1
|
Lauridsen KB, Duch KS, Mortensen AS, Cordtz R, Kristensen S, Lund ML, Dreyer LW. Sex differences in treatment response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a cohort study from the DANBIO registry. Scand J Rheumatol 2025:1-11. [PMID: 40110625 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2025.2471713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2025] [Indexed: 03/22/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to investigate associations between sex and treatment response and persistence in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating their first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi). METHOD This Danish nationwide cohort study included RA-patients starting their first TNFi treatment between 2006 and 2022. Overall and age-specific treatment response was compared across sexes at 4 and 12 months. Treatment persistence was investigated using survival analysis. RESULTS In total, 7789 RA-patients were identified; 75% were females. Females had slightly smaller ∆DAS28-CRP compared to males after 12 months, mainly due to less reduction of swollen joint count (SJC) and CRP. At 12 months the crude proportion of males with good response was higher (62%) than in females (55%), adjusted RR 1.14 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06; 1.23). The adjusted hazard ratio for treatment termination within first year was 0.82 (95% CI 0.73; 0.92) in males versus females. The median treatment persistence for individuals aged <50 years was 1.6 years (95% CI 1.4; 1.8) in females and 3.2 years (95% CI 2.6; 4.0) in males. The same difference was not seen in patients aged > 50 years. CONCLUSION Despite similar baseline disease activity, females had a lower chance than males of achieving good response 4 and 12 months after starting treatment with first TNFi. The sex difference in DAS28-CRP improvement is caused by a greater decrease in CRP and SJC among males. Further, females had an increased risk of discontinuation, especially among patients aged < 50 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K B Lauridsen
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - K S Duch
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Research Data and Biostatistics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - A S Mortensen
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - R Cordtz
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - S Kristensen
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - M L Lund
- Copenhagen Centre for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Centre for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L W Dreyer
- Centre of Rheumatic Research Aalborg (CERRA), Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- The DANBIO Registry, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tichý Š, Nekvindová L, Baranová J, Vencovský J, Pavelka K, Horák P, Závada J. Drug survival analysis of etanercept compared with monoclonal antibody tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis: a propensity score-matched analysis from the Czech ATTRA registry. Scand J Rheumatol 2025; 54:79-86. [PMID: 39105330 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2024.2381746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/15/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the drug survival of etanercept to monoclonal tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. METHODS Patients initiating first line biological therapy with tumour necrosis factor-α were propensity score matched and compared for drug survival with a Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS We matched 657 to 657 patients in rheumatoid arthritis, the median survival time on etanercept was 44.6 months vs. 36.8 months on monoclonal antibody tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors, with a hazard ratio of 0.94, p = 0.416 We matched 187 to 356 patients in ankylosing spondylitis, the median survival time on etanercept was 75.1 compared to 68.0 months, hazard ratio of 0.78, p = 0.087 We matched 81 to 160 psoriatic arthritis patients, the median survival time on etanercept was 35.8. compared to 65.7 months, hazard ratio 1.61, p = 0.011. Patients treated with etanercept had significantly worse psoriasis scoring during follow up. CONCLUSIONS We found comparable survival in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. In psoriatic arthritis, we found significantly shorter survival on etanercept, possibly due to worse response of skin and nail manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Š Tichý
- Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Nekvindová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
| | - J Baranová
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses Ltd., Brno, Czech Republic
| | - J Vencovský
- Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - K Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - P Horák
- Third Department of Internal Medicine - Nephrology, Rheumatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - J Závada
- Institute of Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hurtubise R, Rohekar S, Haroon N, Baskurt Z, Chim T, Zummer M, Inman RD, Richard N. Impact of disease manifestations on first biologic drug survival in axial spondyloarthritis: a real-life Canadian study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2025; 9:rkaf004. [PMID: 39886539 PMCID: PMC11780884 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkaf004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2024] [Accepted: 12/22/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2025] Open
Abstract
Objectives The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of extramusculoskeletal manifestations (EMMs) and peripheral musculoskeletal features on first biologic drug survival in subjects with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). The secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of reasons for treatment discontinuation. Methods A total of 593 axSpA patients from the SpondyloArthritis Research Consortium of Canada initiating a first biologic drug were identified between 2003 and 2023. Drug survival was presented using Kaplan-Meier curves for each disease manifestation and compared using the logrank test. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse independent predictors of discontinuation. The impact of reasons for treatment discontinuation was assessed using a competing risk analysis. Results The presence of psoriasis, nail psoriasis, dactylitis, at least one EMM or at least one peripheral musculoskeletal manifestation was associated with prolonged drug survival compared with subjects without these disease manifestations. In multivariable analysis, psoriasis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.53 (95% CI 0.33, 0.86)] and at least one peripheral musculoskeletal manifestation [HR 0.65 (95% CI 0.47, 0.92)] were independently associated with a lower risk for biologic discontinuation. The presence of psoriasis or dactylitis was associated with reduced treatment discontinuation in patients who stopped their biologic medication for ineffectiveness but not when treatment was discontinued due to adverse events. Conclusions This study showed that the presence of some axSpA disease manifestations were associated with prolonged biologic drug survival. Psoriasis and peripheral musculoskeletal manifestations were the most significant predictors of treatment retention. Future research will be needed to further refine treatment strategies according to specific disease manifestations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raphaël Hurtubise
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sherry Rohekar
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Nigil Haroon
- Division of Rheumatology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zeynep Baskurt
- Division of Rheumatology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tina Chim
- Division of Rheumatology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michel Zummer
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Rheumatology, Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Robert D Inman
- Division of Rheumatology, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nicolas Richard
- Department of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Division of Rheumatology, Hôpital Maisonneuve Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ørnbjerg LM, Georgiadis S, Kvien TK, Michelsen B, Rasmussen S, Pavelka K, Zavada J, Loft AG, Kenar G, Solmaz D, Glintborg B, Rodrigues A, Santos MJ, Di Guiseppe D, Wallman JK, Ciurea A, Nissen MJ, Rotar Z, Pirkmajer KP, Nordström D, Hokkanen AM, Gudbjornsson B, Palsson O, Hetland ML, Østergaard M. Impact of patient characteristics on ASDAS disease activity state cut-offs in axial spondyloarthritis: results from nine European rheumatology registries. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004644. [PMID: 39489531 PMCID: PMC11535712 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2024-004644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Accepted: 10/04/2024] [Indexed: 11/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To re-evaluate cut-offs for disease activity states according to the Axial Spondyloarthritis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), and study the impact of sex, age, calendar time, disease and symptom duration on ASDAS and ASDAS cut-offs in a large contemporary cohort. METHODS Data from 2939 patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) starting their first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor in nine European registries were pooled and analysed. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed to identify cut-offs against external criteria. Six-month data including patient and physician global assessments, both ≤1 (0-10 integer scale), and Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society partial remission were used for separation of inactive disease (ID) from low disease activity (LDA), while patient and physician global ≤3 were applied as external criteria to separate LDA from high disease activity (HDA). Patient and physician global ≥6 were applied to separate HDA from very high disease activity in baseline data. RESULTS The three ASDAS cut-offs identified to separate the four disease activity states in the overall patient population were <1.3, <2.0 and >3.5. Cut-offs for ID and LDA in women were higher (<1.5 and <2.0, respectively) than in men (<1.3 and <1.9), as were cut-offs in patients ≥45 years (<1.5 and <2.2) versus ≤34 years (<1.2 and <1.9) and 35-44 years (<1.3 and <1.8). Cut-offs were independent of calendar time and disease duration. CONCLUSIONS Re-evaluation of ASDAS cut-offs for disease activity states in a large multi-national axSpA cohort resulted in cut-offs similar to those currently endorsed. Differences in cut-offs between sex and age groups for ID and LDA were observed, but the differences were minor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lykke M Ørnbjerg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Stylianos Georgiadis
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tore K Kvien
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brigitte Michelsen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Center for Treatment of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases (REMEDY), Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Research Unit, Sørlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Simon Rasmussen
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Karel Pavelka
- Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Jakub Zavada
- Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Rheumatology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Gokce Kenar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Dokuz Eylul University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Dilek Solmaz
- Izmir Katip Celebi University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Izmir Ataturk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Bente Glintborg
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- The DANBIO registry, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ana Rodrigues
- Rheumatology Unit, Hospital dos Lusíadas, Lisbon, Portugal
- Reuma.pt, Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal
- EpiDoC unit, CEDOC, Nova Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Maria Jose Santos
- Reuma.pt, Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto Medicina Molecular, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Centro Académico de Medicina de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - Daniela Di Guiseppe
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicin Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan K Wallman
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Adrian Ciurea
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael J Nissen
- Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ziga Rotar
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Katja Perdan Pirkmajer
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Dan Nordström
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna Mari Hokkanen
- Departments of Medicine and Rheumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Olafur Palsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Østergaard
- Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Freites-Nuñez D, Leon L, Toledano E, Candelas G, Martinez C, Rodriguez-Laguna M, Rubio D, Fernandez-Gutierrez B, Abasolo L. Switching related to inefficacy in biologics and targeted synthetic therapies for psoriatic arthritis: a comparative real-life study. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2024; 16:1759720X241273083. [PMID: 39219744 PMCID: PMC11366104 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x241273083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Switching between therapies is a recommended strategy for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients who experience treatment failure; however, studies including real-life data are scarce. Objectives To assess the incidence rate (IR) of switching between biologics and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) due to inefficacy in PsA, and to compare the risk of switching due to inefficacy across different b/tsDMARDs groups. Design A longitudinal retrospective study, spanning from 2007 to 2022, was conducted on patients with PsA treated with b/tsDMARDs at an outpatient rheumatology clinic. Methods The primary outcome was switching between b/tsDMARDs due to inefficacy. The independent variable was the exposure to b/tsDMARDs during follow-up. As covariates, clinical, treatment-related, and sociodemographic variables were considered. Survival techniques were run to estimate the IR of switching due to inefficacy per 100 patients*year and confidence interval at 95% (95% CI). Cox multivariate regression analyses were run to assess the risk of b/tsDMARDs switching due to inefficacy, expressed as hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. Results In all, 141 patients were included, with 893.09 patients*year follow-ups. 52.48% of them were females in their fifties. In total, 262 courses of treatment were recorded. During the study period, 56 patients presented 121 switches and 103 related to inefficacy (IR: 11.53 (9.51-13.98)). Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi) showed the lowest IR. In the bivariate analysis, all b/tsDMARDs had more risk of switching compared to TNFi (HR: anti-lL-17 vs TNFi: 2.26 (1.17-4.36); others vs TNFi: 3.21 (1.59-6.45)); however, this statistical significance was no longer present in the multivariate analysis once adjustments were made for the covariates. Still, the final model achieved statistical significance in the following variables: gender, clinical symptoms, prescription year, therapy courses, glucocorticoids, and sulfasalazine. Conclusion In this study, we did not find differences in the rate of switching due to inefficacy among different groups of b/tsDMARDs. Other concomitant treatments, sociodemographic, and clinical variables were identified as risk factors for switching due to inefficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Leticia Leon
- Leon Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
- Faculty of Health Sciences - HM Hospitals, University Camilo José Cela, Calle Martín Lagos, s/n. Madrid 28040, Spain
| | - Esther Toledano
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gloria Candelas
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - Cristina Martinez
- Rheumatology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Daniel Rubio
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Benjamin Fernandez-Gutierrez
- Medicine Department, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lydia Abasolo
- Musculoskeletal Pathology Group, Rheumatology Department, IdISSC, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Larid G, Baudens G, Tiemdjo-Djimaffo G, Coquerelle P, Goeb V, Guyot MH, Marguerie L, Maury F, Veillard E, Houvenagel E, Salmon JH, Flipo RM, Gervais E. Retention rate of subcutaneous TNF inhibitors in axial spondyloarthritis in a multicentre study from the RIC-FRANCE network. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1374. [PMID: 38228719 PMCID: PMC10791989 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52016-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The objectives of our study were to assess retention rate, safety, and predictive factors for retention of subcutaneous (SC) TNF inhibitors (TNFi) (adalimumab (ADA), etanercept (ETN), golimumab (GOL), and certolizumab pegol (CZP)) in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) depending on the line of treatment in real-life conditions. A multicentre retrospective observational study was conducted including 552 patients fulfilling the ASAS criteria for axSpA followed in the RIC-France register who began SC-TNFi between 01/01/13 and 08/31/2018 for a total of 824 prescriptions. Taking all lines of treatment into account, GOL had a significantly higher retention rate compared with ADA, ETN, and CZP with a mean retention length of 59 months. As first-line bDMARDs, GOL had a significantly higher retention rate compared with ADA and ETN. ETN had the best retention rate when prescribed as at least 3rd bDMARD. Taking all lines of treatment into account, female sex, peripheral disease, BASDAI at initiation, and line of treatment were predictive factors for treatment cessation. Primary inefficiency was the most frequent reason for treatment cessation. In conclusion, GOL showed the highest retention rate in axSpA. Male sex, absence of peripheral disease, and early line of prescription were associated with better SC-TNFi retention in axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Larid
- LITEC, Université de Poitiers, CHU Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France.
