Published online Mar 19, 2025. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.103175
Revised: December 27, 2024
Accepted: January 21, 2025
Published online: March 19, 2025
Processing time: 107 Days and 12 Hours
Knowledge about organ donation and transplantation plays a crucial role in shaping individuals' health behaviors and perceptions, potentially impacting their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Future anxiety, defined as the anticipatory worry individuals experience regarding potential negative events and outcomes in their future, may further influence these outcomes.
To investigate the effect of such knowledge on HRQoL and to examine whether future anxiety mediates this relationship.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with 659 participants aged 18 to 65 years. Participants completed the Organ Tissue Donation and Transplantation Know
The findings indicated that greater knowledge about organ donation and tran
The study concludes that future anxiety partially mediates the positive impact of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation on HRQoL. These results suggest that increasing public knowledge in this area may reduce future anxieties and enhance quality of life.
Core Tip: This study explores the link between organ donation and transplantation knowledge and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with a focus on the mediating role of future anxiety. Findings reveal that increased knowledge is associated with improved HRQoL and reduced future anxiety. Structural Equation Modeling shows that future anxiety partially mediates this relationship, indicating that reducing future anxiety can amplify the positive effects of knowledge on HRQoL. These results highlight the importance of educational interventions to boost public awareness, reduce anxiety, and promote overall well-being.
- Citation: Huseynov A, Satici B. Future anxiety mediates the relationship between organ donation and transplantation knowledge and health-related quality of life. World J Psychiatry 2025; 15(3): 103175
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v15/i3/103175.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.103175
The level of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation reflects individuals' awareness and understanding of the fundamental workings of these crucial medical procedures, their ethical dimensions, and their impacts on the healthcare system[1]. This knowledge is vital for both donors and potential recipients, directly influencing their decision-making processes. Enhancing awareness of organ donation not only contributes to the overall healthcare system but also increases the survival chances of individuals suffering from organ failure[2]. Furthermore, raising societal awareness and correcting misinformation help foster positive attitudes toward organ donation within the community[3]. In this context, it has been demonstrated that the level of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation affects individuals' health behaviors as well as their decisions that consider societal benefit.
The level of knowledge regarding organ donation and transplantation is considered a significant factor influencing society's health perceptions and individuals' levels of future-related anxiety. Future anxiety, a psychological construct referring to the fear of uncertain and potentially negative future events, has been shown to mediate the relationship between health-related factors and overall well-being[4]. In this regard, the concept of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) refers to the overall quality of life based on health, encompassing individuals' physical, mental, and social well-being[5]. HRQoL pertains not only to the presence or absence of diseases but also to how individuals perceive their daily lives and how health problems affect their quality of life[6].
Having sufficient knowledge about organ donation and transplantation can shape individuals' health behaviors and enhance their perceptions of overall well-being[7]. Research indicates that individuals with higher levels of knowledge are more likely to engage in proactive health behaviors, experience lower levels of future anxiety, and report improved quality of life[8-10]. This knowledge not only deepens the understanding of organ transplantation but also helps in
When exploring the relationship between knowledge of organ donation and transplantation and health-related quality of life, the concept of future anxiety emerges as a significant mediating variable. Future anxiety is defined as the worry and fear individuals experience regarding potential negative events in an uncertain future[12]. This form of anxiety can affect individuals' current mental states and health perceptions, resulting in noticeable changes in their quality of life[13]. According to cognitive-behavioral theory[14], a higher level of knowledge may help individuals restructure and manage concerns about uncertain medical outcomes, thus reducing future anxiety. Similarly, from a health belief model per
Organ donation and transplantation are pivotal in saving lives and improving healthcare outcomes, yet public misconceptions and insufficient knowledge may deter individuals from fully engaging with this life-saving process[18]. By examining how knowledge of organ donation and transplantation affects HRQoL, this study sheds light on strategies that could alleviate societal concerns and bolster trust in healthcare services.
