medical genomics, and basic science.

In this second part, we highlight how genetic testing can lead to improved, life-prolonging mCRPC therapeutic strategies based on a review of the recent phase III trials and subsequent regulatory approvals for PARP inhibitors in mCRPC.

The natural history of biochemical recurrence (BCR) managed with delayed hormonal therapy is well documented by data from Johns Hopkins. However, as many patients receive treatment prior to metastasis, we evaluated the natural history and role of prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSADT) in a more contemporary cohort of BCR patients with nonmetastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (nmCSPC).

Patients in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA; 01/01/06 to 06/22/20) with nmCSPC and BCR were divided into rapid ( ≤9 months) and less rapid ( >9 to ≤15 months) PSADT cohorts. Patients with PSADT >15 months were excluded as outcomes, even with delayed treatment, are excellent. Outcomes included time to first antineoplastic therapy after BCR, metastasis, metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox models adjusted for baseline demographics and clinical characteristics.

Overall, 781 patients with BCR were identified (502 rapid; 279 less rapid PSADT). Rapid PSADT was associated with shorter time to first systemic antineoplastic therapy (median 11.4 vs. 28.3 months, adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.17 [1.83-2.57]), metastasis (102.4 months vs. not reached, 1.79 [1.33-2.40]), MFS (76.1 vs. 106.3 months, 1.73 [1.33-2.24]), and OS (120.5 vs. 140.5 months, 1.76 [1.22-2.54]) versus less rapid PSADT.

Most patients with rapid PSADT underwent secondary treatment within 1 year after BCR. More contemporary patients treated with early secondary treatment had better outcomes than historical data from patients who had delayed treatment. Whether these results reflect the benefits of early secondary treatment or overall improvements in prostate cancer outcomes over time requires further study.

Alterations in DNA damage repair genes in advanced prostate cancer (PC) may impact responses to therapy and clinical outcomes. This study described homologous recombination repair (HRR) testing patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by HRR alteration status and race in the United States (US).

Clinical data in the nationwide (US-based) Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine, Inc. (FMI) Metastatic PC Clinico-Genomic Database were evaluated (01/01/2011-12/31/2022). Patients initiating first-line (1L) mCRPC therapy on or after mCRPC diagnosis were included. Testing patterns, time-to-next treatment, overall survival (OS), and time-to-prostate specific antigen response were described.

Of the 1367 patients with mCRPC and at least one HRR panel test prior to or on the date of 1L mCRPC therapy initiation, 332 (24.3%) were HRR positive (White patients: n = 219 [66.0%]; Black patients: n = 37 [11.1%]) and 1035 (75.7%) were HRR negative (White patients: n = 702 [67.8%]; Black patients: n = 84 [8.1%]). The mean time between first positive test and 1L mCRPC therapy initiation date was 588 days (White patients: 589 days; Black patients: 639 days). Among HRR positive relative to negative patients, trends for faster progression (respective 12-month rate overall: 71.1% and 63.7%; White patients: 72.5% and 64.0%; Black patients: 65.4% and 56.4%), shorter OS (respective 24-month rate overall: 46.8% and 51.9%; White patients: 48.6% and 46.2%; Black patients: 52.8% and 54.1%), and decreased treatment response (respective 12-month rate overall: 24.3% and 37.9%; White patients: 24.5% and 35.2%; Black patients: 17.0% and 43.9%) were observed.

Patients with mCRPC positive for HRR alterations tended to exhibit poorer treatment responses and clinical outcomes than those with a negative status. These findings highlight the importance of timely genetic testing in mCRPC, particularly among Black patients, and the need for improved 1L targeted therapies to address the unmet need in HRR positive mCRPC.

The objective of this review is to provide an overview of common drug-drug interactions (DDIs) associated with prostate cancer treatments and outline recommendations for managing polypharmacy.

A literature search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL was carried out to identify pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes caused by DDIs that are relevant for prostate cancer patients, DDIs between prostate cancer therapies and co-administered medications (both prescription and over-the-counter), and measures to prevent DDIs. Medication package inserts were used to identify the impact of DDI on the prostate cancer therapy and suggested interventions.

