This study aimed to identify distinct profiles of quality of life (QoL) and lifestyle behaviors among cancer survivors and explore their associations with clinical and demographic factors.

A cross-sectional survey was conducted globally from July to November 2020 among cancer survivors aged 18 and older. Sedentary behavior and sleep were assessed using a modified Domain-Specific Sitting Time Questionnaire, physical activity with the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire, and QoL via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale. Latent profile analysis identified subgroups based on lifestyle behaviors, and multinomial logistic regression examined clinical and demographic associations.

Among 477 cancer survivors (Mage = 48.5 ± 15.4 years), predominantly female (69.6%) and diagnosed with breast cancer (29.3%), three latent profiles were identified: Class 1 ("Limited 24-Hour Movement with Low Well-being"), Class 2 ("Partial 24-Hour Movement with Moderate Well-being"), and Class 3 ("Complete 24-Hour Movement with High Well-being"). Class 3 had the highest physical activity, lowest sedentary time, and best QoL, associated with older age, lower body mass index, fewer comorbidities, and less chemotherapy or hormone therapy.

Identifying latent profiles of QoL and lifestyle behaviors highlights opportunities for tailored interventions in cancer survivorship care.

Survivors in low well-being profiles may benefit from targeted interventions to reduce sedentary behavior, increase physical activity, and address fatigue and comorbidities. Those in high well-being profiles may need support to sustain healthy habits and manage emotional well-being.

Characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and economic impacts associated with sickle cell disease (SCD) with recurrent vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs).

A prospective longitudinal real-world study was performed with adults with SCD with recurrent VOCs in the US and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, and the UK). Evidence of recurrent VOCs was self-reported (≥ 2 VOCs per year in each of the 2 years before enrolment). Study outcomes were reported at baseline, months 3, and 6 and included self-reported demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-5D-5 L VAS, FACT-G, FACIT-F, 11-point numerical rating scale [NRS] of pain, ASCQ-Me, WPAI), and bespoke questions on financial burden, stigma/prejudice, and time burden associated with SCD.

Participants (N = 142) reported an annual mean (standard deviation) of 5.9 (4.8) VOCs requiring hospitalization and 7.5 (7.7) VOCs requiring home management in the past 24 months. Participants reported fatigue and HRQoL impairment, demonstrated by significantly lower baseline EQ-5D-5 L utility and VAS, FACT-G, and FACIT-F scores compared to published information about the US general population. Participants also reported increased pain, stiffness, and emotional impacts compared to a reference sample of adults with SCD on the ASCQ-Me, and most (60%) reported moderate to extreme pain/discomfort on the NRS of pain. Out-of-pocket expenses represented a moderate-to-major burden for 61.9% of participants, with employed participants missing a mean of 9.8 h of work in the last 7 days.

Participants reported significant impairments to their HRQoL and financial constraints associated with SCD with recurrent VOCs, indicating humanistic and economic burden and unmet needs in this population.

To characterize the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and economic impacts of transfusion-dependent β-thalassemia (TDT).

A prospective longitudinal real-world study was conducted in adults with TDT in the US and Europe (France, Germany, Italy, UK) over 6 months. Eligibility criteria included receiving ≥ 8 blood transfusions/year in each of the 2 years before enrollment. Study outcomes assessed at months 0, 3, and 6, included demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcome measures (EQ-VAS, FACT-G, FACIT-F, 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) of pain, TranQoL, and WPAI), and responses to bespoke questions on financial burden/distress.

Overall, 155 adults with TDT participated (mean age [standard deviation (SD)]: 38.5 [10.8] years; 65.8% female). Most participants resided in the US (53.5%) or UK (22.6%). EQ-VAS, FACT-G, and FACIT-F mean (SD) scores at month 0 were lower among participants than the US general population (67.1 [20.4] versus 80.4 [15.6], 70.1 [19.0] versus 77.0 [16.1], and 27.9 [13.7] versus 43.6 [9.4], respectively; all p < 0.001). Mean (SD) TranQoL total score was 53.9 (18.5) and overall level of pain was "moderate" (NRS mean [SD]: 3.5 [2.8]). Part- or full-time employed participants missed a mean of 5.9 h of work in the preceding 7 days with out-of-pocket expenses being a moderate-to-major burden for 55% of participants. The findings were consistent over time.

Participants reported substantial humanistic and economic burdens associated with living with TDT. Our findings highlight the need for alternative treatment options that contribute to improvements in HRQoL and reduce economic burden in this patient population.

This review aims to investigate Financial Toxicity (FT) among cancer patients across several different healthcare systems. It identifies factors that contribute to FT and proposes policies to mitigate its effects on cancer patients.

Articles published between January 1st 2017 and March 31st 2022, describing Financial Toxicity experienced by cancer patients, were identified using PubMed, Scopus, Springer, and Science Direct databases. Papers written in English language, quantitative papers describing studies conducted in countries with public and mixed healthcare systems were considered eligible.

Based on 7917 records screened, 61 publications met our inclusion criteria. According to our findings, the referred prevalence of financial toxicity among cancer patients was up to 54 % in the United States, 44.7 % in high-income nations with public healthcare systems, and 80.4 % in low-income nations. Worse financial toxicity is linked to age under 65 years, low income, insurance status, high monthly out-of-pocket expenses, and cancer-related factors.

Financial toxicity is a widespread issue among cancer patients, and it is influenced by both socioeconomic and cancer-related factors, even in different countries and healthcare systems.

Patients who suffer from cancer often face very serious financial problems. The source of these problems is the increased cost of both the treatments and the drugs that they have to take for long periods and often for their entire lives, so there is a risk that patients do not have the necessary income to cover these costs, leading to patients' developing coping mechanisms such as not fully adhering doctors' instructions for treatment or even forgoing treatment, hence, putting their lives in immediate danger. This phenomenon is called financial toxicity. The cost of treatments as well as the financial burden borne by patients is not the same for everyone and depends both on the coverage of these expenses provided by each country's health system and on the personal characteristics of each patient such as age, amount of income, the existence or not of insurance coverage, daily out-of-pocket expenses as well as characteristics of the cancer such as the stage, type and metastatic disease. To improve the situation, it will be necessary to implement coordinated efforts between patients, providers, health systems, payers, and policy makers at multiple levels. For example, to tackle financial toxicity among cancer patients, tools could be implemented to identify those most vulnerable, considering factors like income, insurance coverage, and treatment costs. Hospitals could also establish financial counseling structures to help patients make the best treatment decisions based on to their financial status.

