Highly sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation face substantial challenges due to the presence of potential donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). These antibodies increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), but also complicate their access to HLA compatible transplantation. Although advancements in allocation priority programs, such as the Spanish Program for the Access of Highly Sensitized Patients to Kidney Transplantation (PATHI), have introduced virtual crossmatching (v-XM) to streamline compatibility assessments, patients with >99,5 % virtual panel reactive antibodies (vPRA) often remain on waiting lists for extended periods with minimal chances of receiving a transplant. This article summarizes Spanish guidelines for a harmonized and comprehensive framework for the management of highly sensitized patients. These guidelines focus on strategies to facilitate transplantation in the presence of DSA, including a stepwise approach to delist HLA antigens, prioritizing those recognized as "less deleterious" antibodies, to expand transplant options while minimizing immunological risks. Conventional desensitization techniques are discussed, alongside the innovative use of imlifidase to enable transplants in particularly complex cases. Post-transplant monitoring protocols are also exposed, with a focus on early detection of antibody rebound and effective management of ABMR. Ultimately, this resource offers clinicians a structured framework to navigate the intricate challenges of kidney transplantation in high-risk populations, aiming to enhance access to life-saving procedures and improve patient outcomes.

Imlifidase is an endopeptidase known for cleaving anti-Human Leucocyte Antigen donor-specific antibodies (DSA) to allow high-risk kidney transplantation. However, it lacks comprehensive data regarding its effect on alloantibodies targeting other histocompatibility antigens, such as Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related protein A (MICA). This study describes the dynamics of anti-MICA antibodies following imlifidase administration in a kidney transplant recipient with anti-MICA*002 preformed DSA. Imlifidase induced a notable reduction in anti-MICA antibodies, followed by a rebound of the anti-MICA DSA after 14 days. Subsequent to early antibody-mediated rejection, the combination of immunoadsorption and daratumumab infusion proved effective in removing all anti-MICA antibodies at day 45 after transplantation. These findings shed light on the management of anti-MICA antibodies, an area still lacking consensus in current clinical practice. This research underscores the significance of imlifidase in addressing pretransplant anti-MICA and other antibodies directed against non-HLA targets, extending its therapeutic utility in kidney transplantation.

Imlifidase is an IgG-cleaving endopeptidase conditionally approved in Europe for desensitization of highly sensitized patients before kidney transplantation. We present 5-y outcomes and donor-specific antibody (DSA) levels for clinical trial participants from a single site who received imlifidase for desensitization before incompatible transplantation (NCT02790437).

Imlifidase was administered up to 24 h before living or deceased donor kidney transplantation. DSAs were monitored before transplantation, at days 7 and 28, and at 5 y posttransplant.

At 5 y, 7 of 8 participants were alive. One of these 7 had suboptimal graft function secondary to donor-derived disease but remained dialysis independent. Three participants had antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which occurred in the first 30 d in all cases and was successfully treated. No new episodes of suspected or biopsy-proven AMR occurred after 30 d posttransplant. Seven participants had DSA rebound. DSAs commonly persisted 5 y posttransplant, although they were generally lower strength compared with pre-imlifidase. Dilution studies of sensitized serum enabled the identification of lower AMR risk phenotypes for persisting DSAs. Severe and/or opportunistic infections were not observed at greater than expected frequency.

Five-year outcomes of imlifidase-enabled incompatible transplants are overall favorable. DSA rebound is common, but antibody strength lessens in the long term, and longitudinally persisting DSAs did not lead to premature graft failure.

The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system plays a critical role in transplant immunology, influencing outcomes through various immune-mediated rejection mechanisms. Hyperacute rejection is driven by preformed donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) targeting HLAs, leading to complement activation and graft loss within hours to days. Acute rejection typically occurs within six months post-transplantation, involving cellular and humoral responses, including the formation of de novo DSAs. Chronic rejection, a key factor in long-term graft failure, often involves class II DSAs and complex interactions between the innate and adaptive immune systems. Advancements in HLA antibody detection, particularly single antigen bead (SAB) assays, have improved the sensitivity and characterization of DSAs. However, these assays face challenges like false positives from denatured antigens and false negatives due to low antibody titers or complement competition. Furthermore, molecular mismatch (MM) analysis has emerged as a potential tool for refining donor-recipient compatibility but faces some issues such as a lack of standardization. Highly sensitized patients with calculated panel-reactive antibodies (cPRA) of 100% face barriers to transplantation. Strategies like serum dilution, novel therapies (e.g., Imlifidase), and delisting approaches could refine immunological risk assessment and delisting strategies are essential to expand transplant opportunities for these patients.

