Amiodarone is a benzofuran class III antiarrhythmic drug used to treat a wide spectrum of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. The parenteral formulation is prepared in polysorbate 80 diluent. We report an unusual case of acute elevation of aminotransaminase concentrations after the initiation of intravenous amiodarone. An 88-year-old Caucasian female developed acute hepatitis and renal failure after initiating intravenous amiodarone for atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response in the setting of acutely decompensated heart failure and hepatic congestion. Liver transaminases returned to baseline within 7 days after discontinuing the drug. Researchers hypothesized that this type of injury is related to liver ischemia with possible superimposed direct drug toxicity. The CIOMS/RUCAM scale identifies our patient's acute hepatitis as a highly probable adverse drug reaction. Future research is needed to understand the mechanisms by which hyperacute drug toxicity occurs in the setting of impaired hepatic perfusion and venous congestion.

The number of patients receiving amiodarone will increase in future years. As clinically significant hepatotoxicity associated with oral amiodarone is infrequent and difficult to predict, a new Bayesian-developed model is proposed to help in the causality assessment of amiodarone-induced liver injury.

Incidence of abnormal liver enzymes in patients receiving amiodarone was obtained from placebo controlled clinical trials. Published case reports of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity were identified through a literature search. Maximum number of expected hepatotoxicity cases in amiodarone and placebo-treated patients was calculated using Poisson distribution. The calculated odds ratio was used as a Prior Odds (PrO) to subsequent quantification, using a Bayesian-approach, of individual amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity likelihood.

PrO of amiodarone-induced hepatotoxicity was 0.48. Thirty nine amiodarone-associated hepatotoxicity case reports were retrieved. Half of published case reports developed an irreversible damage. The amiodarone Bayesian model combining information about latency period and period of remission, together with analytical parameters properly defines the toxicity profile shown in published case reports. The analytical pattern defined by this model is different from the one expected if liver injury in published cases was caused by other etiologies.

A method based on a Bayesian-approach, which links information from clinical trials with clinical hepatotoxicity profile from published case reports can be a useful tool for amiodarone-induced liver injury causality assessment. At present, this method is limited due to scarcity and quality of available data. Further efforts are needed to improve model ability in order to identify amiodarone-induced liver injury.

Hepatocellular toxicity is a putative side-effect of amiodarone. The hepatic detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase-A1-1 (GSTA1-1) is a sensitive indicator of hepatocellular damage. We investigated the occurrence of subclinical liver injury, as measured by plasma GSTA1-1 in intensive care unit patients with atrial fibrillation receiving amiodarone. Sixteen haemodynamically stable intensive care unit patients with atrial fibrillation were treated with amiodarone intravenously. Patients were given a loading dose of 150 mg followed by another 150 mg followed by a continuous infusion of 1200 mg/hour if atrial fibrillation persisted. Blood samples for GSTA1-1 (measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) were taken at zero, one, three, six, 12 and 24 hours, transaminases and bilirubin at zero, six, 12 and 24 hours. Blood pressure and heart rate were continuously monitored. Effects were analysed for time-dependent changes (one-way analysis of variance for repeated measures). Blood pressure increased from 125 +/- 8/60 +/- 3 mmHg at t = 0 to 144 +/- 9/66 +/- 4 mmHg at t = 24 hours (P < 0.05), heart rate decreased from atrial fibrillation 124 +/- 5 to sinus rhythm 86 +/- 6 beats per minute (P < 0.05). There was no significant elevation of GSTA1-1, transaminases or bilirubin during the observation period of 24 hours. Amiodarone does not cause elevation of GSTA1-1 as a marker of subclinical liver injury in haemodynamically stable intensive care unit patients with atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia after cardiac surgery. Amiodarone can effectively prevent and control postoperative atrial and ventricular fibrillation. Acute hepatic damage after intravenous amiodarone, which can be fatal, is not well recognized. We describe three cases of acute hepatocellular injury after intravenous amiodarone administration in critically ill patients. Another 25 published cases and six cases reported to the Swiss Pharmacovigilance Center (Swissmedic) are discussed.