Metastatic breast cancer (mBC) remains incurable, highlighting the importance of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in treatment decision making. In the randomized phase III PALOMA-2 trial, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was maintained in patients receiving first-line palbociclib plus letrozole compared with placebo plus letrozole after a median follow-up of 22.3 months. However, little is known about HRQoL for patients taking palbociclib for an extended period of time. Here, we report the PRO results from the PALOMA-2 trial after a median follow-up time of 90 months.

Women with estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (ER+/HER2-) mBC were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to receive palbociclib plus letrozole (n = 444) or placebo plus letrozole (n = 222). HRQoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) and EuroQoL five-dimensions three-level (EQ-5D-3L) questionnaires, administered on site on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 3 and then every other cycle from cycle 5 until study end. Treatment arm comparisons were made for change from baseline in QoL and time to deterioration in FACT-B (definitive definition, TTDD).

After a median follow-up of 90 months, no significant differences between treatments were observed for overall change from baseline in FACT-B total, FACT-B subscales, and EQ-5D-3L scores. While TTDD did not differ between treatment arms, TTDD was shorter for patients with disease progression versus those without disease progression (hazard ratio 0.644, P < 0.001). Individual items assessing side-effects and hair loss favored the palbociclib plus letrozole arm versus the letrozole arm; no treatment difference was observed for items assessing pain.

This extended follow-up analysis of PROs in PALOMA-2 shows continued QoL maintenance for patients with ER+/HER2- mBC receiving long-term palbociclib plus letrozole treatment.

The primary purpose was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a group health coaching (GHC) program with cancer patients and survivors; secondarily, to determine the preliminary effects of GHC on several behavioral lifestyle factors.

GHC was provided to people diagnosed with cancer via videoconference by trained health coaches across six GHC sessions over a 3-month period. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected. Data on recruitment, attrition, attendance, fidelity, retention, safety, and barriers and facilitators to implementation were assessed. Participant-reported outcomes collected via surveys included physical activity, eating habits, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, sleep, and quality of life, followed by post-program focus groups and in-depth interviews. Survey results were analyzed using repeated measures multilevel modeling. Qualitative data was analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.

Overall, 26 participants with a variety of cancer types attended an average of 74% of coaching sessions. The intervention was feasible to implement and found acceptable by participants and health coaches. Over the course of the intervention, there was a moderate increase in total weekly physical activity minutes (baseline = 365.25, follow-up = 510.30, p = 0.032, d = 0.50), and a small increase in weekly moderate-vigorous physical activity frequency (baseline = 4.07 bouts, follow-up = 5.44 bouts, p = 0.045, d = 0.39). Additionally, a moderate increase was found in functional well-being (baseline = 16.30, follow-up = 18.93, p < 0.001, d = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GHC may be a feasible and acceptable way to promote behavior change for physical activity in cancer patients and survivors, reducing cancer burden and enhancing functional well-being.

To deliver timely palliative care in response to supportive and palliative care needs as they arise, we developed a model called "Supportive and Palliative care Review Kit in Locations Everywhere" (SPARKLE), which comprises regular remote symptom monitoring using the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS); early identification and prompt treatment of palliative care symptoms and concerns identified; and referral to specialist palliative care if follow-up is required.

A prospective randomized controlled trial of SPARKLE versus usual care was conducted among patients with advanced cancers. The primary endpoint was Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scores at 16 weeks post randomization.

A total of 239 patients were randomized-119 patients to usual care and 120 patients to SPARKLE intervention. There was no significant difference in total FACT-G score (baseline-adjusted difference 0.8, 95% CI - 3.5 to 5.1, p = 0.73). Physical well-being was better in the SPARKLE intervention group compared to the usual care group (baseline-adjusted difference 1.9, 95%CI 0.4 to 3.4, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the other domain scores. There were no differences in palliative care referrals, occurrence of emergency department visits, or hospital admissions.

Although there was no significant difference in overall quality of life, better physical symptom control could have been achieved through proactive identification and treatment of symptoms and concerns by the SPARKLE nurse. Further studies are warranted to evaluate how various components of palliative care service models impact clinical outcomes.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04242251. Date of registration: 23 January 2020.

Bright IDEAS-Young Adults (Bright IDEAS-YA) is a problem-solving skills training intervention that has been adapted for young adults with cancer. Presently, a multisite randomized control trial is being conducted to determine Bright IDEAS-YA's efficacy in supporting a young adult population. This case study demonstrates the young adult adaptation of Bright IDEAS - Bright IDEAS-YA - being delivered to a young adult cancer patient via telehealth. Telehealth is a novel delivery method for Bright IDEAS and Bright IDEAS-YA that was established due to COVID-19 safety precautions. The patient, who reported challenges in several life domains, was taught how to apply the Bright IDEAS-YA framework over six telehealth sessions. After completing the Bright IDEAS-YA framework, the patient reported increased feelings of confidence in managing new stressors, which was corroborated through outcome measures delivered during and following intervention. This case illustrates how early psychosocial intervention following a cancer diagnosis, delivered via telehealth, can help patients develop and implement personal strategies to reduce stress levels.

Preoperative anemia is common and associated with adverse outcomes in surgical patients. There is limited information to guide the design and implementation of preoperative anemia clinics (PAC), which represents a critical barrier to entry for many practices.

This is a descriptive observational study highlighting the design and implementation of a multidisciplinary PAC, including key steps in planning, stakeholder engagement, organizational structure, identification of target populations, establishing anemia treatments, information technology and electronic health record integration, provider training, and data infrastructure. Demographic and clinical characteristics, laboratory results, and anemia treatments for individuals evaluated in the PAC from November 4, 2019 through September 15, 2023 are enumerated. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) assessing changes in anemia symptoms and well-being after surgery are evaluated for 2 subsets of patients (one before PAC implementation [pre-PAC], another after PAC implementation [post-PAC]), without formal statistical comparison given limited sample sizes.

