Polyomaviruses, particularly BK virus, are ubiquitous latent infections that may reactivate with immunosuppression during kidney transplantation, resulting in polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN). The levels of viruria and viremia serve as tools for screening and making a presumptive diagnosis of PVN, respectively, while a definitive diagnosis requires a kidney biopsy. There are histologic classifications of PVN based on the extent of tubular cell viral infection, interstitial fibrosis, and interstitial inflammation. These classifications correlate to some degree with graft function and loss, aiding in determining treatment efficacy and prognostication. PVN has histologic overlap with acute cell-mediated rejection, making the differential diagnosis challenging, although there are suggestive features for these different causes of graft dysfunction. This article reviews the diagnosis, histologic findings, and classifications of PVN, and discusses how to differentiate viral nephropathy from acute rejection.

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal failure, but the limited availability of donors and the risk of immune rejection pose significant challenges. Early detection of acute renal rejection is a critical step to increasing the lifespan of the transplanted kidney. Investigating the clinical, genetic, and histopathological markers correlated to acute renal rejection, as well as finding noninvasive markers for early detection, is urgently needed. It is also crucial to identify which markers are associated with different types of acute renal rejection to manage treatment effectively. This short review summarizes recent studies that investigated various markers, including genomics, histopathology, and clinical markers, to differentiate between different types of acute kidney rejection. Our review identifies the markers that can aid in the early detection of acute renal rejection, potentially leading to better treatment and prognosis for renal-transplant patients.

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving treatment for people with end-stage organ disease. Immune-mediated transplant rejection is a common complication that decreases allograft survival. Although immunosuppression is required to prevent rejection, it also increases the risk of infection. Some infections, such as cytomegalovirus and BK virus, can promote inflammatory gene expression that can further tip the balance toward rejection. BK virus and other infections can induce damage that resembles the clinical pathology of rejection, and this complicates accurate diagnosis. Moreover, T cells specific for viral infection can lead to rejection through heterologous immunity to donor antigen directly mediated by antiviral cells. Thus, viral infections and allograft rejection interact in multiple ways that are important to maintain immunologic homeostasis in solid organ transplant recipients. Better insight into this dynamic interplay will help promote long-term transplant survival.

Objectives: To investigate the immunohistochemical features of different stages of BK virus allograft nephropathy (BKVN) and further elucidate the underlying immunological mechanism involved in the evolution of BKVN. Methods: Fifty-two renal transplant recipients with biopsy proven BKVN were retrospectively selected. According to the third edition of the American Society of Transplantation Infection guidelines, 10 patients were categorized as having mild BKVN (stage A), 25 were moderate (stage B) and 17 were severe (stage C). The differential infiltrations of CD3+ (T lymphocytes), CD4+ (helper T lymphocytes), CD8+ (cytotoxic T lymphocytes), CD20+ (B lymphocytes), CD68+ (macrophages) and CD138+ (plasma cells) cells and the expression of interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R) and human leukocyte antigen DR (HLA-DR) were compared among the three groups. Results: CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD20+, CD138+ and CD68+ cells infiltrations, IL-2R and HLA-DR expression were positive in the BKVN patients. Moreover, with increasing stages of BKVN, the numbers of positively stained inflammatory cells and the expression of IL-2R were significantly increased in the severe group compared to the mild group, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed with regard to HLA-DR expression. Eosinophil and neutrophil infiltration could also be observed in moderate to advanced BKVN. Conclusion: Renal allograft damage caused by BKVN involved T lymphocyte-, B lymphocyte- and mononuclear macrophage-mediated immune responses. Inflammatory cell infiltrations in the renal allograft were probably the driving force for BKVN progression. Additionally, eosinophils and neutrophils may be involved in the pathophysiological mechanism of BKVN.

To investigate the characteristics of BK virus (BKV) specific cellular immune response in the recipients who have early infection with BKV after renal transplantation.

