Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article
- Total Article Views (5843)
All Articles published online
|
Publishing Process of This Article
|
Feb 26, 2021 (publication date) through Dec 12, 2024
Times Cited of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Clinical Cases
ISSN
2307-8960
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
| For: | Emile SH. Interactive platform for peer review: A proposal to improve the current peer review system. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(6): 1247-1250 [PMID: 33644191 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i6.1247] |
|---|---|
| URL: | https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i6/1247.htm |
| Number | Citing Articles |
| 1 |
Li Liu, Qian Wang, Zong-Yuan Tan, Ning Cai. On novel peer review system for academic journals: analysis based on social computing. Nonlinear Dynamics 2023; 111(12): 11613 doi: 10.1007/s11071-023-08401-1
|
| 2 |
Colette Bilynsky. Preclinical Evidence Synthesis Facilitates Open Science. Journal of Science Policy & Governance 2024; 23(02) doi: 10.38126/JSPG230202
|
| 3 |
Andreas Beer, Daniel Hechler, Peer Pasternack. A Question of (Academic) Honour? Motivations for Member Participation in Advisory Boards in the German Science System. Higher Education Policy 2024; doi: 10.1057/s41307-024-00376-x
|
| 4 |
Paul SESTRAS. Importance of the peer review process in scientific publications - proposed way of working for a new journal. Nova Geodesia 2021; 1(1): 15 doi: 10.55779/ng1115
|
| 5 |
Sameh Hany Emile, Hytham K. S. Hamid, Semra Demirli Atici, Doga Nur Kosker, Mario Virgilio Papa, Hossam Elfeki, Chee Yang Tan, Alaa El-Hussuna, Steven D. Wexner. Types, limitations, and possible alternatives of peer review based on the literature and surgeons’ opinions via Twitter: a narrative review. Science Editing 2022; 9(1): 3 doi: 10.6087/kcse.257
|