No DDIs are expected for the LHRH agonists leuprolide acetate, histrelin, goserelin, or leuprolide mesylate. However, DDIs have been reported for GnRH antagonists, anti-androgens, PARP inhibitors, and taxanes. Although there are no confirmed DDIs for sipuleucel-T to date, it is not generally recommended to use sipuleucel-T concurrently with immunosuppressive medications. Interventions to prevent DDIs include the use of software that can detect clinically significant DDIs, up-to-date medication reconciliation, the inclusion of dedicated clinical pharmacists in cancer treatment teams, and patient/caregiver education.

Prostate cancer patients have a high risk of potential DDIs due to numerous new anti-cancer therapies, the increased use of treatment combinations, and the likelihood of comorbid conditions also requiring drug therapy. Drug-drug interaction screening software, up-to-date medication reconciliation, inclusion of oncology pharmacists on healthcare teams, and patient/caregiver education will aid the development of treatment plans that focus on achieving an optimal risk-benefit profile whilst reducing the risk of DDIs.

There are many FDA-approved drugs for advanced prostate cancer (PC), yet public interest in these drugs is not well understood. We compared public interest and state-level predictors of interest in five common oral adjunctive hormonal therapies.

Google Trends™ was queried for: "Enzalutamide", "Abiraterone Acetate", "Bicalutamide", "Apalutamide", and "Darolutamide" in the United States from January 2004 to November 2022. Data are presented as relative search index (RSI) by month. RSI ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being peak popularity, 50 being half of the peak popularity, and 0 representing insufficient data to be determined.

Several drugs abruptly increased in popularity following FDA approval including abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide. All drugs decreased in popularity from January 2020 to July 2020, corresponding with the COVID-19 pandemic. In the most recent 5 years, enzalutamide and abiraterone were the most common searched drugs, with bicalutamide a close 3rd place. States that did not expand Medicaid were significantly more likely to have bicalutamide as the top search drug vs. states that expanded Medicaid (p = 0.012). Across all states with data (n = 39), higher bicalutamide RSIs were significantly associated with lower household income (r = 0.385, p = 0.02) and greater percent of uninsured adults (r = 0.426, p = 0.007). This is the first study using Google Trends to compare advanced PC drugs by search popularity.

Despite the emergence of more effective medications, bicalutamide remains relatively popular, particularly in states with lower household income, more uninsured adults, or those that did not expand Medicaid, possibly due to its lower cost.

Background: The use of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors, including apalutamide, in combination with androgen deprivation therapy is recommended for the treatment of metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Objective: To describe real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients with mCSPC or nmCRPC who initiated apalutamide in the United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients with mCSPC or nmCRPC who initiated apalutamide was conducted using electronic medical record data from US community-based urology practices (Feb. 1, 2017-April 1, 2022). Persistence with apalutamide was reported at 6-, 12-, and 18-months post treatment initiation. Clinical outcomes described up to 24 months after apalutamide initiation using Kaplan-Meier analyses included progression to castration resistance, castration resistance-free survival (CRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Outcomes were reported separately based on mCSPC or nmCRPC status and race (ie, Black or non-Black). Results: This study included 589 patients with mCSPC (mean age, 75.9 years) and 406 patients with nmCRPC (mean age, 78.8 years). Using a treatment gap of >90 days, persistence with apalutamide at 12 months remained high for both the mCSPC (94.9%) and nmCRPC (92.7%) cohorts, and results were descriptively similar among Black and non-Black patients, and when a treatment gap of >60 days was considered. In patients with mCSPC, overall progression to castration resistance rates at 12 and 24 months were 20.9% and 33.5%, and overall CRFS rates were 76.2% and 62.0%, respectively. In patients with nmCRPC, overall MFS rates at 12 and 24 months were 89.7% and 75.4%, respectively. Rates of these clinical outcomes were descriptively similar between Black and non-Black patients. Discussion: While clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of apalutamide, there is limited real-world data describing treatment persistence and clinical outcomes among patients with mCSPC and nmCRPC who initiated apalutamide. Conclusions: In this real-world study of patients with mCSPC or nmCRPC initiated on apalutamide, treatment persistence was high and apalutamide demonstrated robust real-world effectiveness with respect to progression to castration resistance, CRFS, and MFS, overall and among Black and non-Black patients.

