Published online Mar 25, 2025. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v14.i1.98765
Revised: November 4, 2024
Accepted: November 19, 2024
Published online: March 25, 2025
Processing time: 146 Days and 7.5 Hours
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. It was declared a global pandemic on March 11, 2020, by the World Health Organization. An excessive inflammatory response is a severe respiratory manifestation of COVID-19, which becomes predominant in later stages. Due to its immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory properties, dexamethasone is the first systemic glucocorticoid to treat severe COVID-19 patients. This editorial reviews the efficacy and safety of high-dose vs low-dose dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19. Findings indicate that using low-dose dexamethasone is beneficial and emphasize the need for additional research on the use of high-dose dexamethasone. While the study provides a robust evidence base, it is limited by the lack of long-term data, focus on specific outcomes and heterogeneity of the included studies. Future research should focus on the long-term effects of dexamethasone and its impact across varying disease severities and patient populations to refine treatment strategies and improve patient care.
Core Tip: This editorial evaluates a meta-analysis comparing high-dose and low-dose dexamethasone in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. The study reveals no significant differences in adverse effects and mortality between the dosing regimens. In line with the current guidelines, the study favors using low-dose dexamethasone but highlights the call for additional research on high-dose dexamethasone’s benefits. The study includes limitations such as a lack of long-term data and heterogeneity of the included studies. It is crucial to address these gaps in the future to optimize treatment strategies for COVID-19.
- Citation: Shamim L, Musharaf I, Nashwan AJ. Dexamethasone in coronavirus disease 2019 care: Dosage and utilization insights. World J Virol 2025; 14(1): 98765
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3249/full/v14/i1/98765.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5501/wjv.v14.i1.98765
The disease known as coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)[1]. It is among the most deadly viruses in the history of humans, causing more than 6.8 million deaths globally since its discovery in December 2019[2]. COVID-19 was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization on March 11, 2020[3]. There are multiple stages of COVID-19, and each stage indicates the appropriate course of treatment. Stage 1 is the initial phase of early viral infections, including gastrointestinal or respiratory infections, fever, and lymphopenia. The second stage refers to the pulmonary stage. Multisystemic inflammatory syndrome (MIS) occurs in stage 3, and as a pathogenic characteristic, it is frequently associated with a cytokine storm. There is also the involvement of other mechanisms in the late stage of COVID-19, including neutrophil extracellular traps, edema and vascular leak, bradykinin storm, prothrombotic events, endothelins, and coagulation and complement cascade activation[4]. The clinical picture of COVID-19 shows the dominance of MIS and systemic inflammation over the original viral infection in advanced stages[4].
Systemic corticosteroids are currently recommended by the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 treatment guidelines for COVID-19 patients who require respiratory support[5]. Systemic corticosteroids are the drugs available for treating inflammatory diseases, classified into mineralocorticoids and glucocorticoids. Dexamethasone is the first glucocorticoid to be used in severe COVID-19 patients with clinical benefits[6]. Dexamethasone is an anti-inflammatory and immuno
In contrast, no benefit was shown in patients who did not require respiratory support[9]. We aim to evaluate the role of dexamethasone in the treatment of COVID-19 and various dose regimens and offer evidence-based recommendations for dexamethasone to improve patient care. The meta-analysis conducted by Sethi et al[10] focuses on the safety and efficacy of low-dose vs high-dose dexamethasone by investigating the impact of various dosing regimens of dexamethasone on the outcomes of COVID-19 patients.
Sethi et al[10] conducted a meta-analysis on the dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19. PRISMA guidelines were followed to conduct the systematic review and meta-analyses. Keywords related to corticosteroid dosing and COVID-19 were used to conduct a thorough literature search from databases such as MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed up to March 2024. Only randomized controlled trials were included, including dexamethasone-treated COVID-19 patients. The exclusion criteria included single-arm, non-randomized controlled trials, case reports, observational studies, and non-English articles. Initial screening involved reviewing the abstract and the title, after which the independent reviewers assessed the full text. Data extraction included participant demographics, study specifics, details of intervention, and outcomes. The Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the potential biases and the quality of the study. A narrative synthesis approach was employed with meta-analyses utilizing a random-effect model where necessary. Forest plots were used to quantitatively synthesize and present the adverse events, hospital stay durations, and mortality outcomes.
Nine randomized controlled trials were analyzed in the study to compare the safety and efficacy of low-dose vs high-dose dexamethasone involving 2740 COVID-19 patients. Negligible differences in 28-day and 60-day all-cause mortality were found between the two dosing regimens. There was a slight reduction in average hospital stay when low-dose dexamethasone was administered to patients compared to high-dose dexamethasone administration. The reduction achieved no statistical significance. The rate of occurrence of the adverse effects, including infections, thrombosis, arrhythmias, and myocardial infarction, showed no significant differences and were similar between both groups. The overall findings of the study support the use of low-dose dexamethasone and highlight the need for further research on high-dose dexamethasone and its potential benefits.
