Background/Objectives: Anemia is common in critically ill patients, yet red blood cell (RBC) transfusion without active bleeding does not consistently improve outcomes and carries risks such as pulmonary injury, fluid overload, and increased costs. Optimal transfusion thresholds remain debated, with some guidelines recommending a restrictive target of 7 g/dL instead of a more liberal target of 9 g/dL. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines, searching PubMed, EMBASE, and LILACS from January 1995 to October 2024. Thirteen randomized controlled trials involving 13,705 critically ill adults were included, with 6855 assigned to liberal and 6850 to restrictive transfusion strategies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2, and the pooled effect sizes were estimated with a random-effects model. We registered the protocol in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CDR42024589225). Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in 30-day mortality between restrictive and liberal strategies (odds ratio [OR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.25; I2 = 49%). Similarly, no significant differences emerged for the 90-day or 180-day mortality, hospital or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, dialysis requirement, or incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, patients in the restrictive group received significantly fewer RBC units. The trial sequential analysis (TSA) indicated that the evidence accrued was insufficient to definitively confirm or exclude an effect on the 30-day mortality, as the required sample size was not reached. Conclusions: In conclusion, while our meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference in the short-term mortality between restrictive and liberal transfusion strategies, larger trials are needed to fully determine whether any clinically meaningful difference exists in critically ill populations.

BACKGROUND Blood products are an expensive resource. The study aimed to assess the cost spent on red blood cell (RBC) transfusions before and after implementing a 2-factorial RBC transfusion decision protocol and the current cost of an RBC transfusion procedure in the local healthcare system. MATERIAL AND METHODS Six-month periods before and after the implementation of the decision protocol were compared. The cost components considered included RBCs, laboratory tests, labor of healthcare workers involved in the procedure, and management of transfusion reactions. RESULTS Following the implementation of the decision protocol, there was a decrease in transfusion costs by €51,411 (56.4%) in our low transfusion rate setting. Inappropriate RBC transfusions amounted to €25,0146 (62.9% of all transfusions costs). The cost of a leucodepleted RBC transfusion increased in the periods being compared, from approximately €109 to €126 in the local healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS Implementing an RBC transfusion decision protocol based on a 2-factorial approach can lead to a more than 2-fold reduction in cost spent on RBC transfusions in a low transfusion rate setting. Even after the implementation of the protocol, further education of clinicians is required, as there may still be potential to reduce costs associated with inappropriate transfusions. The non-RBC acquisition cost of an RBC transfusion procedure approximates the cost of a blood component itself in the local healthcare system.

The advent of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) unveiled the worst national blood crisis that the United States had witnessed in over a decade. With the pandemic influencing the different stages of the acquisition of blood products outside the hospital setting, we aimed to explore the possible barriers contributing to the shortage of blood products within the medical community.

To assess the adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices for patients in the COVID era and pre-COVID era.

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on hospitalized patients distinguishing the pattern of blood transfusion during the COVID and pre-COVID era in a community hospital. Data was tabulated to include the number of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and if transfusions met restrictive blood transfusion criteria as per institutional guidelines. Chi-square was applied to test the statistical association between qualitative variables. Unpaired t test and Mann Whitney U test were applied respectively to test the mean difference of quantitative variables.

A total of 208 patients were included in the study, of which 108 were during COVID era and 100 were during pre-COVID era. The leading reason for admission in both the COVID era and pre-COVID era transfused patients was shortness of breath (53.7% and 36% P = 0.001), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (25.9% and 21% P = 0.001). There was a higher percentage of RBC transfusions in the intensive care unit in the COVID-era group than in the pre-COVID era group (38.9% vs 22%, P = 0.008). The restrictive transfusion criteria were met in 62% vs 79% in the COVID and pre-COVID eras, respectively (P = 0.008).

The COVID-era group received RBC transfusions with less stringent adherence to restrictive blood transfusion practices in comparison to pre-COVID era group.

Anemia, characterized by low hemoglobin levels, is a global public health concern. Anemia is an independent factor worsening outcomes in various patient groups. Blood transfusion has been the traditional treatment for anemia; its triggers, primarily based on hemoglobin levels; however, hemoglobin level is not always an ideal trigger for blood transfusion. Additionally, blood transfusion worsens clinical outcomes in certain patient groups. This narrative review explores alternative triggers for red blood cell transfusion and their physiological basis.

The review delves into the physiology of oxygen transport and highlights the limitations of using hemoglobin levels alone as transfusion trigger. The main aim of blood transfusion is to optimize oxygen delivery, necessitating an individualized approach based on clinical signs of anemia and the balance between oxygen delivery and consumption, reflected by the oxygen extraction rate. The narrative review covers different alternative triggers. It presents insights into their diagnostic value and clinical applications, emphasizing the need for personalized transfusion strategies.

