Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS) in liver transplant recipients remains one of the most dreaded complications in liver transplant surgery. PRS can impact the short-term and long-term patient and graft outcomes. The definition of PRS has evolved over the years, from changes in arterial blood pressures and heart and/or decreases in the systemic vascular resistance and cardiac output to including the fibrinolysis and grading the severity of PRS. However, all that did not reflect on the management of PRS or its impact on the outcomes. In recent years, new scientific techniques and new technology have been in the pipeline to better understand, manage and maybe prevent PRS. These new methods and techniques are still in the infancy, and they have to be proven not in prevention and management of PRS but their effects in the patient and graft outcomes. In this article, we will review the long history of PRS, its definition, etiology, management and most importantly the new advances in science and technology to prevent and properly manage PRS.

Machine perfusion (MP) for liver transplantation has become more widespread in the United States, but national studies on this growing practice are lacking. We investigated national use and outcomes of MP for liver transplantation.

Adult (≥18 y) liver recipients transplanted between January 1, 2016 and September 30, 2023 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. We used Cox regression to compare 1-y posttransplant recipient survival and all-cause graft failure by use of MP and performed subgroup analyses among circulatory death (DCD) and brain death (DBD) donors.

Of 52 626 deceased donors with liver recovery, 1799 (3.5%) utilized MP. The proportion of all liver transplants using MP increased from 0.3% in 2016 to 15.5% in 2023. MP for DCD transplants increased from 0.8% in 2016 to 50.0% in 2023. Donors of MP grafts were older (47 [34-57] versus 42 [29-55] y, P < 0.001), had higher body mass indexes (28.3 [24.4-33.3] versus 27.3 [23.7-31.8] kg/m 2 , P < 0.001), and were more likely to be DCD (47.1% versus 9.3%, P < 0.001). Among DBD transplants, MP and non-MP DBD transplants had similar all-cause graft failure out to 1 y (adjusted hazards ratios, 1.12 [95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.43], P = 0.38). Among DCD transplants, MP recipients had improved survival out to 1 y (adjusted hazards ratios, 0.50 [95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.70], P < 0.001).

MP use in liver transplantation is rapidly expanding and is associated with favorable outcomes compared with cold storage. MP is associated with increased posttransplant survival for DCD transplants, highlighting the potential for MP to expand utilization of DCD grafts.

Over the past two decades, the application of machine perfusion (MP) in human liver transplantation has moved from the realm of clinical exploration to routine clinical practice. Both in situ and ex situ perfusion strategies are feasible, safe, and may offer improvements in relevant post-transplant outcomes. An important utility of these strategies is the ability to transplant grafts traditionally considered too risky to transplant using conventional cold storage alone. While dynamic assessment and ultimately transplantation of such livers is an important goal for the international liver transplant community, its clinical application is inconsistent. To this end, ELITA (the European Liver and Intestine Transplant Association) gathered a panel of experts to create consensus guidelines regarding selection, approach, and criteria for deceased donor liver assessment in the MP era. An eight-member steering committee (SC) convened a panel of 44 professionals working in 14 countries in Europe and North America. The SC identified topics related to liver utilisation and assessment for transplantation. For each topic, subtopics were created to answer specific clinical questions. A systematic literature review was performed, and the panel graded relevant evidence. The SC drafted initial statements addressing each clinical question. Statements were presented at the in-person Consensus Meeting on Liver Discard and Viability Assessment during the ELITA Summit held from April 19-20, 2024, in Madrid, Spain. Online voting was held to approve statements according to a modified Delphi method; statements reaching ≥85% agreement were approved. Statements addressing liver utilisation, the definition of high-risk livers, and strategies and criteria for dynamic liver assessment are presented.

