Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Psychiatry. Dec 19, 2023; 13(12): 1027-1036
Published online Dec 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i12.1027
Published online Dec 19, 2023. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i12.1027
Table 1 Comparison of Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assessment and activities of daily living scores between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Group | MMSE score | MoCA score | ADL score | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Study group (n = 30) | 20.63 ± 2.94 | 26.80 ± 2.59a | 19.50 ± 2.84 | 26.77 ± 2.08a | 45.00 ± 4.78 | 63.70 ± 6.25a |
Control group (n = 30) | 19.73 ± 3.10 | 24.97 ± 3.29a | 19.70 ± 1.60 | 24.70 ± 2.42a | 45.97 ± 4.62 | 57.40 ± 4.99a |
P value | 0.253 | 0.020 | 0.738 | 0.001 | 0.429 | < 0.001 |
t value | 1.154 | 2.400 | 0.336 | 3.545 | 0.797 | 4.314 |
Table 2 Comparison of cholinergic system component levels between the two groups (mean ± SD, nmol/mL)
Table 3 Comparison of vascular endothelial function markers between the two groups (mean ± SD, d)
Table 4 Comparison of serum β2-microglobulin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, and visinin-like protein 1 concentrations between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | Β2-MG (mg/L) | VILIP-1 (ng/L) | GFAP (mg/L) | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Study group (n = 30) | 2.64 ± 0.65 | 1.49 ± 0.48a | 520.59 ± 55.39 | 409.67 ± 40.77a | 9.17 ± 1.32 | 6.04 ± 1.70a |
Control group (n = 30) | 2.79 ± 0.42 | 1.93 ± 0.28a | 531.47 ± 54.03 | 435.83 ± 37.09a | 9.87 ± 1.56 | 7.44 ± 1.06a |
P value | 0.294 | < 0.001 | 0.444 | 0.012 | 0.064 | < 0.001 |
t value | 1.061 | 4.339 | 0.771 | 2.599 | 1.888 | 3.817 |
Table 5 Comparison of pulsatility index values of cerebral vessels between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | LACA | RACA | LMCA | RMCA | LPCA | RPCA | ||||||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Study group | 1.34 ± 0.28 | 0.94 ± 0.11a | 1.33 ± 0.22 | 0.97 ± 0.12a | 1.35 ± 0.26 | 0.95 ± 0.16a | 1.34 ± 0.24 | 0.94 ± 0.19a | 1.37 ± 0.28 | 0.93 ± 0.18a | 1.34 ± 0.32 | 0.98 ± 0.15a |
Control group | 1.35 ± 0.27 | 1.11 ± 0.42a | 1.37 ± 0.27 | 1.12 ± 0.36a | 1.39 ± 0.22 | 1.10 ± 0.31a | 1.35 ± 0.37 | 1.12 ± 0.34a | 1.36 ± 0.40 | 1.11 ± 0.30a | 1.35 ± 0.41 | 1.12 ± 0.35a |
P value | 0.832 | 0.040 | 0.536 | 0.049 | 0.490 | 0.024 | 0.905 | 0.013 | 0.857 | 0.007 | 0.983 | 0.047 |
t value | 0.213 | 2.139 | 0.622 | 2.043 | 0.695 | 2.339 | 0.120 | 2.589 | 0.180 | 2.805 | 0.021 | 2.052 |
Table 6 Comparison of the resistance index values of the cerebral vessels in the two groups (mean ± SD)
Group | LACA | RACA | LMCA | RMCA | LPCA | RPCA | ||||||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Study group | 0.86 ± 0.18 | 0.54 ± 0.10a | 0.86 ± 0.22 | 0.53 ± 0.13a | 0.85 ± 0.25 | 0.53 ± 0.16a | 0.95 ± 0.28 | 0.48 ± 0.13a | 0.84 ± 0.28 | 0.49 ± 0.11a | 0.93 ± 0.25 | 0.53 ± 0.13a |
Control group | 0.93 ± 0.23 | 0.64 ± 0.11a | 0.84 ± 0.15 | 0.64 ± 0.15a | 0.82 ± 0.22 | 0.65 ± 0.21a | 0.92 ± 0.21 | 0.62 ± 0.24a | 0.86 ± 0.20 | 0.58 ± 0.14a | 0.90 ± 0.18 | 0.63 ± 0.15a |
P value | 0.225 | 0.001 | 0.729 | 0.004 | 0.720 | 0.014 | 0.582 | 0.007 | 0.701 | 0.006 | 0.566 | 0.008 |
t value | 1.226 | 3.661 | 0.349 | 3.033 | 0.360 | 2.547 | 0.553 | 2.847 | 0.386 | 2.864 | 0.578 | 2.750 |
- Citation: Duan Y, Tang HX. Efficacy of enhanced extracorporeal counterpulsation combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of cognitive impairment after stroke. World J Psychiatry 2023; 13(12): 1027-1036
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v13/i12/1027.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v13.i12.1027