The ARASENS trial recruited 1306 men with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer. It investigated the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and systemic therapy docetaxel in combination with a third novel drug - daralutamide, compared with placebo on overall survival. Triple therapy with ADT, docetaxel and darolutamide resulted in improved overall survival rates as compared with ADT, docetaxel and placebo (HR 0.68; 95% CI, 0.57-0.80; p < 0.001). The side effect profile for both treatments was similar. This randomised, double blinded, placebo controlled study, was assessed to have a low risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool.

Injectable extended-release formulations of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa) have simplified the treatment of prostate cancer with a satisfactory level of androgen castration. This study aims to determine the percentage of patients whose initial LHRHa prescription was renewed during follow-up, how many changed formulation and how their quality of life evolved.

This is an observational, prospective, multicentre study of men with prostate cancer who were to receive treatment with LHRHa (triptorelin every 3 or 6 months, leuprorelin every 3 or 6 months, or goserelin every 3 months) for 24 months. The treatment used was recorded and quality of life was assessed (QLQ-PR25 questionnaire) at four follow-up visits.

A total of 497 men (median age 75 years) were evaluated. The median exposure to LHRHa was 24 months. The initial prescription was renewed in 95.7% at follow-up 1 and 75% at follow-up 4. The main reason for changing from a 6-month to a 3-month formulation was a preference for sequential treatment (according to the investigator) and to see the physician more frequently (according to the patient). The main reason for switching from the 3-month to 6-month formulation was simplification of treatment (according to the investigator) and for convenience (according to the patient). Findings in the QLQ-PR25 questionnaire revealed no changes in urinary or bowel symptoms, though an improvement in sexual activity was reported. Practically all investigators and patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the treatment.

Changes in formulation were scarce and generally justified by convenience factors or personal preferences. Patients maintained a good health status, with a high rate of retention of LHRHa treatment.

Study number: A-ES-52014-224.A plain language summary is provided as supplementary material (available at: https://www.drugsincontext.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/dic.2024-2-2-Suppl.pdf).

Prostate cancer represents the second most prevalent form of cancer found in males, and stands as the fifth primary contributor to cancer-induced mortality on a global scale. Research has shown that transplanted mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can migrate by homing to tumor sites in the body. In prostate cancer, researchers have explored the fact that MSC-based therapies (including genetically modified delivery vehicles or vectors) and MSC-derived exosomes are emerging as attractive options to improve the efficacy and safety of traditional cancer therapies. In addition, researchers have reported new insights into the application of extracellular vesicle (EV)-MSC therapy as a novel treatment option that could provide a more effective and targeted approach to prostate cancer treatment. Moreover, the new generation of exosomes, which contain biologically functional molecules as signal transducers between cells, can simultaneously deliver different therapeutic agents and induce an anti-tumor phenotype in immune cells and their recruitment to the tumor site. The results of the current research on the use of MSCs in the treatment of prostate cancer may be helpful to researchers and clinicians working in this field. Nevertheless, it is crucial to emphasize that although dual-role MSCs show promise as a therapeutic modality for managing prostate cancer, further investigation is imperative to comprehensively grasp their safety and effectiveness. Ongoing clinical trials are being conducted to assess the viability of MSCs in the management of prostate cancer. The results of these trials will help determine the viability of this approach. Based on the current literature, engineered MSCs-EV offer great potential for application in targeted tumor therapy.

Nearly one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary definitive treatment. BCR increases the risk of distant metastasis and mortality in patients with prognostically unfavorable features. These patients are best managed with a tailored treatment strategy incorporating risk stratification using clinicopathological factors, next-generation imaging, and genomic testing.

This narrative review examines the utility of risk stratification for the management of patients with BCR in the context of clinical trial data, referencing the latest recommendations by European and US medical societies.

