1
|
Fragkou PC, Dimopoulou D, Moschopoulos CD, Skevaki C. Effects of long-term corticosteroid use on susceptibility to respiratory viruses: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect 2025; 31:43-48. [PMID: 39332599 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2024.09.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2024] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Synthetic glucocorticoids are among the most commonly administered drugs due to their potent immunomodulatory properties. However, they may put patients at risk for infections. Their effect on the incidence of respiratory viral infections (RVIs) remains unclear. OBJECTIVES The aim of this review is to provide an insightful overview of the most up-to-date evidence regarding the extent to which the use of corticosteroids (CSs) influences the risk of RVIs. SOURCES The PubMed database was searched for studies on the association between CSs and RVIs from inception until 15 December 2023. CONTENT CSs have differing impacts on the risk of RVIs in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, influenced by both the specific virus and the type and dose of CSs. Furthermore, current data demonstrate that CSs may increase the risk of RVIs in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, vasculitis, solid tumours, haematological malignancies, and among transplant recipients. IMPLICATIONS Large-scale studies are imperative to inform a more accurate and personalized risk stratification for RVIs. This, in turn, will point towards new strategies for RVI prevention and associated morbidity and mortality in high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi C Fragkou
- First Department of Critical Care Medicine and Pulmonary Services, Evangelismos General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV), Basel, Switzerland
| | - Dimitra Dimopoulou
- Second Department of Pediatrics, "Aghia Sophia" Children's Hospital, Athens, Greece; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV), Basel, Switzerland
| | - Charalampos D Moschopoulos
- Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV), Basel, Switzerland
| | - Chrysanthi Skevaki
- Institute of Laboratory Medicine, Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (UGMLC), Philipps University Marburg, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg, Germany; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for Respiratory Viruses (ESGREV), Basel, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Landstra CP, Ruissen MM, Regeer H, Nijhoff MF, Ballieux BEPB, van der Boog PJM, de Vries APJ, Huisman SD, de Koning EJP. Impact of a Public Health Emergency on Behavior, Stress, Anxiety and Glycemic Control in Patients With Pancreas or Islet Transplantation for Type 1 Diabetes. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12278. [PMID: 38601276 PMCID: PMC11005033 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
A public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic has behavioral, mental and physical implications in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). To what extent the presence of a transplant further increases this burden is not known. Therefore, we compared T1D patients with an islet or pancreas transplant (β-cell Tx; n = 51) to control T1D patients (n = 272). Fear of coronavirus infection was higher in those with β-cell Tx than without (Visual Analogue Scale 5.0 (3.0-7.0) vs. 3.0 (2.0-5.0), p = 0.004) and social isolation behavior was more stringent (45.8% vs. 14.0% reported not leaving the house, p < 0.001). A previous β-cell Tx was the most important predictor of at-home isolation. Glycemic control worsened in patients with β-cell Tx, but improved in control patients (ΔHbA1c +1.67 ± 8.74 vs. -1.72 ± 6.15 mmol/mol, p = 0.006; ΔTime-In-Range during continuous glucose monitoring -4.5% (-6.0%-1.5%) vs. +3.0% (-2.0%-6.0%), p = 0.038). Fewer patients with β-cell Tx reported easier glycemic control during lockdown (10.4% vs. 22.6%, p = 0.015). All T1D patients, regardless of transplantation status, experienced stress (33.4%), anxiety (27.9%), decreased physical activity (42.0%), weight gain (40.5%), and increased insulin requirements (29.7%). In conclusion, T1D patients with β-cell Tx are increasingly affected by a viral pandemic lockdown with higher fear of infection, more stringent social isolation behavior and deterioration of glycemic control. This trial has been registered in the clinicaltrials.gov registry under identifying number NCT05977205 (URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05977205).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cyril P. Landstra
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Merel M. Ruissen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Section Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hannah Regeer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Michiel F. Nijhoff
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Bart E. P. B. Ballieux
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Paul J. M. van der Boog
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Aiko P. J. de Vries
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sasja D. Huisman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Eelco J. P. de Koning
- Department of Internal Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Transplantation Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
He M, Wang Y, Li S, Gillespie A. Nationwide in-hospital mortality and morbidity analysis of COVID-19 in advanced chronic kidney disease, dialysis and kidney transplant recipients. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1250631. [PMID: 38020145 PMCID: PMC10652751 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1250631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and kidney transplants (KT) are at an elevated risk for COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and mortality. A comprehensive comparison of morbidity and mortality between these populations with kidney disease and individuals without any kidney disease is lacking. Methods We analysed the 2020 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database for non-elective adult COVID-19 hospitalizations, categorizing patients into advanced CKD, ESKD, KT, and kidney disease-free cohorts. Our analysis included a description of the distribution of comorbidities across the entire spectrum of CKD, ESKD, and KT. Additionally, we investigated in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization, adjusting for potential confounders through multivariable regression models. Results The study included 1,018,915 adults hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2020. The incidence of advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT in this cohort was 5.8%, 3.8%, and 0.4%, respectively. Patients with advanced CKD, ESKD, and KT exhibited higher multimorbidity burdens, with 90.3%, 91.0%, and 75.2% of patients in each group having a Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) equal to or greater than 3. The all-cause in-hospital mortality ranged from 9.3% in kidney disease-free patients to 20.6% in advanced CKD, 19.4% in ESKD, and 12.4% in KT patients. After adjusting for potential confounders at both the patient and hospital levels, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were found to be associated with increased odds of mortality, with adjusted odds ratios (aOR) of 1.34, 1.80, 2.66, 1.97, and 1.69, respectively. Conclusion Patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with advanced CKD, ESKD, or KT demonstrated a higher burden of comorbidities and increased mortality rates compared to those without kidney disease. After adjusting for confounders, CKD stages 3-5; ESKD; and KT were identified as independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality, illustrating a dose-response relationship between the odds of mortality and adverse outcomes as CKD progressed from stages 3 to 5. Our study highlights the necessity for enhanced management of comorbidities, targeted interventions, and vigorous vaccination efforts to mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes in the vulnerable populations of patients with CKD, ESKD, and KT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mingyue He
- Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Yichen Wang
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Si Li
- Department of Internal Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Avrum Gillespie
- Section of Nephrology, Hypertension and Kidney Transplantation, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gleeson S, Martin P, Thomson T, Spensley KJ, Goodall D, Bedi R, Thind AK, Seneschall C, Gan J, McAdoo S, Lightstone L, Kelleher P, Prendecki M, Willicombe M. Lack of seroresponse to SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines given early post-transplant in patients primed pre-transplantation. Front Immunol 2023; 13:1083167. [PMID: 36726970 PMCID: PMC9885043 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1083167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are recommended pre-transplantation, however, waning immunity and evolving variants mandate booster doses. Currently there no data to inform the optimal timing of booster doses post-transplant, in patients primed pre-transplant. We investigated serial serological samples in 204 transplant recipients who received 2 or 3 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines pre-transplant. Spike protein antibody concentrations, [anti-S], were measured on the day of transplantation and following booster doses post-transplant. In infection-naïve patients, post-booster [anti-S] did not change when V3 (1st booster) was given at 116(78-150) days post-transplant, falling from 122(32-574) to 111(34-682) BAU/ml, p=0.78. Similarly, in infection-experienced patients, [anti-S] on Day-0 and post-V3 were 1090(133-3667) and 2207(650-5618) BAU/ml respectively, p=0.26. In patients remaining infection-naïve, [anti-S] increased post-V4 (as 2nd booster) when given at 226(208-295) days post-transplant, rising from 97(34-1074) to 5134(229-5680) BAU/ml, p=0.0016. Whilst in patients who had 3 vaccines pre-transplant, who received V4 (as 1st booster) at 82(49-101) days post-transplant, [anti-S] did not change, falling from 981(396-2666) to 871(242-2092) BAU/ml, p=0.62. Overall, infection pre-transplant and [anti-S] at the time of transplantation predicted post-transplant infection risk. As [Anti-S] fail to respond to SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccines given early post-transplant, passive immunity may be beneficial to protect patients during this period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gleeson
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Martin
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tina Thomson
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katrina J. Spensley
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dawn Goodall
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rachna Bedi
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amarpreet Kaur Thind
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Charlotte Seneschall
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jaslyn Gan
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen McAdoo
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Liz Lightstone
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Kelleher
- Department of Infection and Immunity Sciences Northwest London Pathology NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, United Kingdom,Department of Infectious Diseases, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maria Prendecki
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle Willicombe
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom,Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare National Healthcare Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom,*Correspondence: Michelle Willicombe,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Berger B, Hazzan M, Kamar N, Francois H, Matignon M, Greze C, Gatault P, Frimat L, Westeel PF, Goutaudier V, Snanoudj R, Colosio C, Sicard A, Bertrand D, Mousson C, Bamoulid J, Thierry A, Anglicheau D, Couzi L, Chemouny JM, Duveau A, Moal V, Le Meur Y, Blancho G, Tourret J, Malvezzi P, Mariat C, Rerolle JP, Bouvier N, Caillard S, Thaunat O, the French Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) COVID Registry 34. Absence of Mortality Differences Between the First and Second COVID-19 Waves in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Kidney Int Rep 2022; 7:2617-2629. [PMID: 36159445 PMCID: PMC9489985 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction SARS-CoV-2 pandemic evolved in 2 consecutive waves during 2020. Improvements in the management of COVID-19 led to a reduction in mortality rates among hospitalized patients during the second wave. Whether this progress benefited kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), a population particularly vulnerable to severe COVID-19, remained unclear. Methods In France, 957 KTRs were hospitalized for COVID-19 in 2020 and their data were prospectively collected into the French Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) COVID registry. The presentation, management, and outcomes of the 359 KTRs diagnosed during the first wave were compared to those of the 598 of the second wave. Results Baseline comorbidities were similar between KTRs of the 2 waves. Maintenance immunosuppression was reduced in most patients but withdrawal of antimetabolite (73.7% vs. 58.4%, P < 0.001) or calcineurin inhibitor (32.1% vs. 16.6%, P < 0.001) was less frequent during the second wave. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin that were commonly used during the first wave (21.7% and 30.9%, respectively) but were almost abandoned during the second wave. In contrast, the use of high dose corticosteroids doubled (19.5% vs. 41.6%, P < 0.001). Despite these changing trends in COVID-19 management, 60-day mortality was not statistically different between the 2 waves (25.3% vs. 23.9%; Log Rank, P = 0.48) and COVID-19 hospitalization period was not associated with death due to COVID-19 in multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.67-1.17, P = 0.4). Conclusion We conclude that changing of therapeutic trends during 2020 did not reduce COVID-19 related mortality among KTRs. Our data indirectly support the importance of vaccination and neutralizing monoclonal anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to protect KTRS from severe COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastien Berger
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Hazzan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Lille, Lille, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Hélène Francois