The PAC was initiated as a multidisciplinary effort under support from a Mayo Clinic Practice Transformation Award in 2019, including broad representation from anesthesiology, surgery, and medical practices, along with institutional project management support (eg, project manager, information technologists, systems engineers). While initially limited to cardiac surgery patients, the PAC underwent planned incremental expansion to include other surgical services. Over the study period, 1188 PAC consultations across 1159 unique patients met eligibility criteria, with a median age of 66 (57-73) years and 58.1% women. The most common etiology of anemia was iron deficiency (69.1%) followed by anemia related to cancer (17.3%). Anemia-directed therapies were recommended in 1038 (87.4%) encounters, with 730 (70.3%) of those receiving recommended treatment preoperatively. Seven hundred nine (97.1%) treatments included intravenous iron and 146 (20.0%) included erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Fifteen pre-PAC and 38 post-PAC implementation patients completed PROs. PAC implementation was accompanied by earlier resolution of anemia symptoms and less pronounced declines in postoperative well-being scores.

This report highlights the key steps for successful PAC implementation. Treatment is possible for most patients and may be accompanied by improvements in patient-important outcomes.

As health care systems seek to screen for and address housing instability in patient populations, robust evidence linking unstable housing to patient-reported outcomes is needed. Housing instability may increase psychological distress in cancer survivors, potentially more so among African American cancer survivors who are also likely to experience disproportionate burden of housing instability. The purpose of this analysis was to estimate associations between housing instability and psychological distress in African Americans diagnosed with cancer.

We included survey responses from 2875 African American cancer survivors in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) study. We examined how housing instability at enrollment, using an item adapted from the Health Leads Screening Toolkit, related to psychological distress at enrollment, using Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement System (PROMIS) 4-item anxiety and depression short forms. Linear regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors were used to estimate associations overall and stratified by stage at diagnosis.

Approximately 12% of participants reported being unstably housed. Housing instability was associated with significant differences in PROMIS scores for both anxiety (difference: 6.79; 95% CI: 5.57-8.01) and depression (difference: 6.16; 95% CI: 4.99-7.34). We did not find meaningful differences stratifying by disease stage.

Housing instability was experienced by over a tenth of this cohort of African American cancer survivors and was related to statistically and clinically meaningful differences in psychological distress even following adjustment for sociodemographics.

These findings provide evidence supporting screening of housing instability in cancer survivors, especially those from medically underserved populations.

Physical activity (PA) is associated with better quality of life for cancer survivors; however, less is known about this association among individuals with advanced cancer. This study assesses whether changes in PA following an advanced cancer diagnosis are associated with health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes.

Data were collected from 247 participants in a survey of adults with advanced cancer who visited the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (January 2021-2023). PA since cancer diagnosis was assessed using a validated, self-reported tool. HRQoL was assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System measures of physical function, fatigue, and pain interference. We used generalized linear models to assess relationships between PA and HRQoL.

Most adults with advanced cancer were insufficiently active (53%), and reported a lot less activity (41%) after diagnosis, followed by a little less activity (33%), and the same/more activity (26%). Compared to the other activity groups, those who reported a lot less activity had the worst HRQoL scores, including lower HRQoL (x̄ = 70.3 vs. x̄ = 82.6, 90.7) and physical function (x̄ = 40.3 vs. x̄ = 47.3, 52.5), and higher fatigue (x̄ = 59.3 vs. x̄ = 51.4, 42.3) and pain interference (x̄ = 55.5 vs. x̄ = 48.8, 45.6).

Adults with advanced cancer who report PA reductions have worse HRQoL, higher pain and fatigue, and lower physical function than those engaging in the same/more PA since their diagnosis. Future interventions focused on improving HRQoL among adults with advanced cancer should incorporate light-intensity PA to reduce declines following diagnosis.

Cancer diagnosis represents a life crisis. It remains unclear whether/what psychosocial intervention may enhance cancer patients' quality of life (QoL) during existential plight. This study aimed to examine preliminary efficacy of a brief writing intervention for patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer with a focus on affirming personally important values and beliefs.

This is a single-arm pilot study testing effect of a 4-week home-based self-affirmation writing intervention for patients newly diagnosed with advanced cancer using interrupted time series design (NCT05235750). Patients were eligible if they were newly diagnosed (within 8 weeks) with advanced stage (III or IV) or recurrent cancer. Longitudinal analyses were performed using generalized linear mixed model incorporating the correlation of repeated measures. All statistical analyses were performed at 5% significance level using SAS® (version 9.4).

Fifty-seven patients newly diagnosed with advanced stage cancer with a mean age of 63 years balanced in gender were enrolled. Intent-to-treat analysis revealed significant post-intervention change for Faith as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being 12 item scale (FACIT-Sp-12) (ES 0.23, p = .05) and Ge6 "I worry that my condition will get worse" as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G) (ES 0.26, p = .10). When comparing changes pre- and post-intervention, Ge6 remained clinically significant (ESΔ 0.36, p = .27).

Self-affirmation via writing showed initial short-term efficacy in relieving cancer-specific existential concerns (Ge6 "I worry that my condition will get worse") and may be a promising innovative intervention approach that warrant randomized experiments to verify. Further research is also needed to find out who may most likely benefit from this intervention.

Exercise interventions are among the best-known interventions for cancer-related fatigue (CRF). Rural survivors of cancer, however, report specific barriers to engaging in exercise programs and lack overall access to effective programs.

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the feasibility of a novel telehealth exercise program designed specifically for rural survivors of cancer with CRF.