PubMed was searched for relevant studies published through May 21 2023 on treatment of patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

European and US guidelines support the risk-stratified management of BCR. Post-RP, salvage EBRT (with or without androgen deprivation therapy [ADT]) is an accepted treatment option for patients with BCR. Post-EBRT, local salvage therapies (RP, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound, stereotactic body radiotherapy, and low-dose-rate and high-dose-rate brachytherapy) have demonstrated comparable relapse-free survival rates but differing adverse event profiles, short and long term. Local salvage therapies should be used for local-only relapses while ADT should be considered for regional or distant relapses. In practice, patients often receive ADT, with varying guidance for intermittent ADT vs. continuous ADT, due to consideration of quality-of-life effects.

Despite a lack of consensus for BCR treatment among guideline associations and medical societies, risk stratification of patients is essential for personalized treatment approaches, as it allows for an informed selection of therapeutic strategies and estimation of adverse events. In lower-risk disease, observation is recommended while in higher-risk disease, after failed repeat local therapy, ADT and/or clinical trial enrollment may be appropriate. Results from ongoing clinical studies of patients with BCR should provide consensus for management.

Biochemical recurrence (BCR) following primary interventional treatment occurs in approximately one-third of patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Next-generation imaging (NGI) can identify local and metastatic recurrence with greater sensitivity than conventional imaging, potentially allowing for more effective interventions. This narrative review examines the current clinical evidence on the utility of NGI for patients with BCR.

A search of PubMed was conducted to identify relevant publications on NGI applied to BCR. Given other relevant recent reviews on the topic, this review focused on papers published between January 2018 to May 2023.

NGI technologies, including positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, have demonstrated increased sensitivity and selectivity for diagnosing BCR at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations <2.0 ng/ml. Detection rates range between 46% and 50%, with decreasing PSA levels for choline (1-3 ng/ml), fluciclovine (0.5-1 ng/ml), and prostate-specific membrane antigen (0.2-0.49 ng/ml) PET radiotracers. Expert working groups and European and US medical societies recommend NGI for patients with BCR.

Available data support the improved detection performance and selectivity of NGI modalities versus conventional imaging techniques; however, limited clinical evidence exists demonstrating the application of NGI to treatment decision-making and its impact on patient outcomes. The emergence of NGI and displacement of conventional imaging may require a reexamination of the current definitions of BCR, altering our understanding of early recurrence. Redefining the BCR disease state by formalizing the role of NGI in patient management decisions will facilitate greater alignment across research efforts and better reflect the published literature.

Lymphocele is one of the most common complications after radical prostatectomy. Multiple authors have proposed the use of vessel sealants or peritoneal interposition techniques as preventive interventions. This study aimed to aggregate and analyze the available literature on different interventions which seek to prevent lymphocele through a Bayesian Network. A systematic review was performed to identify prospective studies evaluating strategies for lymphocele prevention after robot assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection. Data was inputted into Review Manager 5.4 for pairwise meta-analysis. Data was then used to build a network in R Studio. These networks were used to model 200,000 Markov Chains via MonteCarlo sampling. The results are expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Meta-regression was used to determine coefficient of change and adjust for pelvic lymph node dissection extent. Ten studies providing data from 2211 patients were included. 1097 patients received an intervention and 1114 patients served as controls. Interposition with fenestration had the lowest risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.14 [0.04, 0.50], p = 0.003). All interventions, except sealants or patches, had significant decreased odds of lymphocele rates. Meta-analysis of all the included studies showed a decreased risk of developing a lymphocele (OR 0.42 [0.33, 0.53], p < 0.00001) for the intervention group. Perivesical fixation and interposition with fenestration appear to be effective interventions for reducing the overall incidence of lymphocele.

To analyze variables that can predict the positivity of 18F-DCFPyL- positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and extent of disease in patients with biochemically recurrent (BCR) prostate cancer after primary local therapy with either radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy.

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective single institutional review board-approved study. We included 199 patients with biochemical recurrence and negative conventional imaging after primary local therapies (radical prostatectomy n = 127, radiation therapy n = 72). All patients underwent 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine predictors of a positive scan for both cohort of patients. Regression-based coefficients were used to develop nomograms predicting scan positivity and extra-pelvic disease. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was implemented to quantify nomogram's clinical benefit.