This study consisted of a series of three case reports and review of the literature.

: This study was conducted at an operative critical care unit at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland.

Three hemodynamically compromised patients after open heart surgery developed significant increases of transaminases (up to more than 100-fold of the upper limit of normal) shortly after the introduction of intravenous amiodarone. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENT: Cessation of intravenous amiodarone and of other potentially hepatotoxic drugs.

Liver parameters significantly improved or returned to normal in all three patients, even after start of oral amiodarone in two patients.

Amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic agent for the treatment and prevention of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Acute liver damage after intravenous amiodarone, possibly induced by the solubilizer polysorbate 80, is rare but potentially harmful. Amiodarone loading should therefore be adapted to the necessity of an immediate effect of the drug, and liver function should be monitored closely in critically ill patients. Oral maintenance therapy with amiodarone is possible, even in patients who developed liver disease during intravenous loading.

Hepatotoxicity due to chronic amiodarone (AD) use is well described. However, hepatitis occurring after acute administration of AD has only occasionally been reported and the pathologic findings in the liver in this condition have not been well characterized. We describe an idiosyncratic reaction, in a 40-year-old man after 6 weeks of oral AD therapy, consisting of acute hepatitis, which resolved after withdrawal of the drug. The liver biopsy showed clusters of cells with granular cytoplasm. These cells were characterized as macrophages, and phospholipid membranous inclusions were demonstrated ultrastructurally in the granular cells and in the hepatocytes. Pathologists and clinicians should be aware of this subtle histologic finding when looking for evidence to support AD hepatotoxicity.

Acute hepatitis for intravenous amiodarone is an uncommon problem with scarce appearances in medical literature. Sometimes, it has postulated that the vehicle of the intravenous preparation and not the active principle is the possible cause of this complication. We report a patient with fulminating hepatitis and severe encephalopathy following the administration of intravenous amiodarone. We present also the clinical evolution of the patient after reintroduction of oral amiodarone. In the end, we make a review of the associated literature with our case.

Amiodarone was introduced 30 years ago as an antianginal agent and subsequently has been used as an antiarrhythmic agent. This drug was initially used for patients with malignant ventricular arrhythmias; however, currently it is being used broadly for rate and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. At first, amiodarone was primarily used by cardiologists and today it is used throughout the medical profession. Amiodarone therapy can potentially result in a wide range of adverse effects. The majority of these adverse effects are dose related and reversible. The following is a review of the adverse effects and drug interactions of amiodarone along with recommendations for identification and management of these adverse effects.

This analysis of the morphology of suspected amiodarone (AD) liver disease is based on a study of liver specimens from 17 individuals. Changes similar to alcoholic liver injury were commonly seen. Steatosis, both macrovesicular and microvesicular, was the most frequent histopathologic feature. Ballooning of hepatocytes, Mallory bodies, and fibrosis were also common. Other changes included nuclear unrest, acidophilic bodies, foam cells, glycogenated nuclei, and portal inflammation. Characteristic lamellar lysosomal inclusion bodies representing phospholipidosis were found in two of 14 specimens studied ultrastructurally. These changes of pseudoalcoholic hepatitis and/or phospholipidosis were present in liver specimens from asymptomatic, anicteric patients with mild elevations in serum aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase values with or without hepatomegaly, as well as in patients with clinically overt symptoms of hepatotoxicity. Phospholipidosis appears to be a generalized systemic effect of cationic amphophilic compounds, such as AD. The cytotoxic pseudoalcoholic changes appear to be an independent phenomenon in susceptible patients, whom we speculate may have been unable or less able to metabolize AD through normal pathways. The true incidence of hepatic injury from AD remains to be determined from prospective evaluations of pretreatment and follow-up liver biopsies.