| | | | | | | | - Vincent Goeb
- University Hospital of Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Elisabeth Gervais
- LITEC, Université de Poitiers, CHU Poitiers, 86000, Poitiers, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dalén J, Svedbom A, Hernlund E, Olofsson T, Black CM. Identifying Predictors of First-Line Subcutaneous TNF-Inhibitor Persistence in Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis: A Decision Tree Analysis by Indication. Adv Ther 2023; 40:4657-4674. [PMID: 37599341 PMCID: PMC10499966 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02600-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Treatment persistence is a proxy for efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction, and a switch in treatment or treatment discontinuation has been associated with increased indirect and direct costs in inflammatory arthritis (IA). Hence, there are both clinical and economic incentives for the identification of factors associated with treatment persistence. Until now, studies have mainly leveraged traditional regression analysis, but it has been suggested that novel approaches, such as statistical learning techniques, may improve our understanding of factors related to treatment persistence. Therefore, we set up a study using nationwide Swedish high-coverage administrative register data with the objective to identify patient groups with distinct persistence of subcutaneous tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (SC-TNFi) treatment in IA, using recursive partitioning, a statistical learning algorithm. METHODS IA was defined as a diagnosis of rheumatic arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis/unspecified spondyloarthritis (AS/uSpA) or psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Adult swedish biologic-naïve patients with IA initiating biologic treatment with a SC-TNFi (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab or golimumab) between May 6, 2010, and December 31, 2017. Treatment persistence of SC-TNFi was derived based on prescription data and a defined standard daily dose. Patient characteristics, including age, sex, number of health care contacts, comorbidities and treatment, were collected at treatment initiation and 12 months before treatment initiation. Based on these characteristics, we used recursive partitioning in a conditional inference framework to identify patient groups with distinct SC-TNFi treatment persistence by IA diagnosis. RESULTS A total of 13,913 patients were included. Approximately 50% had RA, while 27% and 23% had AS/uSpA and PsA, respectively. The recursive partitioning algorithm identified sex and treatment as factors associated with SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA. Time on treatment in the groups with the lowest treatment persistence was similar across all three indications (9.5-11.3 months), whereas there was more variation in time on treatment across the groups with the highest treatment persistence (18.4-48.9 months). CONCLUSIONS Women have low SC-TNFi treatment persistence in PsA and AS/uSpA whereas male sex and golimumab are associated with high treatment persistence in these indications. The factors associated with treatment persistence in RA were less distinct but may comprise disease activity and concurrent conventional systemic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Tor Olofsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Rheumatology, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Christopher M Black
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence (CORE), Merck & Co., Inc, 126 East Lincoln Ave., Rahway, NJ, 07065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sexual dimorphism in the prevalence, manifestation and outcomes of axial spondyloarthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2022; 18:657-669. [PMID: 36109666 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-022-00833-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
9
|
Predictors of ASDAS-CRP inactive disease in axial spondyloarthritis during treatment with TNF-inhibitors: Data from the EuroSpA collaboration. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2022; 56:152081. [PMID: 35985172 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2022.152081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) initiating their first tumor necrosis factor alpha-inhibitor (TNFi), we aimed to identify common baseline predictors of Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS-CRP) inactive disease (primary objective) and clinically important improvement (CII) at 6 months, and drug retention at 12-months across 15 European registries. METHODS Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. Outcomes were investigated per registry and in pooled data using logistic regression analyses on multiply imputed data. RESULTS The consistency of baseline predictors in individual registries justified pooling the data. In the pooled dataset (n = 21,196), the 6-month rates for ASDAS inactive disease and ASDAS CII were 26% and 51%, and the 12-month drug retention rate 65% in patients with available data (n = 9,845, n = 6,948 and n = 21,196, respectively). Nine common baseline predictors of ASDAS inactive disease, ASDAS CII and 12-month drug retention were identified, and the odds ratios (95%-confidence interval) for ASDAS inactive disease were: age, per year: 0.97 (0.97-0.98), men vs. women: 1.88 (1.60-2.22), current vs. non-smoking: 0.76 (0.63-0.91), HLA-B27 positive vs. negative: 1.51 (1.20-1.91), TNF start year 2015-2018 vs. 2009-2014: 1.24 (1.06-1.45), CRP>10 vs. ≤10 mg/l: 1.49 (1.25-1.77), one unit increase in health assessment questionnaire (HAQ): 0.77 (0.58-1.03), one-millimeter (mm) increase in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) fatigue and spinal pain: 0.99 (0.99-1.00) and 0.99 (0.99-1.99), respectively CONCLUSION: Common baseline predictors of treatment response and adherence to TNFi could be identified across data from 15 European registries, indicating that they may be universal across different axSpA populations.
Collapse
|
10
|
Gavigan K, Nowell WB, Hunter T, Curtis JR, Malatestinic WN, Bolce RJ, Lisse JR, Walsh J. Employment, Work Productivity, and Biologic Treatments in Self-Reported Axial Spondyloarthritis: a Cross-Sectional Study in a Female Predominant Population from the ArthritisPower Registry. Rheumatol Ther 2022; 9:663-677. [PMID: 35191010 PMCID: PMC8964841 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00428-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to characterize employment, work productivity, and biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) treatment in a predominantly female population of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients in a real-world setting. METHODS This was a cross-sectional study of axSpA participants within the ArthritisPower registry. Outcomes were assessed with surveys (Work Productivity and Activity Impairment [WPAI], Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [BASDAI], and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments) and compared between subgroups (employed vs. not employed; taking vs. not taking a bDMARD). RESULTS Among the 195 participants, 117 (60.0%) were employed and 78 (40.0%) were not employed entirely or partially due to axSpA. The mean age of the participants was 47.6 years and 86.7% were female. Current bDMARD use was reported by 57.4% of those surveyed (59.8% employed vs. 53.9% not employed; p = 0.408). Compared to not employed participants, employed participants had more favorable disease activity (BASDAI 6.0 vs. 7.6; p < 0.001) and overall health (self-rated health 2.5 vs. 1.8; p < 0.001). Employed participants, compared to not employed participants, were diagnosed at an earlier age (36.0 vs. 42.5 years, respectively) and experienced a shorter time between symptom onset and diagnosis (9.5 vs. 13.6 years, respectively). Employed participants reported missing on average 6.5 days of work and experienced a 52.7% impairment on work productivity due to axSpA over a 3-month period. Absenteeism and presenteeism were statistically similar between participants taking a bDMARD versus those not taking a bDMARD. CONCLUSIONS Although bDMARD treatment rates were similar between employed and not employed participants, disease activity and overall health were better in employed than non-employed participants. Employed participants experienced substantial work productivity impairment due to axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly Gavigan
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, 515 N Midland Ave, Upper Nyack, NY, 10960, USA.
| | - W Benjamin Nowell
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, 515 N Midland Ave, Upper Nyack, NY, 10960, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hwang MC, Rozycki M, Kauffman D, Arndt T, Yi E, Weisman MH. Does Gender Impact a Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis? ACR Open Rheumatol 2022; 4:540-546. [PMID: 35352497 PMCID: PMC9190217 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The study objective was to explore differences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) diagnosis experiences between men and women by examining the coding of health events over the 2 years preceding AS diagnosis. Methods Claims data (January 2006–April 2019) from the MarketScan databases were examined. Patients who had received two or more AS diagnoses at least 30 days apart and had at least 2 years of insurance enrollment before their first AS diagnosis were analyzed. Men were matched 1:1 to women by age, diagnosis date, insurance type, and enrollment duration. Health events (diagnosis and provider codes) were examined over 2 years before AS diagnosis and stratified by gender. Data were analyzed using univariate χ2 tests. Results Among 7744 patients, 274 of 1906 AS‐related codes showed statistically significant differences between men and women. Women received more diagnosis codes than men across diagnoses and providers; the largest difference in diagnosis codes among women versus men was in peripheral symptom coding (57.7% vs. 43.9%, respectively). More women than men received diagnosis codes for depression (21.2% vs. 9.8%) and other musculoskeletal symptoms (52.8% vs. 40.0%); only gout was more common in men (6.5%) than in women (2.2%). Among men, backache codes gradually increased 12 months before AS diagnosis, whereas axial and sacroiliitis coding increased sharply immediately before diagnosis. The greatest difference in physician types visited was for rheumatologists: 64.2% of women had visits compared with 45.1% of men. Conclusion Further investigation into the dissimilarities in diagnostic experiences between men and women is needed to determine whether differences are due to disease phenotype or potential cognitive bias influencing diagnostic decision‐making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark C Hwang
- McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
| | | | | | | | - Esther Yi
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cassinotti A, Batticciotto A, Parravicini M, Lombardo M, Radice P, Cortelezzi CC, Segato S, Zanzi F, Cappelli A, Segato S. Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221085889. [PMID: 35340755 PMCID: PMC8949794 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221085889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use. METHODS Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy. RESULTS The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase. DISCUSSION Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX. CONCLUSION MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Radice
- Ophtalmology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | | | - Simone Segato
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | - Sergio Segato
- Gastroenterology Unit, ASST Sette Laghi, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Focus on Sex and Gender: What We Need to Know in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12030499. [PMID: 35330498 PMCID: PMC8948892 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12030499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting mostly women with a female/male ratio of 3:1. It is characterized by symmetrical polyarthritis, leading to progressive joint damage. Sex differences have been reported in terms of disease course and characteristics, influencing patients reported outcome measures (PROMs) and pain perception, ultimately leading to male–female disparities in treatment response. Notwithstanding, sex and gender discrepancies are still under-reported in clinical trials. Therefore, there is a consistent need for a precise reference of sex and gender issues in RA studies to improve treat-to-target achievement. This narrative review explores the above-mentioned aspects of RA disease, discussing the latest core principles of RA recommendations, from safety issues to early arthritis concept and management, treat-to-target and difficult-to-treat notions, up to the most recent debate on vaccination. Our final purpose is to evaluate how sex and gender can impact current management guidelines and how this issue can be integrated for effective disease control.