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Marie Matignon
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation IFRNT, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire, Virus-Immunité-Cancer, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Equipe 21, INSERM U 955, Créteil, France
| | - Clarisse Greze
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Philippe Gatault
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Luc Frimat
- Department of Nephrology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Vandoeuvre, France, INSERM CIC-EC CIE6, Nancy, France
| | - Pierre F. Westeel
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Amiens, Amiens, France
| | - Valentin Goutaudier
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Renaud Snanoudj
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hôpital Foch, Paris, France
| | - Charlotte Colosio
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Reims, Reims, France
| | - Antoine Sicard
- Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Dominique Bertrand
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Christiane Mousson
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Dijon, Dijon, France
| | - Jamal Bamoulid
- Department of Nephrology, University of Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Antoine Thierry
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Dany Anglicheau
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adultes, Hôpital Universitaire Necker- APHP Centre-Université de Paris INEM INSERM U 1151 - CNRS UMR 8253, Paris, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse-Aphérèse, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux Pellegrin, Unité Mixte de Recherche “ImmunoConcEpT” 5164 - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jonathan M. Chemouny
- University of Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, CIC-P 1414, Rennes, France
| | - Agnes Duveau
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Angers, Angers, France
| | - Valerie Moal
- Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Aix Marseille Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille, Hôpital Conception, Marseille, France
| | - Yannick Le Meur
- Department of Nephrology, CHU de Brest, UMR1227, Lymphocytes B et Autoimmunité, Université de Brest, Inserm, Labex IGO, Brest, France
| | - Gilles Blancho
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jérôme Tourret
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Department of Nephrology, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Christophe Mariat
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of St Etienne, St Etienne, France
| | - Jean-Philippe Rerolle
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Nicolas Bouvier
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Caen, Caen, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM, IRM UMR-S 1109, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
- Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Villeurbanne, France
| | - the French Solid Organ Transplant (SOT) COVID Registry34
- Department of Transplantation, Nephrology and Clinical Immunology, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Lille, Lille, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Francilien de Recherche en Néphrologie et Transplantation IFRNT, Groupe Hospitalier Henri-Mondor/Albert-Chenevier, Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Département Hospitalo-Universitaire, Virus-Immunité-Cancer, Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale, Equipe 21, INSERM U 955, Créteil, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Tours, Tours, France
- Department of Nephrology, University of Lorraine, CHRU-Nancy, Vandoeuvre, France, INSERM CIC-EC CIE6, Nancy, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Amiens, Amiens, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Hôpital Foch, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Reims, Reims, France
- Service de Néphrologie-Dialyse-Transplantation, Hôpital Pasteur 2, CHU de Nice, Unité de Recherche Clinique Côte d'Azur, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Rouen, Rouen, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Dijon, Dijon, France
- Department of Nephrology, University of Besançon, Besançon, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation Adultes, Hôpital Universitaire Necker- APHP Centre-Université de Paris INEM INSERM U 1151 - CNRS UMR 8253, Paris, France
- Service de Néphrologie-Transplantation-Dialyse-Aphérèse, Hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux Pellegrin, Unité Mixte de Recherche “ImmunoConcEpT” 5164 - Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- University of Rennes, CHU Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail) - UMR_S 1085, CIC-P 1414, Rennes, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Angers, Angers, France
- Centre de Néphrologie et Transplantation Rénale, Aix Marseille Université, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille, Hôpital Conception, Marseille, France
- Department of Nephrology, CHU de Brest, UMR1227, Lymphocytes B et Autoimmunité, Université de Brest, Inserm, Labex IGO, Brest, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
- Nephrology and Renal Transplantation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de la Pitié Salpétrière, Paris, France
- Department of Nephrology, University of Grenoble, Grenoble, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of St Etienne, St Etienne, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, University of Caen, Caen, France
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM, IRM UMR-S 1109, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- CIRI, INSERM U1111, University Claude Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
- Claude Bernard University (Lyon 1), Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Association Between Maintenance Immunosuppressive Regimens and COVID-19 Mortality in Kidney Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2022; 106:2063-2067. [PMID: 35883236 PMCID: PMC9521383 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Solid organ transplant recipients are at high risk for fatal forms of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We conducted a cohort study among kidney transplant (KT) recipients from the French Solid Organ Transplant COVID-19 Registry to investigate the association between maintenance immunosuppressive drugs and 60-d mortality. METHODS Data from all KT recipients with COVID-19 included in the French Solid Organ Transplant COVID-19 Registry between February 28, 2020, and December 30, 2020, were retrieved. We evaluated associations between immunosuppressive drugs and death within 60 d using logistic regression, with all baseline characteristics considered to influence outcome or immunosuppressive regimen. The Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used for controlling false positive rate; 40 multiple imputations were performed. Adjusted P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were 1451 KT recipients included. Median age was 58 y, and 66.4% were men. Most frequent comorbidities were hypertension (81.9%), diabetes (34.5%), and cardiovascular disease (29.5%). Median time since transplant was 71 mo. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens included calcineurin inhibitors (1295, 89.2%), antimetabolites (1205, 83%), corticosteroids (1094, 75.4%), mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (144, 9.9%), and belatacept (58, 4.0%). Among 1451 transplant recipients, 201 (13.9%) died within 60 d. Older age and higher baseline serum creatinine were associated with mortality (odds ratios, 1.09 [1.07-1.11] and 1.01 [1.005-1.009], P < 0.001). Corticosteroid-free regimens were associated with a significantly lower risk of death (odds ratio, 0.48 [0.31-0.76]; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS Corticosteroid-free regimens were associated with a lower risk of death in KT recipients with COVID-19. Long-term exposure to corticosteroids impairs immune functions and may predispose solid organ transplant recipients to severe forms of COVID-19.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mahalingasivam V, Su G, Iwagami M, Davids MR, Wetmore JB, Nitsch D. COVID-19 and kidney disease: insights from epidemiology to inform clinical practice. Nat Rev Nephrol 2022; 18:485-498. [PMID: 35418695 PMCID: PMC9006492 DOI: 10.1038/s41581-022-00570-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous studies have aimed to address the challenges faced by patients with kidney disease and their caregivers. These studies addressed areas of concern such as the high infection and mortality risk of patients on in-centre haemodialysis and transplant recipients. However, the ability to draw meaningful conclusions from these studies has in some instances been challenging, owing to barriers in aspects of usual care, data limitations and problematic methodological practices. In many settings, access to SARS-CoV-2 testing differed substantially between patient groups, whereas the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection varied over time and place because of differences in viral prevalence, targeted public health policies and vaccination rates. The absence of baseline kidney function data posed problems in the classification of chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury in some studies, potentially compromising the generalizability of findings. Study findings also require attentive appraisal in terms of the effects of confounding, collider bias and chance. As this pandemic continues and in the future, the implementation of sustainable and integrated research infrastructure is needed in settings across the world to minimize infection transmission and both prevent and plan for the short-term and long-term complications of infectious diseases. Registries can support the real-world evaluation of vaccines and therapies in patients with advanced kidney disease while enabling monitoring of rare complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viyaasan Mahalingasivam
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Guobin Su
- Department of Nephrology, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital, The Second Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, State Key Laboratory of Organ Failure Research, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Kidney Disease, Department of Nephrology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Masao Iwagami
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mogamat Razeen Davids
- Division of Nephrology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa
- South African Renal Registry, Cape Town, South Africa
- African Renal Registry, African Association of Nephrology, Durban, South Africa
| | - James B Wetmore
- Division of Nephrology, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare, Minneapolis, USA
| | - Dorothea Nitsch
- Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
- UK Renal Registry, Bristol, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chow KM, Maggiore U, Dor FJ. Ethical Issues in Kidney Transplant and Donation During COVID-19 Pandemic. Semin Nephrol 2022; 42:151272. [PMID: 36577645 PMCID: PMC9283694 DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2022.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The coronavirus disease-19 pandemic caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus has faced the transplant community with unprecedented clinical challenges in a highly vulnerable patient category. These were associated with many uncertainties for patients and health care professionals and prompted many ethical debates regarding the safe delivery of kidney transplantation. In this article, we highlight some of the most important ethical questions that were raised during the pandemic and attempt to analyze ethical arguments in light of core principles of medical ethics to either suspend or continue kidney transplantation, and to mandate vaccination in transplant patients, transplant candidates, and, finally, health care providers. We have come up with frameworks to deal responsibly with these ethical challenges, and formulated recommendations to cope with the issues imposed on patients and transplant professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai-Ming Chow
- Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
| | - Umberto Maggiore
- Dipartimento di Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Parma, Unita’ Operativa Nefrologia, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Frank J.M.F. Dor
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom,Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom,Address reprint requests to Frank J.M.F. Dor, MD, PhD, FEBS(Hon), FRCS, Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Office 468, Hammersmith House, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, W120HS London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prasad N, Bansal SB, Yadav B, Manhas N, Yadav D, Gautam S, Kushwaha R, Singh A, Bhadauria D, Yachha M, Behera MR, Kaul A. Seroconversion Rate After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Two Doses of Either ChAdOx1-nCOV COVISHIELD™ or BBV-152 COVAXIN™ Vaccination in Renal Allograft Recipients: An Experience of Two Public and Private Tertiary Care Center. Front Immunol 2022; 13:911738. [PMID: 35844596 PMCID: PMC9280041 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.911738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Vaccination is an effective strategy for preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated mortality. Renal Transplant Recipients (RTRs) are vulnerable to acquiring infection and high mortality due to their immunocompromised state. Varying responses to the different vaccines, depending on types of vaccines and population, have been reported. Vaccines supply is also limited. The current study evaluated the seroconversion rate after SARS-CoV-2 infection and 2 doses of either COVAXIN™ or COVISHIELD™ vaccination in RTR. Methods The serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein neutralizing antibody titer was measured in 370 RTRs who acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection (n=172), yet not vaccinated; and those vaccinated with COVAXIN™ (n=78), and COVISHIELD™ (n=120) by chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassay methods from serum. Result Overall, the seroconversion rate either after vaccination or infection was 85.13% (315/370). The vaccine-associated seroconversion was 80.30% (159/198). SARS-CoV-2 infection-associated seroconversion was 90.69% (156/172), COVISHIELD™ associated seroconversion was 79.2% (95/120), and COVAXIN™ associated seroconversion was 82.05% (64/78). The median IgG titer in the SARS-CoV-2 infection group was 646.50 AU/ml (IQR: 232.52-1717.42), in the COVAXIN™ group was 1449.75 AU/ml (IQR: 400.0-3068.55), and the COVISHIELD™ vaccination group was 1500.51 AU/ml (IQR: 379.47-4938.50). The seroconversion rate and antibody titers were similar irrespective of the place of sampling. Patient’s age-associated seroconversion in <45 years was 88.01% (213/242), 45.1-60 years was 83.18% (94/113), and > 60 years was 58.3% (7/12). Conclusions Both infection and vaccination induce robust antibody formation in RTRs. The seroconversion rate after SARS-CoV-2 infection was higher but with a lower antibody titer than vaccines. The vaccines, COVAXIN™ and COVISHIELD™, induce more elevated antibody titers than natural infection. The seroconversion rate and antibody titer in Indian RTRs appears to be better than in the western population, irrespective of their vaccination status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narayan Prasad
