Hepatitis E is a hepatotropic virus and the most common cause of acute viral hepatitis among adults in India. It has four genotypes, and genotype 1 is mostly associated with sporadic cases. It typically causes self-limiting acute hepatitis following a prodromal course. However, a subset of patients presents with cholestatic features mimicking primary cholestatic liver diseases like primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis. Liver injury ranges from asymptomatic rise of liver enzymes to fulminant liver failure. The hepatitis E virus (HEV) has also been implicated in various extrahepatic manifestations such as acute pancreatitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), radiculopathy, autoimmune hemolysis, and Bell's palsy. We present an interesting case of acute viral hepatitis E presenting with cholestatic jaundice and extrahepatic manifestations.

The prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and its complication, MAFLD-related acute-on-chronic liver failure (MAFLD-ACLF), is rising. Yet, factors determining patient outcomes in MAFLD-ACLF remain understudied.

Patients with MAFLD-ACLF were recruited from the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver-ACLF Research Consortium (AARC registry). The diagnosis of MAFLD-ACLF was made when the treating unit had identified the etiology of chronic liver disease as MAFLD (or previous nomenclature such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-cirrhosis). Patients with coexisting other etiologies of chronic liver disease (such as alcohol, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, etc.) were excluded. Data were randomly split into derivation (n = 258) and validation (n = 111) cohorts at a 70:30 ratio. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality. Only the baseline clinical, laboratory features and severity scores were considered.

The derivation group had 258 patients; 60% were male, with a mean age of 53. Diabetes was noted in 27% and hypertension in 29%. The dominant precipitants included viral hepatitis (hepatitis A virus and hepatitis E virus, 32%), drug-induced injury (drug-induced liver injury, 29%), and sepsis (23%). Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-Sodium (MELD-Na) and AARC scores on admission averaged 32 ± 6 and 10.4 ± 1.9. At 90 days, 51% survived. Nonviral precipitant, diabetes, bilirubin, international normalized ratio, and encephalopathy were independent factors influencing mortality. Adding diabetes and precipitant to MELD-Na and AARC scores, the novel MAFLD-MELD-Na score (+12 for diabetes, +12 for nonviral precipitant), and MAFLD-AARC score (+5 for each) were formed. These outperformed the standard scores in both cohorts.

Almost half of patients with MAFLD-ACLF die within 90 days. Diabetes and nonviral precipitants such as drug-induced liver injury and sepsis lead to adverse outcomes. The new MAFLD-MELD-Na and MAFLD-AARC scores provide reliable 90-day mortality predictions for patients with MAFLD-ACLF.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) stands out as a significant transfusion-transmissible infection, yet it is not included in the screening protocols of many countries. The present study was conducted to assess the cost-benefit implications of incorporating HEV screening among blood donors which is one of the preventive strategies in reducing transfusion transmissible HEV.

A decision tree model was prepared to assist the cost-benefit analysis. The serological screening cost of HEV was estimated based with fixed and variable cost. The cost of illness was estimated with direct and indirect cost. Net present value (NPV) and benefit-cost ratio (BCR) was used to measure the economic variability of screening HEV among the blood donors.

The unit cost of HEV IgM antibody screening is 1000 INR, and the unit cost of illness due to HEV infection is INR 80,122. The NPV and BCR is INR 6,73,001 and 1.7:1 for the probable transfusion-transmitted HEV infection that was averted by the screening of HEV among the blood donors.

Considering the risk of probable HEV transmission through blood transfusion, the study suggests that screening HEV among the blood donors is beneficial in averting transfusion-transmitted HEV infection.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is now endemic worldwide. Most patients with acute infection recover uneventfully. Outbreaks and sporadic cases, particularly in high-risk individuals are emerging increasingly. The patients with risk factors like pregnancy and pre-existing chronic liver disease, present with or progress rapidly to severe disease. Immuno-suppression in post-transplant patients is an additional risk factor. Standardized FDA-approved diagnostic tests are the need of the hour. Further studies are needed to establish guideline-based treatment regimen and outbreak preparedness for HEV to decrease global morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. Policies for screening donors and transplant cases are required.

Acute hepatitis E (AHE) is still a public health issue worldwide. Here, we report the global burden of AHE in 204 countries and territories from 1990 to 2019 by age, sex and socio-demographic index (SDI), and predict the future trends to 2030.

Data on AHE were collected from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study 2019. The average annual percentage change (AAPC) and joinpoint analysis were used to determine the burden trend.

