Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Transplant. Sep 18, 2024; 14(3): 93561
Published online Sep 18, 2024. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.93561
Table 1 Karnofsky Performance Status rating and categories for patient functionality
Functional level
Score range (%)
Patient capabilities and care requirements
High function 80-100100%: Fully active, no symptoms of disease
90%: Minor symptoms, fully active
80%: Some symptoms, normal activity with effort
Moderate function50-7070%: Manages self-care, limited activity
60%: Occasionally needs help but manages most personal needs
50%: Requires regular assistance and medical care
Low function 0-4040%: Disabled, requires special assistance
30%: Severely disabled, frequent hospital care
20%: Very ill, active medical intervention needed
10%: Terminally ill, rapid disease progression
0%: Deceased
Table 2 Comparison of patient outcomes by functional status categories, n (%)/mean ± SD
    Functional status at transplant
    
Requires no assistance (n = 251)
Requires some assistance (n = 648)
Near death or severely disabled (n = 355)
Total (n = 1254)
P value
Gender0.0341
    Female130 (51.8)368 (56.8)172 (48.5)670 (53.4)
    Male121 (48.2)280 (43.2)183 (51.5)584 (46.6)
Age (Year)0.222
    n2516483551254
    Mean (SD)40.9 (14.18)42.7 (13.04)42.1 (12.79)42.1 (13.21)
    Median41.044.042.043.0
    Range18.0-73.018.0-72.018.0-70.018.0-73.0
Race0.791
    Hispanic22 (8.8)49 (7.6)31 (8.7)102 (8.1)
    Non-Hispanic Asian3 (1.2)11 (1.7)5 (1.4)19 (1.5)
    Non-Hispanic Black29 (11.6)71 (11.0)43 (12.1)143 (11.4)
    Non-Hispanic White194 (77.3)515 (79.5)275 (77.5)984 (78.5)
    Other/Multiracial3 (1.2)2 (0.3)1 (0.3)6 (0.5)
Patients on life support0.00402
    No242 (96.4)602 (92.9)317 (89.3)1161 (92.6)
    Yes9 (3.6)46 (7.1)38 (10.7)93 (7.4)
Sex match0.161
    No125 (49.8)288 (44.4)177 (49.9)590 (47.0)
    Yes126 (50.2)360 (55.6)178 (50.1)664 (53.0)
Recipient total bilirubin at transplantation (mg/dL)0.00062
    n2496443541247
    Mean (SD)2.2 (5.36)2.3 (4.57)4.6 (8.44)2.9 (6.15)
    Median0.80.81.10.9
    Range0.1-50.00.1-43.00.1-48.20.1-50.0
Serum creatinine at time of transplantation (mg/dL)0.361
    n2516453531249
    Mean (SD)1.0 (0.72)1.1 (0.96)1.2 (1.04)1.1 (0.94)
    Median0.90.90.90.9
    Range0.3-7.60.3-10.10.1-9.00.1-10.1
Total ischemic time (sec)0.0102
    n2226193471188
    Mean (SD)6.9 (1.88)7.5 (2.32)7.5 (2.28)7.4 (2.24)
    Median7.07.37.47.2
    Range1.0-11.80.4-31.50.9-31.70.4-31.7
Recipient's primary diagnosis0.010411
    Short gut syndrome154 (19.8)409 (52.5)216 (27.7)779 (62.1)
    Functional bowel problem27 (28.1) 51 (53.1)18 (18.8)96 (7.7)
    Retransplant4 (6.2) 39 (60.9) 21 (32.8)64 (5.1)
    Others66 (21.0) 149 (47.3) 100 (31.7)315 (25.1)
Donor age (years)0.362
    n2516483551254
    Mean (SD)22.4 (10.79)21.1 (10.54)21.3 (11.47)21.4 (10.86)
    Median20.019.020.019.0
    Range4.0-56.02.0-52.01.0-59.01.0-59.0
Race match0.431
    No119 (47.4)278 (42.9)152 (42.8)549 (43.8)
    Yes132 (52.6)370 (57.1)203 (57.2)705 (56.2)
Weight mismatch0.00691
    NA4 (1.6)7 (1.1)0 (0.0)11 (0.9)
    No mismatch170 (67.7)397 (61.3)201 (56.6)768 (61.2)
    Weight mismatch77 (30.7)244 (37.7)154 (43.4)475 (37.9)
History of diabetes0.0821
    Diabetes21 (8.4)68 (10.5)49 (13.9)138 (11.0)
    Not diabetes230 (91.6)580 (89.5)303 (86.1)1113 (89.0)
Liver function< 0.00011
    Liver dysfunction62 (24.9)148 (23.0)126 (35.6)336 (26.9)
    No dysfunction187 (75.1)496 (77.0)228 (64.4)911 (73.1)
Renal function0.0381
    No dysfunction244 (97.2)617 (95.7)328 (92.9)1189 (95.2)
    Renal dysfunction7 (2.8)28 (4.3)25 (7.1)60 (4.8)
HLA mismatch0.201
    High HLA mismatch208 (87.0)522 (82.6)293 (85.7)1023 (84.3)
    Low HLA mismatch31 (13.0)110 (17.4)49 (14.3)190 (15.7)
Recipient's weight (kg)0.0572
    n2476413551243
    Mean (SD)68.0 (17.35)66.8 (17.16)69.2 (17.83)67.7 (17.41)
