Zhu SY, Ge W, Zhang H. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and homocysteine levels for cognitive impairment in thalamic infarction. World J Psychiatry 2023; 13(12): 985-994 [PMID: 38186727 DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i12.985]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Shan-Yao Zhu, Doctor, Chief Physician, Department of Internal Medicine-Neurology, Chaohu Hospital Affiliated to Anhui Medical University, No. 64 Chaohu North Road, Hefei 238000, Anhui Province, China. zsydoc@126.com
Research Domain of This Article
Clinical Neurology
Article-Type of This Article
Case Control Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Table 4 Correlation analysis of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Homocysteine levels and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score
Project
Hcy
non-HDL-C
r value
P value
r value
P value
Viewspace/execution
0.292
0.003
0.233
0.000
Named
0.478
0.000
0.487
0.004
Attention
0.658
0.002
0.622
0.000
Language ability
0.451
0.000
0.422
0.002
Abstract
0.302
0.001
0.368
0.000
Delay memories
0.367
0.000
0.308
0.002
Directional
0.685
0.003
0.676
0.001
MoCA scores
0.703
0.000
0.705
0.000
Table 5 Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of serum non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and Homocysteine levels for the diagnosis of cognitive impairment in patients with thalamic infarction
Variable
The critical value
AUC
Sensitivity
Specificity
95%CI
About an index
Hcy (μmol/L)
22.540
0.709
0.724
0.630
0.599-0.816
0.354
Non-HDL-C (tendency/L)
1.351
0.738
0.701
0.870
0.618-0.859
0.571
Hcy in combination with non-HDL-C
-
0.769
0.758
0.889
0.721-0.895
0.647
Table 6 Differences in clinical characteristics between patients with thalamic infarction in the good and poor prognosis groups
Project
Good prognosis group (n = 50)
Poor prognosis group (n = 30)
χ2/t
P value
Age (yr)
65.12 ± 6.74
64.13 ± 10.07
0.527
0.600
Men
32 (64.00)
20 (66.67)
0.059
0.809
Time of onset (h)
20.39 ± 3.21
20.42 ± 3.19
0.041
0.968
Smoking history
26 (52.00)
16 (53.33)
0.013
0.908
The history of drinking
24 (48.00)
13 (43.33)
0.164
0.685
Hypertension
24 (48.00)
18 (60.00)
1.083
0.298
Diabetes
14 (28.00)
9 (30.00)
0.037
0.848
CHD
8 (16.00)
4 (13.33)
0.105
0.746
NIHSS score
14.52 ± 5.43
17.91 ± 5.78
2.639
0.010
Non-HDL-C (tendency/L)
3.08 ± 0.46
3.79 ± 0.57
6.103
0.000
Hcy (μmol/L)
14.54 ± 0.78
27.51 ± 4.08
21.909
0.000
Massive cerebral infarction
13 (26.00)
15 (50.00)
4.747
0.029
Atrial fibrillation
6 (12.00)
9 (30.00)
3.988
0.046
APTT (1 S)
31.55 ± 3.45
33.43 ± 4.32
2.144
0.035
Table 7 Multivariate logistic regression analysis of influencing factors of a poor prognosis in patients with thalamic infarction
Variable
OR
95%CI
Wald
P value
Atrial fibrillation
0.232
0.068-0.768
5.701
0.016
Non-HDL-C
1.753
1.243-2.477
10.187
0.001
Hcy
1.051
1.006-1.096
5.323
0.020
APTT
1.127
1.003-1.186
4.116
0.077
NIHSS score
1.091
1.004-1.268
4.134
0.012
Citation: Zhu SY, Ge W, Zhang H. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and homocysteine levels for cognitive impairment in thalamic infarction. World J Psychiatry 2023; 13(12): 985-994