The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesiology is revolutionizing clinical practice by enhancing patient monitoring, improving risk assessment, and enabling personalized anesthetic care. This bibliometric analysis aims to evaluate publication trends, key contributors, and emerging translational pathways in AI research in anesthesiology, with special emphasis on clinical relevance, thematic clustering, and future application prospects.

Publications related to AI in anesthesiology from 2004 to 2024 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database, resulting in 658 articles. VOSviewer and CiteSpace were employed for the bibliometric analysis.

AI research in anesthesiology has experienced substantial growth, with a notable surge between 2019 and 2020. The United States leads in both publication volume and citation impact, reflecting its central role in advancing AI-driven innovations. Major journals such as Anesthesia and Analgesia and Anesthesiology play central roles in disseminating key findings. Keyword and journal cluster analyses revealed three major translational domains: real-time perioperative risk prediction (e.g., hypotension, mortality), AI-assisted ultrasound for regional anesthesia, and intelligent anesthesia monitoring systems. Despite progress, emerging concerns such as model interpretability, patient-centered outcomes, and multimodal data integration remain underexplored.

AI in anesthesiology is entering a phase of rapid interdisciplinary expansion, integrating clinical needs with computational innovation. Future research should prioritize the clinical validation of AI tools, foster stronger collaboration between computer scientists and anesthesiologists, and address unresolved translational gaps such as model interpretability and cross-modal data fusion.

Interest in artificial intelligence (AI) research in anesthesia is growing rapidly. However, there is a lack of bibliometric analysis to measure and analyze global scientific publications in this field. The aim of this study was to identify the hotspots and trends in AI research in anesthesia through bibliometric analysis.

English articles and reviews published from 2000 to 2023 were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database. The extracted data were summarized and analyzed using Microsoft Excel, and bibliometric analysis were conducted with VOSviewer software.

AI research literature in anesthesia has exhibited rapid growth in recent years. The United States leads in the number of publications and citations, with Stanford University as the most prolific institution. Hyung-Chul Lee is the author with the highest number of publications. The journal Anesthesiology is highly recognized and authoritative in this field. Recent keywords include "musculoskeletal pain", "precision medicine", "stratification", "images", "mean arterial pressure", " enhanced recovery after surgery", "frailty", "telehealth", "postoperative delirium" and "postoperative mortality" indicating hot topics in AI research in anesthesia.

Publications on AI research in the field of anesthesia have experienced rapid growth over the past two decades and are likely to continue increasing. Research areas such as depth of anesthesia (DOA) and drug infusion (including electroencephalography and deep learning), perioperative risk assessment and prediction (covering mean arterial pressure, frailty, postoperative delirium, and mortality), image classification and recognition (for applications such as ultrasound-guided nerve blocks, vascular access, and difficult airway assessment), and perioperative pain management (particularly musculoskeletal pain) have garnered significant attention. Additionally, topics such as precision medicine, enhanced recovery after surgery, and telehealth are emerging as new hotspots and future directions in this field.

Interest in the potential applications of artificial intelligence in medicine, anesthesiology, and the world at large has never been higher. The Anesthesia Research Council steering committee formed an anesthesiologist artificial intelligence expert workgroup charged with evaluating the current state of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology, providing examples of future artificial intelligence applications and identifying barriers to artificial intelligence progress. The workgroup's findings are summarized here, starting with a brief introduction to artificial intelligence for clinicians, followed by overviews of current and anticipated artificial intelligence-focused research and applications in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology's progress in artificial intelligence is compared to that of other medical specialties, and barriers to artificial intelligence development and implementation in our specialty are discussed. The workgroup's recommendations address stakeholders in policymaking, research, development, implementation, training, and use of artificial intelligence-based tools for perioperative care.