Machine perfusion (MP), including hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE), dual HOPE, normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), NMP ischemia-free liver transplantation (NMP-ILT), and controlled oxygenated rewarming (COR), is increasingly being investigated to improve liver graft quality from extended criteria donors and donors after circulatory death and expand the donor pool. This network meta-analysis investigates the comparative efficacy and safety of various liver MP strategies versus traditional static cold storage (SCS). We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials for randomized controlled trials comparing liver transplantation outcomes between SCS and MP techniques. The primary outcome was the incidence of early allograft dysfunction. Secondary endpoints included 1-year graft survival, the incidence of graft failure/loss, post-reperfusion syndrome, biliary complications, the need for renal replacement therapy, graft-related patient mortality, and the length of intensive care unit and hospital stay. R-software was used to conduct a network meta-analysis using a frequentist framework (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024549254). We included 12 randomized controlled trials involving 1628 patients undergoing liver transplantation (801 in the liver MP groups and 832 in the SCS group). Compared to SCS, HOPE/dHOPE, but not other MP strategies, was associated with a significantly lower risk of early allograft dysfunction (RR: 0.53, 95% CI [0.37, 0.74], p =0.0002), improved 1-year graft survival rate (RR: 1.07, 95% CI [1.01, 1.14], p =0.02), decreased graft failure/loss (RR: 0.38, 95% CI [0.16, 0.90], p =0.03), and reduced the risk of biliary complications (RR: 0.52, 95% CI [0.43, 0.75], p < 0.0001). Compared to SCS, NMP (RR: 0.49, 95% CI [0.24, 0.96]) and NMP-ILT (RR: 0.15, 95% CI [0.04, 0.57]), both significantly reduced the risk of postperfusion syndrome. There is no difference between SCS and MP groups in the risk of renal replacement therapy, graft-related patient mortality, and intensive care unit and hospital stay length. Our meta-analysis showed that HOPE/dual-HOPE is a promising alternative to SCS for donor liver preservation. These new techniques can help expand the donor pool with similar or even better post-liver transplantation outcomes.

The role of machine perfusion after kidney transplantation (KT) in extended criteria donors (ECD) is unclear, and the current evidence in the literature remains controversial.

We present an open-label single center randomized trial where 109 patients undergoing KT with ECD grafts between January 2019 and December 2022 were randomized to receive kidneys treated with either hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE, n = 54) or static cold storage (SCS, n = 55) alone. The primary endpoint was the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF). The secondary endpoints included postoperative complications and graft function and survival in the first year after KT.

The trial failed to meet its primary endpoint. DGF developed in 31 (57%) and 37 (67%) patients in the HOPE and SCS groups, respectively (p = 0.3). Posthoc analysis showed that HOPE was associated with a lower risk for DGF for grafts from donors aged 60 years or older (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12-0.87, p = 0.026) and in patients undergoing dual KTs (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.06-0.87, p = 0.031).

HOPE does not reduce the rate of DGF after KT in ECD donors. However, HOPE appears to be associated with better outcomes in the case of older donors and dual KTs.

The number of patients awaiting liver transplant exceeds the number of liver grafts available. However, emerging technologies offer hope. Machine perfusion enhances the preservation, graft quality, and utilization of marginal livers, thereby reducing unnecessary graft discards. Xenotransplantation provides an alternative organ source, augmenting the donor supply or serving as a bridge for critically ill patients. These innovations are described in this review, as the recent clinical applications of these technologies promise to alleviate organ scarcity, improve transplant outcomes, and save lives.

There is currently a supply and demand mismatch in liver transplantation, with more patients needing transplants than grafts available. The use of older donors is one potential way of expanding access to viable grafts. No national study has yet reported on outcomes of liver transplants with donors ≥70 y.

The US Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients registry was queried for deceased donor LT (1988-2021). Balance-of-risk (BAR) score was calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was graft survival. Cubic spline curves were used to evaluate the full spectrum of donor ages.

A total of 148 960 livers met inclusion criteria: 5414 (3.6%) from donors ≥70 y and 4291 (2.9%) recipients ≥70 y. Within the overall cohort, graft survival decreased with increased donor and recipient age. Median graft survival within donors ≥70 y improved over time from 2.2 y (interquartile range [IQR] 0.2-9.8 y) in 1987-1999 to 9.6 y (IQR 3.2-11.6 y) in 2010-2019 (P < 0.0001). Elderly donors had equivalent outcomes to donors <70 y when transplanted in elderly recipients (≥70 y). Outcomes for young recipients that received grafts from elderly donor improved with time, with median survival of 10.1 y (IQR 3.9-11.5 y) in 2010-2019. BAR and survival outcomes following liver transplant (SOFT) scores predicted improved graft survival on time-to-event analysis in all donors aged >70 y. In low-risk recipients, evidenced by preallocation SOFT score <5, elderly donors had comparable outcomes to young (<40 y) and middle-aged donors (40-69 y). Increasing donor age was not associated with worse graft survival in transplants performed between 2010 and 2019.

Donors aged ≥70 y may be more comfortably considered for deceased donor liver transplantation, especially within low-risk recipients. The BAR and SOFT scores may be a useful guide for safely expanding the use of these theoretically riskier liver grafts.

