1
|
Masuda S, Lemaitre F, Barten MJ, Bergan S, Shipkova M, van Gelder T, Vinks S, Wieland E, Bornemann-Kolatzki K, Brunet M, de Winter B, Dieterlen MT, Elens L, Ito T, Johnson-Davis K, Kunicki PK, Lawson R, Lloberas N, Marquet P, Millan O, Mizuno T, Moes DJAR, Noceti O, Oellerich M, Pattanaik S, Pawinski T, Seger C, van Schaik R, Venkataramanan R, Walson P, Woillard JB, Langman LJ. Everolimus Personalized Therapy: Second Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology. Ther Drug Monit 2025; 47:4-31. [PMID: 39331837 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000001250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The Immunosuppressive Drugs Scientific Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology established the second consensus report to guide therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of everolimus (EVR) and its optimal use in clinical practice 7 years after the first version was published in 2016. This version provides information focused on new developments that have arisen in the last 7 years. For the general aspects of the pharmacology and TDM of EVR that have retained their relevance, readers can refer to the 2016 document. This edition includes new evidence from the literature, focusing on the topics updated during the last 7 years, including indirect pharmacological effects of EVR on the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 with the major mechanism of direct inhibition of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1. In addition, various concepts and technical options to monitor EVR concentrations, improve analytical performance, and increase the number of options available for immunochemical analytical methods have been included. Only limited new pharmacogenetic information regarding EVR has emerged; however, pharmacometrics and model-informed precision dosing have been constructed using physiological parameters as covariates, including pharmacogenetic information. In clinical settings, EVR is combined with a decreased dose of calcineurin inhibitors, such as tacrolimus and cyclosporine, instead of mycophenolic acid. The literature and recommendations for specific organ transplantations, such as that of the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, as well as for oncology and pediatrics have been updated. EVR TDM for pancreatic and islet transplantation has been added to this edition. The pharmacodynamic monitoring of EVR in organ transplantation has also been updated. These updates and additions, along with the previous version of this consensus document, will be helpful to clinicians and researchers treating patients receiving EVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satohiro Masuda
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Himeji Dokkyo University, Himeji, Japan
| | - Florian Lemaitre
- Université de Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, IRSET-UMR S 1085, Rennes, France
- INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1414, Rennes, France
- FHU SUPPORT, Rennes, France
| | - Markus J Barten
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Surgery, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stein Bergan
- Department of Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital and Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Teun van Gelder
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Sander Vinks
- Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- NDA Partners, A Propharma Group Company, Washington District of Columbia
| | | | | | - Mercè Brunet
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Brenda de Winter
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maja-Theresa Dieterlen
- Laboratory Management Research Laboratory, Cardiac Surgery Clinic, Heart Center Leipzig GmbH, University Hospital, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Laure Elens
- Integrated Pharmacometrics, Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacokinetics Research Group (PMGK) Louvain Drug for Research Institute (LDRI), Catholic University of Louvain, (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Taihei Ito
- Department of Organ Transplant Surgery; Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Toyoake Aichi, Japan
| | - Kamisha Johnson-Davis
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Pawel K Kunicki
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Roland Lawson
- University of Limoges, Inserm U1248, Pharmacology & Transplantation, Limoges, France
| | - Nuria Lloberas
- Nephrology Department, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge-Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pierre Marquet
- University of Limoges, Inserm U1248, Pharmacology & Transplantation, Limoges, France
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, France
| | - Olga Millan
- Pharmacology and Toxicology Laboratory, Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics Department, Biomedical Diagnostic Center, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, Spain
| | - Tomoyuki Mizuno
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Dirk Jan A R Moes
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy & Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Ofelia Noceti
- National Center for Liver Transplantation and Liver Diseases, Army Forces Hospital, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - Michael Oellerich
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Smita Pattanaik
- Department of Pharmacology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Tomasz Pawinski
- Department of Drug Chemistry, Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Ron van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Raman Venkataramanan