Highly sensitized (HS) patients in need of kidney transplantation (KTx) typically spend a longer time waiting for compatible kidneys, are unlikely to receive an organ offer, and are at increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Desensitization using imlifidase, which is more rapid and removes total body immunoglobulin G (IgG) to a greater extent than other methods, enables transplantation to occur between HLA-incompatible (HLAi) donor-recipient pairs and allows patients to have greater access to KTx. However, when the project was launched there was limited data and clinical experience with desensitization in general and with imlifidase specifically. Hence, this Delphi methodology was used to reach a consensus from a multi-disciplinary team (MDT) of experts from 15 countries on the management of HS patients undergoing imlifidase HLAi from a deceased donor (DD) KTx. This Delphi consensus provides clinical practice guidance on the use of imlifidase in the end-to-end management of HS patients undergoing an HLAi DD KTx and supports centers in the development of guidelines for the utilization and integration of imlifidase into clinical practice.

The role of the complement system in antibody mediated rejection (AMR) emerged in the last decades, and the demonstration of the presence of complement fragments in renal allograft biopsies is a consolidated diagnostic sign of AMR. However, antibodies against donor antigens may lead to microvascular inflammation and endothelial injury even in the absence of complement activation, and growing evidence suggests that complement-independent mechanisms may be prominent in late (i.e., occurring >6 months after transplantation) vs early AMR. Different donor specific antibodies (DSA) with different biological features and complement activation ability may be involved in late or early AMR. Downregulation of tissue complement inhibitors may happen early after transplantation, partially due to ischemia reperfusion injury, and could facilitate complement activation in early vs late AMR. Clinical and histological features of late AMR and C4d negative AMR seem to converge, and this narrative review analyzes the evidence that supports lower complement activation in late vs early AMR, including differential C4d staining prevalence based on the time after transplantation, differential response to anti-complement therapy and other direct and indirect signs of the complement system activation. The therapeutic approach in early vs late AMR should take into account possible differences in the pathophysiological mechanisms of microvascular inflammation and endothelial injury in early vs late AMR.

Despite the donor-exchange program implementation for highly sensitized (HS) patients, no improvement in waiting list in those HS patients with 100% calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) is observed. Recently, it has been published the treatment with imlifidase in desensitization algorithm. However, there are low-risk strategies to reduce cPRA. A cPRA of <99.95% increase donor offer chances, so delisting (DL) strategies should be addressed in cPRA reduction. We propose an integral approach for DL from low to intermediate risk to assess the 100% HS patients on waiting list.

The common DL criteria for previously forbidden alleles were that they should neither have been present in previous transplants nor possess complement fixation ability. Low-risk phase of DL is based on historical mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of <5000 in the last 2 years. The next phase risk is based on single-antigen test in 1/10 diluted serum with MFI value of <3000; without eplet mismatch (low-intermediate risk specificity), or with eplet mismatch from previous transplants (intermediate risk). The molecular mismatch may be assessed with the mismatch calculator tool from registry website (https://www.epregistry.com.br/).

Low-risk DL approaches are now widely used to reduce cPRA in HS patients; however, sometimes it is not enough to get transplanted and new tools are needed. Despite new treatments with imlifidase, some cases had anti-human leukocyte antigen rebound levels with a higher risk of rejection. Here, we propose a scaled DL approach would be a better therapeutic approach for HS patients whenever possible.

Presensitized patients with circulating donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) before transplantation are at risk for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Peritransplant desensitization mitigates but does not eliminate the alloimmune response. We examined the possibility that subthreshold AMR activity undetected by histology could be operating in some early biopsies.

Transcriptome of kidney allograft biopsies performed within the first month in presensitized patients (DSA+) who had received desensitization and did not develop active/probable AMR by histology (R-) was compared with biopsies showing active/probable AMR (R+/DSA+). As negative controls, biopsies without rejection by histology in patients without DSA at transplantation were used (R-/DSA-). RNA sequencing from biopsies selected from the biobank was used in cohort 1 (n = 32) and microarray, including the molecular microscope (Molecular Microscope Diagnostic System [MMDx]) algorithm, in recent cohort 2 (n = 30).

