Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Psychiatry. Mar 19, 2024; 14(3): 370-379
Published online Mar 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370
Published online Mar 19, 2024. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of non-brain injured patients, n (%)
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52) | Propofol (n = 63) | P value | |
Age (yr), median (IQR) | 61.0 (55.0-64.0) | 61.0 (53.0-66.0) | 0.663 |
Male | 30 (57.7) | 39 (61.9) | 0.646 |
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) | 21.8 (19.6-24.3) | 21.1 (19.0-22.3) | 0.191 |
SAPS II, median (IQR) | 46.0 (38.0-54.0) | 46.0 (36.0-53.0) | 0.675 |
Main reason for ICU | |||
Medical | 37 (71.2) | 44 (69.9) | 0.983 |
Surgical | 10 (19.2) | 13 (20.6) | |
Trauma | 5 (9.6) | 6 (9.5) | |
Infection at ICU admission | 24 (46.2) | 30 (47.6) | 0.875 |
SOFA score of organ > 2 | |||
Respiratory | 30 (57.7) | 35 (55.6) | 0.818 |
Cardiovascular | 26 (50.0) | 27 (42.9) | 0.444 |
Renal | 8 (15.4) | 10 (15.9) | 0.943 |
Coagulation | 4 (7.7) | 6 (9.5) | 0.729 |
Liver | 1 (1.9) | 1 (1.6) | 0.891 |
Total SOFA score, median (IQR) | 7.0 (4.0-9.0) | 6.0 (3.0-9.0) | 0.954 |
RASS score at enrollment, median (IQR) | -2 (-3 to -1) | -3 (-3 to -1) | 0.247 |
Time from ICU admission to drug initiation (h), median (IQR) | 32.0 (20.0-35.0) | 31.0 (20.0-42.0) | 0.798 |
Table 2 Dosage of study drugs during mechanical ventilation
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52) | Propofol (n = 63) | P value | |
Duration of study drug infusion (h), median (IQR) | 52.0 (36.0-73.5) | 53.0 (37.0-72.0) | 0.958 |
Dose of study drug (μg or mg/kg/h), median (IQR) | 0.58 (0.34-0.79) | 0.82 (0.65-1.32) | - |
Dose of remifentanil (μg/kg/h), median (IQR) | 4.5 (4.0-5.0) | 4.6 (4.0-5.0) | 0.395 |
Receiving rescue sedation, n (%) | 36.0 (69.2) | 32.0 (50.8) | 0.045 |
Table 3 Comparison of sedative effect between the two groups
Dexmedetomidine (n = 52) | Propofol (n = 63) | P value | |
Percentage of time within the target RASS (%), median (IQR) | 85.6 (65.8-96.6) | 86.7 (72.3-95.3) | 0.592 |
Percentage of target RASS score (%), median (IQR) | 72.2 (60.8-91.7) | 73.3 (60.0-100.0) | 0.880 |
Table 4 Comparison of S100-β serum levels between the two groups
Time | Dexmedetomidine | Propofol | P value | ||
n | S100-β | n | S100-β | ||
Day 0 | 52 | 0.12 (0.06-0.18) | 63 | 0.14 (0.08-0.23) | 0.4080 |
Day 1 | 52 | 2.12 (2.03-2.22) | 63 | 3.02 (2.92-3.18) | < 0.001 |
Day 2 | 52 | 2.30 (2.18-2.48) | 63 | 3.53 (3.32-3.85) | < 0.001 |
Day 3 | 52 | 2.88 (2.67-3.05) | 63 | 3.62 (3.39-4.06) | < 0.001 |
Day 4 | 35 | 3.58 (3.36-3.85) | 40 | 4.70 (4.35-4.97) | < 0.001 |
Day 5 | 22 | 4.46 (4.34-4.58) | 28 | 4.98 (4.86-5.44) | < 0.001 |
Day 6 | 15 | 4.83 (4.68-5.03) | 19 | 5.33 (4.98-5.65) | 0.0026 |
Day 7 | 10 | 5.06 (4.81-5.32) | 14 | 5.38 (5.19-5.67) | 0.0562 |
Table 5 Comparison of neuron-specific enolase serum levels between the two groups
Time | Dexmedetomidine | Propofol | P value | ||
n | NSE | n | NSE | ||
Day 0 | 52 | 9.95 (9.08-10.65) | 63 | 9.86 (9.35-10.56) | 0.9570 |
Day 1 | 52 | 20.09 (17.63-21.43) | 63 | 21.42 (20.71-23.08) | < 0.001 |
Day 2 | 52 | 20.35 (17.96-21.50) | 63 | 22.35 (21.38-23.92) | < 0.001 |
Day 3 | 52 | 24.89 (21.87-26.85) | 63 | 26.25 (25.15-27.35) | < 0.001 |
Day 4 | 35 | 26.62 (23.43-29.35) | 40 | 29.17 (26.61-31.14) | 0.0082 |
Day 5 | 22 | 26.75 (24.93-29.37) | 28 | 29.66 (27.72-31.14) | 0.0047 |
Day 6 | 15 | 28.93 (26.35-30.52) | 19 | 30.72 (28.65-31.98) | 0.0774 |
Day 7 | 10 | 28.34 (26.95-31.23) | 14 | 30.54 (28.90-32.46) | 0.2060 |
- Citation: Yuan HX, Zhang LN, Li G, Qiao L. Brain protective effect of dexmedetomidine vs propofol for sedation during prolonged mechanical ventilation in non-brain injured patients. World J Psychiatry 2024; 14(3): 370-379
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v14/i3/370.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.370