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy and Department of Pathology, Starzl Transplantation Institute, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Phil Walson
- University Medical School, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jean-Baptiste Woillard
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacovigilance, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France; and
| | - Loralie J Langman
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Oomen L, Bootsma-Robroeks CMHHT, Bouts AHM, Carbonell Pradas M, Gander R, Kienzl-Wagner K, König P, Pereira PL, Dunand O, Mosca SMFS, Pac M, Podracka L, Prytula AA, Sangermano M, Vitkevic R, Zieg J, van der Zanden LFM, Feitz WFJ, de Wall LL. Pediatric kidney transplantation in Europe, a clinical snapshot pilot. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1432027. [PMID: 39513158 PMCID: PMC11540619 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1432027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/07/2024] [Indexed: 11/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Pediatric kidney transplantations are rarely performed, and there is limited knowledge about the diversity in current clinical practices across Europe. This study aims to explore the utility of clinical snapshot studies in identifying these disparities, establishing a foundation for future snapshot studies and standardization efforts. Methods A pilot clinical snapshot study was conducted, with invitations extended to all 109 pediatric kidney transplant centres in Europe. Each participating centre provided pre-, peri-, and postoperative data concerning their most recent thirty transplantations. The primary outcomes encompassed the evaluation of disparities in donor-recipient selection, surgical techniques, post-operative drainage procedures, and immunosuppressive therapy protocols. Secondary outcomes involved the analysis of rejection rates, incidence of infections, and graft survival. Results The study involved 439 patients from fifteen centres (14%) in twelve countries, with varying transplant volumes (range 1-29 transplantations per year) and follow-up periods. Significant differences were found among centres in terms of donor types, cold and warm ischemia time, pre-emptive transplant rates, and kidney transplant drainage methods. The rate of living donors varied between 3% and 90% and the median duration of cold ischemia ranged was 770 min after deceased donation and 147 min after living donation. Basiliximab was the dominant induction therapy, yet steroid withdrawal varied widely. Infection, rejection, and graft survival rates also varied significantly between centres. Conclusion This study revealed substantial variation in clinical practices among European centres performing pediatric kidney transplantations. These findings could serve as a stimulus for international dialogue and collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes Oomen
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children’s Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Charlotte M. H. H. T. Bootsma-Robroeks
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Radboudumc Amalia Children’s Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Nephrology, Beatrix Children’s Hospital, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen,Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Antonia H. M. Bouts
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mar Carbonell Pradas
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Romy Gander
- Pediatric Urology and Renal Transplant Unit, Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Vall d´Hebron Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Katrin Kienzl-Wagner
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Paul König
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Olivier Dunand
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital of Réunion, La Réunion, France
| | - Sara M. F. S. Mosca
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Centro Materno Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
| | - Michal Pac
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Transplantation and Hypertension, Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Ludmila Podracka
- 1st Dept Pediatric Children’s Hospital, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Agnieszka A. Prytula
- Department of Paediatric Nephrology and Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, ERKNet Centre, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maria Sangermano
- Pediatric Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplant Unit, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Renata Vitkevic
- Department of Pediatrics, Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Klinikos, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jakub Zieg
- Department of Pediatrics, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, Prague, Czechia
| | | | - Wout F. J. Feitz
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children’s Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth L. de Wall
- Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Radboudumc Amalia Children’s Hospital, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kotton CN, Kamar N, Wojciechowski D, Eder M, Hopfer H, Randhawa P, Sester M, Comoli P, Tedesco Silva H, Knoll G, Brennan DC, Trofe-Clark J, Pape L, Axelrod D, Kiberd B, Wong G, Hirsch HH. The Second International Consensus Guidelines on the Management of BK Polyomavirus in Kidney Transplantation. Transplantation 2024; 108:1834-1866. [PMID: 38605438 PMCID: PMC11335089 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 01/10/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BK polyomavirus (BKPyV) remains a significant challenge after kidney transplantation. International experts reviewed current evidence and updated recommendations according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Risk factors for BKPyV-DNAemia and biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy include recipient older age, male sex, donor BKPyV-viruria, BKPyV-seropositive donor/-seronegative recipient, tacrolimus, acute rejection, and higher steroid exposure. To facilitate early intervention with limited allograft damage, all kidney transplant recipients should be screened monthly for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia loads until month 9, then every 3 mo until 2 y posttransplant (3 y for children). In resource-limited settings, urine cytology screening at similar time points can exclude BKPyV-nephropathy, and testing for plasma BKPyV-DNAemia when decoy cells are detectable. For patients with BKPyV-DNAemia loads persisting >1000 copies/mL, or exceeding 10 000 copies/mL (or equivalent), or with biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy, immunosuppression should be reduced according to predefined steps targeting antiproliferative drugs, calcineurin inhibitors, or both. In adults without graft dysfunction, kidney allograft biopsy is not required unless the immunological risk is high. For children with persisting BKPyV-DNAemia, allograft biopsy may be considered even without graft dysfunction. Allograft biopsies should be interpreted in the context of all clinical and laboratory findings, including plasma BKPyV-DNAemia. Immunohistochemistry is preferred for diagnosing biopsy-proven BKPyV-nephropathy. Routine screening using the proposed strategies is cost-effective, improves clinical outcomes and quality of life. Kidney retransplantation subsequent to BKPyV-nephropathy is feasible in otherwise eligible recipients if BKPyV-DNAemia is undetectable; routine graft nephrectomy is not recommended. Current studies do not support the usage of leflunomide, cidofovir, quinolones, or IVIGs. Patients considered for experimental treatments (antivirals, vaccines, neutralizing antibodies, and adoptive T cells) should be enrolled in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille N. Kotton
- Transplant and Immunocompromised Host Infectious Diseases Unit, Infectious Diseases Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Toulouse Rangueil University Hospital, INSERM UMR 1291, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (Infinity), University Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - David Wojciechowski
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Michael Eder
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helmut Hopfer
- Division of Medical Genetics and Pathology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Parmjeet Randhawa
- Division of Transplantation Pathology, The Thomas E. Starzl Transplantation Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Martina Sester
- Department of Transplant and Infection Immunology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany
| | - Patrizia Comoli
- Cell Factory and Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Unit, Department of Mother and Child Health, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Helio Tedesco Silva
- Division of Nephrology, Hospital do Rim, Fundação Oswaldo Ramos, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Greg Knoll
- Department of Medicine (Nephrology), University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jennifer Trofe-Clark
- Renal-Electrolyte Hypertension Division, Associated Faculty of the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA
- Transplantation Division, Associated Faculty of the Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, PA
| | - Lars Pape
- Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Axelrod
- Kidney, Pancreas, and Living Donor Transplant Programs at University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
| | - Bryce Kiberd
- Division of Nephrology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Germaine Wong
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Kidney Research, The Children’s Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hans H. Hirsch
- Division of Transplantation and Clinical Virology, Department of Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Engen RM, Bartosh SM. Long-term outcomes of two-dose alemtuzumab induction in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14753. [PMID: 38623881 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alemtuzumab is a lymphocyte depleting agent used for induction in kidney transplant, but long-term information on its use in pediatric recipients remains sparse. METHODS We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study of 57 pediatric kidney transplant recipients receiving alemtuzumab 20 mg/m2/dose ×2 doses for induction immunosuppression. All patients underwent surveillance biopsies, and 91.3% underwent steroid withdrawal by day 4 post-transplant. Outcomes of interest included graft survival, development of donor specific antibodies (DSA), incidence of viremia and PTLD, and duration of lymphopenia. RESULTS Median follow-up time was 7.9 years (IQR 5-13.6 years). Median graft survival was 16.5 years (95% CI 11.6-unknown). DSA developed in 36.5% at a median of 944 days (IQR 252-2113 days). Incidences of BK polyomavirus DNAemia (BKPyV-DNAemia), CMV DNAemia, and EBV DNAemia were 38.6%, 22.8%, and 14%, respectively; one patient developed PTLD at 13.3 years post-transplant. Median duration of lymphopenia was 365 days (IQR 168-713 days); 19.3% of patients remained lymphopenic at 3 years post-transplant. There was no association between duration of lymphopenia and graft survival, rejection, DSA detection, or viremia. CONCLUSIONS A two-dose alemtuzumab induction protocol can have excellent outcomes with a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression regimen. More comprehensive, multicenter, comparative studies of pediatric kidney transplant are needed to improve long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel M Engen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sharon M Bartosh