The transcriptome of R-/DSA+ was similar to R+/DSA+ as these groups differed in 14 transcripts only. Contrarily, large differences were found between both DSA+ groups and negative controls. Fast gene set enrichment analyses showed upregulation of the immune system in both DSA+ groups (gene ontology terms: adaptive immune response, humoral immune response, antigen receptor-mediated signaling, and B-cell receptor signaling or complement activation) when compared with negative controls. MMDx assessment in cohort 2 classified 50% of R-/DSA+ samples as AMR and found no differences in AMR molecular scores between R+ and R- DSA+ groups. In imlifidase desensitization, MMDx series showed a gradual increase in AMR scores over time.

Presensitized kidney transplant recipients exhibited frequent molecular calls of AMR in biopsy-based transcript diagnostics despite desensitization therapy and negative histology.

Based on promising results obtained in primate models, pioneers in the US have now started to explore the new frontier of genetically-edited pig-to-human transplantation. The recent transition of xenotransplantation into clinical medicine has included transplants in brain-dead subjects and the compassionate use of xenotransplants in living recipients without options for allotransplantation. While the barrier of hyperacute rejection seems to be successfully overcome by gene editing of donor pigs, the occurrence of accelerated rejection could pose significant limitations to the success of the procedure. Ultimately, the establishment of efficient and safe strategies to overcome immunologic barriers will, among other critical factors, such as potential xenozoonotic disease transmission or physiological differences, determine whether and for which indications xenotransplantation will be viable. Considering preliminary outcomes of compassionate use xenotransplantions, which may raise questions about how faithfully data from non-human primate models translate into human outcomes, further research in decedents may be necessary before proceeding with additional clinical transplants. Looking ahead, designing systematic trials in xenotransplantation, including the definition of acceptable eligibility criteria for such high-risk transplants, will be an immense challenge, especially in kidney transplantation, where dialysis provides an effective alternative to transplantation in most cases.

The safety and benefit of the anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab, which induces lysis of antibody-producing plasma cells in sensitized patients prior to kidney transplantation, remain to be determined.

A 2-phase (1 and 2), monocentric open-label study was conducted to evaluate the month 6 (M6) safety and efficacy of daratumumab in kidney transplant candidates with calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) > 95%. In the first (safety) phase, we used 4-weekly escalating doses of daratumumab. Phase 2 tested desensitization with 8 weekly infusions of 16 mg/kg daratumumab. cPRA 10,000 was calculated considering only human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of > 10,000.

Nine patients were enrolled in phase 1 and 14 in phase 2. Safety analysis showed 4 serious non-treatment-emergent adverse events (non-TEAEs), 36 mild TEAEs, mostly infusion-related reactions, grade 1 and 2 (causing 2 temporary drug discontinuations), but no serious TEAEs. Significant reductions in anti-HLA antibodies were observed at month 3 (M3), with cPRA 10,000 (P = 0.003), number of anti-HLA (P < 0.001), maximum MFI (MFI max) (P = 0.053), and the sum of MFI (MFI sum) (P < 0.001), with complete return to baseline levels at month 12 (M12). At M6, 46.15% (19.22%-74.87%) and 76.92% (46.19%-94.96%) of patients showed sustained response (1% decrease in cPRA) for cPRA 2000 and 10,000, respectively. At month 1 (M1), immune cells (T-reg, CD8 + TEMRA, CD19 + CD138 + B cells, and NK cells) significantly decreased. At M3, other antibodies decreased significantly, but returned to baseline levels at M12, except for gamma globulins, without any infectious complications.

The first use of daratumumab in desensitization demonstrated infusion-related adverse (AEs) events and rapid, albeit transient, reductions in anti-HLA antibodies, with less than 40% of durable responders, limiting its potential clinical use.

Imlifidase is authorized for desensitization of highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch (XM) against a deceased donor. Here, we report on the results for the first 9 patients transplanted in this context who had at least 3 months of follow-up.

The eligibility criteria were as follows: calculated panel reactive antibodies (cPRA) ³ 98%, ³ 3 years on the waiting list, immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) > 6000 (and < 5000 at 1:10 dilution) and a negative post-imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxic XM (CDCXM).

All 9 patients had been on dialysis for an average of 123 ± 41 months, with cPRA at 99% (n = 2) or 100% (n = 7). At transplantation, the mean number of DSAs was 4.3 ± 1.4. The median immunodominant DSA MFI was 9153 (6430-16,980). Flow cytometry XM (FCXM) and CDCXM before imlifidase were positive in 9 and 2 patients, respectively. After 1 injection of imlifidase, all were negative. Patients received polyclonal antibodies, i.v. Igs (IVIg), rituximab, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate. Five patients had a DSA rebound within the first 14 days: 2 had concomitant clinical antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), 2 had subclinical ABMR, and 1 had isolated positive C4d staining. No ABMR was observed in patients without rebound. Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology Collaboration formula estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 56 ± 22 ml/min per 1.73 m2 at the last follow-up (7 ± 2.8 months). No graft loss or death were observed. Four patients developed at least 1 infection.