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
- *Correspondence: Narayan Prasad,
| | | | - Brijesh Yadav
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Neha Manhas
- Medanta The Medicity Hospital, Gurgaon, India
| | - Deependra Yadav
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Sonam Gautam
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ravishankar Kushwaha
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ankita Singh
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Dharmendra Bhadauria
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Monika Yachha
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Manas Ranjan Behera
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Anupama Kaul
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schaenman J, Byford H, Grogan T, Motwani Y, Beaird OE, Kamath M, Lum E, Meneses K, Sayah D, Vucicevic D, Saab S. Impact of solid organ transplant status on outcomes of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 infection. Transpl Infect Dis 2022; 24:e13853. [PMID: 35579437 PMCID: PMC9347588 DOI: 10.1111/tid.13853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Revised: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Background The COVID‐19 pandemic has caused significant morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. However, it remains unclear whether the risk factor for SOT patients is the immunosuppression inherent to transplantation versus patient comorbidities. Methods We reviewed outcomes in a cohort of SOT (n = 129) and non‐SOT (NSOT) patients (n = 708) admitted to the University of California, Los Angeles for COVID‐19 infection. Data analyses utilized multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the impact of patient demographics, comorbidities, and transplant status on outcomes. SOT patients were analyzed by kidney SOT (KSOT) versus nonkidney SOT (NKSOT) groups. Results SOT and NSOT patients with COVID‐19 infection differed in terms of patient age, ethnicity, and comorbidities. NKSOT patients were the most likely to experience death, with a mortality rate of 16.2% compared with 1.8% for KSOT and 8.3% for NSOT patients (p = .013). Multivariable analysis of hospitalized patients revealed that patient age (odds ratio [OR] 2.79, p = .001) and neurologic condition (OR 2.66, p < .001) were significantly associated with mortality. Analysis of ICU patients revealed a 2.98‐fold increased odds of death in NKSOT compared with NSOT patients (p = .013). Conclusions This study demonstrates the importance of transplant status in predicting adverse clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized or admitted to the ICU with COVID‐19, especially for NKSOT patients. Transplant status and comorbidities, including age, could be used to risk stratify patients with COVID‐19. This data suggests that immunosuppression contributes to COVID‐19 disease severity and mortality and may have implications for managing immunosuppression, especially for critically ill patients admitted to the ICU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Schaenman
- Division of Infectious, Diseases, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Hannah Byford
- Transplant Nephrology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Tristan Grogan
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Yash Motwani
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Omer E Beaird
- Division of Infectious, Diseases, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Megan Kamath
- Division of Cardiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Erik Lum
- Transplant Nephrology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Katherine Meneses
- Transplant Hepatology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - David Sayah
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Darko Vucicevic
- Division of Cardiology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| | - Sammy Saab
- Transplant Hepatology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Khatri A, Raja M, Guerra G, Natori Y. True effect of monoclonal antibody for COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:1492-1493. [PMID: 34897967 PMCID: PMC9849506 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Khatri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mohammed Raja
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Giselle Guerra
- Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA,Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Yoichiro Natori
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, Florida, USA,Miami Transplant Institute, Jackson Health System, Miami, Florida, USA,Correspondence Yoichiro Natori, Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Disease, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Dashti-Khavidaki S, Saidi R, Lu H. Current status of glucocorticoid usage in solid organ transplantation. World J Transplant 2021; 11:443-465. [PMID: 34868896 PMCID: PMC8603633 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v11.i11.443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Glucocorticoids (GCs) have been the mainstay of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation (SOT) for decades, due to their potent effects on innate immunity and tissue protective effects. However, some SOT centers are reluctant to administer GCs long-term because of the various related side effects. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of GCs in SOT. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from 2011 to April 2021 using search syntaxes covering “transplantation” and “glucocorticoids”. GCs are used in transplant recipients, transplant donors, and organ perfusate solution to improve transplant outcomes. In SOT recipients, GCs are administered as induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy. GCs are also the cornerstone to treat acute antibody- and T-cell-mediated rejections. Addition of GCs to organ perfusate solution and pretreatment of transplant donors with GCs are recommended by some guidelines and protocols, to reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury peri-transplant. GCs with low bioavailability and high potency for GC receptors, such as budesonide, nanoparticle-mediated targeted delivery of GCs to specific organs, and combination use of dexamethasone with inducers of immune-regulatory cells, are new methods of GC application in SOT patients to reduce side effects or induce immune-tolerance instead of immunosuppression. Various side effects involving different non-targeted organs/tissues, such as bone, cardiovascular, neuromuscular, skin and gastrointestinal tract, have been noted for GCs. There are also potential drug-drug interactions for GCs in SOT patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simin Dashti-Khavidaki