In 2019, there were 19.47 million (95% UI, 16.04 to 23.37 million) incident cases of AHE globally, with a 19% increase since 1990. Age-standardized rate (ASR) of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), prevalent and incident cases declined from 1990 to 2019. In 2019, the ASR of incidence, prevalence and DALYs due to HEV infection were highest in the same regions of South Asia for both sexes. Southern Sub-Saharan Africa presented the highest increases in the ASR for incidence of HEV infection in both males (AAPC = .25) and females (AAPC = .24) from 1990 to 2019. Incident cases are higher in males than females before 55-59 years old. The SDI values were negatively correlated with the age-standardized DALYs. Between 2019 and 2030, the ASR for incidence and prevalence of HEV for both sexes showed an increasing trend.

Although the overall ASR of AHE decreased, the burden of AHE remains an underappreciated problem for society. The findings may provide useful information for policymakers to develop appropriate strategies aimed at reducing the burden of AHE.

A 26-year-old Indian man who had arrived in Japan 24 days prior presented to our hospital with abdominal pain and a fever. A blood test revealed marked hepatic dysfunction, and imaging tests confirmed a diagnosis of acute hepatitis. The patient's liver function and coagulability deteriorated, and his general condition was poor. Given the possibility of fulminant hepatic failure, we initiated steroid pulse therapy. Following the initiation of steroid therapy, the patient's liver function and subjective symptoms rapidly improved. Testing revealed positive findings for IgA-hepatitis E virus, and a genetic analysis of hepatitis E identified genotype 1, which is not endemic to Japan, leading to a definitive diagnosis of imported hepatitis E infection from India. The successful response to steroid therapy highlights the potential benefit of this approach in managing severe cases of acute hepatitis E, a rare occurrence in Japan. This case underscores the importance of considering hepatitis E infection in individuals with a recent travel history to regions with high prevalence and the potential benefits of steroid therapy in managing severe cases of acute hepatitis E.

The administration of vaccines using a combination approach ensures better coverage and reduces the number of injections and cost. The present study assessed liposome-complexed DNA-corresponding proteins of hepatitis E and B viruses (HEV and HBV) as combined vaccine candidates in rhesus monkeys. The HEV and HBV components consisted of 450 bps, neutralizing the epitope/s (NE) region, and 685 bps small (S) envelope gene-corresponding proteins, respectively. Three groups (n = 2 monkeys/group) were intramuscularly immunized with a total of three doses of NE Protein (Lipo-NE-P), NE DNA + Protein (Lipo-NE-DP), and each of NE and S DNA + Protein (Lipo-NES-DP), respectively, given one month apart. All immunized monkeys were challenged with 10,000 fifty percent monkey infectious dose of homologous HEV strain. Post-immunization anti-HEV antibody levels in monkeys were 59.4 and 148.4 IU/mL (Lipo-NE-P), 177.0 and 240.8 IU/mL (Lipo-NE-DP), and 240.7 and 164.9 IU/mL (Lipo-NES-DP). Anti-HBV antibody levels in Lipo-NES-DP immunized monkeys were 58,786 and 6213 mIU/mL. None of the challenged monkeys showed viremia and elevation in serum alanine amino transferase levels. Monkeys immunized with Lipo-NE-DP and Lipo-NES-DP exhibited a sterilizing immunity, indicating complete protection, whereas monkeys immunized with Lipo-NE-P showed limited viral replication. In conclusion, the liposome-complexed DNA-corresponding proteins of HEV and HBV induced protective humoral immune responses to both components in monkeys and are worth exploring further.

Hepatitis E virus infection is a major cause of acute hepatitis, typically self-limiting but occasionally leading to liver failure. Understanding disease progression factors could inform prevention strategies. This study aimed to analyse the characteristics of a large cohort of hospitalised hepatitis E patients in Tianjin, China, and explore factors influencing their progression to liver failure. A total of 1279 hospitalised patients with hepatitis E were included in this cross-sectional study in Tianjin, China. Student's t-test and the Mann-Whitney U-test were used for comparisons. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association. Among these 1279 patients, 107 (8.4%) developed liver failure. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.150-2.887, p = 0.011), liver cirrhosis (95% [CI] 2.229-7.224, p < 0.001), and hepatitis B (95% [CI] 1.159-4.512, p = 0.017) were more likely to progress to liver failure. Hepatitis E patients with comorbid DM, liver cirrhosis, or hepatitis B virus co-infection have higher risks of developing liver failure. Hepatitis E vaccination may be recommended for these vulnerable patients to curb disease severity.