Interest in the potential applications of artificial intelligence in medicine, anesthesiology, and the world at large has never been higher. The Anesthesia Research Council steering committee formed an anesthesiologist artificial intelligence expert workgroup charged with evaluating the current state of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology, providing examples of future artificial intelligence applications and identifying barriers to artificial intelligence progress. The workgroup's findings are summarized here, starting with a brief introduction to artificial intelligence for clinicians, followed by overviews of current and anticipated artificial intelligence-focused research and applications in anesthesiology. Anesthesiology's progress in artificial intelligence is compared to that of other medical specialties, and barriers to artificial intelligence development and implementation in our specialty are discussed. The workgroup's recommendations address stakeholders in policymaking, research, development, implementation, training, and use of artificial intelligence-based tools for perioperative care.

Ultrasonography is commonly employed during thoracic regional anesthesia; however, its accuracy can be affected by factors such as obesity and poor penetration through the rib window. Needle-sized ultrasound transducers, known as intra-needle ultrasound (INUS) transducers, have been developed to detect the pleura and fascia using a one-dimensional radio frequency mode ultrasound signal. In this study, we aimed to use time-frequency analysis to characterize the pleural signal and develop an automated tool to identify the pleura during medical procedures.

We developed an INUS system and investigated the pleural signal it measured by establishing a phantom study, and an in vivo animal study. Signals from the pleura, endothoracic fascia, and intercostal muscles were analyzed. Additionally, we conducted time- and frequency-domain analyses of the pleural and alveolar signals.

We identified the unique characteristics of the pleura, including a flickering phenomenon, speckle-like patterns, and highly variable multi-band spectra in the ultrasound signal during the breathing cycle. These characteristics are likely due to the multiple reflections from the sliding visceral pleura and alveoli. This automated identification of the pleura can enhance the safety for thoracic regional anesthesia, particularly in difficult cases.

The unique flickering pleural signal based on INUS can be processed by time-frequency domain analysis and further tracked by an auto-identification algorithm. This technique has potential applications in thoracic regional anesthesia and other interventions. However, further studies are required to validate this hypothesis. Key Points Summary: Question: How can the ultrasound pleural signal be distinguished from other tissues during breathing?

The frequency domain analysis of the pleural ultrasound signal showed fast variant and multi-band characteristics. We suggest this is due to ultrasound distortion caused by the interface of multiple moving alveoli. The multiple ultrasonic reflections from the sliding pleura and alveoli returned in variable and multi-banded frequency. Meaning: The distinguished pleural signal can be used for the auto-identification of the pleura for further clinical respiration monitoring and safety during regional anesthesia. Glossary of Terms: intra-needle ultrasound (INUS); radio frequency (RF); short-time Fourier transform (STFT); intercostal nerve block (ICNB); paravertebral block (PVB); pulse repetition frequency (PRF).

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in obstetric anaesthesiology shows great potential in enhancing our practice and delivery of care. In this narrative review, we summarise the current applications of AI in four key areas of obstetric anaesthesiology (perioperative care, neuraxial procedures, labour analgesia and obstetric critical care), where AI has been employed to varying degrees for decision support, event prediction, risk stratification and procedural assistance. We also identify gaps in current practice and propose areas for further research. While promising, AI cannot replace the expertise and clinical judgement of a trained obstetric anaesthesiologist. It should, instead, be viewed as a valuable tool to facilitate and support our practice.

With an increase in geriatric population undergoing surgical procedures, research focused on enhancing their perioperative outcomes is of paramount importance. Currently, most of the evidence-based medicine protocols are driven by studies concentrating on adults encompassing all adult age groups. Given the alterations in physiology with aging, geriatric patients respond differently to anesthetics and, therefore, require specific research initiatives to further expound on the same. Large databases and the development of sophisticated analytic tools can provide meaningful insights into this. Here, we discuss a few research opportunities and challenges that data scientists face when focusing on geriatric perioperative research.

Successful implementation of machine learning-augmented clinical decision support systems (ML-CDSS) in perioperative care requires the prioritization of patient-centric approaches to ensure alignment with societal expectations. We assessed general public and surgical patient attitudes and perspectives on ML-CDSS use in perioperative care.

A sequential explanatory study was conducted. Stage 1 collected public opinions through a survey. Stage 2 ascertained surgical patients' experiences and attitudes via focus groups and interviews.