The present study primarily aims to investigate the effect of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation on health-related quality of life. Furthermore, it seeks to clarify how future anxiety-defined as the worry individuals experience about uncertain and potentially negative events[4,10,19]-mediates this relationship. By identifying the me
Grounded in previous work on organ donation knowledge, future anxiety, and HRQoL, the current research aims to extend these findings by exploring how sufficient information regarding organ donation and transplantation might improve individuals’ HRQoL via a reduction in future anxiety. Through this approach, we hope to develop evidence-based strategies that can positively influence health behaviors and strengthen trust in healthcare systems. The hypotheses are presented below.
H1: Knowledge about organ donation and transplantation will positively predict HRQoL.
H2: Knowledge about organ donation and transplantation will negatively predict future anxiety.
H3: Future anxiety will negatively predict HRQoL.
H4: Future anxiety will mediate the relationship between knowledge about organ donation and transplantation and HRQoL.
This study employed a cross-sectional research design to examine the relationship between knowledge of organ donation and transplantation and HRQoL, as well as to explore the mediating role of future anxiety.
The study involved a total of 659 participants, 460 females (69.8%) and 199 males (30.2%). Participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 65 years (mean ± SD = 22.40 ± 7.16). Their heights ranged from 150 cm to 190 cm (mean ± SD = 166.01 ± 7.77), and their weights ranged from 40 kg to 145 kg (mean ± SD = 61.36 ± 12.70). In terms of self-reported economic status, 84 individuals (12.7%) identified as low, 525 individuals (79.7%) as medium, and 50 individuals (7.6%) as high.
Organ tissue donation and transplantation knowledge scale: Participants’ knowledge levels regarding organ donation and transplantation were assessed using a previously validated scale developed by Ozturk Emiral et al[20]. This in
Dark future scale: Future anxiety was measured using the Dark Future Scale, developed by Yıldırım et al[21]. This unidimensional scale consists of five items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 6 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety about uncertain or negative future events. The scale showed acceptable reliability in this study (Cronbach’s α = 0.77).
HRQoL scale (European Health Interview Survey-quality of life 8): Participants’ HRQoL was evaluated using the European Health Interview Survey-quality of life 8, an eight-item unidimensional instrument adapted into Turkish by Eser et al[22]. Items in this scale are also rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very bad, 5 = very good), yielding higher scores for better perceived HRQoL. In the present study, the scale exhibited acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.84).
We started by performing correlation analyses and descriptive statistics, then moved on to Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). SEM is a comprehensive statistical approach that enables researchers to test complex relationships among both observed and latent variables simultaneously, offering a nuanced perspective on how constructs interrelate[23]. To enhance clarity regarding the analysis procedure, a path diagram illustrating both the measurement model and the final structural model has been provided (Figure 1A and B). Adhering Kline's two-step SEM approach[23], we first evaluated the measurement model to confirm that the observed indicators accurately represented the latent variables and that their interrelationships were valid. Once the measurement model was validated, we tested the proposed structural model.
To interpret the SEM results, we relied on widely recommended model evaluation guidelines, referring to the goodness-of-fit indices suggested by Hu and Bentler[24], including χ2, degrees of freedom, Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Normed Fit Index (NFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA). As a result, the ratio of χ² to degrees of freedom (χ²/df) is often used, with values less than 5 considered acceptable and values less than 3 indicating a good fit. The CFI, NFI, and TLI indices measure incremental fit, comparing the proposed model to a baseline (null) model; values exceeding. Ninety indicates acceptable fit, and values above. Ninety-five suggests excellent fit. The SRMR and RMSEA indices evaluate absolute model fit, with SRMR values below. Eight and RMSEA values below. Eight indicating good fit[24].
