1
|
Maselli R, de Sire R, Fugazza A, Spadaccini M, Colombo M, Capogreco A, Beyna T, Repici A. Updates on the Management of Ampullary Neoplastic Lesions. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3138. [PMID: 37835881 PMCID: PMC10572979 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13193138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Ampullary neoplastic lesions (ANLs) represent a rare cancer, accounting for about 0.6-0.8% of all gastrointestinal malignancies, and about 6-17% of periampullary tumors. They can be sporadic or occur in the setting of a hereditary predisposition syndrome, mainly familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Usually, noninvasive ANLs are asymptomatic and detected accidentally during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). When symptomatic, ANLs can manifest differently with jaundice, pain, pancreatitis, cholangitis, and melaena. Endoscopy with a side-viewing duodenoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) play a crucial role in the ANL evaluation, providing an accurate assessment of the size, location, and characteristics of the lesions, including the staging of the depth of tumor invasion into the surrounding tissues and the involvement of local lymph nodes. Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has been recognized as an effective treatment for ANLs in selected patients, providing an alternative to traditional surgical methods. Originally, EP was recommended for benign lesions and patients unfit for surgery. However, advancements in endoscopic techniques have broadened its indications to comprise early ampullary carcinoma, giant laterally spreading lesions, and ANLs with intraductal extension. In this paper, we review the existing evidence on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of ampullary neoplastic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maselli
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Roberto de Sire
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University Federico II of Naples, 80126 Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Matteo Colombo
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Antonio Capogreco
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of General Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus, 40217 Düsseldorf, Germany;
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (R.M.); (A.F.); (M.S.); (M.C.); (A.C.); (A.R.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Most ampullary lesions (ALs) are sporadic, involve the major papilla, and are premalignant (adenomas). They are often diagnosed as an incidental finding during endoscopy or imaging procedures. Diagnosis and staging of ALs include endoscopic, histologic, and radiological evaluations. Currently, endoscopic papillectomy is the preferred treatment for ALs in most situations. In this article, we will describe the diagnostic work-up and focus on the endoscopic treatment, including indications, technique, outcomes, complications, and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Teles de Campos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Avenida de Brasília, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - Marco J Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam 3015 GD, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vanbiervliet G, Strijker M, Arvanitakis M, Aelvoet A, Arnelo U, Beyna T, Busch O, Deprez PH, Kunovsky L, Larghi A, Manes G, Moss A, Napoleon B, Nayar M, Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Seewald S, Barthet M, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:429-448. [PMID: 33728632 DOI: 10.1055/a-1397-3198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends against diagnostic/therapeutic papillectomy when adenoma is not proven.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2: ESGE recommends endoscopic ultrasound and abdominal magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for staging of ampullary tumors.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3: ESGE recommends endoscopic papillectomy in patients with ampullary adenoma without intraductal extension, because of good results regarding outcome (technical and clinical success, morbidity, and recurrence).Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4: ESGE recommends en bloc resection of ampullary adenomas up to 20-30 mm in diameter to achieve R0 resection, for optimizing the complete resection rate, providing optimal histopathology, and reduction of the recurrence rate after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 5: ESGE suggests considering surgical treatment of ampullary adenomas when endoscopic resection is not feasible for technical reasons (e. g. diverticulum, size > 4 cm), and in the case of intraductal involvement (of > 20 mm). Surveillance thereafter is still mandatory.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6: ESGE recommends direct snare resection without submucosal injection for endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 7: ESGE recommends prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting to reduce the risk of pancreatitis after endoscopic papillectomy.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 8: ESGE recommends long-term monitoring of patients after endoscopic papillectomy or surgical ampullectomy, based on duodenoscopy with biopsies of the scar and of any abnormal area, within the first 3 months, at 6 and 12 months, and thereafter yearly for at least 5 years.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffroy Vanbiervliet
- Department of Digestive Endoscopy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France
| | - Marin Strijker
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arthur Aelvoet
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Urban Arnelo
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Dusseldorf, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
| | - Olivier Busch
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Department, Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lumir Kunovsky
- Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Brno, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Alberto Larghi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianpiero Manes
- Aziende Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Rhodense, Gastroenterology, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Medicine, Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bertrand Napoleon
- Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Lyon, France