For Stage 1, a total of 281 respondents' (140 males [49.8%]) data were considered. Among participants without ML awareness, males were almost three times more likely than females to report more acceptance (OR = 2.97; 95% CI, 1.36-6.49) and embrace (OR = 2.74; 95% CI, 1.23-6.09) of ML-CDSS use by perioperative teams. Males were almost twice as likely as females to report more acceptance across all perioperative phases with ORs ranging from 1.71 to 2.07. In Stage 2, insights from 10 surgical patients revealed unanimous agreement that ML-CDSS should primarily serve a supportive function. The pre- and post-operative phases were identified explicitly as forums where ML-CDSS can enhance care delivery. Patients requested for education on ML-CDSS's role in their care to be disseminated by surgeons across multiple platforms.

The general public and surgical patients are receptive to ML-CDSS use throughout their perioperative care provided its role is auxiliary to perioperative teams. However, the integration of ML-CDSS into perioperative workflows presents unique challenges for healthcare settings. Insights from this study can inform strategies to support large-scale implementation and adoption of ML-CDSS by patients in all perioperative phases. Key strategies to promote the feasibility and acceptability of ML-CDSS include clinician-led discussions about ML-CDSS's role in perioperative care, established metrics to evaluate the clinical utility of ML-CDSS, and patient education.

The application of artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesiology has become increasingly widespread. However, no previous study has analyzed this field from the bibliometric analysis dimension. The objective of this paper was to assess the global research trends in AI in anesthesiology using bibliometric software. Literatures relevant to AI and anesthesiology were retrieved from the Web of Science until 10 April 2024 and were visualized and analyzed using Excel, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer. After screening, 491 studies were included in the final bibliometric analysis. The growth rate of publications, countries, institutions, authors, journals, literature co-citations, and keyword co-occurrences was computed. The number of publications increased annually since 2018, with the most significant contributions from the USA, China, and England. The top 3 institutions were Yuan Ze University, National Taiwan University, and Brunel University London. The top three journals were Anesthesia & Analgesia, BMC Anesthesiology, and the British Journal of Anaesthesia. The researches on the application of AI in predicting hypotension have been extensive and represented a hotspot and frontier. In terms of keyword co-occurrence cluster analysis, keywords were categorized into four clusters: ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia, postoperative pain and airway management, prediction, depth of anesthesia (DoA), and intraoperative drug infusion. This analysis provides a systematic analysis on the literature regarding the AI-related research in the field of anesthesiology, which may help researchers and anesthesiologists better understand the research trend of anesthesia-related AI.

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is vital for practitioners to incorporate AI and robotics in day-to-day regional anesthesia practice. Recent literature is encouraging on its applications in regional anesthesia, but the data are limited. AI can help us identify and guide the needle tip precisely to the location. This may help us reduce the time, improve precision, and reduce the associated side effects of improper distribution of drugs. In this article, we discuss the potential roles of AI and robotics in regional anesthesia.

Loss of resistance (LOR) is a widely accepted method for performing epidural punctures in clinical settings. However, the risk of failure associated with LOR is still high. Solutions based either on Fiber Bragg grating sensors (FBG) or on artificial intelligence (AI) are gaining ground for supporting clinicians during this kind of procedure. Here, for the first time, we combined the mentioned two technologies to perform an AI-driven LOR identification based on data collected by a custom FBG sensor.

This study presented two contributions (i.e., automatic labeling and identification) based on machine learning to support epidural procedures by enhancing LOR detection. The methods were tested using data collected by a customized FBG-based flexible cap on 10 patients affected by chronic back pain.

The automatic labeling can retrospectively identify every LOR event for each subject under consideration. This serves as the labeling for the automatic identification task, which emulates the real-time application of LOR detection. A Support Vector Machine, trained using a Leave-One-Out strategy, demonstrates high accuracy in identifying all LOR events while maintaining a minimal rate of false positives.

Our findings revealed the promising performance of the proposed AI-based approach for automatic LOR detection. Thus, their combination with FBG technology can potentially improve the level of support offered to clinicians in this application.