Anemia and blood transfusion are significant factors affecting patient outcomes. While restrictive transfusion strategies are widely recommended, they may not account for the nuances of specific patient populations. The search for alternative transfusion triggers is essential to tailor transfusion therapy effectively, especially in patients with comorbidities or unique clinical profiles. Investigating alternative triggers not only enhances patient care by identifying more precise indicators but also minimizes transfusion-related risks, optimizes blood product utilization, and ensures availability when needed. Personalized transfusion strategies based on alternative triggers hold the potential to improve outcomes in various clinical scenarios, addressing anemia's complex challenges in healthcare. Further research and evidence are needed to refine these alternative triggers and guide their implementation in clinical practice.

Although fixed dose regimens using four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) are more widely accepted, using a 'one size fits all' approach remains an area of uncertainty. The primary objective of this study was to compare percentages of haemostasis between fixed dose and weight-based dose 4F-PCC regimens for multiple bleed types and anticoagulants. Secondary objectives compared differences in the time to administration and in-hospital mortality.

This retrospective, cohort study took place at a community hospital and included patients ≥18 years of age receiving 4F-PCC for major bleeding while on either warfarin or a factor-Xa inhibitor between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients received either fixed dose (treatment) or weight-based dose (comparison). Patients who had been treated for a non-urgent procedure, with unknown haemorrhage source, not on anticoagulation, coagulopathic from hepatic failure, had received dabigatran or were allergic to heparin were excluded. Fisher's exact test and logistic regression were used to analyse primary and secondary outcomes.

94 patients met the inclusion criteria; 38 patients were assigned to the treatment group and 56 to the comparator group. There was no statistical evidence of a difference in the achievement of haemostasis between groups (45% vs 46%, p=0.872). The fixed dose patients received the dose on average 13 min faster than weight-based (32 min vs 46 min, p=0.031). There was no difference in mortality (29% vs 29%, p=0.968).

Fixed 4F-PCC regimens may achieve similar outcomes and a faster time to administration compared with weight-based regimens.

To analyze the relationship between initial (within 24 hours) postoperative hemoglobin (Hb) value and prognosis in non-cardiac surgery patients receiving intraoperative blood transfusion, and to provide support for sensible blood use in surgery.

A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients aged 18 or older who underwent non-cardiac surgeries and who received intraoperative blood transfusion at West China Hospital, Sichuan University from 2012 to 2018. According to their initial postoperative Hb levels, the patients were divided into 6 groups, including Hb<75 g/L, 75 g/L≤Hb<85 g/L, 85 g/L≤Hb<95 g/L, 95 g/L≤Hb<105 g/L, 105 g/L≤Hb<115 g/L, and Hb≥115 g/L goups. Multivariate linear regression was performed to examine the differences in the length-of-stay between the groups and binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the differences between the groups in inpatient mortality, the rate of patient voluntary discharge against medical advice, incidence of acute ischemic injury, including acute kidney injury, myocardial infarction, and cerebral infarction, and length-of-stay longer than 28 days. In addition, the effects of multiple interactions between initial postoperative Hb and the types of surgery, the amount of intraoperative red blood cell infusion (red blood cell<8 U vs. red blood cell≥8 U), and preoperative anemia status (Hb<100 g/L vs. Hb≥100 g/L) on postoperative length-of-stay were analyzed.

A total of 7528 patients were included in this study. Compared to those of the reference group, the 95 g/L≤Hb<105 g/L group, the length-of-stay of patients with initial postoperative Hb<75 g/L increased and the mortality (odds ratio [ OR]=2.562) and the rate of voluntary discharge against medical advice ( OR=1.681) increased significantly. Patients in the 75 g/L≤Hb<85 g/L group had increased length-of-stay and increased incidence of acute ischemic injury ( OR=1.778) relative to the reference group. The interaction analysis showed that there was significant interaction between initial postoperative Hb and the types of surgery, which influenced the postoperative length-of-stay.

In non-cardiac surgery patients who have receive blood transfusion, initial postoperative Hb<85 g/L is associated with poorer prognosis. However, those patients with higher initial postoperative Hb did not gain more benefits, suggesting that 85 g/L≤Hb<95 g/L may be the target Hb value for sensible intraoperative transfusion.