These real-life data demonstrate that the use of imlifidase to desensitize highly sensitized patients can have an acceptable short-term efficacy and safety profile in selected patients.

Immunosuppression is essential to ensure recipient and graft survivals after liver transplantation (LT). However, our understanding and management of the immune system remain suboptimal. Current immunosuppressive therapy cannot selectively inhibit the graft-specific immune response and entails a significant risk of serious side effects, i.e., among others, de novo cancers, infections, cardiovascular events, renal failure, metabolic syndrome, and late graft fibrosis, with progressive loss of graft function. Pharmacological research, aimed to develop alternative immunosuppressive agents in LT, is behind other solid-organ transplantation subspecialties, and, therefore, the development of new compounds and strategies should get priority in LT. The research trajectories cover mechanisms to induce T-cell exhaustion, to inhibit co-stimulation, to mitigate non-antigen-specific inflammatory response, and, lastly, to minimize the development and action of donor-specific antibodies. Moreover, while cellular modulation techniques are complex, active research is underway to foster the action of T-regulatory cells, to induce tolerogenic dendritic cells, and to promote the function of B-regulatory cells. We herein discuss current lines of research in clinical immunosuppression, particularly focusing on possible applications in the LT setting.

In HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation, the efficacy of desensitization in terms of anti-HLA antibody kinetics is not well characterized. We present an overview of the course of anti-HLA antibodies throughout plasma exchange (PE) desensitization in a series of crossmatch-positive patients.

All consecutive candidates in the Dutch HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation program between November 2012 and January 2022 were included. The eligibility criteria were a positive crossmatch with a living kidney donor and no options for compatible transplantation. Desensitization consisted of 5-10 PE with low-dose IVIg.

A total of 16 patient-donor pairs were included. Patients had median virtual panel-reactive antibody of 99.58%. Cumulative donor-specific anti-HLA antibody (cumDSA) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was 31 399 median, and immunodominant DSA (iDSA) MFI was 18 677 for class I and 21 893 for class II. Median anti-HLA antibody MFI response to desensitization was worse in class II as compared with class I (P < 0.001), particularly for HLA-DQ. Class I cumDSA MFI decreased 68% after 4 PE versus 53% in class II. The decrease between the fifth and the 10th PE sessions was modest with 21% in class I versus 9% in class II. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 85% of patients, with the iDSA directed to the same mismatched HLA as before desensitization, except for 3 patients, of whom 2 had vigorous rebound of antibodies to repeated mismatches (RMMs). Rebound was highest (86%) in RMM-DSA with prior grafts removed (transplantectomy n = 7), lower (39%) in non-RMM-DSA (n = 30), and lowest (11%) for RMM-DSA with in situ grafts (n = 5; P = 0.018 for RMM-DSA transplantectomy versus RMM-DSA graft in situ). With a median follow-up of 59 mo, 1 patient had died resulting in a death-censored graft survival of 73%.

Patients with class II DSA, and particularly those directed against HLA-DQ locus, were difficult to desensitize.

Humoral immunity is a major waypoint towards chronic allograft dysfunction in lung transplantation (LT) recipients. Though allo-immunization and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) are well-known entities, some diagnostic gaps need to be addressed. Morphological analysis could be enhanced by digital pathology and artificial intelligence-based companion tools. Graft transcriptomics can help to identify graft failure phenotypes or endotypes. Donor-derived cell free DNA is being evaluated for graft-loss risk stratification and tailored surveillance. Preventative therapies should be tailored according to risk. The donor pool can be enlarged for candidates with HLA sensitization, with strategies combining plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin and immune cell depletion, or with emerging or innovative therapies such as imlifidase or immunoadsorption. In cases of insufficient pre-transplant desensitization, the effects of antibodies on the allograft can be prevented by targeting the complement cascade, although evidence for this strategy in LT is limited. In LT recipients with a humoral response, strategies are combined, including depletion of immune cells (plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption), inhibition of immune pathways, or modulation of the inflammatory cascade, which can be achieved with photopheresis. Altogether, these innovative techniques offer promising perspectives for LT recipients and shape the 21st century's armamentarium against AMR.