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14155, Iran
| | - Reza Saidi
- Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Pharmacology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen JJ, Kuo G, Lee TH, Yang HY, Wu HH, Tu KH, Tian YC. Incidence of Mortality, Acute Kidney Injury and Graft Loss in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients with Coronavirus Disease 2019: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10215162. [PMID: 34768682 PMCID: PMC8584628 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10215162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The adverse impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on kidney function has been reported since the global pandemic. The burden of COVID-19 on kidney transplant recipients, however, has not been systematically analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis with a random-effect model was conducted to explore the rate of mortality, intensive care unit admission, invasive mechanical ventilation, acute kidney injury, kidney replacement therapy and graft loss in the adult kidney transplant population with COVID-19. Sensitivity analysis, subgroup analysis and meta-regression were also performed. Results: we demonstrated a pooled mortality rate of 21% (95% CI: 19−23%), an intensive care unit admission rate of 26% (95% CI: 22–31%), an invasive ventilation rate among those who required intensive care unit care of 72% (95% CI: 62–81%), an acute kidney injury rate of 44% (95% CI: 39–49%), a kidney replacement therapy rate of 12% (95% CI: 9–15%), and a graft loss rate of 8% (95% CI: 5–15%) in kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19. The meta-regression indicated that advancing age is associated with higher mortality; every increase in age by 10 years was associated with an increased mortality rate of 3.7%. Regional differences in outcome were also detected. Further studies focused on treatments and risk factor identification are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Jin Chen
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
| | - George Kuo
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
| | - Tao Han Lee
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
| | - Huang-Yu Yang
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Hsin Hsu Wu
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Hua Tu
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
| | - Ya-Chung Tian
- Department of Nephrology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Main Branch, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan; (J.-J.C.); (G.K.); (T.H.L.); (H.-Y.Y.); (H.H.W.); (K.-H.T.)
- Department of Nephrology, Kidney Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan City 33305, Taiwan
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Udomkarnjananun S, Kerr SJ, Townamchai N, Susantitaphong P, Tulvatana W, Praditpornsilpa K, Eiam-Ong S, Avihingsanon Y. Mortality risk factors of COVID-19 infection in kidney transplantation recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohorts and clinical registries. Sci Rep 2021; 11:20073. [PMID: 34625642 PMCID: PMC8501014 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99713-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation recipients (KTR) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at higher risk of death than general population. However, mortality risk factors in KTR are still not clearly identified. Our objective was to systematically analyze published evidence for risk factors associated with mortality in COVID-19 KTR. Electronic databases were searched for eligible studies on 1 August 2021. All prospective and retrospective studies of COVID-19 in KTR were considered eligible without language restriction. Since data in case reports and series could potentially be subsets of larger studies, only studies with ≥ 50 patients were included. Random-effects model meta-analysis was used to calculate weighted mean difference (WMD) and pooled odds ratio (OR) of factors associated with mortality. From a total 1,137 articles retrieved, 13 were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,440 KTR. Compared with survivors, non-survivors were significantly older (WMD 10.5 years, 95% CI 9.3-11.8). KTR of deceased donor were at higher risk of death (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.10-2.74). Comorbidities including diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and active cancer significantly increased mortality risk. KTR with dyspnea (OR 5.68, 95% CI 2.11-15.33) and pneumonia (OR 10.64, 95% CI 3.37-33.55) at presentation were at higher mortality risk, while diarrhea decreased the risk (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.47-0.78). Acute kidney injury was associated with mortality (OR 3.24, 95% CI 1.36-7.70). Inflammatory markers were significantly higher in the non-survivors, including C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and interleukine-6. A number of COVID-19 mortality risk factors were identified from KTR patient characteristics, presenting symptoms, and laboratory investigations. KTR with these risk factors should receive more intensive monitoring and early therapeutic interventions to optimize health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suwasin Udomkarnjananun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
- Excellence Center for Solid Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
| | - Stephen J Kerr
- Research Affairs, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natavudh Townamchai
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Excellence Center for Solid Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Paweena Susantitaphong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Wasee Tulvatana
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kearkiat Praditpornsilpa
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Somchai Eiam-Ong
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Yingyos Avihingsanon
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, 1873 Rama IV Road, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
