Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Methodol. Dec 26, 2017; 7(4): 148-150
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v7.i4.148
Laparoscopic-extracorporeal surgery performed with a fixation device for adnexal masses complicating pregnancy: Report of two cases
Hanako Kasahara, Iwaho Kikuchi, Aya Otsuka, Yoko Tsuzuki, Michio Nojima, Koyo Yoshida
Hanako Kasahara, Iwaho Kikuchi, Aya Otsuka, Yoko Tsuzuki, Michio Nojima, Koyo Yoshida, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Chiba 279-0021, Japan
Author contributions: Kasahara H and Kikuchi I contributed equally to this work; Kasahara H, Kikuchi I, Otsuka A and Tsuzuki Y performed the research; Kikuchi I designed the research; Nojima M and Yoshida K conducted the research; Kasahara H wrote the paper.
Informed consent statement: Because the patients have moved, we could not contact them. Before the operation, we have got comprehensive agreement, so the IRB approved.
Conflict-of-interest statement: None.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Iwaho Kikuchi, MD, PhD, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Tomioka 2-1-1, Urayasu City, Chiba 279-0021, Japan. kikuchi@juntendo.ac.jp
Telephone: +81-47-3533111 Fax: +81-47-3520187
Received: January 16, 2017
Peer-review started: January 18, 2017
First decision: March 27, 2017
Revised: November 18, 2017
Accepted: December 1, 2017
Article in press: December 1, 2017
Published online: December 26, 2017
Processing time: 343 Days and 13.6 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Clinical diagnosis

Ovarian cyst (benign).

Differential diagnosis

Ovarian carcinoma, etc.

Imaging diagnosis

Magnetic resonance imaging findings as follows: Case 1: Mature cystic teratoma; Case 2: Endometrioma.

Pathological diagnosis

Case 1: Mature cystic teratoma; Case 2: Endometrioma.

Treatment

Surgical treatment.

Related reports

This manuscript was the first report about this device.

Experiences and lessons

In the case of a large ovarian tumor, this “ova-lead” was suggested to be useful.