Systemic dosing of adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors poses potential risk of adverse side effects including complement activation triggered by anti-capsid immunity. Due to the multifactorial nature of toxicities observed in this setting, a wide spectrum of immune modulatory regimens are being investigated in the clinic. Here, we discover an IgM cleaving enzyme (IceM) that degrades human IgM, a key trigger in the anti-AAV immune cascade. We then engineer a fusion enzyme (IceMG) with dual proteolytic activity against human IgM and IgG. IceMG cleaves B cell surface antigen receptors and inactivates phospholipase gamma signaling in vitro. Importantly, IceMG is more effective at inhibiting complement activation compared with an IgG cleaving enzyme alone. Upon IV dosing, IceMG rapidly and reversibly clears circulating IgM and IgG in macaques. Antisera from these animals treated with IceMG shows decreased ability to neutralize AAV and activate complement. Consistently, pre-conditioning with IceMG restores AAV transduction in mice passively immunized with human antisera. Thus, IgM cleaving enzymes show promise in simultaneously addressing multiple aspects of anti-AAV immunity mediated by B cells, circulating antibodies and complement. These studies have implications for improving safety of AAV gene therapies and possibly broader applications including organ transplantation and autoimmune diseases.

Potential kidney transplant patients with HLA-specific antibodies have reduced access to transplantation. Their harmful effects are mediated by the Fc portion of IgG, including activation of the complement system and Fc receptor-initiated cytotoxic processes by circulating leucocytes. Avoiding antibody incompatibility is the conventional approach, but for some patients this can mean extended waiting times, or even no chance of a transplant if there are no alternative, compatible donors. For these cases, pretransplant antibody removal may provide access to transplantation. Plasmapheresis is currently used to achieve this, with acceptable outcome results, but the process can take days to reduce the antibody levels to a safe level, so has limited use for deceased donors. There is now an alternative, in the form of an IgG-digesting enzyme, Imlifidase, which can be administered for in vivo IgG inactivation. Imlifidase cleaves human IgG, separating the antigen-binding part, F(ab')2 from Fc. Typically, within six hours of dosing, most, if not all, of the circulating IgG has been inactivated, allowing safe transplantation from a previously incompatible donor. For deceased donor transplantation, where minimizing cold ischaemia is critical, this six-hour delay before implantation should be manageable, with the compatibility testing processes adjusted to accommodate the treatment. This agent has been used successfully in phase 2 clinical trials, with good short to medium term outcomes. While a donation rate that matches demand may be one essential answer to providing universal access to kidney transplantation, this is currently unrealistic. IgG inactivation, using Imlifidase, is, however, a realistic and proven alternative.

The transplantation of highly sensitized patients remains a major obstacle. Immunized patients wait longer for a transplant if not prioritized, and if transplanted, their transplant outcome is worse.

We report a successful AB0- and HLA-incompatible living donor kidney transplantation in a 35-year-old female patient with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and antiphospholipid syndrome. The patient had a positive T- and B-cell complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch and previous graft loss due to renal vein thrombosis. We treated the patient with intravenous immunoglobulins, rituximab, horse anti-thymocyte globulin, daratumumab, and imlifidase, besides standard immunosuppression. All IgG antibodies were sensitive to imlifidase treatment. Besides donor-specific HLA antibodies, anti-dsDNA antibodies and antiphospholipid antibodies were cleaved. The patient initially had delayed graft function. Two kidney biopsies (day 7 and day 14) revealed acute tubular necrosis without signs of HLA antibody-mediated rejection. On posttransplant day 30, hemodialysis was stopped, and creatinine levels declined over the next weeks to a baseline creatinine of about 1.7 mg/dL after 12 months.

In this case, a novel multimodal treatment strategy including daratumumab and imlifidase enabled successful kidney transplantation for a highly immunized patient with antiphospholipid antibodies.