A single-arm clinical trial of the BfitBwell Telehealth Program was performed. Based on an established clinical program, this adapted 12-week program addressed barriers previously reported by rural survivors by providing synchronous videoconference exercise sessions (2 per program), asynchronous exercise sessions using a personal training smartphone or internet app (3-5 per week), and regular symptom (CRF) monitoring using automated emailed surveys (every 2 weeks). Personalized exercise prescriptions containing aerobic and resistance activities were implemented by cancer exercise specialists. Symptom-triggered synchronous sessions were initiated for participants failing to improve in CRF, as identified by a reference chart of CRF improvements observed during a supervised exercise program. Eligible participants were adult survivors of any cancer diagnosis who had completed treatment with curative intent in the past 12 months or had no planned changes in treatment for the duration of the study, lived in a rural area, and were currently experiencing CRF. Feasibility was assessed by objective measures of recruitment, data collection, intervention acceptability and suitability, and preliminary evaluations of participant responses. CRF was the primary clinical outcome (assessed using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale [FACIT-Fatigue]) and was measured before, after, and 6 months after program completion.

In total, 19 participants enrolled in the study, 16 initiated the exercise program, and 15 completed the program. A total of 14 participants were recruited through internet advertisements, and the total recruitment rate peaked at 5 participants per month. Participants completed 100% of initial and final assessments (30 assessments across all participants) and 93% (70/75 possible surveys across all participants) of emailed surveys and attended 97% (29/30 possible sessions across all participants) of synchronous exercise sessions. In total, 6 participants initiated symptom-triggered sessions, with 6 of 7 initiated sessions attended. The mean FACIT-Fatigue scores significantly improved (P=.001) by 11.2 (SD 6.8) points following the completion of the program. A total of 13 participants demonstrated at least a minimal clinically important difference in FACIT-Fatigue scores (≥ +3 points) at this time. FACIT-Fatigue scores did not significantly change from program completion to 6-month follow-up (n=13; mean change -1.1, SD 3.4 points; P=.29).

Results from this investigation support the feasibility of the BfitBwell Telehealth Program and a subsequent efficacy trial. Novel program components also provide potential models for improving exercise program efficacy and efficiency through asynchronous exercise prescription and symptom monitoring.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04533165; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533165.

Little is known about cancer-related cognitive impairments (CRCI) in women with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The purpose of this study is to (1) comprehensively describe CRCI and any associated psychosocial and behavioral symptoms, (2) determine observable sociodemographic and clinical risk factors for CRCI, and (3) explore cognitive and psychosocial predictors of quality of life and social functioning in women living with MBC.

Using a cross-sectional design, women with MBC completed assessments (objective and subjective measures of CRCI including 3 open-ended questions, measures of psychosocial and behavioral factors, and assessments of quality of life and social function), and data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, qualitative content analysis, correlation analyses, t tests, analysis of variance, and linear regression models.

Data from 52 women were analyzed. 69.2% of the sample reported clinically significant CRCI and 46% of the sample scored < 1 standard deviation below the standardized mean on one or more cognitive tests. Those with triple-negative MBC (compared to HER2+), recurrent MBC (compared to de novo), and no history of chemotherapy had worse subjective CRCI, and those without history of surgery and older age had worse objective CRCI. Subjective CRCI, but not objective CRCI, was significantly associated with quality of life and social functioning.

Subjective and objective CRCI are likely a common problem for those with MBC. Subjective CRCI is associated with poorer quality of life and lower social functioning. Healthcare providers should acknowledge cognitive symptoms, continually assess cognitive function, and address associated unmet needs across the MBC trajectory.

This pilot study aimed to provide supportive evidence for the feasibility of conducting a full-scale intervention trial with patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer (HNC). This included assessing the acceptability and potential usefulness of the PTSD Coach mobile app as an early self-management intervention that gives information about anxiety symptoms, offers self-assessment of symptoms with feedback, tools to self-manage anxiety, and connects to support.

A three-arm randomized controlled trial was conducted. The primary pilot study questions related to feasibility were: (1) can we recruit enough (i.e., n = 60 over 8 months or 8/month) and retain a sufficient proportion (i.e., ≥ 85% at three months post-randomization, having completed the primary outcome) of patients with HNC in all trial arms? (2) Will there be at least a 90% completion rate of PTSD Coach within 3 weeks from randomization? (3) Will at least 85% of the content for each module of PTSD Coach be completed? (4) Will there be at least a 90% completion rate of the attention-control tasks (i.e., 45 min/week over 3 weeks)? (5) What would be the anticipated sample size for a full study? (6) We also explored a signal for intervention effects on 1-, 3-, and 6-month levels of cancer-related anxiety, quality of life, anxiety and depression, self-stigma of seeking help, and professional psycho-oncology service uptake.

Participants comprised 39 patients (11 experimental group (EG), 13 attention-control (AC), 15 usual care (UC)), primarily male (82%). Enrolment was lower than expected, with strategies implemented to increase the study's participation rate (i.e., shortening the questionnaire, more relevant AC games, pacing study components, and enlarging eligibility to 4 weeks post-diagnosis instead of 2). Retention rates, intervention completion rates, and completion time were adequate. The intervention was acceptable with all patients (100%) who received PTSD Coach reporting it a positive experience and that they would recommend it to others. When compared to UC, there was a signal for the PTSD Coach group to report lower 3-month cancer-related anxiety (PCL-S; eta squared = 0.013), lower anxiety and depression (HADS; eta squared = 0.015), anxiety (HADS-A; eta squared = 0.028), and higher functional wellbeing (FACT-FW; eta squared = 0.09), based on effect sizes calculated across all three groups. The sample size for a full study was estimated to be 118 to 154 per group.

A repeat pilot study with an expanded oncology population is warranted to further investigate feasibility prior to a full Phase III study. PTSD Coach could be a valuable self-management tool as an initial stepped-care approach intervention in patients newly diagnosed with HNC.

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03651570 . Registered June 26, 2018.

Advances in cancer screening and treatment have improved survival after a diagnosis of cancer. As the number of cancer survivors as well as their overall life-expectancy increases, investigations of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are critical in understanding the factors that promote the optimal experience over the course of survivorship. However, there is a dearth of information on determinants of HRQOL for African American cancer survivors as the vast majority of cohorts have been conducted predominantly among non-Hispanic Whites. In this review, we provide a review of the literature related to HRQOL in cancer survivors including those in African Americans. We then present a summary of published work from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort, a population-based cohort of more than 5000 African American cancer survivors. Overall, Detroit ROCS has markedly advanced our understanding of the unique factors contributing to poorer HRQOL among African Americans with cancer. This work and future studies will help inform potential interventions to improve the long-term health of this patient population.