Collapse
|
14
|
Ye L, Zhou L, Bian J, Zhao J, Li T, Wu X, Xu H. Disease Activity-Guided Stepwise Tapering but Not Discontinuation of Biologics Is a Feasible Therapeutic Strategy for Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Real-World Evidence. Adv Ther 2022; 39:1393-1402. [PMID: 35106691 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01995-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To analyze the history of biologics usage in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in China and to evaluate the impact of drug reduction and withdrawal on disease activity. METHODS Drug administration intervals and disease activity indexes in patients with AS who regularly used etanercept (ETN) biosimilars for more than 1 year and those who withdrew the drugs during the same period in a single center were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS A total of 108 patients with AS who used ETN biosimilars for more than a year were recruited in this study for analysis. (1) Overall, 98.1% patients with AS increased the intervals between drug administrations, averaging from 4.57 ± 0.15 days during 0-3 months to 8.53 ± 0.43 days during 3-6 months, and to 10.49 ± 0.39 days during 6-12 months. Compared with the baseline parameters, after 3-month and 12-month treatments disease activities were improved significantly, including Patient Global Assessment (PTGA), overall back pain, nocturnal pain, fatigue, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (ASDAS-CRP), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI). (2) Only 59.3% used ETN biosimilars with full dose (3.5 days' interval) in the first 3 months. At baseline, disease activities of these patients were higher than those with reduced dose (5.9 days' interval). However, at 12 months of drug administration there was no significant difference in the overall length of drug administration intervals and disease activities between the two groups. (3) Twenty patients with low disease activity (LDA) discontinued therapy spontaneously; after 3 months, 55% of them experienced disease recurrence (∆ASDAS ≥ 0.9). CONCLUSION Spontaneous dose reduction was a common phenomenon among patients with AS in China, which becomes more notable with increasing relief of symptoms. Most patients could maintain an LDA state after dose reduction. Compared with dose reduction, ETN biosimilar withdrawal was more likely to induce disease recurrence. Therefore, disease activity-guided individualized stepwise tapering may become one of the feasible therapeutic strategies for AS in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingying Ye
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Ling Zhou
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Jianye Bian
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Juan Zhao
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Ting Li
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China
| | - Huji Xu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, 200003, China.
- Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
- School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, rheumatic disease characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint, spine, and entheses. Axial spondyloarthritis affects up to 1.4% of adults in the United States and is associated with decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and substantial health care-related costs, imposing a high burden on patients, their caregivers, and society. SUMMARY OF WORK Diagnosing axSpA can be difficult. In this review, we seek to help rheumatologists in recognizing and diagnosing axSpA. MAJOR CONCLUSIONS A discussion of challenges associated with diagnosis is presented, including use and interpretation of imaging, reasons for diagnostic delays, differences in disease presentation by sex, and differential diagnoses of axSpA. FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS The early diagnosis of axSpA and advances in available therapeutic options have improved patient care and disease management, but delays in diagnosis and treatment remain common. Additional research and education are critical for recognizing diverse axSpA presentations and optimizing management early in the course of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A. Walsh
- From the University of Utah School of Medicine and Salt Lake City Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Marina Magrey
- The MetroHealth System and School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim SH, Kim HR, Lee SH, Shin K, Kim HA, Min HK. Effectiveness and drug retention of biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs in Korean patients with late onset ankylosing spondylitis. Sci Rep 2021; 11:21555. [PMID: 34732807 PMCID: PMC8566570 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01132-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The clinical data on the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) use in late-onset ankylosing spondylitis (LOAS) is limited. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the drug efficacy and retention rate of bDMARDs in LOAS and compare it to young-onset ankylosing spondylitis (YOAS). Data of patients with AS receiving bDMARDs were extracted from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics and Targeted Therapy registry. Patients whose age of onset was > 50 years and ≤ 50 years were classified as having LOAS and YOAS, respectively. Their baseline characteristics and disease-associated parameters were evaluated. Drug efficacy [Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS)-clinically important improvement (CII), ASDAS-major improvement (MI), Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) 20, and ASAS 40] at 1-year follow-up and drug retention rates were assessed. A total of 1708 patients (comprising 1472 patients with YOAS and 236 patients with LOAS) were included in this analysis. The LOAS group had a lower prevalence among males, lower HLA-B27 positivity and a higher prevalence of peripheral arthritis. Patients with LOAS were more likely to have higher disease-associated parameters (inflammatory reactants, patient global assessment, ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and ASDAS-C-reactive protein). LOAS was negatively associated with achieving ASDAS-CII, ASAS 20, and ASAS 40. The drug retention rate was lower in LOAS; however, the propensity score-matched and covariate-adjusted hazard ratios for bDMARD discontinuation were comparable to YOAS. There were no differences in the drug retention rates based on the type of bDMARD used in LOAS. Inferior clinical efficacy and shorter drug retention time were found in patients with LOAS receiving bDMARDs using real-world nationwide data. There were no differences among each bDMARD type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Hee Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120-1 Neungdong-ro (Hwayang-dong), Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae-Rim Kim
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Heon Lee
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kichul Shin
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyoun-Ah Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hong Ki Min
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, 120-1 Neungdong-ro (Hwayang-dong), Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, 05029, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
A Pooled Analysis Reporting the Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatol Ther 2021; 8:1775-1787. [PMID: 34618347 PMCID: PMC8572254 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-021-00380-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Despite of higher disease burden, lower efficacy to biologics has been reported in female compared to male patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of secukinumab by sex in patients with active AS from five phase 3 studies (MEASURE 1–5) through 52 weeks. Methods Baseline demographics, disease characteristics and efficacy outcomes at Weeks 16 and 52 were summarized for males versus females. Baseline predictor analysis used multivariable logistic regression for binary outcome measures or generalized linear model for continuous outcome measures to assess the impact of sex as one of the independent variables on selected efficacy outcomes at Week 52. Results Overall, 1031 males and 396 females were included in this analysis. Smoking status, hs-CRP, prior exposure to TNF inhibitors, BASMI occiput-to-wall and tragus-to-wall distance (cm) were higher in males, whereas MASES was higher in females. Efficacy outcomes i.e., ASAS40 responses and BASDAI change from baseline at Weeks 16 and 52 were generally comparable between males and females. Response rates were found to be significantly higher in male patients when compared with female patients only for ASDAS-CRP inactive disease (ID) at Week 52. Conclusion Comparable efficacy and safety outcomes were observed between male and female patients with active AS treated with secukinumab over 52 weeks. Further, sex was not an independent predictor of treatment response to secukinumab as assessed by ASAS40 responder rates and BASDAI change from baseline; association of ASDAS-CRP ID responder rates with sex warrants further exploration. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01358175, NCT01649375, NCT02008916, NCT02159053, and NCT02896127. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40744-021-00380-2.
Collapse
|
18
|
Predictive factors for switching in patients with psoriatic arthritis undergoing anti-TNFα, anti-IL12/23, or anti-IL17 drugs: a 15-year monocentric real-life study. Clin Rheumatol 2021; 40:4569-4580. [PMID: 34136971 PMCID: PMC8519923 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-021-05799-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to evaluate the (a) potential predictors of first biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) failure and (b) factors associated with failure of multiple therapies in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). MATERIALS AND METHODS We enrolled consecutive PsA patients attending our unit and undergoing bDMARDs during 2004-2020. Disease characteristics, previous/ongoing treatments, comorbidities, and follow-up duration were recorded. Disease activity and functional and clinimetric scores were recorded at baseline and yearly and were compared between switchers and non-switchers, and within switchers according to the reasons for switching. Effectiveness was evaluated over time with descriptive statistics; multivariate Cox and logistic regression models were used to evaluate predictors of response and failure of multiple bDMARDs. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to assess differences in time-to-first bDMARD discontinuation. Infections and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-four patients were included (117 (44.32%) females, mean age 56 years, mean PsA duration 15 years); 117 (44.32%) switched bDMARDs at least once. Switchers were mostly females, with higher Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and worse Health Assessment Questionnaire at baseline. Mean time-to-first bDMARD discontinuation was 72 months; 2-year and 5-year retention rates were 75% and 60%, respectively. Survival curves for anti-TNFα/anti-IL12/23/anti-IL17 were similar (p = 0.66). Main reasons for switching were inefficacy (67.52%) and adverse events (25.7%). Female sex was associated with a higher risk of first bDMARD discontinuation (HR = 2.39; 95% CI: 1.50-3.81) and failure of multiple bDMARDs (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 1.07-3.69); initiating therapy before 2015 was protective (HR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.73). CONCLUSIONS Survival rate was good for anti-TNFα and other bDMARDs. Female sex was a predictor of first bDMARD discontinuation, unlike mechanism of action, comorbidities, and BMI. Key Points • Drug survival in PsA patients was confirmed be greater for the first bDMARD administered. • In case of failure of the first bDMARD, switching/swapping proved a good treatment option, as reflected by a persistent satisfactory effectiveness with second-line bDMARDs and so subsequent switches. • Female sex may constitute a predisposing risk factor for flare and therapeutic switches. • Discontinuation or switching of biologics due to mechanism of action, comorbidities tolerability and BMI did not seem to impact first bDMARD withdrawal.