Similarly, Snow et al[11] and Kow et al[12] also conducted a meta-analysis and found no significant mortality benefit from high-dose dexamethasone compared to low-dose treatment. However, both studies noted a higher risk of hyperglycemia with a higher dose. This aligns with Sethi et al’s emphasis on the need for further investigation into high-dose dexamethasone, suggesting that its risks might outweigh the benefits without improving clinical outcomes[10].
The article covered a wide range of studies by offering an in-depth analysis. It provides a robust evidence base by synthesizing data from multiple studies and clinical trials. The patient cohort was directly compared by evenly dividing it between low-dose and high-dose treatments. The authors maintained a balanced perspective by considering both the potential risks and the advantages related to dexamethasone therapy.
The lack of long-term data on the dexamethasone usage is one significant limitation. Most of the studies included in the review are short-term, which may not fully reflect dexamethasone’s potential side effects and long-term effects. Studies of varying quality were included in the review, which may impact the overall conclusion. The generalizability of the findings can be limited, and biases can be introduced by differences in methodologies, sample size, and study design. Studies with different patient populations were involved with disease severity of varying degrees. This variation makes it difficult to apply findings consistently to every patient group. The vaccination status of the patients was not discussed, which may influence the effectiveness of dexamethasone.
Moreover, the study focuses on hospitalized COVID-19 patients, which may have overlooked the effects of dexamethasone on less severe or non-hospitalized patients. Hospital stay duration and mortality were mainly assessed in the study, while other potential outcomes, such as functional recovery and quality of life, were not evaluated. Due to the emergence of new studies and treatment guidelines, some of the conclusions and data in the study may become outdated, given the evolving nature of COVID-19. To ensure the study remains accurate and relevant, there is a need for continuous updates to the review.
Low-dose dexamethasone has become the standard treatment for COVID-19 patients requiring oxygen support, showing reduced mortality. It is safer and more effective than higher doses. The risk of adverse events like hyperglycemia may rise with higher dosages, even if they might be just as effective as low doses in lowering mortality. The research by Sethi et al[10] provides valuable insights into the dosage of dexamethasone in COVID-19 patients. The evidence-based and comprehensive approach of the research is commendable. However, limitations such as heterogeneous patient population, rapidly evolving field, variability in study quality, and lack of long-term data must be acknowledged. Future research should address these limitations, assuring that treatment plans can be continuously improved and refined.
1. | Majumder J, Minko T. Recent Developments on Therapeutic and Diagnostic Approaches for COVID-19. AAPS J. 2021;23:14. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 311] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 241] [Article Influence: 80.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, Zhao X, Huang B, Shi W, Lu R, Niu P, Zhan F, Ma X, Wang D, Xu W, Wu G, Gao GF, Tan W; China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727-733. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 18987] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17158] [Article Influence: 4289.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Cucinotta D, Vanelli M. WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:157-160. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2474] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Szekanecz Z, Balog A, Constantin T, Czirják L, Géher P, Kovács L, Kumánovics G, Nagy G, Rákóczi É, Szamosi S, Szűcs G, Vályi-Nagy I. COVID-19: autoimmunity, multisystemic inflammation and autoimmune rheumatic patients. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2022;24:e13. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Treatment Guidelines [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institutes of Health (US); 2021-Apr-21 . [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
6. | Li G, Hilgenfeld R, Whitley R, De Clercq E. Therapeutic strategies for COVID-19: progress and lessons learned. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2023;22:449-475. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 232] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 225] [Article Influence: 225.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Ahmed MH, Hassan A. Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): a Review. SN Compr Clin Med. 2020;2:2637-2646. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 73] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 119] [Article Influence: 29.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Chen F, Hao L, Zhu S, Yang X, Shi W, Zheng K, Wang T, Chen H. Potential Adverse Effects of Dexamethasone Therapy on COVID-19 Patients: Review and Recommendations. Infect Dis Ther. 2021;10:1907-1931. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 12] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 28] [Article Influence: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | RECOVERY Collaborative Group; Horby P, Lim WS, Emberson JR, Mafham M, Bell JL, Linsell L, Staplin N, Brightling C, Ustianowski A, Elmahi E, Prudon B, Green C, Felton T, Chadwick D, Rege K, Fegan C, Chappell LC, Faust SN, Jaki T, Jeffery K, Montgomery A, Rowan K, Juszczak E, Baillie JK, Haynes R, Landray MJ. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:693-704. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6762] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7038] [Article Influence: 2346.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (1)] |
10. | Sethi I, Shaikh A, Sethi M, Chohan HK, Younus S, Khan SA, Surani S. Dosage and utilization of dexamethasone in the management of COVID-19: A critical review. World J Virol. 2024;13:95709. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Snow TAC, Arulkumaran N, Singer M, Choi SH. Effect of dexamethasone dose on outcomes in acute COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Infect. 2023;87:490-497. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Kow CS, Ramachandram DS, Hasan SS. Intermediate- to high-dose dexamethasone versus low-dose dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 requiring respiratory support: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Inflammopharmacology. 2023;31:2773-2779. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |