Published online Jun 22, 2016. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v6.i2.226
Peer-review started: January 19, 2016
First decision: March 23, 2016
Revised: May 9, 2016
Accepted: May 17, 2016
Article in press: May 27, 2016
Published online: June 22, 2016
Processing time: 156 Days and 5.1 Hours
AIM: To validate the first third-person-rated measure assessing combat-related peritraumatic stress symptoms and evaluate its psychometric properties and war-zone applicability.
METHODS: The valid assessment of peritraumatic symptoms in the theater of military operations represents a significant challenge in combat-related, mental health research, which mainly relies on retrospective, subjective self-report ratings. This longitudinal observational study used data from actively deployed troops to correlate third-person observer ratings of deployment peritraumatic behaviors [Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire - Observer Rated (PBQ-OR)] collected on a bi-monthly basis with post-deployment (1-wk follow-up) ratings of the previously validated PBQ self-rate version (PBQ-SR), and (3-mo follow-up) clinician assessed and self-report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, PTSD Checklist). Cronbach’s alpha (α) and correlation coefficients were calculated to assess internal reliability and concurrent validity respectively.
RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty male Marines were included in this study after signing informed consents at pre-deployment (mean age 23.2 ± 2.6 years). Although our findings were limited by an overall sparse return rate of PBQ-OR ratings, the main results indicate satisfactory psychometric properties with good internal consistency for the PBQ-OR (α = 0.88) and high convergent and concurrent validity with 1-wk post-deployment PBQ-SR ratings and 3-mo posttraumatic stress symptoms. Overall, later PBQ-OR report date was associated with higher correlation between PBQ-OR and post-deployment measures. Kappa analysis between PBQ-OR and PBQ-SR single items, showed best agreement in questions relating of mortal peril, desire for revenge, and experience of intense physical reactions. Logistic regression demonstrated satisfactory predictive validity of PBQ-OR total score with respect to PTSD caseness (OR = 1.0513; 95%CI: 1.011-1.093; P = 0.02).
CONCLUSION: Since no comparable tools have been developed, PBQ-OR could be valuable as real-time screening tool for earlier detection of Service Members at risk.
Core tip: The assessment of combat-related peritraumatic symptoms mainly relies on retrospective, subjective self-report ratings. We have therefore developed the Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire - Observer Rated (PBQ-OR), a third-person-rated scale for unit-embedded medical personnel to objectively assess symptoms of combat-related peritraumatic stress in deployed troops. In this study, we validated the PBQ-OR during active deployment and longitudinally evaluated its psychometric properties and war-zone applicability. Our findings show that the PBQ-OR could be used as a screening and monitoring tool in real time and may permit earlier detection of Service Members at risk for posttraumatic stress symptoms to target prevention and early intervention efforts.