Additionally, we employed the bootstrapping method with 10000 resamples to further support the significance of the mediation effect. Bootstrapping is a resampling technique that generates confidence intervals for indirect effects. Mediation is considered significant if the CI do not include zero[25]. This approach enhances the robustness of the findings by avoiding assumptions of normality in the data distribution. The mediation is considered significant when zero is not included within the bootstrap CI.
This study was approved by the Yıldız Technical University Ethics Committee (Ethics Approval No: 20241003353). Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study, and they were involved based on the principle of voluntariness. Participants' identities were kept confidential, and the data collected were processed anonymously.
Table 1 provides the descriptive statistics and Pearson correlation coefficients for organ donation and transplantation knowledge, future anxiety, and health-related quality of life, and irrational happiness. The analysis indicated significant associations among these variables. Organ donation and transplantation knowledge was positively correlated with HRQoL (r = 0.453, P < 0.001). Conversely, organ donation and transplantation knowledge was negatively correlated with future anxiety (r = -0.272, P < 0.001), indicating that greater organ donation and transplantation knowledge is linked to lower levels of future anxiety. Furthermore, HRQoL was also negatively correlated with future anxiety (r = -0.359, P < 0.001).
In order to address potential gender-related influences, gender was included as a control variable, and independent-samples t-tests were performed. Specifically, females (n = 460) and males (n = 199) did not significantly differ in organ donation knowledge-t (657) = 0.72, P = 0.47-with females (mean = 13.88, SD = 2.94) and males (mean = 14.05, SD = 2.18) showing similar mean scores. There was also no significant difference in HRQoL-t (657) = 0.69, P = 0.49-when comparing females (mean = 26.69, SD = 5.05) and males (mean = 26.98, SD = 4.62). However, females (mean = 16.19, SD = 3.61) reported significantly higher future anxiety than males (mean = 15.47, SD = 3.40), t (657) = 2.41, P = 0.016, although the effect size was small. Because gender was controlled in our main analyses, these differences did not substantially alter our overall mediation findings.
The measurement model included three latent constructs -organ donation and transplantation knowledge, future anxiety, and health-related quality of life- represented by a total of nine observed variables. Specifically, there were two observed variables each for organ donation and transplantation knowledge and health-related quality of life, and five for future anxiety. The model exhibited a good fit with the data, as indicated by the following statistics: χ² (24, n = 659) = 91.07, P < 0.001, with a χ²/df ratio of 3.79; GFI = 0.971; NFI = 0.963; CFI = 0.973; TLI = 0.959; RFI = 0.945; SRMR = 0.051; and RMSEA = 0.065. Additionally, factor loadings ranged from 0.464 to 0.967, demonstrating that the observed variables were strong indicators of their respective latent constructs.
In our structural model analysis, we explored whether future anxiety mediates the relationship between organ donation and transplantation knowledge and health-related quality of life, while controlling for age, gender, height, and weight. The model demonstrated a good fit to the data: χ² (52, n = 659) = 121.68, P < 0.001; χ²/df = 2.34; GFI = 0.973; NFI = 0.959; CFI = 0.976; TLI = 0.964; RFI = 0.939; SRMR = 0.040; RMSEA = 0.045. The results indicated that organ donation and transplantation knowledge had a direct and positive effect on HRQoL (β = 0.473, P < 0.01). Additionally, organ donation and transplantation knowledge was found to have a direct and negative effect on future anxiety (β = -0.276, P < 0.01), which in turn had a direct and negative effect on HRQoL (β = -0.235, P < 0.01). Bootstrapping analysis with 5000 resamples confirmed that the indirect effect was significant (bootstrap coefficient = 0.065, 95%CI: 0.043-0.091) (Table 2). These findings suggest that future anxiety acts as a mediator between organ donation and transplantation knowledge and health-related quality of life. The path coefficients for this model are illustrated in Figure 1C.