Collapse
|
19
|
Morin M, Hellgren K, Lindström U, Frisell T. Is family history a predictor of response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors in spondyloarthritis? A Swedish nationwide cohort study. Scand J Rheumatol 2021; 51:10-20. [PMID: 33755519 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2021.1887928] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether a family history of spondyloarthritis (SpA) is associated with clinical presentation at the start of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) treatment, or predictive of TNFi drug survival and treatment response in patients with SpA.Method: Family history of SpA in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and undifferentiated SpA (uSpA) from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality register starting a TNFi as their first biologic in 2006-2018 was assessed through national registers. Clinical characteristics at treatment start were compared by family history status. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios for drug discontinuation, and analysed treatment response at 3 and 12 months with linear regression. Multiple imputation was used to address missing data.Results: We included 9608 patients. Patients with family history had an earlier age at onset and longer disease duration at TNFi treatment start, but did not differ regarding disease activity and presence of SpA manifestations. Hazard ratios for drug discontinuation were 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89-1.31] for AS patients with a family history of AS, 1.02 (95% CI 0.89-1.18) for PsA patients with a family history of PsA, and 1.11 (95% CI 0.85-1.45) for uSpA patients with a family history of uSpA, after adjusting for demographic, socioeconomic, and SpA-related factors. Treatment response at 3 and 12 months was similar between groups.Conclusion: Family history of SpA was not found to be associated with clinical presentation at the start of TNFi treatment, nor was it associated with drug survival or treatment response in SpA patients starting a first TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Morin
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - K Hellgren
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Rheumatology, Theme Inflammation and Infection, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - U Lindström
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - T Frisell
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rusman T, van Bentum RE, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. Sex and gender differences in axial spondyloarthritis: myths and truths. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2021; 59:iv38-iv46. [PMID: 33053194 PMCID: PMC7566372 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Mounting evidence reveals evident sex differences in physiology, disease presentation and response to medication in axial SpA (axSpA). Unfortunately these data are often neglected in clinical practice and research. In this review, myths that still exist on diagnosis, disease manifestation and drug effectiveness were argued against data of the most recent literature. The aim is to increase awareness of sex differences in the clinical aspects of axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Rusman
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rianne E van Bentum
- Department of Rheumatology, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen HH, Chen YM, Lai KL, Hsieh TY, Hung WT, Lin CT, Tseng CW, Tang KT, Chou YY, Wu YD, Huang CY, Hsieh CW, Huang WN, Chen YH. Gender difference in ASAS HI among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235678. [PMID: 32645080 PMCID: PMC7347111 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the associations of the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society Health Index (ASAS HI) with gender and other factors in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods From November 2017 to October 2018, we measured the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spinal Score (mSASSS) and the ASAS HI score for AS patients at the Taichung Veterans General Hospital. After adjusting for disease activity (ASDAS-erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR], ASDAS- C-reactive protein [CRP], BASDAI+ESR or BASDAI+CRP), mSASSS and other potential confounders including medications, comorbidities, and laboratory data, any associations between gender and the sum score of ASDAS HI were assessed using multiple linear regression analysis, as well as any associations between gender and an ASAS HI score >5 using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 307 AS patients (62 [20.2%] females, mean age 46.4 years [S.D. 13.3], mean symptom duration 20.6 years [S.D. 12.1]) were included. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the male gender was significantly associated with a lower ASAS HI (B = -1. 91, 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.82–−1.00, p <0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that males also had a lower risk of achieving scores of ASAS HI > 5 than females (odds ratio = 0.15, 95% CI, 0.07–0.36, p <0.001). Disease activity measures, including ASDAS-ESR, ASDAS-CRP and BASDAI, had positive correlations with ASAS HI. Conclusion This single-center, cross-sectional study revealed that a higher ASAS HI score was significantly associated with female gender and higher disease activity measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Hua Chen
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Science and Rong-Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Public Health and Community Medicine Research Center, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (HHC); (YHC)
| | - Yi-Ming Chen
- Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Science and Rong-Hsing Research Center for Translational Medicine, Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Lung Lai
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Tsu-Yi Hsieh
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- PhD Program of Business, College of Business, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ting Hung
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Education, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Tsai Lin
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Tseng
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Tung Tang
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yin-Yi Chou
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Da Wu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chin-Yin Huang
- Department of Industrial Engineering and Enterprise Information, Tunghai University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Wei Hsieh
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Nan Huang
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Hsing Chen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (HHC); (YHC)
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wright GC, Kaine J, Deodhar A. Understanding differences between men and women with axial spondyloarthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2020; 50:687-694. [PMID: 32521322 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2020.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory immune-mediated disease resulting in inflammatory low back pain and other inflammatory manifestations in peripheral joints and entheses. AxSpA encompasses both ankylosing spondylitis (AS), in which patients present with definitive sacroiliitis visible on radiographic imaging, as well as nonradiographic axSpA (nr-axSpA), in which such changes may not be discernable. Emerging evidence suggests that women and men experience axSpA differently. Although the prevalence of AS is approximately 2- to 3- fold higher in men than in women, nr-axSpA occurs with roughly equal frequency in women and men. The goal of this review is to increase awareness of sex differences in axSpA by exploring the distinct manifestations of disease and disease characteristics in women, the overall clinical burden, recommendations for diagnosis, and potential treatment options. We summarize and contextualize the results of recent studies that illuminate sex differences in nr-axSpA and AS, including differences in disease manifestation and progression. It is important that sex differences in axSpA are understood and considered when diagnosing and treating the spectrum of axSpA, including AS and nr-axSpA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace C Wright
- Association of Women in Rheumatology, 345 E 37th Street, Suite 303C, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Jeffrey Kaine
- Independent Healthcare Associates, Inc, Cullowhee, NC, USA
| | - Atul Deodhar
- Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Immunotherapies are often used for the treatment, remission, and possible cure of autoimmune diseases, infectious diseases, and cancers. Empirical evidence illustrates that females and males differ in outcomes following the use of biologics for the treatment of autoimmune diseases, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis (RA), infectious diseases, e.g., influenza, and solid tumor cancers. Females tend to experience more adverse reactions than males following the use of a class of biologics referred to as immunotherapies. For immunotherapies aimed at stimulating an immune response, e.g., influenza vaccines, females develop greater responses and may experience greater efficacy than males. In contrast, for immunotherapies that repress an immune response, e.g., tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for RA or checkpoint inhibitors for melanoma, the efficacy is reportedly greater for males than females. Despite these differences, discrepancies in reporting differences between females and males exist, with females have been historically excluded from biomedical and clinical studies. There is a critical need for research that addresses the biological (i.e., sex) as well as sociocultural (i.e., gender) causes of male-female disparities in immunotherapy responses, toxicities, and outcomes. One-size-fits-all approaches to immunotherapies will not work, and sex/gender may contribute to variable treatment success, including adherence, in clinical settings.
Collapse
|
24
|
Yi E, Ahuja A, Rajput T, George AT, Park Y. Clinical, Economic, and Humanistic Burden Associated With Delayed Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review. Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:65-87. [PMID: 31965538 PMCID: PMC7021861 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-020-00194-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Few studies have evaluated the impact of delayed diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) on the overall burden of disease. The objective of this review was to evaluate the available literature on the clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of delayed diagnosis in patients with axSpA. METHODS This systematic literature review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the MEDLINE and Embase databases for English-language publications of original research articles (up to July 12, 2018) and conference abstracts (January 1, 2014, to July 12, 2018) reporting studies of adult patients with delayed diagnosis of axSpA associated with clinical, economic, or humanistic burden. Retrieved publications were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers; discrepancies were resolved by a third independent reviewer. Data were extracted by one reviewer and validated by a second independent reviewer. RESULTS A total of 1391 publications were retrieved, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Of these, 15 reported data on clinical burden, nine on economic burden, and six on humanistic burden, with eight studies reporting a combination of clinical, economic, and/or humanistic burden. Patients with a delayed diagnosis of axSpA generally had higher disease activity, worse physical function, and more structural damage than those who received an earlier diagnosis. Patients with a delayed diagnosis also had a greater likelihood of work disability and higher direct and indirect healthcare costs than those who received an earlier diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis was associated with a greater likelihood for depression, negative psychological impacts, and worse quality of life. CONCLUSIONS Delayed axSpA diagnosis was associated with more functional impairment, higher healthcare costs, and worse quality of life, highlighting the importance of early recognition of axSpA to reduce extensive burden on patients and society. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Yi
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
| | - Amit Ahuja
- Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd., Hyderabad, India
| | | | | | - Yujin Park
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kiltz U, Braun J, Becker A, Chenot JF, Dreimann M, Hammel L, Heiligenhaus A, Hermann KG, Klett R, Krause D, Kreitner KF, Lange U, Lauterbach A, Mau W, Mössner R, Oberschelp U, Philipp S, Pleyer U, Rudwaleit M, Schneider E, Schulte TL, Sieper J, Stallmach A, Swoboda B, Winking M. [Long version on the S3 guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis including Bechterew's disease and early forms, Update 2019 : Evidence-based guidelines of the German Society for Rheumatology (DGRh) and participating medical scientific specialist societies and other organizations]. Z Rheumatol 2020; 78:3-64. [PMID: 31784900 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-019-0670-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- U Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Deutschland.
| | - J Braun
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Claudiusstr. 45, 44649, Herne, Deutschland
| | | | - A Becker
- Allgemeinmedizin, präventive und rehabilitative Medizin, Universität Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 4, 35032, Marburg, Deutschland
| | | | - J-F Chenot
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Fleischmann Str. 6, 17485, Greifswald, Deutschland
| | - M Dreimann
- Zentrum für Operative Medizin, Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfall‑, Hand- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Deutschland
| | | | - L Hammel
- Geschäftsstelle des Bundesverbandes der DVMB, Metzgergasse 16, 97421, Schweinfurt, Deutschland
| | | | - A Heiligenhaus
- Augenzentrum und Uveitis-Zentrum, St. Franziskus Hospital, Hohenzollernring 74, 48145, Münster, Deutschland
| | | | - K-G Hermann
- Institut für Radiologie, Charité Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| | | | - R Klett
- Praxis Manuelle & Osteopathische Medizin, Fichtenweg 17, 35428, Langgöns, Deutschland
| | | | - D Krause
- , Friedrich-Ebert-Str. 2, 45964, Gladbeck, Deutschland
| | - K-F Kreitner
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - U Lange
- Kerckhoff-Klinik, Rheumazentrum, Osteologie & Physikalische Medizin, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Deutschland
| | | | - A Lauterbach
- Schule für Physiotherapie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Friedrichsheim, Marienburgstraße 2, 60528, Frankfurt, Deutschland
| | | | - W Mau
- Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät, Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06097, Halle (Saale), Deutschland
| | - R Mössner
- Klinik für Dermatologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland
| | | | - U Oberschelp
- , Barlachstr. 6, 59368, Werne a.d. L., Deutschland
| | | | - S Philipp
- Praxis für Dermatologie, Bernauer Str. 66, 16515, Oranienburg, Deutschland
| | - U Pleyer
- Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité Centrum 16, Klinik f. Augenheilkunde, Charité, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - M Rudwaleit
- Klinikum Bielefeld, An der Rosenhöhe 27, 33647, Bielefeld, Deutschland
| | - E Schneider
- Abt. Fachübergreifende Frührehabilitation und Sportmedizin, St. Antonius Hospital, Dechant-Deckersstr. 8, 52249, Eschweiler, Deutschland
| | - T L Schulte
- Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Gudrunstr. 65, 44791, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - J Sieper
- Medizinische Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Infektiologie und Rheumatologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - A Stallmach
- Klinik für Innere Medizin IV, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07743, Jena, Deutschland
| | | | - B Swoboda
- Abteilung für Orthopädie und Rheumatologie, Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | | | - M Winking
- Zentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinikum Osnabrück, Am Finkenhügel 3, 49076, Osnabrück, Deutschland
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ji X, Wang Y, Hu Z, Ma Y, Man S, Li K, Wang Y, Zhu J, Zhang J, Huang F. Effectiveness of Subcutaneous Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Real-World Prospective Observational Cohort Study in China. Front Pharmacol 2020; 10:1476. [PMID: 31920662 PMCID: PMC6929657 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2019.01476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: This prospective observational study investigated the efficacy of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) on disease activity, physical functionality, and mobility in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a real-world setting. Methods: The Chinese Ankylosing Spondylitis Prospective Imaging Cohort (CASPIC) is an ongoing cohort study. Patients with AS were included to one of two groups: the TNFi user group included those who received TNFi at any time point; the non-TNFi user group included those who did not receive TNFi. Disease activity, physical functionality, and mobility were assessed by AS Disease Activity Scores (ASDAS), Bath AS Functional Index (BASFI), and Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI), respectively. Results: A total of 804 patients with AS (241 TNFi users and 563 non-TNFi users) were recruited. For TNFi users, 83% received an etanercept biosimilar and 17.0% received adalimumab. Seventy-three TNFi users (30.3%) discontinued TNFis during the follow-up period; the mean duration of TNFi treatment was 6.9 ± 3.2 months. Reductions in ASDAS were significantly greater in TNFi users than in nonusers at 3, 6, and 12 months (differences in ASDAS reduction were 0.61, 0.56, and 0.46 units, respectively, all P < 0.05). Similarly, the improvement in BASFI was significantly greater in users than in nonusers at 3, 6, and 12 months (differences in BASFI improvement: 0.31, 0.75, and 0.74 units, respectively, all P < 0.05). BASMI increased in nonusers at 6 and 12 months (0.27, P = 0.47; 0.66, P < 0.001, respectively), but did not change in users (−0.16 and −0.13, respectively, both P > 0.05). At 12 months, changes in BASMI were significantly greater in nonusers than in users (−0.60, P = 0.47). Conclusion: TNFis are effective against disease activity and improve the physical functionality of patients with AS, even in those who taper or discontinue TNFis. Thus, TNFis may retard the progression of spinal mobility dysfunction in AS patients. TNF may maintain spinal mobility as indicated by the BASMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojian Ji
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yiwen Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengyuan Hu
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yingpei Ma
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Siliang Man
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kunpeng Li
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yanyan Wang
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Zhu
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jianglin Zhang
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Huang
- Department of Rheumatology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,State Key Laboratory of Kidney Disease, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hunter T, Schroeder K, Sandoval D, Deodhar A. Persistence, Discontinuation, and Switching Patterns of Newly Initiated TNF Inhibitor Therapy in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients in the United States. Rheumatol Ther 2019; 6:207-215. [PMID: 30835086 PMCID: PMC6514032 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-0148-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The primary goals of treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients are to maximize long-term health-related quality of life through control of symptoms and inflammation, prevention of progressive structural damage, and preservation of function. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns (persistence, discontinuations, and switch) in the 2 years following the initiation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) therapy in AS patients. METHODS Adult patients with ≥ 2 AS diagnostic codes (ICD-9: 720.0 and/or ICD-10:M45.x) by a healthcare provider were included in this retrospective analysis of data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims database. Patients who newly initiated a TNFi from 01/01/2009 to 12/31/2013 were indexed on their first TNFi. Patients were required to have a 1-year pre-index period free of TNFi and continuous enrollment 1-year pre-index and 2-year post-index. Patients were excluded if they had ≥ 2 diagnostic codes for any of the following conditions: rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, plaque psoriasis, hidradenitis suppurativa, or uveitis. Demographic, clinical, and treatment patterns were analyzed. Treatment patterns included switching to a new TNFi, discontinuation (≥ 90-day gap in therapy without starting a new TNFi), or persistence (no gaps in therapy ≥ 90 days) during the 2-year follow-up period. Logistic regression analyses predicting persistent vs. non-persistent and switching vs. discontinuation were conducted. RESULTS A total of 1372 AS patients (846 males/526 females) met the inclusion criteria for this study. Males had a mean age of 44.3 years, while females had a mean age of 42.3 years. Adalimumab was the first biologic for the majority of patients (44.6% males/43.3% females), followed by etanercept (40.4% males/41.6% females), infliximab (10.4% males/10.8% females), golimumab (4.6% males/3.8% females), and certolizumab pegol (0.0% males/0.4% females). During the follow-up period, 33.1% of patients (n = 454) were persistent on their index TNFi, 40.7% (n = 559) discontinued their index TNFi and did not restart a TNFi, and 26.1% (n = 359) switched to a second TNFi. Patients prescribed cDMARDs were more likely to be persistent, while females and opioid users were less likely to be persistent on their first TNFi. Among those that discontinued their first TNFi, 32.8% (n = 187) of males and 43.6% (n = 177) of females switched to a second TNFi. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that approximately 67% of male AS patients and 77% of female AS patients newly initiating a TNFi do not remain on the index therapy 2 year post initiation. FUNDING Eli Lilly and Company.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Atul Deodhar
- Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lindström U, Olofsson T, Wedrén S, Qirjazo I, Askling J. Biological treatment of ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in clinical practice. Arthritis Res Ther 2019; 21:128. [PMID: 31138285 PMCID: PMC6540538 DOI: 10.1186/s13075-019-1908-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is substantial evidence that patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) have high response rates to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), a low likelihood of successful treatment termination, but yet a limited drug retention. Whereas several reports have assessed drug retention rates for TNFi in AS, there are few, if any, studies investigating the actual treatment trajectories on a patient level, including subsequent therapy changes and dose reductions, of individual patients. The aim of this study was to describe 5-year treatment trajectories in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) starting a first TNFi. METHODS Bio-naïve patients with AS starting a TNFi in 2006-2015 were identified in the nationwide Swedish Rheumatology Quality register and followed until 31 December 2015. All changes in their anti-rheumatic treatment during follow-up were recorded. To further increase precision, these data were complimented by information on the amount of prescribed subcutaneous TNFi collected from pharmacies during each year, retrieved from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. RESULTS Two thousand five hundred ninety patients started a first TNFi 2006-2015, and after 1 year, 74% remained on their first TNFi. However, after 5 years, this figure was only 46%, although at that time 63% were still on treatment with any biologic, while 30% had no anti-rheumatic treatment at all. After discontinuing the first TNFi, 46% switched directly to a second TNFi, but the drug retention for the second and third TNFi grew successively shorter compared to that for the first TNFi. In contrast, patients remaining on treatment with their first subcutaneous TNFi gradually reduced the dose, so that during the fifth year of treatment only 66% had collected ≥ 75% of the defined daily doses for that year. CONCLUSION Less than half of patients with AS will remain on their first TNFi after 5 years, but most are still on a biologic. While patients remaining on treatment with their first TNFi appear to be able to reduce the dose over time, a large proportion cycle through several biologics, and 1/3 have no anti-rheumatic treatment after 5 years. This indicates the importance of thorough follow-up programs as well as a need for alternative therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Lindström
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Tor Olofsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sara Wedrén
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ilia Qirjazo
- Rheumatology Department, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Polo Y La Borda J, Campos J, Sanz J, Andréu JL, Mulero J, Sánchez A. Predictive clinical-genetic model of long-term non-response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor therapy in spondyloarthritis. Int J Rheum Dis 2019; 22:1529-1537. [PMID: 31119895 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Revised: 04/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) are effective in controlling disease activity in spondyloarthritis (SpA). However, in a proportion of patients these treatments are ineffective or lead to adverse events. Recently, alternative therapies, such as interleukin (IL)-17 or IL-23 inhibitors, have emerged in the treatment of these pathologies. This study aimed to determine clinical and genetic predictors of non-response to TNFi treatment in 118 spondyloarthritis patients diagnosed according to Assessment in SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. METHOD From the literature, 41 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected that had previously been associated with TNFi treatment response in spondyloarthropathies, rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. A clinical non-response was defined as a decrease of <50% of initial Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) in axial involvement, or a reduction of less than 1.2 of initial Disease Activity Score of 28 joints-C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) in patients with only peripheral involvement. Univariate and multivariate hazard ratios (HR) were determined using Cox proportional hazard models to analyze the potential prognostic factors affecting non-response to TNFi treatment. RESULTS The clinical factors that significantly increased the non-response rate were: global visual analog scale (VAS), CRP, BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), and the number of TNFi used. Only rs11591741 SNP showed an association with non-response. In the multivariate analysis, females had a non-response rate 4.46 times higher than males; each one-point increase in the BASFI index increased the non-response rate by 75%, and being a genotype GG vs GC or CC carrier was associated with an almost 4 times greater non-response rate. CONCLUSION We developed a clinical-genetic model to identify SpA patients with a long-term non-response to TNFi therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Polo Y La Borda
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Rey Juan Carlos, Móstoles, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Campos
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesús Sanz
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - José Luis Andréu
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Mulero
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandra Sánchez
- Department of Rheumatology, IDIPHISA, Puerta de Hierro - Segovia de Arana Health Research Institute, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ogdie A, Benjamin Nowell W, Reynolds R, Gavigan K, Venkatachalam S, de la Cruz M, Flood E, Schwartz EJ, Romero B, Park Y. Real-World Patient Experience on the Path to Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis. Rheumatol Ther 2019; 6:255-267. [PMID: 31041666 PMCID: PMC6513959 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-0153-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We describe the journey to diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the patient perspective and examine differences in this journey by sex. Methods US adults aged ≥ 18 years with a self-reported AS diagnosis were recruited online through CreakyJoints, a patient support community, and ArthritisPower, a patient research registry. Respondents completed a web-based survey on sociodemographics, disease burden, and diagnosis history. Results were stratified by sex and time to diagnosis using two-sample t tests and χ2 tests, respectively, to observe differences across the groups; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Among 235 respondents, 174 (74.0%) were female. Mean (SD) ages of female and male respondents were 48.6 (10.6) and 53.1 (10.3) years, respectively. From the time respondents began seeking medical attention, 87 were diagnosed within ≤ 1 year, 71 in 2–9 years, and 77 after ≥ 10 years. Symptoms that led respondents to seek treatment were back pain (73.2%) and joint pain (63.8%); fatigue and difficulty sleeping were more common among respondents with longer times to diagnosis. During the diagnosis process, men with AS tended to receive quicker AS diagnosis compared with women. Overall, commonly reported initial diagnoses among respondents with longer time to AS diagnosis included back problems and psychosomatic disorders. Significantly more women reported misdiagnoses of fibromyalgia (20.7 vs. 6.6%) and psychosomatic disorders (40.8 vs. 23.0%) compared with men. Conclusions Diagnosis delays and misdiagnoses were common among respondents with AS. Increasing awareness about AS among referring providers may minimize diagnosis delay. Funding Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Plain Language Summary Plain language summary available for this article. Electronic Supplementary Material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-0153-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Ogdie
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | | | | | - Kelly Gavigan
- Global Healthy Living Foundation, Upper Nyack, NY, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Yujin Park
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
van der Slik B, Spoorenberg A, Wink F, Bos R, Bootsma H, Maas F, Arends S. Although female patients with ankylosing spondylitis score worse on disease activity than male patients and improvement in disease activity is comparable, male patients show more radiographic progression during treatment with TNF-α inhibitors. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2019; 48:828-833. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.07.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
32
|