Living liver transplantation has become a significant and evolving aspect of organ transplantation, with a notable proportion of cases involving pediatric patients. Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disease. The growing number of individuals with MAFLD has led to an annual increase in the proportion of non-alcoholic fatty liver donors for pediatric living liver transplantation. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) has been demonstrated to improve graft quality through the implementation of a continuous mechanical perfusion cycle. However, there is currently a paucity of evidence regarding its ability to reduce steatosis and improve prognosis within a shorter time window of living-organ transplantation, especially in primate models. This study simulated steatotic liver grafts in living liver transplantation using the MAFLD model of the cynomolgus monkey and explored the effects of HOPE combined with the AMPK activator AICAR on the amelioration of the donor liver. The left outer lobe livers were statically cold preserved for two hours, subjected to HOPE for two hours, or treated with HOPE + AICAR (1 mmol/L) for two hours, respectively. Subsequently, a normothermic ex vivo reperfusion model (IRM) simulating post-transplant reperfusion was established using diluted autologous blood. Following simulated reperfusion in vitro, steatotic liver grafts in the static cold preservation group exhibited notable reperfusion injury. The degree of reperfusion injury induced by the remaining two groups was reduced, with the HOPE + AICAR group showing the most significant reduction (P < 0.05). The adenosine triphosphate (ATP) level of the hepatic tissues in the HOPE + AICAR group was observed to improve at two hours of reperfusion, exhibiting a significantly higher level than that in the cold-preserved group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the HOPE + AICAR group exhibited a notable decline in MDA levels (P < 0.05), accompanied by a considerable reduction in 8-OHdG and lactate concentrations in both the liver tissue and perfusate. Additionally, there was a marked decrease in the release of TNF-α and IL-6 cytokines, along with a reduction in TLR-4 activation (P < 0.05). In comparison to the cold-preserved and HOPE groups, the HOPE + AICAR group demonstrated the capacity to alter the degree of steatosis following a two-hour treatment period, as evidenced by a notable reduction in liver tissue triglyceride and cholesterol levels (P < 0.05). Additionally, p-AMPK levels in liver tissue were significantly increased in the HOPE + AICAR group (P < 0.05). The combination of HOPE and AMPK activators has been shown to reduce the degree of steatotic liver grafts in a relatively short time, significantly reduce reperfusion injury, and improve liver function. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on mechanical perfusion in primate models, addressing a previously identified gap in the literature.

Ex-situ machine perfusion of the liver has surmounted traditional limitations associated with static cold storage in the context of organ preservation. This innovative technology has changed the landscape of liver transplantation by mitigating ischemia perfusion injury, offering a platform for continuous assessment of organ quality, and providing an avenue for optimizing the use of traditionally marginal allografts. This review summarizes the contemporary clinical applications of machine perfusion devices and discusses potential future strategies for real-time viability assessment, therapeutic interventions, and modulation of organ function after recovery.

The comparison of outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) is hampered by using clinically nonrelevant surrogate endpoints and considerable variability in reported relevant posttransplant outcomes. Such variability stems from nonstandard outcome measures across studies, variable definitions of the same complication, and different timing of reporting. The Clavien-Dindo classification was established to improve the rigor of outcome reporting but is nonspecific to an intervention, and there are unsolved dilemmas specifically related to LT. Core outcome sets (COSs) have been used in other specialties to standardize outcomes research, but have not been defined for LT. Thus, we use the 5 major benchmarking studies published to date to define a 10-measure COS for LT using previously validated metrics. We further provide standard definitions for each of the 10 measures that may be used in international research on the topic. These definitions also include standard time points for recording to facilitate between-study comparisons and future meta-analysis. These 10 outcomes are paired with 3 validated, procedure-independent metrics, including the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complications Index. The Clavien scale and Comprehensive Complications Index are specifically reviewed to enhance their utility in LT, and their use, along with the COS, is explored. We encourage future studies to employ this COS along with the Clavien-Dindo grading system and Comprehensive Complications Index to improve the reproducibility and generalizability of research concerning LT.

While it is currently assumed that liver assessment is only possible during normothermic machine perfusion, there is uncertainty regarding a reliable and quick prediction of graft injury during ex situ hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE). We therefore intended to test, in an international liver transplant cohort, recently described mitochondrial injury biomarkers measured during HOPE before liver transplantation.

Perfusate samples of human livers from ten centers in seven countries with HOPE experience were analyzed for released mitochondrial compounds, i.e. flavin mononucleotide (FMN), NADH, purine derivatives and inflammatory markers. Livers deemed unsuitable for transplantation served as negative controls.

