Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Transplant. Feb 18, 2023; 13(2): 36-43
Published online Feb 18, 2023. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v13.i2.36
Table 1 Comparison of technologies

Beyer-Berjot et al[17], 2016–Lap Mentor VR
Huber et al[18], 2017-LapSim
Sampogna et al[19], 2017-Oculus Rift and Leap motion
Technology used for trainingVirtual reality
Equipment used for trainingCustom hardware and software-Lap Mentor VRCustom hardware and software-LapSimWindows 10-Oculus Quest Rift S
Additional technology used for trainingHaptic
Additional equipment used for trainingLap Mentor realistic tactile surgical toolsLapSim realistic tactile surgical toolsOculus gestures + Leap Motion
Operating systemLap Mentor softwareLapSim softwareWindows 10
Table 2 Beyer-Berjot et al[17], 2016 and Huber et al[18], 2017 outcome measures
Beyer-Berjot et al[17], 2016–Lap Mentor VR
Huber et al[18], 2017-LapSim
Tasks
Outcome measures
Tasks
Outcome measures
Initial assessmentTime (s)Peg transferTime (s)
Clipping and grasping No. of movementsFine dissectionLeft time (s)
2-Handed maneuversPath length (cm)CholecystectomyRight time (s)
Full laparoscopic sigmoid colectomyTime (z-score)
Median dissectionLeft path length (m)
Lateral dissectionLeft angular path (degree)
AnastomosisLeft grasps (n)
Full LSCRight path length (m)
Right angular path (degree)
Right grasps (n)
Economics (z-score)
Maximum drops (n)
Errors (z-score)
Total (z-score)