- Renal Immunology and Transplantation Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Excellence Center for Solid Organ Transplantation, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Caillard S, Benotmane I, Meidinger C, Jegou V, Ludwiller S, Rihon A, Desmarquets A, Steinmetz L, Morvan M, Kedjam K, Bigot A, Roy D, Schmitt D, Marx D, Bassand X, Perrin P, Gautier Vargas G, Cognard N, Olagne J, Braun L, Heibel F, Martzloff J, Moulin B, Fafi Kremer S. SARS-Cov-2 Seroprevalence in a French Kidney Transplant Center Located Within a "High-risk" Zone. Transplantation 2021; 105:2165-2169. [PMID: 33756547 PMCID: PMC8487704 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000003766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2020] [Revised: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) seroprevalence in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) remain rare. We sought to shed further light on this issue by conducting a single-center study in a kidney transplant center located in one of the France's highest risk zone (Grand Est) for coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) during the initial disease outbreak. METHODS To this aim, we used a survey approach coupled with systematic investigation of SARS-CoV-2 serology in a cohort of 1390 KTRs. RESULTS SARS-CoV-2 serologies were available for 780 survey respondents, among whom 48 had anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies (total seroprevalence: 6.2%). Thirty-five of the 48 seropositive KTRs had previously received a diagnosis of Covid-19, whereas the remaining 13 patients were not known to be infected (8 asymptomatic cases). Specifically, 18.7% of seropositive KTRs and 1.1% of the entire cohort were asymptomatic. Household exposure was found to markedly increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission. CONCLUSIONS Our findings demonstrate that the overall SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in KTRs living in one of the France's highest risk zone for Covid-19 during the first French lockdown was as low as 6.3%. Rapid and strict implementation of protective measures could have significantly mitigated virus spread even in an area of high virus circulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Caillard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Ilies Benotmane
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM U1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX Strasbourg, France
| | - Céline Meidinger
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Vanessa Jegou
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Sandra Ludwiller
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Anne Rihon
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Audrey Desmarquets
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Lucille Steinmetz
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Murielle Morvan
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Karima Kedjam
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Amandine Bigot
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Danielle Roy
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Dominique Schmitt
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - David Marx
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM U1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX Strasbourg, France
| | - Xavier Bassand
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Peggy Perrin
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- INSERM U1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX Strasbourg, France
| | - Gabriela Gautier Vargas
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Noelle Cognard
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jérome Olagne
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laura Braun
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Francoise Heibel
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jonas Martzloff
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Bruno Moulin
- Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Samira Fafi Kremer
- INSERM U1109, LabEx TRANSPLANTEX Strasbourg, France
- Department of Virology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gökmen R, Cronin A, Brown W, Cass S, Ghazanfar A, Hossain MA, Johnson J, Longdon T, Lyon S, McLean A, Motallebzadeh R, Popoola J, Samuel A, Thuraisingham R, Wood A, Dor FJMF. Kidney transplantation and patients who decline SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: an ethical framework. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1770-1775. [PMID: 34288160 PMCID: PMC8420428 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
As SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have started to be rolled out, a key question facing transplant units has been whether listing for transplantation should be contingent on recipients having received a vaccine. We aimed to provide an ethical framework when considering potential transplant candidates who decline vaccination. We convened a working group comprising transplant professionals, lay members and patients and undertook a literature review and consensus process. This group's work was also informed by discussions in two hospital clinical ethics committees. We have reviewed arguments for and against mandating vaccination prior to listing for kidney transplantation and considered some practical difficulties which may be associated with a policy of mandated vaccination. Rather than requiring that all patients must receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine prior to transplant listing, we recommend considering vaccination status as one of a number of SARS-CoV-2-related risk factors in relation to transplant listing. Transplant units should engage in individualised risk-benefit discussions with patients, avoid the language of mandated treatments and strongly encourage uptake of the vaccine in all patient groups, using tailor-made educational initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Antonia Cronin
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
- King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Wendy Brown
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | - Stephen Cass
- St George's University Hospitals NHS TrustLondonUK
- London Kidney NetworkLondonUK
| | | | | | | | | | - Sue Lyon
- Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
| | - Adam McLean
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Ayo Samuel
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
| | | | | | - Frank J. M. F. Dor
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
- Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Muir L, Jaffer A, Rees-Spear C, Gopalan V, Chang FY, Fernando R, Vaitkute G, Roustan C, Rosa A, Earl C, Rajakaruna GK, Cherepanov P, Salama A, McCoy LE, Motallebzadeh R. Neutralizing Antibody Responses After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in End-Stage Kidney Disease and Protection Against Reinfection. Kidney Int Rep 2021; 6:1799-1809. [PMID: 33942026 PMCID: PMC8081267 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.03.902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) represent a vulnerable group with multiple risk factors that are associated with poor outcomes after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Despite established susceptibility to infectious complications and the importance of humoral immunity in protection against SARS-CoV-2, few studies have investigated the humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 within this population. Here, we evaluate the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in patients awaiting renal transplantation and determine whether seroconverted patients with ESKD have durable and functional neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. METHODS Serum samples were obtained from 164 patients with ESKD by August 2020. Humoral immune responses were evaluated by SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit and nucleoprotein semiquantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and SARS-CoV-2 spike pseudotype neutralization assay. RESULTS All patients with ESKD with reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed infection (n = 17) except for 1 individual seroconverted against SARS-CoV-2. Overall seroprevalence (anti-S1 and/or anti-N IgG) was 36% and was higher in patients on hemodialysis (44.2%). A total of 35.6% of individuals who seroconverted were asymptomatic. Seroconversion in the absence of a neutralizing antibody (nAb) titer was observed in 12 patients, all of whom were asymptomatic. Repeat measurements at a median of 93 days from baseline sampling revealed that most individuals retained detectable responses although a significant drop in S1, N and nAb titers was observed. CONCLUSION Patients with ESKD, including those who develop asymptomatic disease, routinely seroconvert and produce detectable nAb titers against SARS-CoV-2. Although IgG levels wane over time, the neutralizing antibodies remain detectable in most patients, suggesting some level of protection is likely maintained, particularly in those who originally develop stronger responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luke Muir