We collected 473 perfusate samples of human donation after cardiac death (n = 315) and donation after brain death (n = 158) livers. Fluorometric assessment of FMN in perfusate was validated by mass spectrometry (R = 0.7011, p <0.0001). Graft loss due to primary non-function or cholangiopathy was predicted by perfusate FMN values (c-statistic mass spectrometry 0.8418, 95% CI 0.7466-0.9370, p <0.0001; c-statistic fluorometry 0.7733, 95% CI 0.7006-0.8461, p <0.0001). Perfusate FMN values were also significantly correlated with symptomatic non-anastomotic strictures and kidney failure, and superior for the prediction of graft loss than conventional scores derived from donor and recipient parameters, such as the donor risk index and the balance of risk score. Mitochondrial FMN values in liver tissues of non-utilized livers were low, and inversely correlated to high perfusate FMN values and purine metabolite release.

This first international study validates the predictive value of the mitochondrial cofactor FMN, released from complex I during HOPE, and may therefore contribute to a better risk stratification of injured livers before implantation.

Analysis of 473 perfusates, collected from ten international centers during HOPE (hypothermic oxygenated perfusion), revealed that mitochondria-derived flavin mononucleotide values in perfusate are predictive of graft loss, cholangiopathy, and kidney failure after liver transplantation. This result is of high clinical relevance, as recognition of graft quality is urgently needed to improve the safe utilization of marginal livers. Ex situ machine perfusion approaches, such as HOPE, are therefore likely to increase the number of useable liver grafts.

Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) is an organ preservation strategy shown to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI)-related complications following liver transplantation. In animal models, HOPE can also decrease alloimmune responses after transplantation, but this remains to be evaluated in humans. Our study, involving 27 patients undergoing liver transplantation enrolled in 2 randomized controlled trials comparing static cold storage with HOPE (14 HOPE-treated and 13 static cold storage-treated), delves into the impact of HOPE on the molecular profile of liver allografts and on the immune responses elicited after transplantation. Following HOPE treatment, fewer intrahepatic immune cells were observed in liver perfusates compared to static cold storage. Analysis of liver tissue transcriptome at reperfusion revealed an effect of HOPE on the reactive oxygen species pathway. Two weeks after transplantation, HOPE recipients exhibited increased circulating CD4+FOXP3+CD127lo regulatory T cells ( p < 0.01), which corresponded to a higher frequency of donor-specific regulatory T cells ( p < 0.01) and was followed by reduced alloreactivity index of CD8+ T cells 3 months after transplant. Our study provides novel mechanistic insight into the capacity of HOPE to influence liver ischemia-reperfusion injury and to modulate effector and regulatory donor-specific T-cell responses after transplantation. These findings, which confirm observations made in animal models, help explain the decreased rejection rates reported in patients receiving HOPE-treated allografts.

Background: Hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion has emerged as a strategy to alleviate ischemic-reperfusion injury in liver grafts. Nevertheless, there is limited data on the effectiveness of hypothermic liver perfusion in evaluating organ quality. This study aimed to introduce a readily accessible real-time predictive biomarker measured in machine perfusate for post-transplant liver graft function. Methods: The study evaluated perfusate analytes over a 90-day postoperative period in 26 patients randomly assigned to receive a liver graft following dual hypothermic machine perfusion in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Machine perfusion was consistently conducted end-ischemically for at least 120 min, with real-time perfusate assessment at 30-min intervals. Graft functionality was assessed using established metrics, including Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD). Results: Perfusate lactate concentration after 120 min of machine perfusion demonstrated significant predictive value for EAD (AUC ROC: 0.841, p = 0.009). Additionally, it correlated with post-transplant peak transaminase levels and extended hospital stays. Subgroup analysis revealed significantly higher lactate accumulation in livers with post-transplant EAD. Conclusions: Liver graft quality can be effectively assessed during hypothermic machine perfusion using simple perfusate lactate measurements. The reliability and accessibility of this evaluation support its potential integration into diverse transplant centers.

Despite strong evidence for improved preservation of donor livers by machine perfusion, longer post-transplant follow-up data are urgently needed in an unselected patient population. We aimed to assess long-term outcomes after transplantation of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE)-treated donor livers based on real-world data (i.e., IDEAL-D stage 4).

In this international, multicentre, observational cohort study, we collected data from adult recipients of HOPE-treated livers transplanted between January 2012 and December 2021. Analyses were stratified by donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD), sub-divided by their respective risk categories. The primary outcome was death-censored graft survival. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of primary non-function (PNF) and ischaemic cholangiopathy (IC).

We report on 1,202 liver transplantations (64% DBD) performed at 22 European centres. For DBD, a total number of 99 benchmark (8%), 176 standard (15%), and 493 extended-criteria (41%) cases were included. For DCD, 117 transplants were classified as low risk (10%), 186 as high risk (16%), and 131 as futile (11%), with significant risk profile variations among centres. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year death-censored graft survival rates for DBD and DCD livers were 95%, 92%, and 91%, vs. 92%, 87%, and 81%, respectively (log-rank p = 0.003). Within DBD and DCD strata, death-censored graft survival was similar among risk groups (log-rank p = 0.26, p = 0.99). Graft loss due to PNF or IC was 2.3% and 0.4% (DBD), and 5% and 4.1% (DCD).