Smolen JS, Gladman D, McNeil HP, Mease PJ, Sieper J, Hojnik M, Nurwakagari P, Weinman J. Predicting adherence to therapy in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis: a large cross-sectional study. RMD Open 2019; 5:e000585. [PMID: 30713716 PMCID: PMC6340591 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Revised: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This analysis explored the association of treatment adherence with beliefs about medication, patient demographic and disease characteristics and medication types in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or ankylosing spondylitis (AS) to develop adherence prediction models. Methods The population was a subset from ALIGN, a multicountry, cross-sectional, self-administered survey study in adult patients (n=7328) with six immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who were routinely receiving systemic therapy. Instruments included Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) and 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4©), which was used to define adherence. Results A total of 3390 rheumatological patients were analysed (RA, n=1943; PsA, n=635; AS, n=812). Based on the strongest significant associations, the adherence prediction models included type of treatment, age, race (RA and AS) or disease duration (PsA) and medication beliefs (RA and PsA, BMQ-General Harm score; AS, BMQ-Specific Concerns score). The models had cross-validated areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.637 (RA), 0.641 (PsA) and 0.724 (AS). Predicted probabilities of full adherence (MMAS-4©=4) ranged from 5% to 96%. Adherence was highest for tumour necrosis factor inhibitors versus other treatments, older patients and those with low treatment harm beliefs or concerns. Adherence was higher in white patients with RA and AS and in patients with PsA with duration of disease <9 years. Conclusions For the first time, simple medication adherence prediction models for patients with RA, PsA and AS are available, which may help identify patients at high risk of non-adherence to systemic therapies. Trial registration number ACTRN12612000977875.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dafna Gladman
- Department of Medicine, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - H Patrick McNeil
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Philip J Mease
- Department of Rheumatology, Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joachim Sieper
- Department of Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Maja Hojnik
- Global Medical Affairs Rheumatology, AbbVie s.r.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Pascal Nurwakagari
- Medical Department, AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - John Weinman
- Institute of Pharmaceutical Science, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shimabuco AY, Gonçalves CR, Moraes JCB, Waisberg MG, Ribeiro ACDM, Sampaio-Barros PD, Goldenstein-Schainberg C, Bonfa E, Saad CGS. Factors associated with ASDAS remission in a long-term study of ankylosing spondylitis patients under tumor necrosis factor inhibitors. Adv Rheumatol 2018; 58:40. [PMID: 30657103 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-018-0040-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the clinical and demographic factors associated with disease remission and drug survival in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) on TNF inhibitors. METHODS Data from a longitudinal electronic database of AS patients under anti-TNF therapy between June/2004 and August/2013. Demographic, clinical parameters, disease activity by ASDAS remission (< 1.3) and inactive/low (< 2.1) were analyzed to characterize reasons for drug survival and switching of anti-TNF. RESULTS Among 117 AS patients, 69 (59%) were prescribed only one anti-TNF, 48 (41%) switched to a second anti-TNF and 13 (11%) to a third anti-TNF. Considering ASDAS-CRP < 1.3, 31 (39%) patients were inactive at the end of the study. Non-switchers (P = 0.04), younger age (P = 0.004), non-smoking (P = 0.016), shorter disease duration (P = 0.047), more frequent use of SSZ (P = 0.037) and lower BASDAI (P = 0.027), BASMI (P = 0.034) and BASFI (P = 0.003) at baseline were associated with remission. In the multivariate analysis younger age (P = 0.016) and lower BASDAI (P = 0.032) remained as remission predictors. CONCLUSION This study supports that ASDAS-CRP remission is an achievable goal not only for non-switchers but also for second anti-TNF, particularly in patients with younger age and lower BASDAI at baseline. Co-medication and non-smoker status seems to have a beneficial effect in anti-TNF response in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Y Shimabuco
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Celio R Gonçalves
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Julio C B Moraes
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Mariana G Waisberg
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Ana Cristina de M Ribeiro
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Percival D Sampaio-Barros
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Claudia Goldenstein-Schainberg
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Eloisa Bonfa
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil
| | - Carla G S Saad
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455 3° andar - sala 3131 - Cerqueira César, São Paulo, SP, Cep: 01246-903, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor Discontinuation in Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: An Observational Study From the US-Based Corrona Registry. Rheumatol Ther 2018; 5:537-550. [PMID: 30353387 PMCID: PMC6251840 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-018-0129-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) have shown efficacy for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, many patients may discontinue or switch TNFis due to lack of effect or adverse events. As biologics with alternative mechanisms of action become available for the treatment of AS, it is important to better understand the characteristics of patients who discontinue or have an inadequate response to TNFis to help inform treatment choices regarding initiating or switching to a biologic therapy. This study compared demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with AS who discontinued vs. continued a TNFi by their second follow-up visit in the US-based Corrona Psoriatic Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis (PsA/SpA) Registry. METHODS All patients aged ≥ 18 years with AS enrolled in the Corrona PsA/SpA Registry between April 2013 and January 2015 who were receiving or had initiated a TNFi (index therapy) at the time of registry enrollment (baseline) and had ≥ 2 follow-up visits were included. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome scores at baseline were compared between cohorts of patients who discontinued or continued their TNFi by the second follow-up visit. RESULTS Of the 155 included patients, 37 (23.9%) discontinued their index TNFi therapy by the second follow-up visit (mean follow-up, 17.8 months). Patients who discontinued their TNFi were older (mean age, 52.1 vs. 46.6 years; P = 0.04), were more likely to be obese (59.5% vs. 34.2%; P < 0.01), and had worse mean Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index scores (4.8 vs. 3.5 and 4.2 vs. 2.8, respectively; P = 0.01 for both) at baseline than those who continued their TNFi. CONCLUSIONS The results of this real-world study provide insight into the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with AS who discontinue vs. continue TNFi therapy in US clinical practice. FUNDING Corrona, LLC. Plain language summary available for this article.
Collapse
|
35
|
Lindström U, Olofsson T, Wedrén S, Qirjazo I, Askling J. Impact of extra-articular spondyloarthritis manifestations and comorbidities on drug retention of a first TNF-inhibitor in ankylosing spondylitis: a population-based nationwide study. RMD Open 2018; 4:e000762. [PMID: 30402269 PMCID: PMC6203098 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 09/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To assess the impact of extra-articular spondyloarthritis (SpA) manifestations (anterior uveitis, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)), and of comorbidities, on tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) drug retention in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Methods We identified all bio-naïve patients with AS starting a first ever TNFi July 2006 to December 2015 from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality register and followed these from treatment start through December 2015. We determined the presence of extra-articular SpA-manifestations, comorbidities (cardiovascular disease, affective disease, diabetes, malignancies, chronic lung disease and kidney disease) and socioeconomic status before TNFi start, through linkage to five other national registers, and calculated, for each factor, crude and adjusted HRs for discontinuing the TNFi. Results 2577 patients with AS (71% men) started a first TNFi during the study period. 27% had a history of anterior uveitis, 6% psoriasis and 7% IBD. Anterior uveitis was associated with a superior TNFi drug retention (HR 0.72; 0.62 to 0.83), psoriasis with an inferior (HR 1.48; 1.18 to 1.86), whereas IBD did not affect TNFi drug retention. The effect of the SpA manifestations on TNFi drug retention was of a similar magnitude to that of the comorbidities. Conclusions In AS, anterior uveitis and psoriasis, but not IBD, affect TNFi drug retention. Possible explanations include differential effects of TNFi on these extra-articular SpA manifestations, or inherent differences in AS, associated with the inflammatory phenotype. Further, comorbidities and socioeconomy affect TNFi drug retention to a similar magnitude as the SpA manifestations, and should, as such, receive due attention in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Lindström
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tor Olofsson
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sara Wedrén
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ilia Qirjazo
- Rheumatology Department, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
The effect of extra-articular manifestations on tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor treatment duration in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: nationwide data from the Korean College of Rheumatology BIOlogics (KOBIO) registry. Clin Rheumatol 2018; 37:3275-3284. [PMID: 30251059 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-018-4290-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 09/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy has shown to be remarkably effective for treating ankylosing spondylitis (AS); however, nearly 30% of AS patients every year either stop TNFi therapy or switch to a different TNFi due to inefficacy or adverse effects. The goal of this study was to identify predictors of TNFi treatment duration, including extra-articular manifestations, using a nationwide registry in Korea. Data obtained from the Korean College of Rheumatology Biologics (KOBIO) registry, a nationwide, multi-center database representing 58 tertiary care hospitals in Korea. Demographics, clinical features, laboratory findings, disease activity indices (BASDAI, ASDAS-ESR, ASDAS-CRP), peripheral arthritis, and extra-articular manifestations (uveitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease) were studied in patients with AS during TNFi therapy. We also analyzed treatment duration outcomes for five TNFi agents (etanercept, infliximab, infliximab biosimilar, adalimumab, and golimumab), as well as factors associated with treatment duration, particularly in terms of extra-articular manifestations. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to verify preliminary results. A total 1482 AS patients starting TNFi drug therapy between Dec. 2012 and Jan. 2017 were included. No differences in demographics, disease activity, or extra-articular manifestations were evident between continued and discontinued TNFi groups at baseline, though baseline differences were detected for gender distribution, CRP, platelet counts, and HLA-B27 positivity. During treatment period, the effects of extra-articular manifestations, including uveitis (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57 to 1.48, p = 0.74), enthesitis, dactylitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease, on TNFi treatment duration were not statistically significant. By contrast, the occurrence of peripheral arthritis was significantly associated with shorter TNFi treatment duration (unadjusted HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.66 to 2.95; adjusted HR 1.38, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.88). Among disease activity indices, higher ASDAS-ESR levels were significantly associated with shortening of the TNFi treatment duration (unadjusted HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.73 to 2.03; adjusted HR 2.23, 95% CI 2.00 to 2.63). Among TNFi drugs, golimumab had a lower discontinuation rate than that of etanercept over a 3-year follow-up period (unadjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.68; adjusted HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.99). In a nationwide KOBIO registry, extra-articular manifestations, including uveitis, were not associated with TNFi treatment duration. Among clinical cofactors, the development of peripheral arthritis during TNFi therapy was associated with a higher risk of TNFi treatment discontinuance in AS patients.
Collapse
|
37
|
Gender does not make a difference in “composite psoriatic disease activity index (CPDAI)” in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatol Int 2018; 38:2069-2076. [DOI: 10.1007/s00296-018-4153-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
38
|
Maniadakis N, Toth E, Schiff M, Wang X, Nassim M, Szegvari B, Mountian I, Curtis JR. A Targeted Literature Review Examining Biologic Therapy Compliance and Persistence in Chronic Inflammatory Diseases to Identify the Associated Unmet Needs, Driving Factors, and Consequences. Adv Ther 2018; 35:1333-1355. [PMID: 30078176 PMCID: PMC6133150 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-018-0759-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Chronic inflammatory diseases (CIDs) represent a substantial clinical and economic burden to patients, providers, payers and society overall. Biologics, such as tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi), have emerged as effective treatment options for patients with CIDs. However, the therapeutic potential of biologics is not always achieved in clinical practice, with results from studies examining the use of biologics in real-world settings suggesting lower levels of treatment effectiveness compared with clinical trial results. Using a targeted approach, this literature review demonstrates that compliance and persistence with biologic therapy is suboptimal and that this has implications for both clinical outcomes and treatment costs. The review identified a variety of predictors of treatment compliance and persistence, including increased age, female gender, presence of comorbidities, increased disease activity, longer disease duration, smoking, increased body mass index, higher biologic treatment dose, higher treatment cost and lower health-related quality-of-life scores. Patients often cited factors associated with medication delivery as a reason for non-compliance and non-persistence, and device-related improvements to treatment delivery were associated with higher rates of compliance and persistence. The articles identified in this review provide insights that have the potential to help guide the development of new solutions to improve disease management and optimize treatment regimens. This has the potential to benefit patients' health by improving clinical outcomes and to reduce the burden to society by limiting the economic impact of patients' disease. FUNDING UCB Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikos Maniadakis
- Department of Health Services Organization and Management, National School of Public Health, Athens, Greece.