This study investigates kidney transplant outcomes in highly sensitised patients after implementing a delisting strategy aimed at enabling transplantation despite preformed donor-specific antibodies (preDSA), with the goal of reducing acute antibody-mediated rejection (aAMR) risk. Fifty-three sensitised recipients underwent kidney transplant after delisting prohibited HLA antigens, focusing initially in low MFI antibodies (<5000), except for anti-HLA-DQ. If insufficient, higher MFI antibodies were permitted, especially for those without an immunogenic eplet pattern assigned. Delisting of Complement-fixing antibodies (C1q+) was consistently avoided. Comparison cohorts included 53 sensitised recipients without DSA (SwoDSA) and 53 non-sensitised (NS). The average waiting time prior to delisting was 4.4 ± 1.8 years, with a reduction in cPRA from 99.7 ± 0.5 to 98.1 ± 0.7, followed by transplantation within 7.2 ± 8.0 months (analysed in 34 patients). Rejection rates were similar among preDSA, SwoDSA, and NS groups (16%, 8%, and 11%, respectively; p = 0.46). However, aAMR was higher in the preDSA group (12%, 4%, and 2%, respectively; p = 0.073), only presented in recipients with DSA of MFI >5000. The highest MFI DSA were against HLA-DP (Median: 10796 MFI), with 50% of preDSA aAMR cases due to anti-DP antibodies (n = 3). Graft survival rates at 1 and 5 years in preDSA group were 94%, and 67%, comparable to SwoDSA (94%, and 70%; p = 0.69), being significantly higher in the NS group (p = 0.002). The five-year recipient survival rate was 89%, comparable to SwoDSA and NS groups (p = 0.79). A delisting strategy enables safe kidney transplant in highly sensitised patients with preDSA, with a slight increase in aAMR and comparable graft and patient survivals to non-DSA cohorts.

The increasing number of highly immunized patients waiting for kidney transplantation is a significant problem in Europe as the proportion of such patients has doubled in the last decade. Transplantation in this group is enabled by desensitization methods, i.e., intravenous pharmacotherapy with human immunoglobulin (IVIG), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), and plasma exchange. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol.

The inclusion criteria: presence of established anti-HLA antibodies with complement-binding capacity, i.e., anti-HLAC1q+ (>MFI 15,000 for the most common antigens), no renal transplantation within 1 year after activation on the waiting list. Thirteen patients were selected for the procedure. IVIG was administered twice (2 g/kg-maximum 140 g/dose). Between IVIG doses, patients received rituximab (375 mg/m2). Anti-HLA was tested after 1 and 2 months after completion of the procedure.

All patients have completed the protocol. No significant changes after desensitization in the amount/profile of alloantibodies were observed. However, with negative vCM for HLA-A/B/DR (no DSA against the reported donor) and negative CM-CDC, according to the allocation system, patients were given priority on the recipient list. Seven out of 13 patients received a transplant within 12 months after treatment (mean 11.5 weeks). Renal graft function was good (mean creatinine level after 1 month: 1.5 mg/dL). No incidents of acute rejection were reported. The most common complications were infections (especially pneumonia).

The desensitization protocol (IVIG + rituximab) allows highly immunized patients to undergo organ transplantation. In short-term analysis, no acute rejection was observed, graft function was satisfactory. Desensitization was associated with an increased risk of infection.

Donor exchange programs were designed to allocate organs for highly sensitized (HS) patients. The allocation algorithm differs slightly among countries and includes different strategies to improve access to transplants in HS patients. However, many HS patients with a calculated panel reactive of antibodies (cPRA) of 100 % remain on the waiting list for a long time. Some allocation algorithms assume immunological risk, including Imlifidase treatment, to increase the chance of transplantation in very HS patients. Here, we describe our unicenter experience of low-risk delisting strategy in 15 HS patients included in the Spanish donor exchange program without donor offers. After delisting, 7 out of 15 HS patients reduced the cPRA below 99.95 % and impacted the reduction of time on the waiting list (p = 0.01), where 5 out of 7 achieved transplantation. Within those HS that remained above 99.95 %, 1 out of 8 was transplanted. All the HS were transplanted with delisted DSA, and only one with DSA level rebounded early after transplantation. All HS transplanted after delisting maintain graft function. The transplant immunology laboratories are challenged to search intermediate risk assessment methods for delisting high HS patients.

An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.

Nephrology is an ever-evolving field of medicine. The importance of such a discipline is related to the high clinical impact of kidney disease. In fact, abnormalities of kidney function and/or structure are common in the general population, reaching an overall prevalence of about 10%. More importantly, the onset of kidney damage is related to a strikingly high risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, and progression to kidney failure which, in turn, compromises quality and duration of life. Attempts to comprehend the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved in kidney disease occurrence have prompted the development and implementation of novel drugs in clinical practice with the aim of treating the 'specific cause' of kidney disease (including chronic kidney disease, glomerular disease, and genetic kidney disorders) and the main immunological complications following kidney transplantation. Herein, we provide an overview of the principal emerging drug classes with proved efficacy in the context of the aforementioned clinical conditions. This can represent a simplified guide for clinical nephrologists to remind them of the vast and heterogeneous armamentarium of drugs that should be used in the present and the future to improve the management of patients suffering from kidney disease.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%.

Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization.

Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.

As the number of patients living with kidney failure grows, the need also grows for kidney transplantation, the gold standard kidney replacement therapy that provides a survival advantage. This may result in an increased rate of transplantation from HLA-mismatched donors that increases the rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which already is the leading cause of allograft failure. Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab), bortezomib and splenectomy have been used over the years to treat AMR as well as to prevent AMR in high-risk sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the C5 protein of the complement pathway and part of the expanding field of anticomplement therapies, which is not limited to kidney transplant recipients, and also includes complement-mediated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and ANCA-vasculitis. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the pathophysiological background and use of anti-C5 strategies (eculizumab and ravulizumab) and C1-esterase inhibitor in AMR, either to prevent AMR in high-risk desensitized patients or to treat AMR as first-line or rescue therapy and also to treat de novo thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.

Kidney transplantation, the gold-standard therapeutic approach for patients with end-stage kidney disease, offers improvement in patient survival and quality of life. However, broad sensitization against human leukocyte antigens often resulting in a positive crossmatch against the patient's living donor or the majority of potential deceased donors in the allocation system represents a major obstacle due to a high risk for antibody-mediated rejection, delayed graft function and allograft loss. Kidney-paired donation and desensitization protocols have been established to overcome this obstacle, with limited success. Imlifidase, a novel immunoglobulin G (IgG)-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes and recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli, is a promising agent for recipients with a positive crossmatch against their organ donor with high specificity towards IgG, rapid action and high efficacy in early pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, the rebound of IgG after a few days can lead to antibody-mediated rejection, making the administration of potent immunosuppressive regimens in the early post-transplant phase necessary. There is currently no comparative study evaluating the efficiency of imlifidase therapy compared with conventional desensitization protocols along with the lack of randomized control trials, indicating the clear need for future large-scale clinical studies in this field. Besides providing a practical framework for the clinical use of the agent, our aim in this article is to evaluate the underlying mechanism of action, efficiency and safety of imlifidase therapy in immunologically high-risk kidney transplant recipients.

Imlifidase, derived from a Streptococcus pyogenes enzyme, cleaves the entire immunoglobulin G pool within hours after administration in fully cleaved antigen-binding and crystallizable fragments. These cleaved fragments can no longer exert their antibody-dependent cytotoxic functions, thereby creating a window to permit HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation. Imlifidase is labeled, in Europe only, for deceased donor kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients, whose chances for an HLA-compatible transplant are negligible. This review discusses outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies on imlifidase and describes the phase III desensitization trials that are currently enrolling patients. A comparison is made with other desensitization methods. The review discusses the immunological work-up of imlifidase candidates and especially the "delisting strategy" of antigens that shift from unacceptable to acceptable with imlifidase desensitization. Other considerations for clinical implementation, such as adaptation of induction protocols, are also discussed. Imlifidase cleaves most of the currently used induction agents except for horse antithymocyte globulin, and rebound of donor-specific antibodies should be managed. Another consideration is the timing and interpretation of (virtual) crossmatches when bringing this novel desensitization agent into the clinic.

Heart transplantation (HTx) is the only definitive therapy for patients with end stage heart disease. With the increasing global prevalence of heart failure, the demand for HTx has continued to grow and outpace supply. In this paper, we will review advances in the field of HTx along the clinical journey of a HTx recipient. Starting with the sensitized patient, we discuss current methods to define sensitization, and assays to help identify clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies. Desensitization strategies targeting all levels of the adaptive immune system are discussed with emphasis on novel techniques such as anti-CD 38 blockade and use of the Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus Pyogenes. We next discuss donor procurement and the resurgence of donation after circulatory death as a viable strategy to significantly and safely increase the donor pool. Post-transplant, we evaluate non-invasive surveillance techniques including gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA. Last, we discuss the ground-breaking developments in the field of xenotransplantation.