This study shows excellent 5-year survival after transplantation of HOPE-treated DBD and DCD livers with low rates of graft loss due to PNF or IC, irrespective of their individual risk profile. HOPE treatment has now reached IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05520320.

This study demonstrates the excellent long-term performance of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) treatment of donation after circulatory and donation after brain death liver grafts irrespective of their individual risk profile in a real-world setting, outside the evaluation of randomised-controlled trials. While previous studies have established safety, feasibility, and efficacy against the current standard, according to the IDEAL-D evaluation framework, HOPE treatment has now reached the final IDEAL-D stage 4, which further supports its implementation in routine clinical practice.

Dual hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (DHOPE) is increasingly being used to extend liver preservation to improve transplant logistics. However, little is known about its benefits in high-risk liver grafts. This study aimed to investigate whether prolonged DHOPE provides benefits other than improved logistics in all liver types. We performed a national retrospective cohort study of 177 liver transplants from 12 Italian centers preserved with DHOPE for ≥4 hours between 2015 and 2022. A control group of 177 DHOPEs of <4 hours during the same period was created using 1:1 propensity score matching. The impact of risk profiles and preservation times on the outcomes was assessed using univariable and multivariable regression models. No significant differences in posttransplant outcomes were found between prolonged and short DHOPEs. However, the prolonged group had a significantly lower incidence of posttransplant acute kidney injury (AKI) compared to the short group (30.5% vs. 44.6%, p = 0.008). Among prolonged DHOPEs, no differences in transplant outcomes were observed according to donor risk index, Eurotransplant definition for marginal grafts, and balance of risk score. DHOPE duration was associated with a lower risk of AKI in multivariable models adjusted for donor risk index, Eutrotransplant marginal grafts, and balance of risk score. Prolonged hypothermic oxygenated perfusion confirmed its protective effect against AKI in a multivariable model adjusted for donor and recipient risk factors [OR: 0.412, 95% CI: 0.200-0.850, p = 0.016]. Prolonged DHOPE is widely used to improve transplant logistics, provides good results with high-risk grafts, and appears to be associated with a lower risk of posttransplant AKI. These results provide further insight into the important role of DHOPE in preventing posttransplant complications.

Corroborating evidence for the use of hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) prior to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) suggests a beneficial effect in regard to biliary complications. Here, the authors aim to evaluate whether perfusion via portal vein alone (sHOPE) or via additional perfusion of the hepatic artery (dHOPE) have diverging impact on outcomes after OLT when compared to the use of static cold storage (SCS).

Consecutive patients undergoing OLT at the Medical University of Vienna (2018-2023) were retrospectively analyzed. Donor organs were procured using SCS, or subjected to end-ischemic sHOPE or dHOPE. The severity of biliary complications was classified according to the degree of therapeutic intervention (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or surgical revision).

Two hundred forty-seven patients were included (69 SCS, 76 sHOPE, and 102 dHOPE). Hospitalization was shorter for patients after HOPE (median in days: SCS=25 vs HOPE=20, P =0.019). Biliary complications were less frequent in patients after HOPE (SCS=37.7% vs HOPE=22.5%, P =0.015). A significantly lower incidence of surgical revisions for biliary complications was observed in the HOPE cohort (24.6% vs 11.8%, P =0.012). When evaluating outcome according to HOPE-modality, a significant reduction in biliary complications ( P =0.006) and surgical revisions ( P =0.002) was only observed in dHOPE patients in comparison to SCS. Further, only dHOPE was significantly associated with a reduced need for surgical revision for biliary complications upon univariable and multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio=0.336, P =0.011).

HOPE leads to a reduction of biliary complications and associated surgical revisions. This effect seems to be primarily associated with use of dHOPE, while both methods appear as feasible options for preconditioning of donor grafts prior to OLT.

Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and a leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in many countries, including the United States. However, LT for ALD is a complex and evolving field with ethical, social, and medical challenges. Thus, it requires a multidisciplinary approach and individualized decision-making. Short-term and long-term patient and graft survival of patients undergoing LT for ALD are comparable to other indications, but there is a continued need to develop better tools to identify patients who may benefit from LT, improve the pretransplant and posttransplant management of ALD, and evaluate the impact of LT for ALD on the organ donation and transplantation systems. In this review, we summarize the current evidence on LT for ALD, from alcohol-associated hepatitis to decompensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis. We discuss the indications, criteria, outcomes, and controversies of LT for these conditions and highlight the knowledge gaps and research priorities in this field.