The integration of AI and FBG technologies holds the promise of revolutionizing LOR detection, reducing the likelihood of unsuccessful epidural punctures and advancing pain management.

Peripheral nerve blocking (PNB) via ultrasound (US) imaging offers the advantages of non-invasiveness, nonionizing radiation, and real-time visualization. However, the high cost of 3D US makes the clinicians to imagine the anatomical volume from 2D sections. Consequently, there is a need to develop a tool capable of predicting the trajectory of a US probe and reconstructing a 3D volume. This paper presents a kernel-based deep learning enhancement for estimating the freehand trajectory of an US probe from 2D US images. Specifically, we employ a random Fourier features (RFF)-based approach to enhance the generalization capability of existing models for 2D US probe localization. Training of the architecture with the proposed layer considers a public dataset of two anatomical phantoms. A cross-validation scheme validates the robustness using predictions from various training data splits. The results demonstrate that the RFF layer outperforms the baseline models in probe localization.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a speciality within computer science that deals with creating systems that can replicate the intelligence of a human mind and has problem-solving abilities. AI includes a diverse array of techniques and approaches such as machine learning, neural networks, natural language processing, robotics, and expert systems. An electronic literature search was conducted using the databases of "PubMed" and "Google Scholar". The period for the search was from 2000 to June 2023. The search terms included "artificial intelligence", "machine learning", "liver cancers", "liver tumors", "hepatectomy", "perioperative" and their synonyms in various combinations. The search also included all MeSH terms. The extracted articles were further reviewed in a step-wise manner for identification of relevant studies. A total of 148 articles were identified after the initial literature search. Initial review included screening of article titles for relevance and identifying duplicates. Finally, 65 articles were reviewed for this review article. The future of AI in liver cancer planning and management holds immense promise. AI-driven advancements will increasingly enable precise tumour detection, location, and characterisation through enhanced image analysis. ML algorithms will predict patient-specific treatment responses and complications, allowing for tailored therapies. Surgical robots and AI-guided procedures will enhance the precision of liver resections, reducing risks and improving outcomes. AI will also streamline patient monitoring, better hemodynamic management, enabling early detection of recurrence or complications. Moreover, AI will facilitate data-driven research, accelerating the development of novel treatments and therapies. Ultimately, AI's integration will revolutionise liver cancer care, offering personalised, efficient and effective solutions, improving patients' quality of life and survival rates.

Artificial intelligence (AI) for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia is a rapidly developing interdisciplinary field. There is a risk that work could be undertaken in parallel by different elements of the community but with a lack of knowledge transfer between disciplines, leading to repetition and diverging methodologies. This scoping review aimed to identify and map the available literature on the accuracy and utility of AI systems for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia.

A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library. Clinical trial registries, a registry of doctoral theses, regulatory authority databases, and websites of learned societies in the field were searched. Online commercial sources were also reviewed.

In total, 13,014 sources were identified; 116 were included for full-text review. A marked change in AI techniques was noted in 2016-17, from which point on the predominant technique used was deep learning. Methods of evaluating accuracy are variable, meaning it is impossible to compare the performance of one model with another. Evaluations of utility are more comparable, but predominantly gained from the simulation setting with limited clinical data on efficacy or safety. Study methodology and reporting lack standardisation.

There is a lack of structure to the evaluation of accuracy and utility of AI for ultrasound scanning in regional anaesthesia, which hinders rigorous appraisal and clinical uptake. A framework for consistent evaluation is needed to inform model evaluation, allow comparison between approaches/models, and facilitate appropriate clinical adoption.

Application of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine is quickly expanding. Despite the amount of evidence and promising results, a thorough overview of the current state of AI in clinical practice of anesthesiology is needed. Therefore, our study aims to systematically review the application of AI in this context.

A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Medline and Web of Science for articles published up to November 2022 using terms related with AI and clinical practice of anesthesiology. Articles that involved animals, editorials, reviews and sample size lower than 10 patients were excluded. Characteristics and accuracy measures from each study were extracted.