Bacterial recombinant cysteine protease Ides (imlifidase, Idefirix®, Hansa Biopharma) is used to prevent humoral transplant rejection in highly HLA-sensitized recipients, and to control IgG-mediated autoimmune diseases. We report the case of a 51 years old woman suffering from lupus nephritis with end stage kidney disease, grafted for the second time and pre-treated with imlifidase. The patient was HLA-hypersensitized (calculated Panel Reactive Antibodies [Abs], cPRA>99 %) and has three preformed Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA). Circulating immunoglobulins were monitored at initiation (0, 6, 36, 72 and 96 h), and at Ab recovery one and two months following imlifidase injection. From baseline, the higher depletion was reported after 36h for total IgG (-75 %) and IgG subclasses (-87 % for IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3, -78 % for IgG4), while no significant impact on IgA and IgM was observed. Anti-SSA 60 kDa and anti-SSB auto-Abs quickly decreased after imlifidase injection (-96 % for both after 36 h) as well as post-vaccinal specific IgG (-95 % for tetanus toxoid, -97 % for pneumococcus and -91 % for Haemophilus influenzae Abs after 36 h). At the Ab recovery phase, total IgG and anti-SSA60/SSB Abs reached their initial level at two months. Regarding alloreactive Abs, anti-HLA Abs including the three DSA showed a dramatic decrease after injection with 100 % depletion from baseline after 36 h as assessed by multiplex single bead antigen assay, leading to negative crossmatches using both lymphocytotoxicity (LCT) and flow cell techniques. DSA rebound at recovery was absent and remained under the positivity threshold (MFI = 1000) after 6 months. The findings from this case report are that imlifidase exerts an early depleting effect on all circulating IgG, while IgG recovery may depend in part from imlifidase's capacity to target memory B cells.

Gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is a promising therapeutic strategy for multiple inherited diseases. Following intravenous injection, AAV vectors carrying a copy of the missing gene or the genome-editing machinery reach their target cells and deliver the genetic material. Several clinical trials are currently ongoing and significant success has already been achieved with at least six AAV gene therapy products with market approval in Europe and the United States. Nonetheless, clinical trials and preclinical studies have uncovered several limitations of AAV gene transfer, which need to be addressed in order to improve the safety and enable the treatment of the largest patient population. Limitations include the occurrence of immune-mediated toxicities, the potential loss of correction in the long run, and the development of neutralizing antibodies against AAV vectors preventing re-administration. In this review, we summarize these limitations and discuss the potential technological developments to overcome them. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of French Society of Pediatrics.

Antibodies can mediate immune recruitment or clearance of immune complexes through the interaction of their Fc domain with cellular Fc receptors. Clustering of antibodies is a key step in generating sufficient avidity for efficacious receptor recognition. However, Fc receptors may be saturated with prevailing, endogenous serum immunoglobulin and this raises the threshold by which cellular receptors can be productively engaged. Here, we review the factors controlling serum IgG levels in both healthy and disease states, and discuss how the presence of endogenous IgG is encoded into the functional activation thresholds for low- and high-affinity Fc receptors. We discuss the circumstances where antibody engineering can help overcome these physiological limitations of therapeutic antibodies. Finally, we discuss how the pharmacological control of Fc receptor saturation by endogenous IgG is emerging as a feasible mechanism for the enhancement of antibody therapeutics.

Whether immunoadsorption (IADS) as part of desensitization protocols could facilitate deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) in highly sensitized (HS) patients remains to be proven. We retrospectively analyzed our IADS based desensitization protocol for deceased donor KTs between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen HS patients (age 52 years [40-56]) were included. Waiting time before IADS was 6 years [5-10] and the interval between IADS initiation and KT was 5 months [1-12] for the 14 transplanted patients. Nine patients had prior KT. Calculated panel reactive antibody decreased significantly during the protocol (99.3% [92.5-99.9] vs. 79.4% [56.7-81.9]; p = 0.004). Death-censored graft survival was 85.7% at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. One-year median plasma creatinine level was 135 µmol/L [111-202]. Six developed active antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) at 1 year, with a median delay of 13 days [11-26]. Eight patients developed severe infections, including two fatal outcomes. Finally, compared to 93% of patients who received desensitization receiving a KT, only 43% of a control with similar characteristics underwent transplantation. However, no difference was found in overall probability of being alive with a functioning graft at the end of follow-up. The results indicate that our IADS-based desensitization strategy was not effective due to a high rate of ABMR and severe infectious complications which pose a challenge to its universalization.

Despite the advances in immunosuppressive medications, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to be a major cause of kidney allograft failure and remains a barrier to improving long-term allograft survival. Recently, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological process of AMR, along with the development of new therapeutic options. Additionally, surveillance protocols with donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene profile testing have been established, leading to the early detection of AMR. A multitude of clinical trials are ongoing, opening numerous opportunities for improving outcome in kidney transplant recipients. In this brief review, we discuss the emerging therapies for managing both active and chronic active AMR and highlight the ongoing clinical trials.

Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.