Liver transplantation (LT) is a key treatment for primary and secondary liver cancers, reducing tumor burden with concurrent improvement of liver function. While significant improvement in survival is noted with LT, cancer recurrence rates remain high. Mitochondrial dysfunction caused by ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is known to drive tumor recurrence by creating a favorable microenvironment rich in pro-inflammatory and angiogenic factors. Therefore, strategies that decrease reperfusion injury and mitochondrial dysfunction may also decrease cancer recurrence following LT. Machine perfusion techniques are increasingly used in routine clinical practice of LT with improved post-transplant outcomes and increased use of marginal grafts. Normothermic (NMP) and hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) provide oxygen to ischemic tissues, and impact IRI and potential cancer recurrence through different mechanisms. This article discussed the link between IRI-associated inflammation and tumor recurrence after LT. The current literature was screened for the role of machine perfusion as a strategy to mitigate the risk of cancer recurrence. Upfront NMP ("ischemia free organ transplantation") and end-ischemic HOPE were shown to reduce hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in retrospective studies. Three prospective randomized controlled trials are ongoing in Europe to provide robust evidence on the impact of HOPE on cancer recurrence in LT.

Efforts to improve the quality of marginal grafts for transplantation are essential. Machine perfusion preservation appears as a promising solution.

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for deceased liver donor records between 2016 and 2022. The primary outcome of interest was the organ nonutilization rate. Long-term graft and patient survival among extended criteria donors (ECDs) were also analyzed.

During the study period, out of 54 578 liver grafts recovered for transplant, 5085 (9.3%) were nonutilized. Multivariable analysis identified normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) preservation as the only predictor associated with a reduction in graft nonutilization (OR = 0.12; 95% CI = 0.06-0.023, p < 0.001). Further analysis of ECD grafts that were transplanted revealed comparable 1-,2- and 3-years graft survival (89%/88%/82% vs. 90%/85%/81%, p = 0.60), and patient survival (92%/91%/84% vs. 92%/88%/84%, p = 0.65) between grafts that underwent MP vs. those who did not, respectively.

Liver nonutilization rates in the United States are at an all-time high. Available data, most likely including cases from clinical trials, showed that NMP reduced the odds of organ nonutilization by 12% among the entire deceased donor pool and by 16% among grafts from ECD. Collective efforts and further evidence reflecting day-to-day clinical practice are needed to fully reach the potential of MP for liver transplant.

Data on routine hypothermic machine perfusion of livers procured from donors after brain death (DBD) are scarce, and the benefits of the method have only been demonstrated in extended criteria grafts. This study aimed to assess if end-ischemic dual hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (dHOPE) is superior to static cold storage (SCS) in preservation of livers procured from DBD donors with respect to long-term outcomes. Existing data on short-term outcomes favours dHOPE in patients receiving high-risk grafts.

This prospective randomized controlled trial included 104 recipients of DBD livers randomly assigned to SCS arm (78 patients) and the dHOPE arm (26 patients). Endpoints of interest were the occurrence of biliary complications (biliary fistula, anastomotic, and nonanastomotic strictures) and overall patient and graft survival (GS) during the 2-year follow-up.

A total of 36 patients developed biliary complications (at least one event) - six events in dHOPE arm and 30 in SCS arm. There was no significant difference in biliary complications between groups (23.7 vs. 43.4%, P =0.11). No differences were found significant with respect to anastomotic (19.9 vs. 33.7%, P =0.20) and nonanastomotic strictures (0 vs. 11.1%, P =0.10) as well as biliary fistulas (11.7 vs. 12.2%, P =0.93). Survival analysis did not show significantly different results in the study population - overall survival: 92.3% in dHOPE and 83.9% in SCS ( P =0.35), and GS: 92.3 and 81.4% ( P =0.23), respectively. However, a significant difference in GS was noted in recipients of high-risk grafts - 100% in dHOPE and 73.1% in SCS, respectively ( P =0.038).

The long-term outcome data suggest that the routine use of dHOPE may be beneficial for recipients of high-risk grafts from DBD donors. The present study does not provide any evidence for the benefits of dHOPE in low-risk grafts.