A total of 46 articles were included in this review. We have grouped them into 4 categories with regard to their clinical applicability: (1) Depth of Anesthesia Monitoring; (2) Image-guided techniques related to Anesthesia; (3) Prediction of events/risks related to Anesthesia; (4) Drug administration control. Each group was analyzed, and the main findings were summarized. Across all fields, the majority of AI methods tested showed superior performance results compared to traditional methods.

AI systems are being integrated into anesthesiology clinical practice, enhancing medical professionals' skills of decision-making, diagnostic accuracy, and therapeutic response.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is making giant strides in the medical domain, and the field of anaesthesia is not untouched. Enhancement in technology, especially AI, in many fields, including medicine, has proven to be far superior, safer and less erratic than human decision-making. The intersection of anaesthesia and AI holds the potential for augmenting constructive advances in anaesthesia care. AI can improve anaesthesiologists' efficiency, reduce costs and improve patient outcomes. Anaesthesiologists are well placed to harness the advantages of AI in various areas like perioperative monitoring, anaesthesia care, drug delivery, post-anaesthesia care unit, pain management and intensive care unit. Perioperative monitoring of the depth of anaesthesia, clinical decision support systems and closed-loop anaesthesia delivery aid in efficient and safer anaesthesia delivery. The effect of various AI interventions in clinical practice will need further research and validation, as well as the ethical implications of privacy and data handling. This paper aims to provide an overview of AI in perioperative monitoring in anaesthesia.

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a common method of inducing perioperative analgesia in thoracic and abdominal surgery. Identifying anatomical structures in ultrasound images is very important especially for inexperienced anesthesiologists who are unfamiliar with the anatomy. Therefore, our aim was to develop an artificial neural network (ANN) to automatically identify (in real-time) anatomical structures in ultrasound images of TPVB. This study is a retrospective study using ultrasound scans (both video and standard still images) that we acquired. We marked the contours of the paravertebral space (PVS), lung, and bone in the TPVB ultrasound image. Based on the labeled ultrasound images, we used the U-net framework to train and create an ANN that enabled real-time identification of important anatomical structures in ultrasound images. A total of 742 ultrasound images were acquired and labeled in this study. In this ANN, the Intersection over Union (IoU) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC or Dice coefficient) of the paravertebral space (PVS) were 0.75 and 0.86, respectively, the IoU and DSC of the lung were 0.85 and 0.92, respectively, and the IoU and DSC of the bone were 0.69 and 0.83, respectively. The accuracies of the PVS, lung, and bone were 91.7%, 95.4%, and 74.3%, respectively. For tenfold cross validation, the median interquartile range for PVS IoU and DSC was 0.773 and 0.87, respectively. There was no significant difference in the scores for the PVS, lung, and bone between the two anesthesiologists. We developed an ANN for the real-time automatic identification of thoracic paravertebral anatomy. The performance of the ANN was highly satisfactory. We conclude that AI has good prospects for use in TPVB. Clinical registration number: ChiCTR2200058470 (URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=152839 ; registration date: 2022-04-09).

Machine vision describes the use of artificial intelligence to interpret, analyze, and derive predictions from image or video data. Machine vision-based techniques are already in clinical use in radiology, ophthalmology, and dermatology, where some applications currently equal or exceed the performance of specialty physicians in areas of image interpretation. While machine vision in anesthesia has many potential applications, its development remains in its infancy in our specialty. Early research for machine vision in anesthesia has focused on automated recognition of anatomical structures during ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia or line insertion; recognition of the glottic opening and vocal cords during video laryngoscopy; prediction of the difficult airway using facial images; and clinical alerts for endobronchial intubation detected on chest radiograph. Current machine vision applications measuring the distance between endotracheal tube tip and carina have demonstrated noninferior performance compared to board-certified physicians. The performance and potential uses of machine vision for anesthesia will only grow with the advancement of underlying machine vision algorithm technical performance developed outside of medicine, such as convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. This article summarizes recently published works of interest, provides a brief overview of techniques used to create machine vision applications, explains frequently used terms, and discusses challenges the specialty will encounter as we embrace the advantages that this technology may bring to future clinical practice and patient care. As machine vision emerges onto the clinical stage, it is critically important that anesthesiologists are prepared to confidently assess which of these devices are safe, appropriate, and bring added value to patient care.