| | - Manu Nayar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Enrique Pérez-Cuadrado-Robles
- Department of Gastroenterology, Georges-Pompidou European Hospital, AP-HP Centre - Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Stefan Seewald
- Gastroenterology Center, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Barthet
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hôpital Nord, Assistance publique des hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jiang L, Ling-Hu EQ, Chai NL, Li W, Cai FC, Li MY, Guo X, Meng JY, Wang XD, Tang P, Zhu J, Du H, Wang HB. Novel endoscopic papillectomy for reducing postoperative adverse events (with videos). World J Gastroenterol 2020; 26:6250-6259. [PMID: 33177797 PMCID: PMC7596639 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i40.6250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic adenoma can potentially transform into adenocarcinoma, so it is recommended to be resected surgically or endoscopically. Endoscopic papillectomy is one of the main treatments for papillary adenoma, and bleeding, perforation, and pancreatitis are the most frequent and critical adverse events that restrict its wider use. There is no standard procedure for endoscopic papillectomy yet. The procedure is relevant to postoperative adverse events.
AIM To reduce the postoperative adverse event rates and improve patients’ postoperative condition, we developed a standard novel procedure for endoscopic papillectomy.
METHODS The novel endoscopic papillectomy had two main modifications based on the conventional method: The isolation of bile from pancreatic juice with a bile duct stent and wound surface protection with metal clips and fibrin glue. We performed a single-center retrospective comparison study on the novel and conventional methods to examine the feasibility of the novel method for reducing postoperative adverse events.
RESULTS A total of 76 patients, of whom 23 underwent the novel procedure and 53 underwent the conventional procedure, were retrospectively evaluated in this study. The postoperative bleeding and pancreatitis rates of the novel method were significantly lower than those of the conventional method (0 vs 20.75%, P = 0.028, and 17.4% vs 41.5%, P = 0.042, respectively). After applying the novel method, the most critical adverse event, perforation, was entirely prevented, compared to a prevalence of 5.66% with the conventional method. Several postoperative symptoms, including fever, rapid pulse, and decrease in hemoglobin level, were significantly less frequent in the novel group (P = 0.042, 0.049, and 0.014, respectively). Overall, the total adverse event rate of the novel method was lower (0 vs 24.5%, P = 0.007) than that of the conventional method.
CONCLUSION Patients who underwent the novel procedure had lower postoperative adverse event rates. This study demonstrates the potential efficacy and safety of the novel endoscopic papillectomy in reducing postoperative adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Jiang
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
| | - En-Qiang Ling-Hu
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ning-Li Chai
- School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Wen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Feng-Chun Cai
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ming-Yang Li
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xu Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jiang-Yun Meng
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Xiang-Dong Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Ping Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Jing Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Hong Du
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Hong-Bin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) has been established as a useful endoscopic therapy by the efforts of many pancreatobiliary endoscopists and is presently accepted as a reliable alternative therapy to surgery in patients with ampullary adenoma. Moreover, there have been numerous advancements in EP techniques in recent years. Various approaches and attempts toward expanding the indications of endoscopic resection have been reported. Furthermore, the management and prevention of adverse events (AEs) and endoscopic treatment for remnant or recurrent lesions have also been reported. In the present review, we focus on recent advancements in the EP technique, as well as speculate on the future issues of EP. AREA COVERED This review of EP encompasses the indications, preoperative assessments, endoscopic techniques, outcomes, and AEs of EP, post-EP surveillance techniques, and treatments for remnant or recurrence lesions. EXPERT OPINION The ultimate goal of EP is the complete resection of ampullary tumors, regardless of whether they are adenomatous or carcinomatous lesions, without causing any AEs. Therefore, the most important issue is preoperative evaluation, that is, the accurate diagnosis of lesions contraindicated for EP. In addition, further research on the prevention of AEs is also necessary towards establishing EP as a safe endoscopic procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenjiro Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eisuke Iwasaki
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University , Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Espinel J, Pinedo E, Ojeda V, Rio MGD. Endoscopic management of adenomatous ampullary lesions. World J Methodol 2015; 5:127-135. [PMID: 26413485 PMCID: PMC4572025 DOI: 10.5662/wjm.v5.i3.127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2015] [Revised: 03/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/19/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Lesions of the ampulla of Vater represent an uncommon group of gastrointestinal malignancies. The majority of lesions of the ampulla of Vater are either adenomas or adenocarcinomas. Ampullary lesions are often incidental findings. Accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging of ampullary tumors is imperative for predicting prognosis and determining the most appropriate therapeutic approach. Endoscopic ampullectomy is a safe and efficacious therapeutic procedure that can obviate the need for potentially major surgical intervention. This review will provide the framework for the diagnosis and management of ampullary lesions from the perspective of the practicing gastroenterologist. Strategies for safe and successful endoscopic ampullectomy with a focus on accurate preoperative diagnosis and staging, resection technique, and management of complications are presented.