Of the 127 (63%) post-radical prostatectomy patients, 91 patients had positive scans - 61 of those with intrapelvic lesions and 30 with extra-pelvic lesions (i.e., retroperitoneal or distant nodes and/or bone/organ lesions). Of the 72 post-radiation therapy patients, 65 patients had positive scans - 39 of them had intrapelvic lesions and 26 extra-pelvic lesions. In the radical prostatectomy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed original International Society of Urological Pathology category, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate-specific antigen doubling time (PSAdt), and time from BCR (mo) to scan were predictors for scan positivity and presence of extra-pelvic disease, with an area under the curve of 80% and 78%, respectively. Positive versus negative tumor margin after radical prostatectomy was not related to scan positivity or to the presence of positive extra-pelvic foci. In the radiation therapy cohort, multivariate regression analysis revealed that PSA, PSAdt, and time to BCR (mo) were predictors of extra-pelvic disease, with area under the curve of 82%. Because only seven patients in the radiation therapy cohort had negative scans, a prediction model for scan positivity could not be analyzed and only the presence of extra-pelvic disease was evaluated.

PSA and PSAdt are consistently significant predictors of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT positivity and extra-pelvic disease in BCR prostate cancer patients. Stratifying the patient population into primary local treatment group enables the use of other variables as predictors, such as time since BCR. This nomogram may guide selection of the most suitable candidates for 18F-DCFPyL-PET/CT imaging.

We compared radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) as local therapies for primary tumors and examined their associations with survival outcomes and urinary tract complications in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer (omPC).

We evaluated the data of 85 patients diagnosed with omPC who underwent local therapy for primary tumors between January 2008 and December 2018. Of the 85 patients, 31 underwent prostate RT, while 54 underwent RP. Oligometastatic disease was defined as the presence of fewer than five metastatic lesions without visceral metastasis. Urinary tract complications, progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses.

Patients treated with RT showed higher prostate-specific antigen levels. There was no significant difference in the 5-year PFS (52.5% vs. 37.9%, p=0.351), CSS (67.6% vs. 84.7%, p=0.473), or OS (63.6% vs. 73.8%, p=0.897) between the RT and RP groups. In the multivariate analyses, the type of local therapy was not associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.334, p=0.356), CSS (HR=0.744, p=0.475), or OS (HR=0.953, p=0.897).

Therefore, RP seems to be a possible treatment option for patients with omPC, exhibiting oncologic outcomes comparable to those with RT.

The Prostate Imaging for Recurrence Reporting (PI-RR) system has been recently proposed to promote standardisation in the MR assessment of prostate cancer (PCa) local recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiation therapy (RT). This study aims to evaluate PI-RR's diagnostic accuracy, assess the inter-observer reliability among readers with variable experience, and correlate imaging results with anatomopathological and laboratory parameters.

Patients who underwent a pelvic MRI for suspicion of PCa local recurrence after RP or RT were retrospectively enrolled (October 2017-February 2020). PI-RR scores were independently assessed for each patient by five readers with variable experience in prostate MRI (two senior and three junior radiologists). Biochemical data and histopathological features were collected. The reference standard was determined through biochemical, imaging, or histopathological follow-up data. Reader's diagnostic performance was assessed using contingency tables. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to measure inter-observer reliability.

The final cohort included 120 patients (median age, 72 years [IQR, 62-82]). Recurrence was confirmed in 106 (88.3%) patients. Considering a PI-RR score ≥ 3 as positive for recurrence, minimum and maximum diagnostic values among the readers were as follows: sensitivity 79-86%; specificity 64-86%; positive predictive value 95-98%; negative predictive value 33-46%; accuracy 79-87%. Regardless of reader's level of experience, the inter-observer reliability resulted good or excellent (κ ranges across all readers: 0.52-0.77), and ICC was 0.8. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity, baseline-PSA, and trigger-PSA resulted predictive of local recurrence at imaging.

The PI-RR system is an effective tool for MRI evaluation of PCa local recurrence and facilitates uniformity among radiologists.

This study confirmed the PI-RR system's good diagnostic accuracy for the MRI evaluation of PCa local recurrences. It showed high reproducibility among readers with variable experience levels, validating it as a promising standardisation tool for assessing patients with biochemical recurrence.