- UCL Institute of Immunity & Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Aneesa Jaffer
- Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Chloe Rees-Spear
- UCL Institute of Immunity & Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Vignesh Gopalan
- Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Fernando Y. Chang
- Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Raymond Fernando
- Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Gintare Vaitkute
- Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | - Gayathri K. Rajakaruna
- Centre for Transplantation, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Alan Salama
- Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
- Centre for Transplantation, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Laura E. McCoy
- UCL Institute of Immunity & Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
- UCL Division of Infection & Immunity, University College London, London, UK
| | - Reza Motallebzadeh
- UCL Institute of Immunity & Transplantation, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Nephrology & Transplantation, Royal Free London NHS Trust, London, UK
- Research Department of Surgical Biotechnology, UCL Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Centre for Transplantation, Department of Renal Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Riella LV, Azzi JR, Cravedi P. Preventing Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Where Should We Begin? Nephron Clin Pract 2021; 145:280-284. [PMID: 33789316 PMCID: PMC8089451 DOI: 10.1159/000515165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Context Chronic immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of opportunistic infections. Although kidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have higher mortality than the general population, data on their risk of infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are unknown. Subject of Review A recent single-center screening study from the UK (Transplantation. 2021 Jan 1;105(1):151–7) showed that 89 (10.4%) of 855 consecutive kidney transplant recipients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Risk factors for infection included a nonwhite background, diabetes, and a history of allograft rejection. Risk factors for mortality in individuals who developed COVID-19 were older age and receiving steroids. Second Opinion This study shows that the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in kidney transplant recipients is similar to the one observed in the general population in the same area (13%), indicating that transplant recipients are not at increased risk of COVID-19. However, the investigators raise the interesting point that since transplant individuals were advised to shelter earlier than the general population, they may be in fact more susceptible. This statement is hard to substantiate, but the identification of specific risk factors for infection and poor outcomes is crucial to tailor strategies to prevent spread of the infection. This is particularly important, considering that kidney transplant recipients may be at increased risk of prolonged viral spread and in-host viral mutations, making them not just a particularly fragile population for COVID-19 but also a potentially major source of further contagions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo V Riella
- Renal Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Center for Transplantation Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jamil R Azzi
- Renal Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Transplantation Research Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paolo Cravedi
- Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Phadke VK, Scanlon N, Jordan SC, Rouphael NG. Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients. CURRENT TRANSPLANTATION REPORTS 2021; 8:127-139. [PMID: 33688459 PMCID: PMC7931983 DOI: 10.1007/s40472-021-00322-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by a complex interplay between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) dynamics and host immune responses. Hosts with altered immunity, including solid organ transplant recipients, may be at increased risk of complications and death due to COVID-19. A synthesis of the available data on immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 infection is needed to inform therapeutic and preventative strategies in this special population. RECENT FINDINGS Few studies have directly compared immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 between transplant recipients and the general population. Like non-transplant patients, transplant recipients mount an exuberant inflammatory response following initial SARS-CoV2 infection, with IL-6 levels correlating with disease severity in some, but not all studies. Transplant recipients display anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and activated B cells in a time frame and magnitude similar to non-transplant patients-limited data suggest these antibodies can be detected within 15 days of symptom onset and may be durable for several months. CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphopenia, a hallmark of COVID-19, is more profound in transplant recipients, but SARS-CoV-2-reactive T cells can be detected among patients with both mild and severe disease. SUMMARY The limited available data indicate that immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 are similar between transplant recipients and the general population, but no studies have been sufficiently comprehensive to understand nuances between organ types or level of immunosuppression to meaningfully inform individualized therapeutic decisions. The ongoing pandemic provides an opportunity to generate higher-quality data to support rational treatment and vaccination strategies in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varun K. Phadke
- Emory University Vaccine and Treatment Evaluation Unit (VTEU), Division of Infectious Diseases, The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, 500 Irvin Court, Suite 200, Decatur, GA 30030 USA
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| | - Nicholas Scanlon
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Transplant Immunology Laboratory, Transplant Immunotherapy Program, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA USA
| | - Nadine G. Rouphael
- The Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Emory University, Decatur, GA USA
| |
Collapse
|