Collapse
|
7
|
Ardengh JC, Kemp R, Lima-Filho &ER, Santos JSD. Endoscopic papillectomy: The limits of the indication, technique and results. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:987-994. [PMID: 26265992 PMCID: PMC4530332 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2014] [Revised: 12/31/2014] [Accepted: 07/17/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
In the majority of cases, duodenal papillary tumors are adenomas or adenocarcinomas, but the endoscopy biopsy shows low accuracy to make the correct differentiation. Endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are important tools for the diagnosis, staging and management of ampullary lesions. Although the endoscopic papillectomy (EP) represent higher risk endoscopic interventions, it has successfully replaced surgical treatment for benign or malignant papillary tumors. The authors review the epidemiology and discuss the current evidence for the use of endoscopic procedures for resection, the selection of the patient and the preventive maneuvers that can minimize the probability of persistent or recurrent lesions and to avoid complications after the procedure. The accurate staging of ampullary tumors is important for selecting patients to EP or surgical treatment. Compared to surgery, EP is associated with lower morbidity and mortality, and seems to be a preferable modality of treatment for small benign ampullary tumors with no intraductal extension. The EP procedure, when performed by an experienced endoscopist, leads to successful eradication in up to 85% of patients with ampullary adenomas. EP is a safe and effective therapy and should be established as the first-line therapy for ampullary adenomas.
Collapse
|
8
|
Palma GDD. Endoscopic papillectomy: Indications, techniques, and results. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20:1537-1543. [PMID: 24587629 PMCID: PMC3925862 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i6.1537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2013] [Accepted: 12/13/2013] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic papillectomy (EP) is currently accepted as a viable alternative therapy to surgery in sporadic ampullary adenoma and has been reported to have high success and low recurrence rates. At present, the indications for EP are not yet fully established. The accepted criteria for EP include size (up to 5 cm), no evidence of intraductal growth, and no evidence of malignancy on endoscopic findings (ulceration, friability, and spontaneous bleeding). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is the imaging modality of choice for local T staging in ampullary neoplasms. Data reported in the literature have revealed that linear EUS is superior to helical computed tomography in the preoperative assessment of tumor size, detection of regional nodal metastases and detection of major vascular invasion. Endoscopic ampullectomy is performed using a standard duodenoscope in a similar manner to snare polypectomy of a mucosal lesion. There is no standardization of the equipment or technique and broad EP methods are described. Endoscopic ampullectomy is considered a ‘‘high-risk’’ procedure due to complications. Complications of endoscopic papillectomy can be classified as early (pancreatitis, bleeding, perforation, and cholangitis) and late (papillary stenosis) complications. The appropriate use of stenting after ampullectomy may prevent post-procedural pancreatitis and papillary stenosis. Tumor recurrence of benign lesions occurs in up to 20% of patients and depends on tumor size, final histology, presence of intraductal tumor, coexisting familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), and the expertise of the endoscopist. Recurrent lesions are usually benign and most can be retreated endoscopically.