Direct effect | Coefficient | 95%CI | |
Lower level | Upper level | ||
ODTK: Future anxiety | -0.276 | -0.337 | -0.202 |
ODTK: HRQoL | 0.473 | 0.359 | 0.562 |
Future anxiety: HRQoL | -0.235 | -0.318 | -0.151 |
Indirect effect | |||
ODTK, Future anxiety: HRQoL | 0.065 | 0.043 | 0.091 |
The results of this study provide significant insights by examining how individuals' knowledge about organ donation and transplantation affects their future anxiety and health-related quality of life. The findings indicate that having knowledge in this area directly and negatively impacts individuals' future anxiety. Moreover, it was determined that future anxiety has a negative effect on HRQoL and that this anxiety mediates the relationship between knowledge of organ donation and transplantation and HRQoL.
These findings reveal that a higher level of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation significantly reduces individuals' future anxiety. This suggests that being well-informed decreases uncertainties, allowing individuals to feel less anxious about potential risks and challenges they might face in the future. Increased knowledge can help individuals feel more confident in their ability to manage future health risks. Within the framework of Bandura's theory[26] of knowledge and self-efficacy, there is a positive relationship between an individual's level of knowledge and their perception of self-efficacy, which can be a crucial factor in controlling future anxiety levels. Therefore, it can be argued that being knowledgeable about organ donation and transplantation leads individuals to experience less anxiety re
Another finding of this study is that future anxiety has a negative impact on health-related quality of life. This result aligns with literature suggesting that excessive anxiety can adversely affect individuals' psychological and physical health. According to the Stress and Coping Model[29], anxiety can negatively influence quality of life by depleting individuals' cognitive and emotional resources. In this context, high levels of anxiety may weaken individuals' health-related decision-making processes, stress management abilities, and overall quality of life[30,31]. The relationship between anxiety and HRQoL is well-documented, yet our study provides a nuanced contribution by identifying future anxiety as a specific mediator in this relationship. This finding underscores the importance of addressing anticipatory stressors in clinical and community settings, particularly for individuals navigating complex health systems. The findings indicate that managing anxiety is important for improving HRQoL, and that increasing one's level of knowledge may play a supportive role in this process. Reducing anxiety can make it more likely for individuals to adopt healthy lifestyle habits and maintain their well-being.
Another significant outcome of this study is the direct positive effect of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation on health-related quality of life. This finding supports the notion that knowledge strengthens individuals' health perceptions and promotes positive health behaviors. According to Social Cognitive Theory[32], individuals' knowledge-based perceptions of self-efficacy positively influence their health beliefs and behaviors. Within this the
These findings have several important implications for public health and clinical practice. First, public health campaigns and educational initiatives should prioritize increasing knowledge about organ donation and transplantation. Providing accessible, accurate, and culturally sensitive information can help reduce uncertainties, alleviate future anxiety, and enhance trust in healthcare systems. Community workshops, media campaigns, and outreach programs can play pivotal roles in fostering awareness and promoting positive attitudes toward organ donation. Second, healthcare providers and mental health professionals can implement stress management programs, cognitive-behavioral therapy, or mindfulness interventions to address future anxiety. These strategies can help individuals better manage stressors, thereby improving their health-related quality of life. Finally, healthcare policymakers should consider integrating education about organ donation into broader health literacy programs, as increased knowledge has a cascading effect on confidence, health behaviors, and overall well-being.
This study has several limitations. First, its cross-sectional design restricts our ability to determine causal relationships between variables. As a result, we cannot definitively interpret the effects of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation on future anxiety and HRQoL within a causal framework. Second, the use of self-reported questionnaires for data collection may introduce potential biases, such as social desirability bias and inaccuracies stemming from participants' self-perceptions. Additionally, the demographic characteristics and geographical distribution of the sample may limit the generalizability of the findings. In light of these limitations, future research should consider employing longitudinal designs to more clearly elucidate causal relationships and utilizing larger, more diverse samples to enhance the generalizability of the results.
