Published online Mar 25, 2024. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v13.i1.89104
Peer-review started: October 20, 2023
First decision: November 21, 2023
Revised: December 27, 2023
Accepted: January 24, 2024
Article in press: January 24, 2024
Published online: March 25, 2024
Processing time: 143 Days and 1.7 Hours
The issue of reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is often missed due to inadequate evaluation, especially for occult HBV infection (OBI). This reactivation following immunosuppression can lead to liver dysfunction, which in turn either impacts the continuation of therapy and/or increases the morbidity and mortality in an already immunocompromised patient. We attempted to study the same to know the current status of evaluation protocols and the prevalence of HBV infection as well as reactivation.
The protocols for the evaluation of patients with malignancy need to include checking for OBI as it carries risk of reactivation following chemotherapy during treatment. The presence of pre-existing HBV infection always involves a gastroenterology or hepatology consult regarding the consideration of antiviral therapy. On the other hand, OBI is not considered routinely in pretreatment evaluation and therefore any possible prophylaxis is delayed. More data are required in these specific situations to formulate better protocols for the future.
Our primary objective was to determine the prevalence of chronic HBV (CHB) and OBI among oncology and hema
In this observational study, the prevalence of CHB and OBI was assessed among patients receiving chemotherapy. Serological markers of HBV infection [hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)/anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc)/anti-hepatitis B surface antibody] were evaluated for all participants. Those who tested negative for HBsAg but positive for total anti-HBc were tested for HBV DNA levels. Due ethical clearance was taken and data of 400 patients were collected over 2 years. Appropriate statistics were applied for analysis in this observational study.
In our study, the prevalence of CHB within the study cohort was determined to be 2.3% [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.0-4.2]. Additionally, the prevalence of OBI among the study participants was found to be 0.8% (95%CI: 0.2-2.3). Although the prevalence seems low, on consideration of the people affected by malignancy worldwide, the numbers may be significant.
The findings of this study highlight the importance of screening for hepatitis B infection in oncology and hematology-oncology patients undergoing chemotherapy. Identifying individuals with CHB and OBI is crucial for implementing appropriate antiviral prophylaxis to prevent the reactivation of HBV infection, which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality.
The direction of future research should be to actively look for OBI.