Published online Mar 18, 2024. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v14.i1.89674
Peer-review started: November 8, 2023
First decision: November 29, 2023
Revised: December 4, 2023
Accepted: December 29, 2023
Article in press: December 29, 2023
Published online: March 18, 2024
Processing time: 127 Days and 14.6 Hours
Previous assessments of stem cell therapy for spinal cord injuries (SCI) have encountered challenges and constraints. Current research primarily emphasizes safety in early-phase clinical trials, while systematic reviews prioritize effectiveness, often overlooking safety and translational feasibility. This situation prompts inquiries regarding the readiness for clinical adoption.
To offer an up-to-date systematic literature review of clinical trial results con
A systematic search was conducted across major medical databases [PubMed, Embase, Reference Citation Analysis (RCA), and Cochrane Library] up to October 14, 2023. The search strategy utilized relevant Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms and keywords related to "spinal cord", "injury", "clinical trials", "stem cells", "functional outcomes", and "adverse events". Studies included in this review consisted of randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials reporting on the use of stem cell therapies for the treatment of SCI.
In a comprehensive review of 66 studies on stem cell therapies for SCI, 496 papers were initially identified, with 237 chosen for full-text analysis. Among them, 236 were deemed eligible after excluding 170 for various reasons. These studies encompassed 1086 patients with varying SCI levels, with cervical injuries being the most common (42.2%). Bone marrow stem cells were the predominant stem cell type used (71.1%), with various administration methods. Follow-up durations averaged around 84.4 months. The 32.7% of patients showed functional impro
In the realm of SCI treatment, stem cell-based therapies show promise, but clinical trials reveal potential adverse events and limitations, underscoring the need for meticulous optimization of transplantation conditions and parameters, caution against swift clinical implementation, a deeper understanding of SCI pathophysiology, and addressing ethical, tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and immunotoxicity concerns before gradual and careful adoption in clinical practice.
Core Tip: In the context of spinal cord injury (SCI) treatment, stem cell-based therapies exhibit promise, as demonstrated in this systematic review of 66 studies. However, the research reveals potential adverse events and limitations, emphasizing the importance of optimizing transplantation conditions, cautious clinical implementation, a deeper understanding of SCI pathophysiology, and addressing ethical, tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and immunotoxicity concerns before a gradual and careful adoption of stem cell therapy in clinical practice. This underscores the need for further research to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these therapies for SCI patients, while acknowledging their potential for improving functional outcomes.