High-grade (HGOC) and low-grade ovarian carcinoma (LGOC) are distinct malignancies with different biological features, treatment paradigms, and life expectancies. However, differences in quality of life (QOL), sleep, and depressive symptoms have not been examined by grade, and neither have inflammatory profiles associated with these symptoms. We aim to characterize QOL and biomarkers by OC grade.

Participants included patients with HGOC (N = 578) or LGOC (N = 85). Participants completed baseline assessments of psychosocial factors prior to primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy and contributed saliva for cortisol and blood for interleukin-6 (IL-6) quantification. Samples were collected intraoperatively to quantify tumor cortisol. General linear models were used to examine differences in biological and psychological variables by grade.

At baseline, patients with LGOC reported less depression (p = 0.018) and sleep disturbances (p = 0.014), but no significant difference in depressive mood (p = 0.11) or QOL (p = 0.51) compared to patients with HGOC, adjusting for age and disease stage. There were trends towards lower tumor cortisol levels (p = 0.078) in LGOC compared to HGOC. One-year post-diagnosis, we found a significant improvement in QOL and fatigue, and a decrease in vegetative depression and IL-6 levels irrespective of grade.

We present the first characterization of psychosocial experiences of patients with LGOC. Despite having a better disease prognosis, patients with LGOC were just as likely to have mood disturbances as those with HGOC. There was a trend towards differences in tumor cortisol by grade. Our findings highlight the need to address well-being in patients with both low- and high-grade ovarian malignancies.

The Blood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) Clinical Trials Network conducted a phase 3 randomized trial comparing gilteritinib with placebo after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for FLT3-ITD+ acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The primary analysis demonstrated no statistically significant difference in relapse-free survival (RFS); however, patients with FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) peri-HCT had significantly longer RFS with gilteritinib. This analysis investigates the effect of post-HCT gilteritinib vs placebo on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL was measured with Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT), FACT-Leukemia (FACT-Leu), and EuroQOL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at post-HCT randomization; day 29; months 3, 6, 12, 18, 24; and/or end of therapy. HRQOL and clinically meaningful differences were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using mixed model repeated measures to evaluate longitudinal change from baseline and stratified Cox model to evaluate time to improvement. HRQOL completion rate was acceptable (>70%) across all time points and measures. There were no differences in HRQOL scores at any time point between cohorts. Clinically meaningful and time to improvement in HRQOL were similar in both arms. Despite higher treatment-emergent adverse effects with gilteritinib, response to the question of being "bothered by side effects of treatment" did not differ between groups. Subgroup analysis of MRD-positive and negative patients demonstrated no differences in HRQOL between arms. For patients with FLT3-ITD+ AML undergoing HCT, gilteritinib maintenance was not associated with any difference in HRQOL or patient-reported impact of side effects. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02997202.

Young adults with cancer diagnosed between the ages of 18 to 39 are recognized as a vulnerable group with unique emotional, social, and practical needs that put them at risk of poor psychosocial outcomes and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL). This study describes the protocol of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of Bright IDEAS-Young Adults (Bright IDEAS-YA), a problem-solving skills training intervention, on psychosocial outcomes of young adults newly diagnosed with cancer.

Bright IDEAS-YA is a two-arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial. Young adults are eligible if they are 18-39 years of age, within four months of a first cancer diagnosis, and receiving systemic therapy with life expectancy of at least six months. Participants are randomized 1:1 to Bright IDEAS-YA or enhanced usual care. Survey measures are completed at enrollment and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint will be the estimated change from baseline to 6 months in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial HRQOL. The other time points are secondary endpoints. Mediators and moderators will be examined.

This randomized trial will determine the efficacy of Bright IDEAS-YA on psychosocial outcomes for young adults newly diagnosed with cancer. Analyses will also examine mechanisms of action and potentially identify subgroups for whom the intervention is particularly useful.

clinicaltrials.gov #NCT04585269.

Physical frailty as a sign of accelerated aging is not well characterized in breast cancer (BC) and hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) survivors and its correlation with outcomes and quality of life (QOL) is not defined. We conducted a prospective study to determine the prevalence of frailty in adult BC and HCT survivors, examine its impact on QOL, and determine its association with p16INK4a, a molecular biomarker for biological aging. The study included 59 BC and 65 HCT survivors. Median age was 60 years (range 27-81), 68.5% were female and 49.2% were 18-59 vs. 51.8% ≥60 years old. A total of 71 (57.3%) were "fit" (frailty score 0) vs. 53 (42.7%) were pre-frailty/frail (frailty scores ≥1), and of the latter 17 (32.1%) were BC and 36 (67.9%) HCT patients. On multivariate analysis, patients >60 years were twice as likely to be frail (OR 2.04, 95% CI, 0.96-4.33; p=0.07), HCT were more likely to be frail compared to BC patients, and female HCT had 2.43 (95% CI, 0.92-6.40) and male HCT patients had 3.25 (95% CI, 1.37-7.72) times higher risk of frail; p=0.02. Frailty was associated with significant decline in QOL, measured by Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS), and FACT (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy) scores. p16INK4a expression was higher in those who were frail, older than 60, and with higher expression in frail vs. fit patients who are 18-59 years. Our study highlights the high prevalence of frailty in survivors with detrimental effects on physical and overall wellbeing, and supports an association between frailty and the senescence marker p16INK4a.

Chemotherapy-induced polyneuropathy (CIPN) encompasses a spectrum of symptoms ranging from hypoesthesia with impaired gait, stance and fine motor skills to painful dysesthesia and allodynia and significantly impairs the quality of life of those affected. In the present pilot study, quantitative sensory testing (QST) was used to investigate CIPN as a common adverse effect of cytostatic drugs in patients with incurable cancer. The QST is a standardized examination procedure that is not yet routinely used in cancer patients. It is used to examine thermal and mechanical perception and pain thresholds to record the subjectively experienced pain phenotype. In the N‑Check pilot project, the QST was used before and after tumor-specific, potentially CIPN-inducing treatment and the data collected was compared in a pre-post analysis. In addition, the specific effects of CIPN on the health-related quality of life of patients treated primarily with a palliative intention were recorded using the Functional Assessment for Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. Overall, the patients showed significant heat hypoalgesia after chemotherapy as a sign of damage to small nerve fibers. In addition, there were signs of deterioration of the quality of life. The feasibility of QST in patients with incurable cancer and palliative, neurotoxic chemotherapy was demonstrated in this pilot study.