In hemodynamically stable patients, both anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion may be detrimental to patients; hence, a decision regarding RBC transfusion should be based on thorough risk-benefit assessment. According to hematology and transfusion medicine organizations, RBC transfusion is indicated when recommended hemoglobin (Hb) triggers are met, and symptoms of anemia are present. The aim of our study was to examine the appropriateness of RBC transfusions in non-bleeding patients at our institution. We performed a retrospective analysis of all RBC transfusions performed between January 2022 and July 2022. The appropriateness of RBC transfusion was based on the most recent Association for the Advancement of Blood and Biotherapies (AABB) guidelines and some additional criteria. The overall incidence of RBC transfusions at our institution was 10.2 per 1000 patient-days. There were 216 (26.1%) RBC units appropriately transfused and 612 (73.9%) RBC units that were transfused with no clear indications. The incidence of appropriate and inappropriate RBC transfusions were 2.6 and 7.5 per 1000 patient-days, respectively. The most frequent clinical situations when RBC transfusion was classified as appropriate were: Hb < 70 g/L plus cognitive problems/headache/dizziness (10.1%), Hb < 60 g/L (5.4%), and Hb < 70 g/L plus dyspnea despite oxygen therapy (4.3%). The most frequent causes of inappropriate RBC transfusions were: no Hb determination pre-RBC transfusion (n = 317) and, among these, RBC transfused as a second unit in a single-transfusion episode (n = 260); absence of anemia sings/symptoms pre-transfusion (n = 179); and Hb concentration ≥80 g/L (n = 80). Although the incidence of RBC transfusions in non-bleeding inpatients in our study was generally low, the majority of RBC transfusions were performed outside recommended indications. Red blood cell transfusions were evaluated as inappropriate mainly due to multiple-unit transfusion episodes, absence of anemia signs and/or symptoms pre- transfusion, and liberal transfusion triggers. There is still the need to educate physicians on appropriate indications for RBC transfusion in non-bleeding patients.

Although blood transfusions can be lifesaving in severe hemorrhage, they can also have potential complications. As anemia has also been associated with poor outcomes in critically ill patients, determining an optimal transfusion trigger is a real challenge for clinicians. This is even more important in patients with acute brain injury who were not specifically evaluated in previous large randomized clinical trials. Neurological patients may be particularly sensitive to anemic brain hypoxia because of the exhausted cerebrovascular reserve, which adjusts cerebral blood flow to tissue oxygen demand.

We described herein the methodology of a prospective, multicenter, randomized, pragmatic trial comparing two different strategies for red blood cell transfusion in patients with acute brain injury: a "liberal" strategy in which the aim is to maintain hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations greater than 9 g/dL and a "restrictive" approach in which the aim is to maintain Hb concentrations greater than 7 g/dL. The target population is patients suffering from traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The primary outcome is the unfavorable neurological outcome, evaluated using the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (eGOS) of 1-5 at 180 days after the initial injury. Secondary outcomes include, among others, 28-day survival, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital lengths of stay, the occurrence of extra-cerebral organ dysfunction/failure, and the development of any infection or thromboembolic events. The estimated sample size is 794 patients to demonstrate a reduction in the primary outcome from 50 to 39% between groups (397 patients in each arm). The study was initiated in 2016 in several ICUs and will be completed in December 2022.

This trial will assess the impact of a liberal versus conservative strategy of blood transfusion in a large cohort of critically ill patients with a primary acute brain injury. The results of this trial will help to improve blood product and transfusion use in this specific patient population and will provide additional data in some subgroups of patients at high risk of brain ischemia, such as those with intracranial hypertension or cerebral vasospasm.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02968654.

Hospital-acquired anemia is common in patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit (ICU). A major source of iatrogenic blood loss in the ICU is the withdrawal of blood for laboratory testing. The aim of our study was to analyze the feasibility and accuracy of non-invasive spot-check pulse co-oximetry (SpHb), and a reduced-volume blood gas analysis (ABG Hb) for the determination of Hb concentration in critically ill patients. Comparisons between Hb determined with test devices and the gold standard—complete blood count (CBC)—were performed using Bland−Altman analysis and concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). The limits of agreement between SpHb and CBC Hb were −2.0 [95%CI −2.3−(−1.7)] to 3.6 (95%CI 3.3−3.9) g/dL. The limits of agreement between ABG Hb and CBC Hb were −0.6 [95%CI −0.7−(−0.4)] to 2.0 (95%CI 1.9−2.2) g/dL. Spearman’s coefficient and CCC between ABG Hb and CBC Hb were 0.96 (95%CI 0.95−0.97, p < 0.001) and 0.91 (95%CI 0.88−0.92), respectively. Non-invasive spot-check Hb co-oximetry is not sufficiently accurate for the monitoring of hemoglobin concentration in critically ill patients. Reduced volume arterial blood gas analysis has acceptable accuracy and could replace complete blood count for the monitoring of Hb concentration in critically ill patients, leading to a significant reduction in blood volume lost for anemia diagnostics.

Anemia is common in older individuals, but it is not known whether the prognostic impact of transfusion differs according to cardiac troponin concentration.

During this 2-year retrospective study in an acute geriatric unit, 514 patients with hemoglobin <10 g/dL and troponin sampling were included. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were compared according to transfusion status and troponin and hemoglobin levels.