This study has found that future anxiety mediates the relationship between the level of knowledge about organ donation and transplantation and health-related quality of life. This finding suggests that the impact of knowledge on HRQoL may occur indirectly through its effect on individuals' levels of anxiety. The mediating role of future anxiety indicates that increased knowledge can lead to reduced anxiety among individuals, thereby contributing to a higher quality of life. These insights underscore the importance of educational initiatives aimed at enhancing public knowledge about organ donation and transplantation, as such efforts may alleviate future anxieties and improve overall well-being.
1. | Arshad A, Anderson B, Sharif A. Comparison of organ donation and transplantation rates between opt-out and opt-in systems. Kidney Int. 2019;95:1453-1460. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 90] [Cited by in RCA: 103] [Article Influence: 17.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Jawoniyi O, Gormley K, McGleenan E, Noble HR. Organ donation and transplantation: Awareness and roles of healthcare professionals-A systematic literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27:e726-e738. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 32] [Cited by in RCA: 40] [Article Influence: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Da Silva IR, Frontera JA. Worldwide barriers to organ donation. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:112-118. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 40] [Cited by in RCA: 52] [Article Influence: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Paredes MR, Apaolaza V, Fernandez-Robin C, Hartmann P, Yañez-Martinez D. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on subjective mental well-being: The interplay of perceived threat, future anxiety and resilience. Pers Individ Dif. 2021;170:110455. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 188] [Cited by in RCA: 161] [Article Influence: 40.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Karimi M, Brazier J. Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34:645-649. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 633] [Cited by in RCA: 792] [Article Influence: 88.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Nguyen HC, Nguyen MH, Do BN, Tran CQ, Nguyen TTP, Pham KM, Pham LV, Tran KV, Duong TT, Tran TV, Duong TH, Nguyen TT, Nguyen QH, Hoang TM, Nguyen KT, Pham TTM, Yang SH, Chao JC, Duong TV. People with Suspected COVID-19 Symptoms Were More Likely Depressed and Had Lower Health-Related Quality of Life: The Potential Benefit of Health Literacy. J Clin Med. 2020;9:965. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 272] [Cited by in RCA: 304] [Article Influence: 60.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Sosnowski R, Kulpa M, Ziętalewicz U, Wolski JK, Nowakowski R, Bakuła R, Demkow T. Basic issues concerning health-related quality of life. Cent European J Urol. 2017;70:206-211. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in RCA: 35] [Article Influence: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Husson O, Mols F, van de Poll-Franse LV. The relation between information provision and health-related quality of life, anxiety and depression among cancer survivors: a systematic review. Ann Oncol. 2011;22:761-772. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 289] [Cited by in RCA: 355] [Article Influence: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Kästner A, Lücker P, Hannich A, Schmeyers L, Lücker J, Hoffmann W. COVID-19-related future anxiety is associated with the health-related quality of life in school-aged children and adolescents-A cross-sectional study. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1003876. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in RCA: 6] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Duplaga M, Grysztar M. The Association between Future Anxiety, Health Literacy and the Perception of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare (Basel). 2021;9:43. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 55] [Cited by in RCA: 34] [Article Influence: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Kaplan RM, Hays RD. Health-Related Quality of Life Measurement in Public Health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2022;43:355-373. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 87] [Article Influence: 21.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Twivy E, Grol M, Fox E. Individual differences in affective flexibility predict future anxiety and worry. Cogn Emot. 2021;35:425-434. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 4] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Article Influence: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Jannini TB, Mordacchini I, Rossi R, Socci V, Lorenzo GD. The influence of age on the relationship between future anxiety, loneliness, and quality of life: evidence from a sample of 5409 individuals in the general population in Italy. Curr Psychol. 2024;43:30148-30155. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] |