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Karaterzi S, Tönshoff B, Ahlenstiel-Grunow T, Baghai M, Beck B, Büscher A, Eifler L, Giese T, Lezius S, Müller C, Oh J, Zapf A, Weber LT, Pape L. A multi-center interventional study to assess pharmacokinetics, effectiveness, and tolerability of prolonged-release tacrolimus after pediatric kidney transplantation: study protocol for a prospective, open-label, randomized, two-phase, two-sequence, single dose, crossover, phase III b trial. FRONTIERS IN NEPHROLOGY 2024; 4:1331510. [PMID: 38444519 PMCID: PMC10912931 DOI: 10.3389/fneph.2024.1331510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Background Tacrolimus, a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), is currently the first-line immunosuppressive agent in kidney transplantation. The therapeutic index of tacrolimus is narrow due to due to the substantial impact of minor variations in drug concentration or exposure on clinical outcomes (i.e., nephrotoxicity), and it has a highly variable intra- and inter-individual bioavailability. Non-adherence to immunosuppressants is associated with rejection after kidney transplantation, which is the main cause of long-term graft loss. Once-daily formulations have been shown to significantly improve adherence compared to twice-daily dosing. Envarsus®, the once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus, offers the same therapeutic efficacy as the conventional twice-daily immediate-release tacrolimus formulation (Prograf®) with improved bioavailability, a more consistent pharmacokinetic profile, and a reduced peak to trough, which may reduce CNI-related toxicity. Envarsus® has been approved as an immunosuppressive therapy in adults following kidney or liver transplantation but has not yet been approved in children. The objective of this study is to evaluate the pharmacokinetic profile, efficacy, and tolerability of Envarsus® in children and adolescents aged ≥ 8 and ≤ 18 years to assess its potential role as an additional option for immunosuppressive therapy in children after kidney transplantation. Methods/design The study is designed as a randomized, prospective crossover trial. Each patient undergoes two treatment sequences: sequence 1 includes 4 weeks of Envarsus® and sequence 2 includes 4 weeks of Prograf®. Patients are randomized to either group A (sequence 1, followed by sequence 2) or group B (sequence 2, followed by sequence 1). The primary objective is to assess equivalency between total exposure (of tacrolimus area under the curve concentration (AUC0-24)), immediate-release tacrolimus (Prograf®) therapy, and prolonged-release tacrolimus (Envarsus®) using a daily dose conversion factor of 0.7 for prolonged- versus immediate-release tacrolimus. Secondary objectives are the assessment of pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, adherence, gut microbiome analyses, adverse events (including tacrolimus toxicity and biopsy-proven rejections), biopsy-proven rejections, difference in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and occurrence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs). Discussion This study will test the hypothesis that once-daily prolonged-release tacrolimus (Envarsus®) is bioequivalent to twice-daily intermediate-release tacrolimus after pediatric kidney transplantation and may reduce toxicity and facilitate medication adherence. This novel concept may optimize immunosuppressive therapy for more stable graft function and increased graft survival by avoiding T-cell mediated and/or antibody-mediated rejection due to improved adherence. In addition, the study will provide data on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of prolonged-release tacrolimus in children and adolescents. Clinical Trial Registration EUDRA-CT 2019-003710-13 and ClinicalTrial.gov, identifier NCT06057545.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinem Karaterzi
- Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Maral Baghai
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children’s Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Structural and Computational Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Bodo Beck
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Büscher
- Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lisa Eifler
- Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital, Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Giese
- Department of Immunology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Susanne Lezius
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Müller
- Pharmacology at the Laboratory Diagnostics Centre, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jun Oh
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology and Gastroenterology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Antonia Zapf
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lutz T. Weber
- Children’s and Adolescents’ Hospital, Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lars Pape
- Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ratviset P, Panombualert S, Chathum K, Wisanuyotin S. Outcomes of pediatric deceased donor kidney transplant in northeast Thailand. Pediatr Transplant 2024; 28:e14411. [PMID: 37294688 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation (KT) is the best therapy in children with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), however, improving long-term graft survival remains challenging. The aim of this study was to determine graft survival and potential risk factors in pediatric patients who undergo deceased donor KT with a steroid-based regimen. METHODS The medical records of children who underwent their first deceased donor KT in Srinagarind Hospital (Khon Kaen, Thailand) between 2001 and 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS Seventy-two patients were studied. Male adolescents were the predominant recipients and the majority of donors were young adult males. Non-glomerular disease, particularly hypoplastic/dysplastic kidney disease, was the major cause of ESRD (48.61%). The mean cold ischemic time (CIT) was 18.29 ± 5.29 h. Most of the recipients had more than 4 human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatched loci with positive HLA-DR mismatch (52.78%). Induction therapy was administered in 76.74% of recipients. Tacrolimus plus mycophenolate sodium and prednisolone was the most common immunosuppressive maintenance regimen (69.44%). Graft failure occurred in 18 patients, mostly due to graft rejection (50%). Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after KT were 94.40%, 86.25%, and 74.92%, respectively. The only significant risk factor of graft failure in this study was delayed graft function (DGF) (adjusted HR = 3.55; 95%CI: 1.14, 11.12; p = .029). Patient survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 100%, 98.48%, and 96.19%, respectively. CONCLUSION The short-term outcomes of pediatric KT from deceased donors were satisfactory; however, prevention of DGF would result in better outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeyapat Ratviset
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Sunee Panombualert
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Kannika Chathum
- Outpatient Department, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Suwannee Wisanuyotin
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Duneton C, Hogan J. [From the first kidney transplants to the current pediatric kidney transplant]. Med Sci (Paris) 2023; 39:281-286. [PMID: 36943126 DOI: 10.1051/medsci/2023035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal failure in children but remains a rare procedure with only 100 to 120 pediatric kidney transplants per year in France. Although the main principles of kidney transplantation are the same in children and adults, some specificities regarding underlying kidney diseases, surgical technique, immunosuppressive drugs metabolism and the risk of infectious complications require a specific expertise to care for these patients. Similarly, the major morbidity of dialysis in children and the need for repeated transplants during the patient's life justify pediatric specificities in the choice of donors and the allocation of grafts in most kidney allocation systems worldwide. The objectives of this review are to present the history and specificities of pediatric kidney transplantation, to describe the current activity in France and to discuss future developments while emphasizing the need for basic and clinical research focused on the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Duneton
- Service de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation rénale pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France - Université Paris Cité, Inserm U976, Paris, France
| | - Julien Hogan
- Service de néphrologie, dialyse et transplantation rénale pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré, AP-HP, Paris, France - Université Paris Cité, Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Inserm UMR-S970, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Truchis C, Bouazza N, Foissac F, Charbit M, Dehoux L, Lui G, Ribot M, Briand N, Zheng Y, Tréluyer JM, Boyer O. Prednisolone pharmacokinetics after oral prednisone administration in paediatric patients with kidney transplant. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 89:1532-1540. [PMID: 36510685 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Glucocorticoids are 1 of the primary treatments in paediatric kidney transplantation. The aims of this study were: (i) to build a population pharmacokinetics (PPK) model of free prednisolone, which is the active form of prednisone, in paediatric kidney transplant recipients; (ii) to identify covariates accounting for interindividual variability (IIV) of pharmacokinetics (PK) parameters; and (iii) to investigate drug exposure-safety relationships. METHODS Ninety-seven samples were obtained from 39 paediatric kidney transplant recipients (aged 3.4-17.2 years) in order to investigate prednisone PPK. We selected children receiving oral prednisone as part of their immunosuppressive regimen. A PPK analysis was performed using Monolix. RESULTS A 1-compartment model best described prednisolone concentrations. Large IIV was observed as prednisolone was undetectable at H12 in some patients but could still be detected at H24 in others. Both bodyweight and ciclosporin cotreatment influenced the PK. The clearance (CLU ) and volume of distribution of free prednisolone allometrically scaled to 70 kg were 27.6 L/h and 101 L. Ciclosporin cotreatment decreased CLU by 67%. High blood pressure and new onset diabetes after transplantation were associated with daily free prednisolone exposure. CONCLUSION This study is the first analysis of prednisolone PPK in kidney-transplanted children. Some of the IIV in the PK parameters was explained by bodyweight and ciclosporin cotreatment. These data suggest that dose adjustment is required after identifying variability factors to optimize efficacy and limit side effects. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring in kidney-transplanted children may be useful, especially with respect to safety issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camille de Truchis