• In this retrospective study, the PI-RR system revealed promising diagnostic performances among five readers with different experience (sensitivity 79-86%; specificity 64-86%; accuracy 79-87%). • The inter-observer reliability among the five readers resulted good or excellent (κ ranges: 0.52-0.77) with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.8. • The PI-RR assessment score may facilitate standardisation and generalizability in the evaluation of prostate cancer local recurrence among radiologists.

The optimal management of node-positive (pN1) prostate cancer following radical prostatectomy (RP) remains uncertain. Despite randomized evidence, utilization of immediate, life-long androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remains poor, and recent trials of early salvage radiotherapy included only a minority of pN1 patients. We therefore emulated a hypothetical pragmatic trial of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation in men with pN1 prostate cancer.

Using the RADICALS-RT trial to inform the design of a hypothetical trial, we identified men aged 50-69 years with pT2-3 Rany pN1 M0, pre-treatment PSA < 50 ng/mL prostate cancer in the NCDB from 2006 to 2015 treated with 60-72 Gy of adjuvant RT (aRT) ± ADT within 26 weeks of RP or observation. After estimating a propensity score for receipt of aRT, we estimated absolute and relative treatment effects using stabilized inverse probability of treatment (sIPW) re-weighting.

In total, 3510 patients were included in the study, of whom 587 (17%) received aRT (73% with concurrent ADT). Median follow-up was 40.0 -months, during which 333 deaths occurred. After sIPW re-weighting, baseline characteristics were well-balanced. Adjusted overall survival (OS) was 93% versus 89% at 5-years and 82% versus 79% at 7-years for aRT versus observation (p = 0.11). In IPW-reweighted Cox regression, aRT was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (ACM) than observation, but this did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.70 p = 0.06). In analyses examining heterogeneity of treatment effects, aRT was associated with improved ACM only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease (HR 0.59, p = 0.01), ≥2 positive LNs (HR 0.49, p = 0.04 for 2 positive LNs; HR 0.42, p = 0.01 for ≥3 positive LNs), or negative surgical margins (HR 0.50, p = 0.02).

In observational analyses designed to emulate a hypothetical target trial of aRT versus observation in pN1 prostate cancer, aRT was associated with improved OS only for men with Gleason 8-10 disease, ≥2 positive LNs, or negative surgical margins.

Piflufolastat F 18 is a novel prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer that is superior to standard of care (SOC) imaging for the initial staging of prostate cancer and the detection of biochemical recurrence. As piflufolastat F 18 has been approved in the United States (US) for this indication, this modeling study assessed the cost effectiveness of piflufolastat F 18 versus fluciclovine F-18, gallium68-PSMA-11 (PSMA 11), and SOC imaging (a mix of bone scans, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) for the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer from a US healthcare system perspective.

A US third-party payer perspective was used, which for this population reflects a mix of commercial and Medicare, considering only direct healthcare costs.

This study utilized a tertiary healthcare setting.

A decision tree was used to map the diagnostic/treatment pathway, consisting of the proportion of patients with local, regional, distant, or no disease; prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 1.0 or > 1.0; and accuracy of imaging modalities. A Markov model predicted the long-term outcomes of disease progression according to treatment decisions. Inputs to the model were informed by data from the OSPREY and CONDOR clinical trials, public data, and the literature. Treatment mix included active surveillance, radiation therapy, prostatectomy, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and radiation therapy + ADT, informed by expert opinion. Outcomes included life-years (LY), quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). All costs were reported in 2021 US dollars, using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $150,000 was considered cost effective, consistent with the upper range used as the standard for price benchmarks by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. The robustness of the base-case results was assessed in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

Over a lifetime horizon, piflufolastat F 18 had the greatest effectiveness in terms of LYs (6.80) and QALYs (5.33); for the comparators, LYs ranged from 6.58 (SOC) to 6.76 (PSMA 11) and QALYs ranged from 5.12 (SOC) and 5.30 (PSMA 11). Piflufolastat F 18 was more cost effective compared with fluciclovine F 18, PSMA 11, and SOC, with ICERs of $21,122, $55,836, and $124,330 per QALY gained, respectively. Piflufolastat F 18 was associated with the greatest net monetary benefit ($627,918) compared with the other options at a WTP threshold of $150,000. The results of the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the base-case results.