Liver transplantation is the only life-saving procedure for children with end-stage liver disease. The field is however heterogenic with various graft types, recipient age, weight, and underlying diseases. Despite recently improved overall outcomes and the expanded use of living donors, waiting list mortality remains unacceptable, particularly in small children and infants. Based on the known negative effects of elevated donor age, higher body mass index, and prolonged cold ischemia time, the number of available donors for pediatric recipients is limited. Machine perfusion has regained significant interest in the adult liver transplant population during the last decade. Ten randomized controlled trials are published with an overall advantage of machine perfusion techniques over cold storage regarding postoperative outcomes, including graft survival. The concept of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) was the first and only perfusion technique used for pediatric liver transplantation today. In 2018 the first pediatric candidate received a full-size graft donated after circulatory death with cold storage and HOPE, followed by a few split liver transplants after HOPE with an overall limited case number until today. One series of split procedures during HOPE was recently presented by colleagues from France with excellent results, reduced complications, and better graft survival. Such early experience paves the way for more systematic use of machine perfusion techniques for different graft types for pediatric recipients. Clinical reports of pediatric liver transplants with other perfusion techniques are awaited. Strong collaborative efforts are needed to explore the effect of perfusion techniques in this vulnerable population impacting not only the immediate posttransplant outcome but the development and success of an entire life.

Hypothermic Oxygenated machine PErfusion (HOPE) can reduce ischemic reperfusion injury and improve outcomes for liver transplant recipients. However, the effect of HOPE on high-risk extended criteria donor (ECD) and donation after circulatory death determination (DCDD) grafts is incomplete, despite the expectation that this cohort benefit maximally from HOPE. Accordingly, this paper aims to characterize the effect of HOPE on ECD and DCDD grafts.

This study includes all papers comparing HOPE to static cold storage for high-risk ECD and DCDD grafts. Systematic searches of Medline, Embase, and Scopus were completed using the terms "HOPE" OR "hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion" AND "liver transplantation". Data were extracted and analyzed using IBM SPSS to perform the meta-analysis.

A total of 2286 records were identified, with 10 meeting the inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of evidence is heterogenous with many papers relying on retrospective controls. However, pooled analysis demonstrates HOPE to significantly reduce the rate of early allograft dysfunction, 12-month graft failure, re-transplantation, total biliary complications, and non-anastomotic strictures for high-risk grafts.

There is good evidence that HOPE improves outcomes following liver transplantation across a number of biochemical and clinical endpoints for high-risk grafts. Of note, the reduction in biliary complications and re-transplantation is particularly significant given the morbidity associated with these endpoints. However, further, high-quality prospective trials with contemporary controls and clinically relevant primary endpoints are needed to better define the impact of HOPE for this cohort of grafts.

Over the last 50 years, liver transplantation has evolved into a procedure routinely performed in many countries worldwide. Those able to access this therapy frequently experience a miraculous risk-benefit ratio, particularly if they face the imminently life-threatening disease. Over the decades, the success of liver transplantation, with dramatic improvements in early posttransplant survival, has aggressively driven demand. However, despite the emergence of living donors to augment deceased donors as a source of organs, supply has lagged far behind demand. As a result, rationing has been an unfortunate focus in recent decades. Recent shifts in the epidemiology of liver disease combined with transformative innovations in liver preservation suggest that the underlying premise of organ shortage may erode in the foreseeable future. The focus will sharpen on improving equitable access while mitigating constraints related to workforce training, infrastructure for organ recovery and rehabilitation, and their associated costs. Research efforts in liver preservation will undoubtedly blossom with the aim of optimizing both the timing and conditions of transplantation. Coupled with advances in genetic engineering, regenerative biology, and cellular therapies, the portfolio of innovation, both broad and deep, offers the promise that, in the future, liver transplantation will not only be broadly available to those in need but also represent a highly durable life-saving therapy.

The use of machine perfusion in solid organ transplantation has developed tremendously worldwide in recent years. Although the number of randomized controlled trials in the field of organ preservation is still limited, machine perfusion has been shown to be superior to static cold storage of donor organs. Various devices for clinical use with hypothermia or normothermia are already available for most organs. Whether and which perfusion strategy is superior to the others is the subject of current clinical research. This also applies to the further evaluation of possible synergistic effects in the sequential use of the various protocols. The common goal of all dynamic perfusion technologies is to optimize organ preservation between removal and transplantation. By testing the quality of marginal donor organs prior to transplantation, it should also be possible to use these organs without exposing the patient to increased risk. This can lead to a significant expansion of the donor pool. This is particularly important in Germany, where there is an ongoing shortage of organs and restrictive legislation regarding the expansion of the donor pool. Furthermore, the perfusion technology offers the possibility to serve as a platform for other ex situ and in situ therapies on isolated organs. In addition to the conditioning of pre-damaged organs for transplantation, this could lead to further applications in the context of targeted organ therapies and also to improved transplant logistics in the future.