- Service de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CRMR MARHEA, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Naïm Bouazza
- EA 7323, Université Paris Cité, Pharmacologie et évaluations thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique, Université de Paris Necker/Cochin, Hôpital Tarnier, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | - Frantz Foissac
- EA 7323, Université Paris Cité, Pharmacologie et évaluations thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique, Université de Paris Necker/Cochin, Hôpital Tarnier, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France
| | - Marina Charbit
- Service de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CRMR MARHEA, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Laurène Dehoux
- Service de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CRMR MARHEA, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Gabrielle Lui
- EA 7323, Université Paris Cité, Pharmacologie et évaluations thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France.,Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, Paris, France
| | - Mégane Ribot
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Université de Paris Necker/Cochin, Hôpital Tarnier, Paris, France.,Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, Paris, France
| | - Nelly Briand
- Unité de Recherche Clinique, Université de Paris Necker/Cochin, Hôpital Tarnier, Paris, France
| | - Yi Zheng
- EA 7323, Université Paris Cité, Pharmacologie et évaluations thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, Paris, France.,Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Marc Tréluyer
- EA 7323, Université Paris Cité, Pharmacologie et évaluations thérapeutiques chez l'enfant et la femme enceinte, Paris, France.,Unité de Recherche Clinique, Université de Paris Necker/Cochin, Hôpital Tarnier, Paris, France.,CIC-1419 Inserm, Cochin-Necker, Paris, France.,Service de Pharmacologie Clinique, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Groupe Hospitalier Paris Centre, Paris, France
| | - Olivia Boyer
- Service de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CRMR MARHEA, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France.,Unité INSERM U1163, Institut Imagine, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patry C, Cordts S, Baumann L, Höcker B, Fichtner A, Ries M, Tönshoff B. Publication rate and research topics of studies in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14262. [PMID: 35253962 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Revised: 01/22/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The quality of medical care for pediatric kidney transplant recipients depends on sound evidence from published clinical trials. METHODS We examined the publication rate, time to publication, and factors associated with publication of studies in pediatric kidney transplantation registered on ClinicalTrials.gov from 1999 to 2020. RESULTS We identified 136 studies with an overall enrollment of 36255 study participants, of which only 58.8% have been published yet. Unpublished studies included data from 14 350 participants. The median time to publication was 25 months (range, 0-117) with a significantly shorter time to publication in more recent years. The most frequently investigated research topic was immunosuppressants (49.3%), followed by perioperative management (11.0%) and infectiology (10.3%). The percentage of published studies was highest for the topic steroid withdrawal (87.5%), followed by infectiology (78.6%), and nutrition, sports and quality of life (71.4%). Studies, which were co-funded by industry, showed a significantly higher 5-year publication rate (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, nearly half of all studies in pediatric kidney transplantation remain unpublished. Non-publication of studies might lead to a publication bias with a negative impact on clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Patry
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Cordts
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Baumann
- Institute of Medical Biometry, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Britta Höcker
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Fichtner
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Ries
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Burkhard Tönshoff
- Department of Pediatrics I, University Children's Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kizilbash SJ, Jensen CJ, Kouri AM, Balani SS, Chavers B. Steroid avoidance/withdrawal and maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplantation. Pediatr Transplant 2022; 26:e14189. [PMID: 34786800 DOI: 10.1111/petr.14189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2021] [Revised: 09/30/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Corticosteroids have been an integral part of maintenance immunosuppression for pediatric kidney transplantation. However, prolonged steroid therapy is associated with significant toxicities resulting in several SW/avoidance strategies in recent years. METHOD/OBJECTIVE This comprehensive review aims to discuss steroid-related toxicities and the safety, efficacy, and benefit of steroid avoidance/withdrawal immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. RESULTS Initial studies of SW/avoidance conducted in the setting of CSA and AZA showed an increased incidence of AR but no increase in graft loss or mortality with SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression. Studies performed under modern immunosuppression (induction therapy, Tac, and MMF) show no significant increase in AR or graft loss with SW/avoidance immunosuppression. Furthermore, SW/avoidance immunosuppression is associated with significant improvement in growth, BMI, BP control, and lipid profile in pediatric kidney transplant recipients. Despite these data, SW/avoidance remains controversial, and only 40% of pediatric kidney transplant recipients in the United States are currently on SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression. CONCLUSION SW/avoidance maintenance immunosuppression is safe and associated with fewer side effects compared with steroid-inclusive maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Kizilbash