With an increase in geriatric population undergoing surgical procedures, research focused on enhancing their perioperative outcomes is of paramount importance. Currently, most of the evidence-based medicine protocols are driven by studies concentrating on adults encompassing all adult age groups. Given the alterations in physiology with aging, geriatric patients respond differently to anesthetics and, therefore, require specific research initiatives to further expound on the same. Large databases and the development of sophisticated analytic tools can provide meaningful insights into this. Here, we discuss a few research opportunities and challenges that data scientists face when focusing on geriatric perioperative research.

Needle positioning is essential for various medical applications such as epidural anaesthesia. Physicians rely on their instincts while navigating the needle in epidural spaces. Thereby, identifying the tissue structures may be helpful to the physician as they can provide additional feedback in the needle insertion process. To this end, we propose a deep neural network that classifies the tissues from the phase and intensity data of complex OCT signals acquired at the needle tip. We investigate the performance of the deep neural network in a limited labelled dataset scenario and propose a novel contrastive pretraining strategy that learns invariant representation for phase and intensity data. We show that with 10% of the training set, our proposed pretraining strategy helps the model achieve an F1 score of 0.84±0.10 whereas the model achieves an F1 score of 0.60±0.07 without it. Further, we analyse the importance of phase and intensity individually towards tissue classification.

Regional anesthesia is increasingly used in acute postoperative pain management. Ultrasound has been used to facilitate the performance of the regional block, increase the percentage of successfully performed procedures and reduce the complication rate. Artificial intelligence (AI) has been studied in many medical disciplines with achieving high success, especially in radiology. The purpose of this review was to review the evidence on the application of artificial intelligence for optimization and interpretation of the sonographic image, and visualization of needle advancement and injection of local anesthetic.

To conduct this scoping review, we followed the PRISMA-S guidelines. We included studies if they met the following criteria: (1) Application of Artificial intelligence-assisted in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia; (2) Any human subject (of any age), object (manikin), or animal; (3) Study design: prospective, retrospective, RCTs; (4) Any method of regional anesthesia (epidural, spinal anesthesia, peripheral nerves); (5) Any anatomical localization of regional anesthesia (any nerve or plexus) (6) Any methods of artificial intelligence; (7) Settings: Any healthcare settings (Medical centers, hospitals, clinics, laboratories.

The systematic searches identified 78 citations. After the removal of the duplicates, 19 full-text articles were assessed; and 15 studies were eligible for inclusion in the review.

AI solutions might be useful in anatomical landmark identification, reducing or even avoiding possible complications. AI-guided solutions can improve the optimization and interpretation of the sonographic image, visualization of needle advancement, and injection of local anesthetic. AI-guided solutions might improve the training process in UGRA. Although significant progress has been made in the application of AI-guided UGRA, randomized control trials are still missing.

Narrative review.

This review aims to present current applications of machine learning (ML) in spine domain to clinicians.

We conducted a comprehensive PubMed search of peer-reviewed articles that were published between 2006 and 2020 using terms (spine, spinal, lumbar, cervical, thoracic, machine learning) to examine ML in spine. Then exclude research of other domain, case report, review or meta-analysis, and which without available abstract or full text.

Total 1738 articles were retrieved from database, and 292 studies were finally included. Key findings of current applications were compiled and summarized in this review. Main clinical applications of those techniques including image processing, diagnosis, decision supporting, operative assistance, rehabilitation, surgery outcomes, complications, hospitalization and cost.

ML had achieved excellent performance and hold immense potential in spine. ML could help clinical staff to improve medical level, enhance work efficiency, and reduce adverse events. However more randomized controlled trials and improvement of interpretability are essential to clinicians accepting models' assistance in real work.