    Median65.864.066.865.1
    Range34.0-130.036.3-140.127.4-122.027.4-140.1
Calculated body mass index of recipients (kg/m2)0.282
    n2466353551236
    Mean (SD)23.9 (5.25)23.4 (4.83)23.9 (5.28)23.7 (5.05)
    Median23.222.823.023.0
    Range15.0-40.615.1-41.915.1-44.215.0-44.2
Table 3 Hazard ratios for functional status in transplant outcomes
Variable
TimepointsUnadjusted HR
Adjusted HR1
Functional status
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
None (Ref.) 1 year1.001.00
    Moderate 1.030.84-1.280.771.100.90–1.370.36
    Severe 1.240.99–1.570.0661.561.23–1.980.00029
None (Ref.) 5 years1.001.00
    Moderate 1.030.83–1.270.781.090.89–1.360.38
    Severe1.271.00–1.610.0421.581.24–2.000.00019
Table 4 Hazard ratios for functional status in transplant outcomes for era 2005-2014
Variables
TimepointsUnadjusted HR
Adjusted HR1
Functional status
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
None (Ref.) 1 year1.001.00
    Moderate 1.110.86-1.440.42471.090.84–1.410.52
    Severe 1.631.20–2.230.0021.641.19–2.240.002
None (Ref.) 5 years1.001.00
    Moderate 1.100.85–1.420.4871.080.83–1.390.57
    Severe1.691.24–2.30< 0.00011.701.24–2.32< 0.0001
Table 5 Hazard ratios for functional status in transplant outcomes for era 2014-2022
Variables
TimepointsUnadjusted HR
Adjusted HR1
Functional status
HR
95%CI
P value
HR
95%CI
P value
None (Ref.) 1 year1.001.00
    Moderate 1.120.77–1.640.561.140.78–1.680.49
    Severe 1.481.00–2.180.0491.531.03–2.260.034
None (Ref.) 5 years1.001.00
    Moderate 1.110.76–1.620.591.130.77–1.660.54
    Severe1.481.00–2.190.0461.531.04–2.260.035
Table 6 Prognostic factors for survival in patients with decreased Karnofsky Performance Status undergoing intestinal transplantation
Variable
HR
95%CI
P value
Age1.021.00-1.030.001
Race
    Hispanic1.210.66-2.230.53
    Non-Hispanic Asian1.200.287-4.980.81
    Non-Hispanic Black1.981.27-3.080.003
    Other/Multiracial2.770.38-20.460.32
    Non-Hispanic White (Ref.)1.00
Female gender0.850.62-1.170.32
Donor age1.021.01-1.040.008
Weight matched0.780.55-1.090.008
ICU stay2.131.36-3.380.001
Total bilirubin1.021.01-1.030.04
Total ischemic time1.050.99-1.100.09
Table 7 Post transplant survival probabilities of intestinal transplant recipients by changes in Karnofsky Performance Status after transplant, 95%CI
Time since transplant
Changes in KPS6 months1 year2 years3 years5 years
Low KPS at transplant
Improvement by ≥ 50% (%)100 (100-100)97 (92-100)60 (46-79)51 (37-71)31 (19-51)
Improvement by 10%–40% (%)98 (96-100)80 (71-90)57 (46-70)38 (28-52)17 (9.9-29)
No improvement (%)39 (26-60)21 (11-41)12 (4.8-30)12 (4.8-30)6.1 (1.6-23)
Intermediate KPS at transplant
Improvement by ≥ 30% (%)98 (95-100)95 (89-100)75 (64-87)61 (49-75)48 (37-63)
Improvement by 10%–20% (%)98 (95-100)87 (80-94)71 (63-81)60 (51-70)46 (37-57)
No improvement (%)81 (74-89)62 (53-72)36 (28-47)31 (24-42)21 (14-30)
High KPS at transplant
Decrease by at least 10% (%)81 (68-96)48 (34-70)26 (14-47)16 (7.2-36)13 (5.2-32)
Improvement by ≥ 0% (%)100 (100-100)96 (92-100)76 (66-88)65 (54-79)47 (36-62)
Table 8 Post transplant median survival times of intestinal transplant recipients by changes in Karnofsky Performance Status after transplant, 95%CI
Characteristic
Median survival
Low KPS at transplant
Improvement by = 50%1146 (641-1971)
Improvement by 10%–40%828 (651-1128)
No improvement177 (136-243)
Intermediate KPS at transplant
Improvement by = 30%1783 (945-2369)
Improvement by 10%–20%1712 (1226-2132)
No improvement533 (415-641)
High KPS at transplant
Decrease by at least 10%304 (251-641)
Improvement by = 0%1703 (1331-2556)
Table 9 E-values for the hazard ratios of functional status in transplant outcomes at one year and five years
Functional Status
Timepoints
Adjusted HR1
E-value (point estimate)2
E-value (lower 95%CI)
Moderate1 year1.101.431
Severe1.562.491.76
Moderate5 years
1.091.401
Severe1.582.541.79