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Chelsey J Jensen
- Solid Organ Transplant, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anne M Kouri
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shanthi S Balani
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Blanche Chavers
- Pediatric Nephrology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dashti-Khavidaki S, Saidi R, Lu H. Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation. World J Transplant 2021; 11:443-465. [PMID: 34868896 PMCID: PMC8603633 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i11.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simin Dashti-Khavidaki
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14155, Iran
| | - Reza Saidi
- Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahlenstiel-Grunow T, Liu X, Schild R, Oh J, Taylan C, Weber LT, Staude H, Verboom M, Schröder C, Sabau R, Großhennig A, Pape L. Steering Transplant Immunosuppression by Measuring Virus-Specific T Cell Levels: The Randomized, Controlled IVIST Trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2021; 32:502-516. [PMID: 33323473 PMCID: PMC8054884 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2020050645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacokinetic monitoring is insufficient to estimate the intensity of immunosuppression after transplantation. Virus-specific T cells correlate with both virus-specific and general cellular immune defense. Additional steering of immunosuppressive therapy by virus-specific T cell levels might optimize dosing of immunosuppressants. METHODS In a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial, we randomized 64 pediatric kidney recipients to a control group with trough-level monitoring of immunosuppressants or to an intervention group with additional steering of immunosuppressive therapy by levels of virus-specific T cells (quantified by cytokine flow cytometry). Both groups received immunosuppression with cyclosporin A and everolimus in the same target range of trough levels. Primary end point was eGFR 2 years after transplantation. RESULTS In the primary analysis, we detected no difference in eGFR for the intervention and control groups 2 years after transplantation, although baseline eGFR 1 month after transplantation was lower in the intervention group versus the control group. Compared with controls, patients in the intervention group received significantly lower daily doses of everolimus and nonsignificantly lower doses of cyclosporin A, resulting in significantly lower trough levels of everolimus (3.5 versus 4.5 µg/L, P<0.001) and cyclosporin A (47.4 versus 64.1 µg/L, P<0.001). Only 20% of patients in the intervention group versus 47% in the control group received glucocorticoids 2 years after transplantation (P=0.04). The groups had similar numbers of donor-specific antibodies and serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Steering immunosuppressive therapy by virus-specific T cell levels in addition to pharmacokinetic monitoring seems safe, results in a similar eGFR, and personalizes immunosuppressive therapy by lowering exposure to immunosuppressive drugs, likely resulting in lower drug costs. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER IVIST trial, https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2009-012436-32 and ISRCTN89806912.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thurid Ahlenstiel-Grunow
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Xiaofei Liu
- Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Raphael Schild
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jun Oh
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christina Taylan
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Children’s and Adolescents’ University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lutz T. Weber
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Children’s and Adolescents’ University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hagen Staude
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children’s Hospital, University Hospital of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Murielle Verboom
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Engineering, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Christoph Schröder
- Department of Pharmacovigilance, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ruxandra Sabau
- Department of Pharmacovigilance, Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anika Großhennig
- Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lars Pape
- Department of Pediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- Department of Pediatrics II, University Hospital of Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chambers ET. Role of low-dose calcineurin inhibitor regimens in pediatric kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:11-12. [PMID: 32580235 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Eileen Tsai Chambers
- Pediatrics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.,Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|