Impaired renal functions have been reported with Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infections, especially with genotypes 3 and 4. These complications were reported during the acute and chronic phases of infection. HEV genotype 1 causes acute infection, and the effect of HEV-1 infections on renal functions is not known. We examined the kidney function parameters in the serum of HEV-1 patients (AHE, n = 31) during the acute phase of infection. All of the included patients developed an acute self-limiting course of infection, without progression to fulminant hepatic failure. We compared the demographic, laboratory, and clinical data between AHE patients with normal kidney function parameters and those with abnormal renal parameters. Out of 31 AHE patients, 5 (16%) had abnormal kidney function tests (KFTs) during the acute phase of infection. Three patients had abnormal serum urea and creatinine, and two patients had either abnormal urea or creatinine. Four out of five patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) below 60 mL/min/1.73 m². AHE patients with abnormal KFTs were older and had a lower level of albumin, but a slightly elevated alanine transaminase (ALT) compared to AHE patients with normal KFTs. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex, liver transaminase levels, and the viral load. Similarly, the clinical presentations were comparable in both groups. Interestingly, these KFTs in patients with abnormal renal parameters returned to normal levels at the recovery. The serum creatinine level was not correlated with patients' age or liver transaminase levels, but it was significantly negatively correlated with albumin level. In conclusion, this study is the first report that evaluated KFTs in patients during the acute phase of HEV-1 infections. Impaired KFTs in some AHE patients resolved at convalescence. KFTs and renal complications should be monitored during HEV-1 infections.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is globally prevalent with relatively high percentages of anti-HEV immunoglobulin G-positive individuals in the populations of developing and developed countries. There are two distinct epidemiological patterns of hepatitis E. In areas with high disease endemicity, primarily developing countries in Asia and Africa, this disease is caused mainly by genotypes HEV-1 or HEV-2; both genotypes transmit predominantly through contaminated water and occur as either outbreaks or sporadic cases of acute hepatitis. The acute hepatitis has the highest attack rate in young adults and is particularly severe among pregnant women. In developed countries, sporadic cases of locally acquired HEV-3 or HEV-4 infection are observed. The reservoir of HEV-3 and HEV-4 is believed to be animals, such as pigs, with zoonotic transmission to humans. The affected persons are often elderly, and persistent infection has been well documented among immunosuppressed persons. A subunit vaccine has been shown to be effective in preventing clinical disease and has been licensed in China.

Enterically transmitted waterborne hepatitis E (HE) caused due to hepatitis E virus (HEV) prevails as a significant public health problem endemic to India. Due to short-term viremia/fecal excretion and poor in vitro transmissibility of HEV, HE diagnosis depends on detection of specific IgM antibodies in serum. Present study evaluated performances of two in-house and six commercial IgM detection enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) using sera collected from volunteers/acute hepatitis patients (n = 716). The in-house ELISAs were based on complete and truncated open reading frame 2 (ORF2) proteins containing neutralizing epitope/s region of genotype 1 HEV (ORF2p, 1-660 amino acid (a.a.) and T1NEp, 458-607 a.a., respectively). The commercial ELISAs included Wantai (China), MP Diagnostics (MPD) (Singapore), DIA.PRO Diagnostics (Italy), MBS (Italy), abia (Germany), and ImmunoVision (USA). T1NE ELISA showed 97.0% positive percent agreement (PPA), 99.4% negative percent agreement (NPA), and 98.6% concordance (κ = 0.97, P = 0.0000) with ORF2 ELISA. ORF2, T1NE, Wantai, and MPD ELISAs agreed on results for 88% of sera tested. Two percent sera showed reactivity in each combination of three and two of aforementioned four ELISAs. Remaining 8% sera were single ELISA reactive. PPA and NPA value ranges were 76.3-99.0% and 84.8-99.5%, respectively. Pairwise concordances between all the eight ELISAs ranged from 88.0 to 100% (κ: 0.74-1.00). Both the in-house ELISAs agreed better with Wantai over MPD ELISA. In conclusion, both ORF2 and T1NE ELISAs were equally efficient in diagnosing HEV infections. T1NEp proved to be an excellent tool in HE sero-diagnosis and is worth exploring in development of simple rapid tests. KEY POINTS: • In-house ELISA based on bacterially expressed neutralizing epitope/s region protein • In-house ELISA based on complete ORF2 protein expressed in insect cells • Comparison of two in-house and six commercial anti-HEV IgM antibody detection ELISAs.