This study suggests that piflufolastat F 18 is a cost-effective diagnostic option for men with prostate cancer in the US, with higher associated LY, QALY, and greater net monetary benefit than fluciclovine F 18, PSMA 11, and SOC imaging.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) as a transmembrane protein is overexpressed by prostate cancer (PC) cells and is accessible for binding antibodies or low-molecular-weight radioligands due to its extracellular portion. Successful targeting of PSMA began with the development of humanized J591 antibody. Due to their faster clearance compared to antibodies, small-molecule radioligands for targeted imaging and therapy of PC have been favored in recent development efforts. PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has higher diagnostic performance than conventional imaging for initial staging of high-risk PC and biochemical recurrence detection/localization. However, it remains to be demonstrated how to integrate PSMA PET imaging for therapy response assessment and as an outcome endpoint measure in clinical trials. With the recent approval of 177Lu-PSMA-617 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic castration-resistant PC progressing after chemotherapy, the high value of PSMA-targeted therapy was confirmed. Compared to standard of care, PSMA-based radioligand therapy led to a better outcome and a higher quality of life. This review, focusing on the advanced PC setting, provides an overview of different approved and nonapproved PSMA-targeted imaging and therapeutic modalities and discusses the future of PSMA-targeted theranostics, also with an outlook on non-radiopharmaceutical-based PSMA-targeted therapies.

Prostate cancer (PC) has a serious public health impact, and its incidence is rising due to the aging population. There is limited evidence and consensus to guide the management of PC in Southeast Asia (SEA). We present real-world data on clinical practice patterns in SEA for advanced PC care.

A paper-based survey was used to identify clinical practice patterns and obtain consensus among the panelists. The survey included the demographics of the panelists, the use of clinical guidelines, and clinical practice patterns in the management of advanced PC in SEA.

Most panelists (81%) voted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as the most effective test for early PC diagnosis and risk stratification. Nearly 44% of panelists agreed that prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging for PC diagnostic and staging information aids local and systemic therapy decisions. The majority of the panel preferred abiraterone acetate (67%) or docetaxel (44%) as first-line therapy for symptomatic mCRPC patients. Abiraterone acetate (50%) is preferred over docetaxel as a first-line treatment in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer patients with high-volume disease. However, the panel did not support the use of abiraterone acetate in non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) patients. Apalutamide (75%) is the preferred treatment option for patients with nmCRPC. The cost and availability of modern treatments and technologies are important factors influencing therapeutic decisions. All panelists supported the use of generic versions of approved therapies.

The survey results reflect real-world management of advanced PC in a SEA country. These findings could be used to guide local clinical practices and highlight the financial challenges of modern healthcare.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a widespread malignancy, predominantly affecting elderly males, and current methods for diagnosis and treatment of this disease continue to fall short. The marker Ki-67 (MKI67) has been previously demonstrated to correlate with the proliferation and metastasis of various cancer cells, including those of PCa. Hence, verifying the association between MKI67 and the diagnosis and prognosis of PCa, using bioinformatics databases and clinical data analysis, carries significant clinical implications.

To explore the diagnostic and prognostic efficacy of antigens identified by MKI67 expression in PCa.

For cohort 1, the efficacy of MKI67 diagnosis was evaluated using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases. For cohort 2, the diagnostic and prognostic power of MKI67 expression was further validated using data from 271 patients with clinical PCa.

In cohort 1, MKI67 expression was correlated with prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason Score, T stage, and N stage. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve showed a strong diagnostic ability, and the Kaplan-Meier method demonstrated that MKI67 expression was negatively associated with the progression-free interval (PFI). The time-ROC curve displayed a weak prognostic capability for MKI67 expression in PCa. In cohort 2, MKI67 expression was significantly related to the Gleason Score, T stage, and N stage; however, it was negatively associated with the PFI. The time-ROC curve revealed the stronger prognostic capability of MKI67 in patients with PCa. Multivariate COX regression analysis was performed to select risk factors, including PSA level, N stage, and MKI67 expression. A nomogram was established to predict the 3-year PFI.

MKI67 expression was positively associated with the Gleason Score, T stage, and N stage and showed a strong diagnostic and prognostic ability in PCa.