Of the 514 anemic patients included (median age 88 years), 157 (31%) had elevated troponin concentrations. These patients were more likely to die at 30 days (49% vs 27%, P < .001) and 1 year (65% vs 51%, P = .004) than patients with normal values. Among patients with elevated troponin concentrations, 30-day mortality tended to be lower in transfused than in not-transfused patients (hazard ratio 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-1.08; P = .07). This association was not found in patients without troponin elevation (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.93; P = .8). Transfusion was associated with 30-day survival in patients with hemoglobin ≤8 g/dL. It was also associated with excess 1-year mortality in patients with hemoglobin >8 g/dL.

This pilot study suggests that transfusion could be associated with better 30-day outcomes in older anemic patients with anemia-related myocardial injury. Thus, troponin levels could be involved in decision-making relative to transfusion in anemic older patients. Clinical trials are needed to establish the benefit of transfusion in patients with elevated troponins.

The majority of ICU patients are anaemic. Anaemia is associated with worse outcomes and a necessity for red blood cell transfusions. ICU patients are a heterogeneous patient group with a broad spectrum of main diagnoses and comorbidities. Evidence-based transfusion trigger guidelines have been established that are dependent on comorbidities. Special attention has been given to blood saving measures and point-of-care diagnosis of coagulation disorders in ICU patients. The administration of intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents can provide useful and individualised alternatives to the administration of red blood cell concentrates in treatment of iron deficiency anaemia. In presence of inflammation and infection, it is challenging to identify the cause of anaemia. The hepcidin-ferroportin pathway may facilitate the diagnosis of anaemia in ICU patients and indicate novel targets in anaemia treatment. This review article presents patient blood management measures and summarises the current literature on transfusion thresholds and alternative therapeutic options using intravenous iron and erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with a key focus on the ICU.

There are no universal guidelines for blood product transfusions in patients with hematologic malignancies (HMs). Excess utilization of platelet and RBC transfusion in patients with HM increases the cost of care and likelihood of adverse events. We aim to decrease the total number of transfused units and multiunit orders of platelets and RBCs in the HM clinic by 25% from March 2020 to December 2020.

A multidisciplinary, interprofessional team was formed. Baseline rates of blood product utilization were determined using Qlik Analytic software. Strategies to improve utilization were developed, and three interventions were initiated. Data were collected on monthly intervals. Data for total number of platelet and RBC units ordered, total multiunit orders, average number of units ordered per encounter, and pretransfusion hemoglobin thresholds were collected from May 2019 to December 2020.

Through our Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles from March 2020 to December 2020, the total number of platelet transfusion orders per month decreased from 164 to 98, multiunit platelet orders decreased from 63 to 2, and the average number of platelet transfusions per encounter decreased from 1.62 to 1.03. The total number of RBC transfusion orders decreased from 172 to 141, multiunit RBC orders decreased from 25 to 16, and the average number of RBC transfusions per encounter decreased from 1.21 to 1.18.

Implementation of our multidisciplinary interventions led to more appropriate use of blood products in the outpatient setting. Ongoing efforts are underway to continue to improve utilization in the inpatient and outpatient setting.

Patients admitted to ICUs are a heterogeneous group, displaying multiple anaemia risk factors and comorbidities. Clinicians should therefore take all possible measures to identify modifiable risks. Patient Blood Management (PBM) is an approach promoting the timely application of evidence-based interventions designed to maintain patients own blood mass.

Within ICU-patients, anaemia is highly prevalent. Generally, anaemia is associated with impaired outcome and need of blood transfusion. Currently, with ICUs working at full capacity and the global blood reserves exhausted, the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic reinforces the need for PBM implementation. For instance, implementation of a comprehensive coagulation management and measures to avoid iatrogenic blood loss may prevent bleeding-associated complications and adherence to blood transfusion guidelines may reduce adverse events associated with transfusion.

Critically ill patients display various morbidities often requiring individualized treatment. PBM offers patient-centred measures to improve outcome any time during hospital stay.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ injury. TTP pathophysiology is based on a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, and is a medical emergency with fatal outcome if appropriate treatment is not initiated promptly.

Authors will review the best options currently available to minimize mortality, prevent relapses, and obtain the best clinical response in patients with immune TTP (iTTP). Available bibliography about iTTP treatment has been searched in Library's MEDLINE/PubMed database from January 1990 until April 2021.

The generalized use of plasma exchange marked a paradigm in the management of iTTP. In recent years, strenuous efforts have been done for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease, improve diagnosis, optimize treatment, reduce mortality, and prevent recurrences. The administration of front-line rituximab and, more recently, the availability of caplacizumab, the first targeted therapy for iTTP, have been steps toward a further reduction in early mortality and for the prevention of relapses.