Sexual dysfunction is a significant complication of treatment for many adult-onset cancers. However, comparatively less is known about sexual dysfunction in adult childhood cancer survivors (CCSs). Research has been limited by the exclusion of specific cancers (e.g., central nervous system [CNS] tumors) and the lack of validated measures, which makes it difficult to understand the nature and prevalence of sexual dysfunction in CCSs.

A total of 249 adult CCSs (aged 18-65 years) enrolled in Project REACH, a prospective cohort study, and completed measures of physical and mental health, including sexual dysfunction. Participants scoring ≤19 on the Female Sexual Function Index 6 or ≤21 on the International Index of Erectile Function 5 were classified as experiencing sexual dysfunction. Analyses examined the relationships between sexual dysfunction and demographic, disease, treatment, and health variables.

A total of 78 participants (32%) experienced clinically significant sexual dysfunction. In univariate analysis, sexual dysfunction was significantly associated with CNS tumor diagnosis (odds ratio [OR], 2.56) and surgery (OR, 1.96) as well as with health variables such as fatigue (OR, 3.00), poor sleep (OR, 2.84), pain (OR, 2.04), depression (OR, 2.64), poor physical health (OR, 2.45), and poor mental health (OR, 2.21). Adjusted analyses found that CNS tumor diagnosis (p = .001) and health variables (p = .025) contribute significantly to sexual dysfunction in CCSs.

Approximately one third of adult CCSs report clinically significant sexual dysfunction, which underscores a significant screening and treatment need. However, because available measures were developed for survivors of adult cancers, research to create a sexual health measure specifically for adult CCSs is necessary to better identify the sexual health concerns of this vulnerable population.

Pre-treatment characteristics of women with early breast cancer that are associated with persistent fatigue or suboptimal health-related quality of life (HRQOL) post-chemotherapy need to be identified as potential targets for pre-habilitation.

Ancillary analysis of previously collected data from patients with newly diagnosed Stage I-III breast cancer scheduled to receive chemotherapy. The objective was to identify baseline (pre-chemotherapy) variables associated with meaningful deteriorations in fatigue and other measures of HRQOL from pre-treatment to 6 months after chemotherapy completion. Percentages are reported along with unadjusted and adjusted relative risks.

In a sample of 249 women post-chemotherapy, 32% reported worsening fatigue (FACIT-F), 35% worsening Physical Well-Being (PWB), 16% worsening Functional Well-Being (FWB), 8% worsening Emotional Well-Being (EWB), and 30% worsening Social Well-Being (SWB). In multivariable (MV) analysis, variables that were significant in univariate analysis - Black race, high BMI, and baseline poorer EWB - remained significant for worsening post-chemotherapy fatigue (FACIT-F). In MV analysis that included race, education, falls, and baseline EWB, Black race and a positive falls history remained significant for worsening PWB. In MV analysis inclusive of race, Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and FWB, lower SPPB and FWB remained significant predictors of worsening FWB. In MV analysis that included baseline Mental Health Index-Anxiety, EWB and SWB, a higher SWB and lower EWB remained significant for worsening SWB.

Pre-chemotherapy characteristics in women with early-stage breast cancer that are associated with increased fatigue and reduced HRQOL post-treatment could be used to identify patients who may benefit from pre-habilitation interventions.

Financial toxicity is used to describe the financial hardship experienced by cancer patients. Financial toxicity may cause negative consequences to patients, whereas little is known in Chinese context. This study aimed to explore the level of financial toxicity, coping strategies, and quality of life among Chinese patients with hematologic malignancies.

We conducted a prospective, observational study among 274 Chinese patients with hematologic malignancies from November 2021 to August 2022 in Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Clinical data were extracted from electronic clinical records. Data on financial toxicity, coping strategies, and quality of life were collected using PRO measures. Chi-square or independent t test and multivariate logistic regression were performed to explore the associated factors of financial toxicity and quality of life, respectively. Effects of financial toxicity on coping strategies were examined using Chi-square.

The mean age of the participants was 50.2 (± 14.6) years. Male participants accounted for 57.3%. About half of the participants reported high financial toxicity. An average median of ¥200,000 on total medical expenditures since the diagnosis was reported. The average median monthly out-of-pocket health expenditure relating to cancer treatment was ¥20,000 (range ¥632-¥172,500) after reimbursement. Reduce daily living expenses (64.9%), borrowing money (55.7%), and choosing cheaper regimens (19.6%) were the commonly used strategies to cope with financial burden. Financial toxicity was negatively associated with quality of life (β = 0.071, P = 0.001).

Financial toxicity was not uncommon in patients with hematological malignancies. Reducing daily living expenses, abandoning treatment sessions, and borrowing money were the strategies commonly adopted by participants to defray cancer costs. Additionally, participants with high level of financial toxicity tended to have worse quality of life. Therefore, actions from healthcare providers, policy-makers, and other stakeholders should be taken to help cancer patients mitigate their financial toxicity.

This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: To evaluate the benefits and harms of secondary CRS and chemotherapy in comparison to chemotherapy alone for women with platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

We conducted a systematic review to describe health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in rural cancer survivors (RCS), and compare HRQOL between RCS and urban cancer survivors (UCS).

We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL Plus, and PsycINFO for studies with HRQOL in adult cancer survivors living in rural, regional, remote, and urban areas, who had completed definitive primary cancer treatment, without evidence of residual disease. Where available, we used normative and clinically important values to ascribe meaning to HRQOL data.