14. | Beck AT. Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. New York: International Universities Press, 1976. [Cited in This Article: ] |
15. | Rosenstock IM. Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Monogr. 1974;2:328-335. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2239] [Cited by in RCA: 2324] [Article Influence: 45.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Buonocore M, Bosia M, Bechi M, Spangaro M, Cavedoni S, Cocchi F, Bianchi L, Guglielmino C, Mastromatteo AR, Cavallaro R. Targeting anxiety to improve quality of life in patients with schizophrenia. Eur Psychiatry. 2017;45:129-135. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in RCA: 15] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020;51:102083. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 952] [Cited by in RCA: 778] [Article Influence: 155.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Rana A, Gruessner A, Agopian VG, Khalpey Z, Riaz IB, Kaplan B, Halazun KJ, Busuttil RW, Gruessner RW. Survival benefit of solid-organ transplant in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:252-259. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 272] [Cited by in RCA: 332] [Article Influence: 33.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Frings D, Sykes S, Ojo A, Rowlands G, Trasolini A, Dadaczynski K, Okan O, Wills J. Differences in digital health literacy and future anxiety between health care and other university students in England during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:658. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Article Influence: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Ozturk Emiral G, Isıktekin Atalay B, Altunok H, Gokler ME, Onsuz MF, Metintas S. Development of a Reliable and Valid Organ Tissue Donation and Transplantation Knowledge Scale. Transplant Proc. 2017;49:260-266. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in RCA: 11] [Article Influence: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Yıldırım M, Kaynar Ö, Arslan G, Chirico F. Fear of COVID-19, Resilience, and Future Anxiety: Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Dark Future Scale. J Pers Med. 2023;13. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in RCA: 4] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Eser E, Lağarlı T, Baydur H, Akkurt V, Akkuş H, Arslan E, Cengiz E, Çiftçioğlu G, Işık H, Karabacak H, Özkapu T, Özyıldırım E, Soybaş H, Vural O. EUROHIS (WHOQOL-8.Tr) Türkçe sürümünün Türk toplumundaki psikometrik özellikleri. Turk J Public Health. 2010;8:1-10. [Cited in This Article: ] |
23. | Kline RB. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press, 2011. [Cited in This Article: ] |
24. | Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Modeling. 1999;6:1-55. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] |
25. | Igartua JJ, Hayes AF. Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: Concepts, Computations, and Some Common Confusions. Span J Psychol. 2021;24:e49. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in RCA: 29] [Article Influence: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman, 1997. [Cited in This Article: ] |
27. | Oh HJ, Lee H. When Do People Verify and Share Health Rumors on Social Media? The Effects of Message Importance, Health Anxiety, and Health Literacy. J Health Commun. 2019;24:837-847. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 57] [Cited by in RCA: 43] [Article Influence: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Fang S, Mushtaque I. The Moderating Role of Health Literacy and Health Promoting Behavior in the Relationship Among Health Anxiety, Emotional Regulation, and Cyberchondria. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2024;17:51-62. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer, 1984. [Cited in This Article: ] |
30. | Hedman E, Axelsson E, Görling A, Ritzman C, Ronnheden M, El Alaoui S, Andersson E, Lekander M, Ljótsson B. Internet-delivered exposure-based cognitive-behavioural therapy and behavioural stress management for severe health anxiety: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2014;205:307-314. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 70] [Cited by in RCA: 60] [Article Influence: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Lazarus RS. Stress and Emotion: A New Synthesis. New York: Springer, 1999. [Cited in This Article: ] |
32. | Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 6051] [Cited by in RCA: 3568] [Article Influence: 148.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Mohammadi Mehr M, Zamani-alavijeh F, Hasanzadeh A, Fasihi T. Effect of Healthy Lifestyle Educational Programs on Happiness and Life Satisfaction in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study. Salmand. 2019;13:440-451. [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in RCA: 3] [Article Influence: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Ong JQL, Lim LJH, Ho RCM, Ho CSH. Depression, anxiety, and associated psychological outcomes in living organ transplant donors: A systematic review. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2021;70:51-75. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in RCA: 5] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |