Published online Dec 20, 2023. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v13.i5.475
Peer-review started: September 13, 2023
First decision: October 7, 2023
Revised: October 17, 2023
Accepted: November 3, 2023
Article in press: November 3, 2023
Published online: December 20, 2023
Processing time: 98 Days and 3.7 Hours
Israel has a high rate of Jewish immigration and a high prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The study of IBD among immigrants is of paramount importance for several compelling reasons. Immigration itself facilitates population growth and changes in demographics, thereby influencing prevalence trends. Moreover, immigration introduces individuals to new environments, dietary habits, hygiene practices, and lifestyle behaviors, which can significantly alter their risk of developing IBD as they assimilate into their host countries.
Investigating IBD among immigrants provides a unique opportunity to dissect the complex interplay between genetics, environment, and migration in disease development, especially if focusing on a specific ethnic group of immigrants with similar predisposition to IBD. In this study, we compared IBD rates between first-generation immigrants originating from countries of varying IBD risk vs Israel-born residents, focusing specifically on the Jewish population in an effort to narrow the genetic variation of IBD that is usually present in immigration cohorts, in an increasingly interconnected world.
We aimed to compare the rate of IBD in first-generation immigrants vs Israel-born residents using a nationwide cohort of patients with IBD. We also aimed to determine whether the duration of residence in Israel affects the rate of IBD in these immigrants. Finally, we aimed to examine whether the rate of IBD in immigrants is related to the IBD risk in their country of origin.
Patients with a diagnosis of IBD as of June 2020 were included from the validated Israeli IBD Research Nucleus cohort that includes 98% of the Israeli population. We stratified the immigration cohort by IBD risk according to country of origin, time period of immigration, and age group as of June 2020.
Of the 33544 Jewish patients that were ascertained, 18524 (55%) had Crohn’s disease and 15020 (45%) had ulcerative colitis (UC); 28394 (85%) were Israel-born and 5150 (15%) were immigrants. UC was more prevalent in immigrants (2717; 53%) than non-immigrants (12303, 43%, P < 0.001), especially in the < 1990 immigration period. The prevalence was higher in patients immigrating from countries with high risk for IBD (561.4/100000) than those originating from intermediate-/low-risk countries (514.3/100000; P < 0.001); non-immigrant prevalence was 528.9/100000. After adjusting for age, longer duration in Israel was associated with a higher point prevalence rate in June 2020 (high-risk origin: Immigration < 1990: 645.9/100000, ≥ 1990: 613.2/100000, P = 0.043; intermediate/low-risk origin: < 1990: 540.5/100000, ≥ 1990: 192.0/100000, P < 0.001).
Our focus on the Jewish population was aimed at narrowing the genetic variation of IBD that is usually present in immigration cohorts. We found that the prevalence rate was lower among patients from intermediate-and low-risk regions compared to patients from high-risk regions but in both, the prevalence increased in association with duration in Israel after immigration. This finding, especially among immigrants from intermediate- and low-risk countries, lends support toward the role of environmental factors in IBD pathogenesis in Israel.
Future studies should explore associations between immigration with time to IBD onset, and should examine specific environmental factors among immigrants to further our understanding of the elusive IBD etiology.