As the spine is pivotal in the support and protection of human bodies, much attention is given to the understanding of spinal diseases. Quick, accurate, and automatic analysis of a spine image greatly enhances the efficiency with which spine conditions can be diagnosed. Deep learning (DL) is a representative artificial intelligence technology that has made encouraging progress in the last 6 years. However, it is still difficult for clinicians and technicians to fully understand this rapidly evolving field due to the diversity of applications, network structures, and evaluation criteria. This study aimed to provide clinicians and technicians with a comprehensive understanding of the development and prospects of DL spine image analysis by reviewing published literature.

A systematic literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases using the keywords "deep learning" and "spine". Date ranges used to conduct the search were from 1 January, 2015 to 20 March, 2021. A total of 79 English articles were reviewed.

The DL technology has been applied extensively to the segmentation, detection, diagnosis, and quantitative evaluation of spine images. It uses static or dynamic image information, as well as local or non-local information. The high accuracy of analysis is comparable to that achieved manually by doctors. However, further exploration is needed in terms of data sharing, functional information, and network interpretability.

The DL technique is a powerful method for spine image analysis. We believe that, with the joint efforts of researchers and clinicians, intelligent, interpretable, and reliable DL spine analysis methods will be widely applied in clinical practice in the future.

Peripheral nerve blocking (PNB) is a standard procedure to support regional anesthesia. Still, correct localization of the nerve's structure is needed to avoid adverse effects; thereby, ultrasound images are used as an aid approach. In addition, image-based automatic nerve segmentation from deep learning methods has been proposed to mitigate attenuation and speckle noise ultrasonography issues. Notwithstanding, complex architectures highlight the region of interest lacking suitable data interpretability concerning the learned features from raw instances. Here, a kernel-based deep learning enhancement is introduced for nerve structure segmentation. In a nutshell, a random Fourier features-based approach was utilized to complement three well-known semantic segmentation architectures, e.g., fully convolutional network, U-net, and ResUnet. Moreover, two ultrasound image datasets for PNB were tested. Obtained results show that our kernel-based approach provides a better generalization capability from image segmentation-based assessments on different nerve structures. Further, for data interpretability, a semantic segmentation extension of the GradCam++ for class-activation mapping was used to reveal relevant learned features separating between nerve and background. Thus, our proposal favors both straightforward (shallow) and complex architectures (deeper neural networks).

With the tremendous volume of data captured during surgeries and procedures, critical care, and pain management, the field of anesthesiology is uniquely suited for the application of machine learning, neural networks, and closed loop technologies. In the past several years, this area has expanded immensely in both interest and clinical applications. This article provides an overview of the basic tenets of machine learning, neural networks, and closed loop devices, with emphasis on the clinical applications of these technologies.

During the last two decades, intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) imaging has been employed for various surgical procedures of the spine, including spinal fusion and needle injections. Accurate and efficient registration of pre-operative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images with iUS images are key elements in the success of iUS-based spine navigation. While widely investigated in research, iUS-based spine navigation has not yet been established in the clinic. This is due to several factors including the lack of a standard methodology for the assessment of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability of the registration method. To address these issues, we present a systematic review of the state-of-the-art techniques for iUS-guided registration in spinal image-guided surgery (IGS). The review follows a new taxonomy based on the four steps involved in the surgical workflow that include pre-processing, registration initialization, estimation of the required patient to image transformation, and a visualization process. We provide a detailed analysis of the measurements in terms of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability that need to be met during the evaluation of a spinal IGS framework. Although this review is focused on spinal navigation, we expect similar evaluation criteria to be relevant for other IGS applications.