The recipients of renal allografts (n = 30) were divided into groups of BK virus nephropathy (BKVN), viruria, and viremia. The BKV load was observed with real-time fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction in urine and blood every three months. The values of serum creatinine (SCr) were detected. The peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were cultivated with overlapping peptide pool containing BKV structural proteins VP1, VP2, and VP3, and regulatory proteins large tumor antigen (LT-Ag) and small tumor antigen (st-Ag), to stimulate in vitro specific cellular immunoresponse. Flow cytometry was used to measure the proliferation of CD3+/CD4+/CD8+ T and interferon [INF]-γ/interleukin [IL]-2/tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α T cell subsets.

The BKV infection increased SCr values in recipients of renal transplantation. CD4+ T cells were dominant (>90%) in the in vitro cellular immunoresponse to VP1, VP2, VP3, LT-Ag, and st-Ag. At the presence of viremia and BKVN, IL-2/IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells showed significantly decreased in vitro cellular immunoresponse to VP1, VP2, and VP3 (p < 0.05), but insignificantly changed to LT-Ag and st-Ag (p > 0.05). For the cases of viruria and viremia, IL-2/IFN-γ+/TNF-α+ CD4+ T cells showed significantly higher in vitro cellular immunoresponse to VP1, VP2, and VP3 than to LT-Ag and st-Ag (p < 0.05). The immunogenicity of VP1 and VP3 was significantly higher than that of VP2 (p < 0.05).

The BKV infection increases SCr values, and CD4+ T cells are dominant in the in vitro BKV specific cellular immunoresponse in the recipients of renal transplantation. Viremia significantly decreased the immunoresponse to VP1, VP2, and VP3. There is the significantly stronger immunoresponse to VP1 and VP3 when compared with that to VP2, LT-Ag, and st-Ag, suggesting that VP1 and VP3 may be the major targets for the BKV specific immune response.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) occurs in a significant percentage of renal transplant recipients, with BK virus reactivation as the main causative agent. PVAN leads to tubular damage and may result in allograft loss. In this study, we analyzed the antiviral immune response in PVAN. Transcription of the proinflammatory cytokine interleukin-18 (IL-18) was significantly higher in PVAN biopsies compared with T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) (1.42 ± 0.20 and 0.69 ± 0.10, respectively; *P = 0.0021). Tubular expression of IL-18 was significantly increased in PVAN compared with TCMR (2.00 ± 0.24 and 1.333 ± 0.13, respectively; *P = 0.028). In contrast, in TCMR, IL-18 was expressed predominantly by CD163-positive macrophages. These data suggest that the antiviral immune response in PVAN is partly coordinated by the tubular epithelium, whereas in TCMR, this may be controlled by inflammatory cells.

Although both polyomavirus infection and T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR) are characterized by tubulointerstitial inflammation in the renal allograft, these conditions are treated with opposing therapeutic regimens. To gain more insight into the differences between antiviral and alloimmune responses, we performed a case-control study, in which we immunophenotyped the inflammatory infiltrates in renal biopsy specimens with BK polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (BKPyVAN) and specimens with TCMR. Compared with TCMR, BKPyVAN was diagnosed later after transplantation; therefore, BKPyVAN specimens showed more chronic damage than TCMR specimens showed. However, TCMR and BKPyVAN specimens had comparable levels of tubulointerstitial inflammation. Adjustment for confounders in various multivariable models revealed more blood dendritic cell antigen-1(+) (BDCA-1(+)) myeloid dendritic cells (mDCs) present during BKPyVAN (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 5.16; P=0.04) than during TCMR. Double immunostaining for SV40 and BDCA-1 showed that, during BKPyVAN, BDCA-1(+) mDCs localized in proximity to the polyomavirus-infected tubular epithelial cells. We ensured that time of biopsy after transplantation was not a confounding factor by including additional specimens with late TCMR and protocol biopsy specimens matched for biopsy time. These additional specimens showed amounts of BDCA-1(+) mDCs comparable with amounts in the early TCMR specimens. These results suggest that BDCA-1(+) mDCs, known to be involved in the antiviral immune response during various viral infections, might have a pivotal role during BKPyVAN infection in the grafted kidney.