Collapse
|
9
|
Kim HK, Lo SK. Endoscopic approach to the patient with benign or malignant ampullary lesions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2013; 23:347-83. [PMID: 23540965 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2013.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Adenoma and adenocarcinoma are the most common ampullary lesions. Advances in diagnostic modalities including endoscopic ultrasonography and intraductal ultrasonography have provided useful information that aids in diagnosing and managing ampullary lesions. Endoscopic papillectomy can be a curative therapy for localized ampullary adenoma and have a role in the diagnosis of indeterminate ampullary lesions that may contain a hidden malignancy. However, the consensus on how and when to use endoscopic papillectomy has not been fully established. This article reviews the approach to the patient with benign or malignant ampullary lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung-Keun Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, Guemo-dong, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
El Hajj II, Coté GA. Endoscopic diagnosis and management of ampullary lesions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2013; 23:95-109. [PMID: 23168121 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2012.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Most (>95%) ampullary lesions are adenomas or adenocarcinomas. Side viewing endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are complementary procedures that have an important role in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of ampullary lesions. Here the authors review their epidemiology and discuss the evidence for endoscopic modalities, with an emphasis on techniques for endoscopic resection. Although endoscopic papillectomy represents one of the highest-risk endoscopic interventions, it has largely replaced surgical modalities for the treatment of adenomatous lesions. Appropriate patient selection and use of preventive maneuvers will minimize the likelihood of persistent or recurrent lesions and postprocedure complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ihab I El Hajj
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
AIM: To investigate the endoscopic ampullectomy practices of expert biliary endoscopists.
METHODS: An anonymous survey was mailed to 79 expert biliary endoscopists to assess ampullectomy practices.
RESULTS: Forty six (58%) biliary endoscopists returned the questionnaire. Of these, 63% were in academia and in practice for an average of 16.4 years (± 8.6). Endoscopists performed an average of 1.1 (± 0.8) ampullectomies per month. Prior to ampullectomy, endoscopic ultrasound was “always” utilized by 67% of respondents vs“sometimes” in 31% of respondents. Empiric biliary sphincterotomy was not utilized uniformly, only 26% “always” and 37% “sometimes” performed it prior to resection. Fifty three percent reported “never” performing empiric pancreatic sphincterotomy prior to ampullectomy. Practitioners with high endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volumes were the most likely to perform a pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR = 10.9; P = 0.09). Participants overwhelmingly favored “always” placing a prophylactic pancreatic stent, with 86% placing it after ampullectomy rather than prior to resection (23%). Argon plasma coagulation was the favored adjunct modality (83%) for removal of residual adenomatous tissue. Practitioners uniformly (100%) preferred follow-up examination to be within 6 mo post-ampullectomy.
CONCLUSION: Among biliary experts, there is less variation in ampullectomy practices than is reflected in the literature.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno De Vega V, Domènech E, Boix J. [Diagnosis and treatment of ampullary tumors]. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2009; 32:101-8. [PMID: 19231683 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2008.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2007] [Accepted: 02/19/2008] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Tumors of the ampulla of Vater are called ampullary tumors and can arise from any of the three epithelia (duodenal, pancreatic and biliary) that delimit the papilla. These tumors are clinically important and early identification, appropriate staging and proper treatment are essential. The symptoms of these tumors are non-specific and not always evident. All ampullary tumors must be resected but opinions differ on the optimal method of excision. Currently, controlled trials are lacking and consequently the treatment chosen must be individually tailored according to the characteristics of the patient and the tumor. Curative treatment may be endoscopic or surgical. In patients who are not candidates for curative treatment, palliative treatment through drainage can be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicente Lorenzo-Zúñiga
- Unidad de Endoscopias, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD).
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Han J, Kim MH. Endoscopic papillectomy for adenomas of the major duodenal papilla (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63:292-301. [PMID: 16427938 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2005] [Accepted: 07/11/2005] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jimin Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | | |
Collapse
|