Artificial intelligence has been advancing in fields including anesthesiology. This scoping review of the intersection of artificial intelligence and anesthesia research identified and summarized six themes of applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: (1) depth of anesthesia monitoring, (2) control of anesthesia, (3) event and risk prediction, (4) ultrasound guidance, (5) pain management, and (6) operating room logistics. Based on papers identified in the review, several topics within artificial intelligence were described and summarized: (1) machine learning (including supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning), (2) techniques in artificial intelligence (e.g., classical machine learning, neural networks and deep learning, Bayesian methods), and (3) major applied fields in artificial intelligence.The implications of artificial intelligence for the practicing anesthesiologist are discussed as are its limitations and the role of clinicians in further developing artificial intelligence for use in clinical care. Artificial intelligence has the potential to impact the practice of anesthesiology in aspects ranging from perioperative support to critical care delivery to outpatient pain management.

Data-driven computational approaches have evolved to enable extraction of information from medical images with a reliability, accuracy and speed which is already transforming their interpretation and exploitation in clinical practice. While similar benefits are longed for in the field of interventional imaging, this ambition is challenged by a much higher heterogeneity. Clinical workflows within interventional suites and operating theatres are extremely complex and typically rely on poorly integrated intra-operative devices, sensors, and support infrastructures. Taking stock of some of the most exciting developments in machine learning and artificial intelligence for computer assisted interventions, we highlight the crucial need to take context and human factors into account in order to address these challenges. Contextual artificial intelligence for computer assisted intervention, or CAI4CAI, arises as an emerging opportunity feeding into the broader field of surgical data science. Central challenges being addressed in CAI4CAI include how to integrate the ensemble of prior knowledge and instantaneous sensory information from experts, sensors and actuators; how to create and communicate a faithful and actionable shared representation of the surgery among a mixed human-AI actor team; how to design interventional systems and associated cognitive shared control schemes for online uncertainty-aware collaborative decision making ultimately producing more precise and reliable interventions.

We conducted a systematic review of literature to better understand the role of new technologies in the perioperative period; in particular we focus on the administrative and managerial Operating Room (OR) perspective. Studies conducted on adult (≥ 18 years) patients between 2015 and February 2019 were deemed eligible. A total of 19 papers were included. Our review suggests that the use of Machine Learning (ML) in the field of OR organization has many potentials. Predictions of the surgical case duration were obtain with a good performance; their use could therefore allow a more precise scheduling, limiting waste of resources. ML is able to support even more complex models, which can coordinate multiple spaces simultaneously, as in the case of the post-anesthesia care unit and operating rooms. Types of Artificial Intelligence could also be used to limit another organizational problem, which has important economic repercussions: cancellation. Random Forest has proven effective in identifing surgeries with high risks of cancellation, allowing to plan preventive measures to reduce the cancellation rate accordingly. In conclusion, although data in literature are still limited, we believe that ML has great potential in the field of OR organization; however, further studies are needed to assess the effective role of these new technologies in the perioperative medicine.

3D reconstruction of a targeted area ("safe" triangle and Kambin triangle) may benefit the viability assessment of transforaminal epidural steroid injection, especially at the L5/S1 level. However, manual segmentation of lumbosacral nerves for 3D reconstruction is time-consuming. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of deep learning-based segmentation of lumbosacral nerves on CT and the reconstruction of the safe triangle and Kambin triangle.

A total of 50 cases of spinal CT were manually labeled for lumbosacral nerves and bones using Slicer 4.8. The ratio of training/validation/testing was 32:8:10. A 3D U-Net was adopted to build the model SPINECT for automatic segmentations of lumbosacral structures. The Dice score, pixel accuracy, and Intersection over Union were computed to assess the segmentation performance of SPINECT. The areas of Kambin and safe triangles were measured to validate the 3D reconstruction.

The results revealed successful segmentation of lumbosacral bone and nerve on CT. The average pixel accuracy for bone was 0.940, and for nerve, 0.918. The average Intersection over Union for bone was 0.897 and for nerve, 0.827. The Dice score for bone was 0.945, and for nerve, it was 0.905. There were no significant differences in the quantified Kambin triangle or safe triangle between manually segmented images and automatically segmented images (P > .05).

Deep learning-based automatic segmentation of lumbosacral structures (nerves and bone) on routine CT is feasible, and SPINECT-based 3D reconstruction of safe and Kambin triangles is also validated.