Machine perfusion has been adopted into clinical practice in Europe since the mid-2010s and, more recently, in the United States (US) following approval of normothermic machine perfusion (NMP). We aim to review recent advances, provide discussion of potential future directions, and summarize challenges currently facing the field.

Both NMP and hypothermic-oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) improve overall outcomes after liver transplantation versus traditional static cold storage (SCS) and offer improved logistical flexibility. HOPE offers additional protection to the biliary system stemming from its' protection of mitochondria and lessening of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) is touted to offer similar protective effects on the biliary system, though this has not been studied prospectively.The most critical question remaining is the optimal use cases for each of the three techniques (NMP, HOPE, and NRP), particularly as HOPE and NRP become more available in the US. There are additional questions regarding the most effective criteria for viability assessment and the true economic impact of these techniques. Finally, with each technique purported to allow well tolerated use of riskier grafts, there is an urgent need to define terminology for graft risk, as baseline population differences make comparison of current data challenging.

Machine perfusion is now widely available in all western countries and has become an essential tool in liver transplantation. Identification of the ideal technique for each graft, optimization of viability assessment, cost-effectiveness analyses, and proper definition of graft risk are the next steps to maximizing the utility of these powerful tools.

Hypothermic Oxygenated machine PErfusion (HOPE) has recently emerged as a preservation technique which can reduce ischemic injury and improve clinical outcomes following liver transplantation. First developed with the advent solid organ transplantation techniques, hypothermic machine perfusion largely fell out of favour following the development of preservation solutions which can satisfactorily preserve grafts using the cheap and simple method, static cold storage (SCS). However, with an increasing need to develop techniques to reduce graft injury and better utilise marginal and donation after circulatory death (DCD) grafts, HOPE has emerged as a relatively simple and safe technique to optimise clinical outcomes following liver transplantation. Perfusing the graft with cold, acellular, oxygenated perfusate either via the portal vein (PV) alone, or via both the PV and hepatic artery (HA), HOPE is generally commenced for a period of 1-2 h immediately prior to implantation. The technique has been validated by multiple randomised control trials, and pre-clinical evidence suggests HOPE primarily reduces graft injury by decreasing the accumulation of harmful mitochondrial intermediates, and subsequently, the severity of post-reperfusion injury. HOPE can also facilitate real time graft assessment, most notably via the measurement of flavin mononucleotide (FMN) in the perfusate, allowing transplant teams to make better informed clinical decisions prior to transplantation. HOPE may also provide a platform to administer novel therapeutic agents to ex situ organs without risk of systemic side effects. As such, HOPE is uniquely positioned to revolutionise how liver transplantation is approached and facilitate optimised clinical outcomes for liver transplant recipients.

The shortage of donor organs remains an unresolved issue in livertransplantation worldwide. Consequently, strategies for expanding the donor pool are currently being developed. Donors meeting extended criteria undergo thorough evaluation, as livers obtained from marginal donors yield poorer outcomes in recipients, including exacerbated reperfusion injury, acute kidney injury, early graft dysfunction, and primary nonfunctioning graft. However, the implementation of machine perfusion has shown excellent potential in preserving donor livers and improving their characteristics to achieve better outcomes for recipients. In this review, we analyzed the global experience of using machine perfusion in livertransplantation through the history ofthe development ofthis method to the latest trends and possibilities for increasing the number of liver transplants.

Optimizing graft preservation is key for ex-situ split grafts in pediatric liver transplantation (PSLT). Hypothermic Oxygenated Perfusion (HOPE) improves ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) and post-operative outcomes in adult LT. This study compares the use of HOPE in ex-situ partial grafts to static cold storage ex-situ partial grafts (SCS-Split) and to the gold standard living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). All consecutive HOPE-Split, SCS-Split and LDLT performed between 2018-2023 for pediatric recipients were included. Post-reperfusion syndrome (PRS, drop ≥30% in systolic arterial pressure) and reperfusion biopsies served as early indicators of IRI. We included 47 pediatric recipients (15 HOPE-Split, 17 SCS-Split, and 15 LDLT). In comparison to SCS-Split, HOPE-Split had a significantly shorter cold ischemia time (CIT) (470min vs. 538 min; p =0.02), lower PRS rates (13.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.04) and a lower IRI score (3 vs. 4; p = 0.03). The overall IRI score (3 vs. 3; p = 0.28) and PRS (13.3% vs. 13.3%; p = 1) after HOPE-Split were comparable to LDLT, despite a longer CIT (470 min vs. 117 min; p < 0.001). Surgical complications, one-year graft, and recipient survival did not differ among the groups. In conclusion, HOPE-Split mitigates early IRI in pediatric recipients in comparison to SCS-Split, approaching the gold standard of LDLT.