Fifteen studies (16 papers) were included. Most were from the US (n = 8) and reported on breast cancer survivors (n = 9). Six HRQOL instruments, collecting data across 16 domains, were used. Three instruments were specific to the survivorship phase. Normative and clinical data were available for 12 studies. Compared with normative populations, RCS had clinically worse physical HRQOL (6/12 studies), better social/family (5/7), and functional (3/6) HRQOL, and there were no differences in emotional or/mental HRQOL (9/12). In six studies with rural-urban comparator groups and normative and clinically important data, RCS and UCS had clinically worse physical (3/6 and 2/6, respectively) and better social/family (3/4 and 2/4 studies, respectively) HRQOL than normative populations. Functional HRQOL was better in RCS (2/4 studies) than UCS and normative populations. In 3/6 studies, there were no clinical differences in emotional or/mental HRQOL between RCS, UCS, and normative populations.

Overall, HRQOL is not clearly better or worse in RCS than UCS. Future research should include different tumor types, rural residents, and survivorship-specific HRQOL instruments.

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) often undergo physical decline leading to negative outcomes. Identification of distinct trajectories may help guide clinical decision-making and supportive care interventions. We built group-based trajectory models (GBTM) to find trajectories of change in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Physical Well-Being (FACT-PWB) subscale (up to 5 time points over 0 to 200 days of follow-up) using data from adults with newly diagnosed AML in 4 supportive care studies. We also estimated the association of baseline characteristics (age, marital status, education, AML risk, baseline FACT-PWB, depression, and anxiety) with group membership. Among 343 patients with ≥2 FACT-PWB scores, mean age was 69.6 years (standard deviation, 12.1); most had intermediate-risk AML (n = 178 [51.8%]), received intensive treatment (n = 244 [71.1%]), and died during follow-up (n = 199 [58.0%]). The GBTM with 4 distinct trajectories showed the best fit. The largest group (n = 153 [45.0%]) showed slight improvement, whereas the smallest (n = 8 [2.4%]) experienced early decline with later improvement. Baseline FACT-PWB was the only characteristic statistically significantly associated with group membership. Adults with AML show distinct trajectories of physical well-being, and many experience some decline. Exploring trajectories of self-reported and objective physical function may inform decision-making and interventions. These trials were registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02975869, #NCT03310918, and #NCT03372291.

To determine the safety, feasibility, and potential effect of an 18-week exercise intervention for adults with primary brain cancer.

Eligible patients were 12-26-weeks post-radiotherapy for brain cancer. The individually-prescribed weekly exercise was ≥150-minutes of moderate-intensity exercise, including two resistance-training sessions. The intervention was deemed "safe" if exercise-related, serious adverse events (SAE) were experienced by <10% of participants, and feasible if recruitment, retention, and adherence rates were ≥75%, and ≥75% compliance rates were achieved in ≥75% of weeks. Patient-reported and objectively-measured outcomes were assessed at baseline, mid-intervention, end-intervention, and 6-month follow-up, using generalized estimating equations.

Twelve participants enrolled (51 ± 19.5 years, 5 females). There were no exercise-related SAEs. The intervention was feasible (recruitment:80%, retention:92%, adherence:83%). Participants completed a median of 172.8 (min:77.5, max:560.8) minutes of physical activity per week. 17% met the compliance outcome threshold for ≥75% of the intervention. Improvements in quality of life (mean change (95% CI): 7.9 units (1.9, 13.8)), functional well-being (4.3 units (1.4, 7.2)), depression (-2.0 units (-3.8, -0.2)), activity (112.8 min (42.1, 183.4)), fitness (56.4 meters (20.4, 92.5)), balance (4.9 s (0.9, 9.0)), and lower-body strength (15.2 kg (9.3, 21.1)) were observed end-intervention.

Preliminary evidence support that exercise is safe and beneficial to the quality of life and functional outcomes for people with brain cancer.Registration: ACTRN12617001577303.

Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) is often impaired in lung cancer survivors. To inform personalized survivorship care, we identified associations between HR-QoL scores and patient-, tumor-, and treatment-factors over time.

We evaluated HR-QoL scores provided at diagnosis, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years from the Yale Lung Cancer Biorepository. HR-QoL was measured via the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung (FACT-L) instrument and available for a subset of patients (n = 513). Analyses were stratified by early-stage (I-II; n = 355) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), advanced stage NSCLC (III-IV; n = 158), and small cell lung cancer (SCLC, n = 21). We used mixed effects modeling and multivariable analysis with covariate adjustment to examine changes in FACT-L from diagnosis to follow-up. Sensitivity analysis was performed including patients with early-stage disease and complete FACT-L scores at both baseline and year 2 (n = 91).

The average FACT-L scores at diagnosis in early-stage NSCLC, advanced stage NSCLC, and SCLC were 121.0 (standard deviation (SD) 11.4), 109.2 (18.7), and 98.7 (20.2) respectively. At all timepoints, HR-QoL was higher in patients with early-stage NSCLC (vs advanced-stage disease). In patients with early- and advanced-stage NSCLC, HR-QoL was higher at years 1 and 2 than at diagnosis, though the changes did not meet clinical significance. At NSCLC diagnosis, higher HR-QoL was associated with older age, better performance status, participating in physical activity, adenocarcinoma histology, and (in advanced stage NSCLC) anticipated treatment with chemotherapy. At NSCLC follow-up, HR-QoL was higher in patients with higher BMI and better performance status.

In patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC, HR-QoL scores are impacted by patient factors, tumor factors, and treatment factors. HR-QoL is higher in patients with early-stage disease. In patients surviving 2 years, HR-QoL was higher at follow-up, though the change did not meet clinical significance. To optimize HR-QoL, lung cancer survivorship teams should prioritize comorbidity management, physical activity, healthy weight maintenance, and treatment-related side effects.

Although rural residence has been related to health disparities in cancer patients, little is known about how rural residence impacts mental health and quality of life (QOL) in ovarian cancer patients over time. This prospective longitudinal study investigated mental health and QOL of ovarian cancer patients in the first-year post-diagnosis.

Women with suspected ovarian cancer completed psychosocial surveys pre-surgery, at 6 months and one-year; clinical data were obtained from medical records. Histologically confirmed high grade epithelial ovarian cancer patients were eligible. Rural/urban residence was categorized from patient counties using the USDA Rural-Urban Continuum Codes. Linear mixed effects models examined differences in psychosocial measures over time, adjusting for covariates.

Although disparities were not observed at study entry for any psychosocial variable (all p-values >0.22), urban patients showed greater improvement in total distress over the year following diagnosis than rural patients (p = 0.025) and were significantly less distressed at one year (p = 0.03). Urban patients had a more consistent QOL improvement than their rural counterparts (p = 0.006). There were no differences in the course of depressive symptoms over the year (p = 0.17). Social support of urban patients at 12 months was significantly higher than that of rural patients (p = 0.04).

Rural patients reported less improvement in psychological functioning in the year following diagnosis than their urban counterparts. Clinicians should be aware of rurality as a potential risk factor for ongoing distress. Future studies should examine causes of these health disparities and potential long-term inequities and develop interventions to address these issues.

Two million people in the UK are living with or beyond cancer and a third of them report poor quality of life (QoL) due to problems such as fatigue, fear of cancer recurrence, and concerns about returning to work. We aimed to develop and evaluate an intervention based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), suited to address the concerns of cancer survivors and in improving their QoL. We also recognise the importance of exercise and vocational activity on QoL and therefore will integrate options for physical activity and return to work/vocational support, thus ACT Plus (+).

We will conduct a multi-centre, pragmatic, theory driven, randomised controlled trial. We will assess whether ACT+ including usual aftercare (intervention) is more effective and cost-effective than usual aftercare alone (control). The primary outcome is QoL of participants living with or beyond cancer measured using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General scale (FACT-G) at 52 weeks. We will recruit 344 participants identified from secondary care sites who have completed hospital-based treatment for cancer with curative intent, with low QoL (determined by the FACT-G) and randomise with an allocation ratio of 1:1 to the intervention or control. The intervention (ACT+) will be delivered by NHS Talking Therapies, specialist services, and cancer charities. The intervention consists of up to eight sessions at weekly or fortnightly intervals using different modalities of delivery to suit individual needs, i.e. face-to-face sessions, over the phone or skype.

To date, there have been no robust trials reporting both clinical and cost-effectiveness of an ACT based intervention for people with low QoL after curative cancer treatment in the UK. We will provide high quality evidence of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of adding ACT+ to usual aftercare provided by the NHS. If shown to be effective and cost-effective then commissioners, providers and cancer charities will know how to improve QoL in cancer survivors and their families.

ISRCTN: ISRCTN67900293 . Registered on 09 December 2019. All items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set for this protocol can be found in Additional file 2 Table S1.

Malnutrition is a common and distressing condition among pancreatic cancer patients. Fewer than a quarter of pancreatic cancer patients receive medical nutrition therapy (MNT), important for improving nutritional status, weight maintenance, quality of life and survival. System, provider, and patient level barriers limit access to MNT. We propose to examine the feasibility of a 12-week multi-level, digital health intervention designed to expand MNT access among pancreatic cancer patients.

Individuals with advanced pancreatic cancer starting chemotherapy (N = 80) will be 1:1 randomized to the intervention or usual care. The Support Through Remote Observation and Nutrition Guidance (STRONG) intervention includes system-level (e.g., routine malnutrition and screening), provider-level (e.g., dietitian training and web-based dashboard), and patient-level strategies (e.g., individualized nutrition plan, self-monitoring of dietary intake via Fitbit, ongoing goal monitoring and feedback). Individuals receiving usual care will be referred to dietitians based on their oncologists' discretion. Study assessments will be completed at baseline, 4-, 8-, 12-, and 16-weeks.

Primary outcomes will be feasibility (e.g., recruitment, retention, assessment completion) and acceptability. We will collect additional implementation outcomes, such as intervention adherence, perceived usability, and feedback on intervention quality via an exit interview. We will collect preliminary data on outcomes that may be associated with the intervention including malnutrition, quality of life, treatment outcomes, and survival.

This study will advance our knowledge on the feasibility of a digital health intervention to reduce malnutrition among individuals with advanced pancreatic cancer. Trial registration: NCT05675059, registered on December 9, 2022.

Sleep disturbances represent a modifiable target to improve quality of life and longer-term outcomes in cancer survivors. However, the association between sleep health and overall quality of life in African American cancer survivors has been poorly assessed, a population at increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

Seven hundred and eighteen Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) cohort participants completed a supplemental sleep survey at the time of enrollment, which included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Linear and logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between sleep and mental health, while block regression models were used to estimate the contribution of clustered factors to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL).

Nearly 60% of the cohort reported symptoms indicative of poor sleep quality on the PSQI, 15% reported excessive daytime sleepiness on the ESS, and 12% reported moderate to severe insomnia on the ISI. Survivors with elevated ISI scores reported FACT-G scores that were 17 points lower than those without symptoms of insomnia (95% CI: - 13.1, - 21.2). Poor sleep health accounted for the largest proportion of variability in FACT-G scores (R2 = 0.27) and change in R2 value (0.18) when compared to comorbidities, health behaviors, cancer-related factors, and demographics.

Overall sleep health was significantly associated with poorer HRQOL and variability in FACT-G scores. Additional studies investigating a causal relationship between sleep and HRQOL are needed to determine whether sleep quality could affect disparities in cancer outcomes.

Addressing sleep quality in cancer survivors may improve long-term health and HRQOL.

Breast cancer is responsible for disruptive changes in women's lives, causing them to experience diverse and intense negative emotions that can affect their perception of well-being. The present study aimed to characterize difficulties in emotion regulation (ER), according to Gratz and Roemer's multidimensional assessment, in women with breast cancer and to relate them with General Well-Being and its different domains: Physical, Social/Familial, Emotional, and Functional.

Ninety-five Portuguese women with breast cancer aged between 32 and 75 years answered a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire and the Portuguese versions of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General. Data were collected in an oncology public hospital.

In general, difficulties in ER presented negative correlations with General Well-Being and its domains. The multiple regression analysis findings indicated that two specific types of difficulties, Limited Access to ER Strategies and Lack of Emotional Clarity, play a significant role in predicting well-being, especially in the Emotional domain, which was most compromised in these patients.

These difficulties should be approached within psycho-oncological interventions as they are essential contributors to improving emotional and general well-being and fostering psychological adaptation to breast cancer.