Although amiodarone is a highly effective antiarrhythmic agent, it has a high incidence of side effects, some of which can be serious or even lethal. With close monitoring, side effects can be found in essentially all patients, but fortunately most of these are mild and well tolerated. Furthermore, many will respond to dosage reduction in a relatively short period of time, ie, days to weeks, which is remarkable considering the long period of time amiodarone has been shown to persist in tissues. There is reasonable evidence that toxicity, particularly the early toxic manifestations with large loading dosages, can be favorably modified by reducing the dosage. Similarly, reducing the maintenance dosage will, in most instances, reduce or eliminate most toxic manifestations. The mechanisms of toxic effects are uncertain, but suggestive evidence exists for and against both an immunologic reaction and an intracellular lysosomal lipoidosis. Principles of use of amiodarone should include individualizing administration of dosages for each patient due to the unusual pharmacokinetic properties of this drug and continuous long-term attempts at using the lowest effective dosage. There are no definite tests that predict amiodarone efficacy or toxicity, but the serum level can be used as a rough guide of absorption and distribution in the attempt to minimize the maintenance dosage. No guidelines regarding screening tests for toxicity can be made at this time since great variability in these tests has been reported, and no evidence exists for their benefit in preventing adverse effects to amiodarone. However, follow-up testing at the intervals noted in the package insert are reasonable and important. The possibility of interactions with drugs already reported and with others not yet reported should always be kept in mind, and appropriate monitoring for clinical evidence of toxicity due to the concomitantly used drugs should be undertaken. Amiodarone can have a tremendous beneficial effect in the proper circumstances, but it is a drug that should command utmost respect because of its side effects and requires constant vigilance from any physician wishing to use it.

The prevalence of apparent amiodarone-related hepatic injury in 104 patients followed prospectively is compared to that reported in the literature. Asymptomatic elevation of serum aminotransferase levels was detected in approximately one-fourth of the patients, a figure similar to the average of reported cases. The frequency of extrahepatic organ toxicity was increased in patients with elevated levels. Symptomatic "hepatitis" developed in 3% of this series and in less than 1% of cases in the literature. Evidence of hepatic phospholipidosis and the development of pseudoalcoholic liver injury is most likely due to the biochemical effects of the drug and to possible metabolic idiosyncrasy, respectively. Serial blood enzyme measurements, as recommended by the manufacturer, may offer some protection against the development of more serious liver injury. However, levels of amiodarone may persist in various tissues for weeks to months following withdrawal, and stopping the drug does not guarantee the prompt reversal of any organ toxicity. Accordingly, the risks posed and benefits offered by amiodarone should be carefully weighed prior to discontinuing the drug, as the risk of sudden cardiac death may outweigh the hazards of ongoing hepatic, pulmonary or other toxicity.

It has become evident in the past few years that amiodarone, a powerful antiarrhythmic agent, induces considerable side effects. These may be due to an amiodarone-elicited lipid storage disease and to the iodine content of amiodarone, but might also be causally related to amiodarone-induced immune reactions. The latter possibility prompted us to develop a sensitive anti-amiodarone antibody detection assay based on the immunodot technique.

Sera were obtained from 10 untreated control subjects and 33 patients receiving amiodarone. Using serum dilutions of 1:500 and 1:1,000, the lower detection limit was 0.3 microgram/ml of anti-amiodarone antibodies as calculated from a simultaneously performed IgG standard curve.

Screening of sera from the untreated control subjects and amiodarone-treated patients revealed that the untreated subjects had no anti-amiodarone antibodies, that only one of 16 patients without clinical side effects had elevated anti-amiodarone antibodies, but that seven of 12 patients with amiodarone-induced thyroid disease and four of five patients with other side effects had elevated anti-amiodarone antibody titers (1.2 to 2.5 micrograms/ml). The combined evaluation of anti-amiodarone antibody titers and cumulative dose was found to be a highly reliable indicator of side effects, as all patients with more than 100-g cumulative dose of amiodarone and more than 0.6 microgram/ml of anti-amiodarone antibodies had side effects.

The detection of anti-amiodarone antibodies in patients with amiodarone-elicited side effects underscores the possible contribution of immunologic reactions to the development of certain side effects.

Amiodarone is believed to have caused acute hepatitis 24 hours after intravenous administration in two patients in whom no other alternative cause of hepatitis was found.