| | | | - Michael Schiff
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kiltz U, van der Heijde D, Boonen A, Akkoc N, Bautista-Molano W, Burgos-Vargas R, Wei JCC, Chiowchanwisawakit P, Dougados M, Duruoz MT, Elzorkany BK, Gaydukova I, Gensler LS, Gilio M, Grazio S, Gu J, Inman RD, Kim TJ, Navarro-Compan V, Marzo-Ortega H, Ozgocmen S, Pimentel Dos Santos F, Schirmer M, Stebbings S, Van den Bosch FE, van Tubergen A, Braun J. Measurement properties of the ASAS Health Index: results of a global study in patients with axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77:1311-1317. [PMID: 29858176 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 86] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2017] [Revised: 04/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate construct validity, interpretability, reliability and responsiveness as well as determination of cut-off points for good and poor health within the original English version and the 18 translations of the disease-specific Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society Health Index (ASAS HI) in 23 countries worldwide in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS A representative sample of patients with SpA fulfilling the ASAS classification criteria for axial (axSpA) or peripheral SpA was used. The construct validity of the ASAS HI was tested using Spearman correlation with several standard health outcomes for axSpA. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) in patients with stable disease (interval 4-7 days). In patients who required an escalation of therapy because of high disease activity, responsiveness was tested after 2-24weeks using standardised response mean (SRM). RESULTS Among the 1548 patients, 64.9% were men, with a mean (SD) age 42.0 (13.4) years. Construct validity ranged from low (age: 0.10) to high (Bath AnkylosingSpondylitisFunctioning Index: 0.71). Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α of 0.93). The reliability among 578 patients was good (ICC=0.87 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89)). Responsiveness among 246 patients was moderate-large (SRM=-0.44 for non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, -0.69 for conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug and -0.85 for tumour necrosis factor inhibitor). The smallest detectable change was 3.0. Values ≤5.0 have balanced specificity to distinguish good health as opposed to moderate health, and values ≥12.0 are specific to represent poor health as opposed to moderate health. CONCLUSIONS The ASAS HI proved to be valid, reliable and responsive. It can be used to evaluate the impact of SpA and its treatment on functioning and health. Furthermore, comparison of disease impact between populations is possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | | | - Annelies Boonen
- Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Wilson Bautista-Molano
- School of Medicine, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada and Rheumatology Department, Hospital Militar, Bogotà, Colombia
| | | | - James Cheng-Chung Wei
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Institute of Medicine, Graduate Institute of Integrated Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | | | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology, Servicio de Reumatologia, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris INSERM (U1153): Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, H, Paris, France
| | - M Tuncay Duruoz
- PMR Department, Rheumatology Division, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Inna Gaydukova
- North-Western State Medical University named after I I Mechnikov, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Lianne S Gensler
- Division of Rheumatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michele Gilio
- Department of Lucania, San Carlo Hospital of Potenza and Madonna delle Grazie Hospital of Matera, Potenza and Matera and PhD Scholarship in Life Sciences, Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro 'Magna Graecia', Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Simeon Grazio
- Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Jieruo Gu
- University of Guangzhou, Guangzhou, China
| | - Robert D Inman
- Spondylitis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tae-Jong Kim
- Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, South Korea
| | | | - Helena Marzo-Ortega
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds, and Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Salih Ozgocmen
- Department of Rheumatology, Medicalpark Gaziosmanpasa Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Michael Schirmer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Innsbruck Medical University, Clinic II, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Simon Stebbings
- Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Filip E Van den Bosch
- VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Unit for Molecular Immunology and Inflammation, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Astrid van Tubergen
- Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Soubrier M, Pereira B, Fan A, Frayssac T, Couderc M, Malochet-Guinamand S, Mathieu S, Tatar Z, Tournadre A, Dubost JJ. Retention rates of adalimumab, etanercept, and infliximab as first- or second-line biotherapies for spondyloarthritis patients in daily practice in Auvergne (France). Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21:1986-1992. [PMID: 30168265 PMCID: PMC6585683 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Objective To compare, in real‐life settings, the retention rates of initial anti‐tumor‐necrosis factor (TNF) treatments (etanercept [ETN], adalimumab [ADA] and infliximab [IFX]) used as first‐line biotherapy for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), and evaluate treatment switches to another anti‐TNF inhibitor in the event of treatment failure. Methods We analyzed the medical records of all SpA patients (Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group axial criteria) treated with ETN, IFX or ADA between 2001 and February 2015. Drug retention rates were calculated using the Kaplan‐Meier method and compared by means of the Cox extended model. Sub‐analyses were performed according to discontinuation reasons. Results Of the 249 SpA patients analyzed (135 radiographic cases, 114 non‐radiographic), 102 received ETN, 62 ADA, and 85 IFX. In total, 103 discontinued treatment. The retention rates of IFX, ADA and ETN were 67%, 59% and 56% after 3 years; 62%, 42% and 47% after 5 years; 55%, 42% and 24% after 8 years; 53%, 42% and 12% after 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analyses, the predictive factors for retention were: low BASDAI score (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.02 [1.01‐1.04]), high C‐reactive protein levels (HR: 0.98 [0.97‐0.99]), concomitant disease‐modifying therapy (HR: 0.4 [0.21‐0.75]), and radiographic SpA (HR: 1.5 [1.0‐2.52]). In total, 61 patients switched to another anti‐TNF therapy. No difference was observed among the three anti‐TNF therapies regarding median retention duration, although the retention rate proved higher for treatment switches from one monoclonal antibody to another. Conclusion The retention rate in SpA patients proved high, with retention for IFX superior to that of ETN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Soubrier
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Bruno Pereira
- DRCI, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Angelique Fan
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Thomas Frayssac
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marion Couderc
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Sylvain Mathieu
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Zuzana Tatar
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Anne Tournadre
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Jean-Jacques Dubost
- Rhumatologie, Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital, Hôpital Gabriel Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Højgaard P, Ballegaard C, Cordtz R, Zobbe K, Clausen M, Glintborg B, Kristensen LE, Dreyer L. Gender differences in biologic treatment outcomes—a study of 1750 patients with psoriatic arthritis using Danish Health Care Registers. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2018; 57:1651-1660. [DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/key140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2017] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pil Højgaard
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christine Ballegaard
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - René Cordtz
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Kristian Zobbe
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Marianne Clausen
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Bente Glintborg
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Rigshospitalet Glostrup, The DANBIO registry, Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Lars Erik Kristensen
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Lene Dreyer
- Rigshospitalet Gentofte, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Frederiksberg and Bispebjerg Hospitals, The Parker Institute, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Oral treatment options for AS and PsA: DMARDs and small-molecule inhibitors. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2018; 32:415-426. [DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2018] [Revised: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 07/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
43
|
Rusman T, van Vollenhoven RF, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE. Gender Differences in Axial Spondyloarthritis: Women Are Not So Lucky. Curr Rheumatol Rep 2018; 20:35. [PMID: 29754330 PMCID: PMC5949138 DOI: 10.1007/s11926-018-0744-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) was historically seen as a predominantly male disease. However, more recent data showed a more homogenous sex prevalence. Unfortunately, in many studies in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), the number of women included is low and the analyses are often not stratified for gender distribution. The purpose of this review is to aggregate the existing data on gender differences in axSpA in order to increase the awareness that female axSpA patients are still under-recognized. RECENT FINDINGS Several studies considering gender differences revealed that female axSpA patients had different disease manifestations due to different immunological, hormonal, and genetic responses. For instance, allelic frequencies of the AHNK-gene and tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase (TNAP) haplotypes differed between men and women with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). In addition, different levels of tumor necrosis factor (TNF), interleukins IL-6, IL-17, and IL-18, were found between the two sexes. Furthermore, female patients show a higher diagnostic delay compared to males. Several studies indicate a higher frequency of extra-articular manifestations (EAM) in female axSpA patients, such as enthesitis, psoriasis, and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), whereas acute anterior uveitis is more prevalent in male patients. Male AS patients more frequently show a higher Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI) scores and modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Scores (mSASSS) than females, which indicates that males have higher radiological damage and radiographic progression. However, disease activity (BASDAI) and quality of life (AsQol) scores are significantly higher in women, and more importantly, they have significantly lower response rates to treatment with TNF inhibitors (TNFi) and a significantly lower drug adherence. Despite the fact that men with axial SpA have a worse radiologic prognosis, women have a high disease burden, in part because they have a longer delay in diagnosis, higher disease activity, and significantly less responsiveness to treatment with TNFi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Rusman
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jones A, Ciurtin C, Ismajli M, Leandro M, Sengupta R, Machado PM. Biologics for treating axial spondyloarthritis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2018; 18:641-652. [DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1468884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Jones
- Rheumatology Department, University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Coziana Ciurtin
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Mediola Ismajli
- Rheumatology Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Maria Leandro
- University College London Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Raj Sengupta
- Royal National Hospital For Rheumatic Diseases, Bath, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| | - Pedro M. Machado
- Centre for Rheumatology & MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, University College London, London, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rusman T, ten Wolde S, Euser SM, van der Ploeg T, van Hall O, van der Horst‐Bruinsma IE. Gender differences in retention rate of tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor treatment in ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective cohort study in daily practice. Int J Rheum Dis 2018; 21:836-842. [PMID: 29611349 PMCID: PMC5901415 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.13271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess gender differences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients in relation to tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) drug survival and occurrence of adverse events in daily practice in a large peripheral hospital. METHOD Retrospective data were collected from AS patients treated with etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab between January 2004 and January 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were conducted to describe the drug survival and occurrence of adverse events in time. RESULTS Overall, 122 AS patients (60.7% male) were included over a 10-year time period, with a mean treatment period of 51 months (1-127 months). In total, 21 (17.2%) patients stopped the TNFi, mainly due to inefficacy (52.4%). Female patients showed a significant shorter treatment period compared to males (33.4 vs. 44.9 months). In addition, female patients switched more between TNFi compared to males (26.9% vs. 16.3%) and had a significantly higher risk at developing infections compared to male patients (26% vs.19%). CONCLUSION Females stayed on the same TNFi for a significantly shorter period compared to males (33.4 vs. 44.9 months) and the most important reason to stop or switch the drug was inefficacy. Moreover, females seemed to be more prone to infections during TNFi treatment than males.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamara Rusman
- Amsterdam Rheumatology and Immunology CenterDepartment of RheumatologyVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | | | - Sjoerd M. Euser
- Regional Laboratory of Public HealthKennemerland HaarlemHaarlemThe Netherlands
- Spaarne Gasthuis AcademieHaarlemThe Netherlands
| | - Tjeerd van der Ploeg
- Spaarne Medical Centre AlkmaarHaarlemThe Netherlands
- Spaarne Gasthuis AcademieHaarlemThe Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Flouri ID, Markatseli TE, Boki KA, Papadopoulos I, Skopouli FN, Voulgari PV, Settas L, Zisopoulos D, Iliopoulos A, Geborek P, Drosos AA, Boumpas DT, Sidiropoulos P. Comparative Analysis and Predictors of 10-year Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Drug Survival in Patients with Spondyloarthritis: First-year Response Predicts Longterm Drug Persistence. J Rheumatol 2018; 45:785-794. [PMID: 29606666 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the 10-year drug survival of the first tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) administered to patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) overall and comparatively between SpA subsets, and to identify predictors of drug retention. METHODS Patients with SpA in the Hellenic Registry of Biologic Therapies, a prospective multicenter observational cohort, starting their first TNFi between 2004-2014 were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS Overall, 404 out of 1077 patients (37.5%) discontinued treatment (followup: 4288 patient-yrs). Ten-year drug survival was 49%. In the unadjusted analyses, higher TNFi survival was observed in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared to undifferentiated SpA and psoriatic arthritis [PsA; significant beyond the first 2.5 (p = 0.003) years and 7 years (p < 0.001), respectively], and in patients treated for isolated axial versus peripheral arthritis (p = 0.001). In all multivariable analyses, male sex was a predictor for longer TNFi survival. Use of methotrexate (MTX) was a predictor in PsA and in patients with peripheral arthritis. Absence of peripheral arthritis and use of a monoclonal antibody (as opposed to non-antibody TNFi) independently predicted longer TNFi survival in axial disease because of lower rates of inefficacy. Achievement of major responses during the first year in either axial or peripheral arthritis was the strongest predictor of longer therapy retention (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.41 for Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score inactive disease, and HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.24-0.50 for 28-joint Disease Activity Score remission). CONCLUSION The longterm retention of the first TNFi administered to patients with SpA is high, especially for males with axial disease. The strongest predictor of longterm TNFi survival is a major response within the first year of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irini D Flouri
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Theodora E Markatseli
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Kyriaki A Boki
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Ioannis Papadopoulos
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Fotini N Skopouli
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Paraskevi V Voulgari
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Loukas Settas
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Dimitrios Zisopoulos
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Alexios Iliopoulos
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Pierre Geborek
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Alexandros A Drosos
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Dimitrios T Boumpas
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete
| | - Prodromos Sidiropoulos
- From the Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete, Heraklion; Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, Ioannina; Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens; Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens, Athens; Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala, Kavala; First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital, Thessaloniki, Greece; Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. .,I.D. Flouri, MD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete; T.E. Markatseli, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; K.A. Boki, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Department, Sismanoglio Hospital; I. Papadopoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, General Hospital of Kavala; F.N. Skopouli, MD, PhD, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Harokopio University of Athens; P.V. Voulgari, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; L. Settas, MD, PhD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School; D. Zisopoulos, MD, First Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology Section, AHEPA Hospital of the Aristotle University Medical School, and Rheumatology Department, 424 General Army Hospital; A. Iliopoulos, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Veterans Administration Hospital; P. Geborek, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Skȧne University Hospital; A.A. Drosos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina; D.T. Boumpas, MD, PhD, Joint Academic Rheumatology Program, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodestrian University of Athens, and Fourth Internal Medicine Department, Attikon University Hospital of Athens; P. Sidiropoulos, MD, PhD, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Department, Medical School, University of Crete.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hebeisen M, Neuenschwander R, Scherer A, Exer P, Weber U, Tamborrini G, Micheroli R, Wildi LM, Zufferey P, Nissen MJ, Villiger PM, Bernhard J, Finckh A, van der Horst-Bruinsma IE, Sieper J, Landewé R, van der Heijde D, Ciurea A. Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibition in Male and Female Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis: Data from a Swiss Cohort. J Rheumatol 2018; 45:506-512. [PMID: 29449504 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.170166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate sex differences in connection with the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS A total of 440 patients with AS (294 men; 146 women) initiating a first TNFi in the prospective Swiss Clinical Quality Management Cohort were included. We evaluated the proportion of patients achieving the 20% and 40% improvement in the Assessment of Spondyloarthritis international Society criteria (ASAS20 and ASAS40) as well as Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) improvement and status scores at 1 year. Patients having discontinued TNFi were considered nonresponders. Logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for important predictors of response. RESULTS Compared to men, female patients had lower mean C-reactive protein levels, better spinal mobility, and more peripheral disease at the start. There was no sex disparity with regard to the ASDAS, the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity and Functional indices, and the quality of life. At 1 year, 52% of women and 63% of men achieved an ASAS20 response (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.37-1.07, p = 0.09). An inactive disease status (ASDAS < 1.3) was reached by 18% of women and 26% of men (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32-1.27, p = 0.22). These sex differences in response to TNFi were more pronounced in adjusted analyses (OR 0.34, 95% CI 0.16-0.71, p = 0.005 for ASAS20 and OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03-0.31, p < 0.001 for ASDAS < 1.3) and confirmed for all the other outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION In AS, fewer women respond to TNFi and women show a reduced response in comparison to men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Hebeisen
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Regula Neuenschwander
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Almut Scherer
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Pascale Exer
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Ulrich Weber
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Giorgio Tamborrini
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Raphael Micheroli
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Lukas M Wildi
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Pascal Zufferey
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Michael J Nissen
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Peter M Villiger
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Jürg Bernhard
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Axel Finckh
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Irene E van der Horst-Bruinsma
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Joachim Sieper
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Robert Landewé
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Désirée van der Heijde
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital
| | - Adrian Ciurea
- From the Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital, Zurich; Praxis Rheuma-Basel, Basel, Switzerland; King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten; Institute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Ultrasound Center Rheumatology, Basel; Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne; Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Geneva; Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital, Bern; Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital, Solothurn, Switzerland; Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany; Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam; Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen; Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. .,M. Hebeisen, MSc, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; R. Neuenschwander, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; A. Scherer, PhD, Swiss Clinical Quality Management Foundation; P. Exer, MD, Praxis Rheuma-Basel; U. Weber, MD, King Christian 10th Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Gråsten, and South Jutland Hospital, Institute of Regional Health Research; G. Tamborrini, MD, Ultrasound Center Rheumatology; R. Micheroli, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; L.M. Wildi, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital; P. Zufferey, MD, Department of Rheumatology, CHUV; M.J. Nissen, MD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; P.M. Villiger, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Inselspital; J. Bernhard, MD, Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Bürgerspital; A. Finckh, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital; I.E. van der Horst-Bruinsma, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, VU University Medical Center; J. Sieper, MD, Department of Gastroenterology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin; R. Landewé, MD, PhD, Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Amsterdam, and Department of Rheumatology, Zuyderland Hospital; D. van der Heijde, MD, PhD, Department of Rheumatology, Leiden University Medical Center; A. Ciurea, MD, Department of Rheumatology, Zurich University Hospital.
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Torre-Alonso JC, Queiro R, Comellas M, Lizán L, Blanch C. Patient-reported outcomes in European spondyloarthritis patients: a systematic review of the literature. Patient Prefer Adherence 2018; 12:733-747. [PMID: 29780239 PMCID: PMC5951138 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s162420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aims to summarize the current literature on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in spondyloarthritis (SpA). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a systematic literature review to identify studies (original articles and narrative and systematic reviews) regarding PROs (health-related quality of life [HRQoL], satisfaction, preferences, adherence/compliance, and persistence) in SpA patients published in the European Union through December 2016. International databases (Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus) were searched using keywords in English. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine criteria. RESULTS A total of 26 publications met the inclusion criteria. Generally, studies indicated that SpA has a negative impact on patients' HRQoL. In patients with ankylosing spondylitis, physical domains were more affected than emotional ones, whereas for psoriatic arthritis, both physical and psychological factors were strongly affected by the disease. Data indicated that biological agents (BAs) greatly contributed to improvement in HRQoL in both ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis patients. Findings on compliance with BAs were heterogeneous. However, persistence rates exceeded 50% irrespective of the BA administered. Results on preferences indicated that most SpA patients prefer being involved in decisions regarding their treatment and that besides efficacy and safety, frequency and route of administration may influence patients' preferences for BAs. CONCLUSION Implementing management programs for SpA patients focuses on the physical, emotional, and social consequences of the disease, in addition to assessing and including patient preferences in the treatment decision-making process, could be crucial to improve patients' HRQoL and ensure their satisfaction and compliance with treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Carlos Torre-Alonso
- Rheumatology Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oviedo, Hospital Monte Naranco, Oviedo, Spain
- Correspondence: Juan Carlos Torre-Alonso, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Reumatología Hospital Universitario Monte Naranco, 107 Avenida Doctores Fernández Vega, Oviedo, Asturias 33012, Spain, Tel +34 985 106 900, Email
| | - Rubén Queiro
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias (HUCA), Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Luís Lizán
- Outcomes 10, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
- Medicine Department, Jaime I University, Castellón de la Plana, Spain
| | - Carles Blanch
- Health Economics & Market Access, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lu MC, Tung CH, Yang CC, Wang CL, Huang KY, Koo M, Lai NS. Incident osteoarthritis and osteoarthritis-related joint replacement surgery in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A secondary cohort analysis of a nationwide, population-based health claims database. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0187594. [PMID: 29095939 PMCID: PMC5667826 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187594] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2017] [Accepted: 10/22/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) might be associated with an increased risk of secondary osteoarthritis. However, there is a lack of studies assessing its impact on osteoarthritis-related surgery. The aim of this secondary cohort study was to investigate the risk of symptomatic osteoarthritis and osteoarthritis-related surgery, including total hip replacement surgery (THRS) and total knee replacement surgery (TKRS) in patients with AS. METHODS Using the Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 3,462 patients with AS between 2000 and 2012. A comparison cohort was assembled consisting of five patients without AS, based on frequency matching for sex, 10-year age interval, and index year, for each patient with AS. Both groups were followed until diagnosis of the study outcomes or the end of the follow-up period. RESULTS Male patients with AS exhibited a significantly higher incidence of osteoarthritis (adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.43; P < 0.001), THRS (adjusted IRR 12.59; P < 0.001), and TKRS (adjusted IRR 1.89; P = 0.036). Moreover, analyses stratified by age group (20-39 years versus 40-80 years) indicated a high IRR (adjusted IRR 27.66; P <0.001) for THRS among younger patients with AS. CONCLUSIONS Male patients with AS had a significant higher risk of developing osteoarthritis, and receiving THRS and TKRS. Young patients with AS also showed a significant higher risk of receiving THRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Chi Lu
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hsueh Tung
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chang-Chen Yang
- Division of Orthopedics, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Lung Wang
- Division of Pediatrics, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Kuang-Yung Huang
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
| | - Malcolm Koo
- Department of Medical Research, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- * E-mail: (MK); (NSL)
| | - Ning-Sheng Lai
- Division of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Dalin, Chiayi, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien City, Taiwan
- * E-mail: (MK); (NSL)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sepriano A, Ramiro S, van der Heijde D, Ávila-Ribeiro P, Fonseca R, Borges J, Teixeira L, Carvalho PD, Cerqueira M, Neves J, Meirinhos T, Barcelos A, Sequeira G, Salvador MJ, Canas da Silva J, Santos H, Bernardes M, Vieira-Sousa E, Canhão H, Branco JC, Pimentel-Santos F, Landewé R. Effect of Comedication With Conventional Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs on Retention of Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Patients With Spondyloarthritis: A Prospective Cohort Study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2017; 68:2671-2679. [PMID: 27273894 DOI: 10.1002/art.39772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 05/26/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether use of comedication with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) influences the retention of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA). METHODS Patients with SpA from the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register who started treatment with their first TNFi between 2001 and 2014 were included in this study. Cox regression analysis was used to estimate the effect of comedication with csDMARDs on TNFi retention in 2 types of models: a model in which baseline (time-fixed) variables were included, and a second model incorporating time-varying variables, including sociodemographic features, measures of disease activity, measures of physical function, and cotreatment with other drugs (nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and oral steroids). To control for possible confounding by indication, the effect of csDMARD comedication on TNFi retention was also tested after adjustment for the treatment propensity score. RESULTS In total, 954 patients were included in the study, of whom 289 (30.3%) discontinued treatment with their first TNFi after a median follow-up time of 2.5 years (range 0.08-13 years). Inefficacy was the most common reason for TNFi discontinuation (55.7% of patients). In the multivariable analyses, comedication with csDMARDs had no measurable effect on TNFi retention, neither in the baseline model (hazard ratio [HR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.59-1.16) nor during follow-up in the model adjusted for time-varying covariates (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.68-1.68). The effect of csDMARD comedication remained nonsignificant after propensity score adjustment. CONCLUSION Comedication with csDMARDs does not prolong TNFi retention in patients with SpA in clinical practice, suggesting that there is no benefit conferred by the concomitant use of these drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Sepriano
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - S Ramiro
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal, and Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - R Fonseca
- Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal
| | - J Borges
- Instituto Português de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - L Teixeira
- Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal
| | - P D Carvalho
- Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - M Cerqueira
- Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Portugal
| | - J Neves
- Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho, Ponte de Lima, Portugal
| | | | - A Barcelos
- Hospital Infante D. Pedro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | - M J Salvador
- Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | | | - H Santos
- Instituto Português de Reumatologia, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - E Vieira-Sousa
- Lisbon Academic Medical Center and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - H Canhão
- Lisbon Academic Medical Center and Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - J C Branco
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa and Hospital de Egas Moniz-CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - F Pimentel-Santos
- Universidade Nova de Lisboa and Hospital de Egas Moniz-